Microsoft AZ-700  Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 2 Q21-40

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 21:

You are designing a multi-region Azure network with multiple VNets that require centralized outbound inspection. Each spoke VNet must remain isolated, and dynamic route propagation to on-premises networks is required. Which solution should you implement?
A) Deploy Azure Firewall in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes pointing to the hub
C) Peer all VNets and rely on system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes pointing to the hub

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub ensures centralized inspection for all outbound internet traffic, while maintaining isolation between spoke VNets. Using a BGP-enabled VPN Gateway allows dynamic route propagation between Azure VNets and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR updates and ensuring consistency as network prefixes change. UDRs in each spoke enforce forced tunneling, directing internet-bound traffic to the firewall, which provides TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases cost and operational complexity without offering centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering all VNets and relying on system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, simplifies connectivity but does not provide inspection or policy enforcement. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, route propagation, and firewall health to ensure reliable operation and compliance. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. This design is scalable, allowing new VNets or regions to connect to the hub with minimal configuration changes. Centralized inspection supports threat intelligence, auditing, and security reporting. Dynamic BGP route propagation reduces operational errors and improves hybrid connectivity. By combining hub-and-spoke topology, Azure Firewall, and BGP, organizations achieve secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all outbound traffic, while BGP ensures routes are automatically updated in response to on-premises changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, isolation, dynamic routing, and scalable hybrid connectivity, supporting enterprise-level operational efficiency and security while reducing manual management overhead.

Question 22:

Your organization deploys NVAs in multiple Azure VNets to perform advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must automatically learn Azure system and user routes and advertise learned routes from on-premises without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?
A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager with forced transit

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides a fully managed BGP service that enables NVAs to dynamically exchange routes with Azure. NVAs can advertise learned prefixes from on-premises while learning system and user routes from Azure automatically, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. Option A, static UDRs, is inefficient, error-prone, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited route propagation but does not provide bidirectional BGP learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on centralized firewall policy management and does not enable dynamic route propagation for NVAs. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security policies. Route Server is highly available, ensuring continued route propagation during failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing automated, secure, and scalable routing while integrating NVAs seamlessly. Organizations benefit from dynamic hybrid connectivity, centralized inspection, and reduced manual configuration. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure receives updated routes, and traffic is inspected and routed efficiently. The system is scalable, resilient, and simplifies operational management. By leveraging BGP and Route Server, enterprises can maintain consistent, secure, and compliant routing across multi-region VNets and hybrid environments. Route Server also supports coexistence with UDRs if priorities are carefully managed, allowing flexibility in route control. Dynamic route propagation improves operational efficiency, reduces errors, and ensures all traffic traverses inspection points while preserving isolation and security.

Question 23:

You are designing a multi-region Azure network that requires centralized egress inspection, spoke isolation, and dynamic propagation of on-premises routes. Which solution meets these requirements with minimal management overhead?
A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets across regions using system routes
D) Deploy Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection, maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic route propagation to on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, enabling TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance. Option A, firewalls per spoke, increases cost and complexity and lacks centralized logging and inspection. Option C, peering VNets, bypasses centralized inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but not inspection or policy enforcement. This design is scalable; new VNets or regions can connect to the hub without modifying existing UDRs. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and firewall performance. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Centralized inspection supports threat intelligence, auditing, and reporting. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices, balancing security, scalability, compliance, and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic while maintaining isolation. The design reduces manual management, improves reliability, and supports enterprise-grade hybrid connectivity. Hub-and-spoke architecture, combined with Azure Firewall and BGP, provides centralized control, operational efficiency, and security in multi-region deployments. Organizations can maintain regulatory compliance, monitor traffic centrally, and scale infrastructure seamlessly.

Question 24:

Your company deploys NVAs in Azure VNets to inspect traffic for multiple spokes. NVAs must automatically exchange routing information with Azure and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should be implemented?

A) Configure static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn system and user routes automatically. Option A, static UDRs, is manually intensive, error-prone, and does not scale. Option C, VNet peering with gateway propagation, allows only limited route learning and is not bidirectional for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server ensures route consistency, reduces operational overhead, and supports large-scale enterprise deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filters, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures uninterrupted route propagation. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, enabling NVAs to adapt to network changes automatically, maintain centralized inspection, and support hybrid connectivity efficiently. Dynamic routing reduces manual configuration, prevents errors, ensures proper inspection, and preserves network segmentation. Organizations gain scalable, resilient, and secure routing while integrating NVAs seamlessly into the environment. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are configured carefully, offering flexible route control. The design improves operational efficiency, reliability, and security in complex Azure deployments.

Question 25:

Your organization requires centralized internet egress inspection for multiple Azure VNets while maintaining spoke isolation and automatic route updates reflecting on-premises changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets and rely on system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically between on-premises and Azure VNets, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling through the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases cost and operational complexity and does not centralize logging. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall performance, BGP session health, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures on-premises changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without reconfiguring UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows compliance reporting, threat intelligence integration, and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling ensures all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, balancing security, scalability, compliance, and operational efficiency in multi-region deployments. Organizations achieve centralized control, operational simplicity, secure hybrid connectivity, and regulatory compliance while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 26:

You are designing a multi-region Azure network with multiple VNets and NVAs performing advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically learn Azure routes and advertise learned on-premises routes without manual UDR updates. Which solution should be implemented?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager with forced transit

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional, dynamic BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises routes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure, eliminating the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is manually intensive, error-prone, and does not scale in dynamic networks. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited route propagation but does not provide full bidirectional exchange for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on centralized firewall policy management and does not enable BGP route propagation for NVAs. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and enables large-scale enterprise deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, apply route filters, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continued propagation even during failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for dynamic, hybrid, multi-region network deployments, integrating NVAs seamlessly while maintaining operational efficiency, security, and scalability. Dynamic routing reduces configuration errors and ensures that all traffic is routed correctly through inspection points. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are managed carefully, offering flexible route control. Organizations benefit from centralized inspection, automated routing, operational efficiency, and secure hybrid connectivity, ensuring compliance and scalability. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure receives updated routes, and the network remains segmented. By leveraging BGP and Route Server, enterprises achieve reliable, resilient, and scalable routing across multiple VNets and hybrid environments.

Question 27:

Your company requires all outbound internet traffic from multiple VNets to pass through a central inspection point while preserving isolation between spokes. Routing should adapt dynamically to changes in on-premises networks. Which solution is recommended?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets across regions using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection, maintaining spoke isolation while enabling all internet-bound traffic to be inspected. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates and ensuring route consistency. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling through the hub firewall, enabling TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A, deploying individual firewalls per spoke, increases cost and operational complexity and does not centralize logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or compliance. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. This design supports scalability, operational efficiency, and regulatory compliance, and aligns with AZ-700 best practices. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying existing UDRs, minimizing operational overhead. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and operational efficiency. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP achieves a secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient network architecture for multi-region deployments. Organizations maintain isolation, centralized control, and regulatory compliance while reducing configuration errors and management complexity.

Question 28:

Your organization deploys NVAs across multiple Azure VNets to perform advanced packet inspection. NVAs must exchange routes dynamically with Azure VNets and on-premises networks, without manual UDR configuration. Which solution should be used?

A) Static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, does not scale, and increases operational overhead. Option C, VNet peering with gateway propagation, does not allow bidirectional route learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not propagate routes. Route Server simplifies operational management, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous route propagation even during partial outages. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, providing dynamic, automated routing while integrating NVAs seamlessly. Dynamic routing reduces manual updates, minimizes configuration errors, and ensures that traffic flows through inspection points correctly. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes are propagated without intervention. The design improves operational efficiency, reliability, scalability, and security, enabling enterprise-grade hybrid connectivity and centralized inspection. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when priorities are managed carefully, allowing flexible route control and efficient network management.

Question 29:

You are designing a multi-region Azure network where all internet-bound traffic from multiple VNets must pass through a centralized inspection point. Routes should dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks while maintaining spoke isolation. Which design meets these requirements?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per VNet with static routes
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Deploy Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection, preserving spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway enables dynamic propagation of routes between on-premises and Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates and ensuring consistency. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling through the firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases cost and operational complexity and does not centralize monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but lacks enforced inspection and policy enforcement. High availability is achieved through active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to ensure operational reliability and compliance. New VNets can be connected without reconfiguring UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises changes. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments.

Question 30:

Your company requires NVAs to automatically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks. Routes must propagate dynamically without manual UDR updates. Which solution should be implemented?

A) Configure static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure, removing the need for manual UDR updates. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manually intensive, and does not scale. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited route propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, improves reliability, and ensures consistent route propagation across multi-region VNets and hybrid environments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, apply route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, enabling dynamic routing, centralized inspection, scalable hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency. NVAs remain aware of all reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updated routes, and traffic flows correctly through inspection points. Dynamic route propagation reduces manual management, minimizes configuration errors, and improves security while maintaining network segmentation and compliance. Organizations benefit from a scalable, resilient, and secure network architecture integrating NVAs seamlessly.

Question 31:

Your organization deploys multiple Azure VNets in a hub-and-spoke architecture. The company requires that all outbound internet traffic from spokes be inspected centrally while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual Azure Firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes pointing to the hub
C) Peer VNets across regions using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes pointing to the hub

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Using a BGP-enabled VPN Gateway allows dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates and ensuring consistency as network prefixes change. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing internet-bound traffic through the firewall, which provides TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases cost and operational complexity without providing centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets and relying on system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, route propagation, and firewall health to ensure reliability and compliance. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. This design is scalable because new VNets or regions can connect to the hub without modifying existing UDRs. Centralized inspection supports threat intelligence, auditing, and operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP route propagation reduces operational errors and improves hybrid connectivity. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, isolation, dynamic routing, and scalable hybrid connectivity while reducing manual management overhead. Organizations achieve secure, operationally efficient, and compliant multi-region deployments.

Question 32:

You are designing a multi-region Azure network with multiple NVAs performing packet inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should be implemented?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned prefixes from on-premises while learning system and user routes from Azure automatically, eliminating the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is inefficient, error-prone, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited route propagation but does not provide full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on centralized firewall policy management and does not enable BGP route propagation for NVAs. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance with security policies. High availability ensures continued propagation during failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for dynamic, hybrid, multi-region network deployments. Dynamic routing reduces configuration errors and ensures that traffic flows through inspection points correctly. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes are propagated without intervention. This design improves operational efficiency, reliability, scalability, and security. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when priorities are carefully managed, offering flexible route control. Organizations gain centralized inspection, automated routing, operational efficiency, and secure hybrid connectivity, ensuring compliance and scalability.

Question 33:

Your company requires that all outbound internet traffic from multiple VNets pass through a centralized inspection point while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which design is recommended?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub ensures centralized inspection, preserving spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway allows dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates and ensuring consistency. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases cost and operational complexity without central logging or monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D simplifies connectivity but lacks inspection enforcement and policy control. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, route propagation, and firewall performance. Centralized inspection supports threat intelligence, auditing, and operational efficiency. Dynamic routing ensures on-premises route changes are reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, balancing security, operational efficiency, compliance, and scalability in multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, regulatory compliance, and operational simplicity while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 34:

You are deploying NVAs in Azure VNets to perform advanced packet inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation, allowing NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure. Option A, static UDRs, is manual, error-prone, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited route propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continued propagation even during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing automated, secure, and scalable routing while integrating NVAs seamlessly. Dynamic routing reduces manual updates, prevents configuration errors, and ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure receives updates, and traffic is routed efficiently. The design supports operational efficiency, scalability, reliability, and secure hybrid connectivity. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are managed carefully, providing flexible route control and centralized management.

Question 35:

Your organization needs centralized egress inspection for multiple VNets while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must automatically propagate updates reflecting changes in on-premises networks. Which solution meets these requirements?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases cost and complexity and lacks centralized logging. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall performance, BGP session health, and route propagation to ensure reliability and operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without reconfiguring UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows threat intelligence integration, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices for secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, regulatory compliance, and operational simplicity while reducing manual configuration errors.

Question 36:

Your organization requires that all outbound traffic from multiple Azure VNets is inspected centrally, while spokes remain isolated. Routes must dynamically update as on-premises network prefixes change. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub ensures centralized inspection for all outbound traffic while maintaining isolation between spoke VNets. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway provides dynamic route propagation between on-premises and Azure VNets, eliminating manual UDR updates and ensuring that routing remains accurate as network prefixes change. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, ensuring TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost and does not provide centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets and relying on system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or compliance. High availability is achieved through active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and firewall performance to maintain reliability and compliance. New VNets can be added without reconfiguring existing UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection facilitates auditing, threat intelligence integration, and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling ensures all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP allows dynamic adaptation to on-premises changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Organizations maintain central control, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while preserving spoke isolation and operational simplicity.

Question 37:

Your organization deploys NVAs in multiple Azure VNets to perform advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must automatically learn Azure system and user routes and advertise learned on-premises routes without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while learning system and user routes from Azure automatically, eliminating the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is inefficient, error-prone, and does not scale in dynamic networks. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and does not provide bidirectional exchange for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on centralized firewall policy management and does not enable route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and enables large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing reduces manual configuration, prevents errors, and ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure receives updated routes, and the network remains segmented. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when priorities are configured carefully, offering flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations benefit from automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 38:

You need centralized internet egress inspection for multiple Azure VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, ensuring TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases cost and complexity and lacks centralized logging and monitoring. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is ensured via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall performance, BGP session health, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be connected without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables threat intelligence, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors and management overhead.

Question 39:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets to perform advanced packet inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale. Option C allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices, enabling automated, secure, and scalable routing while integrating NVAs seamlessly. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes are propagated efficiently. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are configured, providing flexible route control and operational efficiency. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 40:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway provides dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost without providing centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is ensured via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple. In a hub-and-spoke topology leveraging Azure Firewall and Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), organizations gain a highly scalable, secure, and operationally efficient network architecture for multi-region deployments. This design centralizes policy enforcement while allowing individual spoke VNets to remain isolated and independently manageable. Administrators can continuously monitor firewall instances, assess their health, review BGP session stability, and analyze route propagation across regions and VNets. Because dynamic BGP routing is enabled, any changes introduced on-premises—such as new subnets, network expansions, or routing policy updates—are automatically reflected within connected Azure VNets without requiring manual route table modifications. This automation reduces operational burden and eliminates the risk of configuration drift.

One of the strongest advantages of this architecture is its inherent scalability. New VNets can be added to the environment without modifying User-Defined Routes (UDRs), since route propagation is handled through route-based VPNs or ExpressRoute circuits that support BGP. This is especially valuable in large enterprises where application teams frequently provision new workloads. The hub acts as a central security and routing point, enabling scalable onboarding processes for new regions, new VNets, and new workloads. It also simplifies lifecycle management for IT operations teams by decoupling security infrastructure from application-specific deployments.

Centralized inspection further strengthens the security posture. By funneling inter-VNet and outbound Internet traffic through Azure Firewall, organizations can enforce unified threat protection rules, perform deep packet inspection, apply custom threat intelligence feeds, and maintain consistency across environments. Whether implementing Layer 3/4 network rules, Layer 7 application rules, or DNS-based filtering, policies can be defined once and applied globally. This not only reduces management overhead but also ensures compliance with internal security guidelines and external regulatory standards. When combined with Azure Firewall Premium, advanced capabilities such as TLS inspection, IDPS (Intrusion Detection and Prevention System), URL filtering, and certificate-based authentication further enhance the security model.

Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic routes through the hub, guaranteeing complete visibility across outbound flows. This is essential for regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, and government, where all outgoing traffic must be logged, monitored, and inspected. Organizations benefit from consistent logging via Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, and Microsoft Sentinel, enabling robust auditing, anomaly detection, incident investigation, and long-term forensic analysis. Integration with Sentinel also supports automated workflows for handling threats, alerts, and compliance issues.

This architecture supports operational efficiency by reducing complexities associated with decentralized firewalls or distributed network security solutions. Instead of deploying firewalls in each spoke or region, a central Azure Firewall—scaled via availability zones and firewall policy hierarchies—can serve multiple workloads while maintaining consistent governance. Firewall Policy, a global resource, enables versioning, rule reuse, inheritance, and central management across multiple firewalls and regions, which is particularly beneficial in geographically distributed organizations.

The hub-and-spoke design using Azure Firewall and BGP also enhances business continuity. Multi-region deployment allows traffic to be replicated or fail over to secondary regions in the event of outages. With redundant VPN or ExpressRoute circuits, BGP sessions automatically reroute around failures, ensuring uninterrupted connectivity. Azure Firewall’s active/active configuration and zone redundancy further strengthen resilience.