Microsoft AZ-700  Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 3 Q41-60

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 41:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple Azure VNets across regions while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes inspection for all outbound traffic while preserving spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway enables dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating manual UDR updates and ensuring routing accuracy as network prefixes change. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases cost and operational complexity and does not offer centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets with system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and firewall performance to maintain reliability and compliance. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises changes. New VNets can be added without reconfiguring UDRs, supporting scalability. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments.

Question 42:

Your company deploys NVAs in Azure VNets to perform advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must automatically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while learning system and user routes from Azure automatically, eliminating manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic network environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited route propagation and is not bidirectional for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with regulatory and security requirements. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows through inspection points correctly, reduces configuration errors, and maintains network segmentation. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are carefully configured, offering flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations benefit from automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 43:

You need centralized egress inspection for multiple Azure VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must automatically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost without providing centralized logging or monitoring. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is ensured via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows threat intelligence, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 44:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets to inspect traffic for multiple spokes. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation, enabling NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale for dynamic networks. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale enterprise deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filters, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continued route propagation even during failures. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing automated, secure, and scalable routing while integrating NVAs seamlessly. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are configured correctly, providing flexible route control and operational efficiency. Organizations achieve reliable, secure, and scalable hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 45:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases cost and complexity and lacks centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to ensure reliability and operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables threat intelligence integration, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices for secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 46:

Your organization needs all outbound traffic from multiple Azure VNets to pass through a centralized inspection point while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically update as on-premises network prefixes change. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection for multiple VNets while maintaining spoke isolation. Using a BGP-enabled VPN Gateway allows dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates and ensuring that routing remains accurate as network prefixes change. UDRs in each spoke enforce forced tunneling, directing internet-bound traffic to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity and cost without providing centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets and relying on system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. High availability is achieved through active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall performance, BGP session health, and route propagation. Centralized inspection allows integration with threat intelligence, auditing, and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling ensures all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP dynamically adapts to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying existing UDRs, supporting scalability and operational simplicity. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, regulatory compliance, and reduces manual management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 47:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets to perform advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must automatically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while learning system and user routes from Azure automatically, eliminating the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited route propagation and does not provide bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not enable route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale enterprise deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with regulatory and security policies. High availability ensures continuous route propagation even during partial failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows through inspection points correctly, reduces configuration errors, and maintains network segmentation. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are carefully configured, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations benefit from automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 48:

You need centralized egress inspection for multiple Azure VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must automatically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost without providing centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation requirements. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables threat intelligence integration, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 49:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets to inspect traffic for multiple spokes. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation, enabling NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale for dynamic networks. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale enterprise deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filters, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continued propagation even during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing automated, secure, and scalable routing while integrating NVAs seamlessly. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are configured correctly, providing flexible route control and operational efficiency. Organizations achieve reliable, secure, and scalable hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 50:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases cost and complexity and lacks centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to ensure reliability and operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables threat intelligence integration, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices for secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 51:

Your organization requires centralized outbound traffic inspection for multiple VNets while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, removing the need for manual UDR updates and ensuring accurate routing. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, enabling TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases cost and operational complexity and does not centralize logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets and relying on system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is provided via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and firewall performance to ensure operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises changes. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall provides centralized control, reduces management overhead, and maintains operational simplicity while preserving spoke isolation.

Question 52:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets to inspect traffic from multiple spokes. NVAs must automatically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure, eliminating manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is manual, error-prone, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and is not bidirectional for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security policies. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during failures. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing reduces configuration errors, ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, and maintains network segmentation. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when route priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations benefit from automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 53:

You need centralized egress inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized logging or monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall performance, BGP session health, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 54:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure, eliminating manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and is not bidirectional for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filters, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continued propagation during partial failures. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces errors, and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server supports coexistence with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 55:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases cost and operational complexity and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables threat intelligence, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 56:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple Azure VNets across regions while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while preserving spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway allows dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates and ensuring accurate routing as network prefixes change. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all egress traffic through the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C, peering VNets with system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees that all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to changes in on-premises networks. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 57:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets, allowing NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure. This eliminates the need for manual UDR updates. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic network environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures that traffic flows through inspection points correctly, reduces configuration errors, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive route updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured correctly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations gain automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 58:

You need centralized outbound inspection for multiple Azure VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, removing the need for manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 59:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and operational efficiency. Organizations achieve secure, reliable, and scalable hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 60:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke

Deploying an Azure Firewall instance in every spoke VNet provides the highest degree of isolation because each workload operates behind its own dedicated security boundary. This model can meet stringent compliance or security requirements where workloads must not share a common inspection point. However, while this design improves isolation, it significantly increases operational complexity, management overhead, and cost. Teams must replicate policies, manage lifecycle operations independently, and handle distributed logging and monitoring. Over time, this approach becomes difficult to scale, especially in multi-region or rapidly expanding environments.

Key Points

Advantages

Strongest VNet-level isolation

Suitable for highly regulated workloads (PCI, HIPAA, government)

Independent policy enforcement per workload or business unit

Disadvantages

Very high cost due to multiple Azure Firewall instances

Policy duplication and administrative overhead

Inefficient scaling for multi-region deployments

Increased east-west traffic inspection complexity

B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

This is the most widely recommended architecture in Microsoft’s AZ-700 guidance. Centralizing Azure Firewall in the hub provides a unified security layer and simplifies management across all spokes. With a BGP-enabled VPN Gateway or ExpressRoute Gateway, on-premises routes dynamically propagate into the hub, reducing manual route table maintenance. UDRs in spokes ensure all inbound, outbound, and east-west traffic is consistently inspected through the hub firewall. This model supports forced tunneling, unified monitoring, centralized logging, and consistent rule enforcement across regions.

Key Points

Advantages

Centralized firewall policy and threat protection

Dynamic BGP routing simplifies route management

Supports forced tunneling and consistent outbound control

Reduced cost compared to firewalls per spoke

Scales efficiently across regions and workloads

Simplifies auditing, compliance, and governance

Supports Azure Firewall Premium features (TLS inspection, IDPS, URL filtering)

Disadvantages

Hub may become a choke point without proper scaling

Requires UDRs in spokes for traffic redirection

Slightly more complex initial setup than basic peering

C) Peer VNets using system routes

Using only VNet peering with system routes is the simplest configuration. It relies entirely on Azure’s default routing behavior, with no network virtual appliances, firewalls, or custom UDRs. While this model offers low cost and straightforward connectivity, it lacks centralized inspection and does not provide forced tunneling or consistent policy enforcement. Traffic flows freely between peered VNets, making it unsuitable for regulated or security-sensitive environments. Additionally, system routes offer limited flexibility for traffic manipulation, segmentation, or inspection.

Key Points

Advantages

Simplest configuration with minimal overhead

No firewall or gateway costs

Low latency and high throughput between VNets

Disadvantages

No centralized security inspection or policy enforcement

Cannot enforce outbound control or forced tunneling

Does not meet enterprise security or compliance requirements

Limited visibility and monitoring of traffic flows

D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Deploying an Azure Virtual WAN with unsecured (basic) hubs provides a globally distributed networking fabric with simplified connectivity management. However, unsecured hubs lack built-in security inspection, threat protection, or advanced firewalling. They are appropriate only for organizations needing simplified routing across global sites without central security enforcement. To achieve enterprise-grade security, a secured Virtual WAN hub with Azure Firewall Manager integration is required. Using an unsecured hub alone provides connectivity but not security, making it unsuitable for regulated or sensitive workloads.

Key Points

Advantages

Simplified global connectivity and routing

Ideal for SD-WAN or distributed branch connectivity

Automated route management and WAN optimization

Disadvantages

No security inspection or firewall capabilities in unsecured hubs

Cannot enforce threat detection, TLS inspection, or IDPS

Not suitable for compliance-driven environments

Requires secured hubs for enterprise-grade protection