Microsoft AZ-700  Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 4 Q61-80

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 61:

Your organization requires centralized inspection for outbound traffic from multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. Using a BGP-enabled VPN Gateway allows dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating manual UDR updates and ensuring accurate routing as network prefixes change. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all egress traffic through the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity and cost without centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to ensure operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees that all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 62:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic, bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure, eliminating manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic network environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and is not bidirectional for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures that traffic flows through inspection points correctly, reduces configuration errors, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive route updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations gain automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 63:

You need centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating the need for manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or policy compliance. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 64:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?
A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 65:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 66:

Your organization requires centralized outbound traffic inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, removing the need for manual UDR updates and ensuring accurate routing. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing internet-bound traffic through the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost and does not provide centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is provided via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees that all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 67:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets, allowing NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure. This eliminates the need for manual UDR updates. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic network environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive route updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations gain automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 68:

You need centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 69:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 70:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 71:

Your organization needs centralized inspection for outbound traffic from multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. Using a BGP-enabled VPN Gateway allows dynamic propagation of routes between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates and ensuring accurate routing. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing internet-bound traffic through the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity and cost without centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees that all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 72:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets, allowing NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure. This eliminates the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic network environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive route updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations gain automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 73:

You need centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 74:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 75:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 76:

Your organization needs centralized outbound traffic inspection for multiple VNets while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs

B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while preserving spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, directing all internet-bound traffic for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance enforcement. Option A, deploying individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and lacks centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 77:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets, allowing NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure. This eliminates the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive route updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations gain automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 78:

You need centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 79:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Option B is the correct answer because deploying Azure Route Server and peering Network Virtual Appliances (NVAs) using BGP provides a fully dynamic, scalable, and automated routing solution within Azure virtual networks. Azure Route Server allows NVAs to exchange routing information directly with Azure’s routing plane, enabling automatic updates whenever a route changes in the network or on-premises environment. This fundamentally improves reliability, simplifies operations, and eliminates the need for manual route configuration. With BGP-based dynamic routing, any route learned by an NVA can be propagated into the VNet, and Azure’s platform routes can be advertised back to the appliance. This ensures that traffic always follows the most efficient and up-to-date path.

Another advantage of Azure Route Server is improved resiliency and high availability. In traditional static-route environments, if an NVA fails or becomes unavailable, traffic may be blackholed or require manual intervention to update User-Defined Routes. With BGP, failover happens automatically because Azure and the NVAs detect when a peer stops advertising routes, and the system shifts traffic to the remaining available appliances. This allows NVAs to run in active-active or active-standby configurations without complex routing logic. Azure Route Server simplifies multi-NVA topologies, supports SD-WAN solutions, and reduces operational friction in environments that require frequent routing changes.

Option A, which relies on static User-Defined Routes for NVAs, is limited by manual configuration requirements and a lack of dynamic adaptation. Static UDRs work only in small or simple environments where routes rarely change and failover scenarios are limited. As soon as new prefixes must be added, removed, or updated, administrators must manually modify UDR entries, which leads to configuration drift and increased risk of misconfiguration. Static routing also cannot automatically detect NVA failures, which can result in downtime or traffic being routed incorrectly. In a modern cloud network where workloads scale dynamically and hybrid connectivity changes frequently, static UDRs do not provide the flexibility or reliability needed.

Option C involves enabling VNet peering with propagated gateway routes. While VNet peering allows gateway route propagation from a hub to its spokes, it does not address the need for dynamic routing between NVAs and the Azure routing plane. Peering does not provide the capability for NVAs inside a VNet to exchange BGP routes with Azure itself. It only passes on-premises routes learned through a gateway to other peered VNets. This option does not enable the NVA to dynamically influence routing decisions or advertise custom prefixes. Therefore, although useful for extending hybrid connectivity, it does not solve the core requirement for dynamic and automated routing to NVAs.

Option D proposes using Azure Firewall Manager, which is designed for centralizing management of Azure Firewall policies or Virtual WAN secure hubs. While powerful for managing large-scale firewall deployments, Firewall Manager does not replace dynamic routing capabilities. It does not provide NVAs with the ability to peer using BGP or influence route propagation. Firewall Manager helps enforce consistent security policies, but it is not a routing control plane and cannot fulfill requirements related to learning or advertising routes through BGP.

For these reasons, deploying Azure Route Server and establishing BGP peering with NVAs is the most appropriate, scalable, and resilient solution.

Question 80:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.