Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q81-100

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 81:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while preserving spoke isolation. The BGP-enabled VPN Gateway enables dynamic route propagation between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating manual UDR updates and ensuring accurate routing as network prefixes change. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing internet-bound traffic through the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, deploying individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, costand does not provide centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory requirements. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to changes in on-premises networks. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 82:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for advanced traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure, eliminating the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive route updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations gain automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 83:

You need centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 84:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 85:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 86:

Your organization needs centralized outbound traffic inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates from on-premises networks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in the hub and BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. A BGP-enabled VPN Gateway dynamically propagates routes between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating manual UDR updates and ensuring accurate routing. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing internet-bound traffic through the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, deploying firewalls per spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost and does not provide centralized logging or monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory requirements. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets or regions can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 87:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routing information with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static UDRs pointing to NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets, allowing NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes while automatically learning system and user routes from Azure. This eliminates the need for manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, inflexible, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management and does not provide dynamic route propagation. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid and multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while enhancing operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures traffic flows correctly through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive route updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control and centralized management. Organizations gain automated routing, centralized inspection, secure hybrid connectivity, and operational efficiency.

Question 88:

You need centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically propagate updates reflecting on-premises network changes. Which design should you implement?

A) Deploy firewalls in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway propagates routes dynamically from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall, providing TLS inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance enforcement. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring or logging. Option C bypasses centralized inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation to maintain operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling ensures that all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP provides centralized control, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance while minimizing configuration errors.

Question 89:

Your organization deploys NVAs in Azure VNets for traffic inspection. NVAs must dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Static UDRs for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables bidirectional BGP route propagation between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure without manual UDR configuration. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, manual, and does not scale in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, allows limited propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, focuses on firewall policy management but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, configure route filtering, and maintain compliance. High availability ensures continuous propagation during failures. This solution aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid, multi-region networks, integrating NVAs seamlessly while improving operational efficiency, scalability, and security. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces configuration errors, and preserves network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured properly, providing flexible route control. Organizations achieve scalable, reliable, and secure hybrid connectivity while maintaining centralized inspection and compliance.

Question 90:

Your organization requires centralized outbound inspection for multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution is optimal?

A) Deploy individual firewalls per spoke
B) Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall in hub, BGP-enabled VPN Gateway, and UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with Azure Firewall in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. BGP-enabled VPN Gateway ensures dynamic propagation of routes from on-premises networks to Azure VNets, eliminating manual updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to the hub firewall for TLS inspection, logging, threat detection, and compliance monitoring. Option A increases operational complexity and cost and does not provide centralized monitoring. Option C bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D simplifies connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved via active-active VPN Gateways and multiple firewall instances. Administrators can monitor firewall health, BGP session status, and route propagation. Dynamic BGP routing ensures that on-premises route changes are automatically reflected in Azure VNets. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Hub-and-spoke with Azure Firewall and BGP ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, regulatory compliance, and reduced management overhead while maintaining spoke isolation.

Question 91:

Your organization needs to route traffic from multiple VNets through a centralized NVA while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect on-premises network changes. Which solution should you implement?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Route Server and NVAs in the hub, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Implement hub-and-spoke with Azure Route Server and NVAs in the hub, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke design centralizes traffic inspection while maintaining isolation of spoke VNets. By deploying NVAs in the hub and integrating with Azure Route Server, routes dynamically propagate between on-premises networks and Azure VNets via BGP. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring that outbound traffic passes through the hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and compliance monitoring. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and cost while offering no central monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity without enforcing inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA health to ensure operational efficiency and compliance. Centralized inspection allows for threat intelligence integration, auditing, and regulatory compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. The solution ensures centralized control, reduced management overhead, and operational simplicity while preserving spoke isolation.

Question 92:

Your organization requires dynamic routing between VNets and on-premises networks using NVAs. Routes should automatically propagate and adjust to network changes without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Use static UDRs for all routes
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated gateway routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables dynamic bidirectional route propagation using BGP between NVAs and Azure VNets. NVAs can advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically receive system and user routes from Azure VNets, removing the need for manual UDR updates. Option A, static UDRs, is error-prone, does not scale, and increases management overhead. Option C, VNet peering with propagated gateway routes, supports limited propagation but does not allow full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, provides policy management for Azure Firewalls but does not handle dynamic route propagation for NVAs. Using Route Server reduces operational complexity, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale multi-region deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous route propagation even during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through inspection points, reduces misconfigurations, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of all reachable prefixes, Azure VNets receive route updates automatically, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid networks, supporting centralized inspection, scalability, operational efficiency, and secure connectivity. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, centralized traffic inspection, and streamlined operations.

Question 93:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized outbound traffic inspection through NVAs. Spokes must maintain isolation, and routes must adapt to on-premises changes automatically. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke topology centralizes inspection while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs in the hub inspect all traffic, while Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes using BGP between on-premises networks and Azure VNets, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure outbound traffic flows through NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs per spoke with static routes, increases management complexity, cost, and reduces operational efficiency. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to ensure compliance and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. Dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic updates to reflect on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risks. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, scalability, security, operational simplicity, and regulatory compliance. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement. The design provides a scalable, resilient, and secure multi-region deployment suitable for enterprise workloads requiring centralized traffic inspection.

Question 94:

Your organization needs to enable NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?
A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes require constant manual updates and do not scale, making Option A unsuitable. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, supports limited propagation and lacks full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages policies but does not propagate routes. Dynamic BGP routing through Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale multi-region deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reducing misconfiguration risk and maintaining proper segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets receive updates automatically, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 95:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while maintaining isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server enables dynamic route propagation using BGP between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases management complexity, operational overhead, and cost. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but lacks security policy enforcement. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees all egress traffic is inspected, while dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic updates reflecting on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance. The design ensures centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and reduced management overhead.

Question 96:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic from multiple VNets through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect on-premises network changes. Which architecture should you implement?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server enables dynamic BGP route propagation between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all outbound traffic flows through hub NVAs for TLS inspection, logging, and compliance monitoring. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and lacks centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies or centralized inspection. High availability is achieved with multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling ensures inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP guarantees dynamic adaptation to on-premises changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance. The design delivers centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and reduced management overhead.

Question 97:

Your organization requires NVAs to dynamically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks, automatically adapting to network changes. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets via BGP. Static routes (Option A) require constant manual updates and are error-prone, limiting scalability. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale multi-region deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured, offering flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid networks, enabling centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 98:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized outbound traffic inspection through NVAs. Spokes must maintain isolation, and routes must adapt to on-premises network changes automatically. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound inspection through NVAs in the hub while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes using BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring outbound traffic flows through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases management complexity, operational overhead, and cost. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce security policies or centralized inspection. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance for operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. Dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic updates reflecting on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risks. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing centralized control, scalability, security, operational simplicity, and compliance. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance.

Question 99:

Your organization needs NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets via BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale effectively. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages policies but does not propagate routes. Dynamic BGP routing through Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale multi-region deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through inspection points, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 100:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. Azure Route Server allows dynamic BGP route propagation between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for TLS inspection, logging, and compliance monitoring. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and lacks centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved with multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance. The architecture provides centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and reduced management overhead.