Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q121-140

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 121:

Your organization wants to ensure all outbound traffic from multiple VNets passes through a centralized inspection point while preserving spoke isolation. Routes should automatically update when on-premises network changes occur. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke design centralizes outbound traffic inspection in the hub NVAs, ensuring that all traffic from spokes is monitored for security, compliance, and operational logging. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes using BGP between hub NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks. This eliminates the need for manual UDR updates whenever network changes occur. UDRs in the spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all outbound traffic through hub NVAs, enabling inspection of all egress traffic, logging for audit purposes, and compliance with corporate and regulatory requirements. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, requires higher management effort, and lacks centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection, violating isolation and security requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or centralized security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalable deployments, and compliance support. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, ensuring easy scalability. Centralized inspection allows threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, auditing, and consistent operational monitoring.

Question 122:

Your organization requires NVAs to dynamically learn and advertise routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes using BGP, ensuring dynamic propagation of network changes between Azure VNets and on-premises networks. This eliminates manual route configuration, reduces operational errors, and simplifies large-scale hybrid deployments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone and requires frequent manual updates, which is not feasible for dynamic, multi-region networks. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Using Azure Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports scalability. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures that route propagation continues during partial failures, while dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, allowing flexible route control. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified network management.

Option B, deploying Azure Route Server and peering Network Virtual Appliances using BGP, provides the most reliable and scalable approach for dynamic routing in Azure environments. Azure Route Server integrates directly into Azure’s control plane and allows NVAs such as firewalls, SD-WAN appliances, and routing devices to exchange routing information with Azure through BGP. This enables fully automated route learning, rapid convergence during failover, and consistent routing across hybrid and cloud segments. When on-premises networks advertise new prefixes via VPN or ExpressRoute, NVAs immediately learn these updates and can advertise routes back into Azure. This improves operational efficiency and eliminates the need for manual changes to User-Defined Routes. The continuous exchange of routing information ensures NVAs stay synchronized with Azure’s evolving network structure, which is critical in large or dynamic environments.

Key points for Option B
• Supports dynamic route learning using BGP
• Ensures automatic updates when on-premises or cloud routes change
• Reduces operational overhead by removing manual UDR maintenance
• Provides rapid failover and route convergence when NVAs go offline
• Improves scalability in hybrid, hub-and-spoke, and multi-region architectures
• Allows NVAs to remain aware of all reachable prefixes
• Enhances segmentation and security by controlling route advertisements
• Works alongside UDRs when route priorities require fine-grained control
• Aligns with AZ-700 best practices for dynamic routing and operational efficiency

Option C, enabling VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides basic route propagation but lacks the bidirectional learning needed for advanced routing scenarios involving NVAs. VNet peering allows hub gateways to propagate routes into spoke VNets, enabling Azure subnets to learn on-premises prefixes through gateway transit. However, this mechanism is one-directional. While Azure can propagate system routes across VNets, NVAs inside a VNet cannot use peering to advertise their own routes back to Azure. This prevents NVAs from influencing the routing table and stops them from dynamically inserting new prefixes. Organizations relying on NVAs for hybrid routing, custom segmentation, or traffic inspection find this approach too limited. VNet peering helps extend connectivity, but is not a true routing protocol and cannot replace BGP or dynamic route exchange.

Key points for Option C
• Allows system routes to propagate from hub to spoke via peering
• Does not provide route advertisement from NVAs back to Azure
• Cannot dynamically update routes when prefixes change
• Only suitable for simple hybrid or intra-VNet routing scenarios
• Does not support dynamic failover or active-active NVA designs
• Lacks the flexibility needed for SD-WAN or multi-NVA architectures

Option D, using Azure Firewall Manager, is focused on centralizing the management of Azure Firewall policies rather than controlling routing. Firewall Manager helps administrators maintain consistent firewall rules, DNS settings, and threat-intelligence configurations across multiple Azure Firewall deployments and Virtual WAN secured hubs. It plays an important role in large security deployments but does not participate in route distribution, dynamic routing protocols, or the exchange of prefixes. Azure Firewall Manager cannot replace BGP or act as a routing control plane. It is complementary but not sufficient for environments requiring dynamic routing, NVA awareness of hybrid prefixes, or automatic propagation of new networks. Organizations may use Firewall Manager for policy governance, but still require Azure Route Server for dynamic routing.

Key points for Option D
• Manages Azure Firewall policies and configurations
• Does not advertise or learn routes
• Cannot participate in BGP or dynamic routing
• Helpful for policy centralization but not traffic engineering
• Does not solve hybrid routing or NVA path-selection needs

Question 123:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection through hub NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. NVAs inspect traffic for security, compliance, and operational monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes via BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, cost, and management effort while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 124:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are prone to errors, require constant manual updates, and do not scale for dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risks, and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and streamlined network management.

Question 125:

Your organization needs centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 126:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic from multiple VNets through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes should automatically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke design centralizes outbound traffic inspection in hub NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates whenever network changes occur. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all outbound traffic through hub NVAs for inspection, threat monitoring, logging, and compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and cost while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or centralized security policies. High availability is achieved with multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, and compliance support. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, and consistent policy enforcement. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, ensuring easy scalability and operational efficiency.

Question 127:

Your organization requires NVAs to dynamically learn and advertise routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement.

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes using BGP, allowing dynamic propagation between Azure VNets and on-premises networks. This eliminates manual route configuration, reduces operational errors, and simplifies large-scale hybrid deployments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, requires constant manual updates, and does not scale for dynamic, multi-region environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Using a Route Server ensures consistent routing, reduces operational overhead, and supports scalability. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory standards. High availability ensures continuous propagation during partial failures, while dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified network management.

Question 128:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound inspection through hub NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs inspect traffic for compliance, security, and operational monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes via BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, cost, and management effort while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 129:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require frequent manual updates, and do not scale in dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 130:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 131:

Your organization wants to ensure that all outbound traffic from multiple VNets is inspected through a centralized point while preserving spoke isolation. Routes should dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke design centralizes outbound traffic inspection using NVAs in the hub while maintaining isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes using BGP between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR configuration whenever network changes occur. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, threat monitoring, logging, and compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and management effort while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce centralized security policies. High availability is ensured with multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, ensuring operational efficiency and scalability.

Question 132:

Your organization needs NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement?
A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. This eliminates the need for manual configuration, reduces operational errors, and supports dynamic hybrid environments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, requires frequent manual updates, and does not scale for multi-region deployments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Using Route Server ensures routing consistency, reduces operational overhead, and supports scalable deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures, while dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 133:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection through NVAs in the hub while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs perform traffic inspection for security, compliance, and operational monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and compliance purposes. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and costs, while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 134:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale for dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 135:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 136:

Your organization wants all outbound traffic from multiple VNets to be inspected through a centralized point while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must automatically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke design centralizes outbound traffic inspection using NVAs in the hub while maintaining isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR updates whenever network changes occur. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, threat monitoring, logging, and compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and management effort while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce centralized security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, enabling operational efficiency and scalability.

Question 137:

Your organization requires NVAs to dynamically learn and advertise routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes using BGP, enabling dynamic propagation between Azure VNets and on-premises networks. This eliminates manual configuration, reduces operational errors, and supports hybrid environments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, requires frequent manual updates, and does not scale for multi-region deployments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Using Route Server ensures routing consistency, reduces operational overhead, and supports scalable deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures, while dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 138:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection through hub NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs inspect traffic for compliance, security, and operational monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and costs, while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 139:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale in dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 140:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.