Microsoft SC-200 Microsoft Security Operations Analyst Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q81-100

Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-200 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 81:

Your organization wants to block access to Microsoft 365 apps from risky sign-ins detected due to leaked credentials or unusual locations. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection helps organizations detect risky sign-ins and compromised accounts using machine learning, anomaly detection, and threat intelligence. Risk factors include leaked credentials, impossible travel between locations, unusual device usage, and unfamiliar sign-in patterns.

Administrators can configure sign-in risk policies to automatically enforce MFA or block access when a sign-in is flagged as high-risk. Similarly, user risk policies can trigger password resets for accounts exhibiting elevated risk scores. This automated, adaptive approach ensures that potentially compromised accounts cannot access sensitive resources while minimizing disruptions for legitimate users.

Integration with Conditional Access enables organizations to enforce adaptive access policies based on risk context. For example, a sign-in from a new country may require MFA or block access, whereas normal sign-ins from trusted corporate devices proceed seamlessly. Detailed audit logs provide visibility into risk events, policy enforcement, and remediation actions, supporting both incident response and compliance requirements.

Other solutions do not offer automated risk-based access enforcement. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors cloud activity but does not enforce MFA. Microsoft Information Protection protects content but does not manage sign-in risk. Defender for Office 365 protects against malware and phishing, but cannot remediate compromised accounts.

In practice, Azure AD Identity Protection provides organizations with continuous monitoring of user sign-ins and account activity to detect potential security risks in real time. By analyzing a wide range of signals—including unusual locations, atypical device usage, impossible travel scenarios, leaked credentials, and anomalous sign-in patterns—Identity Protection can accurately identify accounts that may be compromised or under attack. When such risks are detected, the service enables administrators to take automated mitigation actions, such as requiring multi-factor authentication, enforcing password resets, or blocking access temporarily. This ensures that potential threats are addressed immediately, minimizing the window of opportunity for attackers.

Identity Protection integrates seamlessly with Conditional Access policies, allowing organizations to implement adaptive authentication. For example, low-risk sign-ins from familiar devices or trusted locations may proceed without interruption, while high-risk sign-ins trigger additional verification steps. This adaptive approach balances security and usability, ensuring that legitimate users can continue their work without unnecessary friction while suspicious activity is effectively contained. Policies can also be tailored to target specific user groups, roles, or applications, providing granular control over risk mitigation strategies.

Beyond real-time protection, Identity Protection provides detailed reporting and auditing capabilities. Security teams can track trends in risky sign-ins, monitor the effectiveness of risk policies, and gain insight into remediated accounts. Integration with Microsoft 365 security tools and SIEM solutions allows alerts and logs to be centralized, facilitating rapid incident response and investigation. Automated remediation workflows reduce administrative overhead and ensure that high-risk accounts are managed consistently and efficiently.

By continuously monitoring user behavior, assessing risk, and applying adaptive mitigation, Identity Protection helps organizations prevent account takeovers, safeguard sensitive resources, and maintain compliance with security standards and regulatory requirements. This proactive, intelligent approach strengthens the organization’s overall security posture while preserving a smooth and productive user experience, ensuring that authorized users have seamless access to resources even as threats are detected and mitigated in real time.

Question 82:

Your organization wants to automatically classify emails containing personally identifiable information (PII) and prevent them from being sent externally. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) allows organizations to detect, classify, and protect sensitive content, including PII like social security numbers, credit card numbers, and personal health information. Administrators can define policies using predefined sensitive information types or custom rules to detect PII across emails, documents, and SharePoint content.

Once PII is detected, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict external sharing, and provide detailed audit logs. For example, if a payroll email containing SSNs is addressed to an external recipient, MIP automatically prevents the email from being sent and encrypts the content, ensuring compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or internal policies.

Automation ensures consistent enforcement without relying on user intervention, reducing the risk of accidental data leaks. Audit logs enable visibility into who accessed or attempted to share sensitive information, supporting compliance reporting and internal investigations.

Other solutions are insufficient for content-specific protection. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies but cannot detect content. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors activity but does not automatically classify content. Defender for Endpoint protects devices but does not enforce content-level PII protection.

In practice, Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) provides organizations with a comprehensive and automated approach to protecting personally identifiable information (PII) and other sensitive data. By integrating classification, labeling, encryption, and rights management, MIP ensures that sensitive content is consistently protected across Microsoft 365 services and compatible third-party applications. Policies can be configured to automatically detect sensitive information, such as Social Security numbers, financial account details, health records, or other personal identifiers, and apply protection measures without requiring user intervention. This automation reduces the likelihood of human error and ensures that sensitive data is secured consistently across the organization.

MIP’s labeling capabilities allow organizations to define levels of sensitivity, such as public, internal, confidential, or highly confidential, and automatically enforce corresponding protection controls. For example, documents labeled as highly confidential can be encrypted, restricted to authorized users, and prevented from being forwarded or copied outside of the organization. Similarly, emails containing PII can be automatically encrypted and restricted, preventing accidental or intentional data leaks while still allowing legitimate collaboration. By embedding protection directly into the content, MIP ensures that the safeguards persist even if the file is downloaded, shared externally, or moved to unmanaged devices.

Beyond protection, MIP also supports auditing and reporting to monitor access and usage of sensitive information. Administrators can track who accessed or attempted to access protected documents and emails, providing visibility into potential misuse, insider threats, or policy violations. This is particularly important for compliance with regulatory frameworks such as GDPR, HIPAA, CCPA, or ISO standards, which require organizations to demonstrate accountability and control over sensitive personal information. Alerts and audit logs can be integrated with Microsoft 365 compliance tools or SIEM solutions, allowing security and compliance teams to respond promptly to anomalous activities.

MIP also enhances productivity by allowing authorized users to perform their work without unnecessary interruptions. Automated labeling and protection are applied transparently in the background, ensuring that users can collaborate, edit, and share files while the organization’s security policies remain enforced. Conditional policies can also be applied based on user location, device compliance, or application context, providing additional flexibility and adaptive protection for different workflows. This ensures that security measures are balanced with usability, maintaining operational efficiency while protecting sensitive data.

By combining automated detection, persistent content protection, auditing, and adaptive policy enforcement, MIP helps organizations maintain a strong security posture and regulatory compliance. It mitigates the risk of data breaches, accidental disclosures, and unauthorized access, while supporting secure collaboration and operational productivity. Overall, MIP provides a proactive, intelligent framework for safeguarding PII and other sensitive data throughout its lifecycle, enabling organizations to protect critical information effectively without disrupting everyday business processes.

Question 83:

Your organization wants to detect and respond to anomalous user behavior in Microsoft 365, such as large downloads or unusual sharing. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Microsoft Cloud App Security

Explanation:

Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides behavioral analytics and anomaly detection across Microsoft 365 and other cloud applications. It monitors user activity, establishes baseline behavior profiles, and identifies suspicious patterns such as mass downloads, unusual sharing, or access from unfamiliar devices.

Once anomalies are detected, administrators can define real-time automated responses, including blocking downloads, restricting sharing, sending alerts, or quarantining files. For example, if a user downloads hundreds of sensitive financial files after hours, MCAS can immediately block further downloads and notify security personnel for investigation.

Integration with Conditional Access App Control enables session-level enforcement based on device type, location, or risk. Detailed logs support auditing and compliance reporting, ensuring organizations can track activity and respond to potential insider threats or compromised accounts.

Other solutions do not provide real-time monitoring of user behavior. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies at sign-in but does not track ongoing activity. Microsoft Information Protection labels content but does not detect anomalies in user actions. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not monitor cloud application behavior.

In practice, Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides organizations with proactive detection and mitigation of insider threats by continuously monitoring user activity, access patterns, and file interactions across cloud applications. By analyzing behavior in real time, MCAS can identify anomalies such as unusual file downloads, mass document sharing, or access from unexpected locations or devices. When suspicious activity is detected, administrators can take immediate action to block or restrict access, enforce session controls, or alert security teams. This ensures that sensitive content, such as intellectual property, financial data, or personal information, is protected before it can be exfiltrated or misused.

MCAS also allows organizations to apply granular policies that differentiate between trusted and high-risk users or devices. For example, users accessing data from corporate-managed, compliant devices may have full access to collaborate and share files, while users on unmanaged or risky devices may have restricted read-only access or be required to complete additional verification. This adaptive control maintains productivity for authorized users while enforcing security measures for potentially risky activities, ensuring that security does not impede normal workflows.

Beyond real-time enforcement, MCAS provides comprehensive auditing and reporting capabilities. Security teams can track who accessed sensitive information, which actions were taken, and any attempted policy violations. These insights support regulatory compliance, enable rapid investigation of potential incidents, and facilitate continuous improvement of security policies. Alerts can be integrated with Microsoft Sentinel or other SIEM systems, providing centralized visibility and streamlined incident response.

By combining continuous monitoring, adaptive access controls, automated remediation, and detailed audit logs, MCAS ensures that insider threats are detected and mitigated proactively. Organizations benefit from reduced risk of data leaks, stronger protection of sensitive information, and compliance with regulatory standards, all while allowing trusted users and devices to operate efficiently. This proactive, intelligent approach to cloud security helps maintain a balance between operational productivity and robust protection of critical organizational data.

Question 84:

Your organization wants to classify healthcare documents containing PHI and prevent external sharing while maintaining internal access. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to automatically classify and protect sensitive content, including personal health information (PHI). Using predefined sensitive information types or custom policies, MIP can detect healthcare-related data across Microsoft 365 applications.

When PHI is detected, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict access to authorized users, and prevent external sharing. For example, if a nurse uploads a patient record to SharePoint and attempts to share it externally, MIP automatically restricts access to internal authorized personnel, preventing data leakage.

Automation ensures consistent policy enforcement without relying on user action, reducing the risk of accidental exposure. Detailed audit logs provide insight into access attempts, sharing events, and policy enforcement, supporting compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and internal regulations.

Other solutions do not provide automated content classification and protection. Azure AD Conditional Access controls access but cannot detect PHI. MCAS monitors activity but does not automatically label sensitive data. Defender for Office 365 protects endpoints but does not enforce content-level policies.

In practice, Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) ensures that sensitive healthcare information, such as electronic health records, patient medical histories, lab results, and insurance data, is consistently protected across an organization’s digital environment. By automatically classifying and labeling sensitive content, MIP can apply persistent protections, including encryption, access restrictions, and rights management. These protections travel with the data, ensuring that even if it is shared externally or moved to unmanaged devices, only authorized personnel can access or modify the information. This helps mitigate both insider threats and external risks, reducing the likelihood of accidental exposure or malicious misuse of sensitive healthcare data.

MIP also integrates with core Microsoft 365 applications, such as Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, and OneDrive, providing seamless protection across email communications, document collaboration, and storage platforms. For example, when a physician sends a patient report via email, MIP can automatically encrypt the message, restrict forwarding, and require authentication for recipients. Similarly, confidential documents stored in SharePoint or OneDrive can be labeled as sensitive, enforcing access only for designated healthcare staff and blocking unauthorized sharing. By embedding protection directly into the content, organizations maintain security without hindering day-to-day workflows, enabling healthcare professionals to collaborate efficiently while ensuring compliance.

Additionally, MIP provides auditing and reporting capabilities that enable compliance with strict healthcare regulations such as HIPAA, GDPR, and regional privacy laws. Security and compliance teams can track who accessed or attempted to access protected healthcare information, identify anomalies, and generate reports for regulatory audits. These insights help organizations detect potential policy violations, monitor insider activity, and respond proactively to threats.

By providing automated, persistent, and adaptive protection for healthcare data, MIP mitigates security risks while maintaining operational efficiency. It ensures that sensitive information remains confidential, reduces the likelihood of breaches, and supports compliance requirements, all without impeding the productivity of authorized users. In this way, MIP delivers a balanced approach that safeguards healthcare information while enabling secure collaboration and effective patient care.

Question 85:

Your organization wants to run phishing simulations to assess employee security awareness and improve training over time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Attack Simulator
B) Threat Explorer
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Information Protection

Answer: A) – Attack Simulator

Explanation:

Attack Simulator, part of Microsoft Defender for Office 365, allows organizations to run controlled phishing simulations to evaluate employee awareness, identify high-risk users, and deliver targeted security training. It simulates realistic phishing scenarios, such as credential-harvesting emails, malicious attachments, and spoofed messages, without affecting production systems.

Administrators can select specific users or groups, customize messages, and track interactions like clicks on links or credential submissions. Reports identify users most susceptible to phishing, allowing organizations to deliver targeted training to reduce human error.

Repeated simulations allow organizations to measure progress over time, evaluate training effectiveness, and reinforce safe security practices. Integration with training modules ensures immediate feedback for users who fail simulations, promoting a strong security culture.

Other solutions do not simulate phishing attacks. Threat Explorer investigates real threats but cannot perform simulations. MCAS monitors activity but does not assess user awareness. MIP protects content but does not simulate phishing scenarios.

In practice, Attack Simulator ensures continuous improvement in security awareness, reduces human-related risks, and strengthens organizational cybersecurity posture.

Question 86:

Your organization wants to prevent users from accessing Microsoft 365 apps on devices that are not compliant with corporate security policies. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Information Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce adaptive, context-aware access policies. In this scenario, the objective is to block non-compliant devices from accessing Microsoft 365 apps such as Teams, SharePoint, or OneDrive. Compliance is verified using Microsoft Endpoint Manager, which checks for device enrollment, OS version, antivirus status, encryption, and other configuration policies.

Administrators can create Conditional Access policies targeting specific users or groups and specify Microsoft 365 applications. The policy can enforce “require a compliant device” as a control. If a user attempts to sign in from a non-compliant device, access is blocked until the device meets compliance requirements. This ensures corporate data remains protected and reduces risk from unmanaged or insecure devices.

Policies can also include location and risk-based conditions, combining signals such as device compliance, sign-in risk, and user group membership. Detailed audit logs track blocked access attempts and policy enforcement, providing visibility for incident response and regulatory compliance.

Other solutions do not provide this level of access control. Microsoft Information Protection classifies and protects content but does not enforce device compliance. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors activity but cannot prevent sign-ins. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not enforce cloud access policies.

In practice, Conditional Access ensures only trusted, compliant devices access sensitive resources, balancing security and productivity while protecting organizational assets.

Question 87:

Your organization wants to detect risky sign-ins and automatically enforce MFA or block access for compromised accounts. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection provides organizations with automated risk-based enforcement for sign-ins and user accounts. It uses machine learning, behavioral analytics, and threat intelligence to detect suspicious activities such as sign-ins from unfamiliar locations, impossible travel, or leaked credentials.

Administrators can configure sign-in risk policies to enforce MFA or block access when a sign-in is flagged as high-risk. Similarly, user risk policies can trigger password resets for accounts with elevated risk. Integration with Conditional Access enables adaptive enforcement, allowing legitimate users to proceed seamlessly while preventing unauthorized access.

For example, if a user attempts to sign in from a new geographic region, Identity Protection can require MFA or block access entirely until verified. Detailed audit logs track detected risks, policy enforcement, and remediation actions, supporting compliance reporting and incident investigation.

Other solutions do not provide automated risk-based access control. MCAS monitors activity but cannot enforce MFA for risky sign-ins. MIP classifies content but does not manage sign-in risk. Defender for Office 365 protects against threats but does not remediate compromised accounts.

In practice, Identity Protection ensures continuous monitoring and proactive mitigation of compromised accounts, reducing the risk of account takeover while maintaining usability for legitimate users.

Question 88:

Your organization wants to classify emails containing sensitive financial information and prevent them from being sent to external recipients. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) allows organizations to automatically classify and protect sensitive content such as financial data. Using predefined sensitive information types or custom rules, MIP can detect sensitive financial information in emails, attachments, and documents.

Once detected, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict access, and prevent external sharing. For example, if an employee attempts to email a financial report containing credit card numbers to an external recipient, MIP automatically encrypts the email and prevents it from being sent.

Automation ensures consistent enforcement across Microsoft 365 applications, minimizing accidental data leaks and reducing reliance on user action. Audit logs provide detailed reporting of access attempts, policy enforcement, and sharing activity, supporting compliance with standards like PCI DSS and internal security policies.

Other solutions do not offer content-specific enforcement. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies but cannot detect content. MCAS monitors activity but does not automatically prevent sharing based on content. Defender for Office 365 protects endpoints and email from malware and phishing, but does not classify or enforce content-specific restrictions.

In practice, MIP ensures protection of sensitive financial information, reducing exposure risk, maintaining regulatory compliance, and allowing legitimate workflows for authorized users.

Question 89:

Your organization wants to detect anomalous activity, such as mass downloads or unusual sharing of sensitive documents, in Microsoft 365. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Cloud App Security

Explanation:

Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides behavioral analytics and anomaly detection across Microsoft 365 and other cloud applications. It monitors user activity and establishes baseline behavior patterns, detecting deviations such as mass downloads, unusual file sharing, or access from unfamiliar devices.

Administrators can define real-time policies to respond to suspicious activity, including blocking downloads, alerting security teams, or restricting file access. For instance, if a user downloads hundreds of sensitive documents outside normal hours, MCAS can immediately block further downloads and notify administrators for investigation.

Session policies integrated with Conditional Access App Control allow enforcement based on context, such as device type, location, or user risk. Detailed logs support auditing and compliance reporting, enabling organizations to track insider threats or compromised accounts.

Other solutions do not provide session-level anomaly detection. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces sign-in controls but does not monitor activity during sessions. MIP labels and protects content, but does not detect behavioral anomalies. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not monitor cloud activity.

In practice, MCAS ensures proactive detection and mitigation of insider threats, safeguarding sensitive content while maintaining legitimate workflows for trusted users and devices.

Question 90:

Your organization wants to automatically classify healthcare documents containing PHI and prevent them from being shared externally. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to classify and protect sensitive content, including personal health information (PHI). Predefined sensitive information types or custom policies allow administrators to detect healthcare-related data across emails, documents, and Microsoft 365 applications.

Once PHI is detected, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict access to authorized users, and prevent external sharing. For example, if a healthcare worker uploads a patient record to SharePoint and attempts external sharing, MIP automatically enforces internal-only access, mitigating data leakage.

Automation ensures consistent policy enforcement without user intervention, reducing the risk of accidental exposure. Audit logs provide insights into attempted access, sharing activity, and policy enforcement, supporting compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and internal regulations.

Other solutions do not provide automated content classification and protection. Conditional Access controls access but cannot detect PHI. MCAS monitors activity but does not automatically label sensitive data. Defender for Office 365 secures devices but does not enforce content-level policies.

In practice, MIP ensures protection of healthcare data, maintaining internal access for authorized users while preventing accidental or malicious external sharing.

Question 91:

Your organization wants to run phishing simulations to test employee security awareness and reinforce training over time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Attack Simulator
B) Threat Explorer
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Information Protection

Answer: A) – Attack Simulator

Explanation:

Attack Simulator, part of Microsoft Defender for Office 365, allows organizations to run controlled phishing simulations to assess employee security awareness and reinforce training. It simulates realistic phishing attacks, including credential-harvesting emails, malicious attachments, and spoofed messages, without affecting production systems.

Administrators can select target users or groups, customize messages, and track user interactions, such as clicks on links or credential submissions. Reports highlight employees who are most susceptible to phishing, enabling targeted security awareness training to reduce human error and prevent data breaches.

Repeated simulations allow organizations to measure progress over time, evaluate training effectiveness, and reinforce safe security behaviors. Integration with training modules provides immediate feedback to users who fail simulations, improving their understanding of phishing tactics and how to respond safely.

Other solutions do not simulate phishing attacks. Threat Explorer investigates real threats but does not test user behavior. MCAS monitors activity but does not evaluate employee awareness. MIP protects content but does not perform phishing simulations.

In practice, Attack Simulator helps organizations build a strong security culture, reduce human-related risks, and strengthen overall cybersecurity posture.

Question 92:

Your organization wants to block access to Microsoft 365 apps from devices that are non-compliant with corporate security standards. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Information Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce access policies based on device compliance, location, and user risk. In this scenario, the organization wants to block non-compliant devices from accessing Microsoft 365 apps like Teams, SharePoint, or OneDrive.

Using Microsoft Endpoint Manager, administrators can define device compliance criteria, including encryption, antivirus status, OS version, and enrollment in corporate management. Conditional Access policies can then require compliant devices to access applications. Non-compliant devices are blocked until they meet the defined requirements.

Policies can also combine additional conditions, such as sign-in risk or geographic location, creating a context-aware security posture. Audit logs provide visibility into blocked sign-ins and policy enforcement, supporting incident response and compliance reporting.

Other solutions do not enforce device compliance for access. MIP classifies content but cannot control access. MCAS monitors activity but cannot prevent non-compliant device sign-ins. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not enforce cloud app access policies.

In practice, Conditional Access ensures only trusted deviceshave access to sensitive resources, balancing security and productivity while preventing data exposure from unmanaged devices.

Question 93:

Your organization wants to automatically classify emails containing sensitive personal information and prevent them from leaving the organization. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) allows organizations to automatically detect, classify, and protect sensitive content, including personally identifiable information (PII) like social security numbers, financial data, and health information. Administrators can define sensitive information types or custom policies to detect content in emails, attachments, and documents.

When PII is detected, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict external sharing, and generate audit logs. For example, if an employee attempts to email a spreadsheet containing PII to an external party, MIP automatically prevents the email from being sent and encrypts it for internal users only.

Automation ensures consistent enforcement across Microsoft 365 applications, reducing reliance on user intervention and minimizing accidental data leaks. Detailed audit logs provide insight into access, sharing, and policy enforcement, supporting regulatory compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, and internal security policies.

Other solutions do not provide automated content-based enforcement. Conditional Access enforces access policies but cannot detect content. MCAS monitors activity but does not prevent content from leaving the organization. Defender for Office 365 protects endpoints and email from threats, but does not enforce content-specific protection.

In practice, MIP ensuresthe  the protection of sensitive personal information, maintains compliance, and allows legitimate workflows for internal users.

Question 94:

Your organization wants to detect abnormal user behavior in Microsoft 365, such as bulk downloads or unusual sharing activity, and respond immediately. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Cloud App Security

Explanation:

Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides behavioral analytics and anomaly detection to identify unusual activity across Microsoft 365 and other cloud applications. It establishes baseline user behavior and detects deviations, such as bulk downloads, excessive sharing, or sign-ins from unfamiliar devices.

Administrators can define real-time response policies, including blocking downloads, restricting sharing, alerting security teams, or quarantining files. For example, if a user downloads hundreds of sensitive financial documents outside of normal business hours, MCAS can immediately block further downloads and notify security teams for investigation.

Session policies integrated with Conditional Access App Control provide context-aware enforcement, including device type, location, and user risk. Detailed logs support auditing, compliance reporting, and insider threat investigation.

Other solutions do not provide session-level anomaly detection. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces sign-in policies but does not monitor ongoing activity. MIP classifies content but does not detect behavioral anomalies. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not monitor cloud application behavior.

In practice, MCAS enables organizations to proactively detect and mitigate insider threats, protecting sensitive content while allowing legitimate workflows for trusted users and devices.

Question 95:

Your organization wants to classify healthcare documents containing PHI and prevent external sharing while allowing internal access. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to automatically classify and protect sensitive content, including personal health information (PHI). Using predefined sensitive information types or custom policies, MIP identifies PHI across Microsoft 365 apps and applies protection rules.

Once PHI is detected, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict access to authorized internal users, and prevent external sharing. For example, if a nurse uploads a patient record to SharePoint and attempts external sharing, MIP automatically restricts access to internal personnel, preventing data leakage.

Automation ensures consistent policy enforcement, reducing reliance on manual intervention and minimizing accidental exposure. Audit logs provide detailed reporting on access, sharing attempts, and policy enforcement, supporting HIPAA compliance and internal security controls.

Other solutions do not provide automated content classification and protection. Conditional Access controls access but cannot detect PHI. MCAS monitors activity but does not automatically label sensitive data. Defender for Office 365 protects endpoints but does not enforce content-level policies.

In practice, MIP ensures robust protection of healthcare information, mitigating insider and external threats while maintaining internal access for authorized personnel.

Question 96:

Your organization wants to simulate phishing attacks to evaluate employee security awareness and track improvements over time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Attack Simulator
B) Threat Explorer
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Information Protection

Answer: A) – Attack Simulator

Explanation:

Attack Simulator, part of Microsoft Defender for Office 365, enables organizations to run controlled phishing simulations to test employee awareness and reinforce training. It simulates phishing tactics such as credential-harvesting emails, malicious attachments, and spoofed messages without impacting real systems.

Administrators can target specific users or groups, customize phishing emails, and track interactions, such as link clicks or credential submissions. Reports identify high-risk employees and allow organizations to provide targeted security awareness training.

Repeated simulations enable organizations to measure improvements, assess training effectiveness, and reinforce safe behaviors. Integration with training modules provides immediate feedback to users who fail simulations, improving knowledge retention.

Other solutions do not simulate phishing attacks. Threat Explorer investigates threats but cannot run simulations. MCAS monitors activity but does not assess employee awareness. MIP protects content but does not simulate phishing.

In practice, Attack Simulator helps organizations build a strong security culture, reduce human risk, and strengthen overall cybersecurity posture.

Question 97:

Your organization wants to prevent access to Microsoft 365 apps from devices that are non-compliant. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Information Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies based on device compliance, location, and risk signals. Using Microsoft Endpoint Manager, administrators define device compliance criteria such as encryption, antivirus, OS version, and enrollment. Conditional Access policies then require devices to meet compliance to access Microsoft 365 apps.

Non-compliant devices are blocked until they meet requirements, preventing sensitive data from being accessed on untrusted endpoints. Policies can combine multiple conditions for context-aware enforcement, including user group membership and sign-in risk. Detailed audit logs track access attempts and enforcement actions.

Other solutions do not enforce device compliance for cloud access. MIP classifies content but cannot control device access. MCAS monitors activity but does not block non-compliant sign-ins. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not enforce cloud access policies.

In practice, Conditional Access ensures only trusted devices access sensitive resources, balancing security with productivity while protecting organizational data.

Question 98:

Your organization wants to detect risky sign-ins and enforce MFA or block access for compromised accounts. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection provides automated risk detection and mitigation for sign-ins and user accounts. Risk factors include unusual locations, impossible travel, unfamiliar devices, and leaked credentials. Each account or sign-in receives a risk score determining the appropriate remediation.

Administrators can configure sign-in risk policies to enforce MFA or block access and user risk policies to trigger password resets. Integration with Conditional Access ensures adaptive enforcement, balancing security and usability. Detailed audit logs provide visibility into risks, policy enforcement, and remediation actions for compliance and investigation.

Other solutions do not provide automated risk-based enforcement. MCAS monitors activity but cannot enforce MFA for risky sign-ins. MIP classifies content but does not manage account risk. Defender for Office 365 protects endpoints but cannot remediate compromised accounts.

In practice, Identity Protection ensures continuous monitoring and adaptive mitigation, reducing account compromise risk while maintaining legitimate access.

Question 99:

Your organization wants to classify sensitive emails and prevent them from being sent externally while maintaining internal access. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables automated classification and protection of sensitive content such as financial data, PII, or proprietary information. By applying sensitivity labels, MIP enforces encryption, restricts external sharing, and generates audit logs.

For example, an employee attempting to send an email containing sensitive financial data to an external recipient will have the email automatically encrypted and restricted to internal users. This reduces the risk of accidental data leakage and ensures compliance with regulatory standards.

Automation provides consistent enforcement across Microsoft 365 apps, minimizing reliance on user actions. Audit logs track access, sharing, and policy enforcement for compliance reporting and investigations.

Other solutions do not offer content-specific enforcement. Conditional Access controls access but cannot detect content. MCAS monitors activity but does not prevent content from leaving the organization. Defender for Office 365 protects endpoints but does not enforce content-specific policies.

In practice, MIP ensures robust protection of sensitive emails, maintains internal workflows, and supports regulatory compliance.

Question 100:

Your organization wants to detect anomalous activity in Microsoft 365 apps, such as mass downloads or unusual sharing, and respond in real time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Cloud App Security

Explanation:

Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides behavioral analytics and anomaly detection for Microsoft 365 and other cloud applications. It establishes baseline user activity patterns and identifies suspicious behavior such as mass downloads, unusual sharing, or access from unfamiliar devices.

Administrators can define real-time response policies to block downloads, restrict sharing, alert security teams, or quarantine files. For instance, if a user downloads hundreds of sensitive documents outside normal working hours, MCAS can immediately block further downloads and notify security teams for investigation.

Integration with Conditional Access App Control allows session-level enforcement based on context, including device type, location, or user risk. Detailed logs enable auditing, compliance reporting, and investigation of insider threats or compromised accounts.

Other solutions do not provide session-level anomaly detection. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces sign-in controls but cannot monitor ongoing activity. MIP labels content but does not detect behavioral anomalies. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not monitor cloud application behavior.

In practice, MCAS ensures proactive detection and mitigation of insider threats, protecting sensitive content while maintaining legitimate workflows for trusted users and devices.