Microsoft  PL-600  Microsoft Power Platform Solution Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 2  Q 21- 40

Visit here for our full Microsoft PL-600 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 21

Your organization wants to implement automated case routing in a Model-driven app based on case type, priority, and customer region. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate flow triggered on case creation.

B) Canvas app with manual assignment forms.

C) Model-driven app business rules.

D) Power BI dashboards for monitoring case routing.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate allows you to create automated workflows triggered when a new case is created in Dataverse. You can implement conditional logic to route cases based on type, priority, customer region, or any combination of fields. The workflow can assign ownership to the correct user or team automatically, send notifications, and log routing decisions. Power Automate is low-code, scalable, and maintainable, enabling the organization to define routing rules in a centralized manner. This ensures operational efficiency, reduces errors, and provides audit trails for case handling. By leveraging Power Automate, you can also integrate external systems, such as email or Teams, to notify the assigned agents immediately, ensuring a seamless and automated case management process.

B) Canvas apps allow users to manually assign cases using forms or buttons. While you could design a Canvas app to capture the case type and allow the user to assign it to a team, this approach is entirely manual, prone to human error, and does not scale for high-volume case submissions. Users would need to continually interact with the app to assign cases, increasing operational workload and delaying response times. It also does not provide automated auditing or notifications, making it less suitable for enterprise-level case management.

C) Model-driven app business rules can enforce certain conditions and provide field-level validations. While business rules can automatically set field values based on specific conditions, they are not capable of handling multi-step routing logic across multiple teams or integrating with notification channels. Business rules operate within the context of a single record and are best used for enforcing data integrity or simple field calculations rather than complex workflow automation.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize routing outcomes, case assignment patterns, and metrics such as average response time. However, dashboards are analytical tools and do not trigger workflow automation. They cannot automatically assign cases or send notifications. Using dashboards alone would not meet the requirement for automated routing, though they are useful for post-process monitoring and performance analysis.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate flows allow fully automated, rule-based case routing, integrating notifications, ownership assignment, and audit trails. Other options either require manual intervention or do not provide operational automation, making them less effective in real-world enterprise scenarios. This solution reduces human error, improves efficiency, and ensures that cases are consistently assigned according to organizational policies.

Question 22

A company wants to collect survey responses from external customers and automatically categorize feedback into positive, neutral, or negative sentiment in Dataverse. Which approach is most suitable?

A) Power Automate flow with AI Builder text classification model.

B) Canvas app with manual sentiment tagging.

C) Model-driven app with calculated sentiment fields.

D) Power BI sentiment analysis dashboards.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can trigger workflows whenever survey responses are submitted through Microsoft Forms or other data sources. By integrating AI Builder text classification models, each response can be automatically analyzed for sentiment. The AI model categorizes the response as positive, neutral, or negative and writes the result to a Dataverse field associated with the customer record. This approach is fully automated, low-code, and scalable, allowing real-time processing of large volumes of feedback. Additionally, Power Automate can trigger notifications or follow-up actions depending on the sentiment score, such as escalating negative feedback to customer service teams. It also provides maintainability since the AI model can be retrained over time to improve accuracy and adapt to new terminology or trends in customer feedback.

B) Canvas apps could theoretically allow a user to manually review each response and tag sentiment. However, this approach is labor-intensive, prone to human bias, and not practical for large datasets. Manual tagging introduces delays and inconsistencies, making it unsuitable for enterprise-level survey analysis, especially when responses are submitted continuously.

C) Model-driven app calculated fields can perform deterministic operations such as summing values or computing ratios. However, calculated fields cannot perform AI-based sentiment analysis. They do not have the capability to interpret text or perform natural language processing, so they cannot categorize customer responses into sentiment categories automatically.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize sentiment data once it is collected, but they cannot perform real-time sentiment classification on new survey submissions. Power BI is a reporting and analytical tool, not a workflow automation engine. While it is valuable for monitoring trends, it cannot replace the operational automation needed to categorize and respond to feedback in Dataverse.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate with AI Builder text classification provides real-time, automated sentiment analysis, integrates directly with Dataverse, and supports follow-up workflows. Other approaches either require manual intervention or do not support AI-driven categorization.

Question 23

An organization wants to automate employee onboarding by provisioning Microsoft 365 accounts, Teams channels, and SharePoint folders based on HR system records. Which approach should they use?

A) Power Automate with Microsoft 365 and Dataverse connectors.

B) Canvas app with manual onboarding checklist.

C) Model-driven app with HR dashboards.

D) Power BI monitoring of HR metrics.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can be configured to trigger a workflow whenever a new employee record is created in Dataverse or an HR system. The workflow can create Microsoft 365 accounts, assign Teams memberships, generate SharePoint folders, and apply relevant permissions automatically. This approach is fully automated, scalable, and low-code, reducing human errors and accelerating the onboarding process. Power Automate can also integrate with approval workflows, notifying managers when certain steps are completed or require intervention. This ensures compliance with internal policies and provides a comprehensive, auditable onboarding process.

B) Canvas apps with a manual checklist could theoretically guide HR personnel through the onboarding process. However, this approach is completely manual, slow, and error-prone. It cannot automatically provision Microsoft 365 resources, and scaling this solution across multiple new employees is inefficient.

C) Model-driven dashboards can provide visibility into HR processes, tracking which steps have been completed for each employee. However, dashboards cannot perform automated provisioning or trigger workflows. They are primarily analytical tools rather than operational automation tools.

D) Power BI monitoring can visualize HR onboarding metrics and trends but cannot create resources or trigger operational processes. It is useful for reporting but does not automate actions in the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate provides an end-to-end automated onboarding solution, integrating HR data with Microsoft 365, Teams, SharePoint, and Dataverse, reducing manual effort and ensuring compliance.

Question 24

A company wants to monitor customer service KPIs and alert managers if SLA thresholds are breached. Which solution is most effective?

A) Power BI real-time dashboards with Power Automate alerts.

B) Canvas app with manual KPI monitoring.

C) Model-driven app dashboards only.

D) Excel reports sent via email.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power BI supports real-time streaming datasets that can visualize KPIs such as case resolution times, first response times, and SLA compliance. By integrating with Power Automate, specific thresholds (e.g., a case exceeding SLA) can trigger automated notifications to managers via Teams, email, or other channels. This approach is automated, low-code, and scalable, providing actionable insights in real-time and ensuring that SLA breaches are addressed promptly. The integration enables a feedback loop, where data visualization and automated alerts work together to support proactive service management.

B) Canvas apps could be designed to display KPIs, but manual monitoring requires users to continuously check the application. It is labor-intensive, prone to delays, and does not provide automated alerting. This approach is inefficient for large-scale operations with multiple metrics and frequent updates.

C) Model-driven dashboards allow visualization of KPIs, but they do not provide automated alerting when thresholds are breached. Managers would need to manually review dashboards to detect issues, which can delay response times and reduce effectiveness in meeting SLAs.

D) Excel reports distributed via email are static and typically updated on a periodic schedule (daily, weekly). They cannot support real-time monitoring or trigger alerts automatically. This approach is slow and lacks the immediacy required for SLA management.

The correct answer is A because Power BI dashboards combined with Power Automate alerts provide real-time monitoring and proactive notifications, enabling managers to address SLA breaches promptly. Other approaches either require manual intervention or are too static to support timely operational decisions.

Question 25

Your organization wants to enable field agents to capture inspections via mobile devices, automatically upload images, and log location data into Dataverse. Which approach should you use?

A) Canvas app with camera control and GPS integration.

B) Model-driven app with file attachments.

C) Power BI dashboards to record data.

D) Excel forms uploaded to SharePoint.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Canvas apps support device-native camera controls and GPS functionality. Field agents can capture images and location data directly within the app. These inputs can be stored in Dataverse, allowing downstream workflows such as approvals, reporting, or analytics. Canvas apps provide real-time integration, low-code development, offline capabilities, and mobile device support, making them ideal for field inspections. Additionally, forms can include validation logic to ensure data quality before submission, improving operational efficiency and reducing errors.

B) Model-driven apps can store file attachments but do not have native support for device cameras or GPS integration. While attachments can be uploaded after capturing photos externally, this approach is less efficient, slower, and does not support real-time mobile capture, reducing usability for field agents.

C) Power BI dashboards are for analytics and visualization, not data capture. They cannot record images or GPS locations and do not provide a workflow for operational inspection processes. Power BI is only suitable for reporting post-data collection.

D) Excel forms uploaded to SharePoint can capture data manually, but they are not optimized for mobile devices or real-time image and location capture. This approach requires manual uploading and lacks automation, increasing workload and the risk of errors.

The correct answer is A because Canvas apps provide mobile-first, low-code capabilities for field inspections, supporting real-time capture of images and GPS data into Dataverse while integrating with workflows and automation for operational efficiency.

Question 26

A company wants to automate contract approval workflows where contracts are reviewed by multiple departments, signed electronically, and stored in Dataverse. Which approach is most suitable?

A) Power Automate approval flows with e-signature integration.

B) Canvas app with manual approval buttons.

C) Model-driven app dashboards to monitor approvals.

D) Power BI dashboards to track contract status.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate provides a comprehensive workflow automation platform capable of orchestrating multi-step approval processes. Using Dataverse as the underlying data source, workflows can be triggered whenever a new contract record is created. Conditional logic can direct contracts to the appropriate departments for review based on criteria such as contract type, value, or region. Integration with e-signature solutions like Adobe Sign or DocuSign allows documents to be signed electronically without leaving the workflow. Notifications and reminders can be sent automatically to reviewers or approvers via Teams or email, ensuring that approvals are completed on time. This approach is low-code, scalable, auditable, and fully integrated with the Microsoft ecosystem. It enables tracking of each approval step, supports escalations, and maintains compliance with internal and external governance policies. By using Power Automate, the company can significantly reduce the time and errors associated with manual contract routing and approvals.

B) Canvas apps can include manual approval buttons, allowing users to mark contracts as approved or rejected. While feasible for very small-scale workflows, this method requires human intervention at each step and does not automate notifications, reminders, or electronic signature collection. Manual workflows are prone to errors and delays, particularly when multiple departments are involved. Additionally, there is no centralized way to track approval progress automatically, reducing visibility and auditability. Canvas apps are better suited for data entry and simple processes rather than enterprise-level contract workflow automation.

C) Model-driven dashboards can visualize approval status, showing which contracts are pending, approved, or rejected. While dashboards provide valuable insights and operational oversight, they cannot initiate automated workflows or handle multi-step approval processes. They are reporting tools and cannot perform operational functions such as notifications, escalations, or e-signature collection. Therefore, using dashboards alone does not meet the requirement for automated contract approvals.

D) Power BI dashboards can track metrics related to contract approvals, such as the number of pending approvals, average approval time, and bottlenecks. However, Power BI is purely analytical and does not provide operational automation. It cannot route contracts for review, trigger notifications, or integrate with e-signature services. Using Power BI alone would only allow managers to monitor the process after the fact, which is reactive rather than proactive.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate approval flows provide a fully automated, low-code solution for multi-department contract approvals, integrating notifications, escalations, and e-signature collection. This approach ensures efficiency, auditability, and compliance, while the other options either require manual intervention or provide only monitoring capabilities.

Question 27

A company wants to implement a customer feedback system that classifies feedback by product category, automatically escalates negative feedback, and generates reports. Which approach is best?

A) Power Automate with AI Builder classification model and Dataverse storage.

B) Canvas app for manual classification.

C) Model-driven app with calculated fields for feedback categorization.

D) Power BI dashboards for visualizing feedback trends.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can be triggered whenever new feedback is submitted, for example through Microsoft Forms or Dataverse forms. By integrating AI Builder classification models, the system can automatically categorize feedback by product or service type. Sentiment analysis can detect negative feedback, and the workflow can escalate it to the appropriate team or manager automatically. Dataverse is used to store structured feedback, enabling downstream reporting, historical analysis, and integration with CRM processes. This approach is fully automated, low-code, and scalable, allowing the organization to process large volumes of feedback in near real-time. Notifications and automated actions ensure that critical feedback is addressed promptly, improving customer satisfaction and operational responsiveness. Additionally, AI models can be retrained over time, improving accuracy and adapting to new trends in customer feedback. This solution provides end-to-end operational capability from collection and categorization to escalation and reporting.

B) Canvas apps can allow a user to manually classify feedback and send notifications for negative responses. While this method can work for small-scale feedback, it is not scalable, is prone to human error, and lacks automation for timely escalation. Manual classification also delays analysis and reporting, which can affect the organization’s ability to respond promptly to negative feedback.

C) Model-driven app calculated fields can create deterministic categorizations, such as labeling feedback based on keywords. However, calculated fields cannot perform AI-based classification or sentiment analysis, limiting their effectiveness for nuanced or unstructured feedback. They cannot trigger escalation workflows automatically based on sentiment, meaning negative feedback might be overlooked or delayed.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize trends in customer feedback, showing metrics like sentiment distributions or category counts. However, Power BI is analytic only and cannot classify incoming feedback or automate escalation workflows. While dashboards are valuable for monitoring and reporting, they do not address operational needs for immediate response or workflow automation.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate combined with AI Builder provides automated feedback classification, escalation, and integration with Dataverse, delivering an end-to-end solution that meets operational, analytical, and workflow requirements. Other approaches either require manual intervention or lack operational automation.

Question 28

Your organization needs to track inventory levels in real-time, alert staff when stock is low, and trigger automated reordering. Which solution is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate with Dataverse inventory tables and alert logic.

B) Canvas app displaying current stock levels for manual monitoring.

C) Model-driven app with dashboards only.

D) Power BI reports updated daily.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can monitor Dataverse inventory tables and trigger alerts when stock drops below defined thresholds. Automated workflows can send notifications to staff via Teams, email, or SMS, and initiate reordering processes, such as creating purchase orders in integrated ERP systems. This approach is real-time, automated, and low-code, enabling proactive inventory management. By using Dataverse as the central data store, inventory data is consistently updated and accessible across applications. Power Automate workflows can also include conditional logic to route approvals for reorders, track reorder status, and log activities for audit purposes. The combination of Dataverse and Power Automate ensures end-to-end operational automation, reducing manual effort and minimizing stockouts, while providing a scalable solution for growing inventory needs.

B) Canvas apps can display current stock levels to users, allowing them to manually monitor inventory. While this provides a visual interface, it is not automated. Staff must continuously check the app, which introduces delays and increases the risk of stockouts. Manual monitoring is less efficient for high-volume or time-sensitive operations.

C) Model-driven dashboards can visualize inventory levels and trends. However, dashboards are passive and do not trigger alerts or initiate reordering workflows. While they are helpful for oversight, they cannot provide the operational automation required for real-time inventory management.

D) Power BI reports updated daily provide historical insight into inventory levels but are not real-time. Alerts cannot be triggered automatically based on current stock conditions, and reordering workflows cannot be automated through Power BI alone. This approach may lead to delays in responding to low-stock situations.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate integrated with Dataverse enables automated, real-time monitoring and reordering, ensuring inventory levels are maintained efficiently. Other approaches lack automation, scalability, or real-time capabilities.

Question 29

A company wants to automate approval of travel requests that exceed certain budget thresholds, including notifications to managers and integration with Teams. Which approach is best?

A) Power Automate approval flows with conditional logic.

B) Canvas app with manual submission and approvals.

C) Model-driven app workflows with simple status updates.

D) Power BI dashboards for tracking travel requests.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate allows the creation of multi-step approval workflows triggered when a travel request record is created in Dataverse. Conditional logic can route requests based on budget thresholds, departmental policies, or employee role. Notifications can be sent to managers in Teams or email, and escalations can be automated if approvals are delayed. Power Automate can also log decisions for auditing purposes. This approach is low-code, scalable, and fully integrated with Dataverse, Teams, and Microsoft 365, providing operational efficiency, consistency, and real-time workflow management. It enables the organization to maintain governance and compliance while minimizing manual intervention and errors.

B) Canvas apps can allow employees to submit travel requests and managers to manually approve them. However, approvals and notifications are not automated, making the process slow and prone to delays, particularly for high volumes of requests. Manual interventions reduce scalability and auditability.

C) Model-driven app workflows can automate simple status updates when records are changed, but they do not support complex multi-step approvals, conditional routing, or Teams integration. This makes them inadequate for workflows requiring multiple decision points or budget-based routing.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize travel request trends, approval rates, and delays. While valuable for reporting, dashboards cannot automate approval workflows, notifications, or conditional routing. They provide insights only after the fact, which is insufficient for operational automation.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate provides automated, conditional approval workflows, integrates with Teams for notifications, and ensures governance and real-time operational management. Other approaches are either manual, limited, or purely analytical.

Question 30

An organization wants to capture IoT device alerts, store them in Dataverse, and trigger automated incident workflows for IT staff. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate flows triggered by Azure IoT Hub events.

B) Canvas app for manual logging of alerts.

C) Model-driven dashboards to monitor alerts.

D) Power BI dashboards for incident reporting.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can be configured to trigger flows when IoT Hub events are received. Alerts can be automatically processed, stored in Dataverse with relevant metadata (device ID, timestamp, alert type), and used to initiate incident management workflows. Notifications can be sent to IT staff via Teams, email, or SMS, and conditional logic can assign incidents to specific teams or escalate based on severity. This approach is real-time, low-code, and scalable, allowing organizations to respond to IoT incidents quickly and efficiently. Integration with Dataverse ensures structured storage of alert data for reporting, analytics, and compliance tracking. Workflows can also trigger automated remediation actions or record audit logs, ensuring operational governance.

B) Canvas apps could allow IT staff to manually log IoT alerts. While useful in very limited scenarios, this approach is not scalable, not real-time, and relies entirely on human intervention. It cannot handle high volumes of device alerts or trigger automated incident responses.

C) Model-driven dashboards can display IoT alerts and trends, but they cannot automate incident workflows. They are useful for monitoring but do not support operational automation or proactive alert handling.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize IoT alerts for historical reporting or trend analysis. However, Power BI cannot trigger real-time workflows or notifications, making it insufficient for operational incident management.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate flows integrate IoT alerts with Dataverse and automate incident workflows, enabling real-time, scalable, and proactive operational management. Other approaches either rely on manual intervention or are purely analytical.

Question 31

A company wants to automate employee leave requests, including multi-level approvals, notifications, and updates to the HR system stored in Dataverse. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate approval flows with conditional logic and Dataverse integration.

B) Canvas app with manual submission and notifications.

C) Model-driven app dashboards to track leave requests.

D) Power BI dashboards for leave trends analysis.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate provides the ability to design multi-step approval flows that trigger when a leave request is submitted in Dataverse. Conditional logic can route requests to different managers depending on employee department, leave type, or duration. Notifications can be automatically sent via Teams or email to both employees and managers. Integration with HR records in Dataverse allows updates to employee leave balances automatically after approval. This solution is low-code, scalable, and fully automated, reducing manual errors and delays. Additionally, Power Automate supports audit trails, ensuring compliance and transparency in approval processes. Escalation paths can be configured to handle delayed approvals, and the system can also trigger reminders or follow-up notifications to maintain efficiency.

B) Canvas apps can allow employees to submit leave requests and notify managers manually. However, this method is entirely dependent on human action, lacks automation for approvals, notifications, and updates to HR records, and is not scalable. Manual submission and notification increase operational workload and delay responses, which can lead to inefficiencies and employee dissatisfaction.

C) Model-driven dashboards can visualize leave requests and approvals, showing pending, approved, or rejected requests. While this provides oversight, dashboards cannot automate approval workflows, notifications, or record updates. They are suitable for reporting and monitoring but do not facilitate operational processes or reduce manual intervention.

D) Power BI dashboards can provide analytics on leave trends, such as departmental leave usage or peak leave periods. However, Power BI is purely analytical and cannot trigger workflows or approvals. It provides visibility into trends but does not automate operational HR tasks.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate enables fully automated, conditional leave approvals with integration into Dataverse, providing operational efficiency, scalability, and compliance. Other options are either manual or analytical, failing to meet the automation and operational requirements.

Question 32

A company wants to capture field service reports, including images, GPS location, and status updates, using mobile devices, and store this data in Dataverse for automated workflows. Which approach is best?

A) Canvas app with device camera and GPS integration, writing to Dataverse.

B) Model-driven app with file attachments and manual location entry.

C) Power BI dashboards to track field reports.

D) Excel sheets uploaded to SharePoint.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Canvas apps provide native support for device cameras and GPS. Field agents can capture images, automatically capture location data, and update status fields directly from the mobile device. Data is stored in Dataverse in structured format, enabling downstream automation such as notifications, incident creation, or SLA tracking. Canvas apps are low-code, mobile-friendly, and support offline scenarios, allowing field agents to capture data even in remote areas and sync when connectivity is restored. Validation rules and data quality checks can be implemented to prevent errors during submission. The integration with Dataverse allows workflows, Power Automate flows, and AI models to process the data for alerts, approvals, or analytical reporting.

B) Model-driven apps can store attachments and allow manual entry of location data. However, they lack native mobile camera and GPS integration, making field data capture slower and more error-prone. Agents would need to capture images and coordinates externally and manually upload them, which reduces efficiency and real-time operational capability.

C) Power BI dashboards can visualize captured field service data after it is collected. They provide analytics on trends, SLA compliance, or agent performance but cannot capture data directly from mobile devices, process alerts, or trigger workflows. Power BI is analytical, not operational.

D) Excel sheets uploaded to SharePoint can be used for manual data entry, but they are not optimized for mobile devices, do not capture GPS or images natively, and require manual uploading. This method is labor-intensive, error-prone, and unsuitable for scalable, real-time field reporting.

The correct answer is A because Canvas apps enable mobile-first data capture, real-time integration with Dataverse, and support for automated workflows, making them ideal for field service reporting. Other options either require manual intervention or are purely analytical.

Question 33

A company wants to automate expense approvals based on amount thresholds, departmental rules, and employee roles, and send notifications via Teams. Which approach is most suitable?

A) Power Automate approval flows with conditional logic.

B) Canvas app with manual approval submission.

C) Model-driven dashboards showing expense statuses.

D) Power BI dashboards for expense analytics.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can create multi-step approval workflows for expense requests stored in Dataverse. Conditional logic can route expenses based on threshold amounts, department, or employee roles. Notifications and reminders can be automatically sent via Teams or email to ensure timely approvals. Escalation paths can be configured if managers do not act within a set timeframe. Integration with accounting or ERP systems allows approved expenses to trigger reimbursement processes automatically. This solution is fully automated, low-code, and scalable, ensuring compliance, reducing manual errors, and streamlining the approval process.

B) Canvas apps allow manual submission of expenses and notifications. While functional, this method is not automated, requiring managers and employees to perform repetitive tasks manually. It lacks conditional routing based on thresholds or roles and does not scale efficiently in organizations with frequent expense requests.

C) Model-driven dashboards can visualize expense statuses, showing pending, approved, or rejected expenses. While valuable for monitoring, dashboards cannot automate approval workflows, send notifications, or integrate with ERP systems. They are purely monitoring tools.

D) Power BI dashboards provide analytical insights into expenses, trends, and compliance but cannot perform operational workflows such as approvals, routing, or notifications. They are suitable for reporting but not for managing real-time operational tasks.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate provides automated, conditional expense approvals, integrates notifications via Teams, and supports downstream processing for reimbursement. Other options are manual or analytical, failing to meet the requirement for operational automation.

Question 34

An organization wants to analyze customer support chat transcripts, identify key topics, and detect negative sentiment automatically. Which approach is best?

A) Power Automate with AI Builder text analytics and Dataverse integration.

B) Canvas app for manual tagging of topics and sentiment.

C) Model-driven calculated fields for topic classification.

D) Power BI dashboards for sentiment visualization.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can be triggered when new chat transcripts are stored in Dataverse. AI Builder text analytics models can automatically identify topics and classify sentiment as positive, neutral, or negative. Negative or critical feedback can trigger alerts to customer support teams for timely follow-up. This approach is low-code, automated, and scalable, allowing large volumes of chat transcripts to be analyzed in real time. Integration with Dataverse enables structured storage of topics, sentiment scores, and customer identifiers for reporting, historical analysis, or workflow automation. The system can also generate dashboards for performance tracking, and AI models can be retrained to improve accuracy over time.

B) Canvas apps can allow manual tagging of chat transcripts for topic and sentiment. However, this method is time-consuming, prone to human error, and not suitable for processing large volumes of chats in real time. Manual analysis delays response times and reduces operational efficiency.

C) Model-driven calculated fields can perform deterministic operations but cannot perform AI-based topic or sentiment analysis. They are limited to field calculations, aggregations, or logical formulas and do not have natural language processing capabilities.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize sentiment or topic trends after data is analyzed. While useful for monitoring, they cannot perform operational AI-driven analysis on raw transcripts. Dashboards are analytical, not operational.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate with AI Builder enables automated topic identification and sentiment analysis, integrated with Dataverse for storage and workflow actions. Other options either rely on manual processing or are purely analytical.

Question 35

A company wants to automate customer onboarding, including account creation, role assignments, welcome emails, and Teams group membership, based on HR records. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate flows integrating Dataverse and Microsoft 365.

B) Canvas app with manual onboarding steps.

C) Model-driven dashboards for HR onboarding status.

D) Power BI dashboards for onboarding metrics.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can trigger workflows based on new employee records in Dataverse or HR systems. The workflow can create Microsoft 365 accounts, assign appropriate roles, add users to Teams groups, send welcome emails, and perform additional onboarding tasks automatically. This approach is low-code, scalable, auditable, and integrated, ensuring consistency and efficiency in the onboarding process. Escalation and approval paths can be built in for special cases, while notifications keep managers and new employees informed. Automation reduces manual effort, prevents errors, and ensures compliance with company policies. Integration with Dataverse ensures a single source of truth for employee data and provides audit logs for HR compliance purposes.

B) Canvas apps can guide HR staff through onboarding checklists. However, this method is manual, time-consuming, and prone to errors. While it can help track tasks, it does not automate account creation, Teams assignments, or email notifications, making it less suitable for enterprise-scale onboarding.

C) Model-driven dashboards provide visibility into onboarding status for managers. They allow monitoring of completed and pending tasks but cannot automate the creation of accounts, Teams groups, or email notifications. Dashboards are monitoring tools, not operational automation solutions.

D) Power BI dashboards provide analytical insight into onboarding metrics, such as completion rates and task durations. While useful for reporting trends and identifying bottlenecks, they cannot perform operational tasks such as account creation or workflow automation.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate enables fully automated, end-to-end onboarding workflows, integrating Dataverse, Microsoft 365, Teams, and email, while ensuring efficiency, compliance, and scalability. Other options are manual or analytical and do not meet automation requirements.

Question 36

A company wants to automate sales lead assignment based on geography, deal size, and product type, ensuring notifications to sales reps in Teams. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate flow triggered on new lead creation in Dataverse.

B) Canvas app with manual lead assignment forms.

C) Model-driven dashboards showing lead status.

D) Power BI dashboards for lead performance tracking.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate allows creation of rule-based workflows triggered when a new lead is added in Dataverse. Conditional logic can evaluate geography, deal size, product type, and other factors to automatically assign the lead to the most appropriate sales representative or team. Notifications can be sent via Teams, email, or other channels, ensuring that leads are acted upon promptly. Integration with Dataverse ensures that assignment data, notifications, and audit trails are all stored centrally, providing visibility for management and enabling further workflow automation. This approach is low-code, scalable, and fully automated, reducing manual errors and ensuring consistency in lead assignment. Escalation paths can also be configured if leads are not acted upon in a timely manner, ensuring SLA compliance and operational efficiency.

B) Canvas apps could allow sales managers to manually assign leads based on input criteria. While functional in small-scale scenarios, this approach is manual, time-consuming, and prone to human error. It does not scale well in environments with high lead volume or multiple assignment criteria and lacks automation for notifications or escalations.

C) Model-driven dashboards can visualize lead assignments and status, providing insights into which leads have been assigned and their progress. While dashboards help in monitoring, they cannot automate lead assignment, trigger notifications, or implement business rules, limiting their operational usefulness. They are best suited for analytical monitoring rather than operational automation.

D) Power BI dashboards provide analytical insights into lead performance metrics, such as conversion rates or lead distribution. However, Power BI is purely analytical and does not support operational workflows, automated assignment, or notifications. It provides post-facto insights but does not address the operational requirement for real-time lead assignment and action.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate enables fully automated lead assignment workflows, integrates with Teams for real-time notifications, and stores data in Dataverse for auditability and further automation. Other options are either manual or purely analytical, failing to meet the operational automation requirements of enterprise sales processes.

Question 37

A company wants to monitor customer support response times, trigger alerts when response time exceeds SLA, and create follow-up tasks automatically. Which approach is most suitable?

A) Power Automate flows triggered by case updates in Dataverse.

B) Canvas app displaying response times for manual review.

C) Model-driven dashboards showing SLA performance.

D) Power BI dashboards for historical SLA analysis.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate allows the creation of automated workflows triggered by updates to Dataverse records, such as case response times. Conditional logic can compare the elapsed time since case creation or last response against SLA thresholds. If a case exceeds the SLA, the workflow can trigger alerts via Teams, email, or SMS, and create follow-up tasks automatically for managers or support agents. This approach is real-time, scalable, low-code, and fully integrated with Dataverse. It ensures that SLA breaches are proactively addressed, reduces manual oversight, and improves customer satisfaction. Audit logs and notifications provide transparency and compliance tracking, enabling management to monitor responsiveness and identify patterns requiring process improvements.

B) Canvas apps can display response times and allow users to manually identify SLA breaches. While helpful for monitoring, this approach requires manual intervention for every case and does not automatically trigger alerts or follow-up tasks. It is not scalable for large support teams and high-volume cases, leading to delays and potential SLA violations.

C) Model-driven dashboards can visualize SLA compliance and response times. However, dashboards cannot automate alerts or task creation, making them passive tools rather than operational solutions. They are best suited for monitoring trends or historical performance rather than enabling real-time operational management.

D) Power BI dashboards can provide historical analysis of SLA adherence and response times, helping management identify long-term trends and bottlenecks. However, Power BI cannot trigger real-time alerts or automate follow-up actions, which are crucial for operational SLA compliance.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate enables real-time SLA monitoring, automated alerting, and task creation, ensuring proactive management of customer support cases. Other options either rely on manual intervention or provide only analytical insights without operational automation.

Question 38

A company wants to analyze incoming customer emails, classify them into categories, detect urgency, and automatically create cases in Dataverse. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate with AI Builder text classification and Dataverse integration.

B) Canvas app for manual categorization and case creation.

C) Model-driven app with calculated fields for email classification.

D) Power BI dashboards for email trend analysis.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can be configured to trigger workflows when emails arrive in a shared mailbox. Integration with AI Builder text classification models enables automatic categorization of emails by topic or urgency. High-priority emails can trigger automated case creation in Dataverse, assign ownership to the appropriate team, and send notifications to responsible agents. This solution is low-code, scalable, and automated, handling high volumes of emails efficiently. It reduces human intervention, accelerates response times, ensures SLA compliance, and provides audit trails for operational transparency. AI models can be retrained to improve accuracy over time, adapting to new email content patterns and business requirements.

B) Canvas apps can allow users to manually classify emails and create cases. While feasible for small-scale scenarios, this approach is entirely manual, time-consuming, and prone to human error. It does not scale for organizations with high email volumes and delays the processing of urgent cases.

C) Model-driven calculated fields can perform simple deterministic operations but cannot perform AI-driven text classification or urgency detection. Calculated fields are limited to formulas and cannot interpret unstructured email content for automatic categorization or case creation.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize email trends, category distributions, or response times, but they cannot automate classification, detect urgency, or create cases. While analytical insights are valuable, dashboards alone do not meet operational requirements for real-time case handling.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate combined with AI Builder provides automated email processing, classification, and case creation, integrating seamlessly with Dataverse for workflow automation. Other options rely on manual processing or provide only post-event analytical insights.

Question 39

A company wants to automate the process of tracking service contracts, including renewal reminders, customer notifications, and updating contract statuses in Dataverse. Which approach is best?

A) Power Automate flows triggered by contract expiration dates.

B) Canvas app with manual status updates and notifications.

C) Model-driven dashboards showing contract status.

D) Power BI dashboards for contract analytics.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can be configured to trigger workflows based on contract expiration dates or milestones stored in Dataverse. Automated reminders can be sent to customers and account managers, and renewal tasks or approvals can be created. Workflow logic can update contract status fields automatically, ensuring accurate tracking and reducing administrative overhead. This approach is low-code, scalable, and fully automated, improving compliance and customer experience. Notifications can be sent through Teams or email, and escalations can be configured for missed renewals. Integration with other systems, such as CRM or billing platforms, ensures that all contract-related actions are synchronized and auditable, reducing risk of missed renewals or expired contracts going unnoticed.

B) Canvas apps could allow manual tracking of contract statuses and sending reminders. While functional for small volumes, this approach is manual, labor-intensive, and prone to errors. Users must remember to send notifications, update statuses, and track renewals themselves, which reduces efficiency and increases operational risk.

C) Model-driven dashboards can provide a visual overview of contract status and upcoming renewals. While valuable for monitoring, dashboards cannot automate reminders, update statuses, or trigger workflows, limiting their operational usefulness.

D) Power BI dashboards can provide analytics on contracts, renewal rates, or trends. However, Power BI does not automate notifications, workflow triggers, or status updates, making it unsuitable for operational contract management despite its analytical insights.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate enables real-time, automated tracking, notifications, and contract status updates, ensuring operational efficiency and compliance. Other options either require manual intervention or are purely analytical.

Question 40

A company wants to automate incident management for IT tickets, including categorization, prioritization, routing, and notifications to responsible teams. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Power Automate flows triggered by new IT tickets in Dataverse.

B) Canvas app for manual ticket categorization and routing.

C) Model-driven dashboards showing ticket status.

D) Power BI dashboards for incident trend analysis.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Power Automate can automatically process new IT tickets stored in Dataverse, classify them by category, determine priority based on predefined rules, and assign them to the appropriate IT teams. Notifications can be sent through Teams, email, or other communication channels. Escalation workflows can be configured for high-priority incidents, ensuring timely resolution. This approach is low-code, scalable, and fully automated, reducing manual intervention and ensuring consistent operational handling of incidents. Audit logs and ticket history are maintained in Dataverse, supporting compliance, reporting, and SLA management. Integration with other ITSM systems can further enhance automation, enabling full end-to-end incident management.

B) Canvas apps could allow IT staff to manually categorize and route tickets. While possible for small-scale operations, this method is manual, time-consuming, and error-prone. It lacks automation for notifications, prioritization, or escalations, making it inefficient for high-volume IT environments.

C) Model-driven dashboards provide visibility into ticket statuses, showing open, in-progress, or closed incidents. While dashboards help monitor operations, they do not automate categorization, routing, or notifications, limiting operational effectiveness.

D) Power BI dashboards can visualize incident trends, SLA compliance, and ticket volumes. However, Power BI cannot trigger operational workflows, assign tickets, or notify teams. It is analytical only and does not meet operational requirements for incident management.

The correct answer is A because Power Automate enables fully automated incident management, including categorization, prioritization, routing, and notifications, integrated with Dataverse. Other options are manual or purely analytical, failing to meet the automation and operational requirements of enterprise IT management.