Microsoft  AZ-800 Administering Windows Server Hybrid Core Infrastructure Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 2 Q 21- 40

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-800 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 21:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. Your organization wants to implement Azure Site Recovery (ASR) to protect critical on-premises virtual machines. You need to ensure minimal downtime and automatic failover in case of an on-premises disaster. Which solution should you implement?

A) Use DFS Replication between on-premises servers and Azure.

B) Enable Azure Backup for VMs only.

C) Configure Azure Site Recovery replication for on-premises VMs.

D) Use manual snapshot replication to Azure.

Answer: C) Configure Azure Site Recovery replication for on-premises VMs.

Explanation:

A) DFS Replication is a replication technology designed for on-premises file shares. While it can replicate files between servers, it does not support virtual machine replication to Azure, nor does it provide automatic failover or disaster recovery orchestration. Using DFS Replication would not ensure continuity of services for critical VMs in a disaster scenario. It is designed for data redundancy and not for business continuity of full system states.

B) Azure Backup provides data protection by creating snapshots or recovery points of VMs or servers. While it ensures the ability to restore VMs after a failure, it does not provide automatic failover, orchestration, or minimal downtime. In the event of a disaster, restoring from a backup could take hours or longer, depending on the size of the VMs, which does not meet the requirement for minimal downtime or automated disaster recovery.

C) Configuring Azure Site Recovery replication for on-premises VMs is the correct solution. ASR continuously replicates on-premises VMs to Azure and allows administrators to orchestrate failover and failback with minimal downtime. It monitors the health of replication, ensures recovery points are consistent, and integrates with Azure automation to handle failover automatically or manually. This solution supports hybrid disaster recovery, allows testing failover scenarios without impacting production, and provides a scalable, centralized disaster recovery plan. By using ASR, critical workloads can be failed over to Azure during a disaster, keeping services available for users while on-premises infrastructure is restored.

D) Using manual snapshot replication to Azure is impractical and does not meet the requirement for minimal downtime. Manually creating and transferring snapshots of VMs to Azure introduces delays, human error, and operational complexity. It lacks orchestration for failover and does not guarantee consistent replication or business continuity in a disaster scenario.

Azure Site Recovery is purpose-built for hybrid disaster recovery, offering continuous replication, automated orchestration, and minimal downtime, making it the ideal solution for protecting critical on-premises VMs in a hybrid environment.

Question 22:

You are configuring Windows Server 2022 in a hybrid environment. You want to enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrative users accessing both on-premises and Azure resources. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable RDP for all administrators and require smart cards.

B) Configure Conditional Access policies in Azure AD with MFA.

C) Use local accounts with complex passwords on all servers.

D) Enable Windows Defender Firewall to block unauthorized connections.

Answer: B) Configure Conditional Access policies in Azure AD with MFA.

Explanation:

A) Enabling RDP and requiring smart cards adds an additional authentication factor for remote access. While this strengthens security for RDP sessions, it only covers remote desktop connections and does not enforce MFA for other administrative access methods, such as Windows Admin Center, Azure portal, or cloud services. It is not scalable for hybrid environments and fails to provide centralized, policy-driven enforcement.

B) Configuring Conditional Access policies in Azure AD with MFA is the correct solution. Conditional Access evaluates the user’s identity, device compliance, location, and risk factors before granting access to both on-premises and Azure resources. MFA can be enforced as part of these policies, ensuring administrators verify their identity with a second factor before accessing sensitive systems. By integrating with Azure AD, MFA can be applied consistently across hybrid environments, including administrative portals, cloud-hosted VMs, and hybrid services. This approach provides scalable, policy-driven enforcement of MFA, improves security posture, and integrates with device compliance and Conditional Access reporting for auditing.

C) Using local accounts with complex passwords does not enforce MFA. Strong passwords alone cannot protect against phishing attacks, stolen credentials, or compromised devices. Local accounts do not provide centralized authentication or auditing, and administrators would still be able to access systems without additional verification, failing to meet modern security requirements.

D) Enabling Windows Defender Firewall can control network traffic but does not provide authentication or MFA enforcement. Firewalls protect endpoints from unauthorized connections but do not verify user identity, enforce policies, or integrate with hybrid identity solutions. Therefore, firewall configuration alone is insufficient for enforcing MFA.

Conditional Access policies combined with MFA provide centralized, policy-driven, and scalable enforcement for administrative access across both on-premises and Azure resources, ensuring security best practices are met.

Question 23:

You are planning to implement Windows Admin Center in a hybrid environment. You need to configure RBAC to allow specific groups of administrators to manage only certain servers. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure local accounts on each server individually.

B) Use Windows Admin Center RBAC extension.

C) Enable RDP and restrict access using firewall rules.

D) Deploy Group Policy to control administrative access.

Answer: B) Use Windows Admin Center RBAC extension.

Explanation:

A) Configuring local accounts on each server individually is not scalable for hybrid environments. Managing multiple servers with local accounts creates administrative overhead, risks inconsistent permissions, and does not provide centralized management or auditing. Local accounts also cannot enforce policies or roles across multiple servers efficiently.

B) Using the Windows Admin Center RBAC extension is the correct solution. This extension allows administrators to define roles and assign permissions for managing specific servers. It integrates with Active Directory or Azure AD groups, allowing centralized management, auditing, and enforcement. RBAC ensures that administrators can perform only the tasks for which they are authorized, reducing the risk of accidental or malicious configuration changes. This approach is scalable for hybrid environments and aligns with enterprise security standards.

C) Enabling RDP and restricting access with firewall rules provides only coarse access control. While it can prevent unauthorized connections at the network level, it cannot restrict specific administrative actions on servers. RDP plus firewall rules does not offer granular RBAC capabilities or auditing for compliance requirements.

D) Deploying Group Policy can control administrative rights on on-premises AD-joined servers, but it is ineffective for hybrid or Azure AD-joined servers. Group Policy cannot directly enforce RBAC for Windows Admin Center or cloud-hosted servers, making it unsuitable for the requirement.

The Windows Admin Center RBAC extension provides centralized, scalable, and granular access control for hybrid server administration, ensuring administrators only manage servers they are authorized to, while supporting enterprise security best practices.

Question 24:

You are configuring Azure File Sync for a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You want to optimize network bandwidth usage while ensuring files are available on-demand for users. Which configuration should you use?

A) Disable Cloud Tiering.

B) Enable Cloud Tiering.

C) Use DFS Replication between servers and Azure.

D) Enable Azure Backup only.

Answer: B) Enable Cloud Tiering.

Explanation:

A) Disabling Cloud Tiering keeps all files fully present on the local server. While this ensures offline availability, it consumes more local storage and increases network usage during replication because all files are stored and synchronized entirely. For large datasets, this approach is not bandwidth-efficient or cost-effective.

B) Enabling Cloud Tiering is the correct solution. Cloud Tiering allows frequently accessed files to remain on the local server, while infrequently accessed files are moved to Azure. Placeholder files remain on the server to represent tiered content. When a user requests a file, it is downloaded from Azure on-demand. This approach reduces local storage requirements, optimizes network bandwidth, and ensures users can access all files transparently. Cloud Tiering also enables centralized backup and disaster recovery without overloading the network. It is fully compatible with hybrid file management strategies, balancing local performance and cloud storage efficiency.

C) Using DFS Replication only replicates files between on-premises servers and cannot integrate with Azure Files for cloud tiering. DFS Replication ensures redundancy but does not reduce local storage requirements or optimize bandwidth for hybrid cloud scenarios.

D) Enabling Azure Backup protects file data but does not optimize storage usage or provide on-demand file access. Backup ensures recoverability but does not address network efficiency or local storage management.

Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync ensures optimal bandwidth utilization, minimizes local storage requirements, and provides seamless user access to files in hybrid environments, making it the recommended configuration.

Question 25:

You are deploying Windows Server 2022 in a hybrid environment. You need to ensure that only devices compliant with Intune policies can access Microsoft 365 and other cloud resources. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable Windows Defender Firewall on all devices.

B) Configure Conditional Access policies in Azure AD with Intune integration.

C) Deploy BitLocker encryption on all devices.

D) Use local Group Policy to enforce access restrictions.

Answer: B) Configure Conditional Access policies in Azure AD with Intune integration.

Explanation:

A) Enabling Windows Defender Firewall protects endpoints from unauthorized network traffic, but it does not evaluate device compliance or enforce access to cloud resources. While firewalls are important for device security, they cannot determine whether a device meets Intune compliance requirements, making this solution insufficient.

B) Configuring Conditional Access policies in Azure AD integrated with Intune compliance is the correct solution. Conditional Access evaluates device compliance based on Intune policies, user identity, location, and risk factors before granting access to Microsoft 365 and other cloud resources. Devices that are non-compliant can be blocked or remediated before access is granted. This ensures that only secure, compliant devices access sensitive corporate resources. Conditional Access provides centralized enforcement, reporting, and auditing, making it ideal for hybrid environments with both on-premises and cloud-joined devices.

C) Deploying BitLocker encryption enhances security by protecting data at rest, but it does not enforce access restrictions to cloud services. BitLocker alone cannot evaluate overall compliance, so it does not meet the requirement.

D) Using local Group Policy to enforce access restrictions is limited to on-premises domain-joined devices and cannot manage Azure AD or hybrid-joined devices. It also lacks integration with Intune or Conditional Access, making it unsuitable for enforcing access based on device compliance in hybrid environments.

Conditional Access policies integrated with Intune compliance enforcement provide a robust, scalable, and dynamic method to ensure that only compliant devices access corporate cloud resources, aligning with modern hybrid security practices.

Question 26:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment with Azure AD integration. You need to ensure that administrative tasks performed by privileged users are audited and recorded for compliance purposes. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable local auditing on each server manually.

B) Deploy Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) and enable auditing.

C) Configure DFS Replication to log administrative actions.

D) Use Azure Backup to track administrative activity.

Answer: B) Deploy Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) and enable auditing.

Explanation:

A) Enabling local auditing on each server manually allows tracking of administrative actions through the Windows Event Log. While this can capture local activity, it is not scalable in a hybrid environment with numerous servers and cloud-based resources. Maintaining local auditing across all servers is labor-intensive, prone to inconsistencies, and lacks centralized reporting or correlation for compliance. Additionally, local auditing does not capture privileged actions taken in cloud resources, making it insufficient for hybrid environments.

B) Deploying Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) is the correct solution. PIM provides just-in-time privileged access to Azure AD, Azure resources, and hybrid servers integrated with Azure AD. It enables administrators to request elevated access only when needed, reducing the risk of standing administrative privileges. PIM also provides detailed auditing of all privileged actions, including who performed the action, when it occurred, and what changes were made. These logs are centrally stored, searchable, and can be integrated with SIEM solutions for compliance reporting and regulatory auditing. PIM ensures that administrative tasks are secure, controlled, and auditable across hybrid environments, meeting enterprise compliance requirements.

C) DFS Replication replicates files between servers but does not log administrative actions or changes to system configurations. While DFS ensures data consistency and redundancy, it is not a tool for auditing privileged access or tracking administrative activity. Using DFS alone cannot satisfy compliance requirements for auditing.

D) Azure Backup protects data by storing recovery points in Azure. While critical for disaster recovery, Azure Backup does not record or track administrative actions or policy changes. Backup is a data protection mechanism, not an auditing or compliance tool, and cannot ensure regulatory compliance for privileged user activities.

Azure AD PIM provides a centralized, automated, and auditable mechanism to manage and monitor privileged access in hybrid environments. It reduces risk while providing detailed logging for compliance and regulatory purposes.

Question 27:

You are planning a hybrid Windows Server 2022 deployment. You need to implement centralized patch management to ensure all servers are updated automatically with minimal administrative effort. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure Windows Update manually on each server.

B) Deploy Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) with hybrid Azure integration.

C) Enable Windows Defender Antivirus updates only.

D) Use Azure Backup to maintain previous update states.

Answer: B) Deploy Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) with hybrid Azure integration.

Explanation:

A) Configuring Windows Update manually on each server is not scalable in a hybrid environment. It requires individual attention to each server, increasing administrative overhead and the risk of missing updates. Manual configuration cannot ensure compliance, nor does it provide centralized reporting or scheduling for multiple servers, making it unsuitable for enterprise-scale hybrid deployments.

B) Deploying WSUS with hybrid Azure integration is the correct solution. WSUS allows administrators to centrally manage and approve updates for on-premises servers. With hybrid integration, WSUS can also manage updates for Azure-based servers, providing consistent patch management across the environment. Administrators can schedule updates, enforce compliance, and generate reports for auditing. WSUS reduces manual effort, ensures servers remain up-to-date, and supports testing updates before deployment to prevent disruptions. Integration with Azure enables hybrid workloads to be patched efficiently, maintaining security and compliance.

C) Enabling Windows Defender Antivirus updates only ensures that malware definitions are current, but it does not manage operating system patches, security updates, or application updates. Antivirus updates alone do not fulfill enterprise requirements for full patch management across hybrid servers.

D) Using Azure Backup maintains copies of server data, including prior system states, but does not apply updates or ensure servers remain patched. Backup is a disaster recovery mechanism and cannot enforce proactive update management. Relying on backup alone does not meet the requirement for automated, centralized patching.

WSUS with hybrid Azure integration provides centralized control, automation, compliance tracking, and scheduling for patches, ensuring all Windows Server 2022 instances—both on-premises and in Azure—remain secure and up-to-date.

Question 28:

You are managing Windows Server 2022 in a hybrid environment. You want to enable secure remote administration without exposing RDP ports to the internet. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable RDP for all servers over the internet.

B) Use Windows Admin Center with HTTPS and Azure AD authentication.

C) Deploy a VPN for each administrator.

D) Configure PowerShell Remoting over HTTP.

Answer: B) Use Windows Admin Center with HTTPS and Azure AD authentication.

Explanation:

A) Enabling RDP over the internet exposes servers to potential attacks such as brute-force attempts, ransomware, and unauthorized access. Even with strong passwords or NLA, RDP exposure is considered a high-security risk. It is not recommended for hybrid environments, particularly for servers hosting sensitive workloads or cloud-connected resources.

B) Using Windows Admin Center with HTTPS and Azure AD authentication is the correct solution. This configuration allows administrators to securely manage servers remotely without exposing RDP to the public internet. The gateway uses HTTPS to encrypt communication, ensuring secure transport of credentials and management commands. Integration with Azure AD enables centralized authentication, role-based access control, and optional multi-factor authentication. This approach supports on-premises and Azure-based servers, providing secure, scalable, and auditable remote administration. Administrators can perform management tasks through a web interface without requiring direct RDP access, reducing attack surface and aligning with hybrid security best practices.

C) Deploying a VPN for each administrator provides encrypted remote access to on-premises resources. While VPNs are secure for network connectivity, they require additional configuration, maintenance, and management overhead. VPNs do not provide centralized server management, reporting, or role-based access control. This solution is less scalable and less integrated than Windows Admin Center for hybrid environments.

D) Configuring PowerShell Remoting over HTTP is insecure because HTTP traffic is unencrypted. While HTTPS can secure PowerShell Remoting, HTTP exposes credentials and data in transit, creating a significant security risk. PowerShell Remoting also lacks the centralized GUI management, auditing, and policy enforcement available in Windows Admin Center.

Windows Admin Center with HTTPS and Azure AD authentication provides a secure, centralized, and hybrid-compatible solution for remote server administration, eliminating the need to expose RDP to external networks.

Question 29:

You are implementing Azure File Sync for a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You need to allow only specific users to access certain folders based on Active Directory group membership. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure NTFS permissions on the on-premises file server.

B) Use Azure RBAC for file-level permissions.

C) Enable public access and rely on passwords.

D) Use DFS Replication to enforce permissions.

Answer: A) Configure NTFS permissions on the on-premises file server.

Explanation:

A) Configuring NTFS permissions on the local file server is the correct approach. NTFS permissions allow fine-grained control over files and folders based on user or group membership in Active Directory. Azure File Sync respects these NTFS permissions during synchronization, ensuring that security settings applied on-premises propagate to Azure Files. Users can only access files and folders for which they have explicit permissions. This method integrates seamlessly with existing hybrid identity setups and supports compliance requirements.

B) Azure RBAC manages access to Azure resources such as storage accounts or file shares but cannot enforce folder-level access within a file share. RBAC is useful for administrative control over the storage account but does not satisfy the requirement for controlling access to specific folders based on AD groups.

C) Enabling public access with password protection is insecure and violates enterprise security best practices. Public access exposes files to anyone with the link, and password-only protection does not integrate with hybrid identity or allow fine-grained folder-level access control.

D) DFS Replication replicates files between servers but does not enforce or manage folder-level permissions. DFS ensures redundancy and consistency but cannot replace NTFS permissions for access control.

NTFS permissions provide secure, granular, and hybrid-compatible control over access to folders in Azure File Sync-enabled servers, ensuring that only authorized users have access to sensitive data.

Question 30:

You are deploying Windows Server 2022 in a hybrid environment. You need to implement centralized monitoring, reporting, and alerting for performance, health, and security events across on-premises and Azure-based servers. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable Event Viewer on each server individually.

B) Deploy Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and schedule alerts.

C) Use DFS Replication to track server logs.

D) Enable Azure Backup for monitoring purposes.

Answer: B) Deploy Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and schedule alerts.

Explanation:

A) Enabling Event Viewer individually on each server allows local logging and monitoring but is not scalable in a hybrid environment with numerous servers. Administrators would need to manually review logs, and there is no centralized reporting or alerting. This method is time-consuming, inefficient, and prone to human error.

B) Deploying Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension is the correct solution. The Insights extension provides centralized monitoring of system health, performance metrics, and security events across both on-premises and Azure-hosted servers. It supports automated alerts, threshold-based notifications, and scheduled reports. Administrators can proactively identify potential issues such as high CPU usage, low memory, disk capacity problems, or security anomalies. Insights integrates with Windows Admin Center’s secure management interface, providing unified management and reducing administrative overhead. This solution is scalable, hybrid-ready, and supports proactive, automated monitoring for enterprise-grade infrastructure.

C) DFS Replication ensures file consistency between servers but does not collect performance metrics or provide alerting. DFS cannot generate centralized reports on server health or security, making it unsuitable for monitoring and reporting.

D) Azure Backup protects data but does not monitor performance or server health. Backup ensures recoverability but cannot trigger alerts or provide centralized reporting for proactive management.

Windows Admin Center with Insights provides centralized, automated monitoring, reporting, and alerting, enabling administrators to maintain visibility and control over hybrid server environments while reducing operational complexity.

Question 31:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You need to deploy an automated solution that monitors server health, performance, and critical events, and can send alerts to administrators when thresholds are exceeded. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure Event Viewer manually on each server.

B) Use Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and alerting.

C) Enable DFS Replication to synchronize logs.

D) Enable Azure Backup notifications.

Answer: B) Use Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and alerting.

Explanation:

A) Configuring Event Viewer manually on each server allows local monitoring of logs, errors, and warnings. Administrators can review system, application, and security events individually. However, this method is not scalable in a hybrid environment with dozens or hundreds of servers. It requires manual effort to identify critical events, cannot provide centralized dashboards, and cannot send automated alerts to administrators. While Event Viewer is a useful diagnostic tool for individual servers, it lacks the automation, scalability, and centralized alerting required for enterprise-grade hybrid infrastructure.

B) Using Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and alerting is the correct solution. The Insights extension provides a centralized dashboard to monitor server health, performance metrics, storage, memory, CPU utilization, and security events across both on-premises and Azure-hosted servers. Thresholds can be configured for key performance indicators, and administrators are notified via automated alerts when these thresholds are exceeded. Insights also provides historical data and reporting capabilities for trend analysis, capacity planning, and compliance auditing. This approach is fully scalable, supports hybrid deployments, reduces manual monitoring, and ensures proactive management of critical infrastructure. Integration with Windows Admin Center provides secure web-based access, and administrators can perform management actions directly from the dashboard without exposing RDP or other administrative ports. This centralized monitoring solution reduces operational complexity, increases responsiveness, and ensures that critical server issues are addressed promptly.

C) Enabling DFS Replication synchronizes files and folders between multiple servers for redundancy and high availability. While DFS ensures data consistency across locations, it does not collect performance metrics, monitor server health, or provide alerting capabilities. DFS Replication cannot track CPU, memory, disk space, or event logs, making it unsuitable as a monitoring and alerting solution.

D) Enabling Azure Backup notifications allows administrators to receive alerts regarding backup job successes or failures. However, Azure Backup does not monitor real-time server performance, system health, or security events. While backup notifications are important for disaster recovery planning, they do not provide proactive monitoring of server health or performance and cannot replace a centralized monitoring solution like Windows Admin Center Insights.

By deploying Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension, administrators gain a comprehensive, centralized monitoring and alerting system for hybrid Windows Server 2022 environments. This solution ensures servers remain healthy, performance bottlenecks are identified early, and administrators are promptly notified of critical issues, improving operational efficiency and security.

Question 32:

You are deploying a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment with Azure AD integration. You need to ensure that only devices meeting company compliance standards can access Microsoft 365 and other sensitive cloud services. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure Windows Defender Firewall to block non-compliant devices.

B) Deploy BitLocker encryption on all devices.

C) Implement Conditional Access policies in Azure AD integrated with Intune compliance.

D) Use local Group Policy to enforce compliance restrictions.

Answer: C) Implement Conditional Access policies in Azure AD integrated with Intune compliance.

Explanation:

A) Configuring Windows Defender Firewall enhances endpoint security by controlling inbound and outbound network traffic. However, firewalls do not evaluate device compliance or enforce access to cloud applications. While firewalls are an important component of device security, they cannot ensure that only compliant devices connect to Microsoft 365 or other sensitive cloud resources. Firewalls operate at the network level and are insufficient for hybrid identity enforcement.

B) Deploying BitLocker encryption provides strong protection for data at rest by encrypting device storage. While BitLocker is often a requirement for device compliance, encryption alone does not verify overall device compliance. A device with BitLocker enabled may still be missing security patches, antivirus updates, or other required configurations. BitLocker does not integrate directly with access control policies for cloud resources, so it cannot enforce compliance-based access.

C) Implementing Conditional Access policies in Azure AD integrated with Intune compliance is the correct solution. Conditional Access evaluates a device’s compliance status, user identity, location, and risk factors before granting access to cloud resources like Microsoft 365. Intune defines compliance policies, including patch levels, antivirus deployment, firewall configuration, encryption, and other security settings. Conditional Access enforces access control dynamically: non-compliant devices can be blocked or required to remediate issues before access is allowed. This approach provides centralized enforcement, reporting, and auditing, ensuring that only devices meeting corporate security standards access sensitive resources. Integration with Azure AD and hybrid environments allows seamless control for both on-premises and cloud-joined devices.

D) Using local Group Policy can enforce security configurations on on-premises AD-joined devices but cannot control access to cloud resources or Azure AD-joined devices. Group Policy does not provide dynamic, conditional access based on compliance status and is unsuitable for hybrid deployments.

Conditional Access policies integrated with Intune compliance enforcement provide a robust, scalable, and dynamic solution for controlling access to sensitive corporate resources. This approach aligns with modern enterprise security requirements and ensures that only secure, compliant devices gain access.

Question 33:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You need to deploy a solution to centralize file storage in Azure while keeping frequently accessed files on-premises and reducing local storage usage. Which configuration should you implement?

A) Disable Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync.

B) Enable Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync.

C) Use DFS Replication to synchronize files.

D) Configure Azure Backup only.

Answer: B) Enable Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync.

Explanation:

A) Disabling Cloud Tiering keeps all files fully stored on the local server. While this ensures offline availability, it consumes significant local storage and does not optimize bandwidth usage. Large file shares may overwhelm on-premises storage capacity, increase replication traffic, and limit scalability in hybrid deployments. Disabling tiering is not suitable for organizations seeking to optimize storage efficiency while maintaining cloud centralization.

B) Enabling Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync is the correct solution. Cloud Tiering allows frequently accessed files to remain on local servers while moving infrequently accessed files to Azure Files. Placeholder files remain locally, providing seamless access for users. When a user requests a tiered file, it is downloaded on-demand from Azure. This approach reduces local storage usage, optimizes network bandwidth, and ensures centralized backup and disaster recovery without compromising user access. Cloud Tiering supports hybrid environments by maintaining on-premises performance for commonly used files and cost-effective cloud storage for archival or infrequently accessed data. Azure File Sync automatically manages tiered files, ensuring synchronization, auditing, and compliance with enterprise storage policies.

C) Using DFS Replication synchronizes files between on-premises servers but does not integrate with Azure Files for cloud storage tiering. DFS ensures redundancy but cannot reduce local storage usage, optimize network bandwidth, or provide on-demand access from Azure. DFS alone is insufficient for hybrid cloud storage centralization.

D) Configuring Azure Backup protects files in Azure but does not provide seamless access, tiering, or bandwidth optimization. Backup ensures recoverability but cannot dynamically manage which files remain on-premises or in the cloud, making it inadequate for hybrid file management objectives.

Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync provides the most efficient hybrid solution for centralizing storage in Azure while maintaining on-premises performance and minimizing local storage usage. It balances cost, efficiency, and user experience.

Question 34:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You want to implement a secure, centralized solution for managing server updates, security patches, and compliance across both on-premises and Azure servers. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable Windows Update individually on each server.

B) Deploy Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) with hybrid integration.

C) Enable Windows Defender Antivirus updates only.

D) Use Azure Backup to track update status.

Answer: B) Deploy Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) with hybrid integration.

Explanation:

A) Enabling Windows Update on each server individually is not scalable for hybrid environments. Manual updates increase administrative overhead, create inconsistent patch levels, and risk missed critical updates. This method does not provide centralized reporting, scheduling, or compliance auditing for multiple servers. It is impractical for enterprise-scale deployments where both on-premises and Azure-hosted servers exist.

B) Deploying WSUS with hybrid integration is the correct solution. WSUS allows administrators to centrally manage, approve, and schedule updates for all servers in the environment. Hybrid integration enables Azure-hosted VMs to receive updates from WSUS, ensuring consistent patching across both on-premises and cloud resources. WSUS provides reporting, compliance tracking, and testing capabilities to minimize disruption during patch deployment. By using WSUS, administrators can automate update management, enforce compliance policies, and reduce security vulnerabilities across the hybrid infrastructure. This approach aligns with enterprise best practices for centralized patch management.

C) Enabling Windows Defender Antivirus updates only ensures that malware definitions remain current but does not manage operating system or application patches. While important, antivirus updates alone do not meet the requirements for centralized update management or compliance enforcement across hybrid servers.

D) Azure Backup ensures recovery points for servers but does not enforce patch deployment or track update compliance. Backup is a data protection solution, not a patch management system, and cannot meet the requirement for centralized, automated update enforcement.

WSUS with hybrid integration provides a centralized, automated, and auditable approach to managing updates, security patches, and compliance across on-premises and Azure-based Windows Server 2022 instances.

Question 35:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You want to allow administrators to perform role-based management of servers without granting full local administrative rights. Which solution should you implement?

A) Create local accounts with full administrative rights.

B) Use Windows Admin Center RBAC extension.

C) Enable RDP and restrict IP addresses.

D) Deploy Group Policy to configure local admin rights.

Answer: B) Use Windows Admin Center RBAC extension.

Explanation:

A) Creating local accounts with full administrative rights is not recommended. While it grants access, it lacks granularity, central management, and auditing. Administrators would have unrestricted access to all functions, increasing the risk of accidental or malicious changes. Managing multiple servers with local accounts becomes cumbersome in hybrid environments.

B) Using Windows Admin Center RBAC extension is the correct solution. The RBAC extension allows administrators to assign granular roles for managing specific servers or server groups. It integrates with Active Directory or Azure AD, providing centralized control, auditing, and delegation. Administrators can perform tasks according to their assigned role without full local administrative privileges. RBAC ensures security and compliance while supporting scalable management across hybrid environments. Auditing within Windows Admin Center tracks all administrative actions, providing accountability.

C) Enabling RDP and restricting IP addresses provides network-level control but does not restrict administrative actions or enforce role-based access. Administrators with RDP access may still have full privileges, and this solution lacks centralized management and auditing.

D) Deploying Group Policy can configure local admin rights on on-premises servers, but it cannot enforce granular RBAC for hybrid or Azure-hosted servers. It lacks the centralized delegation and auditing capabilities provided by Windows Admin Center RBAC.

Windows Admin Center RBAC provides secure, scalable, and role-based administrative control across hybrid Windows Server 2022 environments, minimizing risk while supporting compliance and centralized management.

Question 36:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You need to ensure that on-premises and Azure-based file servers replicate data efficiently while allowing end-users to access files seamlessly. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable DFS Replication only.

B) Configure Azure File Sync with Cloud Tiering.

C) Use Azure Backup to synchronize files.

D) Enable manual file copy scripts across servers.

Answer: B) Configure Azure File Sync with Cloud Tiering.

Explanation:

A) Enabling DFS Replication only allows files to replicate between on-premises servers. While DFS ensures redundancy and consistency within on-premises environments, it does not integrate with Azure storage, cannot perform tiering, and does not optimize bandwidth for hybrid deployments. DFS also cannot provide seamless access to files stored in Azure by end-users, making it insufficient for hybrid requirements.

B) Configuring Azure File Sync with Cloud Tiering is the correct solution. Azure File Sync enables on-premises file servers to synchronize with Azure Files, providing a centralized cloud repository. Cloud Tiering optimizes storage by keeping frequently accessed files on-premises and moving infrequently accessed files to Azure. Placeholder files remain locally, providing seamless on-demand access for end-users. This approach reduces local storage requirements, optimizes bandwidth usage, and ensures centralized backup and disaster recovery. Azure File Sync also supports hybrid scenarios, allowing administrators to manage files centrally while maintaining local performance for frequently used data. Automated replication, synchronization, and tiering reduce administrative overhead and enhance operational efficiency.

C) Using Azure Backup to synchronize files does not provide real-time replication or seamless user access. Backup solutions are designed for data protection and recovery, not for active file sharing or tiering. Azure Backup cannot optimize storage usage or provide on-demand access for users.

D) Enabling manual file copy scripts is impractical for enterprise environments. Manual scripts are error-prone, difficult to scale, and cannot provide real-time synchronization or access control. Managing file replication manually across multiple servers is inefficient and does not meet hybrid performance and accessibility requirements.

Azure File Sync with Cloud Tiering ensures efficient replication, reduced local storage, seamless access, and simplified management across hybrid environments, making it the ideal solution for this scenario.

Question 37:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You need to enforce that only compliant devices can access sensitive cloud applications while providing administrators the ability to monitor and remediate non-compliant devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable Windows Defender Firewall on all devices.

B) Configure Azure AD Conditional Access integrated with Intune compliance policies.

C) Deploy BitLocker encryption across all devices.

D) Use local Group Policy to enforce device compliance.

Answer: B) Configure Azure AD Conditional Access integrated with Intune compliance policies.

Explanation:

A) Enabling Windows Defender Firewall helps protect devices from unauthorized network access, but it does not evaluate device compliance or enforce access restrictions for cloud applications. Firewall policies operate at the network level and do not integrate with Azure AD or Intune to determine whether a device meets corporate security standards. While important for endpoint security, firewalls alone cannot enforce conditional access based on compliance.

B) Configuring Azure AD Conditional Access integrated with Intune compliance policies is the correct solution. Conditional Access evaluates device compliance, user identity, location, and risk before granting access to cloud applications. Intune defines compliance policies that include security baselines, patch levels, antivirus status, encryption, firewall configurations, and other requirements. When a device does not meet these policies, access can be blocked, or the user can be prompted to remediate issues. This integration provides administrators with visibility into non-compliant devices, enabling monitoring, reporting, and remediation. Conditional Access ensures secure, dynamic enforcement for hybrid environments, covering both on-premises and cloud-managed devices.

C) Deploying BitLocker encryption enhances device security by protecting data at rest but does not enforce overall compliance or access control for cloud resources. Encryption is one aspect of a compliance baseline but cannot replace conditional access or centralized policy enforcement.

D) Using local Group Policy enforces settings on on-premises AD-joined devices but cannot evaluate or enforce compliance for cloud applications or Azure AD-joined devices. Group Policy lacks integration with Intune or Conditional Access and is unsuitable for hybrid access enforcement.

Conditional Access combined with Intune compliance provides a centralized, automated, and auditable approach to ensure only secure, compliant devices can access sensitive applications, aligning with modern hybrid security practices.

Question 38:

You are planning a hybrid Windows Server 2022 deployment. You need to monitor server performance, health, and security events centrally for both on-premises and Azure-based servers. Which solution should you implement?

A) Enable Event Viewer on all servers individually.

B) Deploy Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and alerting.

C) Use DFS Replication to track logs.

D) Configure Azure Backup alerts for monitoring.

Answer: B) Deploy Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and alerting.

Explanation:

A) Enabling Event Viewer individually on each server provides local logging for system, application, and security events. While it can help administrators troubleshoot individual servers, it is not scalable for hybrid environments. Manual monitoring is time-consuming, lacks centralized reporting, and cannot send automated alerts. Event Viewer alone does not provide trend analysis, capacity planning, or cross-server insights.

B) Deploying Windows Admin Center with the Insights extension and alerting is the correct solution. The Insights extension enables centralized monitoring of CPU, memory, disk usage, network performance, and security events across hybrid environments. Administrators can configure thresholds, schedule automated alerts, and generate reports to identify trends or potential issues. Historical performance metrics allow for capacity planning and proactive problem detection. This solution integrates seamlessly with both on-premises and Azure-hosted servers, reducing administrative overhead and providing a comprehensive view of the hybrid infrastructure. Centralized dashboards also allow administrators to manage servers directly, eliminating the need for direct RDP connections.

C) DFS Replication ensures files remain consistent between servers but does not collect performance metrics, monitor system health, or provide alerting. DFS cannot be used as a monitoring tool, making it unsuitable for the scenario.

D) Azure Backup provides notifications for backup successes or failures, but it does not monitor real-time performance, server health, or security events. Backup solutions ensure recoverability but cannot serve as a centralized monitoring and alerting system.

Windows Admin Center with Insights provides proactive, scalable, and centralized monitoring for hybrid environments, ensuring administrators can maintain server health, optimize performance, and address issues before they impact users or services.

Question 39:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You need to centralize file storage in Azure while reducing local storage usage and ensuring users can still access files seamlessly. Which solution should you implement?

A) Disable Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync.

B) Enable Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync.

C) Use DFS Replication for file synchronization.

D) Configure Azure Backup only.

Answer: B) Enable Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync.

Explanation:

A) Disabling Cloud Tiering keeps all files fully stored on local servers. While this ensures offline availability, it consumes significant on-premises storage and increases bandwidth usage during replication. Large file shares can overwhelm local storage and reduce operational efficiency.

B) Enabling Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync is the correct solution. Cloud Tiering moves infrequently accessed files to Azure while keeping frequently used files on local servers. Placeholder files remain on-premises, allowing seamless on-demand access. This approach optimizes local storage, reduces bandwidth usage, and ensures centralized backup and disaster recovery in Azure. Users experience no disruption as files are downloaded automatically when accessed. Azure File Sync with Cloud Tiering is ideal for hybrid environments, balancing performance, storage efficiency, and operational simplicity.

C) Using DFS Replication synchronizes files between servers but does not integrate with Azure storage for tiering or on-demand access. DFS ensures redundancy but cannot reduce local storage requirements or optimize hybrid cloud performance.

D) Configuring Azure Backup only protects data by storing copies in Azure but does not provide real-time replication, tiering, or on-demand file access. Backup ensures recoverability but does not address operational efficiency or seamless access for end-users.

Cloud Tiering in Azure File Sync provides the optimal solution for hybrid file storage, reducing local storage usage while ensuring seamless access to all files.

Question 40:

You are managing a hybrid Windows Server 2022 environment. You need to enforce granular administrative access on servers while minimizing the risk of granting full local administrative privileges. Which solution should you implement?

A) Create local accounts with full administrative rights on each server.

B) Use Windows Admin Center RBAC extension.

C) Enable RDP access for all administrators.

D) Deploy Group Policy to configure local administrator rights.

Answer: B) Use Windows Admin Center RBAC extension.

Explanation:

A) Creating local accounts with full administrative rights grants unrestricted access but lacks granularity and centralized management. Managing multiple servers manually is labor-intensive and increases the risk of accidental or malicious changes. Local accounts also lack auditing and reporting for compliance purposes.

B) Using Windows Admin Center RBAC extension is the correct solution. The RBAC extension allows administrators to assign roles that provide specific management capabilities for servers or server groups. Integration with Active Directory or Azure AD allows centralized management, auditing, and delegation. Administrators can perform tasks based on their assigned role without full local administrative privileges. RBAC minimizes risk while maintaining operational flexibility and compliance. All actions are auditable, ensuring accountability and meeting enterprise security standards. This solution scales efficiently across hybrid environments, including on-premises and Azure-hosted servers.

C) Enabling RDP access provides network-level remote administration but does not limit what administrators can do once connected. It lacks role-based access control and auditing, increasing security risks in hybrid environments.

D) Deploying Group Policy to configure local administrator rights applies only to on-premises AD-joined devices and cannot enforce granular role-based access for hybrid or Azure AD-joined servers. Group Policy cannot provide the fine-grained RBAC, auditing, or centralized control available in Windows Admin Center.

Windows Admin Center RBAC extension provides secure, scalable, and centralized role-based administrative access for hybrid Windows Server 2022 environments, minimizing risk while ensuring accountability.