Google  Professional Data Engineer on Google Cloud Platform Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 3 Q 41- 60

Visit here for our full Google Professional Data Engineer exam dumps and practice test questions.

Q41

A company wants to build a streaming data pipeline to analyze website clickstream data in real-time. The system must handle millions of events per second, ensure exactly-once processing, and provide low-latency dashboards. Which architecture is most appropriate?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery provide a fully managed, serverless architecture for real-time streaming analytics, ideal for handling millions of clickstream events per second. Cloud Pub/Sub is designed to ingest high-throughput data from multiple sources, buffering traffic spikes and guaranteeing message durability. It supports horizontal scaling to accommodate varying workloads without manual intervention. Dataflow, leveraging Apache Beam, processes the streaming data with exactly-once semantics through stateful processing and checkpointing, ensuring that each event is processed precisely once even in the case of transient failures. Dataflow supports windowing, aggregations, and enrichment operations required for real-time dashboards, such as active user counts, session duration, and funnel analysis. BigQuery acts as the analytics layer, storing raw and transformed data for both immediate queries and historical analysis. Its serverless, columnar architecture enables rapid, petabyte-scale queries without infrastructure management. Together, this architecture ensures low-latency reporting, high reliability, and scalability, making it the best choice for clickstream analytics.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is a batch-oriented solution. Clickstream events are first written to Cloud Storage, then processed periodically using Dataproc clusters. While Dataproc can handle large volumes, this introduces latency unsuitable for real-time dashboards. Exactly-once processing is not inherently guaranteed, and spikes in traffic can overwhelm batch processing, delaying insights. Manual cluster management adds operational overhead, making it less practical for high-throughput, real-time pipelines.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery cannot efficiently process millions of events per second. Cloud SQL is a relational database optimized for transactional workloads, which becomes a bottleneck at large scale. Cloud Functions have execution limits and stateless behavior, making exactly-once processing and windowed aggregations complex and error-prone. Scaling such a system requires additional orchestration and infrastructure, increasing complexity and cost.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery could store raw clickstream events due to Bigtable’s high-throughput capabilities. However, Cloud Run is stateless and cannot provide distributed stream processing with exactly-once semantics. Implementing windowed aggregations, deduplication, and real-time dashboards would require custom orchestration, making this approach operationally complex compared to the integrated Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery pipeline.

Q42

A company needs to process sensitive customer data in BigQuery for analytics while ensuring GDPR compliance. Data must be anonymized or masked, and PII must be detected automatically. Which GCP service is best suited for this task?

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

B) Cloud KMS

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)

D) Cloud Functions

Answer

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is designed for managing sensitive data and ensuring compliance with regulations such as GDPR. DLP can automatically discover, classify, and transform personally identifiable information (PII) across BigQuery datasets, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub streams. Built-in detectors identify sensitive data types like names, addresses, credit card numbers, and social security numbers. Transformation techniques include masking, tokenization, redaction, and format-preserving encryption, enabling analytics without exposing raw PII. DLP supports structured and semi-structured data, integrates directly with BigQuery, and allows inline anonymization during query execution. Logging and audit features provide a record of anonymization actions, supporting compliance reporting and governance. Using DLP ensures analysts can perform analytics on anonymized data while maintaining privacy, reducing legal risk and operational complexity.

B) Cloud KMS provides encryption key management and secures data at rest, but it does not detect, mask, or anonymize PII for analytics. While KMS protects confidentiality, it does not allow selective anonymization, which is required for GDPR-compliant data processing.

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) secures access to applications by enforcing authentication and authorization policies. While it protects against unauthorized access, it does not provide PII detection or anonymization capabilities within datasets.

D) Cloud Functions can implement custom anonymization logic but require significant development effort, testing, and maintenance. Functions lack built-in PII detection and transformation capabilities, making them less reliable and more error-prone compared to Cloud DLP for GDPR compliance.

Q43

A company wants to monitor BigQuery query costs and generate automated alerts for unusually expensive queries. The solution must be serverless, scalable, and provide near real-time notifications. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

B) Query BigQuery in Cloud SQL manually

C) Export logs to Cloud Storage and process offline

D) Store query metadata in Bigtable and poll for alerts

Answer

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

Explanation

A) INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables in BigQuery provide metadata on all queries, including execution time, bytes processed, and costs. By using Cloud Functions to query these tables periodically, anomalous queries can be detected automatically. Cloud Functions can then publish alerts to Pub/Sub or other notification channels, providing near real-time alerts without requiring manual intervention. This solution is fully serverless, scales automatically with query volume, and minimizes operational overhead. It allows proactive monitoring of query costs and operational visibility for optimization. Alerts can be configured to trigger on thresholds, such as queries exceeding a specific byte scan or cost, enabling rapid response to prevent runaway expenses.

B) Querying BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually is not scalable. Cloud SQL is not optimized to store or analyze metadata at large scale, and manual queries would result in delayed alerts and higher operational overhead.

C) Exporting logs to Cloud Storage and analyzing offline introduces latency. Alerts are delayed and not suitable for near real-time detection of cost anomalies.

D) Using Cloud Bigtable to store query metadata and poll for alerts adds operational complexity. Bigtable is optimized for key-value workloads, but ingesting metadata, implementing polling, and managing alerting logic increases complexity unnecessarily compared to serverless Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub.

Q44

A company wants to store and analyze petabytes of IoT sensor data in BigQuery. Queries often filter by timestamp and device type. Which table design provides optimal performance and cost efficiency?

A) Partition by ingestion time and cluster by device type

B) Partition by device type and cluster by timestamp

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create separate tables per device type

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion time and cluster by device type

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion time enables BigQuery to scan only relevant partitions when queries filter by timestamp, reducing the volume of scanned data and lowering query costs. Clustering by device type organizes rows physically by device, improving query efficiency when filtering or aggregating by device type. This design is scalable to petabyte-level datasets and supports efficient storage management. Using a single table simplifies schema management and reduces operational overhead. BigQuery automatically handles partition maintenance, metadata management, and scaling, while clustering ensures that common queries are executed efficiently with lower latency. This approach provides both cost and performance optimization for time-series IoT data analytics.

B) Partitioning by device type is inefficient because large-scale IoT deployments often have thousands or millions of devices, resulting in many small partitions that increase metadata overhead and reduce query performance. Clustering by timestamp alone does not optimize filtering by device type.

C) Using a single unpartitioned table is inefficient at petabyte scale. Queries filtering by timestamp or device type would scan the entire dataset, increasing cost and query time significantly.

D) Creating separate tables per device type introduces operational complexity. Schema updates, cross-device queries, and table management at scale become cumbersome, increasing the likelihood of errors and administrative overhead.

Q45

A financial company wants to implement a real-time fraud detection pipeline for credit card transactions. The pipeline must handle high-volume streaming data, provide exactly-once processing, and enable low-latency alerts. Which architecture is most appropriate?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub ingests high-volume credit card transactions reliably, buffering spikes in traffic. Dataflow processes the streaming transactions in real-time using stateful operations, deduplication, and windowed computations to ensure exactly-once processing. Fraud detection logic, such as pattern detection, threshold alerts, and anomaly scoring, can be applied in-flight. BigQuery stores both raw and aggregated results for analytics, reporting, and further investigation. This architecture is fully managed, serverless, and automatically scales to meet demand, ensuring low-latency alerts for fraud detection. It handles failure recovery and automatically manages resource allocation, making it ideal for high-throughput, real-time financial transaction monitoring.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented. Writing transactions to files and processing them periodically introduces latency, making real-time fraud detection impractical. Exactly-once semantics are not guaranteed, and spikes in transaction volume can overwhelm batch jobs.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery cannot scale for high-throughput streaming data. Cloud SQL is optimized for transactional workloads and would be a bottleneck. Cloud Functions have execution limits and stateless behavior, making exactly-once processing difficult for continuous streaming data.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery could store transaction data efficiently, but Cloud Run is stateless and does not provide distributed stream processing or exactly-once semantics. Implementing fraud detection logic requires additional orchestration, increasing operational complexity and reducing reliability.

Q46

A company wants to build a serverless data pipeline that collects IoT device telemetry in real-time, performs anomaly detection, and stores results for analytics. The system must scale automatically, guarantee exactly-once processing, and provide low-latency insights. Which architecture is most suitable?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery form an integrated, serverless architecture that is ideal for streaming IoT telemetry and anomaly detection. Cloud Pub/Sub acts as a high-throughput, durable message ingestion system, capable of handling millions of device events per second. It buffers incoming messages during spikes in traffic, ensuring no data is lost. Dataflow, built on Apache Beam, processes streaming data with exactly-once semantics using stateful operations, deduplication, and checkpointing. This ensures that every message is processed precisely once, even in the event of retries or failures, which is critical for accurate anomaly detection. Dataflow supports complex transformations, including windowed aggregations, filtering, and enrichment, enabling detection of anomalies such as sudden spikes in temperature, sensor malfunctions, or out-of-range readings. BigQuery serves as the analytics layer, storing both raw and processed results for historical and real-time analysis. Its columnar, serverless architecture enables low-latency queries and scales automatically to petabyte-sized datasets, providing dashboards, alerts, and machine learning integration for advanced analytics. This architecture combines reliability, scalability, and low operational overhead, making it the best choice for IoT anomaly detection pipelines.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is more suitable for batch processing. While Dataproc can process large amounts of data using Spark or Hadoop, it introduces latency because data must first be persisted to Cloud Storage. This approach cannot provide real-time anomaly detection or exactly-once processing without additional orchestration. Managing clusters, scaling, and failure recovery adds significant operational complexity.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery is not well-suited for high-throughput streaming data. Cloud SQL is optimized for transactional workloads and would quickly become a bottleneck. Cloud Functions are stateless, have execution time limits, and require complex logic to achieve exactly-once semantics and stateful windowed processing. This architecture would be challenging to scale and maintain for millions of IoT events per second.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery could store large volumes of sensor data efficiently due to Bigtable’s low-latency, high-throughput storage. However, Cloud Run is stateless and does not provide distributed stream processing or exactly-once guarantees. Implementing real-time anomaly detection logic and ensuring reliable delivery would require additional orchestration, increasing complexity and operational overhead.

Q47

A company wants to store large volumes of semi-structured JSON logs in BigQuery for analytics. Queries often filter by date and log type. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design provides optimal performance and cost efficiency?

A) Partition by ingestion date and cluster by log type

B) Partition by log type and cluster by ingestion date

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create multiple tables per log type

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion date and cluster by log type

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion date ensures queries filtering by date scan only the relevant partitions, reducing scanned bytes and query cost. Clustering by log type organizes similar logs together within each partition, improving query performance for filters or aggregations based on log type. This design scales to petabyte-level datasets and simplifies operational management, as only one table needs maintenance. Partitioned and clustered tables in BigQuery automatically manage metadata, partitions, and performance optimization, allowing low-latency analytics without manual intervention. Using this design, analysts can query recent logs for operational insights efficiently, while historical logs remain accessible for batch analysis or compliance purposes. It also supports the ingestion of streaming or batch data, making it highly flexible for evolving workloads.

B) Partitioning by log type is inefficient for datasets with many types of logs, as it creates numerous small partitions, increasing metadata overhead and reducing query performance. Clustering by ingestion date alone does not optimize queries filtering by log type, which is common in operational analytics.

C) A single unpartitioned table is not scalable for petabyte-level datasets. Queries filtering by date or log type would scan the entire table, leading to high costs and slow performance.

D) Creating multiple tables per log type increases operational overhead. Managing schema changes, cross-log type queries, and historical analysis becomes cumbersome, and unions or joins across multiple tables increase query complexity and cost.

Q48

A financial company needs a real-time analytics pipeline for fraud detection on streaming credit card transactions. The system must scale automatically, ensure exactly-once processing, and provide low-latency alerts. Which architecture is most appropriate?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub serves as the ingestion layer for high-volume streaming transactions, providing durable message storage and automatic scaling. Dataflow processes these events in real-time, supporting exactly-once semantics with stateful operations and checkpointing. Complex fraud detection logic, such as pattern matching, threshold checks, and anomaly scoring, can be implemented within Dataflow pipelines. BigQuery stores raw and aggregated results, enabling ad hoc analysis, dashboards, and reporting. This architecture provides a fully managed, serverless solution that scales seamlessly with traffic spikes, ensures reliable processing, and supports low-latency alerts for fraud detection. It also reduces operational overhead, as all components are managed by GCP, and integrates with monitoring and alerting tools for near real-time operational insights.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented. Processing transactions in batches introduces latency, making real-time fraud detection impossible. Exactly-once semantics are not inherent, and operational overhead for cluster management is high.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery cannot handle high-throughput streaming workloads. Cloud SQL is a transactional database that would become a bottleneck, while Cloud Functions have execution limits and stateless behavior, making exactly-once processing challenging.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery can store raw transaction data efficiently, but Cloud Run is stateless and lacks distributed stream processing capabilities. Implementing exactly-once semantics and real-time fraud detection would require additional orchestration, increasing operational complexity.

Q49

A company wants to analyze historical log data stored in Cloud Storage using SQL queries without managing infrastructure. The dataset is expected to grow to petabytes. Which service is most appropriate?

A) BigQuery

B) Cloud SQL

C) Dataproc with Hive

D) Cloud Bigtable

Answer

A) BigQuery

Explanation

A) BigQuery is a fully managed, serverless data warehouse that allows SQL-based queries on datasets stored in Cloud Storage without requiring infrastructure management. Using external tables or loading data into BigQuery, users can perform large-scale analytics efficiently. Its columnar storage and distributed query engine provide high performance for aggregations, joins, and filtering, even on petabyte-scale datasets. Partitioning and clustering reduce the number of scanned bytes, optimizing cost and query performance. BigQuery supports structured and semi-structured data such as JSON, Avro, and Parquet, and integrates with BI tools and machine learning frameworks for advanced analytics. Analysts can query historical logs with minimal latency, while GCP automatically handles scaling, replication, and resource management.

B) Cloud SQL is designed for transactional workloads, not petabyte-scale analytics. It cannot scale efficiently for large historical datasets, and infrastructure management would be required.

C) Dataproc with Hive can process large datasets but requires cluster management, manual scaling, and operational oversight. Queries are typically slower than BigQuery for ad hoc analytics, and maintaining clusters at petabyte-scale is complex.

D) Cloud Bigtable is optimized for key-value and time-series workloads, not SQL-based analytics. It does not natively support ad hoc queries, making it unsuitable for large-scale historical log analysis.

Q50

A team needs to build a multi-tenant SaaS analytics solution on BigQuery. Each tenant’s data must be isolated, but occasional cross-tenant analysis is required. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design is most appropriate?

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant

C) Store data in Cloud SQL and replicate to BigQuery

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant

Answer

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

Explanation

A) Using a single table with a tenant_id column and clustering by tenant_id provides scalability, performance, and ease of management for multi-tenant SaaS solutions. Clustering physically organizes rows by tenant, enabling efficient filtering and aggregation. Partitioning can also be applied based on ingestion date for time-based queries, further optimizing query performance. This approach supports petabyte-scale datasets without creating thousands of individual tables or projects. Cross-tenant queries are straightforward, requiring only a filter or GROUP BY on tenant_id, and schema evolution is centralized. BigQuery’s serverless architecture handles automatic scaling and query optimization, making it highly cost-effective and operationally simple for large-scale multi-tenant analytics.

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant introduces significant operational overhead, with individual billing, IAM configurations, and schema management. Cross-tenant queries are cumbersome and inefficient.

C) Storing data in Cloud SQL and replicating to BigQuery adds complexity and latency. Cloud SQL is not optimized for petabyte-scale analytics, and replication pipelines are operationally expensive to maintain.

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant increase operational complexity and complicate cross-tenant analysis. Managing thousands of tables becomes error-prone, and queries require unions, which reduce performance and increase costs.

Q51

A company wants to design a pipeline for real-time e-commerce transaction data. The system must handle high throughput, ensure exactly-once processing, perform windowed aggregations, and provide near real-time dashboards. Which architecture is most appropriate?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery form a highly integrated, fully managed, serverless architecture that is ideal for processing real-time e-commerce transactions. Cloud Pub/Sub acts as a message ingestion layer capable of handling millions of transactions per second, ensuring durability and horizontal scaling without manual intervention. It buffers bursts in traffic, preventing data loss during peak periods such as flash sales or promotions. Dataflow, built on Apache Beam, processes streaming data in real time and supports exactly-once processing through deduplication, checkpointing, and stateful transformations. This ensures that each transaction is processed exactly once, which is critical for accurate analytics and financial reporting. Dataflow also allows windowed aggregations, enabling computations like hourly revenue, top-selling products, and conversion rates for near real-time dashboards. BigQuery serves as the analytics layer, providing high-performance SQL queries on both raw and aggregated data. Its serverless, columnar architecture scales automatically to petabyte-level datasets, enabling ad hoc reporting, dashboards, and integration with BI tools. This architecture minimizes operational overhead while providing high reliability, scalability, and low-latency analytics, making it the optimal choice for real-time e-commerce analytics.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented and not suitable for real-time analytics. Events are first persisted in Cloud Storage, then processed in Dataproc clusters. This approach introduces latency, lacks exactly-once guarantees, and requires manual cluster scaling and monitoring. Burst traffic may overwhelm the system, and windowed aggregation logic becomes more complex to implement, reducing overall responsiveness for dashboards.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery is not designed for high-throughput streaming. Cloud SQL is optimized for transactional workloads and will become a bottleneck under millions of events per second. Cloud Functions are stateless with execution limits, making exactly-once processing and windowed aggregations challenging. Scaling this architecture requires additional orchestration, increasing operational complexity.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery could store raw transactional data efficiently due to Bigtable’s high-throughput and low-latency capabilities. However, Cloud Run is stateless and cannot perform distributed stream processing or provide exactly-once semantics. Windowed aggregations and low-latency dashboards would require additional orchestration, making this approach less practical than the Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery pipeline.

Q52

A company wants to analyze historical IoT sensor data stored in Cloud Storage. Queries frequently filter by timestamp and sensor type. The dataset is expected to reach petabytes. Which table design in BigQuery optimizes performance and cost efficiency?

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by sensor type

B) Partition by sensor type and cluster by timestamp

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create multiple tables per sensor type

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by sensor type

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion timestamp ensures queries filtering by date scan only relevant partitions, reducing scanned data and lowering query costs. Clustering by sensor type organizes data physically within partitions, improving performance for queries that filter or aggregate by sensor type. This approach is scalable to petabyte-level datasets, supports both streaming and batch ingestion, and simplifies schema management, as only one table needs to be maintained. BigQuery automatically manages partition maintenance, metadata, and scaling, allowing analysts to query large datasets with low latency. Additionally, this design supports advanced analytics such as anomaly detection, trend analysis, and predictive modeling. Using partitioning and clustering together provides a cost-effective, high-performance architecture for time-series IoT data, ensuring efficient data retrieval while minimizing scanned bytes and operational complexity.

B) Partitioning by sensor type is inefficient because large-scale IoT deployments often involve thousands or millions of sensors, creating numerous small partitions that increase metadata overhead and reduce performance. Clustering by timestamp alone does not optimize common query patterns that filter by sensor type.

C) A single unpartitioned table is not suitable for petabyte-scale datasets. Queries filtering by timestamp or sensor type would scan the entire table, resulting in higher costs and slower performance.

D) Creating multiple tables per sensor type increases operational complexity. Schema updates, cross-sensor analysis, and maintenance become cumbersome. Querying across sensors requires unions, reducing performance and increasing cost.

Q53

A company wants to implement a GDPR-compliant pipeline for sensitive customer data in BigQuery. The system must automatically detect PII, anonymize or mask it, and allow analytics on the transformed data. Which GCP service is best suited for this?

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

B) Cloud KMS

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)

D) Cloud Functions

Answer

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is specifically designed for detecting and managing sensitive data, such as personally identifiable information (PII). It provides pre-built detectors for common PII types, including names, emails, phone numbers, social security numbers, and financial data. DLP supports automated transformation techniques, including masking, tokenization, redaction, and format-preserving encryption, allowing analytics without exposing raw PII. It can process both structured and semi-structured data in BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub, and integrates seamlessly into pipelines for inline transformation of sensitive data during ingestion or query execution. Audit logging and reporting ensure compliance with GDPR, as organizations can track data transformations and access to sensitive information. Using Cloud DLP reduces operational complexity, ensures legal compliance, and allows teams to perform analytics safely on anonymized data.

B) Cloud KMS provides encryption and key management to protect data at rest, but it does not detect, classify, or anonymize sensitive information. Encryption alone does not allow analytics on transformed PII, making it unsuitable for GDPR-compliant processing.

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) secures application access and enforces authentication but does not provide PII detection, masking, or transformation capabilities.

D) Cloud Functions can implement custom PII detection and transformation logic but requires extensive development, testing, and maintenance. It lacks the built-in PII detectors and transformation techniques provided by DLP, making it less reliable and scalable for GDPR compliance.

Q54

A company wants to monitor BigQuery query costs and generate near real-time alerts for expensive queries. The solution must be serverless and scalable. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

B) Query BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually

C) Export logs to Cloud Storage and process offline

D) Store query metadata in Bigtable and poll for alerts

Answer

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

Explanation

A) BigQuery INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables provide detailed metadata about queries, including bytes processed, runtime, and job costs. By scheduling Cloud Functions to query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables at regular intervals, organizations can detect unusually expensive queries automatically. Cloud Functions can then send notifications via Pub/Sub, email, or other channels. This solution is serverless, scales automatically with query volume, and minimizes operational overhead. It enables near real-time monitoring, allowing cost anomalies to be identified and addressed quickly. Additionally, thresholds and rules can be customized for specific cost limits or query patterns, ensuring proactive cost management and operational visibility.

B) Querying BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually is not scalable. Cloud SQL is not optimized for large metadata analysis, and manual intervention delays alerts, making real-time monitoring impractical.

C) Exporting logs to Cloud Storage for offline analysis introduces latency and prevents near real-time alerting. Queries for expensive jobs would only be analyzed after processing, which limits operational responsiveness.

D) Storing query metadata in Bigtable and polling for alerts increases operational complexity. While Bigtable handles high-throughput writes, managing metadata ingestion, polling, and alerting adds unnecessary overhead compared to serverless Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub.

Q55

A company wants to implement a multi-tenant SaaS analytics solution on BigQuery. Each tenant’s data must be isolated, but occasional cross-tenant analysis is required. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design is most appropriate?

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant

C) Store data in Cloud SQL and replicate to BigQuery

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant

Answer

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

Explanation

A) Using a single table with a tenant_id column and clustering by tenant_id provides optimal performance, scalability, and operational simplicity for multi-tenant SaaS analytics. Clustering physically organizes rows by tenant, improving filtering and aggregation efficiency. Partitioning can also be applied based on ingestion time, optimizing queries that filter by date. This design supports petabyte-scale datasets without the overhead of managing thousands of tables or projects. Cross-tenant queries are straightforward, requiring only filtering or grouping on tenant_id. Schema evolution is centralized, and BigQuery’s serverless architecture automatically manages scaling, metadata, and query optimization. This approach reduces operational complexity, improves query performance, and minimizes cost compared to managing multiple tables or projects.

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant introduces significant operational overhead with individual billing, IAM configurations, and schema management. Cross-tenant queries are cumbersome and inefficient.

C) Storing data in Cloud SQL and replicating to BigQuery adds complexity, latency, and operational overhead. Cloud SQL is not suitable for petabyte-scale analytics.

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant increase operational complexity. Cross-tenant queries require unions, and maintaining thousands of tables is error-prone and difficult to manage.

Q56

A company wants to build a real-time analytics pipeline for streaming clickstream data from its e-commerce platform. The system must handle millions of events per second, guarantee exactly-once processing, perform windowed aggregations, and provide low-latency dashboards. Which architecture is most suitable?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery together form a highly scalable, fully managed, serverless architecture tailored for real-time streaming analytics. Cloud Pub/Sub ingests high-throughput clickstream events, ensuring durability and horizontal scaling. It buffers traffic spikes automatically, preventing data loss during peak periods such as flash sales or marketing campaigns. Dataflow processes streaming events in real-time using Apache Beam, offering exactly-once processing through deduplication, checkpointing, and stateful operations. This ensures every click event is processed precisely once, which is critical for accurate metrics such as session counts, conversion rates, and active user tracking. Dataflow also supports windowed aggregations, enabling analytics like hourly or daily active users, top pages, and funnel analysis for dashboards. BigQuery serves as the analytics layer, providing high-performance SQL queries on both raw and aggregated data. Its columnar storage and serverless architecture enable ad hoc queries, low-latency dashboards, and scalable analytics for petabyte-level datasets. This architecture minimizes operational overhead while providing reliability, scalability, and real-time insights, making it the ideal choice for e-commerce clickstream analytics.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented. While Dataproc can process large volumes of data, events must first be persisted in Cloud Storage, introducing latency that prevents near real-time dashboards. Exactly-once semantics are not guaranteed, and cluster management adds operational overhead. Burst traffic can overwhelm the system, delaying insights.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery is unsuitable for high-throughput streaming. Cloud SQL is designed for transactional workloads and becomes a bottleneck under millions of events per second. Cloud Functions are stateless and have execution time limits, making exactly-once processing and windowed aggregation difficult. Scaling requires additional orchestration, increasing complexity and operational overhead.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery can store raw clickstream events efficiently due to Bigtable’s high throughput. However, Cloud Run is stateless and cannot provide distributed stream processing or exactly-once semantics. Windowed aggregations and real-time dashboards would require additional orchestration, making this solution less practical compared to Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery.

Q57

A company wants to analyze historical IoT sensor data stored in Cloud Storage. Queries often filter by timestamp and device type, and the dataset will grow to petabytes. Which BigQuery table design is most appropriate?

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type

B) Partition by device type and cluster by timestamp

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create multiple tables per device type

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion timestamp enables BigQuery to scan only the relevant partitions for time-based queries, reducing scanned data and cost. Clustering by device type organizes data physically within partitions, optimizing queries that filter or aggregate by device type. This design supports petabyte-scale datasets, allows streaming or batch ingestion, and simplifies operational management since only one table needs maintenance. Partitioned and clustered tables also enable low-latency analytics, supporting anomaly detection, trend analysis, and predictive modeling for IoT devices. BigQuery handles scaling, metadata management, and query optimization automatically, providing a cost-efficient and high-performance solution for time-series IoT data.

B) Partitioning by device type is inefficient because large-scale IoT deployments may have millions of device types, creating numerous small partitions. Clustering by timestamp alone does not optimize common queries filtering by device type.

C) A single unpartitioned table is not scalable for petabyte-level datasets. Queries filtering by timestamp or device type would scan the entire table, leading to higher costs and slower performance.

D) Multiple tables per device type increase operational complexity. Schema updates, cross-device queries, and maintenance become cumbersome, and union operations across tables add query complexity and reduce performance.

Q58

A company wants to implement a GDPR-compliant analytics pipeline in BigQuery. Sensitive customer data must be detected, anonymized, or masked, and analytics should operate on the transformed data. Which GCP service is best suited?

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

B) Cloud KMS

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)

D) Cloud Functions

Answer

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is designed to manage sensitive data, including PII, to ensure GDPR compliance. DLP can automatically detect PII in BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub using built-in detectors for names, emails, phone numbers, credit card numbers, and other sensitive fields. It provides transformation capabilities such as masking, tokenization, redaction, and format-preserving encryption, enabling analytics on anonymized data without exposing raw PII. DLP supports structured and semi-structured datasets, integrates seamlessly with BigQuery, and allows inline data transformation during ingestion or queries. Audit logging ensures that data transformations are recorded for compliance reporting. Using DLP reduces operational complexity, ensures legal compliance, and allows analysts to perform analytics safely on sensitive datasets.

B) Cloud KMS provides encryption key management and secures data at rest but does not detect or transform PII. Encryption alone does not allow GDPR-compliant analytics on transformed data.

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP) secures access to applications but does not provide PII detection, masking, or anonymization for datasets.

D) Cloud Functions can implement custom detection and transformation logic but require extensive development, testing, and maintenance. Functions lack built-in PII detection and transformation capabilities, making them less reliable for GDPR compliance compared to Cloud DLP.

Q59

A company wants to monitor BigQuery query costs and send near real-time alerts for expensive queries. The solution must be serverless and scalable. Which approach is most appropriate?

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

B) Query BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually

C) Export logs to Cloud Storage and process offline

D) Store query metadata in Bigtable and poll for alerts

Answer

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

Explanation

A) BigQuery INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables provide metadata on queries, including runtime, bytes processed, and job costs. By scheduling Cloud Functions to query these tables, expensive queries can be detected automatically. Alerts can be sent through Pub/Sub, email, or other notification channels. This solution is fully serverless, scales automatically with query volume, and requires minimal operational overhead. It supports near real-time detection of anomalous query costs, allowing teams to take immediate action. Thresholds and monitoring rules can be configured to target queries that exceed expected resource usage, enabling cost optimization and operational visibility without manual intervention.

B) Querying BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually is not scalable. Cloud SQL is not optimized for storing or analyzing query metadata at large scale, and alerts would be delayed due to manual processing.

C) Exporting logs to Cloud Storage and processing offline introduces latency, preventing near real-time alerting.

D) Storing query metadata in Bigtable and polling for alerts increases operational complexity. While Bigtable supports high-throughput writes, managing ingestion, polling, and alerts adds overhead compared to serverless Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub.

Q60

A company wants to implement a multi-tenant SaaS analytics solution on BigQuery. Each tenant’s data must be isolated, but occasional cross-tenant analysis is required. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design is most appropriate?

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant

C) Store data in Cloud SQL and replicate to BigQuery

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant

Answer

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

Explanation

A) Using a single table with a tenant_id column and clustering by tenant_id provides optimal performance, scalability, and operational simplicity for multi-tenant SaaS analytics. Clustering organizes rows by tenant, improving query performance when filtering or aggregating by tenant. Partitioning can also be applied based on ingestion time, optimizing time-based queries. This approach supports petabyte-scale datasets without the complexity of managing thousands of separate tables or projects. Cross-tenant queries are simple and efficient, requiring only a filter or GROUP BY on tenant_id. Schema evolution is centralized, and BigQuery’s serverless architecture handles scaling, metadata management, and query optimization automatically. This reduces operational overhead while ensuring high performance and cost efficiency.

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant introduces high operational complexity, including individual billing, IAM management, and schema updates. Cross-tenant queries are cumbersome and inefficient.

C) Storing data in Cloud SQL and replicating to BigQuery increases operational complexity, introduces latency, and is not suitable for petabyte-scale analytics.

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant add significant operational overhead. Managing thousands of tables, updating schemas, and performing cross-tenant queries through unions is error-prone and inefficient.