Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4  FCSS – SD-WAN 7.4 Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 3 Q 41- 60

Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 41

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to ensure that ERP traffic always uses the most reliable link while general web traffic is routed over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be used?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define performance thresholds for applications, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance in real time and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Less critical traffic, such as general web browsing, can be sent over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE, optimizing WAN cost and utilization. By automating path selection, SD-WAN ensures that critical business applications receive optimal performance while non-critical traffic is efficiently managed. This approach reduces manual intervention, maintains SLA compliance, and maximizes resource usage.

B) Static routing uses predefined paths for traffic and does not adjust to link performance. ERP traffic may continue to traverse degraded links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Static routing lacks the flexibility needed for dynamic traffic optimization.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily impact ERP performance before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic uniformly across all available links without considering link quality or application requirements. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic could traverse degraded or high-packet-loss links, causing performance issues and SLA violations. Equal load balancing is not application-aware and cannot provide automated optimization.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical applications are always routed over optimal paths while less critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated mechanism maintains SLA compliance, improves WAN efficiency, reduces operational effort, and enhances user experience. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 42

A company wants to maintain high-quality VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while sending less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. During periods of congestion or link degradation, VoIP traffic is automatically rerouted to the link that meets SLA thresholds, ensuring uninterrupted call quality. Less critical traffic remains on backup or lower-cost links, optimizing bandwidth and reducing costs. Automation reduces manual intervention, maintains SLA compliance, and ensures that critical traffic consistently uses the best-performing paths. Application-aware routing ensures VoIP traffic maintains high quality even during dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing assigns fixed paths for traffic regardless of WAN link performance. VoIP may traverse a congested or degraded link, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot adapt to real-time conditions and does not provide SLA guarantees.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays and may temporarily disrupt VoIP service. Human errors or slow detection can cause performance issues for latency-sensitive applications.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across links without considering application priority or link quality. VoIP traffic may traverse a degraded or high-latency link, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing does not provide automated SLA enforcement or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it proactively monitors network performance and automatically reroutes critical traffic over the best-performing links. Non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This approach guarantees SLA compliance, reduces operational effort, maximizes WAN efficiency, and ensures uninterrupted VoIP performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic optimization.

Question 43

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping less critical traffic on the broadband link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be used?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the broadband link degrades and fails to meet SLA requirements for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Less critical traffic continues using the degraded broadband link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, maintains high performance for critical applications, and minimizes administrative overhead. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN guarantees reliable performance for mission-critical traffic while efficiently using available resources.

B) Static routing assigns traffic to predetermined paths without considering real-time link performance. ERP traffic may continue to traverse the degraded broadband link, causing performance degradation and potential SLA violations. Static routing cannot dynamically adapt to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily affect ERP performance before corrective action is taken.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without regard to link quality or application priority. ERP traffic could traverse the degraded link, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-awareness.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it provides proactive, intelligent traffic management. Critical ERP traffic is routed over optimal links, while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, improves WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and provides consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve this level of dynamic optimization.

Question 44

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over lower-cost links to reduce WAN expenses. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define performance thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN links and routes video traffic over the link that meets SLA thresholds. Non-critical traffic, such as file transfers or general browsing, is routed over lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted high-quality video communication while optimizing WAN cost and bandwidth utilization. Application-aware routing reduces operational effort, maintains SLA compliance, and provides consistent performance for critical applications.

B) Static routing uses predetermined paths for traffic and does not adjust to link performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot dynamically ensure SLA compliance.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the chance of errors, and may disrupt video conferencing during network performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or performance. Video traffic may traverse suboptimal or congested links, leading to performance degradation. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA enforcement, application awareness, or real-time traffic optimization.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic utilizes secondary or lower-cost links. This approach maximizes WAN efficiency, maintains SLA compliance, reduces operational effort, and ensures uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 45

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss, while allowing less critical traffic to remain on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature provides this capability?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. SD-WAN monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the primary link experiences packet loss beyond defined SLA thresholds, critical ERP traffic is automatically rerouted to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Less critical traffic continues to use the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for critical applications. This proactive approach ensures mission-critical traffic always receives the best possible routing while non-critical traffic uses available resources efficiently.

B) Static routing assigns fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time link conditions. ERP traffic may remain on the degraded link, leading to SLA violations and performance degradation. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt critical applications before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering performance or application priority. ERP traffic may traverse the degraded link, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application awareness.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while less critical traffic uses secondary or lower-quality links. This intelligent, automated approach guarantees SLA compliance, maintains performance, optimizes WAN utilization, and reduces administrative effort. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide this level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 46

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending general web traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for each application based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors all WAN links and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Less critical traffic, such as web browsing, can be sent over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE, optimizing WAN utilization and reducing operational expenses. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures critical business applications always maintain optimal performance. This approach minimizes manual intervention, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures that non-critical traffic does not interfere with mission-critical applications.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN link conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in poor performance and potential SLA violations. Static routing lacks the flexibility and dynamic response required for modern SD-WAN environments.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach is time-consuming, prone to human error, and may temporarily disrupt critical ERP traffic before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic uniformly across all WAN links without regard to application requirements or link performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse high-latency or degraded links, causing poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not provide application awareness, automation, or proactive traffic optimization.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP applications always use the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and provides a consistent user experience. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot deliver this level of intelligent, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 47

A company wants to maintain high-quality VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while sending non-critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. During congestion or link degradation, VoIP traffic is automatically rerouted over the link that meets SLA requirements, ensuring uninterrupted call quality. Non-critical traffic remains on backup or lower-cost links, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing WAN costs. Automation reduces manual intervention, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees that latency-sensitive traffic consistently uses the best-performing paths. Application-aware routing ensures VoIP quality is maintained even during dynamic network conditions, which is critical for business communications.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths for traffic regardless of link performance. VoIP traffic may traverse a congested or degraded link, causing poor call quality, jitter, and packet loss. Static routing cannot adapt to real-time network conditions and does not provide SLA guarantees for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the chance of errors, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. VoIP traffic may traverse a congested or poor-quality link, resulting in degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it proactively monitors network performance and dynamically reroutes critical traffic over optimal links while directing non-critical traffic to secondary links. This ensures uninterrupted VoIP performance, maintains SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, and reduces administrative effort. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, automated traffic optimization.

Question 48

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically reroute ERP traffic to MPLS while allowing less critical traffic to remain on the broadband link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the primary broadband link experiences degradation beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Less critical traffic continues using the degraded broadband link, optimizing bandwidth and cost efficiency. This intelligent and automated approach guarantees SLA compliance, maintains application performance, reduces manual intervention, and ensures mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic without adapting to changing WAN link conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in performance issues and SLA violations. Static routing lacks flexibility and cannot provide dynamic optimization for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the chance of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Critical ERP traffic could traverse the degraded link, causing poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while less critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, intelligent approach maximizes WAN efficiency, ensures SLA compliance, reduces operational effort, and provides consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve this level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 49

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links to reduce WAN expenses. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and routes video traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic such as file transfers or general browsing is routed over lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted high-quality video communication while optimizing WAN cost and bandwidth utilization. Application-aware routing reduces operational complexity, maintains SLA compliance, and ensures critical applications always receive the best performance.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic regardless of link performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot dynamically enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may disrupt video conferencing performance during transient WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering link performance or application priority. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse suboptimal or congested links, leading to performance degradation. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA enforcement, automation, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses the optimal paths while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or lower-cost links. This approach maximizes WAN efficiency, maintains SLA compliance, reduces administrative overhead, and ensures uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 50

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link experiences degradation beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic over the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth and reducing costs. Automation and application-aware routing ensure SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain reliable performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach guarantees critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary links efficiently.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths that do not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance degradation. Static routing is inflexible and cannot dynamically optimize traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is taken.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic could traverse degraded links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees critical ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues on secondary or lower-quality links. This automated, intelligent approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide this level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 51

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while general web traffic uses lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications like ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Less critical traffic, such as web browsing or file downloads, can be routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE. By automating path selection and prioritizing applications, SD-WAN ensures that mission-critical traffic receives optimal performance while optimizing WAN utilization and costs. This approach reduces administrative intervention, maintains SLA compliance, and ensures consistent user experience.

B) Static routing assigns fixed paths for traffic regardless of link quality or performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or high-latency links, resulting in poor performance and potential SLA violations. Static routing lacks dynamic adaptability and cannot provide application-aware routing for critical traffic.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily impact ERP performance before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering link performance or application requirements. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware prioritization.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN usage, reduces administrative workload, and provides a consistent user experience. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve this level of intelligent, real-time traffic management.

Question 52

A company wants to maintain high-quality VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades, VoIP traffic is automatically rerouted to the link that meets SLA thresholds, ensuring uninterrupted call quality. Non-critical traffic is sent over backup or lower-cost links, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational expenses. Automation minimizes manual intervention, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures critical, latency-sensitive traffic always uses the best-performing paths. Application-aware routing ensures consistent voice quality even in dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing assigns fixed paths for traffic regardless of link performance. VoIP may traverse a congested or degraded link, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot adapt dynamically to maintain performance or SLA compliance for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP service during WAN degradation.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. VoIP traffic may traverse a degraded or congested link, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it provides proactive monitoring, automated rerouting, and intelligent application prioritization. Critical VoIP traffic is always sent over the optimal link while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths. This approach ensures uninterrupted performance, maintains SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, and reduces administrative effort. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide this level of dynamic, intelligent traffic management.

Question 53

A branch office experiences high jitter on its broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link performance metrics including jitter, latency, and packet loss in real time. When the broadband link does not meet SLA requirements for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Less critical traffic remains on broadband, optimizing bandwidth and cost efficiency. Automation guarantees SLA compliance, maintains application performance, reduces administrative effort, and ensures mission-critical applications are prioritized. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN provides reliable and optimized performance for critical applications while utilizing available network resources efficiently.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths regardless of WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing the jittery broadband link, causing performance degradation and SLA violations. Static routing is inflexible and cannot dynamically optimize traffic based on real-time conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily impact ERP performance before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse the degraded broadband link, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-awareness.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it combines real-time monitoring, automated traffic rerouting, and intelligent application prioritization. Critical ERP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative workload, and provides consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide this level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 54

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links to reduce WAN expenses. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN links and routes video traffic over links that meet SLA thresholds. Non-critical traffic such as general browsing or file transfers is routed over lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted high-quality video communication while optimizing WAN cost and bandwidth utilization. Application-aware routing reduces operational complexity, maintains SLA compliance, and ensures that critical applications always receive optimal performance.

B) Static routing uses predetermined paths for traffic and does not adjust to real-time link performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot dynamically enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may disrupt video conferencing during WAN performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application performance or priority. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse suboptimal or congested links, leading to performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, real-time monitoring, and automation.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This approach maximizes WAN efficiency, maintains SLA compliance, reduces administrative overhead, and ensures uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 55

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while allowing non-critical traffic to remain on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the primary link experiences degradation beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth and reducing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths that do not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance degradation. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees critical ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues on secondary or lower-quality links. This intelligent, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide this level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 56

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending general web traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications like ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as general web browsing, is sent over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational expenses. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures critical traffic receives optimal performance while efficiently utilizing all available links. This reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures consistent user experience.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic regardless of WAN link performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Static routing lacks the flexibility and dynamic adaptability required for modern SD-WAN deployments.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method is time-consuming, prone to human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering link performance or application requirements. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse suboptimal links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware prioritization.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN usage, reduces administrative workload, and provides a consistent user experience. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve this level of intelligent, real-time traffic management.

Question 57

A company wants to maintain high-quality VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while sending less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. During congestion or link degradation, VoIP traffic is automatically rerouted to the link that meets SLA thresholds, ensuring uninterrupted call quality. Less critical traffic remains on backup or lower-cost links, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing operational costs. Automation reduces manual intervention, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures latency-sensitive traffic always uses the best-performing paths. Application-aware routing ensures consistent voice quality, which is essential for business communications, even in dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing assigns fixed paths for traffic regardless of link performance. VoIP may traverse congested or degraded links, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot dynamically maintain SLA compliance or optimize traffic for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the chance of errors, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP services before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. VoIP traffic may traverse suboptimal or degraded links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures proactive monitoring, automated rerouting, and intelligent application prioritization. Critical VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links, while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths. This approach guarantees uninterrupted performance, maintains SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, and reduces administrative effort. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, intelligent traffic management.

Question 58

A branch office experiences high jitter on its broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link performance in real time, including jitter, latency, and packet loss. When the broadband link cannot meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Less critical traffic continues using the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation ensures SLA compliance, maintains application performance, reduces administrative effort, and prioritizes mission-critical traffic. Combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring allows SD-WAN to provide consistent and reliable performance for critical applications while efficiently utilizing available network resources.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths for traffic, regardless of WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue using the jittery broadband link, causing performance issues and SLA violations. Static routing is inflexible and cannot dynamically optimize traffic based on real-time conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the chance of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP performance before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it combines real-time monitoring, intelligent application prioritization, and automated traffic rerouting. Critical ERP traffic is always routed over optimal links, while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and provides consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot deliver this level of dynamic, application-aware optimization.

Question 59

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links to reduce WAN expenses. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic such as general web browsing or file transfers is routed over lower-cost links to optimize WAN usage. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while minimizing WAN costs. Application-aware routing reduces operational complexity, maintains SLA compliance, and ensures critical applications always receive optimal performance.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths and does not adjust to real-time link performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot dynamically enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical traffic.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt video conferencing during network issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application performance or priority. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse suboptimal or congested links, leading to performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This ensures maximum WAN efficiency, maintains SLA compliance, reduces administrative workload, and provides uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 60

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the primary link experiences degradation beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain reliable performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance degradation. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated approach guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide this level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.