Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4  FCSS – SD-WAN 7.4 Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q 121- 140

Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 121

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing, email, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. The combination of real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization ensures mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains a consistent user experience even in fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization, making it unsuitable for mission-critical application management.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This approach is reactive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. Manual switching cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions and does not guarantee SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links with high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, causing SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for critical traffic management.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 122

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link capable of maintaining high-quality performance. Non-critical traffic, such as email, file transfers, and web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource usage.

B) Static routing uses predetermined paths and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automated SLA monitoring and dynamic rerouting, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover depends on administrators detecting WAN degradation and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing poor call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for mission-critical voice traffic.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary links efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communication, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 123

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN maintains reliable performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and potential user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization and cannot respond proactively to network performance issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, packet loss, and reduced application performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, SLA enforcement, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 124

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing or file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even in fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing does not provide SLA enforcement or application-aware routing.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error risk, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for mission-critical video traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, optimizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 125

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, reduced performance, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA monitoring, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical ERP traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error potential, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and reduced performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 126

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, including metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors the performance of all WAN links and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, like email, web browsing, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links such as broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains consistent user experience even during fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, slow application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing does not offer dynamic optimization or intelligent path selection, making it inadequate for mission-critical traffic management.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. Manual switching does not proactively respond to changing network conditions and cannot guarantee SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, causing SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing, making it insufficient for critical application traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 127

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality performance. Non-critical traffic, including email, file transfers, and general web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces administrative effort, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing uses predetermined paths and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automated SLA monitoring and dynamic rerouting, making it unsuitable for mission-critical voice traffic.

C) Manual failover depends on administrators detecting WAN degradation and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing reduced call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary links efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communication, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 128

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic. Combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring allows SD-WAN to maintain reliable performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization and cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, packet loss, and reduced performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 129

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing does not provide SLA enforcement or application-aware routing.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical video applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 130

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance issues. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical ERP traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 131

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications, such as ERP, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, like email, web browsing, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links such as broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Application-aware SLA routing combines real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, ensuring that mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains a consistent user experience even in fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, slow application performance, and potential user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization, making it unsuitable for mission-critical application management.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. Manual switching does not proactively respond to changing network conditions and cannot guarantee SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, leading to SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical application traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 132

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link experiences degradation or fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality performance. Non-critical traffic, such as email, file transfers, and general web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing uses predetermined paths and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automated SLA monitoring and dynamic rerouting, making it unsuitable for mission-critical voice traffic.

C) Manual failover depends on administrators detecting WAN degradation and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing reduced call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 133

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics, including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN maintains reliable performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization and cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, packet loss, and reduced application performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 134

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing or file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing does not provide SLA enforcement or application-aware routing.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical video applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 135

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical ERP traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 136

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, including metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links such as broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. Application-aware SLA routing combines real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, ensuring that mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains consistent user experience even during fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, slow application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and intelligent path selection, making it unsuitable for mission-critical traffic management.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. Manual switching does not proactively respond to changing network conditions and cannot guarantee SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, leading to SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical application traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 137

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality performance. Non-critical traffic, including email, file transfers, and general web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing uses predetermined paths and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automated SLA monitoring and dynamic rerouting, making it unsuitable for mission-critical voice traffic.

C) Manual failover depends on administrators detecting WAN degradation and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing reduced call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 138

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN maintains reliable performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization and cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, packet loss, and reduced application performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 139

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing does not provide SLA enforcement or application-aware routing.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error potential, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical video applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 140

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical ERP traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.