Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4  FCSS – SD-WAN 7.4 Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q 161- 180

Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 161

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, including metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Application-aware SLA routing combines automated path selection, real-time monitoring, and application prioritization to ensure mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures a consistent user experience even under fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and does not adapt to WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, slow performance, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization, real-time monitoring, and automation, making it unsuitable for critical application traffic.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and manually reroute traffic. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and can temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is implemented. Manual switching does not proactively respond to changing network conditions and does not guarantee SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links with high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, resulting in SLA violations and degraded application performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA monitoring, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for mission-critical traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 162

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality service. Non-critical traffic, including email, web browsing, and file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to dynamic WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical voice traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is implemented.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 163

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link does not meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic. By combining real-time monitoring with application-aware routing, SD-WAN ensures ERP and other critical applications maintain reliable performance while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are implemented.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations, packet loss, and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for mission-critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 164

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing or file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive traffic.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 165

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 166

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, including metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including email, web browsing, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Application-aware SLA routing integrates automated path selection, real-time monitoring, and application prioritization, ensuring mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures a consistent user experience even during fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, slow performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization, real-time monitoring, and automation, making it unsuitable for critical application traffic.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and can temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied. Manual switching cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions and does not guarantee SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links with high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, resulting in SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 167

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality service. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, and file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths and cannot respond to WAN degradation. VoIP traffic may continue using a degraded or congested link, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical voice traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, leading to poor call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or provide application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive traffic.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 168

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic. By combining real-time monitoring with application-aware routing, SD-WAN ensures ERP and other critical applications maintain reliable performance while efficiently utilizing available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not respond to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations, packet loss, and degraded performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 169

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 170

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 171

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications like ERP, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Application-aware SLA routing integrates automated path selection, real-time monitoring, and application prioritization, ensuring mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures a consistent user experience even during fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and does not adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, slow performance, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization, real-time monitoring, and automation, making it unsuitable for critical application traffic.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied. Manual switching does not proactively respond to changing network conditions and cannot ensure SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links with high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, resulting in SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 172

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality service. Non-critical traffic, including email, web browsing, and file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot respond to WAN degradation. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical voice traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or provide application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 173

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic. By combining real-time monitoring with application-aware routing, SD-WAN ensures ERP and other critical applications maintain reliable performance while efficiently utilizing available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations, packet loss, and degraded performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

 

Question 174

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 175

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 176

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, including metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including email, web browsing, and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. Application-aware SLA routing combines automated path selection, real-time monitoring, and application prioritization, ensuring mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures a consistent user experience even during fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and potential business disruption. Static routing lacks dynamic path optimization, real-time monitoring, and automation, making it unsuitable for critical application traffic.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied. Manual switching cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions and does not guarantee SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links with high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, resulting in SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for mission-critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 177

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality service. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, and file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical voice traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 178

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications are prioritized over non-critical traffic. By combining real-time monitoring with application-aware routing, SD-WAN ensures ERP and other critical applications maintain reliable performance while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not respond to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and business disruption. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations, packet loss, and performance degradation. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for mission-critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 179

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 180

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and business disruption. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.