Microsoft MS-102 365 Administrator Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 3 Q41-60

Visit here for our full Microsoft MS-102 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 41:

Your organization wants to enable Microsoft 365 multi-factor authentication (MFA) but only for users who are performing high-risk sign-ins or accessing sensitive data. You also want administrators to receive alerts for risky sign-in events. Which solution should you implement?

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with risk-based policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention labels
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with risk-based policies

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce access controls based on user risk, device compliance, location, and application sensitivity. By combining Conditional Access with Azure AD Identity Protection, administrators can create risk-based policies that require MFA only for high-risk sign-ins or access attempts to sensitive data.

Option A is correct because risk-based Conditional Access evaluates sign-in signals in real-time, such as unfamiliar locations, anonymous IP addresses, leaked credentials, or atypical behavior. When a risk is detected, the policy can enforce MFA, block access, or require additional verification. Administrators receive alerts and can monitor risk events using Azure AD dashboards, allowing rapid investigation and remediation. This approach implements a zero-trust security model, protecting high-value resources without imposing MFA on all users indiscriminately.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies ensure device security, such as encryption, OS updates, or PINs, but cannot evaluate user sign-in risk or enforce risk-based MFA.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle and classification, not access controls or MFA enforcement.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow and content but do not enforce authentication or MFA.

By implementing Conditional Access with risk-based policies, organizations achieve a balance between security and user experience. MFA is only required when a sign-in poses a potential threat, reducing friction for low-risk users while ensuring sensitive accounts or data are protected. Administrators can tune risk thresholds, configure notifications, and integrate alerts with SIEM solutions for comprehensive monitoring. The solution also supports compliance requirements by documenting access policies and enforcement actions, providing audit trails for regulatory purposes. Real-time evaluation ensures that high-risk activities are mitigated immediately, reducing the likelihood of compromised accounts and exposure of sensitive data. Security teams gain visibility into risk trends, enabling proactive policy adjustments and continuous improvement in identity security posture. This approach provides robust protection for Microsoft 365 resources while maintaining operational efficiency and end-user productivity.

Question 42:

Your organization wants to migrate all on-premises Exchange public folders to Microsoft 365 while preserving folder permissions, mail flow, and item metadata. Which solution provides the most efficient migration approach?

A)Hybrid Exchange migration with public folder migration tool
B)Cutover migration
C)IMAP migration
D)Manual export and import via PST

Answer:

A)Hybrid Exchange migration with public folder migration tool

Explanation:

Migrating Exchange public folders to Microsoft 365 requires careful planning to ensure that permissions, mail flow, and metadata are preserved. Hybrid Exchange migration combined with the Microsoft Exchange public folder migration tool provides a reliable, staged, and controlled migration path.

Option A is correct because hybrid migration integrates on-premises Exchange with Exchange Online, maintaining coexistence while allowing public folders to be migrated gradually. The public folder migration tool maps folder hierarchy, permissions, and mail-enabled folders to their cloud equivalents. Administrators can plan staged migrations, ensuring minimal downtime and maintaining consistent mail flow. This approach also supports incremental migration, which captures updates made during the migration process, ensuring that end users experience a seamless transition. Detailed reporting and error logs allow IT teams to address issues promptly, minimizing the risk of data loss or permission inconsistencies.

Option B is incorrect because cutover migration moves all mailboxes and folders at once. It is unsuitable for organizations with large public folder structures or coexistence requirements.

Option C is incorrect because IMAP migration only migrates emails without preserving public folder permissions, hierarchy, or metadata, making it unsuitable for comprehensive public folder migration.

Option D is incorrect because manual export/import via PST is time-consuming, error-prone, and cannot retain metadata or folder permissions efficiently.

Hybrid migration with the public folder migration tool ensures organizational continuity and minimal disruption. Administrators can maintain coexistence between on-premises and cloud environments while migrating content incrementally. The tool supports pre-migration scanning to identify potential issues such as invalid permissions, folder size limits, or unsupported items. Post-migration verification ensures that folder access, mail flow, and item integrity are maintained. By preserving permissions and metadata, end users continue accessing the same folders with the same access rights. Administrators can also monitor migration progress, generate reports for compliance, and address exceptions proactively. This structured approach reduces operational risk, provides detailed auditing capabilities, and supports regulatory compliance by maintaining consistent data governance during migration.

Question 43:

Your organization wants to ensure that sensitive Microsoft 365 documents are automatically encrypted when shared with external users. You also need the solution to apply consistent labeling and provide reporting for compliance audits. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption
B)Azure AD Conditional Access
C)Intune compliance policies
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to classify, label, and protect sensitive content across Microsoft 365 workloads. Sensitivity labels can be configured to automatically apply encryption, access restrictions, and sharing controls when content is shared externally.

Option A is correct because MIP sensitivity labels can be auto-applied based on content inspection, such as detecting personally identifiable information (PII), financial data, or intellectual property. Labels enforce encryption and restrict access to authorized users, ensuring that sensitive documents remain secure when shared externally. Administrators can generate compliance reports showing which documents were labeled, who accessed them, and any sharing events. Auto-labeling reduces reliance on user discretion, minimizing accidental exposure. Integration with Microsoft Purview reporting, auditing, and Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policies provides a comprehensive compliance framework for monitoring and protecting sensitive data.

Option B is incorrect because Azure AD Conditional Access enforces authentication and device access conditions, but does not apply content-level protection or encryption.

Option C is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device security settings but cannot inspect or encrypt sensitive content.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow and content filtering but cannot enforce encryption or labeling across multiple workloads.

By using MIP with sensitivity labels, organizations implement consistent protection policies for sensitive content. Administrators can define policies based on document content, classification, user role, or sharing context. Automatic application of labels ensures that sensitive data is protected consistently without user intervention. Encryption ensures that only authorized recipients can access content, while audit logs provide visibility into access, sharing, and policy compliance. The solution supports regulatory compliance requirements, including GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001. Additionally, labels can integrate with DLP policies to prevent unauthorized sharing, track policy violations, and notify users with policy tips, reinforcing security awareness. By combining content protection, automatic labeling, and reporting, organizations maintain robust data governance while enabling secure collaboration both internally and externally.

Question 44:

Your organization wants to enforce device-based restrictions for accessing Microsoft 365 resources, ensuring that only compliant devices can access email and SharePoint. You also want to report on device compliance status. Which solution should you implement?

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access
B)Microsoft Purview retention policies
C)Exchange Online transport rules
D)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Answer:

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Microsoft Intune provides device compliance policies to enforce security configurations, such as device encryption, PIN requirements, OS version, and threat protection status. When integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access, organizations can restrict access to Microsoft 365 resources based on device compliance status.

Option A is correct because administrators can create Intune compliance policies to define security standards for devices, and Conditional Access evaluates compliance before granting access to Microsoft 365 applications like Exchange Online, SharePoint, and Teams. Non-compliant devices can be blocked or required to remediate issues before access is allowed. Reports provide insights into compliance status, enabling IT teams to monitor device security, identify risks, and enforce remediation. This integration aligns with zero-trust security principles, ensuring that access is granted based on both user identity and device health.

Option B is incorrect because Purview retention policies manage document lifecycle and do not enforce device-based access restrictions.

Option C is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow and content filtering, not device compliance or access control.

Option D is incorrect because DLP policies protect sensitive content but do not evaluate or enforce device compliance.

Implementing Intune compliance policies with Conditional Access ensures that Microsoft 365 resources are accessed only by trusted devices, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and data leakage. Administrators can configure multiple compliance checks, including encryption, firewall status, antivirus, and OS version. Conditional Access policies can also enforce MFA for non-compliant devices or block access entirely until remediation occurs. Reporting dashboards provide real-time visibility into compliance trends, device health, and policy adherence. This combination provides a comprehensive security model that protects sensitive resources, supports regulatory compliance, and maintains operational efficiency by ensuring only secure endpoints access corporate data.

Question 45:

Your organization wants to monitor and analyze sign-in activity for all Microsoft 365 users, detecting suspicious logins such as impossible travel, unfamiliar locations, or risky devices. You also want automated alerts and recommendations for remediation. Which solution should you deploy?

A)Azure AD Identity Protection
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention policies
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection is a cloud-based identity security solution that monitors Microsoft 365 sign-in activity in real time, detecting suspicious or high-risk events. It uses behavioral analytics, machine learning, and threat intelligence to assess risk, assign risk scores, and provide actionable alerts for administrators.

Option A is correct because Identity Protection detects risks such as impossible travel, unfamiliar sign-in locations, leaked credentials, or compromised devices. Administrators can configure automated remediation, such as blocking access, forcing password resets, or requiring MFA for risky sign-ins. Detailed reporting allows security teams to investigate incidents, track trends, and monitor remediation effectiveness. Integration with Conditional Access allows risk-based policies to enforce access restrictions dynamically, ensuring that only secure and verified users can access Microsoft 365 resources. This proactive approach strengthens the organization’s security posture, reduces the likelihood of account compromise, and supports compliance with regulatory frameworks.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies focus on device security rather than monitoring sign-in activity or detecting identity risks.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention policies manage content lifecycle and do not monitor sign-in activity.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow but do not provide risk-based monitoring or automated remediation for user accounts.

Deploying Azure AD Identity Protection enables organizations to proactively protect accounts and resources. Administrators can set risk thresholds for automated actions, ensuring high-risk sign-ins are immediately addressed. Dashboards provide detailed visibility into user risk, sign-in events, and remediation actions. Security teams can correlate alerts with other Microsoft 365 security tools to create a holistic defense strategy. Automated remediation reduces response time, mitigating the impact of compromised accounts. The solution supports compliance reporting by maintaining logs of risk events and actions taken, providing evidence for audits. Identity Protection also integrates with Microsoft Defender and Conditional Access, creating a coordinated and automated security ecosystem that protects identities while maintaining operational continuity and minimizing disruption to end users.

Question 46:

Your organization wants to ensure that all Microsoft 365 email messages containing sensitive customer data are encrypted when sent externally. You also need reporting to monitor compliance and auditing for regulatory requirements. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption
B)Azure AD Conditional Access
C)Intune compliance policies
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) allows organizations to classify, label, and protect sensitive content across Microsoft 365 workloads. Sensitivity labels can enforce automatic encryption and access restrictions, ensuring that sensitive emails are protected during transit and at rest.

Option A is correct because administrators can define auto-labeling policies to detect sensitive information, such as customer PII, credit card information, or other regulated data. When detected, MIP applies labels that encrypt the email, restrict recipients to authorized users, and prevent forwarding or printing. Integration with Purview reporting provides visibility into labeling activity, access attempts, and potential policy violations, supporting auditing and compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI DSS. Auto-labeling reduces the likelihood of accidental exposure, ensuring that all sensitive messages are consistently protected without relying on user action.

Option B is incorrect because Azure AD Conditional Access manages authentication and access conditions but does not encrypt email content or enforce content-level protection.

Option C is incorrect because Intune compliance policies enforce device security but do not inspect or encrypt emails.

Option D is partially effective but limited; Exchange Online transport rules can apply rights management templates and disclaimers, but they do not provide integrated classification, auto-labeling, or reporting capabilities for regulatory compliance.

Using MIP with sensitivity labels ensures end-to-end protection for sensitive email communications. Administrators can define granular policies that apply based on content patterns, sender, recipient, or context. Audit logs provide detailed information on label application, policy enforcement, and access attempts, allowing security and compliance teams to demonstrate adherence to internal policies and external regulations. Integration with DLP policies enhances protection by detecting sensitive data and automatically enforcing restrictions. By automating encryption and labeling, organizations reduce human error, improve regulatory compliance, and maintain secure collaboration with external partners. This approach also supports consistent governance across multiple Microsoft 365 services, including Exchange, Teams, SharePoint, and OneDrive, creating a comprehensive compliance framework.

Question 47:

Your organization wants to ensure that only compliant devices can access Microsoft 365 Teams and SharePoint. You also need to enforce real-time access controls and provide reporting on device compliance status. Which solution should you implement?

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access
B)Microsoft Purview retention policies
C)Exchange Online transport rules
D)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Answer:

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Microsoft Intune allows administrators to define device compliance policies for endpoints, including requirements for encryption, operating system version, firewall, antivirus, and other security configurations. When integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access, access to Microsoft 365 workloads is restricted based on device compliance status, ensuring that only secure and trusted devices can access Teams, SharePoint, and other applications.

Option A is correct because Conditional Access evaluates device compliance in real-time before granting access. Non-compliant devices can be blocked or required to remediate issues before access is allowed. Reporting dashboards provide visibility into device health, compliance trends, and remediation status, allowing IT teams to enforce security policies proactively. This approach supports a zero-trust security model, where access is conditional on both user identity and device security.

Option B is incorrect because Purview retention policies manage content lifecycle and do not evaluate or enforce device-based access.

Option C is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules only filter email flow and do not enforce device compliance.

Option D is incorrect because DLP policies focus on content protection, not device security or access control.

Implementing Intune compliance policies with Conditional Access ensures secure access management across Microsoft 365. Administrators can enforce multiple compliance checks, including encryption, threat protection, and OS version requirements. Conditional Access ensures that only compliant devices gain access, reducing the risk of data leakage or unauthorized access. Detailed compliance reporting provides insights into trends, risk assessment, and policy effectiveness. Non-compliant devices can be guided to remediate issues automatically, minimizing operational disruption. By combining device compliance with access control, organizations create a robust security posture while maintaining productivity and regulatory compliance. Audit logs provide visibility into policy enforcement, access attempts, and non-compliant devices, ensuring alignment with organizational policies and regulatory obligations.

Question 48:

Your organization wants to prevent users from sharing Microsoft 365 documents containing financial data outside the organization. You also want users to receive notifications explaining why the sharing action was blocked. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with policy tips and enforcement
B)Azure AD Conditional Access
C)Intune compliance policies
D)Microsoft Purview retention labels

Answer:

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with policy tips and enforcement

Explanation:

Microsoft 365 DLP allows organizations to monitor, restrict, and educate users about sensitive content. DLP policies can detect financial data and prevent unauthorized sharing across SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange Online. Policy tips inform users why an action is restricted, fostering security awareness and compliance.

Option A is correct because DLP policies can inspect content for sensitive information types, apply blocking actions, and display real-time notifications to users. For example, if a user attempts to share a spreadsheet containing bank account numbers externally, DLP can block the action and display a policy tip explaining that the data cannot be shared outside the organization. Administrators can generate reports to track policy violations, assess risk, and refine enforcement strategies. Integration with Microsoft Purview allows centralized auditing and compliance reporting, ensuring regulatory adherence. Organizations can define varying levels of enforcement, such as monitoring only, warnings, or full blocking, based on risk tolerance and business needs.

Option B is incorrect because Conditional Access manages access based on identity, device, or location but does not inspect or restrict content sharing.

Option C is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage devices, not content or sharing behavior.

Option D is incorrect because Purview retention labels focus on content lifecycle and retention, not real-time content sharing prevention.

Implementing DLP with policy tips ensures proactive protection and user education. Administrators can configure policies to detect specific content types, keywords, or patterns, applying enforcement consistently across all workloads. Policy tips provide context to users, reducing accidental violations and promoting a security-aware culture. Reporting and auditing tools allow IT teams to track incidents, evaluate policy effectiveness, and demonstrate compliance with regulatory frameworks such as SOX, PCI DSS, and GDPR. By combining content detection, enforcement, and user notifications, DLP creates a balanced approach that maintains productivity while safeguarding sensitive financial information from unauthorized exposure. Automated policy enforcement and reporting capabilities also reduce operational risk and enable rapid incident response.

Question 49:

Your organization wants to migrate on-premises OneDrive for Business accounts to Microsoft 365 while preserving user permissions, file metadata, and version history. You also want to minimize downtime for users. Which solution should you implement?

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with OneDrive migration settings
B)OneDrive sync client
C)Azure Storage Explorer
D)Manual copy via File Explorer

Answer:

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with OneDrive migration settings

Explanation:

The SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) allows organizations to migrate OneDrive for Business accounts, SharePoint sites, and file shares to Microsoft 365 while preserving metadata, permissions, version history, and folder structures. It supports incremental migrations to minimize downtime and ensure a seamless user experience.

Option A is correct because SPMT allows administrators to migrate OneDrive accounts in batches, preserving ownership, permissions, and version history. Incremental migration ensures that files created or modified during the initial migration are also transferred without downtime. Pre-migration scanning identifies potential issues such as unsupported characters, file size limits, or permission conflicts. Migration logs provide detailed insights into successes, errors, and warnings, enabling IT teams to remediate issues efficiently. SPMT also allows scheduling migrations during off-peak hours, reducing disruption to users and maintaining productivity.

Option B is incorrect because the OneDrive sync client synchronizes files between a local device and OneDrive but does not support migration with metadata, permissions, or version history.

Option C is incorrect because Azure Storage Explorer manages Azure Storage resources, not OneDrive content migration.

Option D is incorrect because manual copying via File Explorer is error-prone, cannot preserve permissions or version history, and is unsuitable for enterprise-scale migration.

By using SPMT, organizations ensure secure, efficient, and compliant OneDrive migrations. Administrators can plan incremental migrations, maintain user productivity, and verify the integrity of migrated content. Permissions and ownership are preserved, enabling users to continue accessing their files without interruption. Detailed migration reporting and logging provide transparency and support compliance with internal policies and regulatory requirements. Integration with Microsoft 365 compliance tools ensures that sensitive content remains protected after migration. SPMT also supports mapping of user accounts, handling of large file volumes, and incremental updates, ensuring that migrations are efficient, predictable, and minimally disruptive to business operations.

Question 50:

Your organization wants to enforce sensitivity labeling and encryption for documents stored in SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business based on content type, such as financial data or customer PII. You also want centralized reporting and auditing of labeled content. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) provides classification, labeling, and protection for sensitive content across Microsoft 365 workloads, including SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business. Sensitivity labels can automatically apply encryption, access restrictions, and sharing policies based on content inspection.

Option A is correct because administrators can configure auto-labeling policies that detect content such as financial data, PII, or intellectual property. Labels enforce encryption, restrict access to authorized users, and integrate with Microsoft Purview reporting and auditing tools. This allows security and compliance teams to monitor labeled content, track access events, and generate reports for regulatory purposes. Automated labeling ensures consistency and reduces the risk of human error. Labels can also integrate with DLP policies to block unauthorized sharing or copying of sensitive content.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies focus on device security, not content labeling or protection.

Option C is incorrect because Azure AD Conditional Access enforces authentication and access based on identity and device compliance, but does not classify or encrypt content.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules only apply to email messages and do not provide labeling or encryption for SharePoint or OneDrive content.

By deploying MIP with sensitivity labels, organizations implement consistent content protection and compliance governance. Administrators can define granular policies for auto-labeling based on content type, location, or user role. Automated application of labels ensures sensitive data is consistently protected, while encryption prevents unauthorized access. Audit logs and reporting provide transparency, enabling compliance verification and regulatory reporting. Integration with DLP policies further enhances protection by detecting and preventing policy violations. This solution provides a comprehensive data protection framework that supports secure collaboration, maintains regulatory compliance, and reduces operational risk. Users benefit from seamless protection, while administrators gain centralized control and monitoring capabilities, ensuring organizational policies are enforced consistently across all Microsoft 365 workloads.

Question 51:

Your organization wants to monitor Microsoft 365 user activity and detect suspicious downloads, uploads, or file sharing in OneDrive for Business and SharePoint Online. You also want automated alerts for abnormal activity. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Microsoft Purview retention policies

Answer:

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (previously known as Cloud App Security) is a cloud access security broker (CASB) that enables organizations to monitor, detect, and protect cloud applications. It provides deep visibility into user activities, detects unusual or risky behavior, and enforces policies to secure data.

Option A is correct because Defender for Cloud Apps can monitor file activity in OneDrive and SharePoint Online, including downloads, uploads, sharing with external users, and mass deletion. By analyzing user behavior patterns and applying machine learning, it detects anomalies such as mass downloads, abnormal sharing patterns, or access from unfamiliar locations or devices. Security teams can configure automated alerts and actions, such as sending notifications, blocking risky activities, or restricting access to sensitive files. Integration with Microsoft 365 DLP and sensitivity labels enhances protection, ensuring that sensitive content remains secure while allowing legitimate collaboration. Reporting dashboards provide insights into user activity, high-risk events, and potential policy violations, enabling proactive threat detection and compliance monitoring.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device configurations and compliance status but do not monitor file activity or user behavior in cloud apps.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access enforces access controls based on device, identity, or location but does not provide activity monitoring or anomaly detection.

Option D is incorrect because Purview retention policies manage content lifecycle but do not monitor real-time user activity or enforce behavioral alerts.

Using Defender for Cloud Apps ensures end-to-end monitoring and risk management in Microsoft 365. Administrators can define policies to detect suspicious activity patterns, such as simultaneous downloads from multiple locations, unusual external sharing, or access from unmanaged devices. Alerts can be configured to trigger automated remediation, including blocking access, revoking sharing permissions, or quarantining files. Integration with Microsoft Sentinel or other SIEM tools allows security teams to investigate incidents and correlate alerts across workloads. This proactive approach reduces the risk of data exfiltration, insider threats, and accidental leaks. Detailed reporting supports compliance with regulatory requirements and internal policies, providing a defensible record of monitoring, incidents, and remediation actions. Additionally, machine learning continuously refines anomaly detection, ensuring that alerts are precise and relevant while minimizing false positives. Organizations can also combine Defender for Cloud Apps with DLP and sensitivity labeling for a layered security strategy that protects sensitive data without impeding collaboration.

Question 52:

Your organization wants to prevent users from forwarding confidential emails outside the organization while still allowing internal collaboration. You also need to apply encryption automatically based on content sensitivity. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption
B)Azure AD Conditional Access
C)Intune compliance policies
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels and automatic encryption

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to classify, label, and protect sensitive content automatically. Sensitivity labels can enforce encryption, restrict forwarding, and control access based on content classification.

Option A is correct because MIP labels can be configured to detect confidential or sensitive emails and automatically apply encryption and access restrictions. For example, an email containing customer data or trade secrets can be labeled as “Confidential,” preventing forwarding or copying outside the organization. Users receive notifications explaining the restrictions, which helps maintain productivity while ensuring compliance. Integration with Microsoft Purview reporting provides visibility into labeled content, access attempts, and policy enforcement, supporting auditing and regulatory compliance. Auto-labeling ensures consistent protection across all users and reduces the likelihood of accidental data leakage. Labels can also integrate with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policies to further restrict unauthorized access or sharing.

Option B is incorrect because Conditional Access manages access based on user identity, location, or device compliance, not content-level restrictions or encryption.

Option C is incorrect because Intune compliance policies enforce device-level configurations but cannot inspect or encrypt email content.

Option D is partially effective but limited; Exchange transport rules can apply rights management templates, disclaimers, or block forwarding, but they do not provide the integrated labeling, auto-encryption, and auditing capabilities that MIP offers.

Implementing MIP with sensitivity labels ensures automated content protection and regulatory compliance. Administrators can define policies for different types of sensitive content, such as financial information, PII, intellectual property, or internal confidential data. Auto-labeling ensures that sensitive content is protected consistently without relying on user intervention. Encryption ensures that only authorized recipients can read the content, while access restrictions prevent forwarding, printing, or downloading. Reporting dashboards provide detailed insights into labeled content, access attempts, and policy compliance. Integration with DLP policies provides additional enforcement by blocking unauthorized actions in real-time. This comprehensive approach balances security with productivity, allowing secure collaboration while minimizing the risk of data exposure. Audit logs support compliance with GDPR, HIPAA, SOX, and other regulatory frameworks, providing a defensible record of policy enforcement and user actions.

Question 53:

Your organization wants to migrate large volumes of on-premises SharePoint sites to SharePoint Online while preserving permissions, metadata, version history, and workflows. You also need a solution that supports incremental migration to reduce downtime. Which solution should you implement?

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with full site migration settings
B)OneDrive sync client
C)Manual export/import via File Explorer
D)Azure Storage Explorer

Answer:

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with full site migration settings

Explanation:

The SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) is designed to migrate on-premises SharePoint content to SharePoint Online while preserving metadata, permissions, version history, workflows, and custom site structures. It supports incremental migration to minimize downtime and ensure content continuity.

Option A is correct because SPMT allows administrators to migrate entire sites or site collections in batches. The tool preserves folder hierarchy, permissions, workflows, version history, and custom site templates. Pre-migration scans identify potential issues, such as unsupported characters or large files, enabling remediation before migration. Incremental migration ensures that changes made during migration are captured, reducing disruption to users. Detailed migration logs and reporting provide transparency, enabling administrators to monitor progress, verify integrity, and address errors efficiently. Scheduling migrations during off-peak hours further minimizes operational impact and supports a seamless transition.

Option B is incorrect because the OneDrive sync client only synchronizes files between a local device and OneDrive but does not migrate full SharePoint sites or preserve workflows, metadata, or permissions.

Option C is incorrect because manual export/import via File Explorer is time-consuming, prone to errors, and does not maintain metadata, permissions, or workflows.

Option D is incorrect because Azure Storage Explorer manages Azure storage accounts but cannot migrate SharePoint content effectively.

Using SPMT with full site migration settings ensures secure, efficient, and compliant migrations. Administrators can map users, maintain site permissions, and verify content integrity post-migration. Incremental migration allows content updates to be captured throughout the migration process, reducing downtime and minimizing business disruption. Audit logs and reporting provide insights into migration progress, errors, and compliance adherence. SPMT supports large-scale migrations while maintaining organizational continuity, ensuring that workflows, site structures, and metadata remain intact. Integration with Microsoft 365 security and compliance tools ensures that sensitive content remains protected during and after migration. By leveraging automated scheduling, reporting, and incremental updates, SPMT provides a scalable, repeatable migration solution for enterprise organizations seeking to move from on-premises SharePoint to SharePoint Online.

Question 54:

Your organization wants to ensure that all users have strong, unique passwords and that high-risk accounts are automatically remediated if suspicious activity is detected. Which solution should you implement?

A)Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention labels
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation policies

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection is a cloud-based identity security solution that detects risky sign-ins and compromised accounts using behavioral analytics, threat intelligence, and machine learning. It can enforce automated remediation, including password resets, MFA enforcement, or sign-in restrictions.

Option A is correct because Identity Protection evaluates user sign-ins and account risk levels in real time. High-risk accounts, such as those exhibiting impossible travel, unfamiliar IP locations, or credentials leaked on the dark web, can be remediated automatically. Administrators can configure policies that require MFA, force password changes, or block access for high-risk users. Dashboards provide visibility into risk events, remediation actions, and user risk scores, supporting proactive management and regulatory compliance. Integration with Conditional Access enables dynamic, risk-based access enforcement, ensuring that sensitive Microsoft 365 resources are protected without unnecessarily restricting low-risk users.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device security, not account risk or automated remediation.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle, not account security or risk detection.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow and content but cannot detect or remediate compromised accounts.

Deploying Identity Protection with automated remediation provides proactive protection for Microsoft 365 identities. Administrators can define risk thresholds, configure automated actions, and integrate alerts with SIEM solutions for comprehensive monitoring. High-risk users are remediated quickly, reducing exposure to attacks. Detailed reporting allows auditing of incidents, risk trends, and remediation effectiveness. Identity Protection supports regulatory compliance, including GDPR and HIPAA, by maintaining detailed records of account risk, remediation actions, and policy enforcement. By combining detection, risk assessment, and automated remediation, organizations strengthen their identity security posture, reduce the likelihood of account compromise, and maintain productivity while protecting sensitive resources.

Question 55:

Your organization wants to implement Microsoft 365 retention policies to comply with legal and regulatory requirements. You need to retain content for a specified period, prevent deletion during the retention period, and generate reports for audit purposes. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview retention policies and labels
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview retention policies and labels

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview retention policies and labels provide content lifecycle management across Microsoft 365 workloads. Retention policies define how long content must be retained, while retention labels can apply these settings to specific items or libraries.

Option A is correct because retention policies prevent users from deleting content during the retention period, ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Administrators can configure policies for Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, OneDrive, and Teams. Retention labels provide granular control for specific documents or emails. Purview reporting and auditing tools allow administrators to track policy application, monitor content retention, and generate audit logs for compliance purposes. Disposition reviews can be configured for content at the end of its retention period, allowing controlled deletion under administrative supervision.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage devices, not content retention or lifecycle.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access enforces access based on identity and device compliance, not content retention.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules only manage email flow and content processing but do not enforce retention across workloads.

Using Purview retention policies and labels ensures consistent governance and compliance. Administrators can define policies based on content type, location, or user role, applying retention automatically or manually through labels. Reporting dashboards provide transparency into policy enforcement, retention status, and potential violations. Integration with eDiscovery allows organizations to locate and preserve content for legal or regulatory investigations. Retention policies help reduce risk of data loss, maintain compliance with laws such as SOX, GDPR, or HIPAA, and ensure organizational content is managed securely throughout its lifecycle. The solution balances compliance, security, and operational efficiency, providing a robust framework for managing content retention and deletion across Microsoft 365.

Question 56:

Your organization wants to enable secure external collaboration in Microsoft 365 while ensuring that external users can only access specific documents and resources. You also need to enforce auditing and reporting on external sharing activity. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft 365 External Sharing settings with Microsoft Purview auditing
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft 365 External Sharing settings with Microsoft Purview auditing

Explanation:

Microsoft 365 provides granular external sharing controls that allow administrators to share content securely with external users while protecting sensitive organizational data. These controls apply to SharePoint Online, OneDrive for Business, and Teams.

Option A is correct because external sharing settings allow organizations to define who can access content, whether sharing requires guest accounts, and what permissions are granted (view, edit, or collaborate). External users can be restricted to specific sites, folders, or files. Integration with Microsoft Purview auditing enables administrators to track and report all external sharing activities, including file downloads, edits, and invitations. Detailed logs provide visibility into access attempts, policy violations, and potential risks, supporting regulatory compliance such as GDPR or HIPAA. Conditional sharing policies can also enforce expiration dates on external access or require MFA for guest users, enhancing security without compromising collaboration.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies focus on device security and do not control external sharing of content.

Option C is partially related but insufficient alone; Conditional Access can enforce access based on device or location but cannot define detailed document-level sharing permissions.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow, not document or site-level external sharing.

Implementing Microsoft 365 external sharing settings with auditing ensures secure, compliant collaboration. Administrators can define default sharing policies for the organization, configure site-specific settings, and enforce guest access approval workflows. Reporting dashboards provide insights into which external users have access to content, what actions they perform, and any violations of sharing policies. Security teams can proactively monitor for unusual sharing patterns or unauthorized access. Integration with sensitivity labels and DLP policies adds an extra layer of protection, ensuring that sensitive data is only shared with authorized external users under defined conditions. Automated alerts notify administrators of policy violations or abnormal activities, allowing rapid remediation. This approach balances productivity and collaboration with robust security, providing visibility, control, and compliance across all external sharing activities.

Question 57:

Your organization wants to implement a solution that automatically detects and protects sensitive data stored in Microsoft 365 applications such as Exchange, Teams, SharePoint, and OneDrive. The solution must also generate detailed compliance reports. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is a comprehensive solution for detecting, monitoring, and protecting sensitive information across Microsoft 365 workloads. It helps organizations prevent unintentional or unauthorized data exposure, ensuring compliance with internal policies and external regulations.

Option A is correct because DLP can inspect emails, documents, and chats for sensitive information types, such as credit card numbers, personal data, or intellectual property. Policies can enforce actions such as blocking content sharing, applying encryption, or notifying users of violations. DLP integrates with Microsoft Purview compliance reporting to generate detailed logs, including policy violations, attempted sharing of sensitive content, and user activity patterns. Administrators can create rules tailored to organizational requirements, define exceptions, and track enforcement across all Microsoft 365 workloads. Automated policy enforcement ensures consistent protection without relying solely on user discretion. DLP also works alongside sensitivity labels, allowing organizations to classify content and automatically apply protection when sensitive data is detected.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies focus on device security rather than content protection or compliance reporting.

Option C is incorrect because Azure AD Conditional Access manages access controls but does not inspect or enforce policies on content itself.

Option D is partially effective but limited; Exchange transport rules only filter email content and cannot provide comprehensive coverage across Teams, SharePoint, or OneDrive.

Deploying DLP ensures consistent, automated protection of sensitive content. Policies can be scoped by location, user, document type, or sensitivity, providing granular control. Automated alerts notify administrators and users when policy violations occur, fostering awareness and enabling rapid remediation. Detailed reporting supports audits and compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, SOX, or PCI DSS. Integration with Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels enhances enforcement by applying encryption, access restrictions, or usage restrictions based on content classification. Security teams can analyze trends in policy violations to refine rules, mitigate risks, and train employees on secure handling of sensitive data. By combining content inspection, automated enforcement, and comprehensive reporting, organizations create a robust framework for data governance and compliance across the entire Microsoft 365 environment.

Question 58:

Your organization wants to enable self-service group management in Microsoft 365, allowing users to create, manage, and request membership for Microsoft 365 groups while ensuring approval workflows and compliance auditing. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft 365 Group Settings and Microsoft Purview auditing
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft 365 Group Settings and Microsoft Purview auditing

Explanation:

Microsoft 365 provides self-service group management that allows users to create, manage, and request access to groups while maintaining administrative control and compliance oversight.

Option A is correct because Microsoft 365 Group Settings enable administrators to configure creation permissions, approval workflows, and expiration policies. Users can request membership or create groups based on organizational policies, while administrators can approve or deny requests. Integration with Microsoft Purview auditing allows detailed reporting of group activity, including group creation, membership changes, and access permissions. This provides a clear audit trail for compliance and governance purposes. Policies can enforce expiration of inactive groups, ensuring that stale groups do not remain in the environment, reducing security risk and clutter. Administrators can also configure naming conventions, classification labels, and approval processes for sensitive groups.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies focus on device configuration and security, not group management or governance.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access manages access based on identity and device conditions but does not control group creation, membership workflows, or auditing.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange transport rules only manage email flow and do not provide group management or compliance reporting.

Implementing self-service group management with auditing ensures efficient collaboration with proper governance. Users gain flexibility to create and manage groups, fostering productivity and collaboration. Automated approval workflows prevent unauthorized group creation or membership, maintaining organizational security and policy compliance. Expiration policies and lifecycle management help reduce unused groups and potential security risks. Audit logs provide transparency for administrators and support regulatory compliance by tracking creation, modification, and deletion events. Integration with classification and sensitivity labels allows organizations to enforce protection for high-risk or sensitive groups. Combined with Microsoft Purview reporting, administrators can identify trends, optimize policies, and ensure that self-service capabilities align with organizational compliance and security requirements. This approach balances user empowerment with centralized control, enabling secure and compliant collaboration across Microsoft 365.

Question 59:

Your organization wants to enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users accessing Microsoft 365 applications, but you also want to allow conditional access policies to bypass MFA for trusted locations or compliant devices. Which solution should you implement?

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with MFA policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention labels
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with MFA policies

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access provides a flexible and secure approach to enforce MFA while supporting conditional policies for trusted locations, compliant devices, or low-risk scenarios.

Option A is correct because Conditional Access allows administrators to define policies that require MFA based on risk, location, device compliance, and user or group membership. Trusted locations or compliant devices can be exempted from MFA requirements, reducing friction for low-risk users while maintaining security. Administrators can configure policy precedence, exclusions, and enforcement actions. Conditional Access integrates with Azure AD Identity Protection to detect risky sign-ins and apply dynamic MFA enforcement. Reporting dashboards provide visibility into policy application, sign-in patterns, and user compliance, supporting operational efficiency and regulatory compliance.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies enforce device security but cannot configure MFA requirements or conditional access rules.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle and protection, not authentication policies.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange transport rules only affect email flow and do not enforce MFA or access policies.

By implementing Conditional Access with MFA, organizations strengthen identity security while maintaining flexibility. Policies can enforce MFA selectively, providing strong protection for high-risk scenarios and sensitive applications while reducing user friction in trusted environments. Administrators can configure MFA enforcement for specific applications, groups, or scenarios, ensuring comprehensive security coverage. Integration with risk detection tools enables adaptive authentication, which dynamically adjusts enforcement based on user behavior or threat intelligence. Audit logs and reporting dashboards provide visibility into MFA compliance, sign-in events, and policy exceptions, supporting continuous monitoring and regulatory compliance. Conditional Access policies also support zero-trust principles by ensuring access is granted based on user identity, device health, and context, providing a secure and scalable approach to MFA enforcement across Microsoft 365.

Question 60:

Your organization wants to ensure that Microsoft 365 audit logs are retained for at least seven years to comply with regulatory and legal requirements. You also need a solution that allows administrators to search and export audit logs efficiently. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Audit (Unified Audit Log) with retention policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Audit (Unified Audit Log) with retention policies

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Audit provides a centralized audit log solution for Microsoft 365, capturing activities across Exchange Online, SharePoint Online, OneDrive, Teams, Azure AD, and other workloads. It enables organizations to maintain logs for regulatory compliance, legal requirements, and internal investigations.

Option A is correct because Purview Audit allows administrators to configure audit log retention, search and filter audit events, and export logs for long-term storage. By enabling unified auditing, organizations can track user and administrator activities, such as mailbox access, document sharing, permissions changes, and security configurations. Retention policies ensure that logs are preserved for compliance periods, such as seven years, supporting regulatory frameworks like GDPR, SOX, HIPAA, or SEC rules. The solution also provides advanced search capabilities, allowing administrators to identify specific events, investigate incidents, or respond to legal requests efficiently. Integration with eDiscovery ensures that audit logs can be included in investigations or legal holds.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device settings, not audit log retention.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access enforces access policies but does not manage audit logs or retention.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules only manage email flow, not audit logging across workloads.

By implementing Microsoft Purview Audit with retention policies, organizations can maintain a comprehensive record of user and administrative activity across Microsoft 365. Logs can be searched, filtered, and exported for analysis, supporting compliance, legal, and internal audit requirements. Retention ensures that historical data is preserved for the mandated period, enabling organizations to respond to regulatory inquiries or legal investigations. Administrators gain insight into suspicious activities, policy violations, and operational trends. Integration with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and compliance tools enables coordinated investigations and incident response. Unified auditing provides a single pane of visibility for activity across Exchange, SharePoint, Teams, Azure AD, and other workloads, simplifying compliance management while ensuring transparency, accountability, and data governance.