Microsoft MS-102 365 Administrator Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 4 Q61-80

Visit here for our full Microsoft MS-102 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 61:

Your organization wants to enforce automatic classification and protection of documents containing personally identifiable information (PII) stored in SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business. You also need reporting for compliance audits and real-time enforcement of policies. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with auto-labeling policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with auto-labeling policies

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) allows organizations to automate the classification, labeling, and protection of sensitive information across Microsoft 365 workloads. Auto-labeling policies scan content in SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business to detect sensitive information, such as PII, financial data, or health information, and apply labels that enforce encryption, access restrictions, and sharing limitations.

Option A is correct because auto-labeling policies eliminate reliance on user discretion, ensuring consistent protection for sensitive data. MIP supports rules that detect content patterns, regular expressions, or sensitive information types, triggering automatic labeling and enforcement. This ensures that confidential documents are encrypted and restricted to authorized users. Integration with Microsoft Purview reporting provides compliance teams with visibility into policy enforcement, access attempts, and any potential violations, supporting audit and regulatory requirements like GDPR or HIPAA. Real-time enforcement ensures that sensitive content cannot be shared externally or accessed by unauthorized users, reducing risk while enabling secure collaboration.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies focus on device security, not content classification or protection.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access manages access based on identity, device, and risk conditions but does not inspect or classify content.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules apply to email flow and cannot classify or protect documents in SharePoint or OneDrive.

Implementing MIP with auto-labeling provides end-to-end protection for sensitive documents. Administrators can configure granular policies that detect specific data types, apply protection automatically, and monitor enforcement via detailed audit logs. Users are informed through notifications or policy tips when sensitive content is classified or restricted, fostering awareness and compliance. This proactive approach reduces the risk of accidental data leakage, strengthens data governance, and ensures compliance with internal and regulatory standards. Reporting dashboards allow security teams to track labeled content, analyze access patterns, and generate compliance reports for auditors. Integration with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) policies enhances enforcement by blocking unauthorized sharing or downloading attempts. By combining automated labeling, encryption, and real-time policy enforcement, organizations can protect sensitive content effectively while maintaining user productivity and collaboration.

Question 62:

Your organization wants to migrate on-premises Microsoft Exchange mailboxes to Microsoft 365 while maintaining mailbox permissions, calendar sharing, and message classifications. You also want minimal downtime for end users. Which solution should you implement?

A)Hybrid Exchange migration with mailbox migration tool
B)Cutover migration
C)IMAP migration
D)Manual export/import via PST

Answer:

A)Hybrid Exchange migration with mailbox migration tool

Explanation:

A hybrid Exchange migration enables organizations to coexist between on-premises Exchange servers and Exchange Online, providing a controlled, staged migration for mailboxes, calendars, and permissions.

Option A is correct because hybrid migration preserves mailbox permissions, calendar sharing, message classifications, and other mailbox settings while enabling incremental migration to minimize downtime. Administrators can migrate mailboxes in batches, ensuring that users continue to have access to their emails and calendars during the transition. The mailbox migration tool automatically maps permissions and synchronizes content to Exchange Online, providing a seamless experience. Pre-migration checks identify potential issues such as invalid email addresses or oversized mailboxes, while post-migration reports verify data integrity. Hybrid migration supports coexistence, allowing users to interact with both on-premises and cloud mailboxes during migration, reducing operational disruption.

Option B is incorrect because cutover migration moves all mailboxes at once, which can result in downtime and is unsuitable for large organizations.

Option C is incorrect because IMAP migration only transfers emails, not calendar items, permissions, or classifications.

Option D is incorrect because manual export/import via PST is time-consuming, error-prone, and does not preserve mailbox features like permissions or shared calendars.

Using hybrid migration ensures efficient, secure, and compliant mailbox migration. Administrators can stage migrations, synchronize mailbox permissions, and maintain user productivity. Calendar sharing and delegate access remain intact, ensuring business continuity. Detailed migration logs provide insights into successes, failures, and exceptions, enabling rapid remediation. Compliance requirements are preserved, including message classifications and retention policies, which may be necessary for regulatory reporting or legal holds. Integration with Exchange Online security and compliance tools provides consistent policy enforcement during and after migration. Hybrid migration is highly scalable, supporting organizations of all sizes while ensuring minimal disruption and a smooth transition from on-premises Exchange to Microsoft 365.

Question 63:

Your organization wants to enforce device-based conditional access for Microsoft 365 applications. Users should only be able to access resources from devices that meet compliance policies, and non-compliant devices should be blocked. Which solution should you implement?

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access
B)Microsoft Purview retention labels
C)Exchange Online transport rules
D)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Answer:

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Microsoft Intune allows administrators to define device compliance policies, including encryption, OS version, antivirus status, and firewall configuration. When integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access, these policies enforce real-time access control, allowing only compliant devices to access Microsoft 365 resources.

Option A is correct because Conditional Access evaluates device compliance before granting access to applications like Teams, SharePoint, and Exchange Online. Non-compliant devices are blocked or required to remediate issues before access is granted. Reports provide insights into device health, compliance trends, and remediation actions, enabling administrators to monitor and enforce organizational security policies. This approach aligns with zero-trust principles, ensuring access is conditional on device health and security posture, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or data leakage.

Option B is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle, not device access.

Option C is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules control email flow and content but do not enforce device compliance.

Option D is incorrect because DLP policies focus on content protection, not device compliance or access control.

Implementing Intune compliance policies with Conditional Access ensures secure and managed access to Microsoft 365 resources. Administrators can configure multiple compliance checks, including encryption, threat protection, OS version, and security patches. Conditional Access dynamically evaluates compliance before granting access, reducing risk while maintaining user productivity. Non-compliant devices can be guided through remediation processes automatically, minimizing operational impact. Compliance dashboards provide administrators with visibility into device risk trends, enforcement actions, and policy adherence. By integrating device compliance with access policies, organizations enforce a layered security strategy, ensuring that only trusted endpoints gain access. This solution reduces the likelihood of data breaches, supports regulatory compliance, and maintains operational efficiency while protecting sensitive resources in Microsoft 365.

Question 64:

Your organization wants to prevent sensitive financial documents from being shared externally via Microsoft Teams or SharePoint Online. Users should receive a warning when attempting to share such content, and administrators need detailed reporting for compliance purposes. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with policy tips
B)Azure AD Conditional Access
C)Intune compliance policies
D)Microsoft Purview retention labels

Answer:

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with policy tips

Explanation:

Microsoft 365 DLP enables organizations to detect, restrict, and educate users about sensitive information in real-time across Microsoft 365 workloads. Policy tips notify users of potential violations while providing administrators with detailed reporting and enforcement capabilities.

Option A is correct because DLP policies can inspect files and messages for sensitive information, such as financial data or PII, and take predefined actions. Users attempting to share restricted content externally receive policy tips, explaining why the action is blocked or restricted. Administrators can generate compliance reports detailing policy violations, user activity, and enforcement outcomes. DLP integrates with Microsoft Purview to provide a centralized compliance framework, enabling automated enforcement and visibility across Exchange Online, Teams, SharePoint Online, and OneDrive. This approach ensures sensitive data remains protected while fostering awareness among end users.

Option B is incorrect because Conditional Access enforces access based on identity, device, and location but does not inspect or block content.

Option C is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device configurations, not content protection.

Option D is incorrect because retention labels govern content lifecycle and retention, not sharing restrictions or real-time enforcement.

Deploying DLP with policy tips ensures proactive content protection and compliance awareness. Administrators can create policies that automatically detect sensitive data and enforce restrictions, reducing accidental exposure. Policy tips provide context to users, improving security behavior and minimizing workflow disruption. Reporting tools provide insights into compliance trends, high-risk users, and potential policy gaps. DLP supports regulatory compliance, including SOX, GDPR, and HIPAA, by documenting enforcement actions and providing auditable logs. Integration with sensitivity labels and encryption further strengthens data protection, ensuring that sensitive financial information cannot be accessed or shared inappropriately. By combining automated detection, user education, and detailed reporting, DLP provides a comprehensive solution for securing sensitive content in Microsoft 365 while maintaining productivity.

Question 65:

Your organization wants to detect and remediate risky Microsoft 365 accounts automatically. High-risk users should be required to reset passwords or perform additional verification, and administrators must receive alerts for monitoring and auditing purposes. Which solution should you implement?

A)Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention labels
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation policies

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection is a cloud-based identity security platform that continuously monitors Microsoft 365 accounts for suspicious activity. It assigns risk levels based on behavioral analysis, unusual sign-ins, leaked credentials, and other signals.

Option A is correct because administrators can configure automated remediation policies for high-risk accounts. Actions include enforcing password resets, requiring multi-factor authentication, or temporarily blocking access. Identity Protection integrates with Conditional Access to ensure adaptive access control based on risk levels. Detailed reporting and audit logs provide administrators with insights into risk events, actions taken, and policy effectiveness, supporting compliance and incident response. Automated remediation reduces the time between detection and mitigation, minimizing the likelihood of account compromise and data breaches.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage devices, not account-level risk or automated remediation.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle and retention, not identity security.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange transport rules only affect email flow and cannot detect or remediate risky accounts.

Using Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation provides proactive, risk-based account security. Policies can enforce MFA for risky users, block sign-ins from unusual locations, and require verification for suspicious activity. Integration with auditing and reporting tools ensures administrators can track events, generate compliance reports, and respond to incidents efficiently. The solution supports regulatory frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and SOX by maintaining detailed records of risk detection and remediation actions. Automated remediation ensures that high-risk accounts are addressed quickly, reducing exposure to cyber threats and protecting sensitive Microsoft 365 resources. By combining detection, adaptive access, and automated mitigation, organizations maintain a strong security posture while minimizing disruption to legitimate users.

Question 66:

Your organization wants to implement Microsoft 365 retention policies to automatically retain Teams chat messages for a defined period, prevent deletion during the retention period, and allow auditing for compliance purposes. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview retention policies and labels
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview retention policies and labels

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview retention policies allow organizations to manage the lifecycle of content across Microsoft 365 workloads, including Teams chats and channel messages. These policies ensure content is retained for a defined period, cannot be deleted prematurely, and supports audit and compliance requirements.

Option A is correct because Purview retention policies can apply to Teams messages in chats or channels. Administrators can define retention periods to meet regulatory requirements, such as retaining messages for 3, 5, or 7 years. The policies prevent end users from deleting messages during the retention period, ensuring that information remains available for audits, eDiscovery, or legal investigations. Retention labels can be applied automatically or manually to messages to classify content for compliance purposes. Purview reporting provides visibility into policy application, retention status, and audit trails, which helps organizations maintain regulatory compliance with frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX. Retention policies can be configured for both user-generated messages and system-generated content, ensuring comprehensive coverage across Teams workloads.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies enforce device security but cannot manage content retention or lifecycle.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access manages access based on identity and device compliance but does not govern content retention or audit trails.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow and processing, not Teams message retention.

Implementing Purview retention policies ensures consistent compliance and governance for Teams chat messages. Administrators can create policies based on user, group, or message location, ensuring precise control over content lifecycle. Automated application of retention labels reduces human error, ensures consistent enforcement, and protects sensitive communications from deletion. Audit logs allow compliance teams to track enforcement actions, investigate potential violations, and provide evidence for regulatory reporting. Retention policies integrate with eDiscovery, allowing organizations to search for messages or files under retention in response to legal investigations. By preventing deletion of critical content and providing detailed auditing, Purview retention policies help organizations meet compliance obligations while maintaining operational efficiency, ensuring that Teams remains a secure collaboration environment.

Question 67:

Your organization wants to protect documents containing intellectual property stored in SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business. Documents should be automatically classified, encrypted, and restricted from being shared externally based on content sensitivity. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) with sensitivity labels

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to classify, label, and protect sensitive content automatically. Sensitivity labels can enforce encryption, access restrictions, and sharing limitations for documents containing intellectual property, trade secrets, or other high-value content.

Option A is correct because MIP allows administrators to create auto-labeling policies that scan documents in SharePoint Online and OneDrive for Business. When intellectual property is detected, the policy automatically applies a sensitivity label, encrypts the document, and restricts external sharing. Users are notified through policy tips, ensuring awareness and compliance without impeding collaboration. Detailed audit and reporting capabilities provide administrators with insights into labeled content, access attempts, and potential violations, supporting regulatory and internal compliance requirements. Integration with Data Loss Prevention (DLP) ensures that sensitive documents cannot be inadvertently shared or leaked outside the organization. MIP can also enforce restrictions such as preventing printing or copying, ensuring that high-risk content remains secure even after sharing with authorized internal users.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies enforce device-level security, not content protection or classification.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access manages access based on identity, device compliance, or location but does not inspect or protect content.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules apply to email flow and do not provide protection for documents stored in SharePoint or OneDrive.

Using MIP with sensitivity labels ensures automated protection of intellectual property across Microsoft 365. Administrators can define granular policies based on content types, patterns, or keywords. Encryption prevents unauthorized access, while access restrictions and sharing limitations maintain control over sensitive information. Audit logs and reports allow compliance teams to track policy application, user behavior, and incidents, supporting regulatory and internal governance requirements. Automated labeling reduces human error and ensures consistent application across all workloads, while integration with DLP and Purview reporting provides a comprehensive content protection framework. By combining classification, encryption, and access restrictions, organizations can secure their intellectual property effectively while enabling collaboration and compliance with corporate policies and regulatory requirements.

Question 68:

Your organization wants to enforce multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all users accessing Microsoft 365 applications but allow exceptions for devices that meet compliance requirements or are in trusted network locations. Which solution should you implement?

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with MFA policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention labels
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with MFA policies

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access enables organizations to enforce adaptive, risk-based access controls, including MFA, while allowing granular exceptions based on device compliance, location, and other conditions.

Option A is correct because Conditional Access policies can require MFA for users accessing Microsoft 365 applications and provide exceptions for trusted locations or compliant devices. For example, users signing in from the corporate network or devices meeting Intune compliance requirements may bypass MFA, reducing friction while maintaining security for high-risk scenarios. Policies can also be configured for specific applications, user groups, or risk levels. Integration with Azure AD Identity Protection enhances security by detecting risky sign-ins and enforcing additional verification automatically. Reporting dashboards allow administrators to monitor MFA compliance, policy enforcement, and unusual sign-in patterns, supporting operational oversight and regulatory compliance. Conditional Access ensures that MFA is applied dynamically and contextually, aligning with zero-trust principles.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies enforce device security but cannot mandate MFA or conditional access rules.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention labels govern content lifecycle, not authentication or MFA enforcement.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules only manage email flow and content, not access or authentication policies.

Implementing Conditional Access with MFA policies ensures strong identity protection while maintaining usability. Administrators can define policies that balance security with productivity by applying MFA only in high-risk scenarios or for users accessing sensitive workloads. Trusted locations and compliant devices reduce unnecessary MFA prompts, improving user experience. Risk-based policies dynamically enforce additional verification based on unusual sign-in behavior, impossible travel, or risky IP addresses. Audit logs and reporting provide visibility into policy effectiveness, MFA compliance, and user behavior, enabling continuous improvement and alignment with security frameworks such as NIST, ISO 27001, or zero-trust guidelines. This approach ensures that Microsoft 365 resources remain secure without disrupting legitimate user activity, providing adaptive security, regulatory compliance, and operational efficiency.

Question 69:

Your organization wants to monitor Microsoft 365 user activity to detect unusual or suspicious behavior, such as mass downloads of sensitive files or access from unknown locations. You also want automated remediation and alerting for security teams. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Microsoft Purview retention labels

Answer:

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is a cloud access security broker (CASB) that provides visibility into user activity across Microsoft 365 applications, detects anomalous behavior, and allows organizations to implement automated remediation and alerting.

Option A is correct because Defender for Cloud Apps can monitor activity in OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, and Exchange Online. It detects abnormal patterns, such as mass downloads, bulk sharing of sensitive documents, logins from unusual locations, or access from unmanaged devices. Policies can trigger automated remediation, such as suspending access, blocking downloads, or revoking sharing permissions. Security teams receive real-time alerts and can investigate events using detailed logs and dashboards. Integration with Microsoft Purview and DLP policies ensures sensitive content is protected even during anomalous activity. Machine learning models continuously improve anomaly detection, helping reduce false positives and enabling proactive response to threats.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device security but do not monitor user activity or detect anomalies in cloud apps.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access enforces access policies but does not provide behavioral monitoring or anomaly detection.

Option D is incorrect because Purview retention labels govern content lifecycle, not activity monitoring or threat detection.

Using Defender for Cloud Apps ensures proactive detection and remediation of suspicious activity. Administrators can define activity policies tailored to organizational needs, set severity thresholds, and implement automated actions to contain potential security incidents. Alerts provide actionable insights, enabling rapid investigation and mitigation. Dashboards and reports allow organizations to analyze trends, evaluate the effectiveness of policies, and demonstrate compliance with internal policies or regulatory frameworks. Integration with SIEM tools, such as Microsoft Sentinel, provides additional capabilities for threat correlation, incident response, and forensic analysis. This solution enables organizations to monitor, detect, and respond to risky behavior effectively, maintaining security and compliance while supporting secure collaboration in Microsoft 365.

Question 70:

Your organization wants to migrate on-premises file shares to Microsoft 365 while preserving file permissions, metadata, and version history. You also want a solution that supports incremental migration to minimize downtime. Which solution should you implement?

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with file share migration settings
B)OneDrive sync client
C)Manual copy via File Explorer
D)Azure Storage Explorer

Answer:

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with file share migration settings

Explanation:

The SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) is designed to migrate content from on-premises file shares to SharePoint Online or OneDrive for Business while preserving metadata, permissions, and version history. It supports incremental migration to minimize disruption for users.

Option A is correct because SPMT allows administrators to migrate file shares in batches, preserving folder hierarchy, permissions, timestamps, and version history. Pre-migration scanning identifies potential issues, such as unsupported characters or large files, enabling remediation before migration. Incremental migration captures changes made during the initial migration, reducing downtime and ensuring content continuity. Migration logs and reports provide administrators with detailed insights into successes, failures, and remediation steps. Scheduling migrations during off-peak hours ensures minimal operational disruption. SPMT also allows mapping of user accounts to Microsoft 365 identities, ensuring proper access control after migration.

Option B is incorrect because the OneDrive sync client only synchronizes files locally and does not preserve metadata, permissions, or version history.

Option C is incorrect because manual copy via File Explorer is error-prone, time-consuming, and does not maintain metadata or permissions.

Option D is incorrect because Azure Storage Explorer is intended for Azure Storage resources and cannot migrate on-premises file shares to Microsoft 365 efficiently.

Using SPMT ensures secure, efficient, and compliant migration of file shares. Administrators can plan incremental migrations, verify data integrity, and maintain user productivity. Permissions and ownership are preserved, enabling seamless access post-migration. Reporting and logging provide visibility into migration progress and support regulatory compliance by maintaining detailed records. Integration with Microsoft 365 security and compliance tools ensures sensitive content is protected throughout the migration. Automated scheduling and incremental updates reduce downtime and operational disruption, providing a scalable solution for migrating large volumes of on-premises files to Microsoft 365. By preserving metadata, version history, and permissions, SPMT enables organizations to maintain business continuity while transitioning to the cloud.

Question 71:

Your organization wants to prevent users from sharing sensitive documents externally via OneDrive or SharePoint, but allow internal collaboration. You also need to apply real-time alerts when a sharing attempt violates policy. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with activity alerts
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with activity alerts

Explanation:

Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) enables organizations to detect, prevent, and respond to attempts to share sensitive information across Microsoft 365 workloads. DLP policies can identify sensitive content, such as financial data, intellectual property, or personally identifiable information, and enforce restrictions or provide guidance to users through policy tips.

Option A is correct because DLP allows administrators to define rules that block external sharing of sensitive files while allowing internal collaboration. When a user attempts to share a restricted file externally, DLP can provide a warning or automatically block the action. Additionally, administrators can configure real-time alerts, which notify security teams immediately of policy violations, allowing proactive investigation and remediation. DLP integrates with Microsoft Purview auditing and reporting, giving organizations detailed insights into content violations, user behavior, and enforcement actions. Real-time monitoring and alerts enable rapid response to potential data breaches, reducing organizational risk. DLP also works alongside sensitivity labels, ensuring that classified content receives consistent protection across all applications.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device security and compliance, not content sharing policies or alerts.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access governs access based on identity, device, or location but does not inspect or enforce document-level sharing restrictions.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules manage email flow, not file sharing in SharePoint or OneDrive.

Using DLP with activity alerts ensures proactive protection of sensitive content. Administrators can create granular policies tailored to organizational needs, including exceptions for specific user groups or departments. Policy tips educate users about organizational requirements, improving awareness and compliance behavior. Security teams can analyze alerts and reports to identify trends, high-risk users, or potential policy gaps, enabling continuous improvement of data governance strategies. Integration with Microsoft Purview eDiscovery and compliance tools allows organizations to preserve and investigate content related to incidents or audits. By combining automated enforcement, real-time alerting, and detailed reporting, DLP provides a comprehensive framework for preventing data leakage while maintaining secure internal collaboration.

Question 72:

Your organization wants to detect compromised Microsoft 365 accounts and automatically enforce risk-based remediation, such as requiring password resets or blocking access. You also want detailed reporting for security monitoring. Which solution should you implement?

A)Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention labels
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Identity Protection with automated remediation policies

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection is a cloud-based identity security solution designed to detect risky user accounts, apply automated remediation, and provide detailed monitoring and reporting. It uses advanced behavioral analytics, threat intelligence, and risk detection algorithms to identify suspicious sign-ins and compromised accounts.

Option A is correct because administrators can configure automated remediation policies based on risk levels. High-risk users may be required to reset passwords, perform multi-factor authentication, or have their access temporarily blocked until the risk is mitigated. Integration with Conditional Access allows enforcement of access policies based on risk assessment, ensuring that users with elevated risk cannot access critical resources. Detailed reporting provides security teams with insights into risk trends, affected accounts, remediation actions, and policy effectiveness, supporting regulatory compliance and audit requirements. Logs can also be used for incident response and forensic investigation.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage devices and device-based security but cannot detect compromised user accounts or enforce risk-based remediation.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle and compliance, not identity security or account risk.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules only affect email flow and cannot detect or remediate risky accounts.

Using Identity Protection with automated remediation ensures proactive identity security. Administrators can configure thresholds for user and sign-in risk levels, automate actions to mitigate risk, and integrate reporting with security operations workflows. High-risk sign-ins trigger adaptive responses, reducing exposure to potential attacks and minimizing the time between detection and remediation. Risk events are logged in a central dashboard, providing visibility into account compromise patterns, user behavior anomalies, and remediation effectiveness. Security teams can investigate incidents using detailed logs and correlate events across Microsoft 365 workloads. Integration with compliance frameworks ensures that detection and remediation meet regulatory obligations, supporting GDPR, HIPAA, and SOX compliance. This proactive, automated approach reduces the likelihood of account compromise, protects sensitive organizational data, and enhances overall Microsoft 365 security posture.

Question 73:

Your organization wants to ensure all Microsoft 365 users are required to use strong passwords and multi-factor authentication (MFA). Additionally, you want to allow exceptions for trusted devices or compliant devices. Which solution should you implement?

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with MFA policies
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Microsoft Purview retention labels
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Azure AD Conditional Access with MFA policies

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access provides adaptive, policy-based authentication controls. It allows organizations to enforce strong authentication requirements, including password policies and MFA, while enabling exceptions for trusted conditions.

Option A is correct because Conditional Access policies can require MFA for all users, ensuring that strong authentication is enforced across Microsoft 365 applications. Policies can include exceptions for users signing in from trusted IP ranges, devices that meet Intune compliance policies, or applications considered low-risk. Integration with Azure AD Identity Protection enhances security by dynamically adjusting MFA requirements based on risk signals, such as suspicious sign-ins or impossible travel events. Conditional Access reporting provides insights into MFA compliance, user behavior, and enforcement effectiveness, supporting security monitoring and regulatory compliance.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies focus on device security, not authentication or MFA enforcement.

Option C is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle, not user authentication.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange Online transport rules only control email flow and cannot enforce authentication policies.

Implementing Conditional Access with MFA policies ensures strong, adaptive identity protection. Administrators can enforce strong passwords and MFA for high-risk scenarios while reducing friction for trusted users and devices. Policies can be scoped by application, user group, or risk level, providing precise control. Adaptive authentication dynamically responds to real-time threat intelligence, ensuring MFA is applied where needed most. Reporting dashboards allow administrators to monitor compliance, evaluate policy effectiveness, and identify unusual activity patterns. Integration with Identity Protection and Intune ensures that devices are evaluated for compliance before granting access. This approach aligns with zero-trust security principles, enforcing continuous verification of identity, device, and risk posture, while balancing security and usability. MFA and strong passwords provide multiple layers of defense, protecting Microsoft 365 resources from unauthorized access, credential theft, and identity-based attacks.

Question 74:

Your organization wants to migrate large volumes of on-premises SharePoint sites to SharePoint Online while preserving permissions, metadata, version history, and workflows. You also need to reduce downtime for end users and allow incremental migration. Which solution should you implement?

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with full site migration settings
B)OneDrive sync client
C)Manual export/import via File Explorer
D)Azure Storage Explorer

Answer:

A)SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) with full site migration settings

Explanation:

The SharePoint Migration Tool (SPMT) is designed to migrate content from on-premises SharePoint environments to SharePoint Online, preserving critical data attributes and supporting incremental migration.

Option A is correct because SPMT allows administrators to migrate entire sites, site collections, or document libraries while maintaining permissions, metadata, version history, and workflows. Pre-migration scans help identify issues, such as unsupported characters or file types, enabling remediation before migration. Incremental migration ensures that changes made during the migration process are captured, reducing downtime and ensuring content continuity. Administrators can schedule migrations during off-peak hours, monitor progress through detailed logs, and verify data integrity post-migration. SPMT supports mapping of users from on-premises to Microsoft 365, ensuring proper access control after migration.

Option B is incorrect because the OneDrive sync client only synchronizes files locally and cannot preserve permissions, workflows, or metadata.

Option C is incorrect because manual export/import is prone to errors, time-consuming, and does not maintain important attributes such as version history or permissions.

Option D is incorrect because Azure Storage Explorer is designed for Azure storage accounts and cannot migrate SharePoint content effectively.

Using SPMT ensures efficient, secure, and compliant migration. Administrators can stage migrations, capture incremental changes, and maintain business continuity. Permissions, workflows, and version history are preserved, reducing the risk of data loss or disruption to user productivity. Detailed reporting and logging provide transparency, enable troubleshooting, and support regulatory compliance. Integration with Microsoft 365 security and compliance tools ensures sensitive content is protected during migration. Automated scheduling and batch migration reduce operational disruption while ensuring a scalable solution for migrating large volumes of SharePoint content to the cloud. This approach provides seamless migration, minimizing downtime, and maintaining organizational workflows and compliance requirements.

Question 75:

Your organization wants to detect suspicious user activity in Microsoft 365, such as unusual file downloads, mass sharing, or access from unfamiliar locations, and trigger automated responses. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Microsoft Purview retention labels

Answer:

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is a cloud access security broker (CASB) that monitors user activity across Microsoft 365 workloads, detects anomalies, and enables automated response to potential threats.

Option A is correct because Defender for Cloud Apps can analyze user behavior in SharePoint, OneDrive, Teams, and Exchange Online. It identifies unusual activity, such as mass downloads, bulk sharing, or logins from unknown locations or devices. Administrators can configure automated remediation actions, such as suspending access, blocking downloads, revoking sharing permissions, or alerting security teams. Integration with DLP policies ensures that sensitive content remains protected even during anomalous activity. Machine learning continuously improves detection accuracy, helping to reduce false positives while providing actionable insights. Dashboards and reports allow security teams to investigate incidents, track trends, and demonstrate compliance with internal and regulatory requirements.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device security but do not detect suspicious user behavior in cloud apps.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access enforces access policies but does not provide behavioral monitoring or automated anomaly detection.

Option D is incorrect because Purview retention labels govern content lifecycle, not user activity or threat detection.

Using Defender for Cloud Apps ensures comprehensive monitoring and protection of Microsoft 365 workloads. Administrators can define policies that trigger alerts or remediation for suspicious activity. Real-time alerting allows rapid investigation and containment of potential threats. Automated responses reduce the window of exposure for compromised accounts or risky behavior, protecting sensitive information and maintaining compliance. Integration with SIEM solutions, such as Microsoft Sentinel, allows correlation of events across multiple sources for deeper investigation. Detailed reports provide insights into user activity patterns, anomalous events, and remediation outcomes, supporting continuous improvement in security posture. By combining anomaly detection, automated remediation, and comprehensive reporting, organizations can maintain secure collaboration and protect sensitive data across Microsoft 365 while minimizing the impact on legitimate users.

Question 76:

Your organization wants to implement a solution that automatically classifies and protects sensitive emails in Exchange Online based on content, such as financial information or PII. You also want to prevent these emails from being sent externally unless authorized. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with policy tips
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Microsoft Purview retention labels

Answer:

A)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with policy tips

Explanation:

Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides organizations with the ability to automatically detect and protect sensitive information in emails, documents, and chat messages. By inspecting content in Exchange Online, administrators can enforce policies that prevent accidental or unauthorized sharing of sensitive data while educating users on proper compliance practices.

Option A is correct because DLP policies can identify sensitive content, such as financial data, personally identifiable information (PII), or intellectual property, and enforce rules on email transmission. These rules can automatically block or restrict emails containing sensitive content from being sent externally unless specific conditions are met, such as approval workflows or exceptions for authorized recipients. Policy tips notify users in real-time, providing guidance and reducing the risk of unintentional data leaks. Administrators can also generate comprehensive reports showing attempted policy violations, enforcement actions, and user behavior patterns, supporting regulatory compliance and internal audits.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device security, not email content inspection or protection.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access controls access based on identity, device compliance, or location but does not inspect email content.

Option D is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle and retention, not real-time content protection or sharing restrictions.

Implementing DLP with policy tips ensures proactive protection of sensitive emails. Administrators can define granular policies for specific users, groups, or departments, reducing risk while maintaining operational efficiency. Automated enforcement eliminates reliance on user judgment, while policy tips educate users on compliance best practices. Detailed auditing and reporting provide visibility into attempts to send sensitive data externally, allowing security teams to monitor trends, identify high-risk users, and refine policies over time. DLP integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Purview compliance tools, sensitivity labels, and eDiscovery, enabling organizations to maintain regulatory compliance while minimizing the risk of data breaches. By combining real-time enforcement, user education, and robust reporting, DLP ensures sensitive emails are protected without impeding business workflows, maintaining a balance between security and productivity.

Question 77:

Your organization wants to enforce device-based access to Microsoft 365 applications, ensuring that only compliant devices can access resources. Non-compliant devices should be blocked. Which solution should you implement?

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access
B)Microsoft Purview retention labels
C)Exchange Online transport rules
D)Microsoft 365 Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Answer:

A)Intune device compliance policies integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Microsoft Intune allows organizations to define device compliance policies, including requirements for encryption, antivirus, OS version, and firewall settings. When integrated with Azure AD Conditional Access, these policies ensure that only compliant devices can access Microsoft 365 resources.

Option A is correct because Conditional Access evaluates device compliance in real-time before granting access to applications such as Teams, SharePoint, or Exchange Online. Non-compliant devices can be automatically blocked or required to remediate issues before access is allowed. Compliance policies can include detailed criteria, such as device health checks, operating system versions, and security configurations. Reporting provides administrators with visibility into device compliance trends, remediation actions, and user behavior. This approach aligns with zero-trust principles, ensuring access is conditional based on the device’s security posture and reducing the risk of unauthorized access or data leakage.

Option B is incorrect because Purview retention labels govern content lifecycle and retention, not device access.

Option C is incorrect because Exchange transport rules only manage email flow and cannot enforce device-based access controls.

Option D is incorrect because DLP focuses on protecting sensitive content, not device compliance or access.

Using Intune compliance policies with Conditional Access ensures secure and managed access to Microsoft 365 resources. Administrators can define multiple compliance checks and enforce access restrictions dynamically. Non-compliant devices can be automatically guided through remediation, reducing operational friction. Dashboards provide insights into device compliance trends, enforcement actions, and areas of risk, enabling continuous improvement of security posture. Integration with other security and compliance tools enhances visibility and control over organizational devices. This approach supports regulatory compliance, protects sensitive data, and ensures that only secure, compliant devices can access Microsoft 365 resources, providing a comprehensive and adaptive security strategy for the enterprise.

Question 78:

Your organization wants to migrate on-premises Microsoft Exchange mailboxes to Microsoft 365 while maintaining mailbox permissions, calendar sharing, and message classifications. You also want minimal disruption for end users. Which solution should you implement?

A)Hybrid Exchange migration with mailbox migration tool
B)Cutover migration
C)IMAP migration
D)Manual export/import via PST

Answer:

A)Hybrid Exchange migration with mailbox migration tool

Explanation:

Hybrid Exchange migration enables organizations to migrate mailboxes from on-premises Exchange servers to Exchange Online while maintaining mailbox features such as permissions, calendar sharing, message classifications, and other settings.

Option A is correct because hybrid migration allows for staged or incremental migration, ensuring that users can continue accessing their mailboxes during the migration process. Permissions, delegate access, and calendar sharing are preserved, providing a seamless transition. Administrators can migrate mailboxes in batches, monitor progress using detailed logs, and verify data integrity after migration. Hybrid configurations enable coexistence between on-premises and cloud environments, allowing users to interact with both systems while migration occurs. Migration tools map user accounts, ensure proper access, and maintain compliance with internal and regulatory policies. Pre-migration analysis helps identify potential issues, such as oversized mailboxes or invalid addresses, while post-migration reports confirm successful migration and highlight exceptions.

Option B is incorrect because cutover migration moves all mailboxes at once, which can cause significant downtime and is unsuitable for large organizations.

Option C is incorrect because IMAP migration only transfers email messages and does not preserve calendars, contacts, permissions, or message classifications.

Option D is incorrect because manual PST export/import is time-consuming, error-prone, and cannot maintain mailbox features.

Using a hybrid Exchange migration ensures minimal disruption, compliance, and operational continuity. Administrators can stage mailbox migration, monitor progress, and address exceptions proactively. Calendar sharing, delegate permissions, and message classifications are preserved, maintaining business continuity. Migration logs provide insight into successful and failed migrations, supporting troubleshooting and auditing. Coexistence during migration ensures that users have uninterrupted access to mailboxes while administrative tasks are performed. Integration with security and compliance tools ensures that migrated mailboxes adhere to organizational policies and regulatory requirements. Incremental migration reduces downtime and allows for verification of migrated content, making hybrid migration the preferred approach for large-scale mailbox transitions to Microsoft 365. This method balances efficiency, security, and user experience, providing a controlled, compliant, and seamless migration strategy.

Question 79:

Your organization wants to implement Microsoft 365 retention policies to automatically retain Teams channel messages for a defined period, prevent deletion during retention, and allow auditing for compliance purposes. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Purview retention policies and labels
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Exchange Online transport rules

Answer:

A)Microsoft Purview retention policies and labels

Explanation:

Microsoft Purview retention policies enable organizations to manage the lifecycle of content, including Teams channel messages, ensuring compliance and audit readiness. These policies help organizations retain messages for regulatory periods, prevent deletion, and allow comprehensive monitoring.

Option A is correct because retention policies can be applied to Teams messages, both in channels and private chats. Administrators can configure retention periods based on organizational or regulatory requirements, such as three, five, or seven years. During the retention period, messages cannot be deleted, ensuring that information remains accessible for audits or eDiscovery purposes. Retention labels can be applied automatically to classify content and enforce retention consistently. Purview reporting provides visibility into policy application, retention status, and audit trails, supporting internal governance and external compliance with frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, or SOX. Automated retention ensures consistency, reduces human error, and provides a clear audit path for all Teams messages.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies enforce device security, not content retention or auditing.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access controls access based on identity and device compliance but does not enforce content retention.

Option D is incorrect because Exchange transport rules manage email flow and do not apply to Teams messages or retention.

Implementing Purview retention policies ensures consistent and auditable content management. Administrators can scope policies to specific users, teams, or channels, providing granular control over message retention. Automated application of retention labels ensures compliance without relying on manual actions. Detailed audit logs capture every retention action, enabling transparency for internal governance or regulatory audits. Integration with eDiscovery allows organizations to search, preserve, and analyze messages during legal investigations or compliance reviews. By preventing deletion and maintaining detailed records of message activity, retention policies support operational continuity, secure collaboration, and compliance with organizational and regulatory obligations. This approach provides robust governance over Teams communications, maintaining a balance between collaboration and compliance.

Question 80:

Your organization wants to monitor user activity in Microsoft 365 to detect unusual behavior, such as mass downloads of sensitive files or access from unfamiliar locations, and trigger automated responses to mitigate risks. Which solution should you implement?

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)
B)Intune compliance policies
C)Azure AD Conditional Access
D)Microsoft Purview retention labels

Answer:

A)Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps (Cloud App Security)

Explanation:

Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps is a cloud access security broker (CASB) that monitors user activity across Microsoft 365 workloads, detects anomalous behavior, and enables automated remediation and alerting.

Option A is correct because Defender for Cloud Apps can analyze user activity in OneDrive, SharePoint, Teams, and Exchange Online. It identifies unusual patterns, such as mass file downloads, bulk sharing, or logins from unknown devices or locations. Administrators can configure automated remediation, such as revoking access, blocking downloads, or alerting security teams. Integration with Microsoft Purview DLP policies ensures sensitive content remains protected even during anomalous activity. Machine learning models continuously refine anomaly detection, reducing false positives while providing actionable insights. Detailed dashboards and reports enable security teams to investigate incidents, analyze trends, and demonstrate regulatory compliance.

Option B is incorrect because Intune compliance policies manage device security but do not monitor user activity or detect anomalies in cloud applications.

Option C is incorrect because Conditional Access enforces access policies but does not provide behavior monitoring or automated anomaly detection.

Option D is incorrect because Purview retention labels manage content lifecycle and retention, not user activity monitoring or threat response.

Using Defender for Cloud Apps ensures proactive threat detection and mitigation. Administrators can define activity policies and configure real-time alerts or automated actions. Suspicious behavior is immediately addressed, reducing exposure and protecting sensitive data. Integration with SIEM solutions, such as Microsoft Sentinel, allows correlation of events across multiple sources for deeper analysis. Reports provide insights into user behavior, policy violations, and remediation outcomes, supporting continuous improvement of security posture. Automated response capabilities reduce the risk window and help maintain compliance, while dashboards enable security teams to monitor activity trends and potential threats. Defender for Cloud Apps provides a comprehensive solution for securing Microsoft 365 workloads against insider threats, compromised accounts, and risky behavior, ensuring secure collaboration and regulatory compliance.