Amazon  AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer – Associate MLA-C01   Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q 161- 180

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer – Associate MLA-C01 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 161

A bank wants to predict loan defaults using historical loan data, including customer demographics, credit scores, and payment history. The dataset is large, highly imbalanced, and the bank requires high recall to minimize missed defaults. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) XGBoost is the most suitable choice for predicting loan defaults due to its ability to handle large, complex datasets with high-dimensional features. It is a gradient boosting algorithm that builds an ensemble of decision trees to capture non-linear relationships and interactions between features, which are common in loan datasets. XGBoost supports weighted classes and the scale_pos_weight parameter to handle imbalanced datasets effectively, which is crucial in default prediction where the positive class (defaults) is rare.

High recall is critical in this scenario because missing a default can have serious financial implications. XGBoost allows optimization of evaluation metrics such as AUC, F1-score, or recall, and threshold tuning can be used to maximize sensitivity to defaults while controlling false positives. Feature importance generated by XGBoost provides interpretability, allowing the bank to identify which factors, such as credit score, payment history, or income, contribute most to defaults. SageMaker enables distributed training for large datasets and provides endpoints for batch or real-time inference to integrate with loan approval workflows.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised linear model suitable for classification. While it can handle large datasets and provides interpretability through linear coefficients, it may underfit when feature interactions are non-linear. High-dimensional datasets with categorical features may not be fully captured by a linear model, reducing predictive accuracy and recall compared to XGBoost.

C) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. While it could detect unusual loan applications, it cannot leverage labeled defaults to predict future outcomes. RCF cannot optimize recall for supervised classification, making it unsuitable for predicting loan defaults.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. It cannot predict default probability for individual customers. Clustering may identify groups with similar behavior but does not provide actionable predictions for risk assessment.

Hence, XGBoost is optimal for high-recall, supervised loan default prediction with interpretability and scalability.

Question 162

A healthcare provider wants to forecast patient demand in multiple departments using historical admission data, holidays, and local events. They require probabilistic forecasts to plan staffing efficiently. Which SageMaker algorithm should they use?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the ideal choice for probabilistic forecasting of patient demand in multiple departments. Healthcare admissions are temporal data with seasonality, trends, and external factors such as holidays or local events. DeepAR uses recurrent neural networks to model temporal dependencies and captures patterns across multiple related time series, such as different hospital departments or locations.

Probabilistic forecasts are essential for healthcare staffing because they allow planners to understand the range of expected patient arrivals, preparing for peak demand while minimizing overstaffing during low periods. DeepAR outputs quantile forecasts, providing actionable confidence intervals for operational planning. It also allows the incorporation of categorical covariates, such as department ID or hospital location, as well as continuous external features like temperature or local event counts. SageMaker’s managed infrastructure ensures scalable training and inference for large datasets and complex multi-series models.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification algorithm. While it can predict numeric outcomes, it does not naturally model temporal dependencies, seasonal patterns, or external covariates over multiple time series. Using Linear Learner would likely underfit the data and fail to produce probabilistic forecasts, limiting its usefulness for operational planning.

C) XGBoost is a supervised regression algorithm for tabular data. While it can approximate time series predictions using engineered features such as lagged values or rolling averages, it does not provide native temporal modeling or probabilistic outputs. Feature engineering at the scale of multiple departments and time series is complex and error-prone.

D) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. It cannot forecast patient demand, trends, or provide uncertainty intervals. Its use would be limited to detecting unusual spikes in admissions but not for proactive planning.

Therefore, DeepAR is the best choice for scalable, probabilistic forecasting of multi-series patient demand in healthcare.

Question 163

A financial services firm wants to detect unusual trading activity in real time using unlabeled multi-dimensional transaction data. The dataset is high-dimensional, and timely detection is critical to prevent fraud. Which SageMaker algorithm should they use?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest (RCF) is designed for unsupervised anomaly detection in high-dimensional datasets. In financial trading, anomalies could represent fraudulent transactions or irregular market behavior. RCF constructs an ensemble of random trees to isolate points that deviate significantly from normal patterns, assigning high anomaly scores to unusual transactions.

RCF does not require labeled anomalies, which is important because fraudulent events are rare and often unlabeled. It scales efficiently for high-dimensional data and supports real-time streaming detection, making it suitable for financial applications where immediate action is necessary. SageMaker manages the training and inference infrastructure, allowing continuous monitoring and alerting for unusual activity.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm that requires labeled data. Without labeled fraudulent transactions, XGBoost cannot be applied for anomaly detection. Using synthetic labels may introduce bias and reduce reliability.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised model for regression or classification. Without labeled anomalies, it cannot detect unusual transactions. It is not appropriate for unsupervised real-time fraud detection.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. While it can group similar transactions, it is less effective than RCF for high-dimensional data and does not provide scalable anomaly scoring. K-Means assumes spherical clusters and equal variance, which may not represent complex patterns in trading data.

Therefore, Random Cut Forest is optimal for real-time, scalable, unsupervised anomaly detection in financial transactions.

Question 164

A retailer wants to segment customers based on purchase frequency, average order value, and product preferences for personalized marketing campaigns. No labeled segments exist. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) K-Means is the most suitable algorithm for unsupervised customer segmentation. It groups customers into clusters based on similarity across multiple features such as purchase frequency, average order value, and product preferences. Clusters can be used to design targeted marketing strategies, such as loyalty programs for high-value customers or engagement campaigns for infrequent buyers.

K-Means minimizes within-cluster variance and allows specifying the number of clusters according to business requirements or using methods like the elbow method to determine the optimal cluster count. SageMaker supports distributed K-Means training, enabling scalable processing of large customer datasets. The resulting clusters provide actionable insights for marketing campaigns without requiring labeled data.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm for classification or regression. Without labels for customer segments, it cannot perform clustering. Using Linear Learner would not produce meaningful segmentation.

C) XGBoost is a supervised learning algorithm. It requires labeled data to predict target variables and is unsuitable for unsupervised segmentation tasks.

D) DeepAR is a time-series forecasting algorithm. Customer segmentation does not involve temporal forecasting; DeepAR is irrelevant for this use case.

Hence, K-Means is optimal for unsupervised customer segmentation and actionable marketing insights.

Question 165

A telecommunications company wants to predict network failures using historical network metrics such as latency, packet loss, and traffic load. The dataset is labeled with failure events, and high recall is required to minimize missed failures. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
C) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) XGBoost is the most appropriate choice for predicting network failures using labeled historical metrics. XGBoost is a gradient boosting algorithm capable of modeling complex non-linear relationships between features such as latency, packet loss, traffic load, and device-specific characteristics. High recall is critical in network failure prediction to ensure that potential failures are detected and mitigated proactively.

XGBoost allows for tuning of evaluation metrics, thresholds, and class weights to prioritize recall without excessively compromising precision. The algorithm also provides feature importance scores, helping network engineers identify which metrics contribute most to failures. SageMaker facilitates scalable distributed training and supports both real-time and batch inference, making it practical for continuous monitoring of network health.

B) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. Without labels, it cannot predict failures, and clustering results would not directly indicate the likelihood of network issues.

C) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. While it could flag unusual network behavior, it cannot leverage labeled failure data to optimize recall for supervised prediction.

D) DeepAR is a probabilistic time-series forecasting algorithm. Predicting failures is a classification problem rather than a sequential forecast, so DeepAR is not suitable for this task.

Therefore, XGBoost provides the best combination of supervised learning, high recall, feature interpretability, and scalability for predicting network failures.

Question 166

A logistics company wants to forecast daily package delivery volumes for multiple regions. The dataset includes historical delivery counts, regional holidays, and weather conditions. Probabilistic forecasts are required to optimize staffing and routing. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the most appropriate choice for probabilistic forecasting of daily package delivery volumes. Logistics data is a multi-series time series problem with trends, seasonality, and external covariates such as holidays and weather. DeepAR uses recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to model temporal dependencies and captures complex relationships across multiple related time series, such as different regions or distribution centers.

Probabilistic forecasts are essential in logistics because they provide a range of expected delivery volumes, enabling planners to manage staffing, vehicle allocation, and routing efficiently. DeepAR outputs quantile forecasts, which allow decision-makers to prepare for high-demand scenarios while minimizing idle resources. It supports categorical features like region IDs and continuous covariates such as temperature or precipitation, enhancing forecast accuracy. SageMaker’s managed infrastructure ensures scalable training and inference for large datasets with many regions.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification algorithm. While it can predict numeric outcomes, it cannot naturally capture temporal dependencies or seasonal trends, limiting its ability to forecast delivery volumes accurately. Linear models also do not provide probabilistic outputs for planning under uncertainty.

C) XGBoost is a supervised regression algorithm. Although it can approximate time-series predictions through feature engineering (lags, rolling averages, encoded holidays), it does not inherently model sequences or trends and produces point estimates rather than probabilistic forecasts. Scaling XGBoost for multiple regions with thousands of time series is complex and less efficient than DeepAR.

D) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. While it could detect unusual delivery patterns, it cannot generate forecasts or quantify uncertainty, making it unsuitable for planning and staffing optimization.

Thus, DeepAR is the optimal algorithm for multi-series probabilistic forecasting of daily package delivery volumes considering seasonality, trends, and external factors.

Question 167

A financial institution wants to predict credit card fraud using structured transaction data. The dataset is highly imbalanced (fraud < 1%) and includes features like transaction amount, location, and merchant type. They require a model with high recall. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) XGBoost is the most suitable algorithm for credit card fraud prediction. Fraud detection is a supervised classification problem with high-dimensional tabular data and severe class imbalance. XGBoost’s gradient boosting framework allows it to model complex, non-linear relationships between features, such as the interaction between transaction amount, merchant type, and location.

High recall is critical in fraud detection to minimize the number of undetected fraudulent transactions. XGBoost allows optimization of evaluation metrics such as AUC, F1-score, and recall. Additionally, the scale_pos_weight parameter or custom loss functions can handle class imbalance effectively. Feature importance analysis in XGBoost helps financial analysts understand which transaction attributes contribute most to fraud, supporting investigation and regulatory compliance. SageMaker facilitates distributed training and real-time inference, allowing deployment of high-performing models at scale for immediate fraud detection.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm suitable for regression or classification. While it provides interpretability, it cannot capture complex non-linear interactions between features effectively, which reduces predictive performance in highly imbalanced fraud datasets. Handling class imbalance is possible but less flexible than in XGBoost.

C) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. It can detect unusual transactions but cannot optimize recall for labeled fraud events. RCF may produce many false positives and is less effective for structured transactional data with known fraud labels.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. While it can group similar transactions, it cannot provide direct predictions or high-recall classification for fraud detection. Clustering is insufficient for supervised risk assessment.

Hence, XGBoost is optimal for supervised, high-recall fraud detection with feature interpretability and scalable deployment.

Question 168

A retailer wants to segment customers based on purchase behavior for targeted promotions. Data includes purchase frequency, order value, and product categories, with no labeled segments available. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) K-Means is the most suitable algorithm for unsupervised customer segmentation. It partitions customers into clusters based on similarity across features such as purchase frequency, average order value, and product categories. Each cluster represents a segment with shared behavior, enabling targeted marketing campaigns or personalized offers.

K-Means minimizes intra-cluster variance and allows the business to select the number of clusters based on operational requirements or methods like the elbow method. SageMaker supports distributed K-Means training for large datasets, making it scalable for retailers with millions of customers. Clusters can be interpreted to design actionable marketing strategies, such as loyalty rewards for high-value clusters or retention campaigns for low-frequency buyers.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification algorithm. Without labels for customer segments, it cannot perform clustering. Using Linear Learner would not produce meaningful segments.

C) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm. It requires labeled data to predict outcomes and cannot perform unsupervised segmentation. While it is powerful for prediction tasks, it is irrelevant in this unsupervised context.

D) DeepAR is a probabilistic time-series forecasting algorithm. Customer segmentation does not involve forecasting; therefore, DeepAR is not applicable.

Thus, K-Means is optimal for unsupervised segmentation and actionable customer insights in retail.

Question 169

A telecommunications company wants to predict network failures using historical metrics such as latency, packet loss, and traffic load. The dataset is labeled with failure events, and minimizing missed failures (high recall) is critical. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
C) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) XGBoost is the most appropriate algorithm for predicting network failures in labeled, multi-dimensional datasets. Network failures involve complex interactions between metrics like latency, packet loss, and traffic load. XGBoost’s gradient boosting trees capture these non-linear relationships effectively.

High recall is crucial to detect as many potential failures as possible, preventing downtime and service disruption. XGBoost allows threshold tuning and class weighting to prioritize recall. Feature importance scores provide insight into which metrics contribute most to failures, aiding network engineers in preventive measures. SageMaker enables distributed training, allowing scalable model development for large datasets, and supports real-time inference for continuous monitoring of network health.

B) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm and cannot predict failures with labeled data. Clustering might group similar metrics but would not provide actionable predictions or high recall.

C) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. It can identify unusual network patterns but cannot utilize labeled failure events to optimize recall. It is less precise than a supervised approach for predicting failures.

D) DeepAR is a time-series forecasting algorithm. Network failure prediction is a classification problem rather than temporal forecasting, making DeepAR unsuitable.

Hence, XGBoost is optimal for high-recall, interpretable, and scalable network failure prediction.

Question 170

A logistics company wants to detect unusual delivery patterns across multiple distribution centers using structured shipment data. The dataset is unlabeled and multi-dimensional. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest is the ideal algorithm for unsupervised anomaly detection in multi-dimensional logistics datasets. It identifies unusual delivery patterns, such as delayed shipments, unusual volumes, or unexpected routing, by assigning anomaly scores to data points that differ significantly from the normal distribution.

RCF does not require labeled anomalies, which is important because unusual delivery patterns are rare and unpredictable. It is scalable to high-dimensional datasets across multiple distribution centers. SageMaker supports both batch and real-time inference, allowing continuous monitoring and alerting for abnormal patterns. RCF adapts to evolving data distributions, which is essential in logistics operations that may change daily or seasonally.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm that requires labeled anomalies for training. Without labeled data, it cannot detect unusual delivery patterns.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised classification or regression algorithm. It cannot be used effectively for unlabeled anomaly detection.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. While it can group deliveries into clusters, it is less effective at identifying rare anomalies in high-dimensional data. K-Means assumes spherical clusters and may misidentify normal variations as anomalies.

Therefore, Random Cut Forest is optimal for unsupervised detection of unusual delivery patterns in multi-dimensional, unlabeled logistics datasets.

Question 171

A retail company wants to forecast daily sales for multiple stores and products. The dataset includes historical sales, promotions, holidays, and local events. The company requires probabilistic forecasts to optimize inventory and staffing. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the most appropriate algorithm for forecasting daily sales across multiple stores and products. Sales forecasting is a multi-series time-series problem where temporal dependencies, seasonality, trends, and external covariates such as promotions and holidays play a crucial role. DeepAR utilizes recurrent neural networks to model these sequential dependencies, capturing patterns that traditional regression models cannot.

The requirement for probabilistic forecasts makes DeepAR ideal because it generates quantile estimates, providing confidence intervals for predictions. Probabilistic outputs allow the company to plan inventory and staffing with a clear understanding of uncertainty, reducing the risk of stockouts or overstaffing. DeepAR also supports categorical covariates (store ID, product category) and continuous features (promotion intensity, local weather), enhancing the model’s ability to capture complex influences on sales. SageMaker’s managed infrastructure ensures efficient, scalable training for large datasets containing thousands of stores and products.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised regression algorithm. While it can predict numeric values, it does not inherently model temporal dependencies, seasonality, or trends across multiple related time series. It also does not provide probabilistic outputs, which are essential for managing inventory under uncertainty. Linear models would likely underfit the sales data due to their inability to capture complex non-linear patterns.

C) XGBoost is a powerful supervised learning algorithm for tabular data. It can predict sales using engineered features like lags, rolling averages, and encoded dates. However, it produces point estimates and does not inherently provide probabilistic forecasts. Scaling XGBoost to thousands of products and stores while generating reliable forecasts is complex, and the model cannot naturally learn temporal dependencies without extensive feature engineering.

D) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. It can identify unusual spikes or drops in sales but cannot predict future sales or provide probabilistic forecasts. Its application in this scenario is limited to detecting anomalies rather than generating actionable forecasts.

Therefore, DeepAR is optimal for scalable, multi-series, probabilistic sales forecasting with temporal dependencies, seasonality, trends, and external covariates.

Question 172

A financial institution wants to detect fraudulent credit card transactions in real time. The dataset includes transaction amount, location, merchant type, and timestamp. Labeled fraud examples are limited. Which SageMaker algorithm should they use?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest (RCF) is the most suitable algorithm for real-time, unsupervised fraud detection with limited labeled data. RCF identifies anomalies by isolating points that deviate significantly from the distribution of normal transactions. It constructs an ensemble of random trees, where unusual transactions are more easily isolated, producing higher anomaly scores.

The algorithm does not require labeled data, making it ideal for fraud detection, where fraudulent examples are rare and often unavailable for training. RCF can handle high-dimensional inputs, such as transaction amount, merchant type, location, and timestamp, providing scalable detection for large volumes of real-time transactions. SageMaker facilitates deployment of RCF models for streaming detection, triggering alerts when anomalies occur.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm that requires labeled fraud examples. Limited labels make it difficult to train a reliable model, and synthetic labeling may introduce bias. XGBoost excels in structured supervised learning but is not ideal for unlabeled anomaly detection.

C) Linear Learner is also a supervised algorithm. Without sufficient labeled fraud cases, it cannot reliably detect unusual transactions. It may underperform in detecting complex non-linear patterns indicative of fraud.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. While it can group similar transactions, it is less effective for high-dimensional anomaly detection and may misclassify normal variability as fraudulent. Unlike RCF, it does not provide robust anomaly scoring.

Therefore, Random Cut Forest is optimal for scalable, unsupervised, real-time anomaly detection in credit card transactions with limited labels.

Question 173

A telecommunications company wants to segment its customers based on usage patterns, including call duration, data usage, and roaming behavior. No labeled segments are available. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) K-Means is the most suitable algorithm for unsupervised customer segmentation. It partitions customers into clusters based on similarity in usage patterns, such as call duration, data consumption, and roaming behavior. Each cluster represents a natural segment, enabling personalized marketing, targeted offers, or loyalty programs.

K-Means minimizes intra-cluster variance, creating homogeneous groups that share behavior. The company can specify the number of clusters based on operational needs or use the elbow method to determine the optimal number. SageMaker supports distributed training for large datasets, making it scalable to millions of customers. Clustering results provide actionable insights for business strategy, allowing better targeting of high-value or at-risk customers.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification algorithm. Without labeled segment data, it cannot perform clustering or segmentation effectively.

C) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm that requires labeled outcomes. In the absence of labeled customer segments, it cannot be applied for segmentation.

D) DeepAR is a probabilistic time-series forecasting algorithm. Customer segmentation is not a temporal forecasting task, so DeepAR is not applicable.

Thus, K-Means is optimal for unsupervised customer segmentation in telecommunications, providing actionable clusters for marketing and retention strategies.

Question 174

A healthcare provider wants to forecast hospital bed occupancy for multiple departments using historical admissions, holidays, and local events. Probabilistic forecasts are needed for staffing optimization. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the most appropriate algorithm for probabilistic forecasting of hospital bed occupancy. Healthcare admission data is a multi-series time series with trends, seasonality, and external covariates such as holidays, local events, and patient demographics. DeepAR uses recurrent neural networks to capture temporal dependencies and patterns across multiple departments or locations.

Probabilistic forecasts are critical in healthcare staffing because they provide not only expected occupancy but also confidence intervals, allowing hospital administrators to prepare for peak periods without overstaffing. DeepAR supports categorical covariates (department, hospital ID) and continuous features (temperature, local events) to improve forecast accuracy. SageMaker’s managed infrastructure enables scalable training and inference for large datasets with many departments.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm for regression. It does not capture temporal dependencies or seasonality effectively, limiting its accuracy for multi-series forecasts. Linear Learner also cannot generate probabilistic outputs, which are essential for uncertainty-aware staffing.

C) XGBoost is a supervised regression algorithm. While it can model complex patterns in tabular data, it requires extensive feature engineering for time-series forecasting, does not naturally capture sequential dependencies, and produces point estimates rather than probabilistic forecasts.

D) Random Cut Forest is an anomaly detection algorithm. While it can detect unusual occupancy patterns, it cannot predict future bed occupancy or provide probabilistic intervals for planning.

Therefore, DeepAR is optimal for multi-series probabilistic forecasting of hospital bed occupancy with trends, seasonality, and external covariates.

Question 175

A logistics company wants to detect unusual shipment patterns across multiple distribution centers. The dataset is multi-dimensional, unlabeled, and high-volume. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest (RCF) is the most suitable algorithm for detecting unusual shipment patterns in unlabeled, high-dimensional logistics datasets. RCF identifies data points that deviate from normal patterns by assigning anomaly scores. Shipments with abnormal volumes, delayed timings, or irregular routing receive higher scores, allowing the company to investigate potential operational issues or fraud.

RCF does not require labeled anomalies, making it ideal for real-world logistics where unusual patterns are rare and unpredictable. It scales efficiently for large datasets and supports both batch and real-time detection. SageMaker provides managed infrastructure for training and deployment, enabling continuous monitoring across multiple distribution centers. RCF also adapts to evolving data patterns, which is crucial in logistics operations that vary seasonally or due to external factors.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm requiring labeled anomalies. Without labels, it cannot detect unusual shipment patterns effectively.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification model. It is unsuitable for unlabeled anomaly detection and would not provide actionable anomaly scores.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. While it can group shipments, it is less effective for detecting rare anomalies in high-dimensional data. Clusters may not capture abnormal events accurately, and K-Means assumes equal variance, which may not hold in logistics datasets.

Therefore, Random Cut Forest is optimal for scalable, unsupervised anomaly detection of unusual shipment patterns in logistics.

Question 176

A company wants to predict the energy consumption of multiple buildings to optimize HVAC operations. The dataset includes hourly energy usage, weather data, and occupancy levels. Probabilistic forecasts are required to manage peak loads efficiently. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the most suitable algorithm for predicting energy consumption in buildings. Energy usage is inherently a multi-series time-series problem with trends, seasonality, and dependencies on external factors like weather and occupancy. DeepAR, which is a recurrent neural network-based forecasting model, can model these temporal dependencies effectively. It captures patterns across multiple buildings, allowing shared learning and improved accuracy for buildings with sparse historical data.

Probabilistic forecasting is critical in this scenario because energy planners need to anticipate peak loads and potential variability. DeepAR produces quantile forecasts, giving confidence intervals that help facility managers optimize HVAC scheduling and reduce energy costs. It also accommodates categorical covariates such as building ID and continuous features like temperature, humidity, or occupancy levels. Using SageMaker for DeepAR allows scalable training and deployment for multiple buildings simultaneously.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised linear regression algorithm that predicts numeric values but cannot naturally capture temporal dependencies, seasonal trends, or multi-series correlations. It would underfit the data, producing inaccurate predictions and no probabilistic outputs for managing uncertainty.

C) XGBoost is a gradient boosting algorithm for tabular data. While it could be applied with extensive feature engineering (lag variables, rolling averages, encoded timestamps), it produces point estimates and lacks native probabilistic forecasting, limiting its usefulness in energy management.

D) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. It identifies unusual patterns but cannot forecast energy consumption or provide actionable probabilistic outputs for optimization.

Therefore, DeepAR is optimal for multi-building, probabilistic energy forecasting with trends, seasonality, and external covariates.

 

Question 177

A financial company wants to detect unusual trading activities indicative of fraud using high-dimensional transactional data. The dataset is unlabeled and requires real-time detection. Which SageMaker algorithm should they use?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest (RCF) is ideal for unsupervised anomaly detection in high-dimensional, unlabeled trading data. RCF isolates unusual points by constructing an ensemble of random trees and calculating anomaly scores. Transactions that deviate significantly from normal patterns, such as irregular amounts, unusual locations, or atypical frequency, receive high anomaly scores, enabling real-time fraud detection.

RCF does not require labeled data, which is crucial since fraudulent activities are rare and may not have ground-truth labels. It scales well to high-dimensional data and supports streaming inference for immediate alerts. SageMaker’s managed environment allows deploying RCF models for continuous monitoring across numerous trading accounts. RCF adapts to evolving data distributions, ensuring the system remains effective as trading patterns change.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm requiring labeled fraud examples. With limited labels, it is difficult to train an effective model, and synthetic labeling may reduce accuracy. XGBoost excels in structured supervised learning but is not ideal for unlabeled anomaly detection.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification model and cannot effectively detect anomalies in unlabeled datasets. Without labels, it cannot optimize detection performance.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. While it can group similar transactions, it does not provide robust anomaly scoring and may misclassify rare but legitimate patterns as anomalies.

Thus, Random Cut Forest is optimal for scalable, unsupervised, real-time anomaly detection in financial transactions.

Question 178

A retailer wants to segment customers based on shopping behavior, including purchase frequency, order value, and product preferences. No labeled segments exist. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) K-Means is the most suitable algorithm for unsupervised customer segmentation. It groups customers into clusters based on similarity in features such as purchase frequency, average order value, and product preferences. Each cluster represents a distinct customer segment that can be targeted for personalized marketing campaigns, loyalty programs, or retention initiatives.

K-Means minimizes within-cluster variance and allows the business to determine the number of clusters based on operational goals or using the elbow method. SageMaker supports distributed training for large datasets, making it scalable for retailers with millions of customers. The resulting clusters provide actionable insights to improve revenue and customer engagement.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm for classification or regression. Without labeled segments, it cannot perform clustering or generate meaningful segmentation results.

C) XGBoost is a supervised learning algorithm. It requires labeled data to predict target outcomes and cannot perform unsupervised segmentation. While powerful for prediction, it is irrelevant in this unsupervised clustering scenario.

D) DeepAR is a probabilistic time-series forecasting algorithm. Customer segmentation is not a time-series problem, so DeepAR is not applicable.

Therefore, K-Means is optimal for unsupervised customer segmentation, enabling actionable insights and targeted marketing strategies.

Question 179

A telecommunications company wants to predict network failures using historical metrics such as latency, packet loss, and traffic load. Labeled failure events are available, and high recall is required to minimize missed failures. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
C) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) XGBoost is the most appropriate choice for predicting network failures in labeled datasets. Network failure prediction is a classification problem where latency, packet loss, and traffic load interact in complex non-linear ways. XGBoost, a gradient boosting algorithm, can capture these interactions effectively and optimize for high recall, ensuring that most failures are detected.

High recall is crucial to prevent downtime and service disruptions. XGBoost allows tuning of evaluation metrics, class weights, and thresholds to prioritize recall. Feature importance scores provide insights into which network metrics contribute most to failures, helping engineers prioritize monitoring and preventive actions. SageMaker supports distributed training for large-scale datasets and provides real-time inference for continuous monitoring of network health.

B) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. Without labels, it cannot predict failures or optimize recall. Clustering may group similar network states but does not provide actionable classification.

C) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. While it can detect unusual network behavior, it cannot leverage labeled data to optimize recall for failure prediction. It is less precise than a supervised approach.

D) DeepAR is a time-series forecasting algorithm. Network failure prediction is a classification task, not a forecasting problem, making DeepAR unsuitable.

Hence, XGBoost is optimal for high-recall, interpretable, and scalable network failure prediction.

Question 180

A logistics company wants to detect unusual shipment patterns across multiple distribution centers using multi-dimensional, unlabeled data. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest (RCF) is the ideal algorithm for detecting unusual shipment patterns in unlabeled, high-dimensional logistics datasets. The core strength of RCF lies in its ability to calculate anomaly scores for each data point by isolating points that deviate significantly from the normal distribution of data. In logistics, shipments may vary by numerous factors such as volume, weight, destination, delivery time, route taken, carrier performance, and environmental conditions like temperature and humidity. RCF is able to analyze all these dimensions simultaneously without the need for extensive preprocessing or manual feature engineering, which makes it particularly suitable for complex logistics operations.

Shipments with anomalous characteristics, such as unexpected delays, unusual routing, oversized packages, or inconsistent delivery patterns, receive higher anomaly scores. This enables logistics teams to prioritize their investigations, focusing on high-risk cases first. The ability to generate a ranking or scoring system for anomalies is a critical advantage over simpler unsupervised methods, allowing operational teams to take immediate action on shipments that could impact service quality, customer satisfaction, or security.

RCF is unsupervised, meaning it does not require labeled data. This is especially important because anomalies in logistics—like rare shipment deviations or fraud—are inherently infrequent and often cannot be reliably labeled in advance. Attempting to create a labeled dataset for these rare events would be prohibitively expensive and time-consuming. Moreover, RCF is scalable to handle large, multi-dimensional datasets, making it suitable for logistics companies that manage thousands or millions of shipments across multiple distribution centers daily. SageMaker provides a fully managed environment for training and deploying RCF models, allowing real-time anomaly detection and continuous monitoring.

RCF also adapts to evolving patterns over time. Logistics operations are dynamic and influenced by factors like seasonal fluctuations, market changes, new distribution routes, and variations in carrier performance. RCF continuously learns from new data, maintaining accuracy and reducing false positives or false negatives as operational patterns shift. Its ability to handle high-dimensional features without dimensionality reduction ensures that all relevant information contributes to anomaly detection, leading to better insights and operational decisions.

B) XGBoost is a supervised learning algorithm that excels at classification and regression tasks when labeled data is available. It is highly effective for predicting outcomes based on historical examples, but it is not suitable for detecting anomalies in unlabeled datasets. Without a set of labeled anomalous shipments, XGBoost cannot learn the patterns of normal versus abnormal shipments, which makes it ineffective for this scenario. While XGBoost is extremely powerful in structured supervised tasks, relying on it for unsupervised anomaly detection would require artificially labeling anomalies, introducing bias, and potentially missing rare or unforeseen patterns in shipment data.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm used for regression or classification tasks. It requires labeled outputs to predict or classify data points. In the context of logistics anomaly detection, Linear Learner cannot be applied effectively because unusual shipment patterns are typically unlabeled. Additionally, Linear Learner is a linear model and is not well-suited to capture the complex, non-linear relationships often present in high-dimensional shipment data, such as correlations between delivery time, route deviations, and package volume.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm capable of grouping data into clusters based on similarity. While it can be used to segment shipments into groups, K-Means is less effective at detecting rare or subtle anomalies. Its clustering assumes roughly spherical clusters and equal variance, which is often unrealistic in real-world logistics data. Rare anomalies may be misclassified as part of a normal cluster, and K-Means does not produce an anomaly score to prioritize investigations, making it difficult to act quickly on high-risk shipments.

In Random Cut Forest is the optimal choice for scalable, unsupervised detection of unusual shipment patterns in logistics operations. Its ability to generate anomaly scores, handle high-dimensional datasets, scale across large volumes, adapt to changing operational patterns, and operate without labeled anomalies makes it ideal for modern logistics environments. By using RCF, a logistics company can detect operational issues, improve efficiency, reduce delays, prevent potential fraud, and make data-driven decisions to maintain high service quality across multiple distribution centers.