Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning – Specialty (MLS-C01) Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q161-180

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning – Specialty exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 161

A team wants to deploy multiple ML models on a single endpoint, loading them dynamically on demand to save memory. Which feature should they use?

A) SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints
B) SageMaker Asynchronous Inference
C) ECS Auto Scaling
D) EC2 Spot Instances

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints are specifically designed to host multiple models on a single endpoint. They load models from S3 into memory only when requests arrive, which conserves memory and allows for efficient cost management. This feature is particularly useful when you have many models that are not all used constantly but need to be available on demand. It simplifies management and scaling because you do not need separate endpoints for each model.

SageMaker Asynchronous Inference, on the other hand, is intended for long-running inference requests. It queues requests and returns results asynchronously but does not provide dynamic multi-model loading. While it can help with high-latency predictions, it does not optimize memory usage across multiple models in the way Multi-Model Endpoints do.

ECS Auto Scaling is a container orchestration solution that can scale containerized applications based on demand. While it can be used to deploy ML models in containers, it requires significant manual setup for managing multiple models dynamically, and memory efficiency depends entirely on your orchestration logic. It does not provide the seamless single-endpoint multi-model loading that SageMaker offers.

EC2 Spot Instances provide cost savings by using unused compute capacity, but they are a low-level infrastructure option. They do not include features for dynamic model loading or endpoint management, and using them would require additional orchestration and memory management to support multiple models on a single endpoint.

The correct choice is SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints because it combines dynamic loading, memory efficiency, and simplified endpoint management, all designed specifically for hosting multiple models on a single endpoint.

Question 162

A company wants to forecast demand for thousands of products using historical data and related datasets. Which AWS service is appropriate?

A) Amazon Forecast
B) SageMaker Autopilot
C) AWS Lambda
D) Lookout for Metrics

Answer: A

Explanation:

Amazon Forecast is purpose-built for time-series forecasting. It can automatically model historical demand, incorporate holidays, seasonality, and related datasets, and produce accurate forecasts for thousands of items. It handles scaling for large datasets, providing predictions for multiple products in parallel.

SageMaker Autopilot is an automated ML tool that creates general-purpose models, but it does not specialize in time-series forecasting or automatically manage seasonal or temporal effects. While it could be used to train a forecasting model, it lacks the dedicated features and optimizations that Forecast provides.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that executes code but does not provide forecasting capabilities. Lambda could support preprocessing or orchestrating tasks for ML, but it cannot generate predictive models or handle large-scale forecasting tasks on its own.

Lookout for Metrics is designed for anomaly detection in metrics and time-series data. It identifies unexpected spikes, drops, or changes but is not intended to generate forward-looking forecasts for large product sets.

Forecast is the best choice because it automates all aspects of demand prediction at scale, handles temporal and relational datasets, and produces accurate, actionable forecasts efficiently.

Question 163

A startup wants to train a large NLP model on multiple GPU instances with minimal setup. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Distributed Training
B) Lambda
C) AWS Glue
D) Rekognition

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Distributed Training is a service designed to simplify the process of training large machine learning models across multiple GPU instances. It automatically handles the orchestration of multi-node, multi-GPU setups, which is particularly useful for complex models like NLP architectures that require significant computational power and memory. By managing communication between nodes and distributing workloads efficiently, it reduces the complexity of setting up distributed training manually. This allows data scientists and ML engineers to focus on model design and experimentation rather than infrastructure management. It also ensures optimal GPU utilization, helping teams train models faster and more cost-effectively while maintaining scalability for very large datasets.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that is designed for lightweight, short-lived tasks rather than intensive ML training. While it can execute code without provisioning servers, it does not provide access to GPU resources or the high memory capacity needed for training large NLP models. Lambda is ideal for automating workflows, processing small data batches, or handling inference requests for lightweight models, but it is not suitable for scenarios where multi-GPU orchestration and high-performance training are required. Using Lambda for such tasks would result in inadequate resources, timeouts, and inefficient performance.

AWS Glue is an extract, transform, and load (ETL) service primarily intended for data preparation, cleaning, and integration. It allows users to process and transform large datasets, making it easier to feed clean and structured data into machine learning workflows. However, Glue is not a training service and cannot leverage GPUs for ML workloads. It does not include features for model parallelism, distributed training, or performance optimization required for large-scale NLP model training. Its utility lies in data engineering rather than in managing or accelerating model training.

Amazon Rekognition is a fully managed computer vision service that provides pre-built capabilities for image and video analysis, such as object detection, facial recognition, and content moderation. It does not offer functionality for training NLP models, multi-node distributed training, or managing GPUs. While Rekognition is highly useful for vision tasks, it is irrelevant for scenarios involving NLP model development or large-scale distributed training setups.

Considering all options, SageMaker Distributed Training is the clear choice for training large NLP models across multiple GPU instances. It combines automated orchestration, scalability, and resource optimization, reducing manual setup and enabling efficient model training. This makes it the most appropriate service for teams looking to handle high-performance NLP workloads with minimal operational overhead.

Question 164

A company wants to deploy reinforcement learning models to edge devices with versioning and automatic updates. Which service should they choose?

A) SageMaker Edge Manager
B) SageMaker Processing
C) AWS Batch
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Edge Manager is a service designed specifically for managing machine learning models on edge devices. It enables teams to package, deploy, monitor, and update models efficiently, providing centralized control even when models are distributed across a fleet of devices. One of its key features is versioning, which ensures that each edge device runs the correct model version and can receive updates automatically. This is particularly important for reinforcement learning applications, where models may be continuously improved and need to be deployed safely and reliably in real-world environments. Edge Manager also includes monitoring capabilities, allowing teams to track model performance on edge devices and detect issues proactively.

SageMaker Processing, in contrast, is focused on preprocessing, postprocessing, and feature engineering tasks. It helps prepare data for model training, conduct transformations, and run batch analytics on datasets. While these functions are critical in the ML workflow, SageMaker Processing does not provide features for deploying models to edge devices, updating them, or managing their lifecycle remotely. It is primarily a cloud-based data processing service rather than a deployment or edge management tool.

AWS Batch is a fully managed batch processing service that allows users to run large-scale compute jobs efficiently. It is excellent for parallelizing workloads or performing heavy computation at scale in the cloud. However, AWS Batch is not intended for deploying models to edge devices or managing them in real time. It does not provide version control, automatic updates, or monitoring for distributed ML models on devices outside the cloud. Using it for edge deployment would require significant manual orchestration and additional infrastructure.

AWS Glue is an ETL (extract, transform, load) service that simplifies data preparation by cleaning, transforming, and integrating datasets. While it is highly valuable for feeding clean data into ML pipelines, it has no functionality for deploying or managing machine learning models. Glue is focused entirely on data workflows and does not support real-time inference or model lifecycle management on edge devices.

Considering these options, SageMaker Edge Manager is the clear choice for deploying reinforcement learning models to edge devices. It is purpose-built to handle packaging, deployment, versioning, updating, and monitoring of models in distributed environments. Its automated and centralized approach reduces operational overhead while ensuring secure and efficient management of ML models across multiple devices, which is critical for applications that rely on real-time decision-making or continuous learning at the edge.

Question 165

A team wants to track ML experiments, including datasets, hyperparameters, and metrics visually. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Experiments
B) SageMaker Data Wrangler
C) SageMaker Canvas
D) SageMaker Edge Manager

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Experiments is a service designed to help teams track and manage machine learning experiments in a structured and visual way. It allows users to record training runs, hyperparameters, datasets, and evaluation metrics, providing a comprehensive view of model development. With its visual interface, teams can easily compare multiple experiments side by side, identify trends or patterns, and reproduce successful runs. This capability is especially important in iterative ML workflows, where repeated experimentation is necessary to optimize model performance and ensure reproducibility across teams and projects. Experiments provides a centralized repository for tracking the full lifecycle of ML models, making collaboration and decision-making more efficient.

SageMaker Data Wrangler is a tool aimed at simplifying feature engineering and data preparation. It helps users clean, transform, and integrate data for training machine learning models. While it streamlines the preprocessing phase and reduces manual coding, it does not focus on tracking experiments, recording metrics, or visualizing training runs. Its primary purpose is to prepare high-quality datasets for ML workflows rather than providing insights into model performance or iterative experimentation.

SageMaker Canvas is a no-code platform that allows business users or analysts to build and deploy machine learning models without programming. It abstracts much of the technical complexity of model creation, enabling faster deployment for non-technical users. However, Canvas does not provide tools for experiment tracking, hyperparameter tuning, or detailed visualization of model runs. It is intended for simplified model creation rather than in-depth ML experimentation or analysis.

SageMaker Edge Manager is focused on deploying, monitoring, and managing models on edge devices. While it excels at managing distributed model deployments and updates in real-world environments, it does not support experiment tracking, visualization of training metrics, or comparison of model runs. Its functionality is entirely centered around the deployment and lifecycle management of ML models rather than experimentation or analytics.

Considering all the options, SageMaker Experiments is the correct choice for teams that need to track and visualize machine learning experiments. It provides robust capabilities to manage datasets, hyperparameters, and metrics, while allowing visual comparison of multiple training runs. This enables teams to iterate effectively, optimize models, and maintain reproducibility, making it the ideal tool for structured experiment management and performance analysis in ML workflows.

Question 166

A company wants to monitor deployed ML models for bias and explainability. Which service is appropriate?

A) SageMaker Clarify
B) SageMaker Model Monitor
C) CloudWatch Metrics
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Clarify is a specialized service designed to detect bias and provide explainability for machine learning models. It can analyze both datasets and trained models to identify potential sources of bias, and it generates reports that highlight which features influence model predictions. Clarify can be applied both before training, to detect biases in input data, and after training, to evaluate the model’s behavior. This is particularly important for regulated industries or applications where fairness and transparency are critical.

SageMaker Model Monitor focuses on monitoring the quality of deployed models over time. It primarily detects drift in the input data or model predictions, alerting teams when models may no longer be performing as expected. While it provides insights into model performance and helps maintain accuracy, it does not directly evaluate bias or provide feature-level explainability reports.

CloudWatch Metrics is a general-purpose monitoring service for AWS resources and applications. It tracks operational metrics, such as CPU usage, memory consumption, and network throughput. While valuable for infrastructure monitoring, it is not tailored for machine learning-specific concerns like bias detection or explainability. It lacks the specialized analysis needed to ensure fairness or interpretability of ML models.

AWS Glue is an extract, transform, and load (ETL) service used for data preparation, cleaning, and cataloging. It is excellent for building pipelines and integrating data from multiple sources, but it does not provide functionality for analyzing or explaining machine learning models. Its focus is purely on data processing rather than model evaluation.

The correct choice is SageMaker Clarify because it is purpose-built for evaluating bias and generating explainability reports. While Model Monitor tracks drift and performance, and CloudWatch and Glue handle infrastructure or data tasks, only Clarify combines fairness assessment with interpretability, making it the right tool for monitoring deployed models for bias and explainability.

Question 167

A company wants to preprocess large-scale image data in a managed distributed ML environment integrated with S3. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Processing
B) Amazon EMR
C) AWS Glue
D) EC2 Auto Scaling

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Processing provides a fully managed environment for preprocessing and postprocessing large datasets in a distributed manner. It supports integration with S3, allowing direct access to input data and storage of processed outputs. Processing jobs can be scaled across multiple instances without requiring manual cluster management, making it ideal for ML workflows involving large-scale image or structured data preprocessing.

Amazon EMR is a managed cluster service for big data frameworks like Hadoop, Spark, and Presto. While it is capable of distributed computation, it is primarily designed for general-purpose big data processing rather than ML-specific preprocessing. It requires more configuration and management to integrate into a machine learning pipeline compared to SageMaker Processing.

AWS Glue is focused on ETL operations, automating data cleaning, transformation, and cataloging. While it can handle structured and semi-structured data at scale, it is not optimized for ML preprocessing tasks, especially for large image datasets or tasks requiring specialized ML-compatible libraries.

EC2 Auto Scaling provides the ability to scale compute resources based on demand. However, it does not provide a managed environment for distributed ML preprocessing. Users must manually configure instances, handle dependencies, and orchestrate parallel processing, which adds complexity and overhead.

The correct choice is SageMaker Processing because it combines managed distributed computation with tight ML integration and S3 connectivity. EMR, Glue, and EC2 Auto Scaling do not provide the same level of ML-focused preprocessing support or out-of-the-box scalability, making Processing the best option for large-scale image preprocessing.

Question 168

A company wants to run large-scale batch inference without requiring real-time predictions. Which service is best?

A) SageMaker Batch Transform
B) SageMaker Real-Time Inference
C) SageMaker Serverless Inference
D) AWS Lambda

Answer: A

Explanation: 

SageMaker Batch Transform is designed for high-volume, asynchronous inference on large datasets. It allows users to score entire datasets at once without the need for an always-on endpoint. Batch Transform handles data in bulk, distributes processing across multiple instances, and is cost-effective for scenarios where real-time responses are unnecessary.

SageMaker Real-Time Inference provides low-latency predictions via an always-on endpoint. It is ideal for applications where immediate responses are required, but it is less efficient and more costly for large-scale batch operations, as it keeps instances running continuously.

SageMaker Serverless Inference offers a fully managed, auto-scaling option for online predictions. It is optimized for variable workloads with intermittent requests, but it is still designed for real-time or near-real-time inference rather than bulk batch scoring.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service capable of executing code on demand. While Lambda can perform inference, it is constrained by execution time and memory limits, making it unsuitable for large-scale ML batch processing.

The correct choice is SageMaker Batch Transform because it efficiently handles bulk inference in a managed and scalable way, whereas the other options are geared toward real-time or smaller-scale workloads.

Question 169

A company wants to detect anomalies in business metrics automatically. Which service should they use?

A) Lookout for Metrics
B) Amazon Forecast
C) SageMaker Autopilot
D) AWS Lambda

Answer: A

Explanation:

Lookout for Metrics is purpose-built to automatically detect anomalies in numeric and time-series business data. It applies machine learning to identify sudden spikes, drops, or unexpected patterns in metrics such as sales, revenue, or operational KPIs. The service can also provide insights into potential root causes, helping teams respond quickly to unusual changes.

Amazon Forecast generates predictions and forecasts based on historical data. While useful for planning and anticipating trends, it is not designed to detect deviations or anomalies in real time. Its primary goal is trend prediction rather than automatic anomaly detection.

SageMaker Autopilot automates the ML workflow by building and tuning models from datasets. Although it simplifies model creation, it does not provide an out-of-the-box solution for real-time or automated anomaly detection in business metrics.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service capable of executing arbitrary code. It can be used to implement custom anomaly detection, but it requires manual algorithm development, monitoring, and scaling, making it less practical for automated detection at scale.

The correct choice is Lookout for Metrics because it is specifically designed to identify anomalies automatically, whereas the other services focus on prediction, model automation, or general-purpose computation.

Question 170

A healthcare company wants to label sensitive images securely with HIPAA compliance. Which service is appropriate?

A) SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce
B) Mechanical Turk
C) AWS Batch
D) Rekognition Custom Labels

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce is a managed service that enables organizations to securely label sensitive data within their own environment. It allows the creation of private labeling teams inside a customer’s virtual private cloud (VPC), ensuring that sensitive data never leaves the organization’s controlled environment. This setup is particularly important for healthcare applications, where protected health information (PHI) must remain secure and compliant with HIPAA regulations. The service also supports audit logging, tracking which workers access data and how tasks are completed, providing transparency and accountability for sensitive workflows. Using Private Workforce, organizations can maintain strict control over who can view and label sensitive images, reducing the risk of data exposure while enabling high-quality human-labeled datasets for machine learning.

Mechanical Turk provides access to a broad, public workforce for labeling tasks. It is a flexible and cost-effective solution for general-purpose data labeling, but it lacks the security and privacy controls needed for sensitive data. Workers are external and unknown to the organization, so using Mechanical Turk for healthcare or other regulated data could result in non-compliance with HIPAA or other privacy standards. While useful for non-sensitive datasets, it is not appropriate for situations where data confidentiality and regulatory compliance are mandatory.

AWS Batch is a managed service designed to run large-scale batch computing workloads. It provides scalable and efficient execution of computational jobs across AWS resources, but it does not offer human labeling capabilities or workflows. AWS Batch cannot provide the security, privacy controls, or compliance guarantees needed for regulated datasets. It is useful for data processing or training machine learning models once data is already labeled, but it is not a solution for secure human-in-the-loop labeling.

Rekognition Custom Labels is an automated computer vision labeling service. It allows users to build models that can detect and classify objects within images, reducing manual labeling effort. However, it cannot guarantee human verification of sensitive images and may not meet strict compliance requirements, particularly in healthcare. While it is valuable for automating labeling at scale, it does not provide the privacy, VPC isolation, or audit logging that Private Workforce offers.

The correct choice is SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce because it uniquely combines secure human labeling, HIPAA compliance, VPC isolation, and audit logging. Unlike Mechanical Turk, AWS Batch, or Rekognition, it ensures that sensitive healthcare data is handled in a controlled, compliant, and auditable manner, making it the most suitable solution for labeling protected and regulated datasets.

Question 171

A startup wants to deploy thousands of small ML models efficiently on a single endpoint, loading them dynamically. Which feature should they use?

A) SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints
B) SageMaker Asynchronous Inference
C) ECS Auto Scaling
D) EC2 Spot Instances

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints are designed to host multiple machine learning models on a single endpoint efficiently. They allow models to be stored in Amazon S3 and loaded dynamically into memory only when needed. This approach saves significant memory and reduces costs, especially for startups that need to deploy thousands of small models. The endpoint automatically handles routing requests to the appropriate model, making it easier to manage a large number of models without manual intervention.

SageMaker Asynchronous Inference is intended for handling long-running inference requests that may take significant time to complete. It allows clients to submit requests and retrieve results once processing is finished. While it is useful for batch-like inference tasks and managing latency, it does not provide dynamic model loading or the ability to host multiple models on the same endpoint simultaneously, which is critical for the startup’s scenario.

ECS Auto Scaling is a service that automatically adjusts the number of container instances in an ECS cluster based on demand. While this can scale compute resources to handle varying workloads, it does not inherently provide ML-specific features such as model loading, inference routing, or memory-efficient hosting of multiple models. It would require extensive manual orchestration to mimic what Multi-Model Endpoints provide out-of-the-box.

EC2 Spot Instances provide cost-efficient compute capacity by using unused EC2 instances at a discount. While useful for reducing infrastructure costs, Spot Instances require manual provisioning, deployment, and management of ML models. They do not inherently support multiple models per endpoint or dynamic model loading, making them less suitable for a startup needing efficient, scalable hosting of thousands of models.

SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints are the ideal choice because they provide a built-in mechanism for dynamic model loading, efficient memory utilization, and simplified deployment of multiple ML models. The other options either address different problems such as long-running inference, general compute scaling, or cost optimization but do not provide the integrated functionality required for efficiently hosting thousands of small models on a single endpoint.

Question 172

A company wants to forecast deliveries across multiple locations using historical and related datasets. Which service is best?

A) Amazon Forecast
B) SageMaker Autopilot
C) AWS Lambda
D) Lookout for Metrics

Answer: A

Explanation:

Amazon Forecast is a fully managed service specifically designed for time-series forecasting. It can use historical data along with related datasets such as holidays, promotions, or other influencing factors to improve prediction accuracy. Forecast also supports multiple items and locations simultaneously, making it ideal for companies looking to predict deliveries across several sites. The service automates the selection of algorithms and tuning, producing highly accurate forecasts without requiring deep expertise in time-series modeling.

SageMaker Autopilot is an automated machine learning service that creates and trains models for a wide variety of ML tasks. While it is powerful for general-purpose ML, it is not specialized for time-series forecasting and does not provide built-in features for handling multiple locations or incorporating related datasets for sequential predictions, which are key requirements in this scenario.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows execution of code in response to events. While Lambda can be used to orchestrate data pipelines or trigger model inference, it is not designed for machine learning or forecasting tasks. It cannot automatically generate time-series models or handle large-scale prediction tasks efficiently on its own.

Lookout for Metrics is focused on anomaly detection rather than forecasting. It uses machine learning to detect unexpected deviations in business metrics, such as sudden drops in sales or spikes in operational metrics. While useful for monitoring performance or identifying problems, it does not provide predictive forecasting capabilities or handle multiple related datasets for generating future delivery predictions.

Amazon Forecast is the correct choice because it is purpose-built for time-series forecasting, supports multiple related datasets and locations, automates model selection, and provides accurate predictions for operational planning. The other services either serve different ML purposes, such as anomaly detection, general model automation, or compute orchestration, and do not meet the specific needs of multi-location delivery forecasting.

Question 173

A startup wants to run multi-node GPU training for a large NLP model. Which service is appropriate?

A) SageMaker Distributed Training
B) Lambda
C) AWS Glue
D) Rekognition

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Distributed Training is designed to simplify the process of training large machine learning models across multiple nodes and GPUs. It abstracts the complexity of setting up distributed training frameworks like Horovod or DeepSpeed, automatically splitting datasets, synchronizing gradients, and managing communication between nodes. This service is particularly useful for large NLP models that require substantial memory and computational power that cannot be handled on a single GPU.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that allows small, stateless functions to run in response to events. However, Lambda has severe limitations in terms of runtime duration, memory, and hardware acceleration. It cannot accommodate large-scale GPU workloads or multi-node training and is therefore unsuitable for training complex NLP models.

AWS Glue is a managed ETL service used for extracting, transforming, and loading data. While it is useful for preprocessing data before model training, it does not provide capabilities for distributed GPU training or machine learning model execution. Glue focuses on data pipelines rather than compute-intensive ML workloads.

Amazon Rekognition is an image and video analysis service that uses pre-trained computer vision models to detect objects, faces, text, and activities. It is designed for visual recognition tasks and cannot be used to train custom NLP models. Its functionality is unrelated to distributed training or large-scale model development.

SageMaker Distributed Training is the correct choice because it provides the infrastructure, tools, and orchestration necessary to efficiently train large NLP models across multiple GPUs and nodes. The other options either focus on compute orchestration for small tasks, ETL, or pre-built vision models, and do not meet the requirements of large-scale distributed NLP training.

Question 174

A company wants to deploy RL models to edge devices with version control and automatic updates. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Edge Manager
B) SageMaker Processing
C) AWS Batch
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Edge Manager is purpose-built for deploying machine learning models, including reinforcement learning (RL) models, to edge devices. It allows version control, monitoring, and automatic updates of models on distributed devices. This ensures that edge devices are running the latest model versions while maintaining operational efficiency and security. Edge Manager also provides metrics and health monitoring, which are essential for maintaining performance in remote or disconnected environments.

SageMaker Processing is focused on preprocessing and postprocessing of data, feature engineering, and other preparatory tasks. It is not intended for deployment to edge devices and does not provide version control or update capabilities. While it is valuable for data manipulation prior to training, it cannot manage RL models in production environments on edge devices.

AWS Batch enables efficient execution of large-scale batch computing jobs by dynamically provisioning compute resources. It is useful for parallel workloads or processing large datasets but does not provide features for managing models on edge devices, automatic updates, or version tracking for deployed models.

AWS Glue is an ETL service designed to extract, transform, and load data. It does not provide deployment capabilities for machine learning models, nor does it support reinforcement learning or edge-specific requirements. Glue is strictly a data pipeline tool rather than a model management solution.

SageMaker Edge Manager is the correct service because it combines deployment, monitoring, versioning, and updates for ML models on edge devices, addressing all the company’s requirements. The other options provide processing or compute functionality but cannot manage models on edge hardware.

Question 175

A team wants to track ML experiments including datasets, hyperparameters, and metrics visually. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Experiments
B) SageMaker Data Wrangler
C) SageMaker Canvas
D) SageMaker Edge Manager

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Experiments allows teams to organize, track, and compare machine learning experiments systematically. It records datasets, hyperparameters, metrics, and model artifacts automatically during training runs. Teams can visualize experiments side by side to identify the best-performing models and understand how parameter changes affect performance. This service is highly beneficial for structured experimentation and reproducibility in ML workflows.

SageMaker Data Wrangler focuses on simplifying the process of cleaning, transforming, and preparing data for machine learning. While it provides a visual interface for feature engineering and preprocessing tasks, it does not track experiments or training metrics over multiple runs. Its primary role is data preparation rather than experiment management.

SageMaker Canvas is a no-code ML service that allows business analysts to build models without writing code. While useful for creating predictive models quickly, it does not provide detailed tracking of training experiments, hyperparameters, or metrics. It is more suited for rapid prototyping rather than structured ML experimentation.

SageMaker Edge Manager is designed for managing and deploying ML models on edge devices. It includes version control and monitoring of deployed models but does not provide tools for tracking experiments or visualizing training metrics. Its focus is on production deployment rather than experimentation.

SageMaker Experiments is the correct choice because it specifically addresses the need to track, compare, and visualize ML experiments, including hyperparameters, datasets, and performance metrics. The other services focus on data preparation, no-code model creation, or edge deployment, which are outside the scope of experiment tracking.

Question 176

A company wants to monitor deployed ML models for bias and explainability. Which service should they choose?

A) SageMaker Clarify
B) SageMaker Model Monitor
C) CloudWatch Metrics
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Clarify is a service specifically designed to detect and analyze bias in datasets and machine learning models. It provides insights into fairness by evaluating training data and model predictions to highlight potentially biased outcomes. Clarify also offers explainability reports, which break down feature contributions for model predictions, helping stakeholders understand how the model makes decisions. This is particularly useful in regulated industries or in cases where transparency is required to maintain trust.

SageMaker Model Monitor is a service for monitoring the performance and quality of deployed models. It can detect data drift or anomalies in incoming data compared to the training data, helping ensure model predictions remain accurate over time. However, Model Monitor does not inherently provide bias or explainability insights. Its primary focus is on operational monitoring and quality maintenance, not fairness or transparency analysis.

CloudWatch Metrics is a monitoring service for AWS infrastructure and application metrics. It allows users to track system performance, resource utilization, and operational health. While CloudWatch can indirectly support ML operations by alerting on anomalies in infrastructure or application metrics, it does not evaluate ML models for bias or explainability. It is mainly an observability tool for operational monitoring rather than model assessment.

AWS Glue is a fully managed ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) service that helps with data preparation, cataloging, and transformation. Glue is useful for building pipelines to clean and transform datasets for ML, but it has no built-in capabilities for assessing model fairness, bias, or explainability. Its scope is entirely focused on data processing and integration.

Considering the requirements, the company is focused on evaluating bias and understanding model decisions. While Model Monitor, CloudWatch, and Glue address different aspects of ML operations and infrastructure, only SageMaker Clarify directly addresses bias detection and explainability. Its ability to generate reports on feature importance and potential fairness issues makes it the most appropriate choice for this scenario.

Question 177

A company wants to preprocess large-scale image data in a managed distributed ML environment integrated with S3. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Processing
B) Amazon EMR
C) AWS Glue
D) EC2 Auto Scaling

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Processing allows companies to run preprocessing and postprocessing jobs in a fully managed environment. It is tightly integrated with S3, making it easy to read large datasets and store outputs directly in S3 buckets. Processing supports distributed compute, allowing for efficient scaling when working with large datasets such as images. It also integrates with SageMaker training and inference workflows, which makes the end-to-end ML pipeline seamless.

Amazon EMR is a managed Hadoop and Spark service designed for big data processing. It can scale to handle large datasets and provides distributed computation, but it is not specifically tailored for ML workflows. EMR would require additional setup and integration to work efficiently with ML models or pipelines, making it less convenient for preprocessing ML-specific data compared to SageMaker Processing.

AWS Glue focuses on ETL operations, such as cleaning, transforming, and cataloging structured or semi-structured data. While Glue can process large datasets, it is not optimized for image preprocessing or large-scale ML workflows. Glue is better suited for traditional data engineering tasks rather than ML-specific preprocessing.

EC2 Auto Scaling manages scaling of compute resources for general-purpose workloads. While it can provide scalable compute, it lacks the managed ML-focused features of Processing. Users would need to manually orchestrate preprocessing workflows and integrate with S3, adding operational complexity.

SageMaker Processing is the ideal choice because it provides a fully managed, scalable environment specifically for ML preprocessing tasks, with native S3 integration and support for distributed computation. Its design minimizes operational overhead and ensures seamless integration with training and inference pipelines.

Question 178

A company wants to run large-scale batch inference without real-time requirements. Which service is most suitable?

A) SageMaker Batch Transform
B) SageMaker Real-Time Inference
C) SageMaker Serverless Inference
D) AWS Lambda

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Batch Transform is designed for running batch inference jobs at scale. It reads input data from S3, applies the deployed ML model, and writes predictions back to S3. It is asynchronous and does not require continuous uptime, making it ideal for jobs that do not need real-time responses. Batch Transform also supports distributed computation, allowing efficient processing of large datasets.

SageMaker Real-Time Inference endpoints are intended for low-latency, online predictions. They maintain persistent endpoints that can handle single or small batches of requests in real time. This approach is unnecessary and less cost-efficient for large-scale batch jobs, where responses are not needed immediately.

SageMaker Serverless Inference allows automatic scaling for intermittent real-time requests without managing endpoints. While it simplifies deployment for unpredictable traffic, it is not designed for large-scale batch jobs and may become inefficient for very large datasets.

AWS Lambda is a general-purpose serverless compute service. It can invoke ML models indirectly but is not optimized for large-scale ML inference workloads. Lambda has execution time limits and is more suitable for small tasks or event-driven triggers.

Considering these options, SageMaker Batch Transform is the clear choice for large-scale batch inference. It is purpose-built for asynchronous, high-volume processing and integrates well with S3, making it the most suitable service for the scenario described.

Question 179

A company wants to detect anomalies in business metrics automatically. Which service should they use?

A) Lookout for Metrics
B) Amazon Forecast
C) SageMaker Autopilot
D) AWS Lambda

Answer: A

Explanation:

Lookout for Metrics is a fully managed service designed to automatically detect anomalies in business metrics such as revenue, sales, or operational KPIs. It leverages machine learning to identify unexpected patterns, spikes, or drops in numeric time-series data. The service also provides root-cause analysis and integrates with AWS monitoring and notification services.

Amazon Forecast is focused on time-series forecasting. It predicts future values based on historical data trends but is not intended for anomaly detection. While forecasting can indirectly highlight unusual values, it does not provide automated anomaly detection or explain the causes of anomalies.

SageMaker Autopilot automates the ML model creation process by automatically selecting algorithms, preprocessing, and training models. It does not focus on anomaly detection or monitoring of business metrics. Autopilot is geared toward building predictive models rather than continuously observing data streams for irregularities.

AWS Lambda is a general-purpose serverless compute service. It can be used as part of an anomaly detection pipeline but does not provide built-in anomaly detection capabilities. Lambda would require custom code and additional resources to achieve the same functionality provided out-of-the-box by Lookout for Metrics.

Given the requirement for automated detection and root-cause analysis of business metric anomalies, Lookout for Metrics is the most appropriate choice. It is designed specifically for anomaly detection in time-series data, making it a purpose-built solution for the company’s needs.

Question 180

A healthcare company wants to label sensitive images securely with HIPAA compliance. Which service is appropriate?

A) SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce
B) Mechanical Turk
C) AWS Batch
D) Rekognition Custom Labels

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce allows labeling tasks to be completed by trusted, authorized personnel within a private environment. It ensures HIPAA compliance by keeping all data within secure VPCs and providing audit logging of labeling activities. This is essential for healthcare data, where sensitive patient information must remain protected and controlled.

Mechanical Turk is a public crowd-sourcing platform that connects tasks to a large, anonymous workforce. While it is suitable for general labeling tasks, it cannot guarantee HIPAA compliance or secure handling of sensitive healthcare data. Data exposure is a major concern when using a public workforce.

AWS Batch is a managed compute service designed to run large-scale batch processing jobs. While it is useful for computational workloads, it does not provide labeling functionality or tools to ensure secure handling of sensitive image data.

Rekognition Custom Labels allows automated image labeling using ML models. Although it can identify objects or patterns, it lacks the private workforce controls necessary for sensitive data and does not inherently provide HIPAA-compliant workflows for human verification.

Considering these options, SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce is the clear choice. It combines managed labeling with secure access, compliance features, and audit capabilities, making it the most appropriate service for handling sensitive healthcare images.