Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4  FCSS – SD-WAN 7.4 Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 10 Q 181-200

Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 181

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, specifying performance parameters like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance against these thresholds. When a link fails to meet SLA requirements, ERP traffic is automatically routed over the most reliable link, such as MPLS, while non-critical traffic like web browsing or email is routed over lower-cost broadband or LTE links. Application-aware SLA routing integrates real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization to maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications while optimizing WAN resource utilization. This automation reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees that business-critical applications perform reliably under dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing provides predetermined, fixed paths for traffic. It does not respond to changes in WAN link performance. If the primary link experiences congestion or packet loss, ERP traffic may continue using it, leading to SLA violations, poor performance, and potential operational disruption. Static routing lacks real-time monitoring, dynamic path selection, and application awareness, making it unsuitable for critical applications that require consistent SLA compliance.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and manually rerouting traffic. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied. Manual switching does not proactively monitor link performance or automatically enforce application prioritization, resulting in potential SLA violations.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority, link quality, or performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, leading to packet loss, jitter, and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation and application awareness, making it inadequate for mission-critical application traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management required for critical applications.

Question 182

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link that can maintain high-quality service. Non-critical traffic continues using backup or lower-cost links, ensuring efficient bandwidth utilization. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications like VoIP. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in poor voice quality, jitter, and packet loss. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical voice communications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse suboptimal links, causing SLA violations and degraded voice quality. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or provide application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management required for critical applications.

Question 183

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees that mission-critical applications maintain performance even during WAN degradation. By combining real-time monitoring with application-aware routing, SD-WAN ensures ERP and other critical applications are delivered reliably while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot respond to WAN performance issues. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and potential business disruption. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations, packet loss, and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 184

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 185

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and potential business disruption. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 186

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, specifying performance parameters like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance against these thresholds. When a link fails to meet SLA requirements, ERP traffic is automatically routed over the most reliable link, such as MPLS, while non-critical traffic like web browsing, email, and file transfers is routed over lower-cost broadband or LTE links. Application-aware SLA routing integrates real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization to maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications while optimizing WAN resource utilization. This proactive automation reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees that business-critical applications perform reliably under dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing provides predetermined, fixed paths for traffic. It does not respond to changes in WAN link performance. If the primary link experiences congestion, packet loss, or other degradation, ERP traffic may continue using it, leading to SLA violations, slow performance, and potential business disruption. Static routing lacks real-time monitoring, dynamic path selection, and application-aware intelligence, making it unsuitable for critical applications requiring consistent SLA adherence.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and manually rerouting traffic. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied. Manual switching does not proactively monitor link performance or enforce application prioritization, making it unreliable for SLA-sensitive applications.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority, link quality, or performance metrics. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse suboptimal links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation and application-aware intelligence, making it inadequate for mission-critical application traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 187

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link cannot meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality service. Non-critical traffic, such as email, file transfers, and web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links, optimizing bandwidth utilization. Automation ensures SLA compliance, minimizes manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications like VoIP. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that voice traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while WAN resources are efficiently utilized.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware intelligence, making it unsuitable for critical voice communications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN performance issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations and poor voice quality. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or provide application-aware intelligence, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic is efficiently routed over secondary paths. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and proactive traffic management.

Question 188

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance even during WAN degradation. By combining real-time monitoring with application-aware routing, SD-WAN ensures ERP and other essential applications are delivered reliably while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, leading to SLA violations, performance degradation, and potential operational impact. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations, packet loss, and performance degradation. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware intelligence, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for mission-critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 189

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 190

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and potential operational impact. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 191

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications, such as ERP, using metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance against these thresholds. When a link fails to meet SLA requirements, ERP traffic is automatically routed over the most reliable link, such as MPLS, while non-critical traffic like web browsing, email, and file transfers is routed over lower-cost broadband or LTE links. Application-aware SLA routing integrates real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization to maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications while optimizing WAN resource utilization. Automation reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees that business-critical applications maintain reliable performance even under fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides predetermined, fixed paths for traffic and cannot respond to dynamic changes in WAN performance. If the primary link experiences congestion or packet loss, ERP traffic may continue using it, leading to SLA violations and potential business disruption. Static routing lacks automation, dynamic path selection, and application-aware intelligence, making it unsuitable for critical applications requiring consistent SLA adherence.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied. Manual switching does not proactively monitor link performance or enforce application prioritization, which can result in SLA violations and degraded application performance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority, link quality, or performance metrics. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation and application awareness, making it inadequate for mission-critical application traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 192

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality service. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing, email, and file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links, optimizing bandwidth utilization. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications like VoIP. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees consistent, high-quality voice communications while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in poor voice quality, jitter, and packet loss. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware intelligence, making it unsuitable for critical voice communications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN performance issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations and poor voice quality. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or provide application-aware intelligence, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic is efficiently routed over secondary paths. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and proactive traffic management.

 

Question 193

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance even during WAN degradation. By combining real-time monitoring with application-aware routing, SD-WAN ensures ERP and other essential applications are delivered reliably while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, leading to SLA violations, performance degradation, and potential business disruption. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching depends on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations, packet loss, and performance degradation. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware intelligence, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 194

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 195

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and potential operational impact. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 196

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications, such as ERP, including parameters like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance against these thresholds. When a link does not meet SLA requirements, ERP traffic is automatically rerouted over the most reliable link, such as MPLS, while non-critical traffic like email, web browsing, or file transfers is directed over lower-cost links such as broadband or LTE. Application-aware SLA routing combines real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization to ensure consistent performance for mission-critical applications while optimizing WAN resources. This automation reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees reliable performance under dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths for traffic and does not respond to WAN performance changes. If the primary link degrades due to congestion or packet loss, ERP traffic may still traverse the poor-quality link, leading to SLA violations, performance degradation, and potential business disruption. Static routing lacks automation, dynamic path selection, and application-aware intelligence, making it unsuitable for critical applications that require consistent SLA adherence.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the chance of human error, and can temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective measures are applied. Manual switching does not proactively monitor link performance or enforce application prioritization, which can lead to SLA violations and degraded performance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without consideration of application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not provide automation or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for mission-critical traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or cost-effective links. This proactive, automated approach guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance for critical applications. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 197

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality service. Non-critical traffic, including email, web browsing, and file transfers, continues using secondary or lower-cost links, optimizing bandwidth utilization. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces administrative intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications like VoIP. Combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization guarantees that voice traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN performance degradation. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a congested or degraded link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware intelligence, making it inadequate for critical voice communications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse suboptimal links, causing SLA violations and poor call quality. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or provide application-aware intelligence, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic always uses optimal links while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary paths efficiently. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduces administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and proactive traffic management.

Question 198

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another higher-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications maintain performance even during WAN degradation. Real-time monitoring combined with application-aware routing ensures ERP and other critical applications are delivered reliably while optimizing WAN resource utilization.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adjust to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations, performance degradation, and potential operational disruption. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and dynamic traffic management, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators detecting WAN issues and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations, packet loss, and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware intelligence, making it inadequate for mission-critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 199

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing WAN efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.

Question 200

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, minimize manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations, poor performance, and potential operational impact. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators detecting degraded links and rerouting traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it inadequate for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, and dynamic traffic management.