Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4  FCSS – SD-WAN 7.4 Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 4 Q 61- 80

Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 61

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to ensure ERP traffic always uses the most reliable link while general web traffic is routed over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications like ERP based on metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance in real time and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets the SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including general web browsing or email, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE. This approach optimizes bandwidth usage, reduces operational costs, and ensures that mission-critical applications maintain consistent performance. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN reduces administrative effort, maintains SLA compliance, and guarantees reliable application performance even during network fluctuations.

B) Static routing assigns fixed paths for traffic regardless of WAN link performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, leading to SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks flexibility, adaptability, and the ability to make intelligent path decisions based on real-time network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to monitor WAN link performance and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach is time-consuming, prone to human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. It is not practical for maintaining consistent SLA adherence in dynamic WAN environments.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all available WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, resulting in SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical application traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and delivers a consistent user experience. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 62

A company wants to maintain high-quality VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while sending less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link performance continuously, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. If a primary WAN link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds, VoIP traffic is automatically rerouted to the link that can maintain the required quality. Less critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, or file transfers, continues to use backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees that latency-sensitive traffic always receives optimal performance. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection ensures that VoIP calls maintain high quality even under changing network conditions.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may traverse congested or degraded links, causing packet loss, jitter, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot guarantee SLA adherence for latency-sensitive applications and does not provide dynamic rerouting.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect WAN link degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application requirements or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse links that are experiencing high latency or packet loss, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA enforcement, automation, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it provides intelligent, automated, real-time monitoring and rerouting of traffic. Critical VoIP traffic is guaranteed optimal performance while non-critical traffic utilizes secondary links efficiently. This approach ensures uninterrupted communications, maintains SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, and reduces administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, intelligent traffic management.

Question 63

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping less critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link metrics, including packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the primary broadband link experiences degradation beyond SLA thresholds, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical ERP traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Less critical traffic continues to use the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation ensures SLA compliance, minimizes manual intervention, and prioritizes mission-critical applications. Combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring allows SD-WAN to deliver reliable, consistent performance for critical applications while efficiently utilizing available network resources.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing the degraded broadband link, leading to SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks the dynamic optimization capabilities required for modern WAN environments.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the chance of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP performance before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it combines real-time monitoring, automated traffic rerouting, and intelligent application prioritization. Critical ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This approach guarantees SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve this level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 64

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links to reduce WAN expenses. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as file transfers or general web browsing, is routed over lower-cost links to optimize WAN usage and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining network efficiency. Application-aware routing reduces operational complexity, maintains SLA compliance, and guarantees that critical applications always receive optimal performance.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic regardless of link performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot dynamically enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the chance of errors, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse suboptimal or congested links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees that critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This ensures maximum WAN efficiency, maintains SLA compliance, reduces administrative overhead, and delivers uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 65

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic continues to use the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing ensure SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach guarantees that ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently utilizes secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance degradation. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is taken.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated approach guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 66

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending general web traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and automatically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing or email, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE. This optimizes WAN utilization, reduces operational costs, and ensures that mission-critical applications maintain consistent performance. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN reduces administrative effort, maintains SLA compliance, and guarantees reliable application performance even under dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing assigns fixed paths for traffic regardless of WAN link performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing cannot dynamically adjust to network conditions, making it unsuitable for critical traffic.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach is time-consuming, prone to human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. It does not provide real-time automation or proactive path selection.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and provides a consistent user experience. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of dynamic, intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 67

A company wants to maintain high-quality VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds, VoIP traffic is automatically rerouted to the link capable of maintaining the required performance. Less critical traffic, including web browsing, file transfers, or email, continues to use backup or lower-cost links. This approach ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees that latency-sensitive applications always receive optimal performance. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection ensures uninterrupted VoIP performance even under dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths regardless of link performance. VoIP traffic may traverse congested or degraded links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot dynamically optimize paths or maintain SLA compliance for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the chance of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action occurs.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application requirements or link quality. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it provides intelligent, automated, real-time monitoring and rerouting of traffic. Critical VoIP traffic is guaranteed optimal performance while non-critical traffic utilizes secondary links efficiently. This ensures uninterrupted communications, maintains SLA compliance, optimizes WAN usage, and reduces administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 68

A branch office experiences high jitter on its broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as jitter, latency, and packet loss. When the broadband link fails to meet SLA requirements for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Less critical traffic continues using the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth and cost efficiency. Automation guarantees SLA compliance, reduces administrative workload, and ensures mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN ensures reliable, consistent performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently utilizing available network resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization capabilities and cannot guarantee performance for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN link degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP performance before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, leading to poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it proactively combines real-time monitoring, automated traffic rerouting, and intelligent application prioritization. Critical ERP traffic is always routed over optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary links. This guarantees SLA compliance, optimizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and ensures consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 69

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links to reduce WAN expenses. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over the links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including general web browsing or file transfers, is sent over lower-cost links to optimize WAN usage and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while ensuring efficient use of available bandwidth. Application-aware routing reduces operational complexity, maintains SLA compliance, and ensures critical applications receive optimal performance under changing network conditions.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths for traffic and does not adjust to WAN performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and a poor user experience. Static routing cannot dynamically enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical traffic.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application performance or priority. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse suboptimal or congested links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic is routed over secondary or lower-cost links. This maximizes WAN efficiency, maintains SLA compliance, reduces administrative effort, and provides uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 70

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic continues to use the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing ensure SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive mechanism guarantees that ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance degradation. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in poor performance and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated approach guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 71

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to ensure ERP traffic always uses the most reliable link while general web traffic is routed over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications like ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets the SLA requirements. Less critical traffic, such as web browsing or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures that mission-critical applications receive optimal performance while optimizing WAN utilization and reducing operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach reduces administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains a consistent user experience even during network fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, leading to SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks flexibility and cannot respond dynamically to changing network conditions, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach is time-consuming, error-prone, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. It does not provide real-time automation or intelligent path selection.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, resulting in SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and provides consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 72

A company wants to maintain high-quality VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while sending less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link metrics continuously, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds, VoIP traffic is automatically rerouted to a link capable of maintaining required performance. Less critical traffic, such as email, file transfers, or web browsing, continues to use backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees that latency-sensitive applications always receive optimal performance. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection ensures uninterrupted VoIP quality even in dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN performance. VoIP traffic may traverse congested or degraded links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot guarantee SLA adherence for latency-sensitive traffic and does not provide dynamic rerouting capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect WAN link degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it provides intelligent, automated, real-time monitoring and rerouting of critical traffic. VoIP traffic is guaranteed optimal performance while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This ensures uninterrupted communications, maintains SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, and reduces administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of dynamic, intelligent traffic management.

Question 73

A branch office experiences high jitter on its broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link performance metrics including jitter, latency, and packet loss in real time. When the broadband link fails to meet SLA requirements for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues to use the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation guarantees SLA compliance, minimizes administrative effort, and ensures mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN ensures reliable, consistent ERP performance while efficiently using available network resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue traversing the degraded broadband link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization capabilities and cannot prioritize critical traffic.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP performance before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures mission-critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated approach guarantees SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve this level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 74

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over lower-cost links to reduce WAN expenses. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as general web browsing or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while efficiently utilizing available bandwidth. Application-aware routing reduces operational complexity, maintains SLA compliance, and guarantees that critical applications always receive optimal performance.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adjust to real-time WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot dynamically enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical traffic.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse suboptimal or congested links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This guarantees maximum WAN efficiency, SLA compliance, reduced administrative workload, and uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 75

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics, including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic continues using the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently utilizes secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance issues. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 76

A branch office has two WAN links: MPLS and broadband. The administrator wants SD-WAN to ensure ERP traffic is always routed over the link with the lowest latency while non-critical traffic is routed over the secondary link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When ERP traffic requires high-performance connectivity, SD-WAN automatically selects the link that meets SLA thresholds for latency-sensitive traffic. Non-critical traffic continues to use the secondary link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing operational costs. By automating path selection based on SLA compliance and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures critical applications like ERP operate without interruption, providing consistent performance even when primary links experience congestion or degradation. This intelligent approach reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and improves the overall user experience by proactively managing traffic flow across multiple WAN links.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths for traffic and does not adapt to real-time network performance. ERP traffic may continue using a high-latency or degraded link, resulting in poor performance, SLA violations, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and cannot respond proactively to changing network conditions.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP operations before corrective action is implemented. Manual failover cannot guarantee consistent application performance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across available WAN links without considering application priority or performance metrics. Critical ERP traffic may traverse a degraded link, resulting in increased latency, packet loss, and SLA violations. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic is always routed over the optimal link while non-critical traffic utilizes secondary links efficiently. This proactive, automated solution ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of dynamic, intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 77

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic even when one WAN link degrades, while non-critical traffic is sent over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature constantly monitors WAN link performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link that maintains the required quality. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, or file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees optimal performance for latency-sensitive applications like VoIP. By combining real-time monitoring, application prioritization, and automated rerouting, SLA-based dynamic path selection delivers uninterrupted call quality while optimizing WAN usage.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot dynamically respond to WAN performance fluctuations. VoIP traffic may traverse congested or degraded links, leading to jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot maintain SLA compliance or provide real-time optimization for critical applications.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application requirements or link performance. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it provides intelligent, real-time monitoring, automated rerouting, and application prioritization. Critical VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic utilizes secondary paths efficiently. This ensures uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual traffic switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

 

Question 78

A branch office has three WAN links. The administrator wants ERP traffic to always use the most reliable link while non-critical traffic is routed over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic is routed over lower-cost links such as broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures critical applications receive optimal performance while minimizing administrative effort. This approach guarantees SLA compliance and consistent user experience even during network fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks flexibility and cannot respond dynamically to changing network conditions.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP operations. Manual failover cannot maintain consistent SLA compliance.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations and performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive mechanism guarantees SLA compliance, optimizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 79

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted video conferencing while sending non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over the links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost backup links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees optimal performance for critical applications under dynamic WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths and does not adjust to real-time WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing packet loss, jitter, and a poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during network issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic utilizes backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and provides uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 80

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss, while non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link to optimize bandwidth utilization and minimize costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated solution ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.