Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4  FCSS – SD-WAN 7.4 Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q  81- 100

Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 81

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending general web traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications like ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing, email, or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures critical applications receive optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency and reducing operational costs. This approach reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains a consistent user experience even during dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time network performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and cannot respond proactively to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. Manual switching does not provide real-time automation or intelligent path selection.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, leading to SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 82

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while sending less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link capable of maintaining required quality. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, or file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees optimal performance for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection ensures uninterrupted VoIP communications even under fluctuating WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to real-time network performance. VoIP traffic may traverse congested or degraded links, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot guarantee SLA compliance or provide dynamic rerouting for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or performance metrics. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it provides intelligent, automated, real-time monitoring and rerouting of critical traffic. VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This ensures uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 83

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link performance metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA requirements for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues using the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation ensures SLA compliance, minimizes manual intervention, and guarantees that mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN ensures reliable and consistent performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, leading to SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization and cannot respond proactively to network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it proactively ensures mission-critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This approach guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 84

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including general web browsing or file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing reduces administrative effort, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees optimal performance for critical applications under dynamic WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adjust to real-time WAN performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and ensures uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 85

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing SLA violations and performance issues. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated mechanism ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 86

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to ensure ERP traffic always uses the most reliable link while non-critical traffic is routed over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing, file transfers, or email, is sent over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures that mission-critical applications receive optimal performance while optimizing WAN utilization and reducing operational costs. Automation reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains consistent user experience even during dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic regardless of link performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and cannot respond proactively to changing network conditions, making it unsuitable for latency-sensitive applications.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach is time-consuming, error-prone, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. It does not provide real-time automation or intelligent path selection.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, causing SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative workload, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 87

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link capable of maintaining required performance. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, or file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees optimal performance for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection delivers uninterrupted VoIP communications while efficiently using WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to WAN performance fluctuations. VoIP traffic may traverse congested or degraded links, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot guarantee SLA compliance or dynamic rerouting for critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or performance metrics. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 88

A branch office experiences high jitter on its broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as jitter, latency, and packet loss. When the broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues to use the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation ensures SLA compliance, minimizes manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications like ERP receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN ensures reliable and consistent performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and potential user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization and cannot respond proactively to network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 89

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is sent over lower-cost backup links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees optimal performance for critical applications under dynamic WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adjust to real-time WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic utilizes backup or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and provides uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 90

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and performance issues. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated mechanism ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 91

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending general web traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors the performance of all WAN links and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing, email, or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures that mission-critical applications receive optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. This automation reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains consistent user experience even during network fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time network performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, leading to SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. It does not provide intelligent, real-time path selection.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, resulting in SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 92

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link capable of maintaining optimal performance. Non-critical traffic, such as email, file transfers, or web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees uninterrupted operation for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection ensures that VoIP traffic receives high-quality, uninterrupted service while efficiently using WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN performance fluctuations. VoIP traffic may traverse degraded links, causing jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot guarantee SLA compliance or dynamic rerouting for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for errors, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 93

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature monitors WAN link performance metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter in real time. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues to use the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation ensures SLA compliance, minimizes manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN ensures reliable and consistent performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and potential user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization and cannot respond proactively to network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 94

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees optimal performance for critical applications under dynamic WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adjust to real-time WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic utilizes backup or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and provides uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 95

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and performance issues. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated mechanism ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 96

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending general web traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature enables administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing, email, or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures mission-critical applications receive optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains a consistent user experience even during dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time network performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and cannot respond proactively to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. It does not provide intelligent, real-time path selection.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, causing SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 97

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link capable of maintaining optimal performance. Non-critical traffic, including email, file transfers, or web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees uninterrupted operation for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection ensures that VoIP traffic receives high-quality, uninterrupted service while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN performance fluctuations. VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot guarantee SLA compliance or dynamic rerouting for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for errors, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or performance metrics. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 98

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues using the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation ensures SLA compliance, minimizes manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN ensures reliable and consistent performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and potential user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization and cannot respond proactively to network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 99

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost backup links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees optimal performance for critical applications even under dynamic WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adjust to real-time WAN performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and provides uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 100

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated solution ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.