Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4  FCSS – SD-WAN 7.4 Architect  Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q 101- 120 

Visit here for our full Fortinet FCSS_SDW_AR-7.4 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 101

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending general web traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP based on latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing, email, or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE, optimizing bandwidth utilization and reducing operational costs. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures that mission-critical applications receive optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. This automation reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains consistent user experience even during network fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time network performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions.

C) Manual traffic switching requires administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. It does not provide intelligent, real-time path selection.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing high jitter, packet loss, or congestion, causing SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time monitoring, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 102

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link degrades or fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link capable of maintaining optimal performance. Non-critical traffic, including email, web browsing, or file transfers, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees uninterrupted operation for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection ensures that VoIP traffic receives high-quality service while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to WAN performance fluctuations. VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in jitter, packet loss, and dropped calls. Static routing cannot guarantee SLA compliance or dynamic rerouting for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the potential for errors, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in poor call quality. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures critical VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative workload. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 103

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues using the broadband link, optimizing bandwidth utilization and cost efficiency. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees that mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. By combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring, SD-WAN ensures reliable and consistent performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and potential user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization and cannot respond proactively to network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees mission-critical ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, application-aware traffic management.

Question 104

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost backup links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and guarantees optimal performance for critical applications even under dynamic WAN conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adjust to real-time WAN performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, causing packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or prioritize critical applications.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN performance issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, resulting in performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and provides uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 105

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link degrades beyond SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic traffic optimization capabilities.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing lacks automation, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This intelligent, automated solution ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of dynamic, real-time, application-aware traffic management.

Question 106

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, considering metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors the performance of all WAN links and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing, email, or file transfers, is sent over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. The combination of real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization ensures mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative overhead, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains a consistent user experience even in dynamic network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing does not offer dynamic optimization or intelligent path selection, making it unsuitable for mission-critical application management.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This approach is reactive, time-consuming, and prone to human error. It cannot respond proactively to changing link conditions, leading to possible ERP service disruption during WAN failures or performance drops.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all available WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, leading to SLA violations, packet loss, or jitter. Equal load balancing lacks automation, real-time performance monitoring, and application-aware decision-making, making it insufficient for ensuring critical application reliability.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or cost-effective links. This automated, proactive mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, application-aware traffic management.

Question 107

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link experiences degradation and fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link that can maintain high-quality performance. Non-critical traffic, such as email, file transfers, or general web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource usage.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue using a degraded or congested link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, or dropped calls. Static routing lacks dynamic rerouting or SLA enforcement capabilities, making it unsuitable for mission-critical voice applications.

C) Manual failover depends on administrators to detect WAN degradation and manually reroute traffic. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic across all WAN links without considering application priority or performance metrics. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing reduced call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce application-aware routing or SLA monitoring, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This approach guarantees uninterrupted communications, maintains SLA compliance, optimizes WAN usage, and reduces administrative effort. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 108

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic remains on the broadband link to optimize bandwidth usage and reduce costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, minimizes manual effort, and guarantees that mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. Combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring allows SD-WAN to maintain reliable performance for ERP and other critical applications while using available WAN resources efficiently.

B) Static routing defines fixed paths for traffic and does not adapt to changing WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, slow performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks real-time path optimization and cannot respond proactively to network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in poor performance, SLA violations, and suboptimal user experience. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, application prioritization, or automated path selection.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 109

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is routed over lower-cost backup links to optimize WAN utilization and reduce operational costs. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted high-quality video communication while maximizing efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing minimizes administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and provides optimal performance for critical applications even during network fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN performance. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, leading to jitter, packet loss, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or application prioritization.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and manually reroute traffic. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse suboptimal or degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for mission-critical video traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it ensures critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This guarantees SLA compliance, optimizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 110

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and minimizing costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive mechanism ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks automation, dynamic path selection, and SLA enforcement, making it unsuitable for mission-critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations, jitter, and performance issues. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical ERP traffic.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, real-time traffic management.

Question 111

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to automatically route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, considering metrics like latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors all WAN links and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing, email, or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SD-WAN ensures mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative effort, guarantees SLA compliance, and maintains consistent user experience even during network fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides predetermined paths and cannot adapt to real-time WAN performance. ERP traffic may continue traversing degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations, poor application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks the capability for dynamic optimization and intelligent path selection.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. Manual switching is not proactive or intelligent.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing congestion or packet loss, leading to SLA violations and degraded performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, application-aware routing or SLA enforcement.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive mechanism ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative workload, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 112

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing less critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link experiences degradation and fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to the link that can maintain high-quality performance. Non-critical traffic, such as email, file transfers, or web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while optimizing WAN resource usage.

B) Static routing uses fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue using a degraded or congested link, resulting in jitter, packet loss, or dropped calls. Static routing lacks dynamic rerouting or SLA enforcement capabilities, making it unsuitable for mission-critical voice applications.

C) Manual failover depends on administrators to detect WAN degradation and manually reroute traffic. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective actions are applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic across all WAN links without considering application priority or performance metrics. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing reduced call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce application-aware routing or SLA monitoring, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal links while non-critical traffic uses secondary paths efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, maintains SLA compliance, optimizes WAN usage, and reduces administrative effort. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 113

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues using the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and minimize costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. Combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring allows SD-WAN to maintain reliable performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently using WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, poor performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks dynamic optimization and cannot respond proactively to real-time network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations and performance issues. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This proactive, automated approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 114

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as web browsing or file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach ensures uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maintaining efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing minimizes administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and ensures optimal performance for critical applications even during WAN performance fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or application prioritization.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and manually reroute traffic. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for mission-critical video traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same level of intelligent, automated traffic management.

Question 115

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and poor performance. Static routing lacks dynamic path selection, SLA monitoring, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and performance issues. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical ERP traffic.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, automated, real-time traffic management.

Question 116

A branch office has three WAN links: MPLS, broadband, and LTE. The administrator wants SD-WAN to route ERP traffic over the most reliable link while sending non-critical traffic over lower-cost links. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. This feature allows administrators to define SLA thresholds for critical applications such as ERP, including latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors the performance of all WAN links and dynamically routes ERP traffic over the link that meets SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, such as email, web browsing, or file transfers, is routed over lower-cost links like broadband or LTE to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational costs. The combination of real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization ensures that mission-critical applications maintain optimal performance while maximizing WAN efficiency. Automation reduces administrative workload, guarantees SLA compliance, and provides a consistent user experience even under fluctuating network conditions.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths for traffic and cannot adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using degraded or congested links, resulting in SLA violations, slow application performance, and user dissatisfaction. Static routing does not provide dynamic optimization or intelligent path selection, making it inadequate for mission-critical application requirements.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN issues and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the likelihood of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied. Manual switching cannot proactively respond to changing network conditions, making it unsuitable for dynamic, SLA-sensitive traffic.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Latency-sensitive ERP traffic may traverse links experiencing congestion, packet loss, or jitter, leading to SLA violations and degraded application performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automation, real-time monitoring, or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for critical application traffic management.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal path while non-critical traffic uses secondary or cost-effective links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, optimizes WAN utilization, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot achieve the same intelligent, dynamic, and automated traffic management.

Question 117

A company wants to maintain uninterrupted VoIP traffic across multiple WAN links while routing non-critical traffic over backup paths. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link performance metrics such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. When a primary link experiences degradation and fails to meet SLA thresholds for VoIP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes voice traffic to a link capable of maintaining high-quality performance. Non-critical traffic, including email, file transfers, or general web browsing, continues using backup or lower-cost links. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and provides uninterrupted service for latency-sensitive applications. By combining real-time monitoring, automated path selection, and application prioritization, SLA-based dynamic path selection guarantees that VoIP traffic receives consistent, high-quality service while efficiently utilizing WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to changing WAN conditions. VoIP traffic may continue traversing a degraded or congested link, resulting in packet loss, jitter, or dropped calls. Static routing lacks SLA enforcement, real-time monitoring, and automated rerouting, making it unsuitable for mission-critical voice applications.

C) Manual failover depends on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of human error, and may temporarily disrupt VoIP communications before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link performance. Critical VoIP traffic may traverse degraded or suboptimal links, causing reduced call quality and SLA violations. Equal load balancing does not enforce SLA thresholds or application-aware routing, making it insufficient for latency-sensitive applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based dynamic path selection with application prioritization is that it ensures VoIP traffic is always routed over optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses secondary links efficiently. This guarantees uninterrupted communications, SLA compliance, WAN optimization, and reduced administrative effort. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot deliver the same level of intelligent, automated, and real-time traffic management.

Question 118

A branch office experiences high packet loss on its primary broadband link. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically to MPLS while keeping non-critical traffic on broadband. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual traffic switching
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including packet loss, latency, and jitter. When the primary broadband link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to MPLS or another high-quality link. Non-critical traffic continues using the broadband link to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce costs. Automation ensures SLA compliance, reduces manual intervention, and guarantees that mission-critical applications receive priority over non-critical traffic. Combining application-aware routing with real-time monitoring allows SD-WAN to maintain reliable performance for ERP and other critical applications while efficiently utilizing available WAN resources.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adapt to WAN degradation. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded broadband link, resulting in SLA violations, slow application performance, and potential user dissatisfaction. Static routing lacks real-time path optimization and cannot proactively respond to network issues.

C) Manual traffic switching relies on administrators to detect WAN degradation and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Critical ERP traffic may traverse degraded or congested links, causing SLA violations, packet loss, and poor application performance. Equal load balancing does not provide SLA monitoring, automation, or application-aware routing.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic continues using secondary or lower-cost links. This automated, proactive approach ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent performance. Static routing, manual switching, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same intelligent, dynamic traffic management.

Question 119

A company wants to maintain high-quality video conferencing while routing non-critical traffic over backup links to reduce WAN costs. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) Application-aware SLA routing
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Application-aware SLA routing is correct. Administrators can define SLA thresholds for video conferencing such as latency, jitter, and packet loss. SD-WAN continuously monitors WAN link performance and dynamically routes video traffic over links that meet SLA requirements. Non-critical traffic, including web browsing and file transfers, is routed over backup or lower-cost links to optimize bandwidth utilization and reduce operational expenses. This proactive, automated approach guarantees uninterrupted, high-quality video communication while maximizing efficient use of network resources. Application-aware routing reduces administrative workload, ensures SLA compliance, and maintains optimal performance for critical applications even during WAN performance fluctuations.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and cannot adjust to dynamic WAN conditions. Video conferencing may traverse degraded or congested links, resulting in packet loss, jitter, and poor user experience. Static routing cannot enforce SLA thresholds or application prioritization.

C) Manual failover requires administrators to detect WAN degradation and manually reroute traffic. This reactive method introduces delays, increases the likelihood of human error, and may temporarily disrupt video communications during WAN issues.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across all WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. Latency-sensitive video traffic may traverse degraded links, causing performance degradation. Equal load balancing lacks SLA enforcement, automation, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for mission-critical video traffic.

The reasoning for selecting application-aware SLA routing is that it guarantees critical video traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic uses backup or lower-cost links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains uninterrupted application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, real-time traffic management.

Question 120

A branch office has two WAN links. The administrator wants SD-WAN to reroute ERP traffic automatically when the primary link experiences packet loss while keeping non-critical traffic on the degraded link. Which Fortinet SD-WAN feature should be implemented?

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization
B) Static routing
C) Manual failover
D) Equal load balancing

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is correct. This feature continuously monitors WAN link metrics including latency, jitter, and packet loss. When the primary link fails to meet SLA thresholds for ERP traffic, SD-WAN automatically reroutes critical traffic to the secondary or higher-quality link, ensuring uninterrupted business operations. Non-critical traffic remains on the degraded link, optimizing bandwidth usage and reducing operational costs. Automation and application-aware routing guarantee SLA compliance, reduce manual intervention, and maintain consistent performance for mission-critical applications. This proactive approach ensures ERP traffic always uses optimal paths while non-critical traffic efficiently uses secondary links.

B) Static routing provides fixed paths and does not adapt to real-time WAN conditions. ERP traffic may continue using the degraded link, causing SLA violations and performance issues. Static routing lacks automated path selection, SLA enforcement, and application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical ERP traffic.

C) Manual failover relies on administrators to detect degraded links and reroute traffic manually. This reactive approach introduces delays, increases the risk of errors, and may temporarily disrupt ERP traffic before corrective action is applied.

D) Equal load balancing distributes traffic evenly across WAN links without considering application priority or link quality. ERP traffic may traverse degraded links, resulting in SLA violations and poor performance. Equal load balancing does not provide automated, intelligent, or application-aware routing, making it unsuitable for critical applications.

The reasoning for selecting SLA-based automatic path selection with application prioritization is that it guarantees ERP traffic always uses the optimal link while non-critical traffic continues using secondary links. This ensures SLA compliance, maximizes WAN efficiency, reduces administrative effort, and maintains consistent application performance. Static routing, manual failover, and equal load balancing cannot provide the same level of intelligent, automated, real-time traffic management.