Google  Professional Data Engineer on Google Cloud Platform Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q 121- 140 

Visit here for our full Google Professional Data Engineer exam dumps and practice test questions.

Q121

A company wants to implement a real-time analytics pipeline for mobile app user events. The system must ingest millions of events per second, guarantee exact-once processing, perform session-based aggregations, and support low-latency dashboards for marketing campaigns. Which architecture is most suitable?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery provide a fully managed, serverless architecture ideal for high-throughput, real-time analytics of mobile app events. Cloud Pub/Sub is capable of ingesting millions of events per second, such as screen views, button clicks, and feature interactions. Its auto-scaling and durable storage ensure no data loss during traffic spikes, such as during product launches or promotional campaigns.

Dataflow, built on Apache Beam, offers exactly-once processing semantics, ensuring deduplication, checkpointing, and stateful processing. This is critical for accurate session-based aggregations, which are required to compute metrics like session duration, retention, and feature usage. Dataflow supports windowed and session-based processing, enabling near real-time computation for dashboards and automated alerts.

BigQuery stores both raw and aggregated data, providing low-latency analytics for dashboards, ad hoc queries, and reporting. Its serverless columnar architecture allows petabyte-scale datasets to be queried without managing infrastructure. Integrations with visualization tools like Looker or Data Studio enable marketing teams to see near real-time engagement trends, campaign effectiveness, and user segmentation. This architecture minimizes operational overhead while providing reliable, scalable real-time analytics.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented. Data must first be written to storage and then processed via Dataproc, introducing latency unsuitable for real-time marketing dashboards. Dataproc clusters require manual scaling, and exactly-once processing is not guaranteed.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery cannot scale to millions of events per second. Cloud SQL is optimized for transactional workloads, and Cloud Functions have execution and memory limits. Implementing exactly-once processing and windowed aggregations at scale would require complex orchestration.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery can store raw events efficiently but lacks distributed stream processing and exactly-once semantics. Aggregations and low-latency dashboards would require additional orchestration, increasing complexity and risk of inconsistent analytics.

Q122

A company wants to store IoT telemetry data in BigQuery. Queries often filter by timestamp, device type, and region. The dataset will grow to multiple petabytes. Which table design is optimal for performance and cost efficiency?

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and region

B) Partition by device type and cluster by timestamp

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create multiple tables per device type and region

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and region

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion timestamp ensures that queries filtered by time scan only relevant partitions, reducing data scanned and lowering cost. Clustering by device type and region organizes data physically within each partition, improving performance for queries that filter or aggregate by these fields. This design scales efficiently for multi-petabyte datasets, maintaining query performance even as the dataset grows.

A single partitioned and clustered table simplifies operational management. Partitioned and clustered tables support both streaming and batch ingestion, enabling real-time anomaly detection, trend analysis, and predictive maintenance. BigQuery automatically manages partition metadata, optimizes queries, and scales storage and compute seamlessly. This approach is particularly effective for IoT telemetry, where queries frequently involve multiple dimensions like device type, region, and time.

B) Partitioning by device type creates numerous small partitions, which increases metadata overhead and reduces query performance. Clustering by timestamp alone does not optimize common access patterns filtered by region.

C) A single unpartitioned table is inefficient for petabyte-scale datasets. Queries filtered by timestamp, device type, or region would scan the entire table, resulting in higher costs and slower performance.

D) Multiple tables per device type and region increase operational complexity. Schema evolution, cross-device queries, and table maintenance become cumbersome, and queries across multiple tables require unions or joins, reducing efficiency and increasing the risk of errors.

Q123

A company wants to implement a GDPR-compliant analytics pipeline in BigQuery. Customer PII must be automatically detected, masked, or anonymized while still allowing analytics. Which GCP service is most suitable?

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

B) Cloud KMS

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)

D) Cloud Functions

Answer

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is purpose-built for detecting, classifying, and transforming sensitive data such as PII. It integrates seamlessly with BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub. DLP provides pre-configured detectors for names, emails, phone numbers, social security numbers, and financial information. Transformations such as masking, tokenization, redaction, and format-preserving encryption allow analytics on anonymized datasets while protecting sensitive information.

DLP transformations can occur inline during ingestion or query execution, reducing operational overhead while ensuring GDPR compliance. Audit logs provide traceability, documenting how PII is detected and transformed. The service scales to petabyte-level datasets, supporting large-scale analytics pipelines. This automation ensures consistent protection of sensitive data, reduces operational risk, and enables compliance with regulations while still providing actionable insights.

B) Cloud KMS secures encryption keys but does not detect or transform PII. It cannot ensure GDPR-compliant analytics.

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy secures access to applications but does not provide data anonymization or detection, making it insufficient for GDPR analytics compliance.

D) Cloud Functions can implement custom PII detection and masking, but it requires significant development and is less scalable. DLP provides built-in, automated, and reliable protection for large-scale datasets.

Q124

A company wants to monitor BigQuery query costs and trigger near real-time alerts for expensive queries. The solution must be serverless, scalable, and low-maintenance. Which approach is most suitable?

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

B) Query BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually

C) Export logs to Cloud Storage and process offline

D) Store query metadata in Bigtable and poll for alerts

Answer

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

Explanation

A) INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables contain metadata about BigQuery jobs, including execution time, bytes processed, and costs. Cloud Functions can periodically query these tables to identify expensive queries and trigger alerts via Pub/Sub, email, or other channels. This fully serverless architecture scales automatically with query volume and requires minimal operational effort. It allows near real-time monitoring and proactive cost management.

Custom thresholds can be set to monitor specific queries, users, or workloads. Using serverless Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub ensures reliable, low-maintenance alerting without managing infrastructure. It is cost-effective and aligns with best practices for monitoring query costs in large-scale BigQuery environments.

B) Querying BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually is not scalable. Cloud SQL cannot efficiently handle large volumes of metadata, and manual processes introduce latency, preventing near real-time alerts.

C) Exporting logs to Cloud Storage and processing offline introduces delays, making near real-time alerts impractical.

D) Storing metadata in Bigtable and polling for alerts increases operational complexity. Polling and orchestration add unnecessary overhead compared to a serverless Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub solution.

Q125

A company wants to implement a multi-tenant SaaS analytics solution on BigQuery. Each tenant’s data must remain isolated, but occasional cross-tenant queries are required. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design is most suitable?

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant

C) Store data in Cloud SQL and replicate to BigQuery

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant

Answer

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

Explanation

A) A single table with a tenant_id column and clustering by tenant_id is the most effective design for multi-tenant SaaS analytics on BigQuery. Clustering improves query performance for filtering and aggregation by tenant. Partitioning by ingestion timestamp optimizes queries filtered by time ranges. This design scales to petabyte-level datasets without the overhead of managing multiple tables or projects. Cross-tenant queries are efficient, requiring only filtering or grouping by tenant_id.

Centralized schema evolution ensures consistency, while BigQuery’s serverless architecture manages scaling, metadata, and query optimization automatically. This approach minimizes operational complexity, reduces cost, and delivers high performance for large-scale multi-tenant SaaS analytics environments. It supports both operational dashboards and ad hoc queries across tenants efficiently.

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant introduces significant operational complexity, including billing, IAM management, and schema maintenance. Cross-tenant queries are cumbersome and inefficient.

C) Storing data in Cloud SQL and replicating to BigQuery introduces latency and operational complexity, making it unsuitable for petabyte-scale multi-tenant analytics.

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant increase operational overhead. Queries across multiple tables require unions and are error-prone, reducing efficiency and maintainability.

Q126

A company wants to build a real-time analytics pipeline for smart home sensor data. The system must ingest millions of events per second, guarantee exactly-once processing, perform windowed aggregations, and support low-latency dashboards for monitoring device activity and anomalies. Which architecture is most suitable?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery form a fully managed, serverless architecture capable of ingesting millions of smart home sensor events per second, including temperature, motion, door/window status, and appliance usage metrics. Cloud Pub/Sub handles massive data throughput, auto-scales during peak events, and provides durable message storage, ensuring that no events are lost even during spikes in activity, such as during home automation routines or security alerts.

Dataflow ensures exactly-once processing through checkpointing, deduplication, and stateful transformations. This is critical for analytics accuracy; for instance, miscounted motion events could falsely indicate anomalies or trigger unnecessary alerts. Dataflow also supports windowed aggregations and session-based processing. This allows computation of metrics like hourly energy consumption per household, average device usage, anomaly detection in temperature readings, or motion patterns over defined windows, all essential for predictive analytics and smart home automation optimization.

BigQuery serves as the analytics layer, storing both raw telemetry data and aggregated metrics. Its serverless, columnar architecture scales seamlessly to petabyte-level datasets and supports low-latency queries for dashboards, real-time alerts, and historical analysis. Dashboards can refresh in near real-time, enabling users to monitor home automation, energy consumption, or device behavior. Integrations with BI tools like Looker or Data Studio enhance visualization and decision-making capabilities.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented. Events must be first written to storage and processed in batches, introducing latency unsuitable for real-time smart home monitoring. Dataproc clusters require manual scaling and management, and exactly-once semantics are not guaranteed, which could lead to inaccuracies in anomaly detection or energy usage metrics.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery cannot scale to millions of events per second. Cloud SQL is designed for transactional workloads, and Cloud Functions have execution and memory limits. Implementing exactly-once processing and windowed aggregations would require complex orchestration and introduce operational risk.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery can store raw sensor data efficiently but lacks distributed stream processing and exactly-once semantics. Windowed aggregations and low-latency dashboards would require additional orchestration, increasing complexity, latency, and the potential for inconsistent analytics.

Q127

A company wants to store IoT telemetry data in BigQuery for analytics. Queries frequently filter by timestamp, device type, and location. The dataset is expected to grow to petabytes. Which table design is most suitable for performance and cost efficiency?

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and location

B) Partition by device type and cluster by timestamp

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create multiple tables per device type and location

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and location

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion timestamp ensures that queries filtered by time scan only relevant partitions, minimizing data scanned and reducing cost. Clustering by device type and location organizes the rows physically within partitions, optimizing queries that filter or aggregate by these dimensions. This design scales efficiently for multi-petabyte datasets, maintaining consistent query performance even as data grows.

A single partitioned and clustered table reduces operational overhead, eliminating the need to manage multiple tables or datasets. Partitioned and clustered tables support both streaming and batch ingestion, enabling real-time anomaly detection, trend analysis, and predictive maintenance. BigQuery automatically manages partition metadata, optimizes query execution, and scales storage and compute seamlessly. This approach is particularly effective for IoT telemetry, where queries often involve multiple dimensions like device type, location, and time.

B) Partitioning by device type creates numerous small partitions, increasing metadata overhead and reducing query performance. Clustering by timestamp alone does not optimize common queries filtered by location.

C) A single unpartitioned table is inefficient for petabyte-scale datasets. Queries filtered by timestamp, device type, or location would scan the entire table, leading to high costs and slow performance.

D) Multiple tables per device type and location increase operational complexity. Schema evolution, cross-device or cross-location queries, and table maintenance become cumbersome. Queries across multiple tables require unions or joins, reducing efficiency and increasing the risk of errors.

Q128

A company wants to implement a GDPR-compliant analytics pipeline in BigQuery. Customer PII must be automatically detected, masked, or anonymized while still allowing analytics. Which GCP service is most suitable?

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

B) Cloud KMS

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)

D) Cloud Functions

Answer

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is designed to detect, classify, and transform sensitive data such as PII. It integrates with BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub, allowing large-scale processing of datasets while ensuring compliance with GDPR. DLP provides pre-built detectors for common PII types including names, email addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers, and financial data. Transformations include masking, tokenization, redaction, and format-preserving encryption, enabling analytics on anonymized datasets while protecting sensitive information.

DLP transformations can be applied inline during ingestion or during query execution, reducing operational overhead and ensuring GDPR compliance. Audit logs provide traceability, documenting how PII was detected, transformed, and accessed. Cloud DLP can scale to petabyte-level datasets, ensuring reliable automated protection for large-scale analytics pipelines. It reduces operational risk, ensures consistent enforcement of data protection policies, and supports regulatory reporting while allowing meaningful analytics and insights.

B) Cloud KMS secures encryption keys for data at rest but does not detect or anonymize PII. It cannot ensure GDPR compliance for analytics pipelines.

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy secures access to applications but does not provide automated PII detection or transformation, making it unsuitable for GDPR-compliant analytics.

D) Cloud Functions can implement custom PII detection and masking logic but require significant development effort and lack built-in automation, making them less reliable and less scalable than Cloud DLP.

Q129

A company wants to monitor BigQuery query costs and trigger near real-time alerts for expensive queries. The solution must be serverless, scalable, and low-maintenance. Which approach is most effective?

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

B) Query BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually

C) Export logs to Cloud Storage and process offline

D) Store query metadata in Bigtable and poll for alerts

Answer

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

Explanation

A) INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables provide metadata about BigQuery jobs, including query execution time, bytes processed, and costs. Cloud Functions can periodically query these tables to identify expensive queries and trigger alerts through Pub/Sub, email, or other notification mechanisms. This approach is fully serverless, scales automatically with query volume, and requires minimal operational effort.

Custom thresholds can be defined to monitor specific users, workloads, or query patterns. This serverless solution allows near real-time monitoring, enabling proactive cost management. Using Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub reduces operational overhead, eliminates the need for managing servers, and ensures reliable, low-latency alerting. It is cost-effective and aligns with best practices for monitoring large-scale BigQuery environments.

B) Querying BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually is not scalable. Cloud SQL cannot efficiently handle large volumes of metadata, and manual processes introduce latency that prevents real-time alerts.

C) Exporting logs to Cloud Storage and processing offline introduces delays, making near real-time monitoring impractical.

D) Storing query metadata in Bigtable and polling for alerts adds complexity. Polling and orchestration increase operational overhead compared to serverless Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub.

Q130

A company wants to implement a multi-tenant SaaS analytics solution on BigQuery. Each tenant’s data must remain isolated, but occasional cross-tenant queries are required. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design is most suitable?

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant

C) Store data in Cloud SQL and replicate to BigQuery

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant

Answer

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

Explanation

A) A single table with a tenant_id column and clustering by tenant_id is the most scalable and operationally efficient design for multi-tenant SaaS analytics. Clustering organizes rows by tenant, improving performance for queries filtered by tenant or aggregated across tenants. Partitioning by ingestion timestamp further optimizes queries filtered by date ranges. This design scales to petabyte-level datasets without creating multiple tables or projects, minimizing operational overhead.

Cross-tenant queries are straightforward, requiring only filtering or grouping by tenant_id. Centralized schema management ensures consistent evolution of data models. BigQuery’s serverless architecture handles scaling, metadata management, and query optimization automatically. This approach minimizes cost, maintains high performance, and supports operational dashboards and ad hoc analytics across tenants. It is ideal for large-scale SaaS environments, providing both isolation and analytical flexibility.

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant increases operational complexity, including billing management, IAM configuration, and schema evolution. Cross-tenant queries are cumbersome and inefficient.

C) Storing data in Cloud SQL and replicating to BigQuery introduces latency and operational complexity, making it unsuitable for petabyte-scale multi-tenant analytics.

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant increase operational overhead. Queries across many tables require unions or joins, reducing efficiency and maintainability.

Q131

A company wants to implement a real-time analytics pipeline for e-commerce clickstream data. The system must ingest millions of events per second, guarantee exactly-once processing, perform session-based and windowed aggregations, and support low-latency dashboards for conversion and engagement metrics. Which architecture is most suitable?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery form a fully managed, serverless solution capable of ingesting millions of e-commerce clickstream events per second, including page views, product clicks, add-to-cart events, and purchases. Cloud Pub/Sub automatically scales to accommodate sudden spikes in traffic, such as during flash sales or marketing campaigns, and provides durable message storage with acknowledgments to ensure reliable delivery.

Dataflow, based on Apache Beam, provides exactly-once processing semantics, which guarantees that events are not double-counted, ensuring accurate metrics for conversion rates, funnel analytics, and customer engagement. Dataflow also supports windowed aggregations and session-based processing, enabling calculations like average session duration, cart abandonment rates, and clickstream patterns. Session-based aggregations allow businesses to group events by user sessions, providing a clear picture of engagement and behavioral trends.

BigQuery acts as the analytics layer, storing both raw and aggregated data. Its columnar, serverless architecture scales seamlessly to petabyte-scale datasets, supporting low-latency queries for dashboards and reporting. Integration with BI tools like Looker or Data Studio enables near real-time visualization of engagement, conversion metrics, and campaign effectiveness. This architecture minimizes operational overhead while providing highly scalable, real-time analytics.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented. Events must be stored first and processed later, introducing latency unsuitable for real-time dashboards. Dataproc clusters require manual management, and exactly-once semantics are not guaranteed.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery cannot handle millions of events per second. Cloud SQL is optimized for transactional workloads, and Cloud Functions have execution and memory limits. Implementing exactly-once processing and session-based aggregations at scale would require complex orchestration.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery can store raw clickstream data efficiently but lacks stream processing and exactly-once semantics. Windowed aggregations and real-time dashboards would require additional orchestration, increasing complexity and latency.

Q132

A company wants to store IoT telemetry data in BigQuery for analytics. Queries often filter by timestamp, device type, and geographic region. The dataset is expected to grow to petabytes. Which table design is most suitable for performance and cost efficiency?

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and region

B) Partition by device type and cluster by timestamp

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create multiple tables per device type and region

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and region

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion timestamp ensures queries filtered by time scan only relevant partitions, reducing data scanned and lowering costs. Clustering by device type and region organizes rows physically within partitions, improving performance for queries filtered by these dimensions. This design is highly scalable for multi-petabyte datasets and maintains consistent query performance even as data grows.

A single partitioned and clustered table simplifies operational management. It supports both streaming and batch ingestion, enabling real-time anomaly detection, trend analysis, and predictive maintenance. BigQuery automatically manages partition metadata, optimizes query execution, and scales storage and compute seamlessly. This approach is ideal for IoT telemetry where queries often involve multiple dimensions such as device type, region, and timestamp.

B) Partitioning by device type creates many small partitions, increasing metadata overhead and reducing query performance. Clustering by timestamp alone does not optimize common access patterns filtered by region.

C) A single unpartitioned table is inefficient at petabyte scale. Queries filtered by timestamp, device type, or region would scan the entire table, leading to higher costs and slower performance.

D) Multiple tables per device type and region increase operational complexity. Schema evolution, cross-device queries, and table maintenance become cumbersome. Queries across multiple tables require unions or joins, reducing efficiency and increasing risk of errors.

Q133

A company wants to implement a GDPR-compliant analytics pipeline in BigQuery. Customer PII must be automatically detected, masked, or anonymized while still allowing analytics. Which GCP service is most suitable?

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

B) Cloud KMS

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)

D) Cloud Functions

Answer

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is purpose-built to detect, classify, and transform sensitive data such as PII. It integrates with BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub, enabling large-scale analytics while ensuring compliance with GDPR. DLP provides pre-built detectors for common PII types such as names, email addresses, phone numbers, and financial information. Transformations include masking, tokenization, redaction, and format-preserving encryption, allowing analytics on anonymized datasets while protecting sensitive information.

Transformations can be applied inline during ingestion or query execution, reducing operational overhead and ensuring compliance. Audit logs provide traceability, documenting how PII is detected and transformed. Cloud DLP scales to petabyte-level datasets, ensuring automated protection for large-scale analytics pipelines. It reduces operational risk, ensures consistent data protection, and supports regulatory reporting while enabling actionable analytics.

B) Cloud KMS secures encryption keys but does not detect or transform PII, so it cannot ensure GDPR compliance.

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy secures access to applications but does not provide automated detection or anonymization, making it unsuitable for GDPR-compliant analytics pipelines.

D) Cloud Functions can implement custom PII detection and masking but require significant development effort, are less scalable, and lack built-in automation compared to DLP.

Q134

A company wants to monitor BigQuery query costs and trigger near real-time alerts for expensive queries. The solution must be serverless, scalable, and low-maintenance. Which approach is most effective?

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

B) Query BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually

C) Export logs to Cloud Storage and process offline

D) Store query metadata in Bigtable and poll for alerts

Answer

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

Explanation

A) INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables provide metadata about BigQuery jobs, including query execution time, bytes processed, and costs. Cloud Functions can periodically query these tables to identify expensive queries and trigger alerts through Pub/Sub, email, or other channels. This approach is fully serverless, scales automatically, and requires minimal operational effort.

Custom thresholds can monitor specific users, query patterns, or workloads. Using serverless Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub ensures near real-time monitoring, enabling proactive cost management and optimization. It is cost-effective, requires minimal maintenance, and aligns with best practices for monitoring query costs in large-scale BigQuery environments.

B) Querying BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually is not scalable. Cloud SQL cannot efficiently handle large metadata volumes, and manual processes introduce latency, preventing near real-time alerts.

C) Exporting logs to Cloud Storage and processing offline introduces significant delay, making near real-time monitoring impractical.

D) Storing query metadata in Bigtable and polling for alerts increases operational complexity. Polling and orchestration overhead make it less efficient than a serverless Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub solution.

Q135

A company wants to implement a multi-tenant SaaS analytics solution on BigQuery. Each tenant’s data must remain isolated, but occasional cross-tenant queries are required. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design is most suitable?

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant

C) Store data in Cloud SQL and replicate to BigQuery

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant

Answer

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

Explanation

A) A single table with a tenant_id column and clustering by tenant_id is the most effective design for multi-tenant SaaS analytics. Clustering improves performance for queries filtered by tenant and aggregated across tenants. Partitioning by ingestion timestamp further optimizes queries filtered by date. This design scales to petabyte-level datasets without creating multiple tables or projects, reducing operational overhead.

Cross-tenant queries are straightforward, requiring only filtering or grouping by tenant_id. Centralized schema management ensures consistency. BigQuery’s serverless architecture automatically handles scaling, metadata, and query optimization. This approach minimizes cost, maintains high performance, and supports operational dashboards and ad hoc analytics across tenants efficiently. It is ideal for large-scale SaaS environments, providing both isolation and analytical flexibility.

B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant adds operational complexity, including billing management, IAM configuration, and schema evolution. Cross-tenant queries are cumbersome and inefficient.

C) Storing data in Cloud SQL and replicating to BigQuery introduces latency and operational complexity, making it unsuitable for petabyte-scale multi-tenant analytics.

D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant increase operational overhead. Queries across multiple tables require unions or joins, reducing efficiency and maintainability.

Q136

A company wants to build a real-time analytics pipeline for wearable health device data. The system must ingest millions of events per second, guarantee exactly-once processing, perform windowed aggregations, and support low-latency dashboards for monitoring user activity and health metrics. Which architecture is most suitable?

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery

Answer

A) Cloud Pub/Sub → Dataflow → BigQuery

Explanation

A) Cloud Pub/Sub, Dataflow, and BigQuery together form a serverless, fully managed architecture suitable for high-throughput streaming analytics for wearable health devices. Cloud Pub/Sub ingests millions of events per second, including heart rate, step count, sleep patterns, and activity data. Its auto-scaling and durable storage ensure no event loss during bursts of data from peak user activity periods.

Dataflow ensures exactly-once processing through checkpointing, deduplication, and stateful transformations. This guarantees accurate aggregations of metrics such as average heart rate per session, total steps per hour, and anomaly detection in health data. Windowed aggregations allow the computation of metrics over fixed or sliding intervals, enabling near real-time analysis for dashboards. Session-based processing allows tracking user activity over a day, week, or other defined session windows.

BigQuery acts as the analytics layer, storing both raw events and aggregated metrics. Its serverless architecture scales seamlessly to petabyte-level datasets and supports low-latency queries for dashboards, reporting, and historical analysis. BI tools like Looker or Data Studio can integrate with BigQuery for real-time visualization of user activity, health trends, or alerts.

B) Cloud Storage → Dataproc → BigQuery is batch-oriented. Storing events first and processing them in batches introduces latency unsuitable for real-time health monitoring. Dataproc requires manual cluster management, and exactly-once semantics are not guaranteed, which could lead to inaccurate health analytics.

C) Cloud SQL → Cloud Functions → BigQuery cannot scale to millions of events per second. Cloud SQL is designed for transactional workloads, and Cloud Functions have execution and memory limits. Implementing exactly-once processing and windowed aggregations at this scale would require complex orchestration and is prone to errors.

D) Bigtable → Cloud Run → BigQuery can store raw data efficiently but lacks distributed stream processing and exactly-once semantics. Windowed aggregations and low-latency dashboards would require additional orchestration, increasing complexity, latency, and operational risk.

Q137

A company wants to store IoT telemetry data in BigQuery for analytics. Queries frequently filter by timestamp, device type, and region. The dataset is expected to grow to petabytes. Which table design is most suitable for performance and cost efficiency?

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and region

B) Partition by device type and cluster by timestamp

C) Use a single unpartitioned table

D) Create multiple tables per device type and region

Answer

A) Partition by ingestion timestamp and cluster by device type and region

Explanation

A) Partitioning by ingestion timestamp ensures queries filtered by time scan only relevant partitions, reducing the amount of data scanned and lowering costs. Clustering by device type and region physically organizes rows within partitions, optimizing performance for queries filtered by these dimensions. This approach scales efficiently for multi-petabyte datasets and maintains high query performance even as the dataset grows.

A single partitioned and clustered table reduces operational complexity, eliminating the need to manage multiple tables or datasets. Partitioned and clustered tables support both streaming and batch ingestion, enabling real-time anomaly detection, trend analysis, and predictive maintenance. BigQuery automatically manages partition metadata, optimizes query execution, and scales compute and storage seamlessly. This design is particularly effective for IoT telemetry where queries often involve multiple dimensions like device type, region, and timestamp.

B) Partitioning by device type creates many small partitions, which increases metadata overhead and reduces query performance. Clustering by timestamp alone does not optimize common queries filtered by region.

C) A single unpartitioned table is inefficient at petabyte scale. Queries filtered by timestamp, device type, or region would scan the entire table, leading to higher costs and slower performance.

D) Multiple tables per device type and region increase operational complexity. Schema evolution, cross-device queries, and table maintenance become cumbersome. Queries across multiple tables require unions or joins, reducing efficiency and increasing the risk of errors.

Q138

A company wants to implement a GDPR-compliant analytics pipeline in BigQuery. Customer PII must be automatically detected, masked, or anonymized while still allowing analytics. Which GCP service is most suitable?

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

B) Cloud KMS

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy (IAP)

D) Cloud Functions

Answer

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Explanation

A) Cloud Data Loss Prevention (DLP) is purpose-built to detect, classify, and transform sensitive data, such as PII. It integrates with BigQuery, Cloud Storage, and Pub/Sub, allowing secure large-scale analytics. DLP provides pre-built detectors for names, email addresses, phone numbers, social security numbers, financial data, and more. Transformations include masking, tokenization, redaction, and format-preserving encryption, enabling analytics on anonymized datasets without exposing sensitive information.

Transformations can occur inline during ingestion or query execution, minimizing operational overhead and ensuring GDPR compliance. Audit logs track how PII is detected and transformed. Cloud DLP scales to petabyte-level datasets, providing automated protection for large-scale analytics pipelines. This ensures consistent data protection, reduces operational risk, and enables actionable analytics while remaining compliant with regulations.

B) Cloud KMS secures encryption keys but does not detect or transform PII, so it cannot ensure GDPR-compliant analytics.

C) Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy secures access to applications but does not provide automated detection or anonymization, making it unsuitable for GDPR compliance.

D) Cloud Functions can implement custom PII detection and masking but require development effort, are less scalable, and lack built-in automation, making them less reliable than Cloud DLP.

Q139

A company wants to monitor BigQuery query costs and trigger near real-time alerts for expensive queries. The solution must be serverless, scalable, and low-maintenance. Which approach is most effective?

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

B) Query BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually

C) Export logs to Cloud Storage and process offline

D) Store query metadata in Bigtable and poll for alerts

Answer

A) Query INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables with Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub alerts

Explanation

A) INFORMATION_SCHEMA tables contain metadata about BigQuery jobs, including execution time, bytes processed, and costs. Cloud Functions can query these tables periodically to identify expensive queries and trigger alerts via Pub/Sub, email, or other channels. This approach is fully serverless, scales automatically with query volume, and requires minimal operational effort.

Custom thresholds allow monitoring of specific users, queries, or workloads. Using serverless Cloud Functions and Pub/Sub ensures near real-time monitoring and proactive cost management. This architecture is cost-effective, low-maintenance, and follows best practices for monitoring BigQuery query costs at scale.

B) Querying BigQuery from Cloud SQL manually is not scalable. Cloud SQL cannot handle high metadata volumes efficiently, and manual processes introduce latency, preventing near real-time alerts.

C) Exporting logs to Cloud Storage and processing offline introduces delays, making near real-time monitoring impractical.

D) Storing metadata in Bigtable and polling for alerts increases operational complexity. Polling adds overhead, making it less efficient than a serverless Cloud Functions + Pub/Sub solution.

Q140

 A company wants to implement a multi-tenant SaaS analytics solution on BigQuery. Each tenant’s data must remain isolated, but occasional cross-tenant queries are required. The dataset will grow to petabytes. Which table design is most suitable?

A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id
B) Separate BigQuery projects per tenant
C) Store data in Cloud SQL and replicate to BigQuery
D) Multiple unpartitioned tables per tenant

Answer
A) Single table with tenant_id column and clustered by tenant_id

Explanation

A) Single table with a tenant_id column and clustering by tenant_id provides the most scalable, cost-effective, and operationally efficient design for multi-tenant SaaS analytics in BigQuery. This approach leverages BigQuery’s underlying columnar storage and serverless architecture to handle petabyte-scale datasets efficiently while maintaining tenant isolation and supporting both tenant-specific and cross-tenant analytics.

Scalability: A single table design scales naturally to petabytes of data. BigQuery is optimized for large, single-table operations with high query performance, leveraging its distributed architecture. By storing all tenants’ data in a single table, the platform avoids metadata overhead and administrative complexity that arises when managing multiple tables or projects. The single-table approach allows seamless horizontal scaling without requiring changes in schema or query patterns as the dataset grows.

Tenant Isolation and Security: Each row in the table contains a tenant_id column, which enables logical separation of tenant data while keeping it physically co-located. Access controls can be enforced using row-level security policies or views, ensuring that each tenant only sees their own data. This allows strict data isolation without incurring the operational complexity of provisioning separate datasets or projects for each tenant.

Query Performance: Clustering the table by tenant_id optimizes query performance for tenant-specific filtering. When queries include a WHERE tenant_id = X condition, BigQuery reads only the relevant clusters instead of scanning the entire table. This dramatically reduces the amount of data processed, lowering both query cost and latency. Clustering works well with other filters, such as time-based columns, enabling highly efficient analytical queries over large datasets. Additionally, partitioning the table by ingestion timestamp or event time further optimizes time-range queries, which are common in analytics workloads. This dual approach—partitioning by time and clustering by tenant—provides a balance between cost efficiency and query performance.

Cross-Tenant Analytics: While tenant isolation is maintained, the single-table design also allows easy cross-tenant aggregation or comparison queries. Analysts can simply use GROUP BY tenant_id or similar operations to analyze data across all tenants. This capability is crucial for product analytics, benchmarking, and internal reporting, which require aggregated views without compromising security. In contrast, designs that spread tenant data across multiple tables or projects make cross-tenant queries more cumbersome and expensive.

Operational Efficiency: Managing one table is operationally simpler than managing multiple tables or projects. Schema evolution, data ingestion pipelines, and monitoring are easier to maintain because there is a single schema definition and a single set of pipelines. Changes such as adding a new column, modifying data types, or updating partitions can be applied once, instead of being replicated across multiple tables or projects. This reduces the likelihood of inconsistencies and operational errors.

Cost Management: BigQuery’s pricing is primarily based on data scanned. Clustering by tenant_id ensures that tenant-specific queries scan only relevant portions of the data, minimizing cost. Partitioning by time further reduces unnecessary scanning, especially for queries limited to recent data. Centralized table storage also avoids duplication of storage and metadata costs that arise when multiple tables or projects are used for each tenant.

Integration with Analytics Tools: A single, centralized table simplifies integration with BI tools like Looker, Data Studio, or Tableau. Dashboards can be created with filters for tenant_id, allowing tenants to self-serve analytics while also supporting organization-wide reporting. This design ensures consistent metrics, reduces ETL complexity, and provides a unified data model across the organization.

BigQuery Serverless Benefits: BigQuery is a fully managed, serverless data warehouse, which abstracts the complexities of infrastructure management, scaling, and query optimization. Using a single table leverages these benefits fully. The platform automatically handles data distribution, parallelization, and caching. Administrators do not need to worry about provisioning capacity, sharding tables, or managing clusters, which can be challenging in multi-tenant scenarios at petabyte scale.

The single-table design with a tenant_id column, clustered by tenant, and optionally partitioned by ingestion timestamp, is the most suitable solution for multi-tenant SaaS analytics on BigQuery. It balances tenant isolation, query performance, cost efficiency, operational simplicity, and scalability. This design supports petabyte-scale datasets, simplifies cross-tenant analytics, minimizes management overhead, and leverages BigQuery’s serverless architecture to its fullest potential.