- Home
- Isaca CRISC Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q81-100
Isaca CRISC Certified in Risk and Information Systems Control Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 5 Q81-100
Visit here for our full Isaca CRISC exam dumps and practice test questions.
Question 81:
Which is the most important factor to consider when evaluating control effectiveness for outsourced IT services?
A) Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and contractual obligations
B) Physical location of the vendor
C) Number of employees in the vendor organization
D) Vendor marketing materials
Answer: B) Service Level Agreements (SLAs) and contractual obligations
Explanation:
Service Level Agreements and contractual obligations form the foundation for evaluating the effectiveness of outsourced IT controls. These agreements define the responsibilities, performance expectations, and accountability of the vendor in measurable and enforceable terms. By reviewing SLAs, risk professionals can assess whether the provider is meeting agreed-upon standards for security, data handling, availability, and other critical operational areas. They also provide a legal basis for recourse if service deficiencies occur. Without SLAs, it becomes challenging to objectively evaluate control performance because there is no clear benchmark or formal expectation against which the vendor’s performance can be measured.
Considering the physical location of the vendor is sometimes relevant, particularly when there are regulatory, compliance, or data residency requirements. For example, certain jurisdictions may mandate that sensitive data be stored within the country, or that specific legal protections apply. However, location alone does not ensure that controls are effective. A vendor in a compliant region may still fail to meet operational or security standards if contractual expectations are weak or unenforced. Therefore, while location can influence risk considerations, it cannot substitute for enforceable performance metrics.
The number of employees in a vendor organization is largely an administrative or superficial factor. While organizational size might imply the potential for scalability or redundancy, it does not inherently reflect control effectiveness. A smaller vendor may implement robust, well-documented processes and achieve high reliability, while a large vendor with thousands of employees may still exhibit weak control execution if processes are fragmented or poorly monitored. Evaluating effectiveness based solely on employee count is insufficient and potentially misleading.
Relying on vendor marketing materials is the least reliable approach. Promotional content is inherently subjective and designed to present the vendor in the most favorable light. It does not provide evidence of actual performance, adherence to policies, or control reliability. Marketing claims cannot be independently verified and may overstate capabilities. When evaluating control effectiveness, evidence-based assessments tied to contractual obligations and measurable performance outcomes are essential. Therefore, prioritizing SLAs and contractual terms ensures that risk assessment is grounded in enforceable, auditable, and objective criteria, supporting effective management of third-party risk.
Question 82:
Which is the most appropriate action when a residual risk exceeds the organization’s risk appetite?
A) Implement additional controls or mitigation strategies
B) Ignore the residual risk
C) Document the risk and leave it unaddressed
D) Transfer the risk without evaluating cost-benefit
Answer: A) Implement additional controls or mitigation strategies
Explanation:
Implementing additional controls or mitigation strategies is the most appropriate response when residual risk exceeds the organization’s risk appetite because it ensures that risk exposure is reduced to acceptable levels. Residual risk represents the portion of risk remaining after existing controls have been applied, and if this level surpasses the organization’s defined tolerance, it indicates that current measures are inadequate. Additional mitigation could involve technical controls, policy changes, process redesign, or enhanced monitoring. Proactively addressing residual risks aligns with governance expectations, supports regulatory compliance, and protects operational, financial, and reputational interests.
Ignoring the residual risk is an inappropriate approach because it leaves the organization exposed to potential adverse events. Risks that are beyond the appetite threshold can have cascading effects, impacting critical processes and creating financial or reputational damage. Even if the probability is low, the potential impact could be significant. Choosing to ignore a risk contradicts the principles of sound risk management, as it fails to proactively manage threats that could compromise strategic objectives.
Documenting the risk but leaving it unaddressed is also insufficient. While proper documentation is an important component of risk governance and ensures accountability, it does not reduce actual exposure. Simply recording a high-risk condition without implementing corrective measures provides little assurance to management or stakeholders that the risk is being managed. This approach can create a false sense of security, where risks appear to be monitored but remain unchecked.
Transferring the risk without evaluating the cost-benefit is an incomplete strategy. Risk transfer, such as purchasing insurance or contracting third-party coverage, can be effective but often involves financial trade-offs. Without careful evaluation, transfer may result in excessive costs or incomplete coverage, leaving residual gaps. Therefore, the preferred action is to implement additional mitigation strategies to actively reduce the risk to acceptable levels, ensuring that organizational exposure remains within the defined appetite while maintaining an efficient and cost-effective risk management framework.
Question 83:
Which step should be taken first when conducting enterprise risk assessments?
A) Identify and categorize organizational objectives
B) Conduct control testing
C) Review prior incidents only
D) Implement mitigation plans
Answer: A) Identify and categorize organizational objectives
Explanation:
The first step in any enterprise risk assessment is to identify and categorize organizational objectives because risk is inherently defined in relation to goals. Without a clear understanding of objectives, it is impossible to determine which events or conditions would threaten the achievement of those goals. Objectives provide the context for identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing risks. Categorization of objectives, such as strategic, operational, financial, or compliance-related, helps risk professionals align assessment efforts with organizational priorities and ensures that resources are focused on areas with the highest potential impact.
Conducting control testing is an important part of risk assessment but is premature before objectives are defined. Control effectiveness is assessed relative to the risks associated with organizational goals. Testing controls without understanding objectives may result in unnecessary effort or focus on low-priority areas. Control testing is more meaningful when there is a clear mapping of risks to objectives, allowing evaluators to measure whether controls adequately mitigate threats that could impede goal achievement.
Reviewing prior incidents provides historical insight into risk events but is insufficient as the first step. Past incidents can inform risk likelihood and severity, but without connecting these events to current objectives, the relevance of lessons learned may be limited. Focusing exclusively on historical data risks overlooking emerging or strategic risks that have not yet materialized, and it does not establish the foundational context required for a comprehensive risk assessment.
Implementing mitigation plans occurs after risks have been identified, analyzed, and prioritized. Mitigation strategies are designed to reduce exposure to critical risks and should be directly tied to objectives. Taking action before understanding objectives and associated risks may lead to misallocation of resources or implementation of controls that do not effectively address the most significant threats. Therefore, identifying and categorizing organizational objectives first provides a structured foundation, ensuring that all subsequent risk assessment activities are relevant, prioritized, and aligned with the organization’s strategic and operational goals.
Question 84:
Which technique best supports the identification of interdependencies between operational risks?
A) Process mapping and workflow analysis
B) Reviewing annual financial statements
C) Conducting employee satisfaction surveys
D) Performing ad-hoc interviews only
Answer: A) Process mapping and workflow analysis
Explanation:
Process mapping and workflow analysis are highly effective techniques for identifying interdependencies between operational risks because they visually and systematically represent how activities, tasks, and resources interact across the organization. By mapping processes, risk practitioners can trace inputs, outputs, and points of interaction between systems and departments, making it easier to identify potential cascading effects if a risk event occurs. This structured approach allows identification of critical dependencies, redundancies, and bottlenecks, which is essential for understanding how a failure in one area could impact other areas, enabling proactive risk management and mitigation.
Reviewing annual financial statements provides insight into financial health and potential exposure to financial risks but offers very limited understanding of operational interdependencies. While financial data can indicate trends or anomalies, it does not reveal the workflow, resource dependencies, or interaction points between operational processes. Therefore, this method cannot effectively identify how risks propagate across operational units or processes.
Conducting employee satisfaction surveys can be useful for capturing perceptions of workplace culture, engagement, and morale. While this information may highlight potential risks related to human behavior, such as low adherence to processes or increased error rates, it is largely subjective and qualitative. Surveys alone do not provide a structured view of how processes are interconnected or how operational risks interact across systems and functions, making them insufficient for comprehensive interdependency analysis.
Performing ad-hoc interviews only provides anecdotal insights and may uncover specific concerns or experiences but lacks a systematic and replicable framework. Interviews are valuable as a supplement to structured mapping but cannot replace the visual and analytical rigor required to understand complex operational interdependencies. Process mapping remains the most effective method because it produces a clear, documented representation of workflows, interconnections, and potential risk propagation points, allowing risk managers to prioritize interventions and strengthen control placement strategically.
Question 85:
Which is the most appropriate approach for evaluating the effectiveness of risk controls in a high-risk process?
A) Conducting independent testing and validating control outcomes
B) Relying solely on management self-assessment
C) Reviewing prior incident reports only
D) Monitoring user satisfaction with process performance
Answer: A) Conducting independent testing and validating control outcomes
Explanation:
Conducting independent testing and validation is the most appropriate approach for evaluating control effectiveness in a high-risk process because it provides an objective assessment free from internal bias. Independent testing confirms whether controls are operating as designed and whether they achieve their intended risk mitigation outcomes. Validation often involves reviewing evidence, performing walkthroughs, and conducting sample testing to verify actual performance. This approach ensures that control effectiveness is not assumed but is measured against defined criteria, providing credibility and assurance to management, auditors, and stakeholders.
Relying solely on management self-assessment is insufficient because self-assessments are inherently subjective. While management has valuable operational insight, assessments can be influenced by personal biases, lack of critical perspective, or incomplete knowledge of control failures. This approach risks overestimating control effectiveness, particularly in high-risk areas where the consequences of failure are significant.
Reviewing prior incident reports provides historical context and lessons learned but is backward-looking. Past incidents highlight where controls may have failed, yet they do not confirm that current controls are effective or that risks are being actively managed. Incident reviews alone cannot provide assurance of ongoing compliance or operational reliability, especially in dynamic or complex environments.
Monitoring user satisfaction with process performance captures perception and experience but does not objectively measure control effectiveness. Users may not be aware of failures or control deficiencies that do not immediately impact their experience, making this an unreliable indicator of control performance. Independent testing remains the preferred method because it objectively evaluates control design and execution, ensures accountability, and provides actionable insights for continuous improvement, particularly in high-risk processes where the cost of failure is significant.
Question 86:
Which step should be performed first when a significant new risk is identified during project execution?
A) Assess the risk’s potential impact on project objectives
B) Implement immediate mitigation measures without analysis
C) Notify the board without assessing relevance
D) Conduct post-project review
Answer: A) Assess the risk’s potential impact on project objectives
Explanation:
Assessing the risk’s potential impact on project objectives is the most crucial first step because it establishes the basis for all subsequent risk management decisions. When a new risk arises, understanding its potential consequences on the project’s scope, schedule, cost, and quality allows project managers and stakeholders to evaluate its urgency and prioritize resources appropriately. This step ensures that responses are proportionate to the actual threat rather than reactive or arbitrary, which helps prevent unnecessary disruption or over-allocation of resources. It also enables alignment with project governance structures and ensures that risk responses are justified and transparent.
Implementing mitigation measures without first analyzing the risk may appear proactive but is generally counterproductive. Immediate action without assessment can result in resources being deployed toward risks that may have limited impact, leading to inefficiency and potentially introducing additional problems. In some cases, the chosen mitigation could even create new risks or conflict with existing project objectives. Therefore, while mitigation is essential, its timing and design must follow a careful evaluation to ensure it is appropriate and cost-effective.
Notifying the board or senior management without an initial assessment is premature. Leadership relies on contextually relevant information to make informed decisions. Reporting unassessed risks may create unnecessary alarm or mislead decision-makers regarding priorities. While escalation is important for significant risks, the report should be supported by data that clearly defines potential impact, likelihood, and affected objectives, allowing the board to provide guidance or approval for the response strategy.
Conducting a post-project review is unrelated to the immediate identification and management of a risk. Post-project reviews are retrospective exercises designed to capture lessons learned, identify control gaps, and improve future projects. Waiting until project closure to assess or respond to a significant risk would defeat the purpose of proactive risk management. Assessing impact immediately ensures that the organization can respond effectively during execution rather than retrospectively. The correct answer emphasizes the first step as impact assessment because it provides a structured, informed, and proportionate foundation for decision-making, resource allocation, and mitigation planning.
Question 87:
Which is the most important factor when prioritizing IT risks for remediation?
A) Likelihood and potential impact on critical business processes
B) Ease of implementing fixes
C) Cost of remediation only
D) Number of tickets reported by users
Answer: A) Likelihood and potential impact on critical business processes
Explanation:
Prioritizing IT risks requires focusing on factors that could have the most significant consequences for the organization. Likelihood and potential impact directly measure the probability of a risk occurring and the extent to which it could affect critical business processes, making this the cornerstone of prioritization. High-likelihood, high-impact risks demand immediate attention because they can disrupt operations, cause financial loss, damage reputation, or compromise regulatory compliance. Evaluating risks against business-critical processes ensures that mitigation resources are allocated to where they will have the greatest effect in protecting organizational objectives.
Considering ease of implementing fixes is operationally convenient but should not drive prioritization. Some low-effort solutions may address minor issues while leaving major risks unmitigated, which is inefficient and misaligned with enterprise risk priorities. While ease of remediation can inform scheduling or implementation planning, it is secondary to the assessment of potential harm.
Focusing solely on the cost of remediation is insufficient because it ignores the severity and likelihood of the risk. A high-cost mitigation may be necessary for a risk with significant potential impact, and prioritizing based on cost alone could leave the organization exposed to critical threats. Cost considerations should inform how the remediation is executed, not whether it is prioritized.
Counting user-reported tickets reflects frequency rather than severity or business impact. A high volume of minor issues may not threaten critical processes, while a single, severe risk may have catastrophic consequences. Effective prioritization requires a strategic view based on likelihood and potential impact rather than operational noise. Therefore, the correct approach is to evaluate both the probability of occurrence and potential effects on critical business processes to ensure that remediation efforts safeguard key organizational objectives efficiently and effectively.
Question 88:
Which activity best ensures timely identification of emerging operational risks?
A) Monitoring external trends, regulations, and industry threats
B) Reviewing only historical incident reports
C) Conducting annual employee surveys
D) Evaluating legacy control documentation exclusively
Answer: A) Monitoring external trends, regulations, and industry threats
Explanation:
Monitoring external trends is the most effective approach to identifying emerging operational risks because risks often arise from external changes rather than internal processes alone. This includes shifts in regulatory requirements, technological innovation, market dynamics, competitive pressures, and geopolitical events. By continuously observing these external factors, organizations can anticipate potential threats and adapt their risk management strategies proactively, rather than reacting after an incident occurs. This approach enables timely mitigation and informed decision-making to maintain operational resilience and business continuity.
Relying solely on historical incident reports is inherently reactive. While analyzing past events provides valuable lessons and insight into vulnerabilities, it cannot reliably predict new or evolving threats. Emerging risks may be driven by factors that did not exist in the past, so an organization must extend its risk horizon beyond historical data to remain proactive.
Conducting annual employee surveys provides a snapshot of risk perceptions and awareness but is limited by frequency and subjectivity. Surveys may miss emerging threats if they are not aligned with changing external conditions and do not capture real-time developments. Relying exclusively on this approach risks delayed recognition of critical operational risks.
Evaluating legacy control documentation is necessary for compliance and control assessment but insufficient for detecting new operational risks. Controls that were effective historically may not address novel threats or technological changes. Therefore, while useful as part of a broader risk management framework, legacy documentation alone cannot ensure timely identification. Monitoring external trends allows organizations to adopt a proactive, anticipatory approach to risk management and ensures that resources are directed toward preventing emerging threats before they materialize.
Question 89:
Which step should be performed first when a company plans to implement enterprise risk management?
A) Identify key stakeholders and define their risk responsibilities
B) Develop reporting dashboards
C) Conduct post-implementation audits
D) Train all staff on risk policies
Answer: A) Identify key stakeholders and define their risk responsibilities
Explanation:
Identifying key stakeholders and defining their responsibilities is the first step because governance is foundational to enterprise risk management (ERM). Assigning clear roles ensures accountability, ownership, and proper escalation of risks. Stakeholders serve as the primary drivers for risk identification, assessment, mitigation, and monitoring. Without clarity on responsibilities, ERM initiatives risk inconsistency, duplication of efforts, or misalignment with organizational objectives. Early engagement of stakeholders also facilitates buy-in, improves communication, and enables the creation of structured reporting channels.
Developing reporting dashboards is important for risk visibility and decision support but must follow stakeholder identification. Dashboards are only effective if they provide relevant metrics and insights to the appropriate decision-makers. Without knowing who the stakeholders are and what information they require, dashboards may fail to serve their intended purpose, wasting time and resources.
Conducting post-implementation audits is a later stage activity aimed at evaluating ERM effectiveness. Audits are designed to measure compliance, identify gaps, and recommend improvements, but they cannot substitute for foundational planning and governance. Performing audits before stakeholder identification would be premature and ineffective.
Training staff on risk policies is essential for fostering a risk-aware culture, but this step should follow stakeholder engagement. Training is most effective when responsibilities, processes, and reporting lines are clearly defined. Without this context, employees may not fully understand their roles or how to act on the policies. Identifying stakeholders first establishes the foundation upon which dashboards, audits, and training can be meaningfully built, ensuring a structured and sustainable ERM implementation.
Question 90:
Which is the most effective way to maintain a risk-aware culture in an organization?
A) Conduct targeted training and awareness programs for employees
B) Issue risk management policies without training
C) Rely solely on automated risk monitoring tools
D) Conduct risk assessments annually only
Answer: A) Conduct targeted training and awareness programs for employees
Explanation:
Targeted training and awareness programs are the most effective method to maintain a risk-aware culture because culture is primarily shaped by knowledge, behavior, and engagement. Training equips employees with the understanding of potential risks, control mechanisms, and reporting procedures. Awareness programs reinforce the importance of proactive risk identification and encourage behaviors that align with organizational risk management objectives. By engaging employees directly, organizations foster a shared sense of responsibility and accountability, which strengthens the overall risk culture.
Issuing policies without training provides guidelines but does not ensure comprehension or behavior change. Employees may not interpret policies correctly or may overlook critical responsibilities without contextual understanding. Policies alone cannot instill the proactive mindset required to recognize and respond to risks effectively.
Relying solely on automated tools is insufficient because technology cannot replace human judgment. Automated monitoring can detect anomalies or generate alerts, but human interpretation, escalation, and decision-making are necessary to respond to risks effectively. Without employee engagement, tools may identify risks without facilitating appropriate action or fostering a culture of accountability.
Conducting annual risk assessments provides insight into organizational vulnerabilities but is limited in scope and frequency. While important for strategic planning, infrequent assessments do not cultivate continuous awareness or proactive behavior. Sustaining a risk-aware culture requires ongoing education and reinforcement, which is achieved through targeted training and engagement initiatives. Therefore, structured and continuous employee training is the most effective approach for building and maintaining an enduring risk-aware organizational culture.
Question 91:
Which approach is most effective for integrating risk management into project management processes?
A) Embedding risk identification, assessment, and mitigation steps into project lifecycle phases
B) Performing risk reviews only at project closure
C) Reporting project risks to senior management without tracking
D) Relying on team intuition to manage risks
Answer: A) Embedding risk identification, assessment, and mitigation steps into project lifecycle phases
Explanation:
Embedding risk management into all phases of a project lifecycle is critical for proactive and structured oversight. This approach ensures that risks are not only identified early but also assessed and addressed continuously throughout the project. By integrating risk activities into planning, execution, and monitoring stages, organizations can allocate resources effectively, prioritize high-impact risks, and prevent minor issues from escalating into major disruptions. This method aligns with governance practices and helps ensure projects meet their objectives in terms of scope, schedule, and cost.
Performing risk reviews solely at project closure is reactive and provides no benefit to ongoing project decision-making. By waiting until the project ends, organizations miss the opportunity to prevent or mitigate risks during execution. This approach can result in unanticipated delays, cost overruns, or compromised project quality, as potential threats are only recognized after they have already impacted project outcomes. Although post-project reviews provide learning opportunities, they cannot prevent risk events from occurring in real time.
Reporting project risks to senior management without tracking introduces visibility but lacks accountability. While leadership awareness is valuable, it does not guarantee that risks are managed or mitigated. Without follow-up mechanisms, tracking, and response actions, acknowledged risks remain uncontrolled. This method may lead to incomplete documentation and a false sense of security, leaving the project exposed to threats that could have been addressed through active management.
Relying on team intuition is inconsistent and subjective. Experienced teams may offer valuable insights, but intuition does not replace formal risk identification, assessment, and mitigation processes. Informal approaches are prone to oversight, particularly for complex or emerging risks that may not be obvious. Structured risk management processes ensure that all potential risks are systematically evaluated and addressed, reducing variability and improving the likelihood of project success. Embedding risk management into project lifecycle phases remains the most effective approach because it allows for proactive, consistent, and comprehensive control of project risks.
Question 92:
Which activity should be performed first when evaluating third-party risk?
A) Identify critical services and regulatory obligations associated with the vendor
B) Conduct on-site inspections
C) Review vendor marketing and promotional material
D) Evaluate vendor financial statements exclusively
Answer: A) Identify critical services and regulatory obligations associated with the vendor
Explanation:
Identifying critical services and regulatory obligations first is essential because it defines the scope and context for the risk assessment. Understanding which services impact operations and compliance ensures that risk evaluation is focused and relevant. It also informs priorities for control assessment, monitoring, and contractual agreements.
Conducting on-site inspections is valuable but resource-intensive. Performing inspections without understanding criticality and compliance requirements may result in inefficient use of time and resources.
Reviewing marketing materials provides limited value and is inherently biased. Promotional content does not reliably indicate risk exposure or control effectiveness.
Evaluating financial statements alone assesses financial stability but does not address operational, regulatory, or compliance risks. A financially sound vendor may still introduce significant operational risks.
The correct answer emphasizes identification of critical services and obligations because this foundational step guides subsequent assessment, ensures alignment with organizational priorities, and facilitates proactive third-party risk management.
Question 93:
Which is the most important factor when determining residual risk after implementing controls?
A) Organizational risk appetite and tolerance levels
B) Number of controls implemented
C) Cost of mitigation activities
D) Ease of monitoring controls
Answer: A) Organizational risk appetite and tolerance levels
Explanation:
Residual risk is defined relative to what an organization is willing to accept. Assessing residual risk against risk appetite and tolerance ensures that remaining exposure is acceptable and that additional mitigation or acceptance decisions are aligned with governance objectives. It is a critical step for accountability and informed decision-making.
The number of controls implemented may indicate effort but does not measure actual risk reduction or residual exposure. Multiple controls can be redundant or ineffective if improperly designed.
Cost of mitigation is important for budgeting, but it should not drive risk assessment. High-cost mitigation may be justified if residual risk exceeds tolerance.
Ease of monitoring may support operational feasibility but does not determine whether residual risk is acceptable. Easy-to-monitor controls may still leave significant exposure.
The correct answer emphasizes alignment with risk appetite because it ensures residual risks are managed within governance expectations, supporting informed decisions and organizational resilience.
Question 94:
Which technique is most effective for identifying risk interdependencies across business processes?
A) Process mapping and workflow analysis
B) Reviewing prior incident reports exclusively
C) Conducting ad-hoc employee interviews
D) Evaluating system logs only
Answer: A) Process mapping and workflow analysis
Explanation:
Process mapping and workflow analysis provide a structured approach to visualizing and understanding the interactions and dependencies across business processes. By documenting the flow of activities, resources, and decision points, organizations can identify points where a risk event in one process may affect others. This comprehensive view is critical for recognizing cascading impacts, prioritizing mitigation efforts, and designing controls that address systemic vulnerabilities rather than isolated issues.
Relying solely on prior incident reports is backward-looking. While historical data provides insight into past failures and lessons learned, it does not reliably capture complex process interdependencies or emerging risks. Solely depending on this method may lead to overlooked vulnerabilities in areas that have not yet experienced incidents.
Ad-hoc employee interviews provide anecdotal information, which can be inconsistent and incomplete. While employees may highlight certain risk interactions, this method is not systematic and may fail to capture full operational interdependencies. The quality of information heavily depends on the knowledge and perspective of individual interviewees.
Evaluating system logs focuses primarily on technical dependencies and operational events within IT systems. While useful for detecting anomalies or patterns, logs often fail to reveal cross-functional or process-level risk interconnections. System-level insights do not provide the holistic understanding required for managing enterprise-wide risk interdependencies. Process mapping remains the most effective technique as it provides a complete, structured, and proactive means to understand complex relationships and potential cascading risks.
Question 95:
Which factor is most critical when assigning risk ownership for a newly identified operational risk?
A) The business unit accountable for achieving the related objectives
B) The team with technical expertise
C) The department controlling the budget
D) The individual reporting to senior management
Answer: A) The business unit accountable for achieving the related objectives
Explanation:
Risk ownership should align with operational accountability. Assigning ownership to the business unit responsible for achieving the objectives tied to the risk ensures that those with authority, influence, and responsibility for outcomes manage the risk. This alignment enables proper monitoring, implementation of mitigation strategies, and escalation if thresholds are exceeded. Ownership by the accountable unit ensures integration of risk management into day-to-day decision-making.
Technical expertise is valuable for designing and implementing controls but does not replace accountability. While technical teams can advise and support mitigation, they lack the decision-making authority over objectives, making them inappropriate as primary risk owners.
Budget control alone is insufficient for risk ownership. Departments managing finances can allocate resources for mitigation, but without operational authority, they cannot ensure effective risk management or enforce necessary actions. Financial oversight is complementary but not a substitute for accountability.
Assigning ownership to individuals reporting to senior management ensures visibility but not necessarily responsibility. Communication channels alone do not confer operational control or decision-making authority required to manage risk effectively. The accountable business unit is best positioned to act, coordinate, and take responsibility for outcomes, ensuring risk management is both actionable and integrated into organizational governance.
Question 96:
Which is the first action a risk practitioner should take when a significant regulatory change is announced?
A) Assess potential impacts on business operations and compliance requirements
B) Immediately update policies and procedures
C) Notify the board of directors
D) Train staff on compliance requirements
Answer: A) Assess potential impacts on business operations and compliance requirements
Explanation:
Option A, assessing potential impacts on business operations and compliance requirements, is the most critical first step because it establishes a comprehensive understanding of how the regulatory change affects the organization. This analysis identifies areas of potential non-compliance, operational disruption, or control gaps. By understanding the full scope of impact, the organization can prioritize subsequent actions such as policy updates, staff training, and board reporting. This structured approach ensures that any response is grounded in a clear picture of risk exposure rather than reactive measures.
Option B, immediately updating policies and procedures, may seem proactive, but doing so without a proper assessment can lead to incomplete or incorrect documentation. Policies must accurately reflect the business processes and compliance requirements, and rushing updates can result in misalignment or regulatory violations. This approach could also waste resources on changes that may later need correction after a full impact assessment is conducted.
Option C, notifying the board of directors, is important for governance and strategic oversight but should occur after the potential impacts are analyzed. Premature reporting without context or understanding may lead to unnecessary concern or misinformed decisions. The board benefits most from informed recommendations that prioritize critical areas and provide actionable guidance, which can only come after the initial assessment.
Option D, training staff on compliance requirements, is an essential step for implementation, but it is ineffective if done before understanding what changes are necessary. Training requires precise and relevant content aligned with updated procedures and controls. Conducting training without first assessing the impacts risks educating employees on processes that may not reflect actual compliance needs, creating confusion or operational errors. The correct sequence emphasizes analysis first, then structured communication, updates, and training to ensure all actions are informed, prioritized, and effective.
Question 97:
Which approach best ensures continuous monitoring of enterprise risks?
A) Implement automated key risk indicators (KRIs) with defined thresholds
B) Conduct quarterly risk workshops only
C) Review annual audit reports exclusively
D) Update risk registers annually without automation
Answer: A) Implement automated key risk indicators (KRIs) with defined thresholds
Explanation:
Option A focuses on automated key risk indicators with defined thresholds, which allow for real-time monitoring and early detection of deviations from expected risk levels. Automated KRIs provide consistent, data-driven insights, enabling timely responses and proactive mitigation. Continuous monitoring ensures that risks are identified as they evolve rather than after they have already impacted operations. Automation supports scalability and ensures that monitoring covers multiple risk areas without dependence on manual processes.
Option B, conducting quarterly risk workshops, is valuable for awareness and discussion but is inherently periodic. While workshops can identify trends or emerging risks, they do not provide continuous oversight, which is necessary for timely response to rapidly changing conditions. Risk information between workshops may go unmonitored, leaving the organization vulnerable to unexpected developments.
Option C, reviewing annual audit reports exclusively, is retrospective in nature. Audit reports summarize past performance and control effectiveness but cannot provide timely alerts for emerging risks. Reliance on annual reports alone risks delayed detection of issues and insufficiently proactive risk management.
Option D, updating risk registers annually without automation, is similarly limited by its frequency. Annual updates cannot reflect dynamic changes in risk exposure, and manual processes may introduce errors or delays. Continuous monitoring requires tools and processes that track risk in real time, not periodic snapshots. The correct choice emphasizes automated KRIs because they combine real-time insight, defined thresholds, and proactive alerts, creating a robust mechanism for managing risk continuously across the enterprise.
Question 98:
Which activity is most important to ensure that risk responses remain effective over time?
A) Continuous monitoring and periodic review of controls
B) One-time implementation of controls only
C) Annual audit without ongoing monitoring
D) Ad-hoc assessments triggered by incidents
Answer: A) Continuous monitoring and periodic review of controls
Explanation:
Option A highlights continuous monitoring and periodic review of controls, which is critical for maintaining their effectiveness over time. Risks are not static; they evolve with changes in technology, regulations, business processes, and the external threat landscape. Continuous monitoring allows organizations to detect deviations, failures, or emerging threats promptly, ensuring controls remain relevant. Periodic reviews allow for adjustments, updates, and enhancements to maintain alignment with objectives and evolving risk profiles.
Option B, a one-time implementation of controls, fails to address changes in operational context or emerging threats. Without ongoing assessment, even well-designed controls may become inadequate, outdated, or misaligned with business needs.
Option C, relying solely on annual audits, provides only a periodic snapshot of control effectiveness. While audits offer important insights, they are retrospective and cannot detect risks that arise between audit cycles. They are insufficient as a standalone approach for maintaining dynamic risk response effectiveness.
Option D, ad-hoc assessments triggered by incidents, are reactive and focus on problems after they occur. This method misses proactive identification and management of risks before they materialize, leading to potential gaps in risk coverage. The correct answer emphasizes continuous monitoring and periodic review because these activities create a feedback loop that keeps controls aligned with business priorities, emerging risks, and compliance requirements, ensuring sustainable effectiveness over time.
Question 99:
Which factor is most important when performing risk assessment on legacy systems?
A) System dependency and integration with critical business processes
B) Age of hardware and software alone
C) Vendor support contract length
D) User satisfaction with system performance
Answer: A) System dependency and integration with critical business processes
Explanation:
Option A emphasizes the importance of system dependency and integration with critical processes. Legacy systems that support essential operations pose higher risk if they fail, so understanding interconnections and dependencies ensures the risk assessment focuses on areas that could have significant operational impact. This approach prioritizes mitigating risks with the most substantial business consequences, rather than superficial characteristics.
Option B, considering age alone, provides limited insight. Older hardware or software may require maintenance, but age does not inherently determine risk exposure. A system can be outdated yet still function effectively if it supports critical processes reliably.
Option C, vendor support contract length, is relevant for maintenance and technical assistance but does not address the operational significance of the system. Even with active vendor support, a system that fails could disrupt critical operations.
Option D, user satisfaction, is subjective and does not reflect the system’s operational risk or its role in critical business processes. Users may perceive performance as satisfactory while underlying vulnerabilities remain unaddressed. The correct choice prioritizes system dependency because it directs attention to legacy systems that, if compromised, would most affect business continuity, making the risk assessment more meaningful and actionable.
Question 100:
Which activity is most important for maintaining an up-to-date enterprise risk register?
A) Periodically reviewing and validating entries with process owners
B) Archiving historical risks only
C) Updating entries solely based on audit recommendations
D) Maintaining a static template without updates
Answer: A) Periodically reviewing and validating entries with process owners
Explanation:
Option A, periodic review and validation with process owners, ensures the risk register remains accurate, relevant, and reflective of current operations. Process owners provide direct insight into emerging risks, control effectiveness, and changes in business processes. This engagement ensures that entries are comprehensive, actionable, and up-to-date, supporting enterprise-wide risk awareness and decision-making.
Option B, archiving historical risks only, serves record-keeping purposes but does not maintain the currency of active risk information. A risk register must capture evolving risks, not only store past ones.
Option C, updating entries solely based on audit recommendations, provides limited coverage. Audits may identify gaps or issues but may not capture operational, strategic, or emerging risks in real time. Relying exclusively on audits risks overlooking important factors.
Option D, maintaining a static template without updates, prevents adaptability and hinders the organization from reflecting changes in the risk environment. Without regular review and validation, the risk register becomes outdated and loses its value as a tool for informed decision-making. The correct answer emphasizes review and validation because it ensures the risk register is a living, dynamic document that supports timely, effective enterprise risk management and governance.
Popular posts
Recent Posts
- Amazon AWS Certified Security – Specialty SCS-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 10 Q181-200
- Amazon AWS Certified Security – Specialty SCS-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q161-180
- Amazon AWS Certified Security – Specialty SCS-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q141-160
- Amazon AWS Certified Security – Specialty SCS-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q121-140
- Amazon AWS Certified Security – Specialty SCS-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q101-120
