Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q141-160

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 141:

Your organization wants all outbound traffic from multiple VNets to be inspected through centralized NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke design centralizes outbound traffic inspection in hub NVAs while maintaining isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates when network changes occur. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, threat monitoring, logging, and compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and management effort while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce centralized security policies. High availability is ensured using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, enabling operational efficiency and scalability.

Question 142:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. This removes manual configuration, reduces operational errors, and supports hybrid environments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, requires frequent manual updates, and does not scale for dynamic, multi-region deployments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Using Route Server ensures routing consistency, reduces operational overhead, and supports scalable deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures, while dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs and maintains network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 143:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection through hub NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs inspect traffic for compliance, security, and operational monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and compliance purposes. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and costs while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 144:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs

B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale for dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 145:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 146:

Your organization wants all outbound traffic from multiple VNets to be inspected through centralized NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke topology is the recommended architecture for centralized inspection while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs deployed in the hub serve as inspection points for all outbound traffic. Azure Route Server enables dynamic route propagation via BGP, allowing NVAs to learn routes from Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual UDR updates. UDRs in the spoke VNets enforce forced tunneling, ensuring that all outbound traffic is directed through hub NVAs for security inspection, threat monitoring, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and management effort and lacks centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provide connectivity but do not enforce centralized inspection or security policies. High availability is ensured with multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and compliance. Centralized inspection allows auditing, threat intelligence integration, and consistent policy enforcement. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, maintaining operational efficiency and scalability.

Question 147:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server provides dynamic route learning and advertisement between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks using BGP. This approach removes the need for manual route updates, reduces operational errors, and supports scalable hybrid environments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone and difficult to manage at scale. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, allows limited route propagation but does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate BGP routes. Route Server ensures routing consistency, operational efficiency, and scalability. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory standards. High availability ensures continuous propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs are aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and learned on-premises routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and automated network management. Organizations benefit from reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified operations.

Question 148:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection through hub NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs monitor and inspect traffic for compliance, security, and operational purposes. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes via BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and hub NVAs, removing the need for manual UDR configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all outbound traffic through NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity and cost while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing the addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 149:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale in dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, allows limited propagation and does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 150:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 151:

Your organization wants all outbound traffic from multiple VNets to be inspected through centralized NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke design is ideal for centralized inspection of outbound traffic while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs in the hub act as central inspection points for security monitoring, threat detection, logging, and compliance. Azure Route Server uses BGP to propagate routes dynamically between hub NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spoke VNets enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic is inspected by hub NVAs before reaching external destinations. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, cost, and monitoring overhead. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and compromises isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provide connectivity but do not enforce centralized security policies or inspection. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain compliance and operational efficiency. Forced tunneling ensures inspection of all outbound traffic. Dynamic BGP routing ensures adaptation to on-premises network changes, minimizing misconfigurations. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing operational simplicity, centralized control, scalability, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting operational efficiency and scalability.

Question 152:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. This eliminates manual route updates, reduces operational errors, and supports large-scale hybrid deployments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, labor-intensive, and does not scale for dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, allows limited route propagation but does not enable bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate BGP routes. Using Route Server ensures routing consistency, reduces operational overhead, and supports scalable deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing guarantees correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and automated network management. Organizations gain automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 153:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection through NVAs in the hub while maintaining spoke isolation. NVAs inspect traffic for security, compliance, and operational monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between hub NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic is routed through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity and costs while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provide connectivity but do not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risks. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 154:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, labor-intensive, and do not scale in dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and streamlined network management.

Question 155:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provide connectivity but do not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 156:

Your organization wants to ensure that all outbound traffic from multiple VNets is inspected through centralized NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. Hub NVAs serve as inspection points for security monitoring, logging, threat detection, and regulatory compliance. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR configuration. UDRs in spoke VNets enforce forced tunneling, ensuring that all outbound traffic passes through NVAs for inspection. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and monitoring effort while lacking centralized control. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and compromises isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provide connectivity but do not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVAs and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain compliance and operational efficiency. Dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement, while new spokes can be added without modifying UDRs.

Question 157:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between Azure VNets and on-premises networks to eliminate manual route configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. This approach eliminates manual route configuration, reduces operational errors, and supports scalable hybrid deployments. Option A, static routes, is error-prone and difficult to maintain in dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, allows limited propagation but does not enable bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate BGP routes. Using Route Server ensures routing consistency, reduces operational overhead, and supports scalable deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with corporate and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing guarantees correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs are aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and automated network management. Organizations gain automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified network management.

Question 158:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic via NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound traffic inspection through NVAs in the hub while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs inspect traffic for security, compliance, and operational monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between hub NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR configuration. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all outbound traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity and costs while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provide connectivity but do not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risk. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing new spokes to be added without modifying UDRs.

Question 159:

Your organization wants NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual configuration. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and learn routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale in dynamic hybrid environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not support bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. With Azure Route Server in place, NVAs maintain continuous awareness of all reachable prefixes within the environment. This awareness includes Azure-generated system routes, user-defined routes, and on-premises prefixes learned through BGP. Because NVAs receive these updates dynamically, they can make more accurate forwarding decisions and apply security or inspection policies based on real-time routing information. This allows traffic to be evaluated and routed appropriately without relying on outdated static entries or manual adjustments. As a result, the entire routing and inspection path becomes more stable and predictable, even during periods of rapid change or network growth.

Azure VNets also automatically benefit from updated routing information without requiring administrative intervention. When new subnets, spoke VNets, or hybrid prefixes are introduced into the network, the Route Server distributes these routes consistently across NVAs and Azure’s routing infrastructure. This prevents routing inconsistencies that often occur when multiple administrators manually modify UDRs in large estates. The automatic propagation of routes greatly reduces the risk of misconfigurations, accidental routing loops, or unreachable subnets. It also ensures that workloads in Azure seamlessly communicate with on-premises systems, regardless of how frequently the network topology evolves.

On-premises prefixes learned via ExpressRoute or VPN Gateway propagate efficiently into Azure through the Route Server, eliminating the need to replicate these routes manually across multiple UDR tables. This is especially useful in enterprise environments that maintain extensive on-premises networks with many segments and dynamic routing changes. As organizations scale their hybrid infrastructure, BGP ensures that updates flow consistently from the data center to Azure and across the cloud network. This makes Route Server a robust foundation for hybrid connectivity, improving reliability and simplifying long-term maintenance.

Route Server can coexist with UDRs when priorities are properly configured. This coexistence allows administrators to maintain fine-grained control over specific traffic flows while still leveraging the benefits of dynamic routing. In scenarios where traffic inspection, security zoning, or application-specific routing are required, UDRs can override BGP-learned routes without breaking the dynamic routing ecosystem. This flexibility allows organizations to tailor their traffic engineering strategies depending on workload requirements, compliance rules, or operational preferences.

The design aligns closely with AZ-700 best practices, which emphasize automated routing, centralized security inspection, operational simplicity, and scalability in hybrid network architectures. Route Server supports these principles by enabling both dynamic route exchange and seamless integration with NVAs. This approach reduces manual workload and ensures that routing policies are applied consistently across regions, VNets, and hybrid connections. Organizations deploying large-scale hub-and-spoke designs, multi-region architectures, or SD-WAN solutions gain significant operational benefits.

Overall, organizations adopting Azure Route Server experience improvements across multiple operational dimensions. Automated routing minimizes human error, reduces the time required to deploy new workloads, and enables smoother cloud expansion. Secure connectivity is strengthened because NVAs operate with accurate, up-to-date routing information, ensuring that security controls apply consistently to all traffic paths. Streamlined management further enhances efficiency by consolidating routing intelligence within Azure rather than dispersing it across numerous UDR configurations. This results in a more resilient, scalable, and manageable network architecture suitable for modern enterprise environments.

Question 160:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, ensuring all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provide connectivity but do not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.