Microsoft MS-700 Microsoft 365 Certified: Teams Administrator Associate Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q161-180

Visit here for our full Microsoft MS-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 161: 

You need to prevent users from sending voice messages in Teams mobile. What should you configure? 

A) Messaging policy
B) Meeting policy
C) App setup policy
D) Teams update policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation:

A messaging policy is the correct configuration when the requirement involves controlling features specifically tied to user interactions within chats and channels in Microsoft Teams. Messaging policy is designed to regulate core chat behaviors such as voice messaging, read receipts, user-to-user communication permissions, priority notifications, and whether users can edit or delete their own messages. When an organization wants to prevent voice messages from being sent through the Teams mobile app, the setting that disables voice messages resides within the messaging policy because this policy governs the chat experience across desktop and mobile clients. Since the voice message feature is part of the chat function itself, adjusting the messaging policy effectively restricts it.

A meeting policy, on the other hand, only affects in-meeting behaviors and controls features such as recording, transcription, screen sharing, participant roles, and meeting chat. It does not regulate general chat features that occur outside the meeting scenario. Voice messages are sent through standard chat, not during a meeting, so a meeting policy cannot fulfill the requirement.

An app setup policy determines which applications are pinned, installed, or made available to the user interface. While this policy controls what users see in their Teams environment, it does not have the capability to disable chat-specific features such as voice messages. It influences discoverability and placement of apps but does not handle messaging behaviors or restrictions on message formats.

A Teams update policy is entirely unrelated to message functionality. Update policies determine how quickly the Teams client receives new features or updates (standard release vs targeted release). They have no ability to restrict specific actions like sending voice messages, nor can they disable chat-level capabilities.

Therefore, the messaging policy is the only configuration with the relevant controls and the correct governance scope. It directly manages what forms of communication users can employ within Teams chat, whether on desktop or mobile. If the goal is to block voice messaging across the organization or for a specific set of users, the administrator must adjust the messaging policy settings and disable the voice message option. This ensures consistent enforcement on mobile clients where the voice message feature is typically used.
This makes messaging policy the correct answer.

Question 162: 

You want to allow only a specific group to create private channels in Teams. What should you configure? 

A) Teams policy
B) Retention policy
C) Compliance policy
D) Conditional access

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

A Teams policy is the correct configuration when the requirement involves controlling the creation of private channels within Teams. Private channel creation is a governance feature embedded directly into Teams policies, which allow administrators to determine whether users can create private channels, shared channels, or standard channels. If the organization wants only a specific security group or subset of users to have the ability to create private channels, the Teams policy provides the precise controls to enforce this restriction. By applying a customized Teams policy to a designated user group, administrators can allow or block private channel creation based on organizational needs.

A retention policy is unrelated to the creation of private channels. Retention policies control the lifecycle of stored content, determining whether Teams chat messages, channel messages, SharePoint files, or other Microsoft 365 data should be retained for compliance or deleted after a specified period. This type of policy enforces regulatory requirements for data preservation but does not govern channel creation capabilities or user permissions.

A compliance policy similarly deals with regulatory or security requirements, not structural Teams configuration. Compliance policies may include data loss prevention rules, communication compliance, sensitivity labeling, or insider risk management. None of these allow administrators to determine who can create private channels. They focus on how data is used, accessed, and governed, not on which collaboration structures users are allowed to create.

Conditional access also cannot control private channel creation. Conditional access defines rules for identities, devices, network locations, or application access conditions. It manages login context and security posture but has no influence over workspace capabilities such as channel creation. Conditional access ensures secure access; it does not determine collaboration permissions inside Teams.

Therefore, when the requirement is to ensure that only specific users or groups can create private channels, the administrator must configure the Teams policy. Assigning different Teams policies to different user groups allows granular control over which channel types can be created. This ensures governance consistency and prevents unauthorized or unmanaged private spaces within Teams, which is often necessary for compliance, operational oversight, or reducing information fragmentation.
Thus, Teams policy is the correct answer.

Question 163: 

You need to prevent users from downloading meeting recordings. What should you modify? 

A) SharePoint sharing settings
B) Teams app permission policy
C) OneDrive sharing settings
D) Stream retention policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

The correct configuration to prevent users from downloading meeting recordings is found in SharePoint sharing settings, because Teams meeting recordings are stored in SharePoint (for channel meetings) or OneDrive (for non-channel meetings). These recordings inherit permissions from the storage location. Restricting download capability therefore requires configuring SharePoint settings that limit file access behavior, restrict the “download” permission, or shift the sharing model to a view-only mode. SharePoint provides granular control over permissions, link settings, and file-handling restrictions that directly affect recorded meetings. Administrators can modify site-level or library-level settings to ensure users can view but not download recordings, satisfying the organization’s compliance or security objectives.

A Teams app permission policy is not involved in regulating access to files or recordings. App permission policies dictate which apps—Microsoft apps, third-party apps, or custom apps—users are allowed to install or interact with. They do not extend to storage-level permissions or file download capabilities. Adjusting app permissions would not affect whether users can download recordings.

OneDrive sharing settings might seem relevant because non-channel meeting recordings are stored in OneDrive; however, the question requires preventing downloads “in general,” not specifically for OneDrive. The standardized and recommended method for controlling download permissions for recordings is to use SharePoint-level controls because Teams relies on SharePoint frameworks for both OneDrive and SharePoint file governance. OneDrive sharing settings influence personal file sharing behavior, but the broader and appropriate control for disabling downloads across Teams recordings resides in SharePoint’s permission model. SharePoint’s settings unify file governance across Microsoft 365 workloads, ensuring consistency through its centralized management interface.

A Stream retention policy governs deletion or archival timelines for video content stored in Microsoft Stream (on SharePoint). Retention settings determine how long recordings are kept before being automatically deleted, archived, or retained for regulatory requirements. However, retention rules do not affect permissions related to downloading or viewing the content. They only influence content lifespan, not user capabilities.

Thus, the correct action is to modify SharePoint sharing settings, which provide the necessary mechanisms to prevent downloading while still allowing playback through the browser, if desired. These settings ensure proper protection of meeting recordings and enable secure access governance.
Therefore, SharePoint sharing settings is the correct answer.

Question 164: 

You want every new Team to have the same tabs by default. What should you configure? 

A) Team template
B) Compliance policy
C) Update policy
D) Live events policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

A team template is the correct configuration when the requirement is to ensure that every newly created Team contains the same predefined set of tabs, channels, and apps. Team templates in Microsoft Teams allow administrators to standardize the setup of new teams, ensuring consistency across the organization. Templates can include predefined channels, pinned tabs such as Planner, OneNote, or SharePoint pages, and even certain apps. When users create a team based on a template, the structure instantly appears as specified, reducing setup time and increasing governance and uniformity. This makes team templates the ideal tool for enforcing organizational standards.

A compliance policy plays no role in configuring the structure of a team. Compliance policies focus on regulatory adherence, controlling how data is handled, protected, and monitored. Examples include sensitivity labeling, communication compliance, or data loss prevention. While these policies determine how content is treated, they do not influence how teams are created or what tabs appear by default.

A Teams update policy controls how and when Teams client updates roll out to users. It affects feature availability timing—such as whether users receive features early or on the standard track—but does not provide any ability to configure team structures or default tabs. Update policies deal exclusively with client versioning and feature rollout, not workspace configuration.

A live events policy governs permissions related to Microsoft Teams live events. It determines who can schedule live events, which production methods are available, and which users can participate in roles such as presenters or producers. Live events policy does not affect regular Teams workspace configuration, channel structure, or tab deployment.

Team templates are the only option designed specifically to enforce standardized layouts for new teams. By configuring a team template, administrators can ensure that each new team aligns with organizational best practices, includes the correct collaboration tools, and minimizes user misconfiguration. This feature is particularly useful in large organizations where consistency is important for training, support, and governance alignment.

Team templates streamline onboarding and help maintain predictable structures across departments, projects, or business units. Because the requirement is explicitly about controlling default tabs for every new team, the correct solution is to configure a team template. Thus, team template is the correct answer.

Question 165: 

You need to route PSTN calls to different SBCs by user location. What should you configure? 

A) Voice routing policies
B) Tenant dial plan
C) App setup policy
D) Meeting policy

Answer:  A) 

Explanation: 

A voice routing policy is the correct configuration when the requirement involves routing PSTN calls through different Session Border Controllers (SBCs) based on user location. Voice routing policies are central to Direct Routing in Microsoft Teams. They determine which PSTN usages, voice routes, and SBC endpoints a user should use when placing outbound calls. By assigning different voice routing policies to users in different geographic or organizational locations, administrators can ensure that calls are processed through the appropriate SBC, optimizing call quality, reducing latency, complying with regional telephony rules, or balancing resource loads. Voice routing policies offer per-user granularity, making them the precise tool for this requirement.

A tenant dial plan handles normalization rules, which convert user-dialed numbers into standardized E.164 formats. While dial plans influence how numbers are interpreted, they do not dictate which SBC routes the call uses. Dial plans make dialing easier but cannot route calls based on location.

An app setup policy defines which applications are pinned, installed, or visible within Teams. It is unrelated to telephony routing or PSTN behaviors. It cannot influence SBC selection or voice routing logic.

A meeting policy governs meeting-related experiences such as recording, transcription, screen sharing, lobby settings, and participant permissions. It has nothing to do with PSTN calling, SBC routing decisions, or outbound call handling.

Voice routing policies uniquely determine how outbound calls are processed within Direct Routing configurations. These policies link users to specific PSTN usages and voice routes that point to SBCs. Organizations often use separate voice routing policies for different regions—for example, routing calls from European users to a European SBC while routing calls from U.S. users to a U.S.-based SBC. This not only improves regulatory alignment but also enhances call efficiency and reliability. Because the requirement is explicitly about routing PSTN calls to different SBCs based on the user’s location, the correct approach is to configure and assign the appropriate voice routing policies.

Thus, voice routing policies is the correct answer.

Question 166: 

You want to block anonymous users from joining Teams webinars. What should you configure?

A) Webinar policy
B) Messaging policy
C) Voice policy
D) Update policy

Answer: A)

Explanation: 

A webinar policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to block anonymous users from joining Teams webinars, because it contains the controls necessary to regulate registration, security, and attendance settings for webinar events. Webinar policies allow administrators to specify whether users can schedule webinars at all, whether external or anonymous attendees may register or join, and whether registration form fields can be customized. Blocking anonymous users is a security and governance measure specific to webinars, and the webinar policy provides direct control over this capability. Adjusting the policy ensures that only authenticated and authorized participants can access webinars, aligning with organizational requirements for confidentiality or attendee validation.

A messaging policy regulates chat behavior such as message deletion, voice messages, read receipts, and user permissions for chat-related features. It has no impact on webinar attendance, registration, or meeting entry rules. Messaging policies exclusively govern chat interactions inside Teams and not event-level access.

A voice policy controls PSTN-related calling behaviors such as call forwarding, simultaneous ringing, call delegation, and other telephony features. None of these configurations relate to webinars, attendee eligibility, or meeting access for anonymous participants. Voice policy governs calling, not event participation permissions.

An update policy determines how Teams client updates are delivered to users—either standard release or targeted release. This affects feature rollout speed but has no relevance to who can join a webinar or whether anonymous users are permitted. Update policies do not control security, registration, or participation features.

Therefore, because the requirement deals specifically with anonymous attendance at webinars, and Teams provides a policy dedicated to controlling webinar scheduling and participation settings, the appropriate configuration is the webinar policy. It is the only option aligned with the feature’s governance model and designed to enforce the restriction.
Thus, webinar policy is the correct answer.

Question 167: 

You need to stop users from installing third-party apps in Teams. What should you modify?

A) App permission policy
B) App setup policy
C) Meeting policy
D) Teams device policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

An app permission policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to prevent users from installing or using third-party apps within Microsoft Teams. App permission policies determine which apps are allowed, blocked, or restricted for different users. Administrators can disable access to Microsoft apps, third-party marketplace apps, and custom internal apps by adjusting the permissions within the policy. If the goal is to block third-party applications, the administrator can configure the policy to disallow all apps from the Teams app store, preventing installation entirely. This ensures compliance, maintains security, and provides a consistent application environment.

An app setup policy determines which apps appear pinned in the Teams client but does not prevent users from installing or accessing other apps unless those apps are already blocked by an app permission policy. Setup policies influence visibility and placement, not permission.

A meeting policy governs meeting features such as chat, recording, transcription, and participant roles. It has no relationship to app installation or third-party app access.

A Teams device policy applies to Teams-certified devices such as phones, displays, and meeting room systems. It regulates device behavior—not user app permissions.

Because app installation is controlled only through the app permission policy framework, the correct solution is the app permission policy. Thus, the app permission policy is correct.

Question 168: 

You want to restrict who can schedule Teams live events. What should you adjust?

A) Live events policy
B) Meeting policy
C) App permission policy
D) Security group membership

Answer: A)

Explanation: 

A live events policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to restrict who can schedule Teams live events. Live events policies include controls for whether users can create live events, which production methods they can use (Teams or external encoder), and whether recording and transcription are allowed. By modifying the policy and assigning it only to authorized users or security groups, administrators can determine who is allowed to schedule live events. This prevents unauthorized users from creating large broadcasts, ensuring governance and resource control.

A meeting policy covers standard Teams meetings rather than live events. It controls features like screen sharing, participant roles, and meeting recording but does not determine who can schedule broadcast-style live events.

An app permission policy regulates allowed, blocked, or restricted apps but does not influence live event scheduling capabilities.

Security group membership does not itself enforce any policy restriction; groups are used only to assign policies, not to control scheduling directly.

Because the requirement explicitly targets scheduling permissions for live events, only the live events policy provides the needed configuration.
Thus, live events policy is correct.

Question 169: 

You want guest users to chat but not share files. What should you configure?

A) SharePoint sharing settings
B) Guest access settings
C) Meeting policy
D) Compliance policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

SharePoint sharing settings are the correct configuration when the requirement is to allow guest users to chat but prevent them from sharing files. Guest chat permissions are controlled through Teams guest access settings, which inherently allow messaging. However, file sharing for guests relies entirely on SharePoint and OneDrive external sharing configuration because Teams stores all files in SharePoint-backed document libraries. When guests attempt to share or upload content, their ability is determined by SharePoint’s external sharing model, permission levels, and link settings. By restricting SharePoint external sharing, administrators can disable file sharing for guests while still allowing chat communication.

Guest access settings in Teams enable or disable guest participation but do not contain granular controls for file-sharing restrictions. They allow guests to chat, join teams, and participate in channels but do not override SharePoint permissions controlling file upload and access.

A meeting policy governs meeting behavior and has no relationship to file sharing in channels or chats.

A compliance policy covers regulatory or security requirements such as retention, communication compliance, or sensitivity labels, but does not control permissions for file storage or sharing.

Because only SharePoint determines file access rights and upload permissions for guests, the correct configuration is SharePoint sharing settings. Thus, SharePoint sharing settings are correct.

Question 170: 

You want to enable transcription for all Teams meetings. What should you configure?

A) Meeting policy
B) App setup policy
C) Teams update policy
D) Device policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

A meeting policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to enable transcription for all Teams meetings. Transcription is a meeting feature that determines whether spoken content in a meeting can be converted into written text. Meeting policies provide direct controls for enabling or disabling transcription, cloud recording, participant permissions, and features such as meeting chat, reactions, and content sharing. By enabling transcription within the meeting policy assigned to users, administrators ensure that every meeting they organize supports transcription automatically or at least provides the capability.

An app setup policy controls which applications are pinned or installed by default in Teams and does not influence meeting-level features such as transcription.

A Teams update policy affects when users receive client updates—standard or targeted release—but does not activate or deactivate features such as transcription.

A device policy controls Microsoft Teams-certified hardware devices but does not influence meeting features or cloud-based services like transcription.

Since transcription is exclusively governed by meeting policies, the correct answer is the meeting policy. Thus, the meeting policy is correct.

Question 171: 

You want to enforce watermarking for all internal meetings. What do you configure?

A) Meeting policy
B) Compliance policy
C) App permission
D) Teams template

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

A meeting policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to enforce watermarking for all internal meetings because this feature is controlled entirely at the meeting-policy layer. Meeting policies govern a wide range of meeting behaviors, including security-oriented features such as watermarking, recording permissions, transcription settings, participant chat controls, screen-sharing permissions, and attendee capabilities. Watermarking is a security enhancement that overlays participant information on shared content or video streams to discourage data leakage. Because watermarking is applied during a meeting session and determines how visual content appears to attendees, it resides solely within meeting policies. By enabling watermarking in the appropriate meeting policy and assigning that policy to internal users, the organization ensures consistent protection across all meetings that those users organize or attend.

A compliance policy handles rules related to content governance, regulatory requirements, retention, classification, communication supervision, or data protection. While compliance policies are important for controlling how data is stored, monitored, and preserved, they do not control live meeting behaviors. Compliance tools do not apply watermarks to meetings because watermarking is not a content-retention or data-classification setting—it is a real-time meeting security feature governed elsewhere.

An app permission policy determines which applications users can install or access within Teams. It governs Microsoft apps, third-party apps, and custom apps. App permission settings do not influence meeting security behaviors such as watermarking, and they cannot enforce visual overlays or content-protection mechanisms during live meetings.

A Teams template is used to standardize the structure of newly created teams by defining channels, tabs, and apps. Templates help maintain workspace consistency but do not affect meeting configuration. They are completely unrelated to meeting-level security features such as watermarking.

Watermarking requirements are entirely focused on how meetings behave in real time, how sensitive content is presented, and how organizational users interact within meeting sessions. Meeting policies are the only configuration object that provides fine-grained control over these capabilities. Administrators can create different meeting policies for internal and external users or require watermarking for all meetings by configuring the appropriate global or custom policy settings.

Because this requirement directly concerns a meeting-specific security control, the correct configuration to enforce watermarking for all internal meetings is the meeting policy.

Question 172: 

You must prevent PSTN participants from unmuting themselves in meetings. What should you configure?

A) Meeting policy
B) Voice routing
C) Calling plan
D) Teams admin role

Answer: A) 

Explanation:

A meeting policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to prevent PSTN participants from unmuting themselves in meetings. Meeting policies contain the feature controls that determine what participants can do during a meeting, whether they join through the Teams client, browser, mobile device, or PSTN phone dial-in. When PSTN callers join a meeting, their interaction capabilities—such as unmuting, speaking, raising a hand, or initiating DTMF commands—are governed by settings under meeting policies. If the organization needs to restrict PSTN attendees from unmuting themselves, the administrator must configure the “Allow participants to unmute” setting within the meeting policy and ensure it applies to the relevant users. This ensures that all PSTN callers remain muted unless a meeting organizer or presenter manually unmutes them.

A voice routing policy is unrelated to meeting permissions. Voice routing determines how outbound PSTN calls are routed to Session Border Controllers (SBCs) or calling infrastructures. It defines PSTN usages and routes but does not govern how PSTN attendees behave once inside a meeting. It controls the telephony path, not meeting interaction capabilities.

A calling plan provides PSTN connectivity through Microsoft’s cloud telephony service. Calling plans define phone numbers and PSTN access but do not control in-meeting permissions for PSTN attendees. Whether participants can mute or unmute themselves is not influenced by calling plan assignments.

A Teams administrator role determines what an admin can configure within the Teams admin center but does not apply behavioral settings to meetings. Admin roles define privileges, not meeting-specific behaviors.

Since the requirement is explicitly about restricting PSTN user capabilities inside meetings, the only configuration that controls participant permissions within meeting sessions is the meeting policy. By adjusting this policy, administrators can enforce consistent behavior across all PSTN attendees, ensuring better meeting control, security, and orderly communication.

Thus, the correct answer is the meeting policy.

Question 173: 

You want Teams devices to auto-sign-in using shared accounts. What should you configure?

A) Teams device policy
B) Conditional access
C) Meeting policy
D) Update policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

A Teams device policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to ensure that Teams devices automatically sign in using shared accounts. Teams device policies govern how Teams-certified devices—such as Teams Rooms systems, Teams displays, Teams phones, and collaboration bars—behave when interacting with user accounts or shared modes. Shared device mode is a specific configuration designed for devices placed in communal areas such as meeting spaces, kiosks, hot-desks, or shared workstations. It allows a single shared identity to be used on the device without requiring individual user sign-ins. Device policies determine whether the device supports shared mode, how it handles sign-in behaviors, and how users interact with the device once signed in. When configured correctly, the Teams device policy ensures that the device operates under a consistent shared identity, automatically re-establishing that identity as needed.

Conditional access policies govern authentication, device compliance, sign-in risk, geographic location restrictions, and multi-factor authentication rules. While important for overall identity security, conditional access does not configure Teams device features or define whether devices operate in shared mode.

A meeting policy focuses solely on meeting-related features and does not influence how physical Teams devices authenticate or behave. Meeting policies govern transcription, recording, lobby controls, screen sharing, and participant permissions—not device sign-in scenarios.

A Teams update policy regulates when Teams clients receive feature updates, deciding between targeted or standard release rings. Update policies have no effect on Teams device sign-in behaviors or shared account capabilities. They govern software rollout, not identity modes.

Because the requirement centers around shared mode sign-in—a feature exclusively controlled through Teams device policies—the correct configuration is the Teams device policy. It is the only policy type designed to manage the behavior of Teams-certified hardware and ensure consistent sign-in using shared accounts.

Thus, the correct answer is Teams device policy.

Question 174: 

You want certain users to receive preview Teams features early. What should you assign?

A) Teams update policy
B) Teams template
C) Live events policy
D) Meeting policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

A Teams update policy is the correct configuration when the requirement is to provide certain users early access to preview features in Microsoft Teams. Update policies determine whether users receive features through the standard release channel or the targeted release channel. The targeted release channel provides early access to upcoming Teams features for testing, piloting, and feedback. By creating or modifying an update policy and assigning it only to selected pilot groups, administrators can control which users receive preview capabilities while others remain on the stable release path. Update policies are specifically designed to manage feature availability timing and provide structured rollout governance.

A Teams template is designed to standardize the structure of newly created teams by defining default channels, tabs, and apps. Templates ensure consistent workspace creation but do not affect feature rollout, preview settings, or client updates.

A live events policy governs who can schedule or produce live events, what production methods they can use, and whether recording or transcription is allowed for broadcast-style sessions. It does not influence Teams client updates or preview features.

A meeting policy regulates meeting features such as screen sharing, recording, participant capabilities, and watermarking. It does not manage client update timing and has no effect on preview feature access.

Because preview features in Teams are released through the update-policy mechanism, only the Teams update policy can selectively grant specific users early access. This allows organizations to test features before broad deployment, ensure compatibility with workflows, and evaluate performance or training requirements.

Thus, the correct answer is Teams update policy.

Question 175: 

You want to block users from creating new Teams. What should you modify?

A) Azure AD group creation settings
B) Meeting policy
C) App setup policy
D) Teams device policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

Azure AD group creation settings (now part of Microsoft Entra ID) are the correct configuration when the requirement is to block users from creating new Teams. Team creation in Microsoft Teams is directly tied to Microsoft 365 Group creation because every new team generates an associated Microsoft 365 Group. Therefore, controlling whether users can create teams requires controlling whether they can create Microsoft 365 Groups. This control resides not in Teams policies but in Azure AD. Administrators can restrict group creation permissions so that only designated users or security groups are allowed to create Microsoft 365 Groups. As a result, only those allowed users can create new Teams, effectively preventing unauthorized team creation and limiting sprawl.

A meeting policy governs meeting-specific settings such as recording, transcription, participant permissions, screen sharing, and content behaviors. It has no influence over whether users can create teams and does not affect Microsoft 365 Group provisioning.

An app setup policy determines which applications appear pinned or installed within the Teams interface. It affects user experience and app visibility but does not restrict team creation or group provisioning capabilities.

A Teams device policy regulates how Teams-certified hardware devices operate, including shared mode configurations and device-specific behaviors. It does not impact administrative permissions related to team creation or Microsoft 365 Group creation.

Because team creation is inherently dependent on Microsoft 365 Group creation, and only Azure AD controls who can create groups, the correct configuration is adjusting Azure AD group creation settings. By limiting group creation capabilities, administrators maintain governance, prevent unnecessary team proliferation, and enforce organizational structure.

Thus, the correct answer is Azure AD group creation settings.

Question 176: 

You want to force recordings to auto-expire after 30 days. What should you set?

A) Recording expiration policy
B) Retention label
C) Teams app policy
D) Meeting policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

When evaluating how to enforce the automatic expiration of recordings after a defined duration, it is important to understand the distinction between policies that govern content lifecycle, policies that regulate compliance control, and policies that merely influence user experience. The first choice represents the capability directly tied to managing the expiration of meeting recordings stored in OneDrive for Business and SharePoint. This control allows administrators to define a default period, such as thirty days, after which recordings are automatically deleted unless users intentionally override deletion. This mechanism ensures consistent cleanup of stored content, supports storage governance, and helps organizations comply with internal data minimization standards. Because the requirement explicitly seeks time-based expiration of recordings, the first choice aligns exactly with the intended result.

The second choice relates to classification and long-term retention needs rather than short-term expiration. It allows organizations to preserve content for required durations, manage regulatory obligations, and implement structured recordkeeping rules. This mechanism typically is used to extend retention, not shorten it or impose automatic deletion after short cycles. It therefore does not solve the organizational goal of ensuring recordings vanish automatically after thirty days.

The third choice focuses on defining which applications are available within the environment. Its purpose lies in controlling which apps users may interact with, pinning apps within the Teams interface, and controlling permissions related to third-party or custom applications. This choice does not deal with recordings, storage, or content lifecycle, and therefore cannot enforce expiration.

The fourth choice governs meeting settings such as who can present, lobby behavior, cloud recording permissions, and other participant controls. Although this type of policy can allow or block the ability to record meetings, it lacks the capability to define how long recordings are kept or automatically deleted. Its scope is meeting behavior, not storage governance.

For all these reasons, the first choice is correct because it is the only mechanism designed specifically to manage recording expiration schedules, giving administrators direct control over default deletion timing and ensuring that recordings automatically expire after thirty days without requiring user intervention.

Question 177: 

You need users to join meetings using a custom background image. What should you configure?

A) Meeting policy
B) Device policy
C) App setup policy
D) Teams template

Answer: A) 

Explanation:

Controlling whether users can apply specific background settings in meetings depends on understanding which administrative controls influence video features and user experience during meetings. The first choice is the administrative control that governs meeting behaviors and visual options, including whether background effects are allowed, whether users can upload their own custom images, and whether certain video effects are disabled entirely. Because the goal is to enforce the use of custom backgrounds during meetings, this type of policy contains the setting required to either permit or restrict background uploads. It acts directly on the meeting experience rather than device or team structure, making it the suitable mechanism for enabling custom image usage.

The second choice is centered on hardware-related configurations, such as settings applied to Teams-certified devices like phones, panels, displays, and collaboration bars. These controls ensure consistent operational behavior, firmware configurations, and device capabilities. However, they do not govern in-meeting personalization such as background image use, making them unrelated to the requirement.

The third choice concerns controlling which apps appear in the Teams client. Although it helps manage user access to built-in and third-party applications, its scope is not tied to visual meeting features. It cannot mandate or restrict background images because it deals solely with applications rather than meeting-based settings. This makes it insufficient to address the background image requirement.

The fourth choice influences predefined channel structures, tabs, and team elements for consistent team creation. This mechanism organizes collaborative spaces but does not affect meeting configuration or video personalization. It therefore has no relevance to enforcing background requirements during online meetings.

Since the requirement focuses on allowing or managing custom background images within meetings, the first choice is the correct one, as it contains the settings that directly govern video effects and background customization.

Question 178: 

You want to restrict which users can use Walkie Talkie in Teams. What do you configure?

A) App permission policy
B) Device policy
C) Meeting policy
D) Consultant policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation:

Restricting access to specific applications requires a clear understanding of the mechanisms that control application availability and user permissions inside the Teams environment. The first choice enables administrators to explicitly define which applications users are permitted to use, block, or allow. Walkie Talkie is delivered as an application within Teams, and because it is classified as an app rather than a meeting component or device feature, access is controlled exclusively through application permission controls. This type of configuration allows administrators to make the app available only to designated groups or remove it entirely from user access. It is therefore the mechanism that satisfies the requirement of restricting which individuals can utilize Walkie Talkie capabilities.

The second choice centers on device hardware settings and behavior. It manages settings applied to Teams devices such as displays, phones, or panels. Although Walkie Talkie can be used on mobile devices and Teams-certified hardware, access to the Walkie Talkie feature is not determined by the device configuration but by application permission. Thus, this mechanism cannot be used to restrict user access to the feature.

The third choice controls participant settings, meeting options, and overall meeting experience. Walkie Talkie is neither a meeting feature nor a meeting policy configuration, making this option unrelated. Adjusting meeting settings cannot restrict access to this communication tool.

The fourth choice does not exist within the administrative structure of Teams. It therefore provides no means of controlling Walkie Talkie usage.

Based on these evaluations, the first choice is correct because it directly manages which applications users may access, thereby enabling precise control over Walkie Talkie availability.

Question 179:

You want every Teams channel to have a predefined folder structure. What should you configure?

A) SharePoint site template
B) Teams template
C) App setup policy
D) Messaging policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

When new Teams channels are created, corresponding folders are automatically generated within the connected SharePoint site. Because the goal is to enforce a predefined structure of folders, attention must be placed on how SharePoint manages document libraries and folder templates. The first choice enables administrators to define a consistent structure applied automatically whenever a new site or library is provisioned. Since every Teams channel corresponds directly to a document library folder within SharePoint, defining the preferred structure at the SharePoint level ensures uniformity across all channels created within Teams.

The second choice concentrates on establishing predefined channels, tabs, and apps when creating a new team. While this allows consistent team layout, it does not manage the structure created inside document libraries. Channels created after team creation will not inherit folder templates defined by this choice, making it insufficient to achieve predefined folder structures inside SharePoint.

The third choice concerns app availability and pinned apps in the Teams interface. It cannot influence folder creation, document library structure, or SharePoint content architecture.

The fourth choice governs settings related to user messaging behavior, such as deleting messages or using gifs and stickers. It has no bearing on file storage, folder organization, or SharePoint document management.

The first choice is correct because folder structures originate in SharePoint, and SharePoint templates provide the needed capability for defining consistent folder hierarchies across all Teams channels.

Question 180: 

You want to assign different Teams licenses automatically based on department. What should you configure?

A) Group-based licensing
B) Teams update policy
C) Meeting policy
D) App setup policy

Answer: A) 

Explanation: 

Automating license assignment requires a mechanism that associates licenses with Azure AD groups so that membership changes instantly update assigned services. The first choice allows administrators to link specific Microsoft 365 or Teams licenses to security groups. When departments are mapped to groups, membership determines which license is automatically applied. This satisfies the requirement for automating departmental license distribution.

The second choice determines how users receive preview features. It deals only with client update experience and cannot assign licenses.

The third choice regulates meeting settings, participant controls, and recording behavior. It has no capability to assign or remove licenses dynamically.

The fourth choice manages app availability and pinning behavior within Teams but does not interact with licensing.

Because only the first choice allows automated license assignment based on Azure AD group membership, it is the correct configuration.