Microsoft SC-200 Microsoft Security Operations Analyst Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 4 Q61-80

Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-200 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 61:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA for users accessing SharePoint and OneDrive from unmanaged devices, but allow seamless access from compliant corporate devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Information Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Security Defaults

Answer: A) – Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access enables organizations to enforce adaptive authentication policies based on user identity, device state, location, and risk. In this scenario, the goal is to require MFA for unmanaged devices while allowing seamless access from compliant corporate devices. Conditional Access provides granular control to target specific users, applications, or device conditions.

Administrators can create policies that target SharePoint and OneDrive, define device compliance as a condition, and apply the “require MFA” control only for devices that are unmanaged or noncompliant. This ensures external or personal devices are challenged for MFA, protecting sensitive data stored in cloud applications, while corporate-managed devices continue to provide frictionless access.

Integration with Microsoft Endpoint Manager allows Azure AD to verify device compliance, checking for configurations such as encryption, antivirus status, and device enrollment. Conditional Access can also incorporate location-based controls, such as enforcing MFA only for sign-ins from outside the corporate network.

Other solutions do not provide this adaptive, context-aware access enforcement. Microsoft Information Protection classifies and protects content, but does not enforce MFA. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors user sessions but does not enforce sign-in requirements. Security Defaults apply MFA universally without differentiation between trusted and unmanaged devices, which could reduce productivity.

In practice, using Conditional Access ensures risk-based MFA enforcement, protecting sensitive SharePoint and OneDrive content while maintaining usability for trusted users and devices.

Question 62:

Your organization wants to detect suspicious file activity, such as mass downloads or unusual sharing behavior, in Microsoft 365 applications. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Cloud App Security

Explanation:

Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) allows organizations to monitor cloud application activity to detect insider threats, compromised accounts, or accidental data leaks. It leverages machine learning to create baseline user activity profiles and identifies anomalies such as excessive downloads, unusual sharing behavior, or access from atypical locations.

Once anomalous activity is detected, administrators can configure real-time action, including session blocking, alerts, or access restrictions. For instance, if a user downloads hundreds of sensitive financial documents from SharePoint late at night, MCAS can trigger an alert and automatically block further downloads, preventing potential data exfiltration.

Session-level policies integrate with Conditional Access App Control, allowing adaptive enforcement based on device type, location, or risk. Detailed logs and reporting enable incident investigation and auditing, ensuring that any suspicious activity is tracked and remediated.

Other solutions do not provide equivalent real-time detection of behavioral anomalies. Conditional Access enforces access policies but does not monitor activity within sessions. Microsoft Information Protection classifies content but does not track user behavior. Defender for Endpoint protects devices but does not provide visibility into cloud application activity.

In practice, Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) allows organizations to monitor and control user activity across cloud applications in real time, providing proactive protection against insider threats and accidental or malicious data leaks. By continuously analyzing user behavior, file access patterns, and application usage, MCAS can detect anomalies that deviate from normal activity, such as unusually large downloads, access from unusual locations, or sharing sensitive files with external accounts. When such behavior is detected, MCAS can automatically enforce predefined policies to block, restrict, or alert on the activity, preventing potential data breaches before they occur.

MCAS also supports granular session controls and adaptive access policies, allowing organizations to maintain a balance between security and productivity. For example, users accessing corporate data from a trusted device or location may be allowed full functionality, while the same actions from unmanaged devices or high-risk locations could trigger read-only access, session monitoring, or additional verification steps. This ensures that security measures do not unnecessarily hinder legitimate work, supporting modern hybrid and remote work scenarios.

In addition to real-time enforcement, MCAS provides detailed auditing and reporting capabilities, giving administrators visibility into how sensitive information is accessed, shared, and modified. This helps organizations maintain compliance with regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, or ISO standards. Alerts generated by MCAS can be integrated with SIEM solutions or security dashboards to enable faster investigation and response to potential threats.

By proactively detecting risky behaviors, preventing unauthorized data access, and dynamically enforcing policies, MCAS empowers organizations to protect sensitive information across cloud environments. This approach reduces the risk of insider threats, supports regulatory compliance, and enables secure collaboration, all while allowing employees to work efficiently without unnecessary interruptions. In essence, MCAS provides a real-time, intelligent security layer that balances protection with operational flexibility, enhancing overall organizational resilience.

Question 63:

Your organization wants to automatically classify and protect documents containing social security numbers and prevent them from being shared externally. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to classify, label, and protect sensitive content, such as documents containing social security numbers (SSNs). By defining sensitive information types, MIP can automatically detect SSNs in emails, files, or SharePoint documents and apply predefined labels that enforce protection policies.

Once labeled, documents can be encrypted, restricted to authorized users, or blocked from being shared externally. For example, if a human resources employee attempts to email a file containing SSNs to an external partner, MIP automatically applies the sensitivity label, encrypts the document, and prevents external sharing.

Automation ensures consistent policy enforcement across Microsoft 365 applications, reducing reliance on manual actions and minimizing the risk of accidental leaks. Detailed audit logs track who accessed or attempted to share sensitive data, supporting compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and other privacy regulations.

Other solutions do not provide automated content classification and protection. Conditional Access enforces access policies but cannot classify data. MCAS monitors activity but does not automatically label or protect content. Defender for Office 365 protects against threats but does not enforce content-specific policies.

In practice, Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) ensures that sensitive personal data, such as Social Security numbers, financial records, or other personally identifiable information (PII), is consistently identified, classified, and protected across Microsoft 365 environments. By automatically detecting sensitive information based on predefined patterns, keywords, or custom policies, MIP can apply labels that enforce encryption, access restrictions, and rights management. These protections travel with the data, ensuring that it remains secure even when shared externally or downloaded to personal devices. This persistent protection reduces the risk of accidental exposure or intentional misuse, safeguarding both organizational assets and individual privacy.

MIP also integrates seamlessly with collaboration and productivity tools, including Outlook, Teams, SharePoint, and OneDrive. For example, if an employee attempts to send an email containing a customer’s Social Security number, MIP can automatically encrypt the message, restrict forwarding, and enforce viewing rights only for authorized recipients. Similarly, sensitive documents stored in SharePoint or OneDrive can be labeled and encrypted, ensuring that only users with the proper permissions can access, edit, or share the content. This not only mitigates the risk of data leakage but also supports secure collaboration across teams and departments.

Additionally, MIP provides auditing and reporting capabilities that enable security and compliance teams to monitor access to sensitive data and detect unusual behavior. Organizations can track who accessed or attempted to access protected documents, helping to identify potential policy violations or insider threats. These audit logs are valuable for demonstrating compliance with privacy and data protection regulations, such as GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA, and for supporting incident investigations when necessary.

By implementing MIP, organizations establish a proactive, automated approach to data protection. Policies are consistently applied, risks are minimized, and sensitive personal data remains secure throughout its lifecycle. This enables employees to collaborate effectively without compromising privacy, while compliance teams gain the tools needed to enforce regulatory requirements and maintain accountability. Overall, MIP enhances both security and operational efficiency by embedding protection directly into content rather than relying solely on perimeter defenses.

Question 64:

Your organization wants to detect high-risk sign-ins and automatically enforce MFA or block access to mitigate account compromise. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection provides organizations with the ability to detect risky sign-ins and compromised accounts using machine learning, anomaly detection, and threat intelligence. It evaluates signals such as unusual locations, impossible travel, unfamiliar devices, and leaked credentials to assign risk scores for both sign-ins and user accounts.

Administrators can configure sign-in risk policies to require MFA or block access for high-risk sign-ins and user risk policies to enforce password resets for compromised accounts. This automated remediation reduces the window in which attackers can exploit stolen credentials, while minimizing manual administrative overhead.

Integration with Conditional Access enables adaptive access policies. For example, users signing in from an unrecognized location may be challenged for MFA, whereas low-risk sign-ins from trusted devices proceed seamlessly. Detailed audit logs provide insights into detected risks, policy enforcement, and remediation, supporting compliance and security monitoring.

Other solutions do not offer risk-based adaptive access enforcement. MCAS monitors cloud activity but does not enforce MFA for risky sign-ins. MIP classifies content but does not manage sign-in risk. Defender for Office 365 protects against threats but does not remediate compromised accounts.

In practice, Azure AD Identity Protection helps organizations secure user identities by continuously monitoring sign-in activity and assessing potential risks in real time. By analyzing signals such as unusual locations, impossible travel scenarios, anonymous IP addresses, leaked credentials, and atypical device behavior, Identity Protection can determine whether a sign-in attempt is low, medium, or high risk. This allows administrators to take appropriate, automated actions to protect accounts before a compromise occurs. For example, if a user attempts to log in from a location inconsistent with their normal behavior, Identity Protection can automatically trigger a multi-factor authentication challenge or block access until the user’s identity is verified, reducing the likelihood of unauthorized access.

Identity Protection also integrates with Conditional Access to enforce adaptive authentication policies that balance security and usability. Low-risk sign-ins from trusted devices or known locations can proceed without interruption, while high-risk attempts trigger stronger controls. This ensures that security measures do not unnecessarily disrupt legitimate workflows, allowing users to access resources efficiently while sensitive applications remain protected. Administrators can define policies targeting specific groups, roles, or applications, enabling flexible risk management tailored to organizational requirements.

Additionally, Identity Protection provides robust reporting and auditing capabilities. Administrators can monitor risky sign-ins, view trends, track remediated accounts, and evaluate the effectiveness of risk policies over time. Integration with Microsoft 365 security tools and SIEM systems enables centralized alerting and rapid response to potential security incidents. Automated remediation options, such as password resets for compromised accounts, reduce administrative overhead and ensure timely mitigation of identity-based threats.

By leveraging Identity Protection, organizations can prevent account takeover, safeguard sensitive resources, and maintain compliance with security and privacy regulations. Its real-time risk detection, adaptive controls, and automated remediation enhance overall security posture while minimizing friction for users. This approach empowers organizations to proactively manage identity risks, protect critical data, and maintain a seamless and secure user experience across cloud and hybrid environments.

Question 65:

Your organization wants to simulate phishing attacks to assess employee security awareness and track improvements over time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Attack Simulator
B) Threat Explorer
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Information Protection

Answer: A) – Attack Simulator

Explanation:

Attack Simulator, part of Microsoft Defender for Office 365, allows organizations to run controlled phishing simulations to evaluate employee awareness, identify high-risk users, and deliver targeted training. It can simulate credential-harvesting emails, malicious attachments, and spoofed messages without compromising real systems.

Administrators can select users or groups, customize phishing scenarios, and track user interactions such as clicking links, submitting credentials, or opening attachments. Detailed reports identify users most susceptible to phishing, enabling targeted training interventions to improve security awareness.

Simulations can be repeated periodically to measure progress, evaluate training effectiveness, and track improvement in employee behavior. Integration with security awareness modules allows failed simulations to trigger immediate feedback and learning, reinforcing safe practices.

Other solutions do not provide phishing simulations. Threat Explorer investigates real email threats but does not simulate attacks. MCAS monitors cloud activity but does not test user awareness. MIP protects content but does not simulate phishing attacks.

In practice, Attack Simulator is essential for building a strong security culture, reducing human risk, and continuously improving employee response to phishing attempts, enhancing overall organizational cybersecurity posture.

Question 66:

Your organization wants to prevent access to Microsoft 365 apps from devices that are not compliant with corporate security policies. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Information Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access enables organizations to enforce adaptive access policies based on device compliance, user location, risk level, and other contextual signals. In this scenario, the organization’s goal is to prevent non-compliant devices from accessing Microsoft 365 applications. Compliance can be defined using Microsoft Endpoint Manager, checking for conditions like device enrollment, OS version, antivirus status, encryption, and baseline configurations.

Administrators can create Conditional Access policies that target specific users or groups, select Microsoft 365 cloud apps, and configure access controls requiring compliant devices. If a user attempts to access Teams, SharePoint, or OneDrive from a non-compliant device, access is blocked or conditional actions are triggered, such as enrollment prompts or restricted access.

Conditional Access allows granular, risk-based enforcement. Policies can combine multiple conditions—device state, network location, and sign-in risk—to provide context-aware security while minimizing disruption for trusted users. Audit logs provide detailed visibility into blocked access attempts, enabling incident tracking and compliance reporting.

Other solutions are insufficient for this purpose. Microsoft Information Protection classifies and protects content but does not enforce device compliance. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors user activity but cannot block access based on device compliance. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not control cloud app access dynamically.

In practice, Conditional Access ensures that only trusted, compliant devices can access corporate resources, protecting sensitive information from potential threats while maintaining a balance between security and productivity.

Question 67:

Your organization wants to monitor and control the sharing of sensitive documents in Microsoft 365, ensuring files are not downloaded to unmanaged devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access App Control
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Conditional Access App Control

Explanation:

Conditional Access App Control, integrated with Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS), provides real-time session-level monitoring and enforcement for cloud applications. It enables administrators to define policies that prevent risky actions such as downloading, copying, or sharing sensitive content from unmanaged devices.

When a user accesses SharePoint, OneDrive, or Teams, their session can be routed through MCAS. Policies can then block risky downloads, restrict copy-paste, or prevent sharing based on device compliance, location, or user risk. For example, a user attempting to download a financial report to a personal laptop can be blocked, while the same action from a corporate-managed device is allowed.

MCAS uses machine learning-based anomaly detection to identify unusual activity, such as bulk downloads, off-hours access, or excessive sharing. Alerts can notify security teams, and automated actions can remediate potential threats. Detailed activity logs also support auditing and compliance reporting.

Other solutions do not provide session-level enforcement. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces sign-in policies but cannot control actions during a session. Microsoft Information Protection protects content through labeling and encryption, but does not block actions in real time. Defender for Office 365 secures email and endpoints, but does not control user activity in cloud apps.

In practice, Conditional Access App Control provides dynamic protection of sensitive data, mitigating insider threats and accidental leaks, while maintaining productivity for trusted users and compliant devices.

Question 68:

Your organization wants to detect risky sign-ins and enforce adaptive authentication, such as MFA or access blocking, when unusual activity is detected. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection helps organizations detect and respond to risky sign-ins and potentially compromised accounts by analyzing a variety of signals, including anomalous locations, impossible travel, unfamiliar devices, and leaked credentials. Each sign-in and user account receives a risk score, which determines the severity and required remediation actions.

Administrators can define sign-in risk policies to require MFA or block access for high-risk sign-ins, and user risk policies to trigger password resets for accounts showing elevated risk. Integration with Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce adaptive access based on risk, ensuring legitimate users are minimally impacted while preventing unauthorized access.

For example, a user attempting to sign in from an unusual country might be challenged with MFA or blocked entirely until verified, whereas normal sign-ins proceed seamlessly. Detailed audit logs track risk events and policy enforcement, enabling security teams to investigate incidents and maintain compliance.

Other solutions do not provide automated, risk-based enforcement. MCAS monitors user activity but cannot enforce MFA for risky sign-ins. MIP protects content but does not manage sign-in risk. Defender for Office 365 protects against threats but does not remediate compromised accounts.

In practice, Identity Protection ensures continuous monitoring, proactive mitigation, and adaptive security enforcement, reducing the risk of account compromise and protecting sensitive organizational resources.

Question 69:

Your organization wants to classify sensitive healthcare documents and prevent external sharing while maintaining access for internal authorized users. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to automatically classify and protect sensitive content, such as personal health information (PHI). Predefined sensitive information types, or custom policies, allow administrators to identify healthcare-related data across Microsoft 365 apps.

Once PHI is detected, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict access to authorized users, prevent external sharing, and generate audit logs. For instance, if a healthcare professional uploads a patient record to SharePoint and attempts to share it externally, MIP automatically enforces protection to prevent data leakage.

Automation ensures consistent policy enforcement without relying on user intervention, reducing the risk of accidental or malicious exposure. Detailed audit logs provide insights into access attempts, sharing activity, and policy enforcement, which support compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and internal regulations.

Other solutions do not offer automated content-based enforcement. Conditional Access controls access but does not classify content. MCAS monitors activity but does not automatically label or restrict sensitive data. Defender for Office 365 secures devices but does not enforce content-level policies.

In practice, MIP ensures consistent protection of healthcare information, mitigates insider or external threats, supports regulatory compliance, and maintains productivity for authorized users.

Question 70:

Your organization wants to simulate phishing attacks to assess employee awareness and improve security behavior over time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Attack Simulator
B) Threat Explorer
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Information Protection

Answer: A) – Attack Simulator

Explanation:

Attack Simulator, part of Microsoft Defender for Office 365, allows organizations to run controlled phishing simulations to assess employee awareness, identify high-risk users, and deliver targeted training. It simulates realistic phishing scenarios such as credential-harvesting emails, malicious attachments, and spoofed messages without affecting actual systems.

Administrators can select users or groups, customize messages, and track interactions such as clicks on malicious links or credential submissions. Detailed reports highlight users most at risk, enabling targeted security awareness training to reduce human error.

Simulated attacks can be repeated periodically to measure improvements in behavior over time. Integration with training modules ensures immediate feedback for users who fail simulations, reinforcing safe practices.

Other solutions do not simulate phishing attacks. Threat Explorer investigates real threats but does not simulate attacks. MCAS monitors cloud activity but does not test awareness. MIP protects content but does not simulate phishing attacks.

In practice, Attack Simulator helps organizations strengthen security culture, reduce human-related risk, and continuously reinforce best practices, improving overall cybersecurity resilience.

Question 71:

Your organization wants to prevent users from downloading sensitive financial reports from SharePoint when using unmanaged devices, but allow downloads from corporate-managed devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access App Control
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Conditional Access App Control

Explanation:

Conditional Access App Control, integrated with Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS), provides real-time, session-level monitoring and enforcement for cloud applications, including SharePoint and OneDrive. This solution allows organizations to define policies that prevent risky actions such as downloading, copying, or sharing sensitive content from unmanaged devices.

In this scenario, the organization wants to allow downloads only from corporate-managed devices. When a user accesses SharePoint from an unmanaged device, MCAS can detect the session context and block the download action, while downloads from compliant, corporate-managed devices proceed normally. This ensures sensitive financial reports are protected without restricting legitimate internal access.

MCAS uses machine learning and anomaly detection to identify unusual patterns, such as excessive downloads, off-hours activity, or bulk sharing. Alerts notify security teams, and automated remediation actions mitigate potential threats. Detailed activity logs support auditing and compliance reporting, providing visibility into user actions and policy enforcement.

Other solutions do not provide session-level enforcement. Azure AD Conditional Access controls access at sign-in but cannot block actions during an active session. Microsoft Information Protection can label and encrypt content, but does not dynamically restrict downloads based on device type. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not control cloud app session activity.

In practice, Conditional Access App Control ensures dynamic protection of sensitive content, reducing insider threats and preventing accidental data leakage while maintaining productivity for authorized users and compliant devices.

Question 72:

Your organization wants to classify emails containing social security numbers and prevent them from being sent externally. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to automatically classify and protect sensitive content, including personally identifiable information (PII) like social security numbers (SSNs). By defining sensitive information types, administrators can detect SSNs in emails, attachments, or documents and apply policies that prevent unauthorized sharing.

Once identified, emails containing SSNs can be automatically labeled with a sensitivity label that enforces encryption and external sharing restrictions. For example, if a human resources employee attempts to email a payroll spreadsheet containing SSNs to an external recipient, MIP automatically applies the protection, preventing the email from leaving the organization.

Automation ensures consistent enforcement across Microsoft 365 apps and reduces reliance on manual user actions, minimizing the risk of accidental or intentional data leaks. Detailed audit logs provide insights into access attempts, sharing events, and policy enforcement, supporting regulatory compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, and internal policies.

Other solutions are insufficient for content-based protection. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access controls but does not classify or protect content. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors activity but does not automatically label emails. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 protects against phishing and malware, but does not prevent sharing based on content.

In practice, MIP ensures automatic, consistent protection of sensitive PII, safeguarding personal data, maintaining compliance, and allowing legitimate workflows without compromising security.

Question 73:

Your organization wants to monitor for unusual user behavior in Microsoft 365 apps, such as excessive file downloads or abnormal sharing activity. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Cloud App Security

Explanation:

Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides behavioral monitoring and anomaly detection for Microsoft 365 and other cloud applications. By establishing baseline activity profiles for users, MCAS can identify suspicious actions, including unusual file downloads, excessive sharing, or access from atypical locations.

Once abnormal behavior is detected, administrators can define automated responses, such as blocking activity, alerting security teams, restricting downloads, or quarantining files. For example, if a user downloads hundreds of sensitive financial files outside of normal working hours, MCAS can immediately block further downloads and trigger an alert for investigation.

Session policies integrate with Conditional Access App Control, allowing real-time enforcement based on device, location, or user risk. Detailed logs support incident investigations and compliance reporting, ensuring administrators can track and remediate potential insider threats or compromised accounts.

Other solutions do not provide the same monitoring capabilities. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies but does not monitor ongoing user activity. Microsoft Information Protection classifies content but does not detect abnormal behavior. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not monitor cloud application actions in real time.

In practice, MCAS enables organizations to proactively detect risky behavior, prevent data exfiltration, and maintain a balance between security and productivity, ensuring sensitive content remains protected.

Question 74:

Your organization wants to detect compromised accounts and enforce adaptive authentication policies,,s such as MFA or blocking sign-ins based on risk. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection provides organizations with the ability to detect risky sign-ins and compromised accounts using machine learning, anomaly detection, and threat intelligence. Risk factors include unusual geographic locations, impossible travel, unfamiliar devices, and leaked credentials. Each sign-in and user account receives a risk score, determining the severity and appropriate remediation.

Administrators can configure sign-in risk policies to require MFA or block access for high-risk sign-ins, and user risk policies to trigger password resets for compromised accounts. Integration with Conditional Access allows adaptive enforcement, ensuring legitimate users are minimally impacted while preventing unauthorized access.

For example, if a user signs in from an unrecognized country, Identity Protection can enforce MFA or block access entirely until the account is verified. Detailed audit logs track risk events, policy enforcement, and remediation actions, supporting incident response and compliance.

Other solutions do not provide automated risk-based access control. MCAS monitors activity but cannot enforce MFA for risky sign-ins. MIP protects content but does not manage account risk. Defender for Office 365 protects against malware and phishing, but does not remediate compromised accounts.

In practice, Identity Protection ensures continuous monitoring and proactive mitigation, reducing the risk of account compromise while maintaining usability for legitimate users.

Question 75:

Your organization wants to simulate phishing attacks to train employees and improve security awareness over time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Attack Simulator
B) Threat Explorer
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Information Protection

Answer: A) – Attack Simulator

Explanation:

Attack Simulator, part of Microsoft Defender for Office 365, enables organizations to run controlled phishing simulations to assess employee awareness, identify high-risk users, and provide targeted security training. It can simulate phishing scenarios such as credential-harvesting emails, malicious attachments, and spoofed messages without compromising real systems.

Administrators can select specific users or groups, customize simulation messages, and track interactions such as clicks on links, credential submissions, or opening attachments. Reports identify the most susceptible users, allowing organizations to deliver targeted awareness training to reduce human error.

Repeated simulations help measure improvements over time, evaluate training effectiveness, and reinforce safe security behavior. Integration with training modules ensures employees who fail simulations receive immediate feedback and corrective guidance.

Other solutions do not provide phishing simulations. Threat Explorer investigates real email threats but does not simulate attacks. MCAS monitors cloud activity but does not test employee awareness. MIP protects content but does not simulate phishing.

In practice, Attack Simulator strengthens security culture, reduces human-related risk, and continuously improves employee cybersecurity awareness, protecting the organization against phishing and social engineering threats.

Question 76:

Your organization wants to require MFA for users accessing Teams from unmanaged personal devices while allowing seamless access from corporate-managed devices. Which solution should you implement?
A) Azure AD Conditional Access
B) Microsoft Information Protection
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Security Defaults

Answer: A) – Azure AD Conditional Access

Explanation:

Azure AD Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce adaptive, context-aware authentication policies based on device compliance, location, user group, and risk level. In this scenario, the organization’s objective is to enforce MFA for users on unmanaged personal devices while allowing corporate-managed devices to access Teams seamlessly.

Administrators can create a Conditional Access policy targeting Teams, configure conditions to detect device compliance via Microsoft Endpoint Manager, and apply the “require MFA” control only to devices that are noncompliant or unmanaged. This approach ensures that external devices are challenged for MFA, reducing the risk of unauthorized access while maintaining usability for trusted corporate devices.

Conditional Access policies can also include location-based conditions, restricting access from untrusted IP ranges or specific geographic regions. Integration with Azure AD Identity Protection allows risk-based enforcement, such as requiring MFA for sign-ins flagged as suspicious. Detailed reporting provides audit logs and insights into policy enforcement, helping security teams track and mitigate potential threats.

Other solutions do not provide this level of adaptive control. Microsoft Information Protection classifies and protects content, but does not enforce MFA. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors sessions but does not enforce sign-in policies. Security Defaults enforce MFA universally without differentiation between managed and unmanaged devices, which could reduce productivity.

In practice, Conditional Access ensures risk-based MFA enforcement, protecting Teams and other Microsoft 365 applications from external threats while maintaining seamless access for trusted corporate devices, balancing security and productivity.

Question 77:

Your organization wants to prevent sensitive documents containing credit card information from being shared externally while maintaining internal access. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Information Protection
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Microsoft Information Protection

Explanation:

Microsoft Information Protection (MIP) enables organizations to automatically detect, classify, and protect sensitive content such as credit card information. By creating or using predefined sensitive information types, MIP can scan emails, documents, and SharePoint content to identify credit card numbers.

Once identified, MIP applies sensitivity labels that enforce encryption, restrict access, and prevent external sharing. For instance, if a finance employee attempts to share a spreadsheet containing credit card data with an external vendor, MIP automatically applies a label, encrypts the file, and restricts access to authorized internal users.

Automation ensures consistent policy enforcement across Microsoft 365 apps without relying on user action, reducing accidental data leaks and enhancing compliance with standards such as PCI DSS. Audit logs track access attempts, sharing events, and policy enforcement, enabling security teams to maintain oversight and meet regulatory requirements.

Other solutions are insufficient for content-based protection. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces access policies but does not classify content. Microsoft Cloud App Security monitors activity but does not automatically label or prevent sharing based on content. Defender for Office 365 protects endpoints and email, but does not provide content-specific classification and protection.

In practice, MIP ensures robust protection of sensitive financial data, preventing unauthorized sharing while maintaining internal access for legitimate users, balancing security and productivity.

Question 78:

Your organization wants to detect anomalous user behavior, such as mass file downloads or suspicious sharing, and respond in real time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Microsoft Cloud App Security
B) Azure AD Conditional Access
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Endpoint

Answer: A) – Microsoft Cloud App Security

Explanation:

Microsoft Cloud App Security (MCAS) provides behavioral monitoring and anomaly detection across Microsoft 365 and other cloud applications. By establishing baseline activity profiles, MCAS identifies deviations such as unusual file downloads, bulk sharing, or access from atypical locations.

When suspicious activity is detected, administrators can define automated responses, including blocking downloads, alerting security teams, restricting access, or quarantining files. For example, if a user downloads hundreds of sensitive documents outside of business hours, MCAS can immediately block additional downloads and notify administrators for investigation.

Session policies integrated with Conditional Access App Control allow real-time enforcement based on user, device, or location context. Detailed logs enable auditing and compliance reporting, providing visibility into anomalous activity and mitigation actions taken.

Other solutions lack this level of real-time monitoring. Azure AD Conditional Access enforces sign-in policies but does not monitor session activity. Microsoft Information Protection classifies content but does not detect unusual behavior. Defender for Endpoint secures devices but does not monitor user activity in cloud applications.

In practice, MCAS ensures proactive detection and mitigation of insider threats, protecting sensitive content while maintaining legitimate workflows for trusted users and devices.

Question 79:

Your organization wants to detect risky sign-ins and automatically enforce MFA or block access for compromised accounts. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Identity Protection
B) Microsoft Cloud App Security
C) Microsoft Information Protection
D) Microsoft Defender for Office 365

Answer: A) – Azure AD Identity Protection

Explanation:

Azure AD Identity Protection enables organizations to detect risky sign-ins and compromised accounts using machine learning, anomaly detection, and threat intelligence. Risk indicators include unusual sign-in locations, impossible travel, unfamiliar devices, and leaked credentials. Each sign-in and user account receives a risk score, which determines the required remediation action.

Administrators can configure sign-in risk policies to enforce MFA or block high-risk sign-ins, and user risk policies to require password resets for compromised accounts. Integration with Conditional Access allows adaptive enforcement, ensuring legitimate users have minimal disruption while unauthorized access attempts are blocked.

For example, a sign-in from an unrecognized geographic region may trigger MFA or block access, whereas sign-ins from trusted devices proceed seamlessly. Detailed audit logs provide visibility into risk events, enforcement, and remediation actions for compliance and incident investigation.

Other solutions do not provide automated, risk-based enforcement. MCAS monitors activity but cannot enforce MFA for risky sign-ins. MIP classifies content but does not manage account risk. Defender for Office 365 protects against threats but does not remediate compromised accounts.

In practice, Identity Protection ensures continuous monitoring, proactive mitigation, and adaptive security enforcement, reducing the likelihood of account compromise while maintaining usability for legitimate users.

Question 80:

Your organization wants to run controlled phishing simulations to evaluate employee security awareness and track improvements over time. Which solution should you implement?

A) Attack Simulator
B) Threat Explorer
C) Microsoft Cloud App Security
D) Microsoft Information Protection

Answer: A) – Attack Simulator

Explanation:

Attack Simulator, part of Microsoft Defender for Office 365, allows organizations to run controlled phishing simulations to assess employee awareness, identify high-risk users, and provide targeted security training. It simulates phishing scenarios such as credential-harvesting emails, malicious attachments, and spoofed messages without affecting real systems.

Administrators can select specific users or groups, customize phishing messages, and track interactions such as clicks on malicious links or credential submissions. Reports identify users most at risk, enabling organizations to deliver targeted security awareness training and reduce susceptibility to phishing attacks.

Simulated attacks can be repeated periodically to measure improvements, evaluate training effectiveness, and reinforce safe behavior. Integration with learning modules ensures immediate feedback for employees who fail simulations, helping strengthen the security culture.

Other solutions do not provide phishing simulations. Threat Explorer investigates real threats but does not simulate attacks. MCAS monitors activity but does not assess user awareness. MIP protects content but does not simulate phishing attacks.

In practice, Attack Simulator ensures proactive, ongoing employee security awareness, reducing human-related risks and improving overall cybersecurity resilience for the organization.