Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional SAP-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q141-160

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional SAP-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 141:

A company wants to implement a highly available, fault-tolerant multi-region relational database for a global SaaS application with minimal replication lag. Which AWS solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) Amazon Aurora Global Database
B) RDS cross-region snapshots
C) EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication
D) Standby RDS in a single region

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Amazon Aurora Global Database.

Amazon Aurora Global Database is specifically designed for high-availability, low-latency, multi-region deployments. It allows the creation of a primary database cluster in one region and multiple read-only secondary clusters in other regions. The replication lag between regions is typically less than one second, which ensures that global users can read nearly real-time data locally while write operations are centralized to the primary region.

Aurora automatically replicates data across multiple Availability Zones within each region, providing high durability and fault tolerance. In the event of a regional outage, a secondary region can be promoted to primary, enabling fast disaster recovery with low Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO) targets.

Option B, RDS cross-region snapshots, is suitable for backups but does not provide continuous replication or real-time failover. Option C, EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication, introduces significant operational complexity, higher risk of human error, and requires constant monitoring and patching. Option D, standby RDS in a single region, provides high availability only within a single region and does not protect against regional disasters.

Security measures include IAM roles for access control, KMS encryption for data at rest, and TLS encryption for in-transit data. CloudTrail logs all administrative actions for auditing and compliance purposes. CloudWatch monitors replication lag, CPU utilization, query performance, and instance health.

Operational benefits include reduced administrative overhead, automated failover, and multi-region read scalability. Aurora Global Database also supports read-intensive workloads by offloading queries to secondary regions, enhancing performance and reducing latency for global users.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this scenario demonstrates best practices for multi-region relational database deployment, highlighting reliability, performance efficiency, operational excellence, cost optimization, and security. It also shows how AWS enables disaster recovery planning, low-latency global access, and high-availability design for SaaS applications.

Future integration possibilities include using Route 53 latency-based routing to direct users to the nearest read replica, CloudFront for caching application content, and Lambda for automated database monitoring and failover orchestration. Cost optimization is achieved by paying only for storage and compute resources consumed and leveraging the managed Aurora features to reduce administrative overhead.

Overall, Aurora Global Database provides a robust, scalable, secure, and low-latency solution for global relational workloads, perfectly aligned with SAP-C02 exam best practices.

Question 142:

A company wants a serverless, real-time analytics pipeline to process IoT telemetry data with minimal operational overhead. Which solution is best?

Answer:

A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB
B) SQS with EC2 consumers
C) SNS with S3 triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB.

AWS IoT Core provides a highly scalable ingestion layer for IoT devices. Devices can connect using MQTT, HTTPS, or WebSockets, and authentication is enforced using X.509 certificates, IAM policies, or custom authorizers. This ensures only authorized devices can publish messages, improving security and reliability.

Lambda functions are triggered in real-time when IoT messages are received. Lambda provides a serverless compute layer that scales automatically with incoming message volume. Functions can perform transformations, aggregations, enrichments, or filtering before persisting data. This serverless architecture eliminates the operational overhead of managing compute infrastructure.

DynamoDB stores processed IoT data in a low-latency, highly available NoSQL database. DynamoDB Streams can trigger additional Lambda functions for downstream analytics, real-time dashboards, or alerting mechanisms. Multi-AZ replication ensures durability and reliability.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, introduces operational complexity due to instance management and manual scaling. Option C, SNS with S3 triggers, is asynchronous and not optimized for real-time analytics. Option D, RDS batch processing, introduces latency and requires capacity management.

Security best practices include using IAM roles for least-privilege access, KMS for encryption at rest, and TLS for in-transit encryption. CloudTrail provides auditing capabilities. CloudWatch monitors ingestion rates, Lambda executions, and DynamoDB throughput. Alerts can notify administrators about anomalies.

Operationally, this architecture scales automatically, maintains low latency, ensures durability, and minimizes manual operational tasks. Cost optimization is achieved through pay-per-use billing for Lambda and DynamoDB.

From an SAP-C02 exam perspective, this architecture demonstrates best practices for real-time, serverless IoT analytics pipelines, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, security, performance efficiency, and cost optimization.

Integration with additional services, such as Kinesis Data Firehose for streaming analytics or Timestream for time-series data, can further enhance functionality. Predictive analytics and anomaly detection can be implemented using Amazon SageMaker.

Overall, AWS IoT Core, Lambda, and DynamoDB provide a fully managed, scalable, secure, and cost-efficient solution for real-time IoT analytics workloads, aligning with SAP-C02 exam best practices.

Question 143:

A company wants to reduce read latency for a globally distributed DynamoDB application with high traffic. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching layer for DynamoDB that reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds. It operates as a write-through cache, ensuring data consistency with the underlying DynamoDB table. This capability is critical for applications requiring low-latency access to frequently read data, such as e-commerce catalogs, leaderboards, or IoT dashboards.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) is a general-purpose caching solution but requires application-level integration to maintain consistency with DynamoDB, increasing operational complexity. RDS Read Replicas (option C) are designed for relational databases and cannot accelerate NoSQL queries. S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) optimizes object transfers to S3, not database queries.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployments with automatic failover, ensuring high availability. CloudWatch metrics provide visibility into cache hit ratios, node health, and latency. Security is maintained using IAM roles, KMS encryption for data at rest, and TLS for in-transit encryption.

Operationally, DAX reduces read pressure on DynamoDB, preventing throttling and improving performance predictability. This allows applications to handle high traffic without impacting user experience. Cost optimization is achieved through reduced DynamoDB read capacity usage and pay-as-you-go pricing for DAX nodes.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, DAX demonstrates performance efficiency, reliability, operational simplicity, and scalability. It is a best practice for globally distributed, high-traffic NoSQL workloads.

Applications can further integrate monitoring and alerting using CloudWatch and X-Ray for end-to-end visibility. This architecture provides a scalable, low-latency, secure solution aligned with modern cloud-native principles.

Question 144:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which service is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions is a serverless orchestration service that enables complex workflows with sequential or parallel tasks, conditional branching, retries, and error handling. It integrates with Lambda, ECS, SNS, and other AWS services, allowing developers to build scalable, resilient serverless applications without managing infrastructure.

SWF (option B) is legacy and requires manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is for batch workloads, not event-driven workflows. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service without orchestration capabilities.

Step Functions provides a visual workflow editor for designing state machines. CloudWatch monitors execution metrics and error rates, and X-Ray traces workflow execution for debugging. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access, and KMS encrypts sensitive workflow data.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces human intervention, increases reliability, and ensures proper error handling. Costs are minimized due to its serverless pay-per-transition billing.

For SAP-C02 exam scenarios, this demonstrates best practices for serverless workflow orchestration, emphasizing reliability, scalability, operational efficiency, security, and cost optimization.

Question 145:

A company wants a serverless, cost-efficient pipeline to process S3 log files in real time for analytics. Which solution is best?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 triggers invoke Lambda functions when new log files arrive. Lambda can transform, filter, or enrich logs before they are queried. Athena provides serverless SQL querying directly on S3 objects, allowing analytics without provisioning infrastructure.

EC2 Auto Scaling (option B) increases operational complexity and requires manual scaling and patching. RDS batch ingestion (option C) introduces latency and requires capacity management. SNS to EC2 (option D) is not suitable for high-throughput real-time analytics.

Security is enforced via IAM roles, KMS, and TLS. CloudWatch monitors Lambda execution, S3 events, and query metrics. CloudTrail ensures auditing.

Operational simplicity, scalability, durability, and cost optimization are achieved by leveraging serverless services. SAP-C02 exam best practices emphasize serverless, event-driven analytics pipelines for operational efficiency, reliability, and cost-effectiveness.

Question 146:

A company wants to implement a globally distributed web application with low latency and high availability. Which architecture is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) Multi-region ALBs, CloudFront, and Route 53 latency-based routing
B) Single-region ALB with EC2 Auto Scaling
C) Global Accelerator with single-region EC2
D) S3 static hosting with Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Multi-region ALBs, CloudFront, and Route 53 latency-based routing.

This architecture ensures low latency and high availability for a global user base. Multi-region Application Load Balancers (ALBs) distribute traffic across multiple Availability Zones within each region, ensuring high availability and resilience to individual AZ failures. CloudFront acts as a global content delivery network (CDN), caching static and dynamic content at edge locations close to users, significantly reducing latency.

Route 53 latency-based routing directs users to the nearest healthy region, improving response times and enabling automatic failover in case of regional outages. Health checks in Route 53 monitor application endpoints, ensuring that traffic is directed only to functioning regions.

Option B, a single-region ALB with EC2 Auto Scaling, does not provide global failover and has a single point of failure. Option C, Global Accelerator with single-region EC2, improves network performance but does not mitigate regional outages. Option D, S3 static hosting with Transfer Acceleration, is suitable only for static content and cannot handle dynamic workloads.

Security is enforced with IAM roles, TLS encryption, AWS WAF, and AWS Shield for DDoS protection. CloudTrail logs all administrative actions, providing auditing and compliance. CloudWatch monitors ALB request metrics, CloudFront cache hits/misses, and Route 53 health status, with alarms configured for performance or availability issues.

Operationally, this architecture is highly scalable because ALBs, CloudFront, and Lambda functions (if used) automatically adjust to traffic demands. It reduces operational overhead since the underlying services are fully managed. Cost optimization arises from using CloudFront caching to reduce origin load and pay-per-use scaling for ALBs and Lambda.

From an SAP-C02 exam perspective, this demonstrates best practices for designing globally distributed, highly available web applications, highlighting operational excellence, performance efficiency, reliability, security, and cost optimization.

Question 147:

A company wants a serverless, real-time pipeline for processing IoT sensor data with durability, low latency, and minimal operational overhead. Which solution is best?

Answer:

A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB
B) SQS with EC2 consumers
C) SNS with S3 triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB.

AWS IoT Core provides a scalable, fully managed ingestion layer for millions of IoT devices. It supports MQTT, HTTPS, and WebSocket protocols, and authentication is enforced using X.509 certificates, IAM policies, or custom authorizers. This ensures secure, authorized device access.

Lambda functions process messages in real-time, providing automatic scaling according to message volume. This serverless architecture eliminates the need to provision, patch, or scale servers manually. Lambda can enrich, filter, or transform messages before storing them in DynamoDB.

DynamoDB serves as a durable, low-latency NoSQL database. Multi-AZ replication ensures high availability, while DynamoDB Streams can trigger additional Lambda functions for downstream analytics, alerting, or dashboards.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, introduces operational overhead and requires manual scaling. Option C, SNS with S3 triggers, is asynchronous and not optimized for high-throughput real-time processing. Option D, RDS batch processing, adds latency and requires capacity planning.

Security measures include IAM roles, KMS encryption for DynamoDB, and TLS for in-transit data. CloudTrail enables auditing, and CloudWatch monitors ingestion rates, Lambda execution metrics, and DynamoDB throughput. Alerts can detect failures or abnormal patterns.

Operationally, this architecture scales automatically, maintains low latency, ensures durability, and minimizes manual intervention. Cost optimization is achieved through serverless pay-per-use billing.

For SAP-C02, this illustrates real-time IoT analytics best practices, emphasizing scalability, operational efficiency, durability, security, and cost optimization. Integration with Kinesis Data Firehose, Timestream, or SageMaker can further enhance analytics and predictive capabilities.

Question 148:

A company wants to accelerate read performance for a globally distributed, high-traffic DynamoDB table while maintaining strong consistency. Which solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching service for DynamoDB that reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds. It operates as a write-through cache, maintaining consistency with the underlying DynamoDB table. This makes it ideal for applications requiring low-latency access to frequently read data, such as e-commerce catalogs, gaming leaderboards, or IoT dashboards.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) provides caching but requires application-level logic to maintain consistency with DynamoDB, increasing operational complexity. RDS Read Replicas (option C) are for relational databases and cannot accelerate NoSQL workloads. S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) only improves object transfer speeds to S3 and does not affect database queries.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployments with automatic failover. CloudWatch metrics provide visibility into cache hit ratios, node health, and latency. Security is ensured with IAM roles, KMS encryption at rest, and TLS in transit.

Operationally, DAX reduces read load on DynamoDB, prevents throttling, and ensures predictable latency during traffic spikes. Cost optimization arises from reduced DynamoDB read capacity usage and pay-as-you-go pricing for DAX nodes.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, DAX illustrates performance efficiency, operational simplicity, reliability, and scalability. It is considered a best practice for globally distributed, high-traffic applications with low-latency requirements.

Question 149:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless Lambda functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions is a serverless orchestration service that allows complex workflows with sequential or parallel tasks, conditional branching, retries, and error handling. It integrates seamlessly with Lambda, ECS, SNS, SQS, and other AWS services, enabling developers to build resilient serverless applications without managing infrastructure.

Amazon SWF (option B) is a legacy orchestration service that requires manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is designed for batch processing and is not suitable for event-driven workflows. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service and cannot handle orchestration, retries, or conditional logic.

Step Functions provides a visual workflow designer, enabling easy tracking of state transitions and error handling. CloudWatch monitors workflow metrics, and X-Ray provides end-to-end tracing for debugging. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access, and KMS ensures data security for workflow inputs.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces human intervention, ensures workflow reliability, and provides automatic retries and error handling, minimizing operational overhead. Costs are reduced since Step Functions is serverless and billed per state transition.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, Step Functions represents best practices for serverless orchestration, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, scalability, security, and cost optimization. It allows complex workflows to run automatically without provisioning infrastructure, ensuring robust event-driven solutions.

Question 150:

A company wants a cost-efficient, serverless pipeline to process log files stored in S3 in real time for analytics. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 can trigger Lambda functions automatically when new log files are uploaded. Lambda functions process, transform, filter, or enrich the log files in real time. Athena allows serverless SQL querying directly on S3 objects, enabling analytics without provisioning servers or databases.

EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts (option B) introduces operational overhead and requires manual management. RDS batch ingestion (option C) introduces latency and capacity management challenges. SNS to EC2 (option D) is asynchronous and not suitable for real-time analytics at scale.

Security measures include IAM roles for least-privilege access, KMS encryption for S3 and Lambda, and TLS for data in transit. CloudTrail provides auditing, while CloudWatch monitors Lambda execution, S3 events, and Athena query performance. Alerts can be configured for failures or abnormal metrics.

Operationally, this architecture is fully serverless, scalable, and cost-efficient. Lambda and Athena scale automatically with incoming log volume, while pay-per-use pricing ensures cost optimization.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this demonstrates best practices for serverless analytics pipelines, highlighting operational efficiency, durability, scalability, security, and cost optimization. The architecture can be extended with visualization tools like QuickSight or downstream analytics workflows using Glue, EMR, or SageMaker for machine learning.

Question 151:

A company wants a globally distributed, low-latency relational database for a SaaS application with disaster recovery capabilities. Which AWS solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) Amazon Aurora Global Database
B) RDS cross-region snapshots
C) EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication
D) Standby RDS in a single region

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Amazon Aurora Global Database.

Amazon Aurora Global Database is designed for highly available, multi-region relational workloads. It enables the creation of a primary database cluster in one region and read-only secondary clusters in multiple other regions. Replication across regions typically experiences less than one second of lag, ensuring near real-time consistency for global users. This is essential for SaaS applications where users across different continents need up-to-date transactional data.

Aurora Global Database supports automatic failover, allowing a secondary cluster in another region to be promoted to primary in the event of a regional outage. This ensures low Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO), critical for business continuity. Within each region, Aurora replicates data across multiple Availability Zones for high durability and resilience.

Option B, RDS cross-region snapshots, provides a point-in-time backup mechanism but does not allow for continuous replication or near-real-time failover. Restoring a snapshot is time-consuming and increases RTO. Option C, EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication, introduces operational complexity, higher risk of human error, and requires constant monitoring and patching. Option D, standby RDS in a single region, only provides intra-region high availability and cannot protect against a full regional outage.

Security measures are robust. IAM roles manage access to the database, KMS encryption secures data at rest, and TLS ensures data in transit is encrypted. CloudTrail logs all administrative actions for auditing, while CloudWatch monitors replication lag, CPU utilization, storage consumption, and query performance. Alerts can be configured for anomalies or replication issues.

Operationally, Aurora Global Database reduces administrative overhead. It supports read scaling by offloading read queries to secondary regions, improving performance and reducing latency for global users. Automatic storage scaling eliminates manual intervention for capacity management. Additionally, Aurora Serverless can be deployed to dynamically adjust compute capacity based on workload, providing further cost optimization.

For SAP-C02 exam scenarios, this demonstrates best practices for multi-region relational database deployment, emphasizing reliability, performance efficiency, operational excellence, cost optimization, and security. Integration with Route 53 latency-based routing can direct users to the nearest read-only cluster, while CloudFront can cache frequently accessed content for even lower latency.

Aurora Global Database is ideal for SaaS applications requiring continuous global availability, minimal latency, and robust disaster recovery. By leveraging a fully managed, serverless-capable relational database solution, organizations can focus on application logic rather than managing complex replication and failover systems. This aligns perfectly with SAP-C02 principles of designing resilient, high-performance, secure, and cost-effective architectures.

Question 152:

A company wants a serverless, real-time analytics pipeline for IoT telemetry data with minimal operational overhead. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB
B) SQS with EC2 consumers
C) SNS with S3 triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB.

AWS IoT Core provides a fully managed, highly scalable ingestion layer for millions of IoT devices. Devices can publish messages using MQTT, HTTPS, or WebSocket protocols. Authentication is enforced through X.509 certificates, IAM policies, or custom authorizers, ensuring secure communication between devices and AWS services.

Lambda functions act as the compute layer, automatically triggered when IoT messages arrive. Lambda scales dynamically based on the incoming message volume, eliminating the need for server provisioning or manual scaling. Functions can perform real-time transformations, aggregations, filtering, or enrichment before storing the data in a backend system.

DynamoDB is the durable, low-latency NoSQL storage for processed IoT data. Multi-AZ replication ensures high availability and resilience, while DynamoDB Streams allow additional processing or analytics downstream.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, introduces operational complexity, requiring instance management, scaling, and patching. Option C, SNS with S3 triggers, is asynchronous and less suitable for high-throughput, low-latency IoT processing. Option D, RDS batch processing, introduces significant latency and requires capacity management.

Security is ensured via IAM roles with least-privilege access, KMS encryption at rest, and TLS encryption in transit. CloudTrail captures all administrative actions for auditing purposes, while CloudWatch monitors ingestion rates, Lambda executions, and DynamoDB throughput. Alerts can be configured for anomalies, ensuring proactive operational management.

Operationally, this architecture scales automatically with IoT data volume, maintains low latency, ensures durability, and minimizes manual intervention. Cost optimization comes from pay-per-use billing for Lambda and DynamoDB, with no idle resources.

SAP-C02 best practices highlight serverless real-time IoT analytics pipelines, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, cost optimization, and security. Integration with Kinesis Data Firehose or Timestream can enable advanced analytics and time-series analysis, while SageMaker can be used for predictive analytics or anomaly detection.

Overall, AWS IoT Core, Lambda, and DynamoDB provide a fully managed, scalable, secure, and cost-efficient solution for real-time IoT analytics. This architecture demonstrates the design principles tested in SAP-C02, including minimal operational overhead, serverless scalability, and secure, resilient design.

Question 153:

A company wants to reduce read latency for a globally distributed, high-traffic DynamoDB application while maintaining consistency. Which solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching layer for DynamoDB that reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds. It provides write-through caching, maintaining strong consistency with the underlying DynamoDB table. This is essential for applications that require instantaneous reads of frequently accessed data, such as e-commerce catalogs, IoT dashboards, or gaming leaderboards.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) is a general-purpose caching solution but requires application-level integration to maintain consistency with DynamoDB, adding operational complexity. RDS Read Replicas (option C) apply only to relational databases, and S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) optimizes object transfer, not database queries.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployments with automatic failover, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. CloudWatch monitors metrics such as cache hit ratios, node health, and latency. Security is enforced with IAM roles, KMS encryption for data at rest, and TLS for in-transit encryption.

Operationally, DAX reduces the load on DynamoDB, prevents throttling, and ensures predictable low-latency performance even under high traffic. Cost optimization comes from reduced read capacity consumption and pay-as-you-go pricing for DAX nodes.

SAP-C02 principles emphasize performance efficiency, operational simplicity, scalability, and reliability. DAX aligns with these best practices, enabling high-performance, globally distributed applications without manual cache management.

This architecture can integrate with monitoring and alerting tools, providing visibility into cache performance and enabling proactive operational adjustments. DAX ensures that applications can maintain high availability, low latency, and consistency at global scale.

Question 154:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless Lambda functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions provides serverless orchestration for workflows with sequential or parallel tasks, conditional branching, retries, and error handling. It integrates with Lambda, ECS, SNS, SQS, and other services, enabling scalable, resilient serverless architectures without managing infrastructure.

SWF (option B) is a legacy orchestration service requiring manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is for batch workloads and is not suitable for event-driven workflows. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service and cannot provide orchestration or conditional logic.

Step Functions includes a visual workflow editor for designing state machines, making it easy to track and debug complex workflows. CloudWatch monitors execution metrics, while X-Ray provides end-to-end tracing. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access, and KMS ensures security for workflow data.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces human intervention, ensures reliable workflow execution, and automatically handles retries and errors. Cost optimization comes from serverless pay-per-transition billing.

SAP-C02 exam scenarios use Step Functions to demonstrate best practices for serverless orchestration, including operational excellence, reliability, security, scalability, and cost efficiency. Complex workflows can execute automatically without manual monitoring, supporting event-driven architecture principles.

Question 155:

A company wants a cost-efficient, serverless pipeline to process log files stored in S3 in real time for analytics. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 can trigger Lambda functions whenever new log files are uploaded. Lambda can process, filter, transform, or enrich these logs in real time. Athena enables serverless SQL querying directly on S3 objects, allowing analytics without provisioning servers or databases.

Option B (EC2 Auto Scaling) increases operational complexity and requires manual management. Option C (RDS batch ingestion) introduces latency and capacity planning issues. Option D (SNS to EC2) is asynchronous and unsuitable for high-throughput real-time analytics.

Security is ensured with IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS. CloudTrail enables auditing. CloudWatch monitors Lambda execution, S3 events, and Athena query metrics. Alerts can be configured for failures or anomalies.

Operationally, this architecture is fully serverless, scalable, durable, and cost-efficient. Lambda and Athena scale automatically, and pay-per-use pricing reduces cost.

SAP-C02 best practices include serverless, event-driven analytics pipelines with high scalability, operational simplicity, reliability, and cost optimization. The pipeline can be extended with QuickSight, Glue, EMR, or SageMaker for further analytics or machine learning workflows.

Question 156:

A company wants to deploy a multi-region, fault-tolerant web application with low latency for global users. Which architecture is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) Multi-region ALBs, CloudFront, and Route 53 latency-based routing
B) Single-region ALB with EC2 Auto Scaling
C) Global Accelerator with single-region EC2
D) S3 static hosting with Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Multi-region ALBs, CloudFront, and Route 53 latency-based routing.

Designing a globally distributed, low-latency, fault-tolerant web application requires consideration of both network latency and high availability. Multi-region Application Load Balancers (ALBs) distribute traffic across multiple Availability Zones (AZs) within each region. This ensures resilience to individual AZ failures and improves local fault tolerance.

CloudFront, as a Content Delivery Network (CDN), caches static and dynamic content at edge locations worldwide. By placing content close to users, CloudFront reduces latency, improves application responsiveness, and decreases load on origin servers. It also integrates with Lambda@Edge, enabling real-time content manipulation closer to the user, such as custom headers, authentication, or content modification without impacting origin servers.

Route 53 latency-based routing directs user requests to the nearest healthy region. Health checks ensure traffic is routed only to operational endpoints. In case of a regional outage, Route 53 can automatically failover traffic to a secondary region, providing continuous availability with minimal downtime.

Option B, a single-region ALB with EC2 Auto Scaling, does not provide global failover and introduces a single point of failure. Option C, Global Accelerator with a single-region EC2 deployment, improves network routing but cannot protect against regional outages. Option D, S3 static hosting with Transfer Acceleration, is suitable only for static assets and does not support dynamic web application workloads.

Security is crucial. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access to AWS resources, TLS ensures encrypted data in transit, AWS WAF protects against common web attacks, and AWS Shield mitigates DDoS attacks. CloudTrail logs administrative actions, and CloudWatch monitors ALB request metrics, CloudFront cache hits/misses, and Route 53 health checks. Alerts can be configured to detect performance degradation or failures.

Operationally, this architecture is fully managed and scalable, reducing administrative overhead. ALBs, CloudFront, and Lambda@Edge automatically scale to handle spikes in traffic. Cost optimization arises from CloudFront caching, which reduces origin server load, and from pay-per-use billing for ALBs and Lambda functions.

From a SAP-C02 perspective, this architecture demonstrates best practices for globally distributed, high-availability applications, covering the pillars of operational excellence, performance efficiency, reliability, security, and cost optimization. By combining multi-region load balancing, CDN caching, and intelligent routing, organizations can ensure low-latency, resilient web applications suitable for global user bases.

Question 157:

A company wants a serverless, real-time analytics pipeline for IoT telemetry data with minimal operational overhead. Which solution is best?

Answer:

A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB
B) SQS with EC2 consumers
C) SNS with S3 triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB.

AWS IoT Core provides a scalable, fully managed ingestion layer for IoT devices. Devices can connect using MQTT, HTTPS, or WebSockets. Authentication is enforced using X.509 certificates, IAM policies, or custom authorizers, ensuring secure and authorized device communication. IoT Core scales automatically to handle millions of concurrent device connections, making it ideal for real-time telemetry ingestion.

Lambda functions act as the compute layer, automatically triggered when IoT messages arrive. Lambda functions scale dynamically based on the incoming message volume and provide the ability to process, enrich, or filter data in real time. Since Lambda is serverless, operational overhead is minimized—there is no need to provision, patch, or scale servers manually.

DynamoDB serves as a durable, low-latency NoSQL database for storing processed telemetry data. Multi-AZ replication ensures high availability, while DynamoDB Streams enable triggering additional Lambda functions for downstream analytics, alerts, or dashboards. This allows near real-time insights without additional infrastructure.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, requires managing instances and scaling, increasing operational overhead. Option C, SNS with S3 triggers, is asynchronous and less suited for high-throughput real-time processing. Option D, RDS batch processing, introduces latency and requires capacity planning, making it unsuitable for real-time workloads.

Security is enforced using IAM roles, KMS encryption at rest, and TLS encryption in transit. CloudTrail ensures auditing, while CloudWatch monitors ingestion rates, Lambda execution metrics, and DynamoDB throughput. Alerts can be set for anomalies or failures, enabling proactive operational response.

Operationally, this architecture scales automatically, maintains low latency, ensures durability, and minimizes manual intervention. Cost optimization comes from pay-per-use billing for Lambda and DynamoDB, with no idle resources.

From a SAP-C02 perspective, this design demonstrates best practices for serverless, real-time IoT analytics pipelines. It aligns with the AWS Well-Architected Framework pillars: operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, security, and cost optimization. Integration with services like Kinesis Data Firehose or Timestream can enhance analytics, while SageMaker can provide predictive capabilities.

Overall, AWS IoT Core, Lambda, and DynamoDB deliver a fully managed, scalable, secure, and cost-efficient solution, suitable for real-time IoT telemetry processing in modern cloud-native applications.

Question 158:

A company wants to reduce read latency for a globally distributed, high-traffic DynamoDB application while maintaining strong consistency. Which solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching layer designed specifically for DynamoDB. It reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds, providing a write-through cache that maintains strong consistency with the underlying table. This is critical for applications requiring low-latency access to frequently read data, such as gaming leaderboards, e-commerce product catalogs, and IoT dashboards.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) is a general-purpose cache but requires additional application-level logic to maintain consistency with DynamoDB, increasing operational complexity. RDS Read Replicas (option C) are for relational databases and cannot accelerate NoSQL workloads. S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) optimizes object transfer speeds but is irrelevant for database queries.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployments with automatic failover, ensuring high availability. CloudWatch provides metrics on cache hit ratios, node health, and latency. Security is enforced using IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS for in-transit data.

Operational benefits include reducing read load on DynamoDB, preventing throttling, and ensuring predictable performance even under high traffic. Cost optimization arises from reducing DynamoDB read capacity unit consumption and pay-per-use pricing for DAX nodes.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, DAX illustrates performance efficiency, operational simplicity, reliability, and scalability. It enables globally distributed applications to maintain low-latency, consistent reads without manual cache management.

Integration with monitoring and alerting tools like CloudWatch and X-Ray provides full visibility into cache performance, enabling proactive troubleshooting. DAX supports modern cloud-native principles, delivering scalable, low-latency, and highly available read acceleration for mission-critical applications.

Question 159:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless Lambda functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions is a serverless orchestration service that allows sequential or parallel workflows with conditional branching, retries, and error handling. It integrates with Lambda, ECS, SNS, SQS, and other AWS services, enabling scalable, resilient serverless architectures without managing infrastructure.

Option B, Amazon SWF, is a legacy solution that requires manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is for batch workloads, not event-driven orchestration. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service, not a workflow orchestration solution.

Step Functions provides a visual editor for state machines, making it easy to track workflow execution. CloudWatch monitors metrics, and X-Ray traces workflows for debugging. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access, while KMS ensures workflow data security.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces human intervention, ensures workflow reliability, and provides automatic retries and error handling. Cost optimization is achieved through serverless pay-per-transition billing.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, Step Functions exemplifies best practices for serverless orchestration, highlighting operational excellence, reliability, security, scalability, and cost efficiency. It enables event-driven applications to execute complex workflows automatically, minimizing manual monitoring and infrastructure management.

Question 160:

A company wants a cost-efficient, serverless pipeline to process log files stored in S3 in real time for analytics. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 can trigger Lambda functions when new log files arrive. Lambda functions process, transform, filter, or enrich the log files in real time. Athena provides serverless SQL queries directly on S3 objects, enabling analytics without provisioning servers or databases.

Option B, EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts, increases operational complexity. Option C, RDS batch ingestion, introduces latency and requires capacity planning. Option D, SNS to EC2, is asynchronous and unsuitable for high-throughput real-time analytics.

Security is enforced through IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS. CloudTrail captures administrative actions for auditing, and CloudWatch monitors Lambda executions, S3 events, and Athena query metrics. Alerts notify administrators of anomalies or failures.

Operationally, this architecture is fully serverless, scalable, durable, and cost-efficient. Lambda and Athena automatically scale with log volume, while pay-per-use pricing ensures cost optimization.

SAP-C02 best practices emphasize serverless, event-driven analytics pipelines, ensuring operational simplicity, reliability, scalability, and cost efficiency. This architecture can be extended with QuickSight, Glue, EMR, or SageMaker for advanced analytics or machine learning workflows.