Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional SAP-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q161-180

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Professional SAP-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 161:

A company wants to implement a multi-region relational database for a global SaaS application with minimal replication lag and disaster recovery capabilities. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) Amazon Aurora Global Database
B) RDS cross-region snapshots
C) EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication
D) Standby RDS in a single region

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Amazon Aurora Global Database.

Amazon Aurora Global Database is specifically designed for multi-region, globally distributed relational workloads. It allows the creation of a primary cluster in one region and multiple read-only secondary clusters in other regions, with replication typically less than one second, ensuring near real-time data availability globally. This architecture is ideal for SaaS applications where users across multiple continents need access to consistent and up-to-date transactional data.

The system supports automatic failover from the primary region to a secondary region, providing a low Recovery Time Objective (RTO) and Recovery Point Objective (RPO). Each region also maintains high availability by replicating data across multiple Availability Zones (AZs), protecting against localized infrastructure failures.

Option B, RDS cross-region snapshots, only provides point-in-time backup and recovery. This process is not continuous and involves significant latency for restoration, making it unsuitable for real-time global applications. Option C, EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication, introduces operational complexity, increases the risk of replication conflicts, and requires constant monitoring and patching. Option D, standby RDS in a single region, does not protect against a regional outage and fails to deliver true global resilience.

Security measures include IAM roles for fine-grained access control, KMS encryption at rest, and TLS encryption in transit. AWS CloudTrail logs administrative actions for auditing, and CloudWatch monitors metrics such as replication lag, CPU utilization, storage usage, and query performance. Alerts can be configured for anomalous activity, helping ensure operational reliability.

Operationally, Aurora Global Database provides read scaling by offloading read traffic to secondary regions, reducing the load on the primary database and minimizing latency for global users. The system also eliminates manual infrastructure management because it is fully managed and integrates automated storage scaling. Aurora Serverless can be deployed for variable workloads, further reducing cost while maintaining performance.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this architecture demonstrates best practices for multi-region relational databases, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, cost optimization, and security. Route 53 latency-based routing can be implemented to direct users to the nearest read replica, while CloudFront caching can reduce read latency for static content. Disaster recovery planning is simplified, as secondary regions can be quickly promoted to primary in case of failure.

Aurora Global Database provides a robust foundation for globally distributed applications. By leveraging managed replication, automatic failover, and multi-AZ redundancy, organizations can ensure high availability, low-latency global access, and disaster recovery without the operational burden of managing replication and failover manually. This aligns perfectly with SAP-C02 principles for designing resilient, highly available, and cost-effective architectures.

Question 162:

A company wants a serverless, real-time analytics pipeline to process IoT telemetry data with minimal operational overhead. Which solution is best?

Answer:

A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB
B) SQS with EC2 consumers
C) SNS with S3 triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB.

AWS IoT Core provides a scalable ingestion layer for millions of IoT devices. Devices can communicate via MQTT, HTTPS, or WebSockets. Authentication is handled through X.509 certificates, IAM policies, or custom authorizers, ensuring that only authorized devices can send telemetry data. This level of security is critical for IoT workloads to prevent unauthorized data access or injection.

Lambda acts as the compute layer, automatically triggered by messages from IoT Core. Lambda is serverless and scales automatically according to incoming message volume, enabling real-time processing of data without manual intervention. Functions can perform transformations, enrichment, or filtering before storing data.

DynamoDB serves as a durable, low-latency NoSQL database for processed telemetry data. Multi-AZ replication ensures resilience, while DynamoDB Streams can trigger further processing, analytics, or alerting workflows in real time.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, introduces significant operational complexity due to instance management and scaling requirements. Option C, SNS with S3 triggers, is asynchronous and unsuitable for high-throughput, low-latency IoT processing. Option D, RDS batch processing, is not suitable for real-time ingestion and requires manual capacity management.

Security is enforced using IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS encryption in transit. CloudTrail captures all administrative actions for auditing purposes, while CloudWatch monitors ingestion rates, Lambda executions, and DynamoDB throughput. Alerts help detect anomalies, ensuring operational reliability.

Operationally, this architecture scales automatically with IoT message volume, maintains low latency, ensures durability, and minimizes administrative intervention. Cost optimization comes from the serverless nature of Lambda and DynamoDB, where organizations pay only for resources consumed.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this architecture demonstrates best practices for serverless IoT analytics pipelines, covering operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, security, and cost optimization. Integration with Kinesis Data Firehose or Timestream enables advanced analytics, and SageMaker can be used for predictive modeling or anomaly detection.

Overall, AWS IoT Core, Lambda, and DynamoDB deliver a fully managed, scalable, secure, and cost-efficient solution, aligning with SAP-C02 principles for real-time, serverless IoT processing. It ensures high availability, low latency, and operational simplicity, critical for modern IoT workloads.

Question 163:

A company wants to reduce read latency for a globally distributed, high-traffic DynamoDB application while maintaining consistency. Which solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching layer for DynamoDB that reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds. It is a write-through cache, ensuring strong consistency with the underlying table. This is essential for applications requiring instant access to frequently read data, such as e-commerce catalogs, gaming leaderboards, or IoT dashboards.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) is a general-purpose cache but requires additional logic in the application to maintain consistency with DynamoDB. RDS Read Replicas (option C) are only applicable for relational databases and cannot accelerate NoSQL queries. S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) improves object transfer performance to S3 but has no effect on database query latency.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployment with automatic failover, providing high availability and fault tolerance. CloudWatch provides metrics for cache hit ratios, latency, and node health. Security is maintained with IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS for in-transit data.

Operationally, DAX reduces read pressure on DynamoDB, prevents throttling, and ensures predictable performance even under high traffic. Cost optimization arises from reducing DynamoDB read capacity unit usage and paying only for DAX nodes consumed.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, DAX demonstrates performance efficiency, operational simplicity, scalability, and reliability. It enables globally distributed applications to maintain low-latency, consistent reads without operational complexity. Integration with monitoring tools like CloudWatch and X-Ray ensures full visibility, allowing proactive troubleshooting.

DAX supports cloud-native principles, providing scalable, highly available, low-latency caching for mission-critical applications while reducing operational overhead. It aligns with the AWS Well-Architected Framework pillars and SAP-C02 best practices.

Question 164:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless Lambda functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions is a serverless workflow orchestration service. It allows sequential or parallel execution of tasks, supports conditional branching, retries, and error handling. Step Functions integrates seamlessly with Lambda, ECS, SNS, SQS, and other AWS services, enabling scalable, resilient serverless architectures without managing infrastructure.

Amazon SWF (option B) is a legacy orchestration service that requires manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is intended for batch processing workloads and is unsuitable for event-driven workflows. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service, not a workflow orchestration solution.

Step Functions provides a visual workflow editor to design state machines, simplifying monitoring and debugging. CloudWatch provides execution metrics, and X-Ray traces workflows for end-to-end debugging. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access, and KMS ensures the security of workflow data.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces manual intervention, provides automatic retries, and ensures workflow reliability. Cost optimization comes from pay-per-transition billing.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, Step Functions exemplifies best practices for serverless orchestration, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, security, scalability, and cost efficiency. It allows complex event-driven workflows to execute automatically without infrastructure management, ensuring operational simplicity and resilience.

Question 165:

A company wants a cost-efficient, serverless pipeline to process S3 log files in real time for analytics. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 can trigger Lambda functions automatically whenever new log files arrive. Lambda functions can process, transform, filter, or enrich the log data in real time. Athena provides serverless SQL querying directly on S3 objects, enabling analytics without provisioning servers or databases.

Option B (EC2 Auto Scaling) introduces operational complexity and requires capacity management. Option C (RDS batch ingestion) is slow, adds latency, and requires manual scaling. Option D (SNS to EC2) is asynchronous and unsuitable for high-throughput real-time analytics.

Security is ensured with IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS. CloudTrail captures administrative actions for auditing, while CloudWatch monitors Lambda executions, S3 events, and Athena query performance. Alerts help detect failures or anomalies.

Operationally, this architecture is fully serverless, scalable, durable, and cost-efficient. Lambda and Athena scale automatically with log volume, while pay-per-use pricing ensures cost optimization.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this architecture demonstrates best practices for serverless analytics pipelines, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, scalability, security, and cost optimization. Integration with QuickSight, Glue, EMR, or SageMaker can enable advanced analytics or machine learning workflows.

Question 166:

A company wants to implement a globally distributed web application with low latency and automatic failover. Which architecture is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) Multi-region ALBs, CloudFront, and Route 53 latency-based routing
B) Single-region ALB with EC2 Auto Scaling
C) Global Accelerator with single-region EC2
D) S3 static hosting with Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Multi-region ALBs, CloudFront, and Route 53 latency-based routing.

To deliver a web application with low latency and high availability globally, traffic must be intelligently routed to the closest operational region while maintaining fault tolerance. Multi-region Application Load Balancers (ALBs) distribute traffic across multiple Availability Zones (AZs) within each region, ensuring resilience against localized failures.

CloudFront serves as a Content Delivery Network (CDN) that caches both static and dynamic content at edge locations, reducing latency for end users. CloudFront can also integrate with Lambda@Edge, allowing custom logic such as authentication, request/response modification, and A/B testing directly at edge locations, further improving performance and reducing load on origin servers.

Route 53 provides latency-based routing. Health checks continuously monitor endpoint availability, ensuring that traffic is sent only to operational regions. In case of a regional failure, Route 53 automatically directs traffic to the next nearest healthy region, maintaining high availability and minimizing downtime.

Option B, a single-region ALB with EC2 Auto Scaling, has no global failover capability and presents a single point of failure. Option C, Global Accelerator with a single-region EC2, optimizes network routing but cannot provide disaster recovery at a regional level. Option D, S3 static hosting with Transfer Acceleration, is suitable only for static assets, not dynamic web applications.

Security measures include IAM roles, TLS for encrypted communication, AWS WAF for web application protection, and AWS Shield for DDoS mitigation. CloudTrail captures administrative activities, and CloudWatch monitors ALB metrics, CloudFront cache statistics, and Route 53 health checks. Alerts ensure operational anomalies are quickly addressed.

Operationally, this architecture scales automatically, reduces administrative overhead, and improves cost efficiency. CloudFront caching reduces load on the origin servers, and ALBs automatically scale with traffic spikes. Pay-as-you-go pricing ensures cost optimization.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this architecture demonstrates best practices for globally distributed web applications, emphasizing operational excellence, performance efficiency, reliability, security, and cost optimization. The combination of multi-region ALBs, CloudFront, and Route 53 ensures users receive fast, reliable access to web services globally.

Question 167:

A company wants a serverless, real-time analytics pipeline for processing IoT telemetry data with minimal operational overhead. Which solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB
B) SQS with EC2 consumers
C) SNS with S3 triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB.

AWS IoT Core provides a fully managed ingestion layer for IoT devices, handling millions of simultaneous connections. Devices communicate via MQTT, HTTPS, or WebSockets. Authentication is enforced using X.509 certificates, IAM policies, or custom authorizers, ensuring secure and authorized device connections.

Lambda functions act as the compute layer, automatically triggered by incoming IoT messages. Serverless Lambda eliminates the need for provisioning servers, handling scaling automatically. Lambda functions can perform real-time transformations, enrichment, filtering, or routing of telemetry data before storage or further processing.

DynamoDB serves as a durable, low-latency NoSQL database. Multi-AZ replication ensures high availability, while DynamoDB Streams enable downstream analytics or event-driven workflows. This allows near real-time insights without maintaining additional infrastructure.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, requires manual instance management and scaling. Option C, SNS with S3 triggers, is asynchronous and less suitable for real-time processing. Option D, RDS batch processing, introduces latency and requires manual capacity planning, making it unsuitable for low-latency workloads.

Security and compliance are reinforced using IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS encryption in transit. CloudTrail logs administrative actions, and CloudWatch monitors ingestion rates, Lambda executions, and DynamoDB performance. Alerts ensure operational issues are promptly addressed.

Operationally, this solution scales automatically and is cost-efficient. Pay-per-use billing ensures that organizations only pay for the compute and storage resources consumed. Lambda and DynamoDB eliminate operational overhead, and integration with Timestream, SageMaker, or Kinesis Data Firehose enables advanced analytics or predictive modeling.

For SAP-C02 exam purposes, this solution demonstrates serverless IoT analytics best practices, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, security, and cost optimization. It provides a fully managed, scalable, and resilient architecture capable of handling massive volumes of IoT data in real time.

Question 168:

A company wants to reduce read latency for a high-traffic DynamoDB application while maintaining strong consistency. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching service for DynamoDB. It reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds. DAX is a write-through cache, ensuring strong consistency with the underlying table, which is critical for applications like e-commerce platforms, gaming leaderboards, or IoT dashboards.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) can cache data but requires application logic to maintain consistency with DynamoDB. RDS Read Replicas (option C) only support relational databases, and S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) optimizes S3 object transfers rather than database queries.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployments with automatic failover, ensuring high availability. CloudWatch provides metrics on cache hit ratios, latency, and node health. Security measures include IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS encryption in transit.

Operationally, DAX reduces read load on DynamoDB, prevents throttling, and ensures predictable low-latency performance. Cost optimization comes from reducing the number of read capacity units needed in DynamoDB and paying only for DAX nodes used.

For SAP-C02 best practices, DAX demonstrates performance efficiency, operational simplicity, scalability, and reliability. It enables globally distributed applications to achieve low-latency, strongly consistent reads without operational complexity. Integration with CloudWatch and X-Ray ensures visibility into cache performance and proactive troubleshooting.

This architecture aligns with cloud-native design principles, ensuring high availability, low latency, and operational simplicity, while maintaining cost-effectiveness.

Question 169:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless Lambda functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which AWS service should be used?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions is a serverless orchestration service that supports sequential or parallel task execution with conditional branching, retries, and error handling. It integrates seamlessly with Lambda, ECS, SNS, SQS, and other AWS services, enabling scalable, resilient serverless workflows without infrastructure management.

Amazon SWF (option B) is a legacy orchestration service requiring manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is designed for batch workloads and not real-time event-driven workflows. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service and cannot orchestrate workflows.

Step Functions provides a visual workflow designer, enabling easy tracking and debugging of state machines. CloudWatch monitors workflow executions, while X-Ray provides end-to-end tracing. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access, and KMS ensures workflow data security.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces manual intervention, provides automatic retries and error handling, and ensures reliable execution of complex workflows. Cost optimization arises from pay-per-transition billing, avoiding idle resources.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, Step Functions exemplifies best practices for serverless orchestration, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, scalability, security, and cost optimization. Complex workflows execute automatically with minimal human intervention, making it ideal for modern event-driven architectures.

Question 170:

A company wants a cost-efficient, serverless pipeline to process S3 log files in real time for analytics. Which solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 can trigger Lambda functions automatically whenever new log files are uploaded. Lambda functions process, transform, filter, or enrich the log data in real time. Athena allows serverless SQL queries directly on S3 objects, enabling immediate analytics without provisioning servers or databases.

Option B, EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts, increases operational complexity. Option C, RDS batch ingestion, introduces latency and requires manual capacity planning. Option D, SNS to EC2, is asynchronous and unsuitable for real-time, high-throughput log analytics.

Security is ensured with IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS encryption in transit. CloudTrail logs administrative actions, while CloudWatch monitors Lambda executions, S3 events, and Athena query performance. Alerts can notify operators of failures or anomalies.

Operationally, this architecture is fully serverless, scalable, and cost-efficient. Lambda and Athena scale automatically based on log volume, with pay-per-use pricing ensuring cost optimization. The architecture can be extended with QuickSight, Glue, EMR, or SageMaker for advanced analytics or machine learning workflows.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this design demonstrates serverless analytics best practices, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, scalability, security, and cost efficiency. It provides a resilient, low-maintenance solution suitable for real-time log processing and analytics.

Question 171:

A company wants to deploy a multi-region, fault-tolerant relational database for a global SaaS application with minimal replication lag. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) Amazon Aurora Global Database
B) RDS cross-region snapshots
C) EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication
D) Standby RDS in a single region

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Amazon Aurora Global Database.

Amazon Aurora Global Database is specifically designed for multi-region, globally distributed relational workloads. It enables the creation of a primary cluster in one AWS region and multiple read-only secondary clusters in other regions. Replication across regions typically experiences less than one second lag, ensuring near real-time data availability for global users. This is critical for SaaS applications where consistent, up-to-date transactional data is required across continents.

The system supports automatic failover, allowing a secondary cluster in another region to be promoted to primary in the event of a regional outage. Each region also maintains high availability through multi-AZ deployments, protecting against localized infrastructure failures. This design ensures both a low Recovery Point Objective (RPO) and a low Recovery Time Objective (RTO), essential for disaster recovery planning.

Option B, RDS cross-region snapshots, only provides point-in-time backup, which is not continuous. Restoring from snapshots is time-consuming, increases downtime, and is unsuitable for real-time multi-region applications. Option C, EC2-hosted MySQL with manual replication, introduces operational complexity, risk of replication errors, and requires manual scaling and patching. Option D, standby RDS in a single region, does not protect against regional failures and cannot meet the requirements for global fault tolerance.

Security measures include IAM roles for access control, KMS encryption for data at rest, and TLS for data in transit. AWS CloudTrail logs all administrative actions, while CloudWatch monitors replication lag, CPU usage, query performance, and storage metrics. Alerts can be configured for anomalies to ensure proactive operational management.

Operationally, Aurora Global Database provides read scaling by offloading read traffic to secondary regions. This reduces load on the primary cluster and minimizes latency for global users. Automatic storage scaling ensures capacity management is handled without manual intervention. Aurora Serverless can also be deployed for variable workloads, further optimizing cost and performance.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, Aurora Global Database demonstrates best practices for global database architectures, emphasizing operational excellence, performance efficiency, reliability, cost optimization, and security. Organizations can leverage Route 53 latency-based routing to direct users to the nearest read replica, while CloudFront caching further reduces read latency for frequently accessed content. Disaster recovery is simplified, as secondary regions can be quickly promoted in case of regional failure.

Aurora Global Database offers a robust solution for SaaS applications, providing resilience, low-latency global access, and automatic failover without the operational burden of managing replication manually. This aligns perfectly with SAP-C02 principles for designing scalable, highly available, and cost-effective cloud architectures.

Question 172:

A company wants a serverless, real-time IoT analytics pipeline with minimal operational overhead. Which AWS solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB
B) SQS with EC2 consumers
C) SNS with S3 triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS IoT Core, Lambda, DynamoDB.

AWS IoT Core is a fully managed, highly scalable ingestion layer for IoT devices, capable of handling millions of concurrent device connections. Devices can connect using MQTT, HTTPS, or WebSockets, and authentication is enforced via X.509 certificates, IAM policies, or custom authorizers. This ensures secure, authorized device communication.

Lambda serves as the compute layer, automatically triggered when messages are ingested by IoT Core. Serverless Lambda automatically scales to match message volume, eliminating the need for infrastructure management. Lambda functions can transform, enrich, filter, or route telemetry data in real time before storing it in a database or initiating further processing.

DynamoDB provides durable, low-latency NoSQL storage for processed telemetry data. Multi-AZ replication ensures high availability, and DynamoDB Streams enable downstream analytics or triggers for further event-driven workflows, allowing real-time insights.

Option B, SQS with EC2 consumers, increases operational overhead because instances must be managed, scaled, and patched. Option C, SNS with S3 triggers, is asynchronous and less suitable for high-throughput, low-latency IoT data processing. Option D, RDS batch processing, introduces latency and requires manual scaling, making it unsuitable for real-time workloads.

Security is reinforced with IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS in transit. CloudTrail captures all administrative actions, while CloudWatch monitors message ingestion rates, Lambda executions, and DynamoDB performance. Alerts help detect anomalies and operational issues proactively.

Operationally, this architecture scales automatically, maintains low latency, ensures durability, and minimizes manual operational intervention. Pay-per-use pricing of Lambda and DynamoDB provides cost optimization, as resources are billed only when used. Integration with Timestream enables time-series analytics, and SageMaker can provide predictive analytics or anomaly detection.

For SAP-C02 purposes, this architecture demonstrates serverless IoT analytics best practices, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, security, and cost optimization. By using AWS managed services, organizations can focus on deriving insights from IoT data rather than managing infrastructure.

Overall, AWS IoT Core, Lambda, and DynamoDB provide a fully managed, scalable, resilient, and secure solution suitable for real-time IoT data processing, aligning with SAP-C02 principles for modern, cloud-native, serverless architectures.

Question 173:

A company wants to reduce read latency for a globally distributed, high-traffic DynamoDB application while maintaining strong consistency. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching service for DynamoDB that dramatically reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds. It is a write-through cache, maintaining strong consistency with the underlying DynamoDB table. This is critical for applications requiring instantaneous access to frequently read data, such as online catalogs, gaming leaderboards, or IoT dashboards.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) requires additional application-level logic to maintain consistency with DynamoDB, increasing operational complexity. RDS Read Replicas (option C) are applicable only for relational databases, and S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) optimizes object transfers rather than database queries.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployment with automatic failover, providing high availability. CloudWatch monitors cache hit ratios, latency, and node health. Security measures include IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS for data in transit.

Operationally, DAX reduces the read load on DynamoDB, prevents throttling, and ensures predictable performance even under high traffic. Cost optimization comes from reducing the number of read capacity units consumed by DynamoDB while paying only for the DAX nodes provisioned.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, DAX demonstrates performance efficiency, operational simplicity, scalability, and reliability. It enables globally distributed applications to maintain low-latency, strongly consistent reads without complex operational overhead. Integration with CloudWatch and X-Ray allows full visibility into cache performance, enabling proactive troubleshooting.

This architecture aligns with cloud-native best practices, delivering high availability, low latency, and operational simplicity, while maintaining cost efficiency for high-traffic, globally distributed applications.

Question 174:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless Lambda functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which AWS service should they use?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions is a serverless workflow orchestration service that allows tasks to be executed sequentially or in parallel, with conditional branching, retries, and error handling. It integrates with Lambda, ECS, SNS, SQS, and other AWS services, enabling scalable, resilient, event-driven workflows without managing underlying infrastructure.

Amazon SWF (option B) is a legacy orchestration service that requires manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is designed for batch processing workloads, not real-time event-driven orchestration. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service and cannot orchestrate workflows or implement conditional logic.

Step Functions provides a visual workflow editor that simplifies the design, monitoring, and debugging of complex state machines. CloudWatch provides execution metrics, while X-Ray traces workflows end-to-end. IAM roles enforce least-privilege access, and KMS secures workflow data.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces human intervention, ensures reliable execution of workflows, and automatically handles retries and errors. Pay-per-transition billing ensures cost efficiency.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, Step Functions exemplifies best practices for serverless orchestration, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, security, scalability, and cost optimization. Complex workflows can be executed automatically with minimal administrative overhead, aligning with modern event-driven cloud architecture principles.

Question 175:

A company wants a cost-efficient, serverless pipeline to process S3 log files in real time for analytics. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 can trigger Lambda functions whenever new log files are uploaded. Lambda functions can process, transform, filter, or enrich the log data in real time. Athena allows serverless SQL queries directly on S3 objects, enabling immediate analytics without provisioning servers or databases.

Option B, EC2 Auto Scaling, increases operational complexity and requires capacity management. Option C, RDS batch ingestion, introduces latency and requires manual scaling. Option D, SNS to EC2, is asynchronous and unsuitable for high-throughput, real-time analytics.

Security measures include IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS encryption in transit. CloudTrail captures administrative actions, while CloudWatch monitors Lambda executions, S3 events, and Athena query performance. Alerts ensure operational issues are promptly addressed.

Operationally, this architecture is fully serverless, scalable, durable, and cost-efficient. Lambda and Athena scale automatically with log volume, with pay-per-use pricing. Integration with QuickSight, Glue, EMR, or SageMaker can enable advanced analytics or machine learning.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this design demonstrates serverless analytics best practices, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, scalability, security, and cost optimization. It provides a resilient, low-maintenance solution suitable for real-time log processing.

Question 176:

A company wants to implement a multi-region, high-availability S3-based data lake with low-latency global access for analytics. Which architecture is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) with CloudFront and Route 53 latency-based routing
B) Single-region S3 bucket with Transfer Acceleration
C) S3 multi-AZ deployment with EC2 caching
D) EBS snapshots replicated manually across regions

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) with CloudFront and Route 53 latency-based routing.

S3 CRR allows objects uploaded to a bucket in one region to be automatically replicated to another bucket in a different region. This ensures high availability, durability, and disaster recovery by maintaining copies of objects in geographically separated regions. It supports cross-account replication, enabling central management of replicated data for security and compliance. CRR supports replication of both existing objects (via backfill) and new objects, ensuring complete synchronization.

CloudFront serves as a Content Delivery Network (CDN) for the data lake, caching objects at edge locations worldwide. This provides low-latency access for analytics workloads, enabling global users to retrieve large datasets quickly without creating excessive network overhead to the origin region. Lambda@Edge can also be integrated to manipulate or filter data before it reaches the client, such as masking sensitive fields, enforcing custom headers, or performing format transformations.

Route 53 latency-based routing complements this architecture by directing user requests to the closest CloudFront edge location or S3 bucket region, further reducing latency and providing resilience against regional failures. Health checks ensure requests are routed only to operational endpoints.

Option B, a single-region S3 bucket with Transfer Acceleration, optimizes upload speed for distant users but does not provide true multi-region disaster recovery or low-latency global reads. Option C, S3 multi-AZ with EC2 caching, introduces operational complexity and does not provide automated multi-region replication. Option D, EBS snapshots manually replicated across regions, is unsuitable for analytics workloads due to high operational overhead, limited scalability, and batch-oriented nature.

Security is crucial. IAM roles and bucket policies enforce least-privilege access, KMS encryption protects data at rest, and TLS encryption secures data in transit. CloudTrail logs all administrative actions for auditing. CloudWatch monitors S3 metrics, CRR status, and CloudFront performance. Alerts can be configured for replication failures or unusual access patterns, helping maintain operational excellence.

Operationally, this architecture is fully managed, resilient, and scalable, supporting petabyte-scale datasets without manual infrastructure management. CloudFront caching reduces load on the S3 origin buckets, improving cost efficiency. Pay-per-use billing ensures organizations only pay for storage, replication, and CDN usage, with no idle compute resources.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this design demonstrates best practices for multi-region data lakes, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, security, and cost optimization. It ensures low-latency global access, fault tolerance through multi-region replication, and scalable analytics capabilities, making it ideal for real-time or batch analytics scenarios.

Integration with AWS analytics services such as Athena, Glue, EMR, and SageMaker allows users to query, transform, and analyze replicated datasets efficiently. CRR ensures compliance with data residency requirements and facilitates disaster recovery planning by maintaining redundant copies in multiple regions. This approach aligns with the AWS Well-Architected Framework pillars, providing a fully managed, globally distributed, cost-effective, and resilient data lake solution.

Question 177:

A company wants to process streaming data from IoT devices in real time and provide analytics dashboards without managing servers. Which AWS solution is most suitable?

Answer:

A) Kinesis Data Streams, Lambda, DynamoDB, and QuickSight
B) SQS with EC2 consumers and RDS
C) SNS with S3 batch triggers
D) RDS batch processing

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) Kinesis Data Streams, Lambda, DynamoDB, and QuickSight.

Kinesis Data Streams provides a highly scalable, fully managed streaming ingestion platform. It can handle millions of events per second, making it ideal for IoT telemetry. Producers (IoT devices) send data to Kinesis streams in real time, which is then consumed by Lambda functions for processing. Lambda scales automatically, ensuring that processing keeps pace with ingestion rates, without requiring server provisioning or management.

Lambda functions can perform data transformations, enrichment, filtering, aggregation, or routing to storage layers or analytics services. DynamoDB acts as a low-latency, scalable storage backend for processed data. Multi-AZ replication ensures high availability and durability, while DynamoDB Streams enable further downstream processing or triggering of notifications and alerts.

QuickSight provides serverless, interactive dashboards for visualization, allowing end-users to gain insights in near real time without managing any infrastructure. This architecture eliminates operational overhead, provides real-time analytics, and scales with workload demands.

Option B (SQS with EC2 consumers and RDS) requires manual instance management and scaling, increasing operational complexity. Option C (SNS with S3 batch triggers) is asynchronous and unsuitable for high-throughput, low-latency analytics. Option D (RDS batch processing) introduces delays and requires capacity planning, making it inappropriate for real-time streaming workloads.

Security measures include IAM roles, KMS encryption at rest, and TLS encryption in transit. CloudTrail captures all administrative actions, while CloudWatch monitors Lambda executions, Kinesis metrics, DynamoDB throughput, and QuickSight usage. Alerts enable proactive management of operational anomalies.

Operationally, this architecture is serverless, scalable, resilient, and cost-efficient. Pay-per-use pricing ensures that organizations only pay for what they use. Lambda and DynamoDB scale automatically based on incoming traffic, and Kinesis can handle variable workloads without manual intervention.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this architecture demonstrates best practices for serverless streaming analytics, including operational excellence, reliability, performance efficiency, security, and cost optimization. Integration with Timestream or SageMaker can enable advanced predictive analytics or anomaly detection, extending the capabilities of real-time dashboards.

This solution is ideal for IoT telemetry scenarios where real-time insights, low operational overhead, and global scalability are required, aligning with cloud-native best practices and the AWS Well-Architected Framework.

Question 178:

A company wants to reduce read latency for a globally distributed, high-traffic DynamoDB application. Which solution is most appropriate while maintaining strong consistency?

Answer:

A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)
B) ElastiCache Redis
C) RDS Read Replicas
D) S3 Transfer Acceleration

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX).

DAX is a fully managed, in-memory caching service designed specifically for DynamoDB. It reduces read latency from milliseconds to microseconds while maintaining strong consistency. This is critical for use cases like gaming leaderboards, e-commerce product catalogs, or IoT dashboards, where real-time data access is necessary.

ElastiCache Redis (option B) requires additional application logic to maintain consistency with DynamoDB, increasing complexity. RDS Read Replicas (option C) are for relational databases, and S3 Transfer Acceleration (option D) optimizes file transfers rather than database reads.

DAX supports multi-AZ deployment with automatic failover, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. CloudWatch provides metrics on cache hit ratios, latency, and node health. IAM roles enforce access control, and KMS ensures encryption at rest while TLS protects data in transit.

Operationally, DAX reduces load on DynamoDB, prevents throttling, and provides predictable low-latency reads even under high traffic. Cost optimization comes from reduced read capacity unit usage and paying only for DAX nodes consumed.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, DAX demonstrates performance efficiency, operational simplicity, scalability, and reliability. It allows globally distributed applications to maintain low-latency, strongly consistent reads without additional operational complexity. CloudWatch and X-Ray monitoring provide end-to-end visibility, allowing proactive detection of performance issues.

DAX aligns with cloud-native principles, providing high availability, scalability, low latency, and operational simplicity, making it ideal for mission-critical, high-traffic DynamoDB applications.

Question 179:

A company wants to orchestrate multiple serverless Lambda functions with conditional logic, retries, and error handling. Which AWS service is most suitable?

Answer:

A) AWS Step Functions
B) Amazon SWF
C) AWS Batch
D) Amazon SQS

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) AWS Step Functions.

Step Functions is a serverless orchestration service that supports sequential or parallel workflows, conditional branching, error handling, and retries. It integrates with Lambda, ECS, SNS, SQS, and other AWS services, enabling complex, resilient serverless workflows without managing servers.

Amazon SWF (option B) is a legacy service requiring manual worker management. AWS Batch (option C) is intended for batch processing workloads, not real-time orchestration. Amazon SQS (option D) is a messaging service and cannot orchestrate workflows or implement conditional logic.

Step Functions provides a visual workflow editor, making it easy to monitor and debug state machines. CloudWatch captures execution metrics, and X-Ray provides end-to-end tracing. IAM roles ensure least-privilege access, and KMS secures workflow data.

Operationally, Step Functions reduces manual intervention, ensures reliable execution of workflows, and provides automatic retries and error handling. Pay-per-transition billing ensures cost optimization.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, Step Functions exemplifies best practices for serverless orchestration, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, security, scalability, and cost efficiency. Complex workflows execute automatically, aligning with modern event-driven cloud-native principles.

Question 180:

A company wants a cost-efficient, serverless pipeline to process S3 log files in real time for analytics. Which solution is most appropriate?

Answer:

A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena
B) EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts
C) RDS batch ingestion
D) SNS to EC2

Explanation:

The correct answer is A) S3 event triggers with Lambda and Athena.

S3 can trigger Lambda functions whenever new log files are uploaded. Lambda functions can process, transform, filter, or enrich log data in real time. Athena allows serverless SQL queries directly on S3 objects, enabling immediate analytics without server provisioning.

Option B, EC2 Auto Scaling with custom scripts, increases operational complexity. Option C, RDS batch ingestion, introduces latency and requires manual scaling. Option D, SNS to EC2, is asynchronous and unsuitable for high-throughput, real-time analytics.

Security is ensured with IAM roles, KMS encryption, and TLS in transit. CloudTrail captures administrative actions, while CloudWatch monitors Lambda executions, S3 events, and Athena query performance. Alerts ensure operational issues are promptly addressed.

Operationally, this architecture is fully serverless, scalable, durable, and cost-efficient. Lambda and Athena scale automatically with log volume, and pay-per-use pricing optimizes cost. Integration with QuickSight, Glue, EMR, or SageMaker enables advanced analytics or machine learning workflows.

From an SAP-C02 perspective, this design demonstrates serverless analytics best practices, emphasizing operational excellence, reliability, scalability, security, and cost optimization. It provides a resilient, low-maintenance solution suitable for real-time log processing and analytics.