Microsoft AZ-700 Designing and Implementing Microsoft Azure Networking Solutions Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q101-120

Visit here for our full Microsoft AZ-700 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 101:

Your organization needs to centralize inspection of outbound traffic from multiple VNets while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must automatically adapt to changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture should you implement?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound inspection while maintaining isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of routes using BGP between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in the spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure that all outbound traffic flows through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and cost, and lacks centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance. The design delivers centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and reduced management overhead.

Question 102:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale for multi-region deployments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid networks, enabling centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 103:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized outbound traffic inspection through NVAs. Spokes must maintain isolation, and routes must adapt to on-premises changes automatically. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound inspection through NVAs in the hub while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs inspect all traffic for compliance, security, and monitoring. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes using BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all outbound traffic through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and threat monitoring. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce security or centralized inspection. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic reflection of on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risks. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices by providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. New spokes can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting growth. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and enforcement of organizational policies.

Question 104:

Your organization needs NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets via BGP. Static routes (Option A) are error-prone, require manual updates, and do not scale in dynamic, multi-region environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, offers limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Dynamic BGP routing via Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP sessions, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains network segmentation. NVAs stay aware of all reachable prefixes, Azure VNets receive updates automatically, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 105:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for TLS inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces central monitoring. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved with multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection enables auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 106:

Your organization needs to centralize outbound traffic inspection for multiple VNets using NVAs while maintaining spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect changes from on-premises networks. Which architecture should you implement?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub provides centralized inspection for outbound traffic while preserving isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server enables dynamic BGP route propagation between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic flows through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, threat monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and management overhead while providing no centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved through multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and enforcement of organizational policies, delivering centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 107:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only

D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, requires constant manual updates, and does not scale in large, dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not support full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures route consistency, and supports large-scale multi-region deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risks, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 108:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized outbound traffic inspection through NVAs. Spokes must maintain isolation, and routes must adapt automatically to on-premises changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

A hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound inspection through NVAs in the hub while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs provide inspection for compliance, threat monitoring, and logging. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes via BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to direct outbound traffic through hub NVAs for inspection, monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and cost. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risks. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and enforcement of organizational policies while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 109:

Your organization needs NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) require manual updates and are error-prone, making them unsuitable for dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes dynamically. Using Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations gain automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 110:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while maintaining spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 111:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic from multiple VNets through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically adapt to on-premises network changes. Which architecture should you implement?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

The hub-and-spoke architecture centralizes outbound traffic inspection through NVAs in the hub while maintaining spoke isolation. Azure Route Server allows dynamic route propagation using BGP between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all outbound traffic through hub NVAs for inspection, threat monitoring, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases management complexity, operational overhead, and cost while lacking centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity without enforcing inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, and dynamic BGP routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 112:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server enables NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, requires manual updates, and does not scale in large, dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale, multi-region deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when route priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This aligns with AZ-700 best practices for hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 113:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized outbound traffic inspection through NVAs. Spokes must maintain isolation, and routes must adapt automatically to on-premises network changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound inspection through NVAs in the hub while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs provide inspection for compliance, threat monitoring, and logging. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes via BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to direct outbound traffic through hub NVAs for inspection, monitoring, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, management overhead, and cost. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation requirements. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risks. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and enforcement of organizational policies while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

Question 114:

Your organization needs NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Static routes (Option A) require manual updates and are error-prone, making them unsuitable for dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Dynamic BGP routing via Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures correct traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and simplified management.

Question 115:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in the spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.

Question 116:

Your organization needs to centralize inspection of outbound traffic from multiple VNets through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must automatically reflect changes in on-premises networks. Which architecture should you implement?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, applying UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture centralizes outbound traffic inspection through NVAs in the hub while maintaining isolation for spoke VNets. Azure Route Server allows dynamic route propagation using BGP between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling, directing all outbound traffic through hub NVAs for inspection, threat monitoring, logging, and compliance. Option A, deploying NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases management complexity, operational overhead, and cost while providing no centralized monitoring. Option C, peering VNets using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce inspection or security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling ensures inspection of all egress traffic, and BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while delivering centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs, supporting scalability and growth.

Question 117:

Your organization requires NVAs to automatically exchange routes with Azure VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Enable VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Use Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets using BGP. Option A, static routes, is error-prone, requires manual updates, and does not scale for dynamic, multi-region environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow full bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, configure route filters, and maintain compliance with organizational and regulatory requirements. High availability ensures continuous propagation even during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, error reduction, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Question 118:

Your organization deploys multiple VNets and requires centralized outbound traffic inspection through NVAs. Spokes must maintain isolation, and routes must automatically adapt to on-premises changes. Which architecture is recommended?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static routes
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets with propagated system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke topology centralizes outbound inspection through NVAs in the hub while preserving spoke isolation. NVAs provide inspection for compliance, threat monitoring, and logging. Azure Route Server dynamically propagates routes via BGP between on-premises networks, Azure VNets, and NVAs, eliminating the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to direct outbound traffic through hub NVAs for inspection, monitoring, and compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static routes, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering with system routes, bypasses inspection and violates isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, allows connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved with active-active VPN Gateways and multiple NVA instances. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, route propagation, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Dynamic routing ensures automatic adaptation to on-premises network changes, reducing misconfiguration risks. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic. This design aligns with AZ-700 best practices, providing centralized control, operational simplicity, scalability, security, and regulatory compliance. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, and policy enforcement while allowing easy addition of new spokes without modifying UDRs.

In hybrid cloud environments, the Route Server’s efficiency extends beyond routing alone. Because NVAs always maintain awareness of current prefixes, security policies, firewall rules, and inspection logic remain accurate. NVAs can make better forwarding decisions, apply the correct filtering rules, and maintain proper segmentation between environments. Azure VNets automatically receive updates about new on-premises subnets, reducing latency and eliminating manual updates during infrastructure expansion.

Overall, Azure Route Server aligns seamlessly with AZ-700 best practices by improving automation, security, resiliency, and manageability. Organizations that adopt this approach gain a more robust hybrid network, reduced operational burden, and a modernized routing architecture that can evolve with their cloud deployments.

Question 119:

Your organization needs NVAs to automatically learn and advertise routes between VNets and on-premises networks without manual updates. Which solution should you implement?

A) Configure static routes for NVAs
B) Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP
C) Use VNet peering with propagated system routes only
D) Manage routes through Azure Firewall Manager

Answer: B) – Deploy Azure Route Server and peer NVAs using BGP

Explanation

Azure Route Server allows NVAs to dynamically advertise learned on-premises prefixes and automatically learn system and user routes from Azure VNets via BGP. Static routes (Option A) require manual updates and are error-prone, making them unsuitable for dynamic environments. Option C, VNet peering with propagated system routes, provides limited propagation and does not allow bidirectional learning for NVAs. Option D, Azure Firewall Manager, manages firewall policies but does not propagate routes. Dynamic BGP routing via Route Server reduces operational overhead, ensures routing consistency, and supports large-scale deployments. Administrators can monitor BGP session health, apply route filters, and maintain compliance with security standards. High availability ensures continuous route propagation during partial failures. Dynamic routing ensures proper traffic flow through NVAs, reduces misconfiguration risk, and maintains proper network segmentation. NVAs remain aware of reachable prefixes, Azure VNets automatically receive updates, and on-premises learned routes propagate efficiently. Route Server coexists with UDRs when priorities are configured, providing flexible route control. This approach aligns with AZ-700 best practices, supporting hybrid networks, centralized inspection, operational efficiency, and scalability. Organizations benefit from automated routing, reduced errors, secure connectivity, and streamlined management.

Azure Route Server’s ability to dynamically exchange routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks makes it the ideal solution for environments where routing changes frequently, hybrid connectivity is involved, and high availability is essential. By extending BGP capabilities directly into the Azure fabric, Route Server removes the traditional limitations imposed by static routing and manual configuration. This dynamic interaction ensures that any prefix learned by an NVA from the on-premises network is immediately available to Azure, while system and user-defined Azure routes are also automatically shared with NVAs. This creates a highly adaptive routing environment where traffic follows the most accurate and efficient paths without administrative intervention.

One of the most important benefits of Route Server is the enhancement of resiliency in hybrid and multi-NVA designs. In traditional topologies, NVAs operating in active-active or active-standby modes require careful manual route manipulation using UDRs, health probes, or custom scripts to ensure traffic is correctly forwarded. With Route Server, BGP automatically detects when one NVA becomes unavailable or stops advertising prefixes. Azure instantly adjusts the routing tables to reflect the remaining active paths. This ensures seamless failover, minimizes downtime, and eliminates the need for complex scripts or performance-impacting workarounds. For enterprises that must maintain constant uptime and predictable failover behavior, this automated convergence is a major operational advantage.

Dynamic routing also plays a key role in reducing configuration drift. In environments using static UDRs, administrators must frequently update route tables to reflect changes in network topology, new subnets, or adjustments to hybrid connectivity. As the estate grows, the number of required UDR entries can become extremely large, increasing the risk of human errors, stale routes, and inconsistent routing behavior. Route Server removes these risks by allowing routing changes to propagate programmatically through BGP. As soon as an NVA or on-premises router updates its prefixes, the information is automatically shared with Azure, ensuring the environment always remains consistent with the real network state.

Additionally, Route Server supports operational transparency and compliance. Organizations can monitor BGP session health, review route advertisements, validate prefix filters, and apply routing policies to maintain security and segmentation. Administrators can verify that only authorized networks are advertised into Azure, preventing route leaks or accidental exposure of internal prefixes. This supports compliance with industry standards by providing traceability and verification of routing behavior. Combined with Azure Monitor and network insights tools, Route Server enhances visibility into hybrid routing flows, making troubleshooting significantly easier.

Another advantage is the support for large-scale enterprise deployments. As organizations expand their VNets, regions, or hybrid connections, Route Server continues to scale without requiring major architectural changes. It works with multiple NVAs, supports a variety of SD-WAN platforms, and integrates cleanly with hub-and-spoke, mesh, and hybrid topologies. Its ability to coexist with UDRs allows organizations to selectively control traffic paths where necessary, such as enforcing next-hop rules for security inspection while still benefiting from BGP-based dynamic route propagation.

Question 120:

Your organization requires centralized inspection of outbound traffic through NVAs while preserving spoke isolation. Routes must dynamically reflect on-premises network changes. Which architecture is optimal?

A) Deploy NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs
B) Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes
C) Peer VNets using system routes
D) Use Azure Virtual WAN unsecured hubs

Answer: B) – Hub-and-spoke with NVAs in the hub and Azure Route Server, using UDRs in spokes

Explanation

Hub-and-spoke architecture with NVAs in the hub centralizes outbound traffic inspection while preserving spoke isolation. Azure Route Server enables dynamic propagation of BGP routes between NVAs, Azure VNets, and on-premises networks, removing the need for manual UDR updates. UDRs in spokes enforce forced tunneling to ensure all traffic passes through hub NVAs for inspection, logging, and regulatory compliance. Option A, NVAs in each spoke with static UDRs, increases operational complexity, cost, and reduces centralized monitoring capabilities. Option C, VNet peering using system routes, bypasses inspection and violates spoke isolation. Option D, unsecured Virtual WAN hubs, provides connectivity but does not enforce security policies. High availability is achieved using multiple NVA instances and active-active VPN Gateways. Administrators can monitor route propagation, BGP session health, and NVA performance to maintain operational efficiency and compliance. Forced tunneling guarantees inspection of all egress traffic, while BGP ensures dynamic adaptation to on-premises network changes. This architecture aligns with AZ-700 best practices, delivering secure, scalable, compliant, and operationally efficient multi-region deployments. New VNets can be added without modifying UDRs. Centralized inspection supports auditing, threat intelligence integration, policy enforcement, and regulatory compliance while providing centralized control, operational simplicity, and reduced management overhead.