Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer – Professional DOP-C02 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 9 Q 161-180

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified DevOps Engineer – Professional DOP-C02 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 161

A company runs multiple microservices on Amazon ECS Fargate and wants safe, automated canary deployments with traffic shifting, monitoring, and automatic rollback. Which solution is best?

A) ECS rolling updates with custom health check grace periods.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments integrated with ECS and ALB.

C) CloudFormation stack updates with rollback enabled.

D) ALB slow start mode for gradual traffic ramp-up.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) ECS rolling updates replace ECS tasks gradually to maintain service availability. Health check grace periods ensure that slow-starting containers are not prematurely marked unhealthy. This strategy is suitable for basic deployments but does not provide automated rollback based on application-level metrics, nor does it offer precise traffic shifting between old and new service versions. Rolling updates primarily manage the ECS tasks lifecycle without integrating application performance monitoring or canary-style traffic incrementally. As a result, this method cannot guarantee safe, risk-managed deployments in production microservices environments.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments offers a fully managed canary deployment strategy integrated with ECS and ALB. It allows the creation of a new target group for updated tasks while the old tasks remain serving traffic. Incremental traffic can be shifted to the new version according to defined schedules or percentages. ALB health checks and CloudWatch metrics continuously monitor the new tasks’ health. If failures or performance degradation occur, CodeDeploy automatically rolls back traffic to the stable version. It supports linear or canary deployment strategies, enabling fine-grained control over production rollouts. This method provides safety, automated monitoring, and rollback capabilities, fulfilling all requirements for production-grade deployments.

C) CloudFormation stack updates enable rollback in case of template-level errors during infrastructure updates. While effective for ensuring infrastructure consistency, CloudFormation cannot monitor application-level metrics or perform traffic shifting, meaning it cannot orchestrate a canary deployment for ECS services. Rollback is triggered only by resource-level failures rather than runtime performance issues.

D) ALB slow start mode ramps up traffic to new targets gradually, helping prevent sudden traffic spikes and container overload. However, it does not orchestrate deployments, monitor application health, or automatically rollback updates, making it insufficient for fully managed canary deployments.

Why the correct answer is B): AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments provide comprehensive canary deployment orchestration, including traffic shifting, monitoring, and automated rollback. Other approaches only cover partial aspects and cannot guarantee safe, automated deployment in production.

Question 162

A company stores high-volume logs in Amazon S3 and requires a serverless solution to extract structured fields, index data, and enable fast search queries. Which solution is best?

A) Deploy ELK stack on EC2.

B) Use S3 Select for querying logs.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless with S3 ingestion pipelines.

D) Store logs in DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes.

Answer: C)

Explanation

A) Deploying an ELK stack on EC2 provides full-featured log analytics, including dashboards, aggregations, and full-text search. However, it requires manual provisioning, scaling, patching, and monitoring of EC2 instances, violating the serverless requirement. Operational overhead, capacity planning, and infrastructure maintenance make this solution unsuitable for a fully managed, serverless log analytics environment.

B) S3 Select allows SQL-like queries on individual objects stored in S3. While convenient for small, ad hoc queries, it cannot index multiple objects or provide scalable full-text search across large datasets. It also lacks aggregation, automated structured field extraction, and visualization, making it impractical for enterprise-scale log analysis.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless provides a fully managed, serverless solution for log analytics. It integrates with S3 ingestion pipelines, automatically indexing incoming logs. Features include structured field extraction, full-text search, aggregation, and near real-time querying. OpenSearch Serverless scales automatically, requires no server management, and integrates with monitoring tools such as CloudWatch. It satisfies all requirements: serverless operation, automated indexing, fast query performance, and minimal operational overhead.

D) DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes provides low-latency lookups for structured data. However, it cannot efficiently handle unstructured logs or full-text search. Using DynamoDB for log analytics would require additional infrastructure like OpenSearch or custom indexing, increasing complexity and operational costs.

Why the correct answer is C): OpenSearch Serverless delivers a scalable, serverless, fully managed log analytics solution capable of fast search, automated indexing, and minimal operational overhead. Other options either require servers or lack full-text search capabilities at scale.

Question 163

A DevOps team wants to reduce AWS Lambda cold start latency for high-traffic functions while controlling costs for low-traffic functions. Which solution is best?

A) Enable Provisioned Concurrency for high-traffic functions.

B) Increase memory allocation for all Lambda functions.

C) Deploy Lambda functions in a VPC.

D) Replace Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Provisioned Concurrency pre-warms Lambda execution environments, eliminating cold start latency. Applying it selectively to high-traffic functions ensures low-latency performance where it matters most while keeping infrequently invoked functions on-demand, controlling costs. Provisioned Concurrency is serverless-native, requires no additional infrastructure, and can scale automatically with traffic, making it a precise and cost-effective solution for performance-sensitive Lambda functions.

B) Increasing memory allocation slightly improves CPU performance and initialization speed, potentially reducing cold start latency. However, it does not prevent cold starts entirely and increases costs for all functions, including low-traffic ones, making it less efficient than selective Provisioned Concurrency.

C) Deploying Lambda in a VPC historically increased cold start latency due to ENI attachment overhead. While improvements have mitigated this, VPC deployment does not eliminate cold starts and introduces additional configuration complexity.

D) Replacing Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks avoids cold starts because containers are long-lived. However, this introduces operational overhead, including task scheduling, scaling, and monitoring, and incurs always-on costs. It also violates the minimal code-change principle and is less efficient than using Lambda with Provisioned Concurrency.

Why the correct answer is A): Provisioned Concurrency selectively pre-warms high-traffic Lambda functions, reducing cold start latency while controlling costs. Other options either fail to eliminate cold starts or introduce unnecessary operational complexity.

Question 164

A company requires pre-deployment enforcement of compliance policies on Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Policies include mandatory tags, encryption, and restricted resource types. Violations must block deployment. Which solution is best?

A) AWS Config rules.

B) Sentinel policies in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise.

C) Git pre-commit hooks.

D) CloudFormation Guard.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) AWS Config rules operate after deployment, detecting noncompliance and optionally triggering remediation. While Config can ensure post-deployment compliance, it cannot prevent Terraform modules from being applied, making it reactive rather than proactive. This does not satisfy pre-deployment enforcement requirements.

B) Sentinel policies provide policy-as-code enforcement in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise. Policies are evaluated during terraform plan or terraform apply. Violations fail the run, automatically blocking deployment. Sentinel supports enforcing mandatory tags, encryption, and restricting resource types. Integrated into CI/CD pipelines, Sentinel ensures pre-deployment governance, preventing noncompliant resources from reaching production. Sentinel also allows fine-grained policy configuration for different environments, providing both flexibility and enforceable guardrails without adding operational overhead.

C) Git pre-commit hooks enforce coding standards locally before committing code. They are bypassable and cannot reliably enforce policies in automated CI/CD pipelines, making them insufficient for pre-deployment compliance enforcement.

D) CloudFormation Guard validates CloudFormation templates but is not compatible with Terraform modules without conversion, adding operational complexity. It cannot natively enforce pre-deployment policies in Terraform CI/CD pipelines.

Why the correct answer is B): Sentinel policies enforce pre-deployment compliance automatically, blocking noncompliant Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Other options are reactive, bypassable, or incompatible.

Question 165

A company wants end-to-end distributed tracing for serverless APIs including API Gateway, Lambda, DynamoDB, and S3, with minimal code changes, latency visualization, and bottleneck detection. Which solution is best?

A) Enable AWS X-Ray active tracing.

B) Use CloudWatch Logs Insights for manual correlation.

C) Deploy OpenTelemetry on EC2 instances.

D) Implement manual correlation IDs in code.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) AWS X-Ray active tracing provides fully managed distributed tracing for serverless applications. It automatically captures segments and subsegments for Lambda, API Gateway, DynamoDB, and S3. The service map visualizes latency, errors, and bottlenecks across services. Minimal code changes are required—enable active tracing on Lambda functions and optionally use the X-Ray SDK for custom subsegments. X-Ray scales automatically, integrates with CloudWatch dashboards, and provides near real-time observability. This satisfies all requirements: serverless integration, minimal code changes, latency visualization, and end-to-end tracing.

B) CloudWatch Logs Insights allows querying logs for latency and errors. Manual correlation is possible but requires significant effort, is error-prone, and does not provide automated service maps or bottleneck detection. It is impractical for production-scale tracing.

C) Deploying OpenTelemetry on EC2 introduces operational overhead. Each service requires instrumentation, and collectors must be deployed, scaled, and maintained. OpenTelemetry does not natively integrate with serverless AWS services, making it unsuitable for minimal-code solutions.

D) Implementing manual correlation IDs requires pervasive code changes across services. While helpful for debugging, it does not provide automated visualization, service maps, or bottleneck detection, and maintaining correlation across multiple services is error-prone.

Why the correct answer is A): AWS X-Ray provides automated, serverless, end-to-end tracing with latency visualization and bottleneck detection while requiring minimal code changes. Other options require manual effort, additional infrastructure, or cannot provide automated observability.

Question 166

A company runs multiple microservices on Amazon ECS Fargate and wants safe, automated canary deployments with traffic shifting, monitoring, and automatic rollback. Which solution is best?

A) ECS rolling updates with custom health check grace periods.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments integrated with ECS and ALB.

C) CloudFormation stack updates with rollback enabled.

D) ALB slow start mode for gradual traffic ramp-up.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) ECS rolling updates replace tasks gradually while maintaining service availability. Health check grace periods ensure that slow-starting containers are not marked unhealthy prematurely. This method helps maintain basic availability but does not provide automated rollback based on application-level metrics, nor does it allow incremental traffic shifting between old and new versions. Rolling updates primarily handle ECS task lifecycle rather than orchestrating safe canary deployments. In production microservices, this leaves risk for failures during deployments because manual monitoring and intervention are required.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments is a fully managed deployment orchestration solution integrated with ECS and ALB. It allows creation of a new target group for updated tasks, with traffic shifted incrementally from old to new versions based on defined percentages or schedules. ALB health checks and CloudWatch metrics monitor new tasks, and traffic can be automatically rolled back if failures occur. CodeDeploy supports canary and linear strategies, providing safe, automated, monitored, and reversible deployments. This method minimizes risk and ensures production stability with minimal operational overhead.

C) CloudFormation stack updates support rollback at the resource level if a template fails. While effective for infrastructure changes, CloudFormation cannot monitor application-level performance, manage traffic shifting, or automate rollback based on runtime behavior, making it unsuitable for orchestrating canary deployments of microservices.

D) ALB slow start mode gradually ramps traffic to new targets to prevent sudden spikes. It is a traffic management feature but does not handle deployments, monitor health, or automatically rollback failed updates, so it cannot provide safe, fully managed canary deployments.

Why the correct answer is B): AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments provide comprehensive canary deployment orchestration, including traffic shifting, monitoring, and automated rollback. Other options address only partial aspects of deployment management.

Question 167

A company stores high-volume logs in Amazon S3 and requires a serverless solution to extract structured fields, index data, and enable fast search queries. Which solution is best?

A) Deploy ELK stack on EC2.

B) Use S3 Select for querying logs.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless with S3 ingestion pipelines.

D) Store logs in DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes.

Answer: C)

Explanation

A) Deploying an ELK stack on EC2 provides full-featured log analytics, including dashboards, aggregations, and full-text search. However, it requires manual provisioning, scaling, patching, and monitoring, which violates the serverless requirement. Operational overhead, capacity planning, and infrastructure maintenance make EC2 unsuitable for a fully managed, serverless solution.

B) S3 Select allows SQL-like queries on individual S3 objects. It is useful for small ad hoc queries but cannot index multiple objects or perform scalable full-text search across large datasets. S3 Select lacks automated structured field extraction, aggregation, and visualization, making it impractical for production-scale log analytics.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless provides a fully managed, serverless solution for log analytics. It integrates with S3 ingestion pipelines, automatically indexing incoming logs. Features include structured field extraction, full-text search, aggregation, and near real-time querying. OpenSearch Serverless scales automatically, requires no server management, and integrates with CloudWatch for monitoring and alerting. It satisfies all requirements: serverless operation, automated indexing, fast search, and minimal operational burden.

D) DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes is suitable for structured data lookups but cannot efficiently handle unstructured logs or provide full-text search. Using DynamoDB for log analytics would require additional infrastructure, increasing complexity and operational costs.

Why the correct answer is C): OpenSearch Serverless delivers a scalable, serverless, fully managed log analytics solution with fast search, automated indexing, and minimal operational overhead. Other options either require servers or cannot provide full-text search at scale.

Question 168

A DevOps team wants to reduce AWS Lambda cold start latency for high-traffic functions while controlling costs for low-traffic functions. Which solution is best?

A) Enable Provisioned Concurrency for high-traffic functions.

B) Increase memory allocation for all Lambda functions.

C) Deploy Lambda functions in a VPC.

D) Replace Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Provisioned Concurrency pre-warms Lambda execution environments to eliminate cold starts. By applying it selectively to high-traffic functions, latency-sensitive endpoints remain responsive while low-traffic functions remain on-demand, controlling costs. This approach is serverless-native, cost-effective, and precise, ensuring consistent performance without additional infrastructure. Provisioned Concurrency scales automatically with traffic, making it ideal for production-critical Lambda functions.

B) Increasing memory allocation improves CPU and initialization speed, potentially reducing cold start latency slightly. However, it does not prevent cold starts entirely and increases costs for all functions, including low-traffic ones, making it less efficient than selective Provisioned Concurrency.

C) Deploying Lambda in a VPC historically increased cold start latency due to ENI initialization overhead. While improvements have mitigated some latency, VPC deployment does not eliminate cold starts and adds operational complexity.

D) Replacing Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks avoids cold starts since containers are long-lived. However, it introduces operational overhead, including task management, scaling, monitoring, and always-on costs. It also violates the minimal code-change principle.

Why the correct answer is A): Provisioned Concurrency selectively pre-warms high-traffic Lambda functions, reducing cold start latency while controlling costs. Other options either fail to remove cold starts or increase operational complexity and expense.

Question 169

A company requires pre-deployment enforcement of compliance policies on Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Policies include mandatory tags, encryption, and restricted resource types. Violations must block deployment. Which solution is best?

A) AWS Config rules.

B) Sentinel policies in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise.

C) Git pre-commit hooks.

D) CloudFormation Guard.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) AWS Config rules evaluate resources after deployment. While Config can detect violations and trigger remediation, it cannot prevent Terraform modules from being applied, making it reactive rather than proactive. This does not satisfy pre-deployment enforcement requirements.

B) Sentinel policies provide policy-as-code enforcement in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise. Policies are evaluated during terraform plan or terraform apply. Violations fail the run, automatically blocking deployment. Sentinel supports mandatory tags, encryption, and restricting resource types. Integrated into CI/CD pipelines, Sentinel ensures pre-deployment governance, preventing noncompliant resources from reaching production. Fine-grained configuration allows flexibility across different environments, providing enforceable guardrails without adding operational overhead.

C) Git pre-commit hooks enforce rules locally before code commits. They are bypassable and cannot reliably enforce policies in automated CI/CD pipelines, making them insufficient for pre-deployment compliance enforcement.

D) CloudFormation Guard validates CloudFormation templates. While effective for CloudFormation, it is not compatible with Terraform modules without conversion, adding complexity. It cannot enforce pre-deployment policies natively in Terraform pipelines.

Why the correct answer is B): Sentinel policies enforce pre-deployment compliance automatically, blocking noncompliant Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Other options are reactive, bypassable, or incompatible.

Question 170

A company wants end-to-end distributed tracing for serverless APIs including API Gateway, Lambda, DynamoDB, and S3, with minimal code changes, latency visualization, and bottleneck detection. Which solution is best?

A) Enable AWS X-Ray active tracing.

B) Use CloudWatch Logs Insights for manual correlation.

C) Deploy OpenTelemetry on EC2 instances.

D) Implement manual correlation IDs in code.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) AWS X-Ray active tracing provides fully managed distributed tracing for serverless applications. It automatically captures segments and subsegments for Lambda, API Gateway, DynamoDB, and S3. The service map visualizes latency, errors, and bottlenecks across services. Minimal code changes are required—enable active tracing on Lambda functions and optionally use the X-Ray SDK for custom subsegments. X-Ray scales automatically, integrates with CloudWatch dashboards, and provides near real-time observability. This satisfies all requirements: serverless integration, minimal code changes, latency visualization, and end-to-end tracing.

B) CloudWatch Logs Insights allows querying logs for latency and errors. Manual correlation is possible but requires significant effort, is error-prone, and does not provide automated service maps or bottleneck detection. It is impractical for production-scale tracing.

C) Deploying OpenTelemetry on EC2 introduces operational overhead. Each service requires instrumentation, and collectors must be deployed, scaled, and maintained. OpenTelemetry does not natively integrate with serverless AWS services, making it unsuitable for minimal-code solutions.

D) Implementing manual correlation IDs requires pervasive code changes across services. While helpful for debugging, it does not provide automated visualization, service maps, or bottleneck detection, and maintaining correlation across multiple services is error-prone.

Why the correct answer is A): AWS X-Ray provides automated, serverless, end-to-end tracing with latency visualization and bottleneck detection while requiring minimal code changes. Other options require manual effort, additional infrastructure, or cannot provide automated observability.

Question 171

A company runs multiple microservices on Amazon ECS Fargate and wants safe, automated canary deployments with traffic shifting, monitoring, and automatic rollback. Which solution is best?

A) ECS rolling updates with custom health check grace periods.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments integrated with ECS and ALB.

C) CloudFormation stack updates with rollback enabled.

D) ALB slow start mode for gradual traffic ramp-up.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) ECS rolling updates replace ECS tasks gradually to maintain service availability. Health check grace periods ensure that slow-starting containers are not marked unhealthy prematurely. While this approach helps maintain basic availability, ECS rolling updates do not provide automatic rollback based on runtime application metrics. There is also no mechanism for controlled traffic shifting between old and new versions; instead, tasks are replaced at the ECS service level without monitoring for application-level errors. Consequently, rolling updates are insufficient for mission-critical canary deployments that require risk management and automatic rollback capabilities.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments is a fully managed deployment orchestration tool integrated with ECS and ALB. It allows a new target group for updated ECS tasks to be created while the old tasks continue serving traffic. Traffic can then be incrementally shifted from the old target group to the new target group according to a defined schedule or percentage. ALB health checks and CloudWatch metrics continuously monitor the new tasks, and if errors occur, traffic is automatically rolled back to the previous version. CodeDeploy supports canary and linear deployment strategies, providing fine-grained control over rollout speed, monitoring, and automated rollback. This approach minimizes risk, ensures safe production deployments, and requires minimal operational intervention, making it the best choice for automated canary deployments.

C) CloudFormation stack updates provide rollback for infrastructure-level errors during template deployment. While they ensure resource-level consistency, CloudFormation does not monitor application-level health, control traffic shifting, or provide automated rollback based on performance metrics, limiting its ability to support canary deployments for ECS microservices.

D) ALB slow start mode gradually ramps up traffic to new targets to prevent overload, which can help reduce sudden traffic spikes. However, it does not orchestrate deployments, monitor application health, or automatically rollback failed updates. It only addresses traffic ramp-up and is insufficient as a complete canary deployment solution.

Why the correct answer is B): AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments provide a comprehensive, fully managed canary deployment strategy, including traffic shifting, monitoring, and automated rollback. Other options only address partial aspects of deployment management and cannot guarantee safe, automated production rollouts.

Question 172

A company stores high-volume logs in Amazon S3 and requires a serverless solution to extract structured fields, index data, and enable fast search queries. Which solution is best?

A) Deploy ELK stack on EC2.

B) Use S3 Select for querying logs.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless with S3 ingestion pipelines.

D) Store logs in DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes.

Answer: C)

Explanation

A) Deploying an ELK stack on EC2 allows full-featured log analytics with dashboards, aggregations, and full-text search. However, this approach requires manual provisioning, scaling, patching, and maintenance of EC2 instances, which violates the serverless requirement. Managing EC2 for high-volume logs introduces operational overhead, including capacity planning, updates, and monitoring, making it unsuitable for fully managed serverless log analytics.

B) S3 Select enables SQL-like queries on individual S3 objects. While useful for small ad hoc queries, it cannot index multiple objects or provide scalable full-text search. S3 Select lacks aggregation, automated structured field extraction, and visualization, making it impractical for enterprise-scale log analysis.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless provides a fully managed, serverless solution for log analytics. It integrates with S3 ingestion pipelines, automatically indexing incoming logs. Features include structured field extraction, full-text search, aggregation, and near real-time querying. OpenSearch Serverless scales automatically, requires no server management, and integrates with monitoring tools like CloudWatch. This solution satisfies all requirements: serverless operation, automated indexing, fast query performance, and minimal operational burden.

D) DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes provides low-latency lookups for structured data. However, it cannot efficiently handle unstructured logs or full-text search. Implementing log analytics using DynamoDB would require additional infrastructure, increasing complexity and operational cost.

Why the correct answer is C): OpenSearch Serverless delivers a scalable, serverless, fully managed log analytics solution capable of fast search, automated indexing, and minimal operational overhead. Other options either require servers or cannot provide full-text search at scale.

Question 173

A DevOps team wants to reduce AWS Lambda cold start latency for high-traffic functions while controlling costs for low-traffic functions. Which solution is best?

A) Enable Provisioned Concurrency for high-traffic functions.

B) Increase memory allocation for all Lambda functions.

C) Deploy Lambda functions in a VPC.

D) Replace Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Provisioned Concurrency pre-warms Lambda execution environments to eliminate cold starts. By applying it selectively to high-traffic functions, latency-sensitive endpoints remain responsive while low-traffic functions remain on-demand, controlling costs. Provisioned Concurrency is serverless-native, cost-effective, and precise, ensuring consistent performance without additional infrastructure. It can also scale automatically based on traffic, making it ideal for production-critical Lambda functions.

B) Increasing memory allocation improves CPU and initialization speed, which may slightly reduce cold start latency. However, it does not prevent cold starts entirely and increases costs for all functions, including low-traffic ones, making it less efficient than selective Provisioned Concurrency.

C) Deploying Lambda in a VPC historically increased cold start latency due to ENI attachment overhead. While improvements have mitigated some latency, VPC deployment does not eliminate cold starts and adds configuration complexity.

D) Replacing Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks avoids cold starts because containers are long-lived. However, this introduces operational overhead, including task management, scaling, monitoring, and always-on costs. It also violates the minimal code-change principle.

Why the correct answer is A): Provisioned Concurrency selectively pre-warms high-traffic Lambda functions, reducing cold start latency while controlling costs. Other options either fail to remove cold starts or increase operational complexity and expense.

Question 174

A company requires pre-deployment enforcement of compliance policies on Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Policies include mandatory tags, encryption, and restricted resource types. Violations must block deployment. Which solution is best?

A) AWS Config rules.

B) Sentinel policies in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise.

C) Git pre-commit hooks.

D) CloudFormation Guard.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) AWS Config rules operate after deployment, detecting noncompliance and optionally triggering remediation. While Config can ensure post-deployment compliance, it cannot prevent Terraform modules from being applied, making it reactive rather than proactive. This fails the pre-deployment enforcement requirement.

B) Sentinel policies provide policy-as-code enforcement in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise. Policies are evaluated during terraform plan or terraform apply. Violations fail the run, automatically blocking deployment. Sentinel supports enforcing mandatory tags, encryption, and restricted resource types. Integrated into CI/CD pipelines, Sentinel ensures pre-deployment governance, preventing noncompliant resources from reaching production. Fine-grained configuration allows flexibility across environments, providing enforceable guardrails without operational overhead.

C) Git pre-commit hooks enforce coding standards locally before code commits. They are bypassable and cannot reliably enforce policies in automated CI/CD pipelines, making them insufficient for pre-deployment compliance enforcement.

D) CloudFormation Guard validates CloudFormation templates. While effective for CloudFormation, it is not compatible with Terraform modules without conversion, adding complexity. It cannot natively enforce pre-deployment policies in Terraform pipelines.

Why the correct answer is B): Sentinel policies enforce pre-deployment compliance automatically, blocking noncompliant Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Other options are reactive, bypassable, or incompatible.

Question 175

A company wants end-to-end distributed tracing for serverless APIs including API Gateway, Lambda, DynamoDB, and S3, with minimal code changes, latency visualization, and bottleneck detection. Which solution is best?

A) Enable AWS X-Ray active tracing.

B) Use CloudWatch Logs Insights for manual correlation.

C) Deploy OpenTelemetry on EC2 instances.

D) Implement manual correlation IDs in code.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) AWS X-Ray active tracing provides fully managed distributed tracing for serverless applications. It automatically captures segments and subsegments for Lambda, API Gateway, DynamoDB, and S3. The service map visualizes latency, errors, and bottlenecks across services. Minimal code changes are required—enable active tracing on Lambda functions and optionally use the X-Ray SDK for custom subsegments. X-Ray scales automatically, integrates with CloudWatch dashboards, and provides near real-time observability. This satisfies all requirements: serverless integration, minimal code changes, latency visualization, and end-to-end tracing.

B) CloudWatch Logs Insights allows querying logs for latency and errors. Manual correlation is possible but requires significant effort, is error-prone, and does not provide automated service maps or bottleneck detection. It is impractical for production-scale tracing.

C) Deploying OpenTelemetry on EC2 introduces operational overhead. Each service requires instrumentation, and collectors must be deployed, scaled, and maintained. OpenTelemetry does not natively integrate with serverless AWS services, making it unsuitable for minimal-code solutions.

D) Implementing manual correlation IDs requires pervasive code changes. While helpful for debugging, it does not provide automated visualization, service maps, or bottleneck detection, and maintaining correlation across multiple services is error-prone.

Why the correct answer is A): AWS X-Ray provides automated, serverless, end-to-end tracing with latency visualization and bottleneck detection while requiring minimal code changes. Other options require manual effort, additional infrastructure, or cannot provide automated observability.

Question 176

A company runs multiple microservices on Amazon ECS Fargate and wants safe, automated canary deployments with traffic shifting, monitoring, and automatic rollback. Which solution is best?

A) ECS rolling updates with custom health check grace periods.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments integrated with ECS and ALB.

C) CloudFormation stack updates with rollback enabled.

D) ALB slow start mode for gradual traffic ramp-up.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) ECS rolling updates gradually replace tasks to maintain service availability. Health check grace periods ensure containers are not prematurely marked unhealthy. While useful for basic service continuity, ECS rolling updates lack the ability to perform controlled canary traffic shifting or automated rollback triggered by runtime metrics. They primarily manage ECS task lifecycle without monitoring application-level errors. For mission-critical services, this means failures can propagate to production before manual intervention, increasing risk during deployment.

B) AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments provides fully managed canary deployments integrated with ECS and ALB. A new target group is created for updated tasks, and traffic is shifted incrementally from the old group according to defined schedules or percentages. ALB health checks and CloudWatch metrics monitor the new tasks’ health, and CodeDeploy automatically rolls back traffic if errors are detected. Blue/green deployments support both linear and canary strategies, enabling safe, monitored, and reversible deployments with minimal operational effort. This approach reduces production risk and ensures predictable deployment outcomes, making it the best choice.

C) CloudFormation stack updates provide rollback only for infrastructure-level failures. CloudFormation cannot shift traffic incrementally or monitor application-level metrics, making it unsuitable for orchestrating canary deployments for ECS microservices. Rollbacks are triggered only if resource provisioning fails, not if the application performs poorly.

D) ALB slow start mode gradually ramps traffic to new targets to prevent overload. While it reduces sudden traffic spikes, it does not manage deployments, monitor application health, or perform automatic rollback. Slow start is a traffic ramp-up mechanism, not a deployment orchestration tool.

Why the correct answer is B): AWS CodeDeploy blue/green deployments provide complete canary deployment orchestration, including incremental traffic shifting, monitoring, and automatic rollback. Other options only address partial deployment concerns and cannot ensure safe, automated production rollouts.

Question 177

A company stores high-volume logs in Amazon S3 and requires a serverless solution to extract structured fields, index data, and enable fast search queries. Which solution is best?

A) Deploy ELK stack on EC2.

B) Use S3 Select for querying logs.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless with S3 ingestion pipelines.

D) Store logs in DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes.

Answer: C)

Explanation

A) Deploying an ELK stack on EC2 provides full-featured log analytics, including dashboards, aggregations, and full-text search. However, it requires manual provisioning, scaling, patching, and monitoring, which violates the serverless requirement. Operational overhead, capacity planning, and ongoing maintenance make EC2 unsuitable for fully managed serverless log analytics at scale.

B) S3 Select allows SQL-like queries on individual S3 objects. While useful for small ad hoc queries, it cannot index multiple objects or provide scalable full-text search across large datasets. S3 Select also lacks aggregation, automated structured field extraction, and visualization, making it impractical for enterprise-scale log analytics.

C) Amazon OpenSearch Serverless provides a fully managed, serverless log analytics solution. It integrates with S3 ingestion pipelines, automatically indexing incoming logs. Features include structured field extraction, full-text search, aggregation, and near real-time querying. OpenSearch Serverless scales automatically, requires no server management, and integrates with CloudWatch for monitoring and alerting. This solution satisfies all requirements: serverless operation, automated indexing, fast queries, and minimal operational burden.

D) DynamoDB with Global Secondary Indexes is designed for structured data lookups, but cannot efficiently handle unstructured logs or full-text search. Using DynamoDB for log analytics would require additional indexing infrastructure, increasing operational complexity and cost.

Why the correct answer is C): OpenSearch Serverless delivers a scalable, serverless, fully managed log analytics platform capable of automated indexing, full-text search, and minimal operational overhead. Other options either require servers or lack full-text search capabilities at scale.

Question 178

A DevOps team wants to reduce AWS Lambda cold start latency for high-traffic functions while controlling costs for low-traffic functions. Which solution is best?

A) Enable Provisioned Concurrency for high-traffic functions.

B) Increase memory allocation for all Lambda functions.

C) Deploy Lambda functions in a VPC.

D) Replace Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks.

Answer: A)

Explanation

A) Provisioned Concurrency pre-warms Lambda execution environments, effectively eliminating cold start latency. Applying it selectively to high-traffic functions ensures latency-sensitive endpoints remain responsive while low-traffic functions stay on-demand, controlling costs. Provisioned Concurrency is serverless-native, cost-efficient, and precise, providing consistent performance without additional infrastructure. It also scales automatically with traffic patterns, making it ideal for production-critical Lambda workloads.

B) Increasing memory allocation can improve CPU resources and slightly reduce cold start times. However, it does not prevent cold starts completely and increases cost for all functions, including low-traffic ones, making it less efficient than selective Provisioned Concurrency.

C) Deploying Lambda in a VPC historically increased cold start latency due to ENI attachment overhead. Although improvements have reduced this latency, VPC deployment does not eliminate cold starts and adds configuration complexity.

D) Replacing Lambda with ECS Fargate tasks avoids cold starts since containers are long-lived. However, this introduces operational overhead, including scaling, monitoring, and always-on costs, and violates the minimal code-change principle.

Why the correct answer is A): Provisioned Concurrency selectively pre-warms high-traffic Lambda functions, reducing cold start latency while controlling costs. Other options either fail to eliminate cold starts or increase operational complexity.

Question 179

A company requires pre-deployment enforcement of compliance policies on Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Policies include mandatory tags, encryption, and restricted resource types. Violations must block deployment. Which solution is best?

A) AWS Config rules.

B) Sentinel policies in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise.

C) Git pre-commit hooks.

D) CloudFormation Guard.

Answer: B)

Explanation

A) AWS Config rules operate after deployment, detecting noncompliance and optionally triggering remediation. While useful for post-deployment governance, Config cannot prevent Terraform modules from being applied, making it reactive rather than proactive. This does not satisfy the pre-deployment enforcement requirement.

B) Sentinel policies provide policy-as-code enforcement in Terraform Cloud/Enterprise. Policies are evaluated during terraform plan or terraform apply. Violations fail the run, automatically blocking deployment. Sentinel supports mandatory tags, encryption, and restricting resource types. Integrated into CI/CD pipelines, Sentinel ensures pre-deployment governance, preventing noncompliant resources from reaching production. Fine-grained policies allow flexible enforcement across different environments, providing operational safety without extra overhead.

C) Git pre-commit hooks enforce coding standards locally before committing code. They are bypassable and cannot reliably enforce policies in automated CI/CD pipelines, making them insufficient for pre-deployment compliance enforcement.

D) CloudFormation Guard validates CloudFormation templates. While effective for CloudFormation, it is not compatible with Terraform modules without conversion, adding complexity. It cannot enforce pre-deployment policies natively in Terraform pipelines.

Why the correct answer is B): Sentinel policies enforce pre-deployment compliance automatically, blocking noncompliant Terraform modules in CI/CD pipelines. Other options are reactive, bypassable, or incompatible.

Question 180

A company wants end-to-end distributed tracing for serverless APIs including API Gateway, Lambda, DynamoDB, and S3, with minimal code changes, latency visualization, and bottleneck detection. Which solution is best?

A) Enable AWS X-Ray active tracing.
B) Use CloudWatch Logs Insights for manual correlation.
C) Deploy OpenTelemetry on EC2 instances.
D) Implement manual correlation IDs in code.

Answer: A) Enable AWS X-Ray active tracing.

Explanation:

A) AWS X-Ray active tracing is a fully managed service designed for end-to-end observability of distributed applications, particularly in serverless environments. By enabling active tracing on services such as API Gateway, Lambda functions, DynamoDB, and S3, X-Ray automatically captures detailed segments and subsegments representing the operations performed by each service.

Segments correspond to the top-level service handling a request, such as a Lambda function invocation triggered by an API Gateway endpoint. Subsegments capture finer-grained operations, such as database queries in DynamoDB, object retrievals in S3, HTTP requests to external services, or downstream Lambda invocations. This hierarchical segmentation allows developers to see precisely where time is spent across all components involved in handling a request, making latency analysis and bottleneck detection straightforward.

The service map visualization is one of X-Ray’s most powerful features. It provides a graphical representation of all service interactions for a given application. Each node in the map represents a service, and each edge represents requests between services. Latency is color-coded, highlighting slow services or endpoints, while errors and faults are marked for quick identification. This visualization allows developers and operations teams to instantly identify performance bottlenecks, misconfigured services, or failing integrations, without having to manually sift through logs or correlate events across services.

Another critical advantage of X-Ray is that it requires minimal code changes. For Lambda functions, developers simply enable active tracing in the function configuration. Optionally, the X-Ray SDK can be used for additional instrumentation, such as adding custom annotations and metadata to trace specific variables or business logic events. This is especially useful when tracing application-specific workflows or monitoring user interactions, while still minimizing the need to modify existing code extensively. For API Gateway, enabling tracing at the stage level automatically propagates trace headers to all downstream services, including Lambda, S3, and DynamoDB.

X-Ray is also scalable and serverless-aware. It automatically handles high request volumes without requiring the deployment or management of tracing collectors. The service integrates seamlessly with Amazon CloudWatch, enabling near real-time dashboards that display latency, error rates, and request counts. This integration allows teams to combine metrics and tracing information, correlating system-level metrics with request-level traces, which is essential for comprehensive observability and operational efficiency.

B) CloudWatch Logs Insights provides advanced log querying capabilities and can be used to manually correlate request IDs across services. While this can provide some insights into latency and errors, it is labor-intensive, error-prone, and difficult to scale for production systems with high request volumes. Developers would need to manually parse and correlate log entries from multiple sources, construct custom queries, and potentially join disparate datasets to build even a rudimentary service map. CloudWatch Logs Insights does not provide automatic visualization of service interactions or latency breakdowns, nor does it highlight bottlenecks or errors in a graphical format. Therefore, it fails to meet the requirements for automated, minimal-code, end-to-end tracing.

C) OpenTelemetry can provide rich tracing capabilities but is designed for general-purpose observability across multiple deployment environments. Deploying OpenTelemetry on EC2 or containerized workloads requires manual instrumentation of each service, deployment of collectors, and maintenance of scaling infrastructure. While effective in traditional server-based applications, OpenTelemetry does not natively integrate with serverless AWS services like Lambda, API Gateway, DynamoDB, or S3. As a result, using OpenTelemetry for serverless architectures would require substantial custom work and operational overhead, making it unsuitable for minimal-code or production-ready serverless tracing.

D) Manual correlation IDs require pervasive code changes across all services to propagate identifiers for requests. While they can assist in debugging specific issues, manual correlation is prone to human error, difficult to maintain, and does not provide automated visualization, latency breakdowns, or bottleneck detection. Maintaining consistent correlation IDs across multiple services, especially in dynamic serverless environments with multiple asynchronous invocations, becomes cumbersome and error-prone, violating the requirement for minimal code changes and automated end-to-end observability.

Why the correct answer is A:AWS X-Ray is uniquely suited for serverless architectures because it provides:

End-to-end tracing across API Gateway, Lambda, DynamoDB, and S3, capturing all relevant segments and subsegments.

Automatic service maps with latency, error, and fault visualization for rapid bottleneck identification.

Minimal code changes, requiring only enabling active tracing and optional SDK instrumentation.

Near real-time observability integrated with CloudWatch dashboards.

Scalability and operational simplicity, as X-Ray is fully managed and serverless-aware.

Optional custom annotations and metadata for business-specific monitoring without modifying existing logic extensively.

Compared to CloudWatch Logs Insights, OpenTelemetry on EC2, or manual correlation IDs, X-Ray provides a complete, automated, and production-ready solution. It reduces operational burden, provides high-fidelity latency visualization, enables rapid debugging and performance tuning, and ensures end-to-end visibility for serverless APIs at scale.

In summary, AWS X-Ray active tracing satisfies all requirements—serverless integration, minimal code changes, latency visualization, bottleneck detection, scalability, and operational efficiency—making it the optimal solution for distributed tracing in serverless architectures.