Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate DEA-C01 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q141-160

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate DEA-C01 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 141:

You want to ingest streaming e-commerce transaction events, perform real-time aggregation, and feed dashboards for inventory and sales monitoring. Which architecture is best?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon OpenSearch Service
B) Amazon SQS + Amazon RDS
C) Amazon SNS + Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon EMR + Amazon S3

Answer: A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon OpenSearch Service

Explanation 

Option A, Amazon Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) + AWS Lambda + Amazon OpenSearch Service, provides a fully serverless, real-time analytics solution for transaction events, inventory management, and sales monitoring. Kinesis Data Streams serves as the ingestion layer, capable of capturing large volumes of high-frequency events from multiple sources in real time. Each stream is divided into shards, enabling parallel processing and ordered delivery, which allows multiple consumers to read the same data concurrently. This ensures that events are reliably ingested, durable, and processed in the correct sequence—critical for scenarios such as inventory tracking, point-of-sale updates, and financial transactions where ordering matters.

Once events are ingested into Kinesis, AWS Lambda functions serve as the processing layer. Lambda is serverless and scales automatically with the volume of incoming data, eliminating the need to provision or manage compute infrastructure. Lambda can perform real-time transformations, such as normalizing event data, filtering invalid transactions, aggregating metrics, and enriching events with metadata like product categories or store locations. It can also implement anomaly detection logic to flag suspicious or unexpected patterns in sales or inventory levels, enabling organizations to respond quickly to operational issues. Lambda ensures that streaming data is prepared for immediate consumption without introducing significant latency.

Processed events are then delivered to Amazon OpenSearch Service, a managed search and analytics engine that supports low-latency querying and visualization. OpenSearch is well-suited for operational analytics because it enables near-instant aggregation, search, and dashboarding through Kibana. Users can build live dashboards to monitor inventory levels, sales trends, or order anomalies in real time. OpenSearch scales automatically to handle increasing query loads and ingested data volumes, ensuring that operational teams always have immediate access to actionable insights. By combining Kinesis, Lambda, and OpenSearch, organizations can build a serverless, scalable pipeline that provides end-to-end streaming analytics, from ingestion to transformation to visualization.

In contrast, Option B, SQS + RDS, is an asynchronous architecture. While SQS provides a reliable message queue and RDS stores structured relational data, this combination is ill-suited for real-time analytics. SQS requires polling to retrieve messages, and inserting high-frequency events into RDS involves batching or repeated writes, introducing significant latency. Consequently, dashboards and operational analytics cannot reflect near-instant events, making it difficult to monitor inventory and sales in real time. Moreover, implementing real-time aggregation or anomaly detection in RDS requires custom application logic, further increasing operational complexity.

Option C, SNS + Redshift, supports event-driven batch pipelines but is primarily designed for structured, large-scale analytical workloads. Redshift excels at complex queries and reporting on historical data but is not optimized for high-frequency, low-latency ingestion or real-time aggregation. Even with micro-batch loading, there is inherent delay between event generation and availability for queries, making it unsuitable for operational dashboards that require immediate updates. Redshift also requires provisioning and cluster management, adding operational overhead compared to serverless alternatives.

Option D, EMR + S3, is designed for batch processing and large-scale analytics. EMR clusters need to be provisioned and maintained, and S3, while highly durable, is not optimized for frequent writes or low-latency access. Consequently, EMR + S3 pipelines are unsuitable for operational dashboards or real-time monitoring, as processing and query latency prevent instant insight into transactions, inventory levels, or sales trends.

In practice, Kinesis Data Streams + Lambda + OpenSearch enables organizations to ingest, process, and analyze transaction events in near real time. Teams can build live dashboards, detect anomalies, generate alerts, and respond to operational issues immediately. The serverless architecture automatically scales to handle fluctuating workloads, reducing operational overhead and infrastructure management. By combining high-throughput ingestion, real-time processing, and low-latency querying, this architecture aligns with AWS best practices for streaming analytics, providing a robust, scalable, and maintainable solution for monitoring inventory, sales, and other operational metrics.

Question 142:

You need to catalog S3 datasets automatically for use with Athena and Redshift Spectrum. Which service is best?

A) AWS Glue
B) Amazon EMR
C) Amazon RDS
D) Amazon Redshift

Answer: A) AWS Glue

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Glue, is a fully managed, serverless ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) and data catalog service designed to simplify data preparation, transformation, and metadata management in modern cloud-based analytics workflows. One of Glue’s core strengths is its ability to automatically discover datasets stored in Amazon S3 through Glue Crawlers. Crawlers can scan S3 buckets, detect new datasets, infer their schema, and update the Glue Data Catalog in real time. This ensures that data is immediately queryable using services such as Amazon Athena or Redshift Spectrum without requiring manual schema definitions or ETL interventions. By providing a centralized, up-to-date metadata repository, Glue reduces operational overhead, ensures consistency across datasets, and accelerates time-to-insight in dynamic data lake environments where datasets frequently evolve.

Glue supports a wide variety of data formats. For structured datasets, such as CSV, Parquet, and ORC, Glue can directly infer column names, types, and partitions. For semi-structured datasets, including JSON and Avro, Glue can handle nested structures, infer complex schemas, and normalize them for analysis. This flexibility is critical for modern analytics environments where data originates from diverse sources, including application logs, IoT devices, transactional systems, and third-party feeds. Glue’s ability to handle both structured and semi-structured formats allows organizations to build scalable, unified data lakes without worrying about preprocessing or schema inconsistencies.

ETL Jobs in Glue enable automated data transformation and preparation. Developers can create jobs in Python or Scala or use Glue Studio, a visual interface for building ETL workflows without writing code. Jobs can filter, clean, normalize, enrich, and aggregate data before it is queried or loaded into analytics platforms. For example, raw JSON logs from IoT devices can be flattened into relational tables, missing or inconsistent values can be standardized, and derived metrics can be calculated during the ETL process. Glue also supports job scheduling, orchestration, and dependency management, allowing organizations to automate recurring workflows, event-driven pipelines, or complex ETL sequences. This ensures that datasets are consistently curated, reliable, and ready for analytics without requiring manual intervention.

In comparison, Option B, Amazon EMR, is a distributed data processing platform designed for large-scale batch processing with frameworks such as Apache Spark, Hive, and Presto. While EMR can process massive datasets efficiently, it does not provide automated cataloging or schema inference. Metadata management requires manual Hive metastore configuration or integration with Glue, which adds operational complexity. EMR clusters also need to be provisioned, scaled, and maintained, increasing overhead and requiring expertise in cluster management and distributed computing. For organizations seeking serverless, automated ETL and cataloging, EMR introduces unnecessary operational burden.

Option C, Amazon RDS, is a managed relational database optimized for transactional workloads (OLTP). While RDS is excellent for structured data storage, it cannot automatically detect, catalog, or query datasets stored in S3. New datasets must be manually loaded, and schema updates require human intervention, making RDS unsuitable for dynamic, large-scale data lakes or for scenarios where datasets are frequently updated. RDS also lacks built-in ETL and transformation capabilities for handling semi-structured or nested data formats.

Option D, Amazon Redshift, is a data warehouse designed for analytical queries over structured datasets. Redshift can query external S3 datasets using Redshift Spectrum, which extends its query engine to access data outside the cluster. However, Redshift does not automatically detect new datasets or schema changes in S3. Manual schema updates or integration with Glue are required to ensure that queries run correctly. While Redshift provides high-performance analytics, it does not eliminate operational overhead for schema management or enable immediate, serverless query capabilities on newly added datasets without Glue integration.

In practice, AWS Glue is the recommended solution for automated, serverless ETL and data cataloging. Glue minimizes operational complexity, ensures metadata consistency, and allows analysts to query new datasets immediately. Its serverless architecture scales automatically with data volume, handling datasets from megabytes to petabytes without requiring manual provisioning. By integrating seamlessly with Athena for ad-hoc querying and Redshift Spectrum for large-scale analytics, Glue enables dynamic, flexible, and fully managed data lake workflows. Organizations can implement agile, self-service analytics, where datasets are continuously discovered, curated, and made query-ready, without the operational burden of managing ETL clusters, manual schema updates, or metadata repositories.

In summary, AWS Glue provides automated schema discovery, ETL transformation capabilities, and a serverless, scalable catalog for S3 datasets. Compared to EMR, RDS, and Redshift alone, Glue reduces operational effort, accelerates time-to-insight, and enables immediate, consistent access to new and evolving datasets. This makes it the preferred solution for modern cloud-based data lakes and analytics pipelines.

Question 143:

You want to orchestrate ETL workflows with conditional branching, parallel execution, and retries. Which service is most suitable?

A) AWS Step Functions
B) AWS Glue
C) Amazon EMR
D) Amazon Data Pipeline

Answer: A) AWS Step Functions

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Step Functions, is a fully managed, serverless orchestration service that enables organizations to coordinate tasks across multiple AWS services reliably and at scale. Step Functions allows developers to design ETL workflows as a series of steps, supporting sequential, parallel, and conditional execution, which is critical for complex data processing pipelines. Each step in the workflow maintains state, execution history, and context, which allows for automated retries, error handling, and conditional branching. This ensures that ETL pipelines can run reliably even in the event of transient failures, data errors, or changing business requirements.

One of the core advantages of Step Functions is its integration with other AWS services. It seamlessly orchestrates AWS Glue for ETL jobs, Lambda for lightweight processing and transformations, EMR for large-scale batch analytics, Redshift for data warehousing, and other services such as S3, DynamoDB, SNS, and SQS. This tight integration allows organizations to build end-to-end ETL pipelines without relying on external scheduling tools or custom scripts. Developers can define workflows visually using the Step Functions console, which simplifies pipeline design, debugging, and optimization. Visual monitoring provides insights into execution progress, durations, and failure points, enabling rapid troubleshooting and performance tuning.

Step Functions also provides robust error handling and retry mechanisms. Each task can be configured with custom retry policies, including exponential backoff, and catch blocks allow workflows to gracefully handle failures without stopping the entire pipeline. Conditional branching enables workflows to make decisions based on runtime data or validation results, executing different processing paths when required. Parallel execution allows multiple tasks to run simultaneously, reducing total execution time and enabling scalable processing of large datasets. These features make Step Functions particularly effective for dynamic ETL pipelines that must adapt to varying workloads and data volumes.

In contrast, Option B, AWS Glue, while providing ETL and basic workflow chaining capabilities, lacks the advanced orchestration features of Step Functions. Glue allows sequential job chaining and scheduling, but it does not natively support complex conditional logic, parallel branching, or sophisticated error handling. Workflows that require dynamic decision-making or multi-service orchestration would need additional custom scripts or external services, increasing operational complexity.

Option C, Amazon EMR, is a powerful distributed data processing platform for batch analytics using frameworks such as Apache Spark, Hive, and Presto. EMR excels at transforming large datasets at scale but does not provide native workflow orchestration. To sequence tasks, manage dependencies, handle retries, or implement conditional logic, organizations must rely on external scripts, cron jobs, or additional orchestration layers. This adds operational overhead and increases the risk of errors in complex ETL pipelines, especially in environments with evolving data or dynamic workflows.

Option D, AWS Data Pipeline, is a legacy orchestration service that supports basic scheduling and data movement tasks. However, it is not fully serverless, requires manual resource provisioning, and has limited parallelism and error-handling capabilities compared to Step Functions. Monitoring and debugging are less intuitive, and the service lacks modern integration features, making it less suitable for building flexible, scalable, and maintainable ETL workflows in today’s cloud-native data architectures.

In practice, Step Functions is the recommended solution for orchestrating ETL pipelines because it combines serverless scalability, deep service integration, visual workflow design, and robust error-handling mechanisms. Organizations can automate complex ETL workflows, ensure reliability and reproducibility, and reduce operational overhead, all without managing servers or infrastructure. Step Functions enables pipelines to handle dynamic data volumes, implement real-time decision logic, and coordinate multiple AWS services seamlessly, making it ideal for both batch and near-real-time ETL processing.

In summary, AWS Step Functions provides a modern, serverless approach to orchestrating ETL pipelines that is superior to Glue, EMR, and Data Pipeline for complex workflows. Its ability to manage sequencing, parallelism, conditional logic, error handling, and retries while integrating with the broader AWS ecosystem ensures robust, maintainable, and scalable ETL operations, enabling organizations to focus on analytics and insights rather than pipeline management.

Question 144:

You want to query S3 datasets using SQL without provisioning infrastructure, paying only for the data scanned. Which service is best?

A) Amazon Athena
B) Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A) Amazon Athena

Explanation 

Option A, Amazon Athena, is a fully managed, serverless SQL query service that enables users to analyze data stored in Amazon S3 without the need to provision or manage any infrastructure. Athena allows analysts, data engineers, and data scientists to run ad-hoc queries on both structured and semi-structured datasets using standard SQL syntax. It natively supports a wide variety of data formats, including structured formats such as CSV, Parquet, and ORC, and semi-structured formats such as JSON and Avro. This flexibility is particularly important in modern data lake architectures, where datasets can come from multiple sources and may evolve over time, often containing nested or complex structures.

One of Athena’s key strengths is its tight integration with the AWS Glue Data Catalog. Glue crawlers automatically discover datasets in S3, infer schemas, and populate the Glue Data Catalog. This integration enables Athena to immediately query newly added or updated datasets without any manual schema management. Analysts can start querying data as soon as it is ingested, accelerating time-to-insight and supporting agile exploration of large, dynamic data lakes. This is particularly valuable in environments where data arrives continuously, such as IoT telemetry, web clickstreams, or application logs.

Athena is serverless and fully managed, which means users do not need to provision clusters, manage scaling, or tune infrastructure. This reduces operational overhead and allows organizations to focus entirely on data analysis and insight generation. Athena is also pay-per-query, meaning customers are charged based on the amount of data scanned per query. This cost model is extremely efficient for ad-hoc analysis, exploratory querying, and intermittent analytics workloads, as organizations only pay for what they use rather than maintaining idle clusters or paying for reserved resources. Additionally, Athena’s query engine is optimized for parallel execution across large datasets in S3, providing fast performance without the need for pre-partitioning or indexing, although partitioning and columnar formats like Parquet or ORC can further improve efficiency and reduce query costs.

In comparison, Option B, Amazon Redshift, is a fully managed, columnar data warehouse designed for structured, high-performance analytics over large datasets. Redshift provides excellent query performance and concurrency for predictable workloads, especially when dealing with highly relational or aggregated data. It also supports Redshift Spectrum, which allows querying S3 datasets directly. However, Redshift requires cluster provisioning, sizing, and ongoing maintenance, including scaling, vacuuming, and workload optimization. While Spectrum extends Redshift’s reach into S3, Athena remains a simpler, serverless solution for ad-hoc, exploratory queries. Redshift’s architecture is more suitable for high-performance analytical workloads over structured data and pre-defined schemas, rather than flexible, immediate exploration of dynamic, semi-structured data in a serverless manner.

Option C, Amazon EMR, allows querying S3 datasets using frameworks such as Apache Spark or Hive. While EMR is highly capable for large-scale distributed data processing, it requires cluster provisioning, configuration, and management. This introduces latency for query execution and adds operational complexity. EMR is typically optimized for batch analytics or long-running ETL jobs, not for rapid, interactive, ad-hoc queries. Users must manage cluster scaling, monitor health, and handle resource allocation, which increases operational overhead compared to Athena’s serverless, pay-per-query model. EMR is better suited for scenarios where large-scale transformations, machine learning preprocessing, or heavy batch processing are required, rather than instant querying and exploration of S3 datasets.

Option D, AWS Glue, is primarily an ETL and data cataloging service. Glue is excellent for preparing and transforming datasets, cleaning data, and maintaining consistent metadata in the Glue Data Catalog. However, Glue is not designed for direct ad-hoc SQL querying. To query data in Glue, one typically needs to either run an ETL job to transform or load data into another analytics service (such as Redshift or Athena) or use Glue Studio to prepare datasets. This extra step introduces latency and operational complexity, making it less suitable for immediate exploration or dashboarding compared to Athena. Glue is best leveraged in conjunction with Athena to ensure that datasets are clean, structured, and query-ready.

In practice, Amazon Athena provides a highly cost-efficient, scalable, and flexible solution for querying datasets in S3. Its serverless architecture, pay-per-query pricing, and support for a wide range of data formats make it ideal for ad-hoc queries, data exploration, and dashboard integration. Organizations can quickly generate insights from raw or semi-structured data, build operational dashboards, or perform iterative analysis without worrying about infrastructure management. Athena enables analysts to run queries directly against live datasets in S3, supporting immediate visibility into business metrics, IoT data streams, clickstream logs, and other continuously updated sources.

Moreover, Athena integrates seamlessly with visualization and BI tools such as Amazon QuickSight, enabling real-time dashboards and reporting. Analysts can also combine Athena queries with serverless data pipelines using AWS Lambda, Glue ETL jobs, and Step Functions to automate analytics workflows without manual intervention. Athena’s ability to query new datasets instantly, combined with serverless scalability, ensures that organizations can maintain agility, reduce operational effort, and respond to business needs quickly.

In summary, Amazon Athena is the preferred solution for querying S3 datasets due to its serverless architecture, pay-per-query pricing, seamless Glue integration, and support for structured and semi-structured data. Compared to Redshift, EMR, and Glue alone, Athena provides the fastest, most flexible, and cost-effective method for ad-hoc analytics, data exploration, and dashboarding. Its ability to deliver immediate insights without infrastructure management or ETL delays makes it the optimal choice for modern, dynamic, and scalable data lake environments.

Question 145:

You want to store IoT time-series data efficiently and perform trend analysis and anomaly detection. Which service is most suitable?

A) Amazon Timestream
B) Amazon DynamoDB
C) Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon RDS

Answer: A) Amazon Timestream

Explanation 

Option A, Amazon Timestream, is a serverless time-series database designed for IoT and telemetry workloads. It automatically manages tiered storage, retention policies, and compression, separating hot and cold data to reduce cost. Timestream supports native time-series query functions, including aggregation, smoothing, interpolation, and trend detection. It scales automatically to handle millions of events per second, providing low-latency dashboards and operational monitoring.

Option B, DynamoDB, is a key-value store that can store IoT data, but lacks native time-series analytics, requiring additional ETL or indexes for trend detection.

Option C, Redshift, is optimized for batch analytics. Continuous high-frequency ingestion requires ETL pipelines and cluster management, introducing latency and operational overhead.

Option D, RDS, is transactional and not suitable for high-frequency time-series workloads or real-time trend analysis.

In practice, Amazon Timestream is a fully managed, serverless, purpose-built time-series database optimized for collecting, storing, and analyzing high-frequency telemetry and IoT data. It is designed to handle massive volumes of time-stamped data generated by sensors, applications, and connected devices, providing both high ingestion throughput and low-latency querying. Unlike traditional relational databases, Timestream automatically manages the complexities of time-series workloads, such as tiered storage, data retention, and query optimization, allowing developers and analysts to focus on insights rather than infrastructure management.

One of the key benefits of Timestream is its serverless architecture, which removes the need for provisioning, scaling, or managing database servers. It automatically scales storage and compute resources based on the volume and velocity of incoming telemetry data, ensuring consistent performance even as IoT workloads grow. This is particularly important in IoT environments, where the number of connected devices and the frequency of events can fluctuate significantly. By eliminating the operational overhead of database management, Timestream allows organizations to build agile, scalable, and cost-efficient pipelines for real-time monitoring and analytics.

Timestream also provides cost-efficient storage management through its built-in tiered storage model. Recent, frequently accessed data is stored in memory-optimized “hot” storage for low-latency queries, while older historical data is automatically moved to cost-optimized “magnetic” storage. This ensures that organizations can retain vast amounts of telemetry data for trend analysis, regulatory compliance, or historical reporting without incurring excessive costs. The automatic data lifecycle management reduces manual intervention and simplifies long-term analytics planning.

From an analytics perspective, Timestream offers native time-series functions, including aggregations, interpolation, smoothing, trend detection, and anomaly detection. Users can compute moving averages, detect sudden spikes or drops, and analyze patterns over multiple time windows with simple SQL queries. This is critical for IoT scenarios where rapid identification of anomalies, equipment failures, or operational inefficiencies can prevent downtime, reduce costs, and improve user experiences. By combining ingestion, storage, and analysis in a single platform, Timestream enables real-time operational insights without requiring separate ETL or preprocessing pipelines.

Timestream also integrates seamlessly with popular visualization and analytics tools, such as Amazon QuickSight and Grafana. This allows organizations to create interactive dashboards that reflect real-time trends, sensor readings, and aggregated metrics, providing operational teams, product managers, or executives with immediate visibility into system performance. Alerts and notifications can be configured based on thresholds or anomalies detected in the time-series data, enabling automated responses or proactive interventions.

Compared to traditional relational databases or generic NoSQL solutions, Timestream is specifically optimized for the unique characteristics of time-series and IoT workloads. Relational databases often require manual schema design, indexing, and partitioning to handle time-stamped data efficiently, while NoSQL databases may not provide built-in aggregation or time-window functions. Timestream simplifies these challenges by offering a purpose-built query engine that understands time-series semantics and automatically optimizes data storage and retrieval.

In modern IoT pipelines, Timestream can serve as the central repository for telemetry data collected from devices, sensors, or applications. It can ingest millions of events per second from sources such as Kinesis Data Streams, AWS IoT Core, or Lambda functions, and store them in a query-ready format. Real-time dashboards can display device health, operational metrics, or performance trends, while historical queries enable predictive analytics, trend forecasting, and anomaly pattern analysis. This unified approach reduces latency, operational complexity, and costs while providing actionable insights across the organization.

Question 146:

You want to stream social media feeds, perform real-time sentiment analysis, and feed dashboards. Which architecture is best?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon OpenSearch Service
B) Amazon SQS + Amazon RDS
C) Amazon SNS + Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon EMR + Amazon S3

Answer: A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon OpenSearch Service

Explanation 

Option A, KDS + Lambda + OpenSearch, supports real-time ingestion and analysis of streaming social media feeds. KDS provides high-throughput, durable, ordered ingestion. Lambda functions can process streams in real time, performing sentiment analysis, filtering, and enrichment. OpenSearch enables low-latency dashboards, searches, and visualizations. This architecture ensures scalable, serverless processing, immediate insights, and operational alerts.

Option B, SQS + RDS, is asynchronous. Real-time analytics is difficult due to latency from polling and batch inserts, unsuitable for dashboards requiring live updates.

Option C, SNS + Redshift, is designed for batch processing. Redshift is optimized for structured analytics, not real-time streaming, introducing delays.

Option D, EMR + S3, is suitable for batch processing. Cluster provisioning and S3 write latency prevent low-latency real-time sentiment dashboards.

In practice, KDS + Lambda + OpenSearch allows organizations to analyze social media feeds in real time, generate dashboards, detect trends, and automate alerts, aligning with serverless best practices for streaming analytics.

Question 147:

You need to catalog S3 datasets automatically for analytics in Athena and Redshift Spectrum. Which service is best?

A) AWS Glue
B) Amazon EMR
C) Amazon RDS
D) Amazon Redshift

Answer: A) AWS Glue

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Glue, automates schema discovery and cataloging of S3 datasets. Glue crawlers scan S3, detect formats, infer schemas, and populate the Glue Data Catalog, enabling immediate queries via Athena and Redshift Spectrum. Glue ETL jobs allow data cleaning and enrichment, ensuring analytics-ready datasets.

Option B, EMR, is for batch processing. It cannot automatically catalog data; manual Hive metastore management or Glue integration is required.

Option C, RDS, cannot detect or catalog S3 datasets.

Option D, Redshift, can query S3 via Spectrum but cannot automatically discover new datasets, requiring manual schema updates.

In practice, AWS Glue ensures serverless, automated cataloging, reducing operational effort and enabling immediate data exploration in Athena and Redshift Spectrum.

Question 148:

You want to orchestrate ETL pipelines with conditional branching, retries, and parallel execution. Which service is most suitable?

A) AWS Step Functions
B) AWS Glue
C) Amazon EMR
D) Amazon Data Pipeline

Answer: A) AWS Step Functions

Explanation 

Option A, Step Functions, is serverless and provides conditional execution, parallelism, integrated retries, and error handling. It integrates with Lambda, Glue, EMR, and Redshift. Visual workflow monitoring ensures pipelines are reliable and maintainable.

Option B, Glue, provides basic workflow chaining but cannot handle complex conditional or parallel execution.

Option C, EMR, does not natively orchestrate workflows; external scripts are needed.

Option D, Data Pipeline, is a legacy service with limited parallelism and error handling, less suitable for modern ETL orchestration.

In practice, Step Functions is ideal for scalable, robust ETL orchestration with minimal operational overhead.

Question 149:

You want to query S3 datasets using SQL without managing servers and pay only for the data scanned. Which service is best?

A) Amazon Athena
B) Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A) Amazon Athena

Explanation 

Option A, Athena, is a serverless SQL query service for S3 datasets. It integrates with the Glue Data Catalog for automatic schema discovery. Athena is pay-per-query, eliminating cluster management. Analysts can perform ad-hoc queries, dashboards, and exploration instantly.

Option B, Redshift, requires cluster provisioning and is less flexible for ad-hoc queries.

Option C, EMR, requires cluster management, introducing latency.

Option D, Glue, cannot directly perform ad-hoc SQL queries without ETL jobs, adding complexity.

Athena is the most cost-efficient, serverless, and scalable solution for querying S3 datasets.

Question 150:

You want to store IoT time-series data efficiently and perform real-time trend analysis and anomaly detection. Which service is best?

A) Amazon Timestream
B) Amazon DynamoDB
C) Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon RDS

Answer: A) Amazon Timestream

Explanation 

Option A, Timestream, is a serverless time-series database optimized for IoT. It manages tiered storage, retention, and compression, and provides native time-series functions for aggregation, smoothing, and trend detection. It supports low-latency dashboards and scales automatically for millions of events per second.

Option B, DynamoDB, lacks native time-series query functions.

Option C, Redshift, is for batch analytics; continuous ingestion adds latency.

Option D, RDS, is transactional and not suitable for high-frequency time-series workloads.

Timestream is the ideal solution for serverless, scalable IoT telemetry and time-series analytics, supporting real-time dashboards, anomaly detection, and visualization.

Question 151:

You want to ingest high-volume financial transaction streams, perform real-time fraud detection, and feed dashboards for monitoring. Which architecture is best?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon OpenSearch Service
B) Amazon SQS + Amazon RDS
C) Amazon SNS + Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon EMR + Amazon S3

Answer: A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon OpenSearch Service

Explanation 

Option A, Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) + Lambda + OpenSearch, is ideal for real-time ingestion and analysis of high-volume transaction streams. KDS provides durable, ordered streaming ingestion, supporting millions of events per second with multiple consumers. Lambda allows serverless processing, enabling transformations, filtering, and real-time fraud detection. OpenSearch enables low-latency dashboards, search, and visualizations with Kibana, providing immediate operational insights and alerts. This architecture is highly scalable, fault-tolerant, and fully serverless, reducing operational overhead.

Option B, SQS + RDS, introduces latency due to asynchronous processing and batch inserts. Real-time fraud detection is difficult because RDS is optimized for transactional storage, not streaming analytics.

Option C, SNS + Redshift, is designed for batch analytics. Redshift is suitable for structured, historical analysis but cannot provide low-latency, real-time dashboards.

Option D, EMR + S3, is optimized for batch processing. EMR clusters require provisioning, and S3 has high write latency, making it unsuitable for sub-second analytics and dashboards.

In practice, KDS + Lambda + OpenSearch enables organizations to detect fraudulent activity in real time, monitor transactions instantly, and provide dashboards for operational decisions, aligning with AWS best practices for real-time streaming analytics.

Question 152:

You want to automatically catalog datasets in S3 for use with Athena and Redshift Spectrum. Which service is best?

A) AWS Glue
B) Amazon EMR
C) Amazon RDS
D) Amazon Redshift

Answer: A) AWS Glue

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Glue, is a serverless ETL and data catalog service. Glue crawlers scan S3 datasets, detect schema changes, and populate the Glue Data Catalog, enabling immediate queries with Athena and Redshift Spectrum. It supports structured formats (CSV, Parquet, ORC) and semi-structured formats (JSON, Avro). Glue ETL jobs allow data cleaning, enrichment, and transformation, producing analytics-ready datasets. Glue ensures metadata consistency and reduces manual schema management for dynamic data lakes.

Option B, EMR, is excellent for large-scale processing using Spark or Hive, but does not automatically catalog new datasets. Manual Hive metastore management or integration with Glue is required, increasing operational overhead.

Option C, RDS, is transactional and cannot detect or catalog S3 datasets.

Option D, Redshift, can query external S3 datasets using Spectrum, but cannot automatically detect new datasets. Manual schema updates or Glue integration is needed.

In practice, AWS Glue provides automated, serverless cataloging, reducing operational effort and enabling immediate queries for analysts. Its scalability and integration make it ideal for modern data lake architectures.

Question 153:

You want to orchestrate ETL workflows with conditional execution, parallel tasks, and retries. Which service is most suitable?

A) AWS Step Functions
B) AWS Glue
C) Amazon EMR
D) Amazon Data Pipeline

Answer: A) AWS Step Functions

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Step Functions, is a serverless orchestration service for coordinating workflows across AWS services. It supports sequential, parallel, and conditional execution, integrated retries, and error handling. Step Functions integrates with Lambda, Glue, EMR, and Redshift, enabling complex ETL pipelines to execute reliably. Visual workflow monitoring allows debugging, optimization, and state tracking.

Option B, Glue, provides ETL and basic workflow chaining but cannot handle advanced conditional logic or parallel execution.

Option C, EMR, is optimized for batch analytics but does not natively orchestrate workflows. External scripts are required for sequencing, retry handling, and dependencies.

Option D, Data Pipeline, is a legacy service with limited parallelism and monitoring, not fully serverless, making it less suitable for modern ETL orchestration.

In practice, Step Functions enables organizations to orchestrate robust, scalable, and maintainable ETL pipelines, integrating seamlessly with AWS services and reducing operational complexity.

Question 154:

You want to query S3 datasets using SQL without provisioning infrastructure and pay only for the data scanned. Which service is best?

A) Amazon Athena
B) Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A) Amazon Athena

Explanation 

Option A, Athena, is a serverless SQL query service that queries S3 datasets directly. It supports structured (CSV, Parquet) and semi-structured (JSON, ORC, Avro) formats. Integration with Glue Data Catalog enables automatic schema discovery and immediate querying. Athena is pay-per-query, eliminating the need to provision clusters or servers. Analysts can perform ad-hoc queries, generate dashboards, and explore data lakes instantly.

Option B, Redshift, requires cluster provisioning. Redshift Spectrum allows external queries but is less flexible and adds operational overhead.

Option C, EMR, allows querying S3 with Spark SQL or Hive but requires cluster provisioning and management, introducing latency.

Option D, Glue, is primarily an ETL service and cannot perform direct ad-hoc SQL queries without moving data, adding complexity.

In practice, Athena provides a serverless, cost-efficient, and scalable solution for querying S3 datasets, supporting ad-hoc analytics, dashboards, and exploration without infrastructure management.

Question 155:

You want to store IoT time-series data efficiently and perform real-time trend analysis. Which service is most suitable?

A) Amazon Timestream
B) Amazon DynamoDB
C) Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon RDS

Answer: A) Amazon Timestream

Explanation 

Option A, Timestream, is a serverless time-series database optimized for IoT and telemetry workloads. It automatically handles tiered storage, retention, and compression, separating hot and cold data for cost efficiency. Timestream provides native time-series functions, including aggregation, interpolation, smoothing, and trend analysis, enabling real-time dashboards and anomaly detection. It scales automatically to handle millions of events per second.

Option B, DynamoDB, is a key-value store and lacks native time-series query capabilities, requiring additional ETL or indexing for trend analysis.

Option C, Redshift, is designed for batch analytics; continuous ingestion introduces latency.

Option D, RDS, is transactional and not suitable for high-frequency time-series workloads or real-time trend detection.

In practice, Timestream provides a serverless, scalable, and cost-efficient platform for IoT telemetry, supporting real-time dashboards, anomaly detection, and visualization integration.

Question 156:

You want to ingest streaming IoT telemetry, perform real-time anomaly detection, and feed dashboards. Which architecture is best?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon Timestream
B) Amazon SQS + Amazon RDS
C) Amazon SNS + Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon EMR + Amazon S3

Answer: A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams + AWS Lambda + Amazon Timestream

Explanation 

Option A, KDS + Lambda + Timestream, provides real-time ingestion, processing, and storage for IoT telemetry. KDS ensures durable, ordered streams, Lambda allows real-time processing and anomaly detection, and Timestream stores data efficiently with time-series query capabilities. Dashboards can reflect near-instant analytics, and alerts can be automated. Serverless architecture reduces operational overhead and scales automatically.

Option B, SQS + RDS, introduces latency due to asynchronous processing and is not suitable for real-time anomaly detection.

Option C, SNS + Redshift, is batch-oriented and cannot provide low-latency dashboards.

Option D, EMR + S3, is optimized for batch processing, making it unsuitable for real-time telemetry monitoring.

In practice, KDS + Lambda + Timestream is the recommended architecture for IoT streaming and real-time analytics, supporting operational dashboards and alerts efficiently.

Question 157:

You want to catalog S3 datasets automatically for use in Athena and Redshift Spectrum. Which service is best?

A) AWS Glue
B) Amazon EMR
C) Amazon RDS
D) Amazon Redshift

Answer: A) AWS Glue

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Glue, automates schema discovery and cataloging of S3 datasets. Glue crawlers detect new datasets, infer schemas, and populate the Glue Data Catalog, making them immediately queryable via Athena and Redshift Spectrum. ETL jobs can transform and enrich data, producing analytics-ready datasets.

Option B, EMR, cannot automatically catalog datasets; manual Hive metastore management is needed.

Option C, RDS, cannot detect or catalog S3 datasets.

Option D, Redshift, requires manual schema updates for new S3 datasets, making Glue the preferred choice.

In practice, Glue ensures serverless, automated cataloging, reducing operational effort and enabling instant analytics for dynamic S3 data lakes.

Question 158:

You want to orchestrate ETL pipelines with conditional branching, retries, and parallel execution. Which service is most suitable?

A) AWS Step Functions
B) AWS Glue
C) Amazon EMR
D) Amazon Data Pipeline

Answer: A) AWS Step Functions

Explanation 

Option A, Step Functions, is serverless and supports conditional execution, parallelism, retries, and error handling. Integrates with Lambda, Glue, EMR, and Redshift. Visual workflow monitoring ensures reliable, maintainable ETL pipelines.

Option B, Glue, provides basic workflows but lacks advanced conditional logic and parallel execution.

Option C, EMR, does not natively orchestrate workflows; external scripts are needed.

Option D, Data Pipeline, is legacy with limited parallelism and error handling.

Step Functions is the ideal choice for scalable, robust ETL orchestration with minimal operational overhead.

Question 159:

You want to query S3 datasets using SQL without managing servers, paying only for the data scanned. Which service is best?

A) Amazon Athena
B) Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A) Amazon Athena

Explanation 

Option A, Athena, is serverless and queries S3 datasets directly. Supports structured and semi-structured formats. Integration with Glue Data Catalog enables automatic schema discovery. Athena is pay-per-query, eliminating infrastructure costs. Analysts can perform ad-hoc queries, dashboards, and exploration instantly.

Option B, Redshift, requires cluster provisioning and is less flexible for ad-hoc queries.

Option C, EMR, requires cluster management, adding latency.

Option D, Glue, cannot directly perform ad-hoc queries without ETL jobs.

Athena is cost-efficient, serverless, and scalable, ideal for S3 analytics.

Question 160:

You want to store IoT time-series data efficiently and perform real-time trend analysis and anomaly detection. Which service is best?

A) Amazon Timestream
B) Amazon DynamoDB
C) Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon RDS

Answer: A) Amazon Timestream

Explanation 

Option A, Timestream, is a serverless time-series database optimized for IoT. Manages tiered storage, retention, compression, and provides native time-series functions for aggregation, smoothing, and trend detection. Supports low-latency dashboards and scales automatically for millions of events per second.

Option B, DynamoDB, lacks native time-series functions.

Option C, Redshift, is batch-oriented; continuous ingestion adds latency.

Option D, RDS, is transactional and unsuitable for high-frequency time-series workloads.

Timestream is the ideal solution for serverless, scalable IoT telemetry, supporting real-time dashboards, anomaly detection, and visualization.