Amazon  AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer – Associate MLA-C01   Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 8 Q 141- 160

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning Engineer – Associate MLA-C01 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 141

A retail company wants to implement dynamic pricing using historical sales data, competitor pricing, and seasonal trends. The team wants to deploy a machine learning model that can update daily as new data arrives, while also capturing non-linear interactions between features. Which SageMaker approach is most suitable?

A) Use XGBoost with daily retraining pipelines in SageMaker Pipelines
B) Use Linear Learner with hourly retraining
C) Use K-Means clustering to segment pricing patterns
D) Use PCA for dimensionality reduction and deploy directly

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Using XGBoost with daily retraining pipelines in SageMaker Pipelines is the most appropriate solution because XGBoost is highly capable of modeling non-linear relationships and complex interactions between numerical and categorical features, which are typical in dynamic pricing scenarios. Features like historical sales, competitor prices, seasonal indicators, and promotions often interact in non-linear ways, which linear models cannot capture. By leveraging SageMaker Pipelines, the company can orchestrate automated workflows that include preprocessing, feature engineering, model training, evaluation, and deployment. Daily retraining ensures that the model adapts to changing market conditions, competitor pricing, and consumer behavior. Pipelines also enable conditional steps, such as retraining only if model performance falls below a certain threshold, and allow versioning of models in the SageMaker Model Registry. This approach is fully managed, scalable, and integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as S3 for storage, Lambda for triggers, and EventBridge for scheduling. The automation ensures consistent and reproducible training and deployment workflows, reducing operational overhead and ensuring that pricing predictions remain up-to-date and optimized for maximum revenue.

B) Linear Learner is limited to capturing linear relationships. While it can be retrained hourly to adapt to new data, it cannot model complex interactions, non-linear trends, or seasonal effects effectively. Hourly retraining increases computational cost without significant gains in model performance, particularly when the underlying relationships are non-linear. For dynamic pricing, where complex interactions drive revenue, Linear Learner would underfit the data, produce suboptimal pricing predictions, and fail to capture key patterns in consumer behavior. Therefore, it is unsuitable for this scenario.

C) K-Means clustering is an unsupervised learning algorithm designed to group similar data points. It could theoretically be used to segment products or customers, but it cannot directly predict optimal prices or dynamically adjust pricing strategies. Clustering would provide insights into categories or patterns but would not generate actionable predictions. Using K-Means alone would not satisfy the business requirement for a predictive dynamic pricing system.

D) PCA (Principal Component Analysis) reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming correlated features into uncorrelated components. While PCA can be used as a preprocessing step to reduce noise and feature space, it does not perform prediction or modeling. Deploying PCA alone without a predictive algorithm would not generate pricing predictions or capture non-linear interactions. PCA can aid model training efficiency but cannot replace supervised learning methods required for dynamic pricing.

Hence, XGBoost with daily retraining pipelines provides non-linear modeling capabilities, automation, scalability, and the ability to adapt to daily market changes, making it the optimal solution.

Question 142

A logistics company wants to predict shipment delays using historical transport and weather data. Data comes from multiple sources in different formats and must be cleaned, transformed, and joined before model training. Which AWS service combination is most appropriate for preprocessing and preparing this data for SageMaker training?

A) SageMaker Processing jobs with Pandas and Spark for ETL
B) AWS Lambda for real-time transformations and direct training in SageMaker
C) Amazon Kinesis for batch data ingestion and model training
D) SageMaker Studio notebooks only, without processing jobs

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SageMaker Processing jobs are designed specifically for preprocessing and feature engineering workflows prior to training. They allow the use of familiar frameworks like Pandas and Spark within a fully managed environment. Pandas is suitable for small to medium datasets, while Spark can scale to large datasets with distributed computing. SageMaker Processing handles multiple input sources, various formats (CSV, Parquet, JSON), and complex transformations such as joining multiple tables, imputing missing values, encoding categorical features, and generating derived features. This approach also integrates with S3 for input and output storage, allowing seamless data flow to SageMaker Training Jobs. Processing jobs are fully managed, scalable, reproducible, and can be automated using SageMaker Pipelines, ensuring consistent preprocessing across training runs.

B) AWS Lambda is designed for lightweight, short-lived operations. It has limitations on memory, execution duration, and local storage. Preprocessing large, multi-source datasets for training would exceed these limits. Lambda is suitable for real-time streaming transformations but not for batch ETL tasks requiring extensive joins, cleaning, and feature engineering. Using Lambda for preprocessing would require complex orchestration and would not scale efficiently for large historical datasets.

C) Amazon Kinesis is a streaming service designed for real-time data ingestion. While it can ingest live transport and weather data streams, it is not suitable for batch preprocessing or feature engineering for training datasets. Kinesis can complement preprocessing pipelines by supplying near-real-time updates, but it cannot replace large-scale batch ETL or complex joins necessary for training historical data models.

D) SageMaker Studio notebooks provide an interactive development environment for exploratory data analysis and experimentation. While notebooks are excellent for prototyping and initial cleaning, they are not ideal for large-scale automated preprocessing pipelines. Without processing jobs, notebooks require manual intervention, lack automated scaling, and are difficult to integrate into production training workflows. They also do not provide the same level of reproducibility or job orchestration that SageMaker Processing provides.

Therefore, SageMaker Processing jobs with Pandas and Spark provide a scalable, automated, and reproducible solution for preparing heterogeneous data sources for machine learning.

Question 143

A company wants to deploy a real-time sentiment analysis model on product reviews. The model receives high volumes of requests during promotions but is idle most of the time. They want to minimize cost while maintaining low-latency inference. Which deployment option is most suitable?

A) SageMaker Serverless Inference
B) SageMaker Real-Time Endpoints with fixed instance count
C) Batch Transform jobs every hour
D) Lambda function preprocessing before sending requests to a fixed endpoint

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SageMaker Serverless Inference is designed for variable traffic patterns and low-latency real-time inference. It automatically provisions compute resources when requests arrive and scales down when idle, which optimizes cost for workloads with high variability. Serverless Inference eliminates the need to manage endpoint instance types or counts, and it ensures sub-second latency suitable for real-time applications like sentiment analysis. It is ideal when the workload is bursty, with periods of inactivity, reducing unnecessary costs associated with idle resources. Serverless Inference supports both CPU and GPU workloads and integrates with the SageMaker Model Registry for seamless deployment of model versions.

B) Real-Time Endpoints with fixed instance counts provide low-latency inference but incur constant costs, even when the endpoint is idle. For highly variable traffic, fixed endpoints are inefficient because resources are underutilized during low-demand periods, leading to higher operational costs without proportional benefits.

C) Batch Transform is intended for asynchronous batch inference and is unsuitable for real-time sentiment analysis. It introduces delays because predictions are computed on large datasets in bulk rather than processing individual requests with low latency. Batch Transform cannot respond to live user interactions or provide immediate feedback.

D) Lambda preprocessing can handle lightweight transformations but cannot replace inference scaling. Invoking a fixed endpoint still incurs the same idle costs as fixed real-time endpoints. While Lambda could handle input transformations, the overall architecture would not optimize compute costs for the inference phase. It also introduces latency and additional orchestration complexity.

Thus, SageMaker Serverless Inference is optimal for real-time sentiment analysis with variable traffic, providing automatic scaling, low latency, and cost efficiency.

Question 144

A company wants to predict customer churn using historical transaction data. The dataset contains many categorical features like region, product type, and subscription level. Which preprocessing step is most appropriate to prepare categorical variables for supervised learning models in SageMaker?

A) One-hot encoding or embedding representations
B) Standard scaling using mean and standard deviation
C) PCA to reduce categorical dimensions
D) Normalization to 0-1 range

Answer: A

Explanation

A) One-hot encoding or embedding representations are the most suitable methods for handling categorical variables. One-hot encoding creates binary vectors for each category, making categorical variables compatible with supervised learning algorithms like XGBoost or Linear Learner. For high-cardinality categorical variables (e.g., thousands of product types), embeddings can efficiently represent categories in a lower-dimensional dense vector space. Embeddings are particularly effective in neural networks because they capture relationships and similarities between categories, allowing models to generalize better and improving predictive performance. Both one-hot and embeddings preserve categorical information without introducing artificial numerical relationships, which is critical for accurate churn prediction.

B) Standard scaling (subtract mean, divide by standard deviation) is suitable for continuous numeric features, not categorical variables. Applying standard scaling to categorical IDs would impose an artificial ordering and magnitude relationship that does not exist, potentially harming model performance.

C) PCA is a dimensionality reduction technique intended for numeric features. Applying PCA directly to categorical data without proper encoding is meaningless because PCA relies on linear combinations of numeric features and cannot interpret categorical semantics.

D) Normalization (scaling numeric values to 0-1 range) is also applicable only to continuous features. It does not encode categorical variables and would not resolve categorical representation for ML models.

Therefore, one-hot encoding or embeddings are the appropriate preprocessing strategies for categorical features in churn prediction.

Question 145

A marketing team wants to segment customers based on purchase behavior using SageMaker. They have no labeled segments and want to discover natural groupings. Which algorithm is most appropriate?

A) SageMaker K-Means
B) SageMaker XGBoost
C) SageMaker Linear Learner
D) SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) SageMaker K-Means is the optimal choice because it is an unsupervised clustering algorithm designed to discover natural groupings in unlabeled datasets. Customer segmentation involves grouping similar customers based on features such as purchase frequency, amount spent, and product preferences. K-Means partitions customers into clusters by minimizing within-cluster variance and assigning each customer to the nearest cluster centroid. This method supports scaling to large datasets and integrates with SageMaker for distributed computation. It allows marketers to target specific clusters with personalized campaigns, promotions, or recommendations. K-Means also allows specifying the number of clusters based on business needs or using the elbow method to determine optimal cluster count.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm for classification and regression. Since customer segments are unlabeled, XGBoost is inappropriate because it requires a target variable. Using XGBoost would not reveal natural groupings in an unsupervised setting.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm, and similar to XGBoost, it cannot discover clusters without labeled targets. It is suitable for regression or binary/multi-class classification, not unsupervised segmentation.

D) DeepAR is a time-series forecasting algorithm for probabilistic predictions. It is unsuitable for static customer segmentation, as it is designed for sequential data and temporal patterns, not clustering.

Hence, SageMaker K-Means is ideal for discovering natural customer segments in an unsupervised manner.

Question 146

A company wants to perform anomaly detection on IoT sensor data from industrial machines to predict potential failures. The dataset is large, multi-dimensional, and unlabeled. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable for this task?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
D) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest (RCF) is specifically designed for unsupervised anomaly detection in multi-dimensional datasets. It is ideal for IoT sensor data, which is often high-dimensional, continuous, and contains temporal patterns that may indicate abnormal machine behavior. Random Cut Forest works by constructing an ensemble of random trees to detect anomalies based on the concept of data point isolation. Outliers are naturally isolated closer to the root of trees, which allows RCF to score anomalies effectively.

RCF is capable of handling large datasets efficiently, and it scales well for multi-dimensional streaming or batch data. It does not require labeled data, which is important because IoT anomaly labels are usually unavailable or very sparse. SageMaker provides a managed environment for Random Cut Forest training and inference, enabling integration with sensor data pipelines and automated anomaly scoring. By deploying RCF, the company can monitor sensor streams in real time and trigger alerts when anomalies are detected, reducing maintenance costs and preventing catastrophic machine failures.

B) XGBoost is a supervised learning algorithm designed for regression and classification problems. It cannot be used effectively for unsupervised anomaly detection, particularly when labels are absent. While XGBoost can be used with engineered anomaly labels, generating these labels in real-world IoT data is challenging and may introduce bias. Therefore, XGBoost is not suitable for this unlabeled anomaly detection scenario.

C) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm used to group similar data points. While clustering can help identify some outlier points relative to cluster centroids, K-Means is not specifically designed for anomaly detection. It is sensitive to cluster initialization and assumes spherical clusters of similar variance, which may not represent complex patterns in multi-dimensional sensor data. This approach may miss subtle anomalies or incorrectly flag normal variations as outliers.

D) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm suitable for regression or classification. Without labeled data indicating normal vs. anomalous conditions, it cannot detect anomalies. Applying Linear Learner directly to this unlabeled dataset would not provide meaningful results.

Therefore, Random Cut Forest is optimal for large, multi-dimensional, unlabeled IoT sensor data for anomaly detection.

Question 147

A bank wants to perform credit scoring using historical customer transaction and demographic data. They require interpretable results to comply with regulatory requirements. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
B) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
C) Amazon SageMaker Factorization Machines
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Linear Learner is the ideal choice for credit scoring due to its interpretability and effectiveness for structured tabular data. It models the relationship between numeric and categorical features and a binary outcome (approved/rejected or high-risk/low-risk). Linear coefficients indicate the importance of each feature in the prediction, providing transparency needed for regulatory compliance. This allows auditors and stakeholders to understand the model’s decision-making process and justify credit decisions. Linear Learner supports L1 or L2 regularization to prevent overfitting and can handle large datasets efficiently.

B) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. It does not perform supervised classification and cannot generate a probability or risk score for individual customers. While it could segment customers into groups, it cannot directly provide interpretable credit scoring.

C) Factorization Machines are designed for modeling interactions in high-dimensional sparse data, commonly used for recommendations. While powerful for sparse categorical interactions, they are less interpretable than linear models. For regulated applications like credit scoring, regulators prefer transparent models that can be explained, making Factorization Machines suboptimal.

D) DeepAR is a time-series forecasting algorithm. Credit scoring is not a temporal forecasting problem; it requires supervised classification of customers at a point in time based on historical features. DeepAR cannot produce interpretable credit risk scores for regulatory compliance.

Therefore, Linear Learner is optimal for interpretable, compliant credit scoring models.

Question 148

A marketing team wants to recommend products to customers based on past purchase behavior and product metadata. The dataset is highly sparse with many categorical features. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate for building a recommendation system?

A) Amazon SageMaker Factorization Machines
B) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Factorization Machines are specifically designed for sparse datasets and high-dimensional categorical features, which are common in recommendation systems. They model pairwise interactions between features, capturing relationships between users and products as well as metadata interactions like category, brand, or demographic information. Factorization Machines learn latent factors that allow personalized recommendations and can generalize to unseen user-item combinations. SageMaker Factorization Machines efficiently handle large-scale sparse data, integrate with the SageMaker Model Registry, and support batch and real-time inference for recommendation pipelines. This approach balances accuracy, scalability, and flexibility in production recommendation systems.

B) K-Means is a clustering algorithm. While it can segment customers or products into groups, it cannot generate personalized recommendations or model latent interactions between users and items. Recommendations derived from clustering would be coarse-grained and less accurate.

C) Linear Learner can model supervised classification or regression tasks on tabular data but is ineffective for sparse user-item matrices with millions of interactions. It does not capture latent interactions critical for personalized recommendations, making it suboptimal.

D) Random Cut Forest is designed for anomaly detection. It cannot provide predictions or personalized recommendations. Applying it to sparse purchase data would not generate useful results for a recommendation system.

Therefore, Factorization Machines are the optimal solution for building scalable, accurate, and metadata-aware recommendation systems in SageMaker.

Question 149

A company wants to forecast daily sales for thousands of stores and SKUs. The dataset exhibits seasonality, trends, and holidays. The company wants probabilistic forecasts to manage inventory effectively. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the optimal choice for probabilistic time-series forecasting at scale. It uses recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to model temporal dependencies and can capture complex patterns such as seasonality, trends, holidays, and promotions across thousands of related time series. DeepAR outputs probabilistic forecasts, allowing the company to quantify uncertainty in predicted sales. This enables effective inventory management by planning for upper and lower demand bounds, minimizing stockouts or overstock. DeepAR supports categorical features for SKUs and stores, allows distributed training across multiple nodes, and leverages SageMaker managed infrastructure for scalability.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised linear model. While it can perform regression, it does not natively model temporal dependencies, seasonality, or probabilistic outputs. Applying a linear model would likely underfit the data and fail to capture complex sales patterns, leading to inaccurate forecasts.

C) XGBoost can handle tabular regression with engineered features (lags, rolling averages, or one-hot encoded time variables), but it cannot generate probabilistic forecasts naturally. Feature engineering for thousands of SKUs across multiple stores is labor-intensive and prone to error. XGBoost would produce point estimates without uncertainty, making inventory risk management more challenging.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm and cannot perform forecasting. It could be used to segment stores or products but cannot predict future sales or provide probabilistic forecasts.

Hence, DeepAR is the best choice for scalable, probabilistic forecasting of thousands of seasonal and trending time series.

Question 150

A company wants to detect fraudulent transactions in real time. The dataset is highly imbalanced (fraud < 1%) and consists of structured transaction features. They need a model with high recall to minimize missed fraud. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) XGBoost is ideal for fraud detection in structured, tabular, highly imbalanced datasets. It supports supervised classification, feature importance interpretation, and imbalance handling through parameters like scale_pos_weight. High recall can be achieved by tuning thresholds or using evaluation metrics that prioritize capturing positive (fraudulent) cases. XGBoost efficiently models complex interactions between transaction features such as amount, merchant, location, and transaction time. Its distributed training support in SageMaker allows scaling to millions of transactions while providing fast inference for real-time detection pipelines. XGBoost also integrates with SageMaker Endpoint or Batch Transform for deployment, making it suitable for production fraud detection systems.

B) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. It cannot perform supervised classification or optimize recall in imbalanced fraud detection scenarios. While it could detect outlier transactions, it lacks the precision and predictive capability of supervised learning models.

C) Linear Learner can be used for supervised classification but may struggle with complex feature interactions present in fraud data. Imbalance handling is less flexible than XGBoost, and recall optimization requires careful threshold tuning. It may work for simple cases but is generally less accurate than XGBoost for high-dimensional fraud datasets.

D) Random Cut Forest is designed for unsupervised anomaly detection. While it can flag unusual transactions, it does not provide supervised classification and cannot optimize for recall. In addition, it may produce high false positives in dense transaction patterns, which is undesirable in financial fraud detection.

Thus, XGBoost is the most appropriate algorithm for high-recall, scalable, and supervised fraud detection in structured datasets.

Question 151

A streaming platform wants to predict user churn using historical watch behavior and subscription data. The dataset is large, with categorical features like region, device type, and subscription tier. The company also wants feature importance for interpretability. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost is highly suitable for churn prediction in large tabular datasets with categorical and numerical features. XGBoost is a supervised gradient boosting algorithm that builds an ensemble of decision trees to model complex non-linear relationships between features and target variables, which is essential in churn prediction because user behavior patterns can be highly complex. For example, combinations of device type, region, and subscription tier may interact in non-linear ways that influence churn probability.

XGBoost also supports feature importance calculation, which allows the business to identify which factors contribute most to churn, providing interpretability for internal analysis or regulatory purposes. Imbalanced datasets can be addressed using parameters like scale_pos_weight or customized evaluation metrics such as AUC or F1-score to optimize for recall, which is important to identify potential churners accurately. Additionally, XGBoost can scale to millions of records with SageMaker’s distributed training capabilities, making it suitable for large streaming datasets.

B) Linear Learner is a linear supervised algorithm suitable for regression or classification. While it provides interpretability and handles large datasets efficiently, it cannot capture non-linear feature interactions, which are often present in churn prediction. Consequently, it may underfit the data and fail to identify complex patterns that influence user churn, resulting in lower predictive performance.

C) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. While it can segment users into groups, it cannot predict churn probabilities directly. Segmentation may provide insights for marketing strategies but does not replace a supervised model for predicting churn likelihood.

D) DeepAR is a time-series forecasting algorithm used for sequential or temporal data. While churn may have temporal components, predicting churn primarily requires supervised classification rather than sequence forecasting. DeepAR does not provide feature importance or interpretability in the context of supervised churn prediction.

Therefore, XGBoost is optimal for large-scale, interpretable churn prediction with non-linear feature interactions and imbalance handling.

Question 152

A healthcare provider wants to forecast patient admissions to manage staff allocation. The dataset includes historical admission counts, seasonal effects, and holidays. Probabilistic forecasts are required for planning. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the optimal choice for probabilistic forecasting of patient admissions. It uses recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to model temporal dependencies in time-series data, capturing trends, seasonality, and external effects like holidays. For healthcare staffing, probabilistic forecasts are crucial to estimate not only expected admissions but also confidence intervals for planning. This helps in ensuring adequate staffing to handle peak demand while avoiding unnecessary overstaffing.

DeepAR can handle multiple related time series simultaneously, making it suitable if the provider has multiple departments or hospitals. It also supports categorical covariates, such as hospital location or department, and can generate quantile forecasts to quantify uncertainty. SageMaker provides scalable training and inference infrastructure, allowing models to process large historical datasets efficiently.

B) Linear Learner is a linear regression or classification model. While it can predict numerical outcomes, it does not capture temporal dependencies or seasonality inherent in patient admissions. It also does not provide probabilistic forecasts, limiting its usefulness for planning under uncertainty.

C) XGBoost is a supervised learning algorithm for tabular data. Although it can handle engineered features like lag values, rolling averages, and encoded seasonality, it does not naturally model sequential dependencies or generate probabilistic forecasts. Creating these features for multiple time series at scale is complex and error-prone.

D) Random Cut Forest is designed for anomaly detection. It cannot forecast patient admissions, trends, or uncertainty intervals. Using it would only highlight unusual admission patterns but not provide actionable forecasts for staffing.

Thus, DeepAR provides scalable, probabilistic, multi-series forecasting, capturing seasonality and trends necessary for healthcare planning.

Question 153

A financial services firm wants to detect unusual trading patterns in real time using multi-dimensional transaction data. The dataset is unlabeled and extremely large. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
D) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest (RCF) is designed for unsupervised anomaly detection in multi-dimensional datasets. In financial trading, unusual patterns such as sudden spikes in volume or irregular sequences of trades may indicate fraud or market manipulation. RCF constructs an ensemble of random trees to measure the degree of isolation for each data point, assigning anomaly scores based on how quickly a point is isolated. Points that differ significantly from the normal distribution of trading behavior receive higher anomaly scores, allowing real-time alerts.

RCF handles large-scale datasets efficiently and works well with unlabeled data, which is critical because labeled anomalies are often unavailable. SageMaker provides managed training and inference infrastructure for RCF, enabling integration with streaming pipelines for real-time detection. The algorithm also adapts to changes in distribution over time, helping identify both sudden anomalies and gradual deviations from normal behavior.

B) XGBoost is a supervised learning algorithm. Without labeled anomalies, it cannot directly detect unusual trading patterns. While engineered labels could be used, generating accurate anomaly labels is challenging in real-world trading datasets.

C) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. Although clustering could help identify points far from cluster centroids, it is less effective than RCF for high-dimensional, continuously changing financial data. K-Means also assumes spherical clusters of equal variance, which rarely occurs in trading datasets, leading to missed anomalies or false positives.

D) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm for regression or classification. Without labeled anomalies, it cannot detect unusual trading patterns. Applying it to unlabeled streaming data would not produce meaningful results.

Hence, Random Cut Forest is optimal for scalable, real-time, unsupervised anomaly detection in financial transactions.

Question 154

A retailer wants to segment customers based on purchase frequency, average order value, and product preferences for targeted marketing campaigns. No labeled segments are available. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) K-Means clustering is the ideal choice for unsupervised customer segmentation. It groups customers into clusters based on similarity across multiple features such as purchase frequency, order value, and product preferences. Each cluster represents a segment with similar behavior, enabling targeted marketing strategies. For example, one cluster may include frequent buyers with high average order value, while another may represent infrequent buyers with low spending. K-Means minimizes within-cluster variance and assigns each customer to the nearest cluster centroid, producing actionable segments.

SageMaker provides distributed K-Means training to handle large datasets and allows integration with downstream marketing pipelines for batch or real-time targeting. It also supports scalable preprocessing and evaluation of cluster quality using metrics like the silhouette score.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm. Without labeled segments, it cannot segment customers. XGBoost is suitable for classification or regression tasks but not unsupervised clustering.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification algorithm. It cannot segment customers in an unsupervised context.

D) DeepAR is a probabilistic time-series forecasting algorithm. Customer segmentation does not involve temporal forecasting; DeepAR is irrelevant in this scenario.

Thus, K-Means is optimal for discovering natural customer segments in an unsupervised manner for targeted marketing.

Question 155

A telecommunications company wants to predict the likelihood of network failures based on historical network metrics. The dataset is large, multi-dimensional, and labeled with failure events. The company requires high recall to minimize missed failures. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
B) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
C) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) XGBoost is the most suitable choice for predicting network failures in labeled, multi-dimensional datasets. XGBoost is a gradient boosting algorithm that models complex non-linear interactions between features such as latency, bandwidth, packet loss, and error rates. High recall is critical to detect as many potential failures as possible to prevent downtime. XGBoost allows tuning of hyperparameters and thresholds to optimize for recall, while still maintaining reasonable precision. It can scale efficiently using SageMaker distributed training, making it suitable for large-scale network datasets. Feature importance provides insights into which network metrics contribute most to failures, helping engineers understand and mitigate risk.

B) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. It cannot predict failures in a supervised context and is unsuitable for high-recall prediction of labeled failure events.

C) Random Cut Forest is an unsupervised anomaly detection algorithm. While it can detect unusual network events, it cannot leverage labeled failure data or optimize for recall. It may also produce higher false positives in structured datasets, reducing practical usability.

D) DeepAR is designed for probabilistic time-series forecasting. Predicting network failures is a classification problem rather than temporal forecasting, so DeepAR is not appropriate.

Hence, XGBoost provides supervised learning, high recall, interpretability, and scalability necessary for predicting network failures accurately.

Question 156

A transportation company wants to predict vehicle arrival times at different locations using historical GPS data. The data includes timestamps, vehicle IDs, traffic conditions, and weather information. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate for this time-series forecasting task?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the optimal choice for predicting vehicle arrival times in a time-series forecasting problem. It is a recurrent neural network-based algorithm that models sequential temporal dependencies in historical data. The GPS dataset contains timestamps, vehicle IDs, traffic conditions, and weather data, all of which affect arrival times. DeepAR can capture complex patterns such as trends, seasonality, and the impact of external covariates like traffic congestion or weather events.

DeepAR produces probabilistic forecasts, allowing the transportation company to quantify uncertainty in predicted arrival times. Probabilistic outputs are crucial for logistics planning, enabling the company to manage schedules, anticipate delays, and improve customer satisfaction. It can handle multiple related time series, such as different vehicles or routes, by learning shared patterns, which enhances forecast accuracy for less frequent routes or vehicles with sparse historical data.

B) Linear Learner is a linear regression or classification algorithm that models numeric or categorical features using linear relationships. While it can predict arrival times as a regression problem, it cannot naturally capture temporal dependencies, seasonal trends, or complex interactions between features such as traffic patterns and weather. Linear Learner would underfit the dataset and produce less accurate forecasts compared to DeepAR.

C) XGBoost is a powerful supervised learning algorithm for tabular data and can perform regression on engineered features. While it could theoretically be applied to this problem by creating lag features or rolling averages, this approach is labor-intensive and does not naturally handle sequences. XGBoost produces point estimates rather than probabilistic forecasts, limiting its usefulness for risk management and planning.

D) K-Means is an unsupervised clustering algorithm. It can group similar data points but cannot predict future vehicle arrival times. Using K-Means would only identify clusters of similar routes or trips but cannot generate forecasts.

Therefore, DeepAR is the best algorithm for multi-series probabilistic forecasting of vehicle arrival times considering temporal dependencies, trends, and external factors.

Question 157

A company wants to predict energy consumption for multiple buildings to optimize heating and cooling schedules. The dataset includes hourly energy usage, weather data, and occupancy information. They also need uncertainty estimates for better planning. Which SageMaker algorithm is most suitable?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the most appropriate choice for forecasting energy consumption in buildings. Energy usage is a time-series problem with multiple related series, such as individual buildings, floors, or zones. DeepAR can model temporal patterns, trends, and seasonality across these series, while incorporating external covariates like weather and occupancy data.

Probabilistic forecasts are critical for energy planning because they allow facility managers to plan for expected usage as well as potential peaks or anomalies. For example, if a forecast predicts high variability due to extreme weather, energy managers can preemptively adjust heating or cooling schedules. DeepAR’s ability to produce quantile forecasts enables actionable decision-making under uncertainty.

B) Linear Learner can model energy consumption using regression, but it cannot capture complex temporal dependencies, trends, or seasonal patterns. Linear models assume additive relationships and may fail to represent interactions between occupancy, weather, and historical energy usage, leading to suboptimal predictions.

C) XGBoost is a gradient boosting algorithm for tabular data. While it can handle regression using engineered features such as lag variables or rolling averages, it does not naturally capture sequential dependencies. It also produces point estimates without uncertainty, limiting its effectiveness for risk-aware energy planning.

D) Random Cut Forest is designed for anomaly detection. While it could flag unusual energy usage, it cannot predict future energy consumption or quantify uncertainty. Its application would be limited to identifying outliers rather than generating actionable forecasts.

Therefore, DeepAR is the optimal algorithm for multi-series probabilistic energy forecasting with external covariates.

Question 158

A financial company wants to detect unusual transactions indicative of fraud using structured transaction data. The dataset is unlabeled, and they need a scalable unsupervised approach for anomaly detection. Which SageMaker algorithm should they use?

A) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest
B) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
C) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
D) Amazon SageMaker K-Means

Answer: A

Explanation

A) Random Cut Forest (RCF) is the most suitable unsupervised algorithm for detecting anomalous financial transactions. RCF identifies data points that are outliers relative to the normal distribution of multi-dimensional inputs. Transactions that differ significantly from historical patterns, such as unusual amounts, locations, or frequencies, are flagged with high anomaly scores.

RCF is scalable and can handle high-dimensional datasets typical of financial transactions. It works without labeled anomalies, which is ideal because fraud labeling is often limited or delayed. RCF supports real-time streaming detection as well as batch analysis, allowing the company to monitor transactions continuously and trigger alerts when anomalies occur. SageMaker provides a managed environment for training, tuning, and deploying RCF models efficiently.

B) XGBoost is a supervised algorithm requiring labeled data. Without labeled fraudulent transactions, XGBoost cannot be applied directly for unsupervised anomaly detection. Generating synthetic labels would introduce bias and reduce model reliability.

C) Linear Learner is a supervised regression or classification algorithm. Like XGBoost, it requires labeled data and cannot detect anomalies without prior labels, making it unsuitable for this use case.

D) K-Means clustering is an unsupervised algorithm that groups similar data points. While points far from cluster centroids may indicate unusual transactions, K-Means is sensitive to cluster initialization and assumes spherical clusters of equal variance. It is less robust for high-dimensional financial data compared to RCF and does not provide scalable anomaly scoring.

Therefore, Random Cut Forest is the optimal algorithm for unsupervised, scalable, and real-time anomaly detection in financial transactions.

Question 159

A telecommunications company wants to segment customers into groups based on usage patterns, such as call duration, data usage, and roaming activity. No labeled segments are available. Which SageMaker algorithm is most appropriate?

A) Amazon SageMaker K-Means
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR

Answer: A

Explanation

A) K-Means is the ideal choice for unsupervised customer segmentation. The algorithm partitions customers into clusters based on similarity in usage patterns such as call duration, data usage, and roaming activity. Each cluster represents a natural group of customers, which can then be targeted for marketing campaigns, personalized plans, or promotions.

K-Means minimizes intra-cluster variance and allows specifying the number of clusters based on business objectives or using methods like the elbow method to determine the optimal number. SageMaker supports distributed K-Means training for large datasets and enables easy integration into batch or real-time pipelines for marketing actions. Segmentation helps the company understand customer behavior and optimize revenue strategies without requiring labeled data.

B) Linear Learner is a supervised algorithm for regression or classification and cannot segment customers in an unsupervised context. Applying it without labels would not produce meaningful clusters.

C) XGBoost is a supervised learning algorithm. Without labels for segments, it cannot create clusters or categorize customers into groups. It is designed for prediction rather than unsupervised grouping.

D) DeepAR is a probabilistic time-series forecasting algorithm. Customer segmentation based on static or aggregate usage patterns is not a forecasting problem, so DeepAR is inappropriate.

Therefore, K-Means is the optimal algorithm for unsupervised customer segmentation in telecommunications.

Question 160

A retailer wants to forecast product demand for thousands of SKUs across multiple stores. The data exhibits seasonality, trends, and promotions. The retailer needs probabilistic forecasts to optimize inventory and minimize stockouts. Which SageMaker algorithm should they use?

A) Amazon SageMaker DeepAR Forecasting
B) Amazon SageMaker Linear Learner
C) Amazon SageMaker XGBoost
D) Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest

Answer: A

Explanation

A) DeepAR is the best choice for large-scale probabilistic demand forecasting. It models temporal dependencies, seasonality, trends, and the effects of promotions across multiple SKUs and stores. DeepAR can learn patterns across related time series, which improves forecast accuracy for SKUs with sparse historical data.

Probabilistic outputs are essential for inventory optimization because they allow managers to plan for both expected demand and uncertainty. Quantile forecasts provide confidence intervals, enabling better risk management for stockouts or overstock situations. DeepAR can incorporate categorical features (store ID, SKU ID) and external covariates (promotions, holidays), which influence demand patterns. SageMaker’s managed training and inference infrastructure allows scaling to thousands of time series efficiently.

B) Linear Learner cannot model complex temporal dependencies or probabilistic outcomes. It may underfit seasonal patterns and produce less accurate forecasts, limiting its utility for inventory planning.

C) XGBoost is a supervised regression algorithm. While it can be used with engineered features like lagged demand, rolling averages, and encoded time variables, it does not naturally produce probabilistic forecasts and is cumbersome for thousands of time series.

D) Random Cut Forest is for anomaly detection and cannot perform forecasting. It may flag unusual demand but cannot generate predictions or confidence intervals for inventory planning.

Thus, DeepAR is optimal for scalable, probabilistic, multi-SKU demand forecasting considering seasonality, trends, and promotions.