Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning – Specialty (MLS-C01) Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 7 Q121-140

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Machine Learning – Specialty exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 121

A company wants to train multiple ML models in parallel with automatic hyperparameter optimization. Which service is most suitable?

A) SageMaker Hyperparameter Tuning
B) AWS Step Functions
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Hyperparameter Tuning is designed specifically to automate the process of experimenting with multiple hyperparameter combinations across one or more models. It allows parallel execution of training jobs, tracks performance metrics, and applies optimization strategies such as Bayesian optimization or random search to efficiently identify the best set of hyperparameters. This makes it ideal for organizations that need to optimize multiple models simultaneously without manually managing each experiment.

AWS Step Functions is a workflow orchestration service that coordinates multiple AWS services into automated workflows. While Step Functions can trigger multiple training jobs or ML processes in sequence or parallel, it does not inherently provide hyperparameter optimization or metric tracking. Essentially, Step Functions is more of a conductor of tasks rather than a tool for optimizing ML performance.

Amazon EMR is a managed big data platform designed to process large volumes of structured or unstructured data using distributed computing frameworks such as Hadoop or Spark. Although EMR can be used to run ML algorithms through frameworks like Spark MLlib, it does not provide automatic hyperparameter tuning or built-in ML optimization features. EMR focuses on data processing scalability rather than model training automation.

AWS Glue is primarily an extract, transform, and load (ETL) service for preparing and moving data. Glue allows you to clean, transform, and catalog data at scale but has no native functionality for training ML models or performing hyperparameter optimization. It is useful for data pipelines but not for running parallel ML experiments.

SageMaker Hyperparameter Tuning is the correct choice because it combines automated parallel experiments, efficient resource usage, and built-in optimization methods tailored to ML training. Unlike the other options, it directly addresses the need for simultaneously training multiple models while systematically improving performance through metric-driven hyperparameter selection. Step Functions could orchestrate the workflow but wouldn’t optimize; EMR and Glue handle data or general computation, not specialized ML tuning. Hyperparameter Tuning is purpose-built to manage both the experimentation and optimization of ML models efficiently.

Question 122

A healthcare startup wants to label sensitive medical images securely with HIPAA compliance. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce
B) Mechanical Turk
C) AWS Batch
D) Rekognition Custom Labels

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce allows organizations to create a fully private labeling workforce that operates within a secure Virtual Private Cloud (VPC). This approach ensures that sensitive data, such as medical images, remains protected and compliant with HIPAA regulations. It also provides audit logging to track who labeled data and when, which is essential for regulated industries.

Mechanical Turk is a crowdsourcing platform that provides access to a public pool of human workers. While it is effective for large-scale labeling tasks, it does not provide isolation, encryption, or HIPAA compliance guarantees. Using Mechanical Turk for sensitive medical data would pose a significant compliance risk.

AWS Batch is a fully managed service for running batch computing workloads on AWS. It is suitable for executing large-scale compute jobs but is not intended for human-in-the-loop labeling or secure handling of sensitive datasets. Batch can process data but cannot ensure regulatory compliance in human labeling tasks.

Rekognition Custom Labels allows users to train computer vision models for custom object detection and classification. While it provides automated labeling through ML, it does not offer the ability to manage a private human workforce for secure labeling. For sensitive medical datasets, automated labeling alone may not meet accuracy or compliance requirements.

SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce is the correct solution because it combines secure VPC isolation, HIPAA compliance, and the ability to manage a private, vetted team of labelers. Unlike Mechanical Turk, it provides privacy and audit logging. Unlike Batch and Rekognition, it specifically addresses both the human labeling requirement and regulatory compliance. For healthcare startups handling sensitive images, it ensures safety, security, and adherence to industry standards.

Question 123

A team wants to deploy thousands of small ML models on a single endpoint efficiently, loading models on demand. Which feature should they use?

A) SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints
B) SageMaker Asynchronous Inference
C) ECS Auto Scaling
D) EC2 Spot Instances

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints allow multiple models to be hosted on a single endpoint. The service loads models dynamically from Amazon S3 as inference requests arrive, which reduces memory usage and operational overhead. This is particularly useful for scenarios where hundreds or thousands of smaller models need to be available simultaneously without dedicating separate endpoints for each model.

SageMaker Asynchronous Inference is designed for long-running inference requests that may take minutes or hours to process. While it can queue requests and scale automatically, it does not handle the dynamic loading of multiple models on a single endpoint. It is better suited for batch or delayed processing scenarios rather than multi-model serving.

ECS Auto Scaling manages the scaling of containerized applications running on Amazon ECS. While it can help adjust the number of container instances based on demand, it does not provide built-in capabilities for hosting multiple ML models on a single endpoint or dynamically loading models from storage. It focuses on general container orchestration.

EC2 Spot Instances provide cost-effective compute capacity for general workloads by taking advantage of unused EC2 resources. While cost-efficient, they require manual orchestration and management, and they do not solve the problem of dynamic multi-model hosting or memory-efficient model loading.

SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints is the correct choice because it is purpose-built for hosting multiple models efficiently, dynamically loading models only when requested, and reducing operational overhead. Asynchronous Inference is more for delayed or batch requests, ECS scaling is for container orchestration, and EC2 Spot is for cost-efficient compute. Only Multi-Model Endpoints directly address the need to serve thousands of models on demand at a single endpoint.

Question 124

A company wants to forecast deliveries using historical and related datasets for multiple locations. Which AWS service is best?

A) Amazon Forecast
B) SageMaker Autopilot
C) AWS Lambda
D) Lookout for Metrics

Answer: A

Explanation:

Amazon Forecast is a fully managed service that uses machine learning to deliver accurate time-series forecasting. It can incorporate historical data along with related datasets such as holidays, promotions, or weather to improve predictive accuracy. It supports multiple items, geographies, and can automatically select the best algorithm and optimize hyperparameters for forecasting tasks.

SageMaker Autopilot automates machine learning model building, allowing users to create classification or regression models. While it is powerful for general-purpose ML tasks, it does not specialize in time-series forecasting or the automatic handling of multiple related datasets for predictions like deliveries.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that executes code in response to triggers. While Lambda can process data or trigger ML pipelines, it does not provide ML modeling, hyperparameter tuning, or time-series forecasting capabilities. It is purely an execution environment.

Lookout for Metrics detects anomalies in time-series data using ML models. While useful for identifying unexpected changes in data, it does not provide forecasting capabilities to predict future values. It is best for monitoring rather than prediction.

Amazon Forecast is the correct choice because it directly addresses the need for predicting future deliveries using historical and related datasets. It automates the model selection, training, and optimization process and is tailored for time-series data. Autopilot and Lambda lack specialized forecasting functions, and Lookout for Metrics is for anomaly detection rather than prediction.

Question 125

A startup wants to perform multi-node GPU training for a large NLP model with minimal setup. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Distributed Training
B) Lambda
C) AWS Glue
D) Rekognition

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Distributed Training is designed to simplify multi-node and multi-GPU ML model training. It automatically partitions data, coordinates training across nodes, and optimizes GPU utilization. For large NLP models that require significant compute, it reduces manual setup complexity and integrates seamlessly with other SageMaker services like Experiment Tracking and Model Registry.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute platform that runs code in response to events. Lambda is unsuitable for large GPU-based workloads because it has strict memory and runtime limitations and does not support GPU acceleration. It cannot handle large-scale training tasks.

AWS Glue is an ETL service for data transformation and preparation. While Glue can process large datasets, it is not designed for training ML models on GPU infrastructure. Glue focuses on moving and cleaning data rather than training models efficiently.

Amazon Rekognition is a computer vision service that provides pre-trained models and custom label capabilities for image and video analysis. It is specialized for visual data and does not support NLP model training or distributed GPU workloads.

SageMaker Distributed Training is the correct option because it directly addresses the need for multi-node, multi-GPU training with minimal configuration. Lambda cannot handle GPU workloads, Glue is ETL-only, and Rekognition is vision-focused. Distributed Training provides a managed, scalable solution tailored for large NLP models.

Question 126

A company wants to deploy reinforcement learning models to edge devices with versioning and updates. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Edge Manager
B) SageMaker Processing
C) AWS Batch
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Edge Manager is designed specifically for deploying, monitoring, and maintaining machine learning models on edge devices. It provides tools to package models, handle version control, distribute updates efficiently, and monitor model performance remotely. For reinforcement learning models, which may require frequent updates or optimization, Edge Manager ensures that edge devices always have the latest validated model versions, while maintaining security and operational consistency.

SageMaker Processing focuses on running data preprocessing and postprocessing workloads in a managed, distributed environment. While it supports custom containers and scaling for heavy computational tasks, it does not provide tools for edge deployment, model versioning, or device management. It is useful for preparing datasets, transforming features, or performing large-scale analytics before training models, but it is not intended for deploying models to hardware at the edge.

AWS Batch is a managed service for running large-scale batch computing workloads. It can schedule jobs and handle resource allocation efficiently, but it does not include any functionality for deploying ML models to devices or managing versions on remote hardware. It is primarily aimed at compute-heavy batch workloads rather than ML-specific deployment pipelines.

AWS Glue is an ETL service for extracting, transforming, and loading data across data stores. Glue can orchestrate data workflows and transform structured or unstructured datasets, but it does not support ML model deployment or monitoring on edge devices. Its primary purpose is data preparation rather than inference or deployment.

Considering these options, SageMaker Edge Manager is clearly the correct choice. It is specifically built to manage machine learning models on edge devices, providing secure deployment, monitoring, and versioning capabilities. The other options either focus on data processing or general-purpose compute tasks and do not meet the requirements for managing RL models at the edge.

Question 127

A team wants to track ML experiments, including hyperparameters, datasets, and metrics, with visual comparisons. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Experiments
B) SageMaker Data Wrangler
C) SageMaker Canvas
D) SageMaker Edge Manager

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Experiments provides a structured framework to organize, track, and compare ML experiments. It allows users to capture training runs, associated hyperparameters, input datasets, and evaluation metrics. Teams can visually compare multiple trials, analyze performance trends, and identify the best-performing model configurations. It is particularly helpful for iterative experimentation and reproducibility.

SageMaker Data Wrangler is primarily a visual feature engineering tool. It supports data preprocessing, transformations, and dataset preparation for ML models, but it does not track experiments, hyperparameters, or metrics. Its focus is on preparing data for training rather than managing the experiment lifecycle.

SageMaker Canvas provides a no-code interface for business analysts and non-developers to build and deploy models. While it simplifies model creation, it does not provide detailed experiment tracking or hyperparameter comparison. It abstracts much of the underlying experimentation, which is unsuitable for teams needing in-depth tracking.

SageMaker Edge Manager, as discussed previously, focuses on deploying, monitoring, and versioning models at the edge. It does not offer tools for experiment tracking or metrics visualization in the training process.

SageMaker Experiments is the correct choice because it is purpose-built for capturing and visualizing the complete history of ML experiments. Unlike the other services, it allows detailed comparisons of hyperparameters, datasets, and metrics, supporting reproducibility and decision-making during model development.

Question 128

A company wants to monitor ML model bias and explainability in deployed predictions. Which service is appropriate?

A) SageMaker Clarify
B) SageMaker Model Monitor
C) CloudWatch Metrics
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Clarify is designed to assess model bias, fairness, and explainability. It provides tools to detect potential biases in training datasets, quantify fairness metrics for model predictions, and generate explainability reports that show feature importance and decision contributions. Clarify helps organizations meet ethical and regulatory requirements around AI transparency and fairness.

SageMaker Model Monitor focuses on detecting performance drift, monitoring prediction quality, and alerting on data anomalies over time. While it tracks deployed models’ behavior, it does not provide comprehensive bias or explainability analysis. Its purpose is operational monitoring rather than ethical or interpretability assessment.

CloudWatch Metrics is a monitoring service for AWS infrastructure and application performance. It can track resource utilization, latency, and other system-level metrics, but it cannot evaluate ML model bias, fairness, or feature contributions. Its monitoring capabilities are limited to operational observability.

AWS Glue is an ETL service for managing, cleaning, and transforming datasets. It is unrelated to model bias detection or explainability. While it supports preprocessing, it does not analyze ML predictions for fairness or interpretability.

SageMaker Clarify is the correct choice because it is purpose-built for evaluating bias and explainability. The other options either focus on infrastructure monitoring, general ML model operational health, or data processing, none of which provide the specialized fairness and interpretability insights Clarify offers.

Question 129

A company wants to preprocess large-scale image data using a managed distributed ML environment integrated with S3. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Processing
B) Amazon EMR
C) AWS Glue
D) EC2 Auto Scaling

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Processing provides a managed environment to run distributed preprocessing and postprocessing tasks. It supports custom containers, large-scale computation, and native integration with S3, allowing users to efficiently prepare datasets for ML training. It is particularly suitable for image data, where transformations, resizing, and augmentations can be applied at scale.

Amazon EMR is a managed big data platform for processing large datasets using frameworks such as Hadoop or Spark. While EMR can handle distributed image processing, it is not specialized for ML workflows and requires more setup and configuration. Its focus is general-purpose data processing rather than purpose-built ML preprocessing.

AWS Glue is an ETL service for structured and unstructured data transformation. It is optimized for preparing tabular datasets and pipelines but is not intended for large-scale image processing or custom ML preprocessing tasks. Glue cannot easily execute image-specific transformations at scale.

EC2 Auto Scaling allows scaling of virtual machines to handle variable workloads. While it provides raw compute resources, users must manually orchestrate data preprocessing jobs, which adds operational complexity. It does not provide managed ML preprocessing workflows or direct integration with S3.

SageMaker Processing is the correct choice because it combines distributed compute, S3 integration, and ML-specific preprocessing capabilities in a fully managed environment. The other options either focus on general data processing or require manual orchestration without ML-focused tools.

Question 130

A company wants to run large-scale batch inference without real-time requirements. Which service is most appropriate?

A) SageMaker Batch Transform
B) SageMaker Real-Time Inference
C) SageMaker Serverless Inference
D) AWS Lambda

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Batch Transform is designed for running large-scale, asynchronous batch inference on pre-trained models. It efficiently processes large datasets in parallel, handles input/output in S3, and is optimized for workloads where real-time response is not required. It allows scaling compute resources automatically to meet batch requirements.

SageMaker Real-Time Inference is built for low-latency, online prediction requests. While it provides instant responses, it is less efficient for large batch workloads because it is optimized for serving individual or small sets of requests continuously.

SageMaker Serverless Inference removes the need to manage endpoints and scales automatically, but it is also optimized for sporadic, lightweight, or low-latency requests. For large-scale batch scoring, it can be less cost-effective and slower than Batch Transform.

AWS Lambda provides general-purpose serverless compute for event-driven applications. While it can run ML inference, it is limited by execution time, memory, and compute power, making it unsuitable for large-scale batch processing.

SageMaker Batch Transform is the correct choice because it is purpose-built for asynchronous, high-volume batch inference. The other options are optimized for real-time, small-scale, or event-driven inference scenarios rather than bulk scoring of large datasets.

Question 131

A startup wants to detect anomalies in business metrics automatically. Which AWS service is appropriate?

A) Lookout for Metrics
B) Amazon Forecast
C) SageMaker Autopilot
D) AWS Lambda

Answer: A

Explanation:

Lookout for Metrics is a fully managed service specifically designed to detect anomalies in business and operational metrics automatically. It uses machine learning to analyze time-series data from multiple sources and surfaces unusual changes or deviations. The service handles underlying model creation, tuning, and detection pipelines, allowing companies to identify issues like sudden drops in sales, spikes in website traffic, or unusual operational metrics without building custom ML models.

Amazon Forecast, on the other hand, is focused on predicting future values of time-series data rather than detecting anomalies. It can generate forecasts for demand, sales, or other metrics by learning from historical data and related datasets. While Forecast is excellent for planning and trend analysis, it does not automatically identify sudden or unexpected deviations that constitute anomalies.

SageMaker Autopilot is an automated machine learning service that builds and trains models for classification or regression tasks based on user-provided datasets. Although Autopilot streamlines the ML workflow and can be used to predict outcomes, it is not specialized for anomaly detection and would require manual feature engineering and model evaluation to identify outliers in metrics data.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that executes code in response to triggers. While Lambda is versatile and can process data or integrate with other AWS services, it does not provide any built-in anomaly detection capabilities. Using Lambda for anomaly detection would require custom code and additional ML infrastructure, which is more complex and less efficient than using a dedicated service.

Lookout for Metrics is the most suitable choice because it directly addresses the startup’s requirement of automatically detecting anomalies in business metrics. It minimizes manual intervention, leverages time-series ML models, and provides operational alerts, whereas the other options either focus on prediction, automation, or raw computation without built-in anomaly detection.

Question 132

A healthcare company needs to label sensitive images securely with HIPAA compliance. Which service should they choose?

A) SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce
B) Mechanical Turk
C) AWS Batch
D) Rekognition Custom Labels

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce provides a secure environment for human labeling of data with HIPAA compliance. It allows organizations to create a private workforce within a virtual private cloud (VPC), ensuring that sensitive images, such as medical scans, are labeled safely. The service includes audit logging, access controls, and secure data handling, making it suitable for industries with strict regulatory requirements.

Mechanical Turk is a public crowdsourcing platform where tasks are performed by a distributed, anonymous workforce. It is not designed for HIPAA-compliant workflows, as sensitive medical data cannot be safely shared with the general public. Using Mechanical Turk in this context would violate privacy regulations and create significant security risks.

AWS Batch is a managed service for executing batch computing workloads. While it can process large volumes of data, it does not provide any human labeling capabilities or secure compliance for sensitive data. Batch is suited for data processing or computational tasks, not for regulated image annotation.

Rekognition Custom Labels enables automatic labeling of images by training models to recognize specific objects or patterns. However, it relies on machine learning predictions rather than human verification and does not offer HIPAA-compliant private labeling workflows. For sensitive healthcare data requiring careful human review, this option is insufficient.

Ultimately, SageMaker Ground Truth Private Workforce is the correct choice because it combines the security and compliance required for HIPAA-sensitive data with managed human labeling. The other options either lack privacy controls, human verification, or compliance guarantees.

Question 133

A team wants to deploy thousands of small ML models efficiently on a single endpoint, loading models dynamically. Which feature should they use?

A) SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints
B) SageMaker Asynchronous Inference
C) ECS Auto Scaling
D) EC2 Spot Instances

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Multi-Model Endpoints are designed to host multiple models on a single endpoint efficiently. Models are loaded from S3 dynamically into memory only when needed, which reduces memory usage and cost. This is ideal for scenarios where thousands of small models need to be served simultaneously, allowing the endpoint to scale without manually managing multiple instances.

SageMaker Asynchronous Inference is designed for processing large payloads or requests that may take time to compute. While it allows non-blocking inference, it does not support dynamically hosting multiple models on a single endpoint. Each model still requires dedicated deployment, making it less efficient for large-scale model hosting.

ECS Auto Scaling allows containers to scale automatically in response to load. While ECS can host ML models, it requires custom orchestration to manage multiple models and endpoints, which adds operational overhead. It does not inherently provide dynamic model loading like Multi-Model Endpoints.

EC2 Spot Instances provide cost-effective compute resources that can be used to host models, but they require manual setup and management. They do not offer a service-level abstraction for dynamically loading models on demand, nor do they simplify deployment at the scale of thousands of models.

Therefore, Multi-Model Endpoints are the optimal solution because they are purpose-built for efficiently hosting multiple models, reduce operational complexity, and dynamically manage memory usage.

Question 134

A company wants to forecast deliveries across multiple locations using historical and related datasets. Which service should they use?

A) Amazon Forecast
B) SageMaker Autopilot
C) AWS Lambda
D) Lookout for Metrics

Answer: A

Explanation:

Amazon Forecast is a fully managed service for creating highly accurate forecasts using time-series data. It can handle historical delivery data, related datasets such as holidays or promotions, and multiple items across different locations. Forecast uses ML models behind the scenes to automate trend and seasonality detection, producing predictions that help optimize planning and resource allocation.

SageMaker Autopilot is an automated ML service that builds models for general predictive tasks. While it can generate forecasts if properly trained, it is not optimized for time-series forecasting and requires manual dataset preparation, model selection, and validation, which adds complexity.

AWS Lambda is a compute service that executes code in response to triggers. It does not provide any native forecasting capability. Using Lambda for forecasting would require custom model implementation and additional infrastructure, making it impractical for scalable, automated predictions.

Lookout for Metrics is specialized for detecting anomalies in metrics data. It identifies unusual patterns but does not generate forecasts. It is useful for alerting to unexpected changes but cannot provide forward-looking predictions for planning deliveries.

Thus, Amazon Forecast is the best choice because it directly addresses the need for multi-location, data-driven delivery predictions using historical and related data, offering a fully managed, ML-powered solution.

Question 135

A startup wants to run multi-node GPU training for a large NLP model with minimal setup. Which service is best?

A) SageMaker Distributed Training
B) Lambda
C) AWS Glue
D) Rekognition

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Distributed Training is a service designed to simplify the process of training large machine learning models across multiple nodes and GPUs. It automatically manages the complexities of distributed training, including data and model parallelism, inter-node communication, networking, and scaling. This allows data scientists and ML engineers to train models efficiently without needing deep expertise in distributed systems. The service is particularly well-suited for training large natural language processing (NLP) models, which often require significant compute resources and careful orchestration to optimize training speed and performance. SageMaker Distributed Training also handles checkpointing and fault tolerance, ensuring that long-running training jobs can recover from interruptions and continue without losing progress.

The service supports major ML frameworks such as PyTorch, TensorFlow, and MXNet, allowing teams to use their preferred framework while taking advantage of distributed GPU acceleration. By abstracting away the complexities of multi-node orchestration, SageMaker Distributed Training reduces operational overhead, enabling teams to focus on model design and experimentation rather than infrastructure management. Its integration with SageMaker also allows seamless deployment of trained models, monitoring, and hyperparameter tuning in a unified workflow.

AWS Lambda, in contrast, is a serverless compute service designed for lightweight, event-driven workloads. While it excels at executing short-lived functions in response to triggers, Lambda cannot leverage GPUs, has limited memory and runtime duration, and is not designed for intensive computation. These limitations make Lambda unsuitable for training large-scale NLP models, which require substantial GPU resources and extended compute time. While Lambda is excellent for tasks like inference on small models, simple data processing, or orchestrating pipelines, it cannot handle the parallelized, resource-intensive operations necessary for high-performance distributed training.

AWS Glue is primarily an ETL (extract, transform, load) service, aimed at preparing, cleaning, and transforming large datasets for analytics or downstream processing. Although it can process data at scale, it is not a machine learning training service and does not provide GPU acceleration or distributed training capabilities. Glue is designed to handle data workflows rather than model training, so it does not address the requirements of large-scale NLP model training.

Amazon Rekognition is a specialized computer vision service used for analyzing images and videos, including object detection, facial recognition, and content moderation. It is not designed for natural language processing or GPU-based model training, making it irrelevant in scenarios that involve training large NLP models.

Overall, SageMaker Distributed Training is the correct choice because it is purpose-built for efficiently training large ML models across multiple GPUs and nodes. It reduces operational complexity, provides automatic scaling and fault tolerance, and integrates with popular ML frameworks, making it ideal for high-performance NLP model training.

Question 136

A company wants to deploy RL models to edge devices with version control and updates. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Edge Manager
B) SageMaker Processing
C) AWS Batch
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Edge Manager is specifically designed for deploying machine learning models, including reinforcement learning models, to edge devices. It allows teams to package models in a secure format, deploy them to multiple devices, monitor their performance, and perform controlled updates. Edge Manager also supports model versioning, making it easier to roll back or update models without disrupting ongoing operations. This ensures consistent behavior and traceability across all devices, which is critical for reinforcement learning scenarios where models are continually evolving.

SageMaker Processing, on the other hand, focuses on preprocessing and postprocessing data at scale. It provides a managed environment for running scripts or containers that transform or clean data before model training or after inference. While it is useful for data pipelines, it does not provide deployment, versioning, or monitoring capabilities for models on edge devices, so it is not suited for this scenario.

AWS Batch is a managed service that efficiently runs large-scale batch computing jobs. It is ideal for high-volume processing or simulations that can run asynchronously. However, it does not handle ML model deployment to devices, manage versions, or provide continuous monitoring for models, making it unsuitable for edge deployment requirements.

AWS Glue is primarily an ETL service designed to extract, transform, and load data between various sources. It is optimized for data preparation and integration rather than model deployment. While Glue can move and transform data for machine learning pipelines, it does not handle model packaging, edge device deployment, or version control.

SageMaker Edge Manager is the correct choice because it uniquely combines deployment, version management, and monitoring for ML models on edge devices. Its capabilities align perfectly with the need for continuous updates and secure, managed rollout of reinforcement learning models.

Question 137

A team wants to track ML experiments including metrics, hyperparameters, and datasets with visual comparison. Which service is correct?

A) SageMaker Experiments
B) SageMaker Data Wrangler
C) SageMaker Canvas
D) SageMaker Edge Manager

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Experiments is designed to track and organize ML experiments efficiently. It captures information from training runs, including hyperparameters, metrics, datasets, and model artifacts. Users can visualize the results of multiple experiments, compare runs side by side, and identify the best-performing models. This helps teams maintain an organized workflow when iterating through multiple ML experiments and ensures reproducibility.

SageMaker Data Wrangler focuses on data preparation and feature engineering. It provides a visual interface for cleaning, transforming, and analyzing datasets before model training. While it simplifies feature creation and integration into ML pipelines, it does not provide experiment tracking or hyperparameter comparison, making it unsuitable for this requirement.

SageMaker Canvas offers a no-code environment for building and deploying ML models. It is geared toward business analysts or users without programming experience, allowing them to create models without writing code. Although convenient for generating predictions, it lacks experiment tracking and detailed comparison of metrics and hyperparameters.

SageMaker Edge Manager is designed for managing ML models on edge devices, including deployment, monitoring, and versioning. While powerful for edge scenarios, it does not track the metrics, datasets, or hyperparameters of experiments in the development phase, which is the focus of this question.

SageMaker Experiments is the clear choice because it provides centralized tracking of experiments, visual comparison of runs, and detailed insights into hyperparameters and datasets. Its purpose-built design for experiment management makes it ideal for teams looking to systematically evaluate and compare ML models.

Question 138

A company wants to monitor ML model bias and explainability. Which service should they use?

A) SageMaker Clarify
B) SageMaker Model Monitor
C) CloudWatch Metrics
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Clarify is a purpose-built service for detecting bias in machine learning models and providing explainability insights. It enables teams to evaluate both pre-training data and post-training model outputs to identify potential sources of bias. This is critical because bias can originate from datasets, labeling processes, or model behavior, and addressing it early ensures that models perform fairly across different groups. Clarify also generates explainability reports, which highlight the contribution of each feature to the model’s predictions. These reports help stakeholders understand why a model makes certain decisions and facilitate trust, transparency, and accountability, particularly in regulated industries such as finance, healthcare, or government, where fairness and compliance are essential.

SageMaker Model Monitor, by comparison, focuses on monitoring deployed models for data and prediction drift over time. It tracks the quality of model outputs and detects deviations in input features or prediction distributions. While Model Monitor is extremely useful for maintaining model performance in production, it does not provide direct insights into bias or feature-level explainability. Therefore, it cannot address the specific need for fairness evaluation or decision transparency that Clarify handles.

CloudWatch Metrics is designed primarily for monitoring the performance and operational health of AWS resources. It can track CPU usage, memory utilization, latency, and other system-level metrics for applications and infrastructure. However, CloudWatch does not analyze model behavior, identify bias, or provide explanations for predictions. Its capabilities are limited to resource monitoring, so it cannot satisfy the requirements of evaluating fairness or generating actionable insights into ML models.

AWS Glue is an extract, transform, and load (ETL) service used for cleaning, preparing, and transforming datasets. While it can process large amounts of data and integrate with other AWS services, it does not offer any functionality related to bias detection, fairness assessment, or explainability for machine learning models. Its role is confined to data workflow management rather than model evaluation.

SageMaker Clarify is the correct choice because it is explicitly designed to provide comprehensive bias detection and explainability capabilities. It evaluates datasets and models, identifies potential fairness issues, and generates interpretable insights into how models make decisions. By leveraging Clarify, teams can ensure that their ML models are fair, transparent, and compliant with regulatory standards, which is essential for building trustworthy and responsible AI solutions.

Question 139

A company wants to preprocess images at scale with a managed distributed ML service integrated with S3. Which service is appropriate?

A) SageMaker Processing
B) EMR
C) AWS Glue
D) EC2 Auto Scaling

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Processing provides a managed environment to preprocess, transform, and analyze large-scale datasets, including images. It supports distributed processing, allowing workloads to scale automatically, and integrates seamlessly with S3 for input and output data. Custom scripts or containers can be run to prepare data for training, making it ideal for ML preprocessing pipelines.

Amazon EMR is a big data service for running distributed frameworks such as Hadoop and Spark. It can process large datasets but is general-purpose, requiring more configuration and management compared to SageMaker Processing. EMR is more suitable for traditional big data workflows rather than ML-specific preprocessing.

AWS Glue focuses on ETL tasks, providing automated data preparation and integration for analytics. While useful for structured data, Glue is not optimized for ML preprocessing tasks such as image transformations or distributed feature engineering.

EC2 Auto Scaling adjusts compute capacity based on demand but does not provide managed preprocessing or distributed ML pipelines. It requires manual orchestration of tasks and integration with data storage, making it less efficient for large-scale ML preprocessing.

SageMaker Processing is the most appropriate service because it combines managed distributed compute, easy S3 integration, and flexibility for ML preprocessing. It reduces operational complexity while allowing scalable transformations.

Question 140

A company wants to run large-scale batch inference without requiring real-time predictions. Which service is best?

A) SageMaker Batch Transform
B) SageMaker Real-Time Inference
C) SageMaker Serverless Inference
D) AWS Lambda

Answer: A

Explanation:

SageMaker Batch Transform is a service specifically designed to handle large-scale, offline batch inference. It allows organizations to process vast datasets efficiently by leveraging managed compute clusters, without the need to set up or maintain real-time endpoints. Batch Transform works seamlessly with S3 for both input and output, enabling scalable scoring of pre-existing datasets. This makes it ideal for scenarios where predictions are required on large volumes of data at once, such as monthly reports, bulk recommendation generation, or scoring datasets for downstream analytics. By using managed infrastructure, it abstracts away the complexity of scaling, distributing workloads, and managing compute resources, allowing data scientists to focus on the inference logic rather than operational concerns.

SageMaker Real-Time Inference, in contrast, is built for online prediction scenarios that require low-latency responses. It is optimized for applications such as recommendation engines, fraud detection, or dynamic pricing, where immediate predictions are critical. While Real-Time Inference excels in delivering fast responses for individual requests, it is not cost-efficient or practical for batch workloads that do not need immediate results. Running large-scale batch inference through a real-time endpoint would result in unnecessary infrastructure costs and complexity.

SageMaker Serverless Inference provides on-demand compute resources for real-time predictions without requiring endpoint management. It simplifies operational overhead and is useful for applications with unpredictable or intermittent workloads. However, it is intended for sporadic online inference rather than consistently processing large volumes of data. Serverless Inference cannot efficiently handle high-throughput batch workloads, making it less suitable for scenarios where large datasets must be scored simultaneously.

AWS Lambda is a general-purpose serverless compute service designed for lightweight tasks or event-driven processing. It is highly effective for functions triggered by events, such as file uploads or API requests, but it is limited in execution time, memory, and overall compute capacity. These constraints make Lambda unsuitable for high-volume batch inference workflows, which often require longer runtime and greater parallel processing capabilities than Lambda can provide.

SageMaker Batch Transform is the correct choice because it is purpose-built for offline batch inference at scale. It provides optimized infrastructure, seamless integration with S3, and the ability to process large datasets efficiently without requiring low-latency endpoints. Unlike real-time or serverless inference options, Batch Transform balances cost, scalability, and throughput, making it ideal for organizations that need to perform large-scale scoring on existing datasets efficiently.