Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam  Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 6 Q 101-120

Visit here for our full Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 101:

 You are training a deep learning model for fraud detection in financial transactions. The dataset contains millions of legitimate transactions but only a few thousand fraudulent transactions. Which approach is most effective to improve detection of fraudulent transactions?

A) Use class-weighted loss or focal loss to emphasize the minority class.
B) Remove legitimate transactions to balance the dataset.
C) Train with standard cross-entropy loss without modification.
D) Reduce the number of layers in the neural network.

Answer: A) Use class-weighted loss or focal loss to emphasize the minority class.

Explanation:

 Fraud detection is a classic example of highly imbalanced classification problems. In these cases, the majority class (legitimate transactions) vastly outnumbers the minority class (fraudulent transactions). If the model is trained with standard loss functions without addressing this imbalance, it will overwhelmingly predict the majority class, achieving high accuracy superficially but failing at detecting fraudulent transactions, which is the primary objective.

A) Class-weighted loss assigns higher importance to the minority class during training. This ensures that errors in predicting fraudulent transactions contribute more to the loss, prompting the model to focus on learning features that differentiate fraud from legitimate transactions. Focal loss further improves performance by down-weighting easy examples (mostly legitimate transactions) and emphasizing hard-to-classify examples, which are often fraudulent. These methods allow the model to learn meaningful patterns despite extreme imbalance, improving metrics like recall and F1 score for fraud detection. Weighted losses are widely used in applications like credit card fraud detection, insurance claims analysis, and anomaly detection in large-scale transactional datasets.

B) Removing legitimate transactions to balance the dataset artificially reduces the class imbalance but discards critical data about normal behavior. This can result in poor generalization and high false positive rates, as the model no longer sees a comprehensive representation of legitimate transactions. In financial applications, high false positives are costly and reduce trust in the system.

C) Training with standard cross-entropy loss without modification ignores the imbalance problem. The model will mostly predict legitimate transactions, leading to extremely low recall for fraud cases. This makes the model ineffective in practice, despite potentially high overall accuracy.

D) Reducing the number of layers may prevent overfitting but does not address the class imbalance problem. The network will still be biased toward majority-class transactions, and detection of fraudulent transactions will remain poor.

Class-weighted or focal loss is the most effective approach to improve detection of rare fraudulent transactions, ensuring the model learns discriminative features while maintaining generalization across all transactions.

Question 102:

 You are developing a recommendation system for an online marketplace. Many products are new, and most users have interacted with only a few items. Which approach is most effective to generate relevant recommendations under these conditions?

A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.
B) Remove new items from the recommendation pool.
C) Recommend only the most popular items.
D) Rely solely on collaborative filtering.

Answer: A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.

Explanation:

Online marketplaces often face cold-start problems: new users have little interaction history, and new products have no historical interactions. Collaborative filtering relies on user-item interaction data, which is sparse in these cases, making recommendations unreliable for new users or items. Content-based filtering leverages product attributes (e.g., category, description, price) to generate recommendations even when interaction data is sparse.

A) Hybrid systems combine collaborative filtering and content-based approaches. Content-based filtering handles cold-start scenarios by recommending items similar to those a user has already interacted with, while collaborative filtering personalizes recommendations as more interactions accumulate. For example, a newly added smartphone can be recommended to a user who likes electronics based on its features and category, even without historical purchase data. Hybrid systems improve recommendation relevance, coverage, and diversity while mitigating cold-start challenges. This approach is widely adopted in e-commerce, streaming platforms, and social media recommendation systems to maintain user engagement.

B) Removing new items from the recommendation pool reduces the number of discoverable products, limiting user engagement and satisfaction.

C) Recommending only the most popular items maximizes short-term engagement but fails to personalize recommendations. Users with niche interests will likely find recommendations irrelevant, decreasing retention.

D) Relying solely on collaborative filtering fails in cold-start scenarios, as new items and new users lack sufficient interaction data for meaningful recommendations.

A hybrid recommendation system is the most practical solution for dynamic marketplaces with sparse interaction histories and constantly added items, balancing immediate recommendations with long-term personalization.

Question 103:

You are building a time series forecasting model for energy consumption. The series exhibits long-term trends, daily cycles, seasonal spikes, and holiday effects. Which approach is most suitable?

A) Use a model capable of handling multiple seasonalities and trend, such as Prophet or TBATS.
B) Ignore seasonality and rely on standard ARIMA.
C) Train a linear regression on raw values.
D) Aggregate data to remove high-frequency fluctuations.

Answer: A) Use a model capable of handling multiple seasonalities and trend, such as Prophet or TBATS.

Explanation

 Energy consumption data exhibit complex patterns including long-term trends (e.g., increasing overall usage), daily cycles (e.g., peak evening demand), seasonal spikes (e.g., heating in winter or cooling in summer), and special holiday effects. Capturing these overlapping patterns accurately is critical for grid management, energy procurement, and operational efficiency.

A) Prophet decomposes the time series into trend, multiple seasonal components, and holiday effects. It handles missing data, non-linear trends, and irregular seasonal spikes. TBATS models multiple seasonalities using Fourier terms, along with Box-Cox transformations, ARMA errors, and trend components. These models explicitly account for overlapping cycles and external events, producing highly accurate forecasts. For example, knowing peak demand during a summer heatwave enables operators to allocate generation capacity efficiently and avoid outages.

B) Standard ARIMA may capture trends and short-term autocorrelation but cannot model multiple overlapping seasonalities, leading to systematic forecast errors during peak periods.

C) Linear regression on raw values cannot capture non-linear trends or multiple seasonalities. Predictions would fail to account for daily or seasonal peaks, reducing forecast reliability.

D) Aggregating data smooths high-frequency fluctuations but removes critical patterns such as daily cycles and holiday spikes, making forecasts less actionable.

Models like Prophet or TBATS provide accurate, operationally useful forecasts for energy consumption, capturing both trend and multiple seasonalities.

Question 104:

 You are training a multi-label text classification model. Some labels are rare, resulting in low recall for these categories. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.
B) Remove rare labels from the dataset.
C) Treat the task as multi-class classification using categorical cross-entropy.
D) Train only on examples with frequent labels.

Answer: A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.

Explanation:

 Multi-label classification allows instances to belong to multiple categories. Rare labels are underrepresented, causing standard loss functions to underweight them, resulting in low recall. Improving recall for rare labels is essential in applications like medical coding, document tagging, and multi-topic classification.

A) Binary cross-entropy treats each label independently, making it suitable for multi-label tasks. Applying class weights inversely proportional to label frequency ensures rare labels contribute more to the loss, focusing the model on learning these underrepresented categories. This approach improves recall while maintaining performance on frequent labels. Weighted binary cross-entropy is widely used in imbalanced multi-label scenarios to ensure balanced learning and high coverage.

B) Removing rare labels simplifies the dataset but eliminates important categories, reducing predictive coverage and practical utility.

C) Treating the problem as multi-class classification assumes each instance has a single label. This violates the multi-label structure and ignores multiple rare labels in a single instance, reducing predictive performance.

D) Training only on frequent labels excludes rare categories entirely, guaranteeing poor recall and coverage.

Weighted binary cross-entropy ensures balanced learning across all labels, making it the most effective solution for rare-label multi-label classification.

Question 105:

You are training a convolutional neural network (CNN) for image classification. The model performs well on training data but poorly on validation data. Which approach is most effective to improve generalization?

A) Apply data augmentation techniques such as rotations, flips, and color jittering.
B) Increase the number of convolutional layers.
C) Reduce the number of filters in convolutional layers.
D) Train for fewer epochs to avoid overfitting.

Answer: A) Apply data augmentation techniques such as rotations, flips, and color jittering.

Explanation:

 High training accuracy with low validation performance indicates overfitting: the model memorizes the training data but fails to generalize to unseen examples. Overfitting is common in CNNs, especially when the dataset is small or lacks diversity.

A) Data augmentation artificially increases the effective dataset size by applying transformations such as rotations, flips, scaling, cropping, and color jittering. This encourages the network to learn invariant features rather than memorizing specific examples. For instance, a classifier should recognize a dog regardless of orientation, scale, or lighting. Data augmentation reduces overfitting, improves generalization, and is widely used in computer vision tasks including object recognition, medical imaging, and autonomous driving.

B) Increasing convolutional layers increases model capacity, which may worsen overfitting if data is limited. More layers alone do not address lack of variability.

C) Reducing the number of filters reduces capacity, potentially preventing overfitting but risking underfitting, where the network cannot learn sufficient features.

D) Training for fewer epochs may reduce overfitting but risks undertraining, preventing the model from learning essential patterns.

Data augmentation is the most effective approach to improve generalization, providing realistic variability that allows the network to perform well on unseen data without sacrificing accuracy.

Question 106:

 You are building a reinforcement learning (RL) agent to control a drone in a 3D environment. The agent receives sparse rewards only when reaching specific waypoints. Which approach is most effective to accelerate learning?

A) Implement reward shaping to provide intermediate feedback.
B) Reduce the discount factor to prioritize immediate rewards.
C) Increase the replay buffer size.
D) Eliminate random exploration to focus on the current best policy.

Answer: A) Implement reward shaping to provide intermediate feedback.

Explanation:

 Sparse reward settings in reinforcement learning pose a major challenge because the agent receives feedback infrequently. When rewards are only provided after reaching distant waypoints, the agent may require a prohibitively large number of episodes to discover a sequence of actions that lead to the goal. Without frequent feedback, gradient signals are weak, making policy learning slow or even impossible.

A) Reward shaping introduces intermediate rewards to guide the agent toward the goal. For a drone navigating a 3D environment, reward shaping could involve giving positive signals when the drone moves closer to waypoints, maintains altitude stability, or avoids obstacles. This increases the density of feedback, enabling the agent to learn useful behaviors much faster. Potential-based reward shaping ensures that the optimal policy remains unchanged while accelerating convergence. This technique is widely used in robotics, autonomous navigation, and simulated gaming environments to handle sparse-reward challenges.

B) Reducing the discount factor emphasizes immediate rewards over long-term outcomes. In sparse reward scenarios, this can prevent the agent from learning strategies that require long sequences of actions to reach a distant goal, leading to suboptimal policies.

C) Increasing the replay buffer allows storage of past experiences for reuse, which improves sample efficiency. However, in sparse reward environments, the buffer mainly contains uninformative transitions, which do not provide meaningful gradient signals for learning.

D) Eliminating random exploration reduces the chance of discovering rewarding states, which is critical in sparse-reward environments. Without exploration, the agent may never encounter positive rewards, preventing effective policy improvement.

Reward shaping is the most effective approach for sparse-reward RL tasks, as it provides consistent feedback that accelerates learning while preserving the optimal policy.

Question 107:

You are training a multi-class text classification model with thousands of categories. The softmax computation is slow due to the high output dimensionality. Which approach is most effective to reduce computation?

A) Use hierarchical softmax or sampled softmax.
B) Remove rare classes to reduce output size.
C) Train with very small batch sizes.
D) Apply L1 regularization to sparsify the model.

Answer: A) Use hierarchical softmax or sampled softmax.

Explanation:

 High-dimensional multi-class classification problems are computationally expensive because calculating the full softmax involves exponentials and normalization over all classes. With thousands of categories, this becomes a significant bottleneck during training, consuming large amounts of memory and slowing gradient updates.

A) Hierarchical softmax organizes classes into a tree structure. To compute the probability of a specific class, the model traverses the tree from the root to the leaf, reducing computational complexity from O(n) to O(log n) per example, where n is the number of classes. Sampled softmax approximates the full softmax by considering a subset of negative classes in each training step, reducing computation while maintaining unbiased gradient estimates. Both methods allow efficient training without sacrificing model accuracy and are widely used in natural language processing tasks such as language modeling and large-scale document classification.

B) Removing rare classes reduces output dimensionality but eliminates coverage for important categories. Even infrequent classes may be critical in real-world applications, making this approach impractical.

C) Training with very small batch sizes reduces memory requirements per batch but does not reduce the computational cost of computing softmax across thousands of classes. It may also increase gradient variance, slowing convergence.

D) L1 regularization sparsifies the model weights but does not affect the cost of softmax computation. Sparsifying weights alone does not solve the computational bottleneck.

Hierarchical or sampled softmax is the most effective solution for large-scale multi-class classification, providing efficiency without compromising accuracy or coverage.

Question 108:

 You are training a convolutional neural network (CNN) for medical image segmentation. Some regions of interest (ROIs) are very small compared to the background. Which approach is most effective to improve segmentation performance on small ROIs?

A) Use a loss function such as Dice loss or focal loss.
B) Increase convolutional kernel size.
C) Downsample images to reduce computational cost.
D) Use standard cross-entropy loss without modification.

Answer: A) Use a loss function such as Dice loss or focal loss.

Explanation:

 In medical image segmentation, the background often dominates the image while the clinically relevant ROIs are small. Standard cross-entropy loss treats all pixels equally, causing the model to focus primarily on the background, which can result in poor detection of small structures such as tumors, lesions, or organs.

A) Dice loss directly measures the overlap between predicted masks and ground-truth masks, giving higher relative importance to small ROIs. Focal loss reduces the contribution of easy-to-classify background pixels and emphasizes hard examples, often corresponding to small ROIs. Using these losses helps the model focus on correctly segmenting clinically important regions, ensuring that small ROIs are accurately identified. Dice and focal loss are widely adopted in medical imaging tasks such as tumor segmentation, organ delineation, and lesion detection, where capturing small structures accurately is critical.

B) Increasing convolutional kernel size increases receptive field but does not address class imbalance between ROIs and background. Small ROIs still contribute minimally to the loss, leaving segmentation performance poor.

C) Downsampling reduces computational cost but sacrifices fine details, which may cause small ROIs to disappear entirely from the input, making accurate segmentation impossible.

D) Standard cross-entropy loss biases the network toward background pixels, resulting in poor sensitivity to small ROIs. Without modification, the model underperforms on clinically critical regions.

Dice and focal loss effectively address challenges posed by small ROIs, improving segmentation performance and clinical reliability.

Question 109:

 You are building a recommendation system for a video streaming platform. Many new movies are added daily, and most users have sparse interaction histories. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.
B) Remove new movies from the recommendation pool.
C) Recommend only the most popular movies.
D) Rely solely on collaborative filtering.

Answer: A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.

Explanation

The scenario involves cold-start problems: new users with sparse interaction histories and new movies with no interaction data. Collaborative filtering relies on historical user-item interactions, which are insufficient in cold-start scenarios. Content-based filtering leverages metadata (e.g., genre, actors, description) to generate recommendations for new items and users.

A) Hybrid systems combine collaborative filtering and content-based approaches. Content-based filtering handles cold-start scenarios by recommending items similar to those a user has previously interacted with. Collaborative filtering refines recommendations over time as more interactions accumulate. For example, a newly released thriller movie can be recommended to a user who likes thrillers based on metadata, even without interaction data. Hybrid systems increase coverage, relevance, and diversity, ensuring effective recommendations despite sparse user history or new content.

B) Removing new movies reduces the recommendation pool, limiting discoverability and user engagement.

C) Recommending only popular movies maximizes short-term engagement but lacks personalization, which can reduce user satisfaction.

D) Relying solely on collaborative filtering fails in cold-start scenarios, as new items and users lack interaction data for meaningful predictions.

A hybrid recommendation system is the most effective solution for dynamic platforms, balancing immediate recommendations and long-term personalization.

Question 110:

 You are training a multi-label text classification model. Some labels are rare, resulting in low recall. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.
B) Remove rare labels from the dataset.
C) Treat the task as multi-class classification using categorical cross-entropy.
D) Train only on examples with frequent labels.

Answer:A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.

Explanation:

In multi-label classification, instances can belong to multiple categories. Rare labels are underrepresented, causing standard loss functions to underweight them, resulting in low recall. Improving recall for rare labels is crucial in applications like medical coding, document tagging, and multi-topic classification.

A) Binary cross-entropy treats each label independently, making it suitable for multi-label tasks. Applying class weights inversely proportional to label frequency ensures rare labels contribute more to the loss function, focusing the model on learning underrepresented categories. This improves recall for rare labels while maintaining performance on frequent labels. Weighted binary cross-entropy is widely used in imbalanced multi-label scenarios to ensure balanced learning and high coverage.

B) Removing rare labels simplifies the dataset but eliminates critical categories, reducing predictive coverage and practical utility.

C) Treating the task as multi-class classification assumes each instance has only one label. This violates the multi-label assumption and ignores multiple rare labels in a single instance, reducing predictive performance.

D) Training only on frequent labels excludes rare categories entirely, guaranteeing poor recall and limiting overall coverage.

Weighted binary cross-entropy ensures balanced learning across all labels, making it the most effective approach for improving performance on rare labels in multi-label tasks.

Question 111:

You are building a reinforcement learning (RL) agent to navigate a maze. The agent receives sparse rewards only when reaching the exit. Which approach is most effective to accelerate learning?

A) Implement reward shaping to provide intermediate feedback.
B) Reduce the discount factor to prioritize immediate rewards.
C) Increase the replay buffer size.
D) Eliminate random exploration to focus on the current best policy.

Answer: A) Implement reward shaping to provide intermediate feedback.

Explanation

 Sparse reward scenarios are notoriously difficult in reinforcement learning. In a maze navigation task, the agent only receives a positive reward upon reaching the exit. Without intermediate feedback, it is difficult for the agent to learn which actions bring it closer to the goal. The sparsity of rewards leads to weak gradient signals, causing the learning process to be extremely slow or unstable.

A) Reward shaping introduces additional signals to guide the agent. For instance, in a maze, the agent can be rewarded for reducing its distance to the exit, visiting new corridors, or avoiding obstacles. This technique increases the frequency of informative feedback, allowing the agent to understand which actions are beneficial. Potential-based reward shaping ensures that the introduction of additional rewards does not change the optimal policy but accelerates convergence. This method is widely adopted in robotics, game AI, and autonomous navigation where sparse reward structures are common. By providing intermediate feedback, reward shaping helps the agent develop effective exploration strategies and converge faster to optimal policies.

B) Reducing the discount factor places more emphasis on immediate rewards. In sparse reward environments, this is counterproductive because distant rewards are critical for learning. If the agent only considers immediate rewards, it may fail to learn sequences of actions required to reach the exit, resulting in suboptimal navigation policies.

C) Increasing the replay buffer allows the agent to reuse past experiences, improving sample efficiency. However, in sparse reward scenarios, most experiences contain no reward signal. Consequently, replaying these uninformative experiences does little to help the agent learn, and the fundamental sparsity problem remains unaddressed.

D) Eliminating random exploration limits the agent to its current policy, reducing the likelihood of discovering rewarding states. Exploration is essential in sparse reward tasks to discover sequences that yield positive feedback. Without exploration, the agent may never encounter the exit and will fail to learn an optimal policy.

Reward shaping is the most effective strategy to accelerate learning in sparse reward reinforcement learning, as it provides frequent, informative feedback while maintaining policy optimality.

Question 112:

You are training a multi-class text classification model with thousands of categories. The softmax layer is computationally expensive. Which approach is most effective to reduce computation?

A) Use hierarchical softmax or sampled softmax.
B) Remove rare classes to reduce output size.
C) Train with very small batch sizes.
D) Apply L1 regularization to sparsify the model.

Answer: A) Use hierarchical softmax or sampled softmax.

Explanation:

 In multi-class classification with thousands of categories, computing the softmax is computationally intensive. The standard softmax requires exponentiating and normalizing over all classes, which becomes a major bottleneck in large-scale problems. Efficient computation is critical to maintain feasible training times and resource usage.

A) Hierarchical softmax organizes categories into a tree structure. Probability computation for a class involves traversing from the root to the leaf, reducing the computational complexity from O(n) to O(log n) per example. Sampled softmax approximates the full softmax by sampling a subset of negative classes during training, reducing computation while maintaining unbiased gradient estimates. Both methods are particularly effective in NLP tasks such as large-vocabulary word prediction, document classification, and recommendation systems. Hierarchical and sampled softmax maintain model performance while improving computational efficiency, allowing scalable training for models with very high-dimensional outputs.

B) Removing rare classes reduces the output dimensionality but sacrifices coverage for important, albeit infrequent, categories. In practice, even rare classes can be crucial for accurate predictions.

C) Training with very small batch sizes reduces memory requirements per batch but does not reduce the inherent cost of computing the softmax across all categories. Additionally, smaller batches can increase gradient variance, potentially slowing convergence.

D) L1 regularization sparsifies the model weights but does not decrease the computational cost of the softmax operation. Sparsification alone is insufficient to improve efficiency in large-scale multi-class problems.

Using hierarchical or sampled softmax is the most effective strategy for efficiently training large-scale multi-class models without sacrificing accuracy.

Question 113:

 You are training a convolutional neural network (CNN) for medical image segmentation. Some regions of interest (ROIs) are very small compared to the background. Which approach is most effective to improve segmentation performance on small ROIs?

A) Use a loss function such as Dice loss or focal loss.
B) Increase convolutional kernel size.
C) Downsample images to reduce computational cost.
D) Use standard cross-entropy loss without modification.

Answer: A) Use a loss function such as Dice loss or focal loss.

Explanation:

 Medical image segmentation often involves extreme class imbalance. The background can occupy the majority of pixels, while small ROIs (tumors, lesions, or specific organs) occupy only a tiny fraction of the image. Standard cross-entropy loss treats all pixels equally, causing the model to prioritize background prediction and often ignore the clinically relevant small ROIs.

A) Dice loss emphasizes overlap between predicted masks and ground-truth masks, making it particularly sensitive to small ROIs. Focal loss down-weights easily classified background pixels and focuses learning on hard examples, which often correspond to small ROIs. By using these losses, the model learns to accurately segment both small and large structures, improving clinical utility. These techniques are widely used in tumor segmentation, organ delineation, and lesion detection tasks, where accurate segmentation of small structures is critical.

B) Increasing convolutional kernel size increases the receptive field but does not address class imbalance. Small ROIs still contribute minimally to the loss, leaving segmentation performance poor.

C) Downsampling images reduces computational cost but sacrifices fine details, potentially eliminating small ROIs entirely and making accurate segmentation impossible.

D) Standard cross-entropy loss is biased toward the majority background, resulting in poor sensitivity to small ROIs. Without modification, the model underperforms on clinically significant regions.

Dice and focal loss directly address class imbalance and improve segmentation of small ROIs, ensuring the network is clinically effective.

Question 114:

You are building a recommendation system for a streaming platform. Many new shows are added daily, and most users have sparse interaction histories. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.
B) Remove new shows from the recommendation pool.
C) Recommend only the most popular shows.
D) Rely solely on collaborative filtering.

Answer: A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.

Explanation:

In streaming platforms, cold-start problems are common. New users have few interactions, and new items have no historical interactions. Collaborative filtering relies on user-item interaction data and cannot provide meaningful recommendations for new users or new shows. Content-based filtering leverages show metadata (genre, description, cast, keywords) to generate recommendations even in the absence of interaction history.

A) Hybrid recommendation systems combine collaborative and content-based approaches. Content-based filtering addresses cold-start scenarios by recommending shows similar to those a user has engaged with or indicated interest in. Collaborative filtering personalizes recommendations as more interaction data accumulates. For example, a newly released sci-fi series can be recommended to a user who likes science fiction based on metadata. Hybrid systems improve coverage, personalization, and engagement, handling both new content and sparse user histories effectively.

B) Removing new shows limits discoverability and reduces user engagement, negatively impacting retention.

C) Recommending only popular shows maximizes short-term engagement but fails to personalize recommendations, reducing user satisfaction for users with niche tastes.

D) Relying solely on collaborative filtering fails in cold-start scenarios, as new users and items lack interaction data, leading to poor coverage and relevance.

A hybrid recommendation system is the most effective solution, balancing cold-start handling with personalized recommendations over time.

Question 115:

You are training a multi-label text classification model. Some labels are rare, resulting in low recall. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.
B) Remove rare labels from the dataset.
C) Treat the task as multi-class classification using categorical cross-entropy.
D) Train only on examples with frequent labels.

Answer: A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.

Explanation:

 In multi-label classification, instances can belong to multiple categories. Rare labels are underrepresented, causing standard loss functions to underweight them and resulting in low recall. Ensuring accurate predictions for rare labels is crucial in applications such as medical coding, document tagging, and multi-topic classification.

A) Binary cross-entropy treats each label independently, which is suitable for multi-label tasks. Applying class weights inversely proportional to label frequency ensures rare labels contribute more to the loss, prompting the model to learn meaningful representations for these underrepresented categories. Weighted binary cross-entropy improves recall for rare labels while maintaining accuracy on frequent labels. This approach is widely used in imbalanced multi-label scenarios to ensure balanced learning and high coverage.

B) Removing rare labels simplifies the dataset but eliminates critical categories, reducing predictive coverage and practical utility.

C) Treating the problem as multi-class classification assumes each instance has a single label, violating the multi-label structure and ignoring multiple rare labels, reducing predictive performance.

D) Training only on frequent labels excludes rare categories entirely, guaranteeing poor recall and limiting coverage.

Weighted binary cross-entropy is the most effective approach for rare-label multi-label classification, ensuring balanced learning and improved recall across all categories.

Question 116:

You are developing a reinforcement learning agent to control a robotic arm in a manufacturing environment. The agent receives sparse rewards only when a task is completed successfully. Which approach is most effective to accelerate learning?

A) Implement reward shaping to provide intermediate feedback.
B) Reduce the discount factor to prioritize immediate rewards.
C) Increase the replay buffer size.
D) Eliminate random exploration to focus on the current best policy.

Answer: A) Implement reward shaping to provide intermediate feedback.

Explanation:

 Sparse reward scenarios in reinforcement learning are extremely challenging because the agent receives feedback only after completing a sequence of potentially hundreds of actions. For a robotic arm performing assembly tasks, a positive reward is given only when the assembly is correct. Without intermediate guidance, the agent struggles to discern which actions contributed to success, slowing convergence significantly.

A) Reward shaping provides intermediate rewards that give the agent meaningful feedback along the path to the goal. For example, the agent can receive small rewards for correctly grasping a component, moving it toward the assembly point, or avoiding collisions. These intermediate rewards create denser feedback signals, enabling the agent to associate actions with outcomes and learn faster. Potential-based reward shaping ensures that while intermediate rewards accelerate learning, they do not alter the optimal policy, preserving task correctness. This approach is widely adopted in robotics and simulated environments to tackle sparse-reward challenges efficiently. Reward shaping encourages exploration, facilitates credit assignment, and guides the agent toward optimal policies.

B) Reducing the discount factor emphasizes immediate rewards. In sparse reward tasks, distant rewards are essential for learning the correct sequence of actions. A smaller discount factor diminishes the impact of completing the task, causing the agent to learn suboptimal behaviors.

C) Increasing the replay buffer allows for reuse of past experiences, improving sample efficiency. However, in sparse reward environments, most stored transitions do not contain rewards. Replaying these transitions does not provide informative gradients, leaving the sparsity problem unaddressed.

D) Eliminating random exploration reduces the likelihood of discovering successful sequences. Exploration is crucial for encountering positive rewards in sparse-reward environments. Without exploration, the agent may never reach successful states, preventing policy improvement.

Reward shaping is the most effective approach for sparse-reward RL tasks, as it provides frequent feedback while preserving optimal policy learning, enabling the robotic arm to learn efficiently.

Question 117:

You are training a multi-class text classification model with 50,000 categories. Computing the softmax is computationally expensive. Which approach is most effective to reduce computation?

A) Use hierarchical softmax or sampled softmax.
B) Remove rare classes to reduce output size.
C) Train with very small batch sizes.
D) Apply L1 regularization to sparsify the model.

Answer: A) Use hierarchical softmax or sampled softmax.

Explanation:

Large-scale multi-class classification with tens of thousands of categories poses significant computational challenges. Computing the full softmax involves exponentiating and normalizing across all classes, which becomes a major bottleneck. Efficient computation is necessary to maintain feasible training times and resource usage.

A) Hierarchical softmax organizes classes into a tree structure. To compute the probability of a class, the model traverses from the root to the leaf, reducing computational complexity from O(n) to O(log n) per example, where n is the number of classes. Sampled softmax approximates the full softmax by randomly sampling a subset of negative classes during training, allowing gradient updates without computing over all classes. Both approaches maintain predictive performance while improving computational efficiency. These methods are widely used in NLP tasks like language modeling and large-scale document classification, where the output space is extremely large.

B) Removing rare classes reduces output dimensionality but sacrifices coverage for important categories. Even infrequent classes can carry critical information for the task, making this approach impractical.

C) Training with small batch sizes reduces memory requirements per batch but does not reduce the inherent computational cost of computing softmax across all categories. Smaller batches may also increase gradient variance, slowing convergence.

D) L1 regularization sparsifies weights but does not decrease the cost of computing the softmax. Sparsification alone does not address the computational bottleneck for large output spaces.

Hierarchical or sampled softmax is the most effective approach for reducing computation while maintaining accuracy in large-scale multi-class problems.

Question 118:

You are training a convolutional neural network (CNN) for medical image segmentation. Small regions of interest (ROIs) are present but occupy very few pixels relative to the background. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use a loss function such as Dice loss or focal loss.
B) Increase convolutional kernel size.
C) Downsample images to reduce computational cost.
D) Use standard cross-entropy loss without modification.

Answer: A) Use a loss function such as Dice loss or focal loss.

Explanation:

Medical image segmentation often suffers from extreme class imbalance. Small ROIs, such as tumors or lesions, occupy very few pixels, while the background dominates the image. Standard cross-entropy loss treats all pixels equally, causing the model to prioritize background classification and neglect small ROIs. This results in poor segmentation performance for clinically relevant structures.

A) Dice loss emphasizes the overlap between predicted masks and ground-truth masks, giving more importance to small ROIs. Focal loss down-weights easy background pixels and focuses learning on hard examples, often corresponding to small ROIs. Using these loss functions enables the model to accurately segment small, clinically significant regions while maintaining overall mask quality. Dice and focal loss are widely used in medical imaging tasks such as tumor segmentation, organ delineation, and lesion detection, where accurate segmentation of small structures is critical.

B) Increasing convolutional kernel size increases the receptive field but does not address class imbalance. Small ROIs still contribute minimally to the loss, leaving segmentation performance poor.

C) Downsampling images reduces computational cost but sacrifices fine details. Small ROIs may be lost entirely, making accurate segmentation impossible.

D) Standard cross-entropy is biased toward background pixels, resulting in poor sensitivity for small ROIs. Without modification, the model underperforms on clinically significant regions.

Dice and focal loss directly address class imbalance and improve segmentation performance, ensuring that the network is clinically effective for small ROIs.

Question 119:

You are building a recommendation system for a streaming platform. Many new shows are added daily, and most users have sparse interaction histories. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.
B) Remove new shows from the recommendation pool.
C) Recommend only the most popular shows.
D) Rely solely on collaborative filtering.

Answer: A) Use a hybrid recommendation system combining collaborative filtering and content-based filtering.

Explanation:

 Streaming platforms face cold-start problems where new users and new content lack sufficient interaction history. Collaborative filtering relies on user-item interactions, which are sparse in these cases, while content-based filtering leverages metadata (e.g., genre, description, cast) to recommend new items effectively.

A) Hybrid recommendation systems combine collaborative filtering and content-based filtering. Content-based filtering handles cold-start scenarios by recommending shows similar to those a user has engaged with or indicated interest in, even without interaction history. Collaborative filtering refines recommendations over time as more data accumulates. For example, a newly released sci-fi series can be recommended to a user who likes science fiction based on metadata. Hybrid systems improve coverage, personalization, and diversity, ensuring effective recommendations despite sparse user histories or new content.

B) Removing new shows limits discoverability and reduces user engagement.

C) Recommending only popular shows maximizes short-term engagement but lacks personalization, reducing user satisfaction for users with niche tastes.

D) Relying solely on collaborative filtering fails in cold-start scenarios, as new users and items lack interaction data, leading to poor coverage and relevance.

A hybrid recommendation system effectively balances cold-start handling and personalization, providing relevant recommendations for new content and sparse user histories.

Question 120:

You are training a multi-label text classification model. Some labels are rare, resulting in low recall. Which approach is most effective?

A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.
B) Remove rare labels from the dataset.
C) Treat the task as multi-class classification using categorical cross-entropy.
D) Train only on examples with frequent labels.

Answer: A) Use binary cross-entropy with class weighting.

Explanation:

 In multi-label classification, each instance can belong to multiple categories. Rare labels are underrepresented, and standard loss functions often underweight them, resulting in poor recall. Ensuring accurate predictions for rare labels is crucial in applications like medical coding, document tagging, and multi-topic classification.

A) Binary cross-entropy treats each label independently, making it suitable for multi-label tasks. Applying class weights inversely proportional to label frequency ensures rare labels contribute more to the loss, prompting the model to learn meaningful representations for these underrepresented categories. Weighted binary cross-entropy improves recall for rare labels while maintaining performance on frequent labels. This approach is widely adopted in imbalanced multi-label scenarios to ensure balanced learning and high coverage.

B) Removing rare labels simplifies training but eliminates critical categories, reducing predictive coverage and utility.

C) Treating the task as multi-class classification assumes each instance has only one label, violating the multi-label structure and ignoring multiple rare labels in a single instance, reducing predictive performance.

D) Training only on frequent labels excludes rare categories entirely, guaranteeing low recall and limiting overall coverage.

Weighted binary cross-entropy ensures balanced learning across all labels, making it the most effective approach for improving performance on rare labels in multi-label tasks.