Microsoft SC-300  Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 3 Q41-60

Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-300 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 41:

Your organization wants to automatically require MFA when a user signs in from a new device that has never been used before. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy targeting sign-ins from unfamiliar devices
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy targeting sign-ins from unfamiliar devices

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies enable adaptive security based on contextual factors, such as the device used for sign-in. Sign-ins from unfamiliar or new devices can pose a higher risk, making it essential to enforce MFA in these scenarios.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups for the policy.

Define conditions based on sign-in from a device not previously registered.

Enforce MFA before granting access to cloud applications.

Audit sign-ins to monitor potential unauthorized attempts.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for administrators and risky sign-ins but cannot differentiate based on new or unfamiliar devices.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, allows on-premises credential validation but does not enforce MFA or analyze device context.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest user access but does not enforce MFA based on device familiarity for internal users.

Benefits of enforcing MFA for new devices include:

Reduces risk of account compromise from stolen credentials.

Provides adaptive security without impacting users on familiar devices.

Supports compliance reporting by logging device-based MFA prompts.

For example, a user accessing Microsoft 365 from a laptop for the first time will be prompted for MFA. Future access from the same device may not require additional verification, reducing friction while maintaining security.

In conclusion, implementing a Conditional Access policy that targets sign-ins from unfamiliar devices is a highly effective method for enforcing adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) and strengthening overall account security. This approach leverages contextual information about the device being used for access, allowing organizations to apply additional security measures only when risk factors are detected, rather than universally imposing MFA for all sign-ins. By doing so, it balances strong security with a seamless user experience, ensuring that users are not unnecessarily burdened during routine access from recognized devices while still protecting against potentially compromised credentials.

The key advantage of targeting unfamiliar devices is its risk-based, adaptive nature. When a user attempts to sign in from a device that has not been previously registered or deemed trusted, the Conditional Access policy triggers MFA, requiring an additional verification step such as a mobile authenticator, SMS code, or hardware token. This additional layer of authentication significantly reduces the likelihood of unauthorized access, as attackers attempting to log in from unrecognized devices would need both valid credentials and possession of the secondary factor. At the same time, recognized devices that have previously passed security checks can bypass MFA, reducing friction for legitimate users and promoting adoption of secure practices.

This strategy also aligns with zero-trust security principles, which assume that no device or user should be automatically trusted. By continuously evaluating device trustworthiness, organizations can detect anomalies and enforce protective measures proactively. Conditional Access policies can incorporate device compliance signals, such as operating system version, endpoint protection status, and enrollment in device management platforms, to further refine risk detection. As a result, the policy dynamically adapts to changing conditions, applying stronger security controls when needed and relaxing them in low-risk scenarios.

Moreover, targeting unfamiliar devices for adaptive MFA enhances monitoring and auditing capabilities. Security teams gain visibility into potentially risky sign-ins, enabling them to identify patterns indicative of account compromise or malicious activity. This proactive approach supports compliance with industry standards and regulatory requirements, demonstrating that the organization is implementing layered, context-aware security measures to protect sensitive information.

Compared to blanket MFA enforcement, which can frustrate users and lead to bypass behaviors, an adaptive policy focusing on unfamiliar devices provides a balance between security and usability. It mitigates account takeover risks without imposing unnecessary steps for routine access, making it both effective and user-friendly.

Overall, a Conditional Access policy that triggers MFA for sign-ins from unfamiliar devices provides a targeted, adaptive, and intelligent security measure. It enhances protection against unauthorized access, aligns with zero-trust principles, improves visibility into high-risk activity, and ensures a frictionless experience for trusted users, making it the recommended approach for modern, risk-aware authentication.

Question 42:

Your company wants to ensure that privileged roles are only active when needed and require justification for activation. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Explanation 

Privileged Identity Management (PIM) enables just-in-time access for administrative roles in Azure AD. It allows roles to be activated only when required, with optional justification, approval workflows, and time-bound assignments.

Option A) is correct because PIM provides:

Time-limited role activation – Reduces standing privileges.

Justification requirement – Users must provide a reason for activation.

Approval workflows – Optional approval from managers or security teams.

Audit logs – Tracks all activations for compliance and security monitoring.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but cannot manage role activation, justification, or temporary privileges.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not manage privileged roles.

Option D), Conditional Access, controls access based on conditions but cannot manage temporary role activation or require justification.

Benefits of PIM include:

Reduces risk of misuse of administrative privileges.

Supports least privilege principles.

Provides audit trails and compliance support.

For example, consider a scenario where a user needs temporary Global Administrator access to troubleshoot an issue in Exchange Online. Instead of granting permanent access, Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM) requires the user to request the role through a controlled workflow. PIM prompts the user to provide a justification for the elevated privileges, ensuring that every activation is logged and accountable. Depending on organizational policy, the request may require approval from a manager or designated approver, adding an additional layer of oversight. Once approved, the user gains temporary access—typically for a predefined duration, such as two hours—which is sufficient to complete the necessary administrative tasks. After the time window expires, PIM automatically revokes the role, eliminating the risk associated with standing privileged accounts. All activities during the activation period are auditable, supporting compliance, governance, and security monitoring.

In conclusion, Azure AD PIM is the recommended solution for managing privileged roles because it combines security, accountability, and operational efficiency. By enforcing temporary activation, justification, and approval workflows, PIM reduces the risk of misuse or compromise of high-impact roles like Global Administrator. It ensures that elevated access is granted only when needed, for a limited period, and with full visibility into who requested the access, why, and what actions were performed. PIM also integrates with conditional access policies and MFA requirements, further strengthening security for sensitive roles. Organizations adopting PIM benefit from a least-privilege approach, better auditability for regulatory compliance, and automated lifecycle management of administrative privileges. Overall, Azure AD PIM provides a robust, policy-driven framework to safely manage critical identities, enforce accountability, and reduce the attack surface associated with permanent privileged access.

Question 43:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA only for external guest users accessing SharePoint Online. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA

Explanation 

Guest users accessing corporate resources can pose additional risk, making MFA essential to protect sensitive data. Conditional Access allows organizations to require MFA specifically for guest users.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target guest users in Azure AD B2B collaboration.

Apply policies to specific applications, such as SharePoint Online.

Require MFA before granting access.

Monitor and audit all access attempts for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot selectively target guest users.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce guest MFA.

Option D), PIM, manages privileged roles but does not apply to guest access.

Benefits include:

Enhances security for external collaboration.

Ensures that sensitive SharePoint content is protected.

Provides detailed logging for compliance.

For example, when an external consultant attempts to access a SharePoint library, a Conditional Access policy ensures that Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is enforced before any access is granted. The consultant is prompted to complete an additional verification step, such as entering a one-time code, approving a push notification, or using a hardware token. This extra layer of authentication guarantees that even if credentials are compromised, unauthorized users cannot gain entry. If the consultant fails to complete MFA or attempts to bypass it, access is automatically blocked, protecting sensitive organizational data from potential breaches. This ensures that only verified and authenticated external users can collaborate with internal teams while maintaining strict security standards.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy targeting guest users and requiring MFA is the most effective solution for secure external collaboration. By enforcing MFA specifically for external users, organizations can mitigate the risks associated with third-party access without burdening internal employees with unnecessary verification steps. This approach aligns with zero-trust principles by verifying every access attempt based on user context and device compliance, ensuring that only trusted individuals on secure devices can interact with organizational resources. Additionally, these policies provide visibility and auditing capabilities, allowing administrators to monitor guest access, track MFA compliance, and respond to anomalous activity promptly. Overall, Conditional Access with guest-targeted MFA strikes the ideal balance between enabling collaboration and protecting sensitive data, making it a best-practice solution for managing secure external access in modern cloud environments.

Question 44:

Your company wants to prevent sign-ins from legacy authentication protocols to reduce risk. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication

Explanation 

Legacy authentication protocols, such as IMAP, POP3, and SMTP, do not support modern security controls like MFA, increasing the risk of compromise. Blocking these protocols improves security posture.

Option A) is correct because Conditional Access can:

Target users or groups.

Block access for legacy authentication protocols while allowing modern authentication.

Ensure that MFA and device compliance policies apply only to modern protocols.

Provide audit logs for tracking blocked attempts.

Option B), Security Defaults, blocks legacy authentication for admins but does not provide granular control for all users or apps.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot block legacy authentication.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce legacy protocol restrictions.

Benefits include:

Reduces risk of compromised credentials.

Encourages adoption of secure modern authentication methods.

Supports compliance and reporting.

For example, when a user attempts to connect to email via POP3 from a non-compliant device, a Conditional Access policy can block the connection immediately, preventing potential security risks associated with legacy authentication protocols. At the same time, Outlook clients that use modern authentication methods, such as OAuth 2.0 with MFA, are allowed to proceed, ensuring that legitimate users can access their mail without disruption. This selective enforcement ensures that older, insecure protocols that lack modern security features—such as MFA enforcement, token-based authentication, and conditional access checks—cannot be exploited by attackers to gain unauthorized access. By distinguishing between compliant, secure clients and legacy methods, organizations reduce the likelihood of credential compromise and limit their attack surface.

In conclusion, implementing a Conditional Access policy that blocks legacy authentication is the recommended approach for improving security posture. Legacy protocols like POP3, IMAP, and SMTP Basic Authentication do not support advanced security features, making them a prime target for phishing, password spraying, and brute-force attacks. By blocking these protocols, organizations enforce the use of modern authentication methods that provide stronger identity verification, adaptive access controls, and integration with multi-factor authentication. This approach not only mitigates risk from insecure protocols but also aligns with zero-trust principles by ensuring that all access requests are validated and come from compliant devices or applications. Furthermore, these policies enhance visibility and auditing, allowing IT teams to monitor attempted legacy connections and ensure that users are adopting secure access practices. Overall, a Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication effectively reduces organizational exposure to credential compromise and reinforces modern security best practices for cloud and hybrid environments.

Question 45:

Your organization wants to require MFA for all users when accessing cloud applications from unmanaged devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies enable adaptive security based on device management state. Requiring MFA for unmanaged devices protects corporate resources without impacting users on trusted, managed devices.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply conditions – Devices that are not enrolled in Intune or not marked compliant.

Require MFA before access to applications.

Monitor access and log MFA prompts for auditing.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for risky sign-ins but cannot differentiate between managed and unmanaged devices.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce device-based MFA policies.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce device-based MFA for internal users.

Benefits include:

Secures access from untrusted devices.

Reduces the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive apps.

Supports auditing and compliance reporting.

For example, when a user attempts to access SharePoint Online from a personal, unmanaged laptop, a Conditional Access policy triggers a Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) prompt. The user must complete an additional verification step, such as approving a push notification or entering a one-time code, before gaining access. This ensures that even if credentials are compromised, unauthorized users cannot access organizational resources from untrusted devices. Conversely, if the same user accesses SharePoint Online from a corporate-managed and compliant device, the policy allows seamless sign-in without additional prompts, reducing friction for trusted users while maintaining strong security controls.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy that enforces MFA for unmanaged devices provides adaptive and context-aware security for cloud resources. By differentiating between trusted, compliant devices and unmanaged endpoints, organizations can apply stronger authentication requirements where risk is higher, without negatively impacting productivity for users on secure devices. This approach aligns with zero-trust principles, ensuring that every access attempt is evaluated based on device compliance, location, and user context. It also enhances visibility and auditing capabilities, allowing IT teams to monitor risky sign-ins and enforce security policies consistently. Overall, requiring MFA for unmanaged devices balances security and usability, protects sensitive data from unauthorized access, and supports modern, risk-aware access management practices in cloud environments.

Question 46:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA only for users accessing Microsoft Teams from non-corporate devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for non-compliant devices
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for non-compliant devices

Explanation 

Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce adaptive MFA policies based on device compliance. Devices enrolled in Intune and marked compliant can bypass MFA, while non-compliant or unmanaged devices trigger MFA prompts.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply conditions to device state – compliant vs. non-compliant.

Require MFA for non-compliant devices accessing Teams.

Audit and log access attempts to ensure compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally for risky sign-ins but cannot distinguish between compliant and non-compliant devices.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA based on device compliance.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages external guest access but does not enforce MFA for internal devices selectively.

Benefits:

Protects corporate Teams data from untrusted devices.

Improves user experience for compliant devices.

Supports auditing for security and compliance purposes.

For example, when a user attempts to sign into Microsoft Teams from a personal, non-compliant laptop, a Conditional Access policy enforces Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). The user must complete an additional verification step, such as approving a push notification or entering a one-time code, before gaining access. This ensures that even if credentials are compromised, unauthorized users cannot access corporate resources from untrusted devices. Conversely, if the user signs in from a corporate-managed and compliant laptop, the policy recognizes the device’s trusted status, allowing seamless access without additional prompts. This approach reduces friction for secure devices while maintaining robust protection for higher-risk access attempts.

In conclusion, implementing a Conditional Access policy that requires MFA for non-compliant devices provides adaptive security tailored to the risk profile of each sign-in. By distinguishing between managed, compliant devices and unmanaged endpoints, organizations can enforce stronger authentication only when needed, minimizing user disruption while safeguarding sensitive resources. This strategy aligns with zero-trust principles, ensuring that access decisions are based on context, including device compliance, location, and risk signals. Additionally, such policies improve visibility and auditing, allowing IT teams to monitor and respond to potentially risky access attempts effectively. Overall, requiring MFA for non-compliant devices strikes an optimal balance between security and usability, enabling secure collaboration while protecting corporate data from unauthorized access.

Question 47:

Your company wants to enforce MFA for all administrative accounts whenever they sign in, regardless of device or location. Which solution should you implement?

A) Security Defaults
B) Conditional Access targeting all users
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Security Defaults

Explanation 

Security Defaults is a pre-configured set of policies in Azure AD designed to enforce baseline security protections, including mandatory MFA for all administrative accounts and blocking legacy authentication.

Option A) is correct because Security Defaults automatically:

Enforces MFA for all privileged roles.

Protects against password spray and brute-force attacks.

Provides baseline protection without requiring detailed policy configuration.

Supports all users without creating Conditional Access policies manually.

Option B), Conditional Access, could enforce MFA but requires explicit configuration. Security Defaults provides a ready-to-use, low-effort baseline.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce MFA for administrative accounts.

Benefits of Security Defaults:

Simplifies security setup for organizations without dedicated security teams.

Protects against common attacks targeting administrators.

Reduces configuration errors by providing pre-configured policies.

For example, a Global Administrator signing in from any location or device will always be prompted for MFA, enhancing account security.

In conclusion, Security Defaults is the recommended approach to enforce mandatory MFA for all administrative accounts across the organization.

Question 48:

Your organization wants to monitor guest user activity and periodically review their access. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Access Reviews
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Access Reviews

Explanation 

Azure AD Access Reviews allow organizations to periodically assess user access, including external guest accounts. This ensures that guest users do not retain unnecessary access to resources over time, reducing security risks and supporting compliance.

Option A) is correct because Access Reviews enable:

Scheduling reviews for guest accounts on a regular basis.

Assigning reviewers, such as managers or resource owners, to approve or revoke access.

Automating actions, like removing inactive or unnecessary guest accounts.

Providing audit logs to document review outcomes for compliance purposes.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces baseline MFA but does not provide access review capabilities.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot monitor or review access.

Option D), Conditional Access, controls access conditions but does not automate periodic guest access reviews.

Benefits:

Reduces the risk of orphaned or excessive access for guest users.

Supports regulatory compliance requirements for periodic access reviews.

Minimizes administrative overhead through automation.

For example, a consultant who no longer requires access to SharePoint will be automatically flagged in the Access Review. Their access can then be revoked after the review, improving security.

In conclusion, Azure AD Access Reviews is the recommended solution to monitor and manage guest user access over time.

Question 49:

Your organization wants to ensure that only users with multi-factor authentication can access Exchange Online. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for Exchange Online
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for Exchange Online

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies allow organizations to enforce MFA on a per-application basis, providing targeted security without affecting all applications.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target users or groups requiring protection.

Apply the policy specifically to Exchange Online.

Require MFA as an access control before granting sign-in.

Audit access attempts to ensure compliance and detect unusual activity.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot selectively target Exchange Online.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA per application.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce MFA for internal users on Exchange Online.

Benefits:

Protects sensitive email data from unauthorized access.

Provides fine-grained control over MFA enforcement.

Supports auditing and compliance monitoring.

For example, a user signing into Exchange Online must complete an MFA prompt, even if they previously signed into other applications without MFA.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for Exchange Online is the recommended approach to secure email access while maintaining flexibility for other applications.

Question 50:

Your company wants to block sign-ins from legacy authentication protocols like POP3 and IMAP to reduce security risks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication

Explanation 

Legacy authentication protocols do not support modern security controls like MFA, increasing the risk of account compromise. Blocking these protocols enhances security and encourages modern authentication adoption.

Option A) is correct because Conditional Access allows:

Targeting all users or specific groups.

Blocking legacy authentication protocols while allowing modern authentication.

Ensuring MFA and compliance policies apply only to modern protocols.

Logging blocked attempts for auditing.

Option B), Security Defaults, blocks legacy authentication only for admin accounts and does not provide granular control for all users.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce blocking legacy protocols.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce legacy protocol restrictions.

Benefits:

Reduces the risk of credential theft via insecure protocols.

Promotes adoption of secure modern authentication.

Provides audit logs for security and compliance.

For example, a user attempting to connect via POP3 from a non-compliant device will be blocked, while Outlook clients using modern authentication can sign in.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication is the recommended method to secure access and reduce exposure from insecure protocols.

Question 51:

Your organization wants to enforce that only devices compliant with Intune policies can access SharePoint Online and OneDrive. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies allow organizations to enforce device-based access controls. By requiring compliance with Intune policies, organizations can ensure that only trusted and managed devices access sensitive cloud resources.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply policies to SharePoint Online and OneDrive.

Require devices to be compliant with Intune policies (encryption, antivirus, OS updates).

Monitor and log access attempts to ensure security compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA and blocks risky sign-ins but cannot enforce device compliance.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce device compliance or access controls.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages external users but does not enforce device compliance for internal users.

Benefits of enforcing device compliance:

Reduces the risk of data exposure from untrusted devices.

Ensures corporate policies are enforced consistently.

Supports auditing and compliance requirements.

For example, a user trying to access OneDrive from a personal laptop will be blocked until the device is enrolled in Intune and compliant with organizational policies.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance is the recommended approach to secure access to SharePoint Online and OneDrive.

Question 52:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA only for users who access Microsoft 365 apps from high-risk countries. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location

Explanation 

Conditional Access enables organizations to apply context-aware policies, including MFA enforcement based on the geographic location of sign-ins. This ensures additional security for high-risk regions while reducing friction for trusted locations.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Define location conditions, including countries or IP ranges.

Require MFA for users signing in from high-risk locations.

Audit sign-ins for monitoring and compliance purposes.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for administrators and risky sign-ins but cannot enforce location-specific MFA.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot apply adaptive MFA based on location.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce MFA based on geographic location for internal users.

Benefits of location-based MFA:

Protects against unauthorized access from unfamiliar locations.

Reduces user friction by not requiring MFA in trusted regions.

Supports auditing and compliance reporting.

For example, a user signing in from a country where the organization has no operations will be prompted for MFA, while sign-ins from corporate offices proceed without additional verification.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location provides adaptive security while balancing usability.

Question 53:

Your organization wants to require approval before granting temporary access to privileged roles in Azure AD. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Explanation 

Privileged Identity Management (PIM) enables organizations to manage just-in-time access for privileged roles, reducing risk from standing administrative permissions. PIM supports approval workflows, time-bound access, and auditing.

Option A) is correct because PIM allows administrators to:

Require approval before users activate privileged roles.

Define time-bound role assignments for temporary access.

Require MFA and justification before role activation.

Maintain audit logs of all activations for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but does not manage temporary privileged role activation or approvals.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not manage privileged roles.

Option D), Conditional Access, controls access conditions but cannot enforce role activation approvals.

Benefits of PIM:

Reduces exposure from standing administrative accounts.

Supports least privilege access principles.

Provides audit logs and compliance tracking.

For example, a user requests temporary Global Administrator access. PIM requires manager approval and justification. Access is granted for two hours and automatically revoked afterward, minimizing security risk.

In conclusion, Azure AD PIM is the recommended solution for managing temporary privileged roles with approval workflows.

Question 54:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA for all guest users accessing Microsoft Teams. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA

Explanation 

Guest users (external collaborators) accessing Microsoft Teams can introduce security risks. Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce MFA specifically for guest users, enhancing security without affecting internal users.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target guest users in Azure AD B2B collaboration.

Apply the policy specifically to Microsoft Teams.

Require MFA before granting access.

Audit guest sign-ins for compliance monitoring.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot selectively target guest users.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA for guests.

Option D), PIM, manages privileged roles but does not apply to guest access.

Benefits include:

Protects Teams data from unauthorized external access.

Supports compliance and auditing requirements.

Allows secure external collaboration while maintaining usability for internal users.

For example, an external consultant must complete MFA to access a Teams channel. If MFA is not completed, access is blocked.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA is the recommended solution for securing Teams collaboration with external users.

Question 55:

Your company wants to require MFA for users accessing Microsoft 365 apps from unmanaged devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies provide adaptive security based on device management state. Requiring MFA for unmanaged devices ensures that corporate resources remain protected while reducing friction for trusted, managed devices.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Define conditions based on device management state (enrolled vs. unenrolled).

Require MFA for access from unmanaged devices.

Log all MFA prompts for auditing and compliance purposes.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for risky sign-ins but cannot distinguish between managed and unmanaged devices.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce device-based MFA.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce device-based MFA for internal users.

Benefits include:

Reduces risk of unauthorized access from personal or unmanaged devices.

Supports compliance requirements and auditing.

Provides adaptive security without hindering productivity for managed devices.

For example, a user attempting to access SharePoint Online from a personal laptop is prompted for MFA, whereas a corporate-managed device can access without extra verification.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices ensures secure access to Microsoft 365 resources while maintaining usability.

Question 56:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA only for users accessing Microsoft 365 applications from outside the corporate network. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location

Explanation 

Conditional Access allows organizations to implement adaptive policies based on the sign-in location. By requiring MFA only for users outside trusted corporate networks, organizations can balance security with usability.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply location-based conditions – corporate IP ranges vs. external IPs.

Require MFA for external access while allowing seamless sign-in from trusted networks.

Monitor and log all access attempts for auditing and compliance purposes.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot differentiate between internal and external network locations.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce adaptive MFA policies based on location.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce location-based MFA for internal users.

Benefits of location-based MFA:

Enhances security for users accessing resources from untrusted networks.

Reduces unnecessary MFA prompts for trusted corporate network users.

Supports auditing and compliance reporting for access events.

For example, a user accessing Exchange Online from home or a public Wi-Fi network will be prompted for MFA, while access from the corporate office network proceeds without additional verification.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location provides adaptive security while maintaining usability.

Question 57:

Your organization wants to ensure that privileged roles can only be activated temporarily and require justification for activation. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Explanation 

Privileged Identity Management (PIM) enables just-in-time access for privileged roles, reducing exposure from standing administrative privileges. PIM supports temporary activation, justification, and approval workflows.

Option A) is correct because PIM allows administrators to:

Enforce time-limited role assignments for privileged users.

Require justification before role activation.

Optionally require approval workflows from managers or security teams.

Maintain audit logs of all activations for compliance purposes.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but cannot manage privileged roles or require temporary activation.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not manage privileged access.

Option D), Conditional Access, controls access conditions but cannot enforce temporary role activation or justification.

Benefits of PIM:

Reduces risk of misuse of high-privilege accounts.

Implements least privilege principles effectively.

Supports auditing and compliance requirements.

For example, a user requests temporary Global Administrator access to perform maintenance. PIM requires justification and approval before granting the role for a limited duration, automatically revoking access afterward.

In conclusion, Azure AD PIM is the recommended solution for temporary, justified activation of privileged roles.

Question 58:

Your organization wants to block all sign-ins from legacy authentication protocols to reduce security risks. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication

Explanation 

Legacy authentication protocols, such as IMAP, POP3, and SMTP, do not support modern security controls like MFA and conditional access, making them a common vector for attacks. Blocking legacy authentication improves security posture.

Option A) is correct because Conditional Access allows:

Targeting all users or specific groups.

Blocking legacy authentication protocols while permitting modern authentication.

Applying MFA and compliance policies only for modern protocols.

Logging blocked attempts for auditing and compliance purposes.

Option B), Security Defaults, blocks legacy authentication for admin accounts but does not allow granular control for all users or protocols.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot block legacy authentication.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not block legacy protocols.

Benefits include:

Reduces exposure to credential theft via insecure protocols.

Encourages adoption of modern authentication.

Provides audit logs for monitoring and compliance reporting.

For example, a user attempting to connect via POP3 will be blocked, while Outlook using modern authentication can continue to access resources.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication is the recommended method to improve security and reduce exposure from insecure protocols.

Question 59:

Your company wants to require MFA for users accessing cloud applications from unmanaged devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies provide adaptive security based on device state. Enforcing MFA for unmanaged devices protects corporate resources without hindering users on managed devices.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Define conditions for unmanaged devices (not Intune-enrolled or non-compliant).

Require MFA for access to cloud applications.

Log all MFA prompts for auditing and compliance purposes.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for risky sign-ins but cannot distinguish managed vs. unmanaged devices.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce device-based MFA.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce device-based MFA for internal users.

Benefits include:

Protects sensitive resources from untrusted devices.

Supports compliance and auditing requirements.

Reduces friction for users on trusted devices while securing access from unmanaged devices.

For example, a user trying to access SharePoint Online from a personal laptop will be prompted for MFA, while a corporate-managed laptop can access without additional verification.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices ensures adaptive security for cloud applications.

Question 60:

Your organization wants to enforce that only devices compliant with Intune policies can access Exchange Online and SharePoint Online. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies allow organizations to enforce device compliance requirements. By ensuring only compliant devices access sensitive applications, organizations protect data while supporting secure access.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply policies to Exchange Online and SharePoint Online.

Require devices to meet Intune compliance policies (encryption, antivirus, OS updates).

Audit sign-ins to verify compliance and detect risks.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot enforce device compliance.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce device-based access controls.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce device compliance for internal users.

Benefits include:

Reduces exposure of sensitive data to untrusted devices.

Supports organizational compliance and security policies.

Ensures consistent enforcement across cloud applications.

For example, a user attempting to access Exchange Online from a personal laptop will be blocked until the device is enrolled in Intune and compliant with organizational security policies.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance is the recommended solution for securing Exchange Online and SharePoint Online access.