Use VCE Exam Simulator to open VCE files

101 F5 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps
To simplify the management of complex access control policies, what can an administrator create that includes multiple policy actions and can be reused within the policy itself?
A. Visual Policy Editor
B. Policy Editor
C. Visual Editor
D. Policy Creator
Explanation:
When managing access control policies—especially in complex environments where multiple rules, actions, and exceptions must be accounted for—simplifying the configuration is essential for scalability, troubleshooting, and auditing.
This is where the Visual Policy Editor (VPE) comes in. The Visual Policy Editor is a graphical interface used in platforms like F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) that allows administrators to build, organize, and reuse policy actions visually rather than writing scripts or navigating through long manual configurations.
The Visual Policy Editor enables the creation of macro-like containers of policy actions. These groupings can include logic for:
User authentication
Endpoint checks
Role-based access controls
Single sign-on procedures
HTTP header or cookie injection
Once such a group is built (e.g., a reusable authentication flow), it can be inserted into various policies, ensuring consistency and reduced effort in policy maintenance.
Let’s evaluate the options:
A. Visual Policy Editor – Correct
This is the tool used to create visual representations of access policies. It allows reusability, modularization, and easy drag-and-drop configuration.
B. Policy Editor – Incorrect
This is a vague term and doesn’t specifically refer to the feature allowing reuse of actions in a visual format.
C. Visual Editor – Incorrect
Although it sounds similar, “Visual Editor” is not a specific term tied to access policy platforms and lacks the clarity and function of the Visual Policy Editor.
D. Policy Creator – Incorrect
Again, this is a general term and doesn’t represent a specific feature or tool used to manage complex policies.
Thus, the Visual Policy Editor (VPE) is the correct and powerful tool for simplifying complex access policies.
To help manage complex access control configurations, an administrator can create a reusable policy structure containing multiple actions and insert it into access policies by using which tool?
A. Deployment Wizard
B. Setup Wizard
C. Policy Wizard
D. Visual Wizard
Explanation:
In structured access management solutions like F5 APM, you can create policies with nested logic and repeated modules. To efficiently build such configurations, administrators can use a wizard-based interface—in this case, the Policy Wizard.
The Policy Wizard is a tool that walks administrators through the process of creating access policies step-by-step, ensuring all required components are considered. It helps in assembling:
Authentication methods (LDAP, RADIUS, AD, etc.)
User role or group logic
Branching decisions
Assignment of resources
Error or fallback actions
When a previously created policy (or macro) needs to be inserted into a larger or more complex policy, the Policy Wizard simplifies this process. It ensures the administrator selects compatible modules and integrates them correctly without manual errors.
Let’s review the options:
A. Deployment Wizard – Incorrect
This is generally used for broader platform deployment configurations (e.g., initial device setup), not for access policy logic.
B. Setup Wizard – Incorrect
Also relates more to system configuration than access policy creation.
C. Policy Wizard – Correct
This tool specifically helps in creating and managing access policies. It is aware of access modules and supports proper logic insertion.
D. Visual Wizard – Incorrect
While this sounds plausible, it is not a standard or recognized term in access policy systems and does not reflect an actual tool.
The Policy Wizard helps manage and embed complex or nested access policies into the main policy flow. Together with the Visual Policy Editor, it forms a powerful combination for simplifying complex security policies.
What are the key benefits of using the Policy Builder in an Application Security Manager (ASM) configuration?
A. It can be used without requiring deep technical knowledge of web applications.
B. It only needs a basic understanding of ASM to operate effectively.
C. Both A and B, plus it offers minimal administrative overhead.
D. It has almost no administrative impact due to its automatic nature.
Explanation:
The Policy Builder in F5’s Application Security Manager (ASM) is a powerful feature that helps administrators automate the creation and tuning of web application firewall (WAF) policies. It monitors traffic and adjusts policies dynamically based on observed behavior, which significantly reduces the manual effort required to maintain a secure and functional policy.
Here’s how each option contributes to the benefits of using the Policy Builder:
Option A – True:
One of the major advantages is that it does not require deep expertise in web applications. Policy Builder analyzes the structure and behavior of applications by observing live traffic, making decisions about which parameters, URLs, file types, or methods to allow or block. This is especially beneficial in environments where web applications are complex or poorly documented.
Option B – True:
Similarly, the tool is designed to be user-friendly and doesn't require in-depth knowledge of the ASM module itself. While some familiarity helps, even administrators with limited ASM experience can operate Policy Builder effectively.
Option C – Correct:
Since both Option A and B are true and the Policy Builder is largely automated, it introduces low administrative burden, especially compared to manually managing WAF policies. Hence, C is the most comprehensive and accurate answer.
Option D – Partially True, but Incomplete:
While the administrative impact is reduced, it’s not completely “very low” in all cases. Some review or tuning may still be necessary depending on traffic volume, risk tolerance, or application changes.
The Policy Builder enables intelligent automation of security policies, reducing the manual burden on IT teams and making security management scalable and accessible to a wider range of users.
F5 APM administrators can configure access policies that grant users which two types of access options? (Choose two)
A. CIFS file share access
B. Traditional client/server application access
C. Secure access to web applications
D. Proxy-based access
E. Remote Desktop Connection (RDC) access
Explanation:
F5 Access Policy Manager (APM) is a flexible solution that provides secure, authenticated access to applications, networks, and systems. It supports multiple access scenarios based on user roles, devices, location, and more.
Let’s evaluate the options:
A. CIFS access – Incorrect:
CIFS (Common Internet File System) refers to file sharing in Windows networks. While F5 APM can secure traffic generally, CIFS-specific access is not a direct or common access scenario configured through APM access policies.
B. Client/server access – Correct:
Client/server applications (like SAP, Oracle client tools, or other thick clients) often require secure tunneling to function outside of a traditional corporate network. APM can provide network access tunnels or full VPN-style access to allow secure use of such applications.
C. Web application access – Correct:
APM is widely used to provide secure web application access, including single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), and granular access control based on user identity and context. It integrates well with web portals and backend apps.
D. Proxy access – Incorrect:
While proxy-based access might be supported through other components, APM doesn’t directly grant "proxy access" in the traditional sense used in security architecture. Instead, it leverages tunneling or policy-based routing.
E. RDC access – Incorrect:
Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP or RDC) access is more commonly managed through other specialized components or protocols like Microsoft RD Gateway, not directly via APM’s native access policy logic.
F5 APM provides robust support for web applications and client/server applications, making B and C the correct answers. These access types cover the most common use cases in enterprise environments that rely on APM for secure remote access and authentication.
Which of the following is a primary advantage of using iRules in an F5 BIG-IP environment?
A. They establish secure connections between clients and the Local Traffic Manager (LTM).
B. They offer highly granular control over network and application traffic behavior.
C. They serve as reusable templates for rapidly deploying new applications.
D. They leverage Active Directory for user authentication and access control.
E. They automate the creation of LTM objects like virtual servers and pools.
Explanation:
iRules are a feature of F5 BIG-IP that allow administrators to write event-driven scripts using a language called Tcl (Tool Command Language). These scripts can inspect, modify, redirect, or block traffic based on highly specific criteria. The power of iRules lies in their granularity and flexibility.
Let’s explore each option in more detail:
A. Secure connections – Incorrect:
While iRules can influence TLS behavior, establishing secure connections is primarily handled by SSL profiles on LTM, not by iRules directly.
B. Granular control – Correct:
This is the core benefit of iRules. They allow fine-tuned traffic manipulation based on headers, payload content, IPs, URIs, ports, session data, and much more. You can even apply logic based on HTTP methods or cookies. This allows you to enforce custom security, routing, or performance policies.
C. Templates – Incorrect:
iRules are not used for deploying applications. iApps are the correct F5 feature used to create reusable deployment templates.
D. Active Directory authentication – Incorrect:
Authentication is typically handled by F5 APM, not iRules. While iRules can inspect headers or cookies related to user identity, they don’t interact directly with Active Directory for user auth.
E. Automating object creation – Incorrect:
This is more relevant to iControl REST or TMSH scripting, which are used for automating LTM object creation, not iRules.
iRules provide unmatched control over traffic flow, allowing IT teams to enforce custom logic that goes far beyond what default configurations support. This makes Option B the correct choice.
Question 6:
F5 APM applies access control rules at which two OSI model layers? (Choose two)
A. Session Layer (Layer 5)
B. Transport Layer (Layer 4)
C. Application Layer (Layer 7)
D. Presentation Layer (Layer 6)
E. Data Link Layer (Layer 2)
Explanation:
F5 Access Policy Manager (APM) provides granular access control and user authentication based on various contextual attributes like device type, user identity, geolocation, and time of access. It enforces policies by evaluating traffic at multiple layers of the OSI model, particularly those layers most relevant to security and application delivery.
Here’s the breakdown:
A. Layer 5 (Session Layer) – Incorrect:
APM doesn’t apply direct enforcement at this level. The session layer is responsible for maintaining sessions, but ACLs are not defined here.
B. Layer 4 (Transport Layer) – Correct:
APM can enforce policies based on TCP or UDP port numbers, which are transport-layer characteristics. This is essential when defining ACLs that block or allow traffic based on the protocol type or port range.
C. Layer 7 (Application Layer) – Correct:
APM excels at evaluating and enforcing policies at the application layer. It can inspect HTTP headers, URIs, cookies, and SSO sessions, and apply access rules accordingly. This is particularly useful for controlling access to specific applications or web pages.
D. Layer 6 (Presentation Layer) – Incorrect:
While APM deals with application-layer data, it doesn’t operate on data encoding or encryption formats, which fall under the presentation layer.
E. Layer 2 (Data Link Layer) – Incorrect:
APM does not operate at the data link layer, which governs MAC addresses and physical switching. That’s the domain of network switches or firewalls, not application access solutions.
F5 APM applies access control lists (ACLs) at the Transport layer (Layer 4) and Application layer (Layer 7), where it can both control ports and interpret application-level data. These layers are critical for security enforcement and intelligent traffic handling, making Options B and C the correct answers.
Is it true that TMOS is a software foundation developed by F5 that runs on the BIG-IP hardware and software platforms?
A. True
B. False
Explanation:
TMOS, short for Traffic Management Operating System, is the core operating system that powers all modern F5 BIG-IP platforms. It is not just an OS in the traditional sense; it is an integrated architecture designed specifically for high-performance, flexible, and intelligent traffic management.
Here’s what makes TMOS critical to the F5 ecosystem:
Traffic Processing: TMOS allows all F5 modules (like LTM, GTM, APM, ASM) to share a unified system kernel while offering specialized functions like load balancing, access control, application acceleration, and security.
Customization and Extensibility: Through features like iRules (event-based traffic scripting) and iApps (templating deployments), TMOS enables custom application services tailored to each environment.
Virtual and Physical Platforms: TMOS runs on both BIG-IP hardware appliances and Virtual Editions (VE) deployed in cloud and virtualized environments, making it versatile and platform-independent.
Modular Design: All advanced F5 services (APM, ASM, etc.) are software modules that run on TMOS, ensuring tight integration and shared resource utilization.
Therefore, the statement that TMOS is an F5 software module that runs on the BIG-IP platform is true, making Option A the correct answer.
Question 8:
Which of the following four products are F5 modules built on the TMOS platform? (Choose four)
A. ARX – File Virtualization Solution
B. GTM – Global Traffic Manager
C. WOM – WAN Optimization Manager
D. APM – Access Policy Manager
E. ASM – Application Security Manager
F. FirePass – Legacy SSL VPN Product
Explanation:
To answer this question, we must distinguish between F5 products that are modules running on TMOS, and those that are standalone or legacy products not based on TMOS.
Here’s an overview of each option:
A. ARX – Incorrect:
ARX was F5’s file virtualization solution for managing and optimizing file storage, but it was a separate appliance and not a TMOS-based module. It has since been discontinued and was never part of the BIG-IP modular ecosystem.
B. GTM (now called DNS) – Correct:
GTM, now known as BIG-IP DNS, is a global server load balancing module that operates on TMOS. It helps direct client traffic to the optimal data center and integrates with DNS-based resolution. It's fully TMOS-native.
C. WOM – Correct:
WAN Optimization Manager (WOM) was a module built on TMOS that provided WAN acceleration capabilities. It allowed for deduplication and compression of traffic between data centers to optimize performance.
D. APM – Correct:
Access Policy Manager (APM) is a TMOS-based module that provides centralized access management, SSL VPN capabilities, and granular access control policies. It is widely used in enterprise remote access scenarios.
E. ASM – Correct:
Application Security Manager (ASM) is F5’s Web Application Firewall (WAF) module and runs directly on TMOS. It is used to protect web apps from OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities and integrates closely with other TMOS-based features.
F. FirePass – Incorrect:
FirePass was a standalone legacy SSL VPN appliance offered by F5 before APM was introduced. It is no longer supported and was not built on the TMOS platform.
The four F5 products that are TMOS-based modules are:
GTM (now BIG-IP DNS)
WOM
APM
ASM
These modules can be enabled and licensed as part of the BIG-IP system running on TMOS, allowing integrated traffic management, security, and access policies.
Which of the following is not recognized as a valid profile type within the F5 BIG-IP system?
A. Protocol
B. Application
C. Persistence
D. Authentication
E. SSL
Explanation:
On F5 BIG-IP, profiles are a central concept used to define how different types of network traffic are managed, manipulated, and optimized. A profile in BIG-IP is a pre-configured set of settings that applies to traffic passing through a virtual server. Profiles exist for a variety of functions — from SSL termination to traffic persistence, to authentication policies.
Let’s examine each option in the context of BIG-IP:
A. Protocol – Valid Profile Type
Protocol profiles exist for both TCP and UDP, allowing you to tune how BIG-IP handles the low-level behavior of transport layer protocols, such as buffer sizes, congestion management, and idle timeouts.
B. Application – Not a Valid Profile Type
While BIG-IP handles application traffic, there is no specific “Application” profile type. Application logic is typically configured through Layer 7 profiles like HTTP, SIP, or FTP, but "Application" is not a named profile category on its own.
C. Persistence – Valid Profile Type
Persistence profiles determine how session stickiness is maintained, such as cookie-based persistence, source IP persistence, or SSL session ID persistence.
D. Authentication – Valid Profile Type
Authentication profiles define how users are authenticated before accessing an application, including support for LDAP, RADIUS, and SSL client certs. These are typically used in conjunction with Access Policy Manager (APM) or on web-facing services.
E. SSL – Valid Profile Type
SSL profiles are used for client-side or server-side SSL termination. You’ll see both Client SSL and Server SSL profiles that dictate how encryption and decryption occur.
Out of all the listed options, “Application” is not an official profile type on the BIG-IP platform, making Option B the correct answer.
Question 10:
Does the BIG-IP system automatically detect the lowest available connection speed between the client and the server, and then apply that speed to both directions of communication?
A. True
B. False
Explanation:
This question touches on how BIG-IP manages client-server connections. The BIG-IP operates using a full-proxy architecture, meaning it terminates client connections on one side and initiates separate connections to the server on the other. This decouples the client-to-BIG-IP and BIG-IP-to-server sessions entirely, allowing each connection to be independently managed.
Let’s break this down further:
A full proxy allows BIG-IP to fully inspect and manipulate all traffic before forwarding it to the backend server.
It establishes two separate TCP connections:
One between the client and BIG-IP.
One between BIG-IP and the backend server.
Connection speed (bandwidth and latency) can vary between the client and server.
Because connections are managed independently, the speed, window size, congestion control, and other TCP parameters used for the client side do not influence the server side, and vice versa.
This is a key benefit of using BIG-IP — it can optimize and accelerate each side of the connection based on unique characteristics.
The original statement suggests that BIG-IP detects the lowest connection speed between both parties and applies that to both connections.
This is false — BIG-IP does not throttle or synchronize speeds across the connections. Instead, it can apply independent optimization profiles.
Because of BIG-IP’s full-proxy nature, it does not constrain both connections to the lowest common speed. Instead, it optimizes each link independently, based on applied profiles and the capabilities of each side.
Therefore, the correct answer is B. False.
Top Training Courses
LIMITED OFFER: GET 30% Discount
This is ONE TIME OFFER
A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login. *We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.
Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator
Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.
Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.