Use VCE Exam Simulator to open VCE files

300-425 Cisco Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps
Question No 1:
A network engineer is preparing for an office site survey at an office with a height of 2.5 meters. The engineer needs to plan the deployment of wireless access points (APs) for optimal coverage and performance throughout the office space.
Which three components are recommended to complete the survey effectively? (Choose three.)
A. Use a battery pack to power APs.
B. Use a drawing of the office space to mark AP and client placements.
C. Perform a DoS attack on APs while measuring throughput.
D. Use APs with directional antennas.
E. Use APs with external antennas.
F. Use APs with built-in antennas.
Correct Answer:
B. Use a drawing of the office space to mark AP and client placements.
D. Use APs with directional antennas.
E. Use APs with external antennas.
A site survey is an essential step for ensuring the optimal performance of a wireless network in an office environment. The goal is to determine the best placement of access points (APs) to provide adequate coverage and meet throughput requirements. Here are the key elements needed for a successful site survey:
B. Use a drawing of the office space to mark AP and client placements.
A drawing of the office space is critical for mapping the physical layout of the area. During the survey, the engineer can mark potential AP locations and client placements, ensuring that all areas receive sufficient wireless coverage. A drawing also helps to visualize potential obstacles like walls, metal partitions, or large equipment that may interfere with the signal.
D. Use APs with directional antennas.
Directional antennas are ideal for a site survey because they focus the radio signal in a specific direction, allowing the engineer to measure the coverage in targeted areas more precisely. This can be beneficial when the engineer needs to ensure high signal strength in certain parts of the office, such as meeting rooms or workstations, while avoiding unnecessary coverage in other areas. Directional antennas help reduce interference and improve signal quality.
E. Use APs with external antennas.
External antennas provide more flexibility and performance control during a site survey. These antennas are typically detachable, allowing engineers to adjust or swap them based on the survey needs. With external antennas, the network engineer can test various antenna configurations (e.g., omnidirectional or directional) to determine which setup provides the best coverage for the office layout.
A. Use a battery pack to power APs.
While it may be useful in certain situations, using a battery pack is not a core recommendation for a site survey. The primary focus should be on planning and measuring signal coverage rather than temporary power solutions.
C. Perform a DoS attack on APs while measuring throughput.
A Denial of Service (DoS) attack would disrupt the network, and it is not appropriate to use in a site survey. Site surveys are meant to assess and plan the network, not to deliberately degrade its performance.
F. Use APs with built-in antennas.
APs with built-in antennas are not as flexible as those with external antennas. Built-in antennas may not be able to provide optimal coverage for specific areas, and adjusting their coverage can be challenging. External antennas give the engineer more control and flexibility during the survey.
To perform a comprehensive and effective office site survey, the network engineer should focus on using a drawing of the office layout, directional antennas for targeted signal measurements, and external antennas for flexibility in adjusting signal coverage. These components will provide the engineer with the tools needed to optimize the placement of APs and ensure optimal wireless performance in the office space.
Question No 2:
An engineer is designing a wireless network to support a variety of wireless clients in an office environment. To ensure a seamless and consistent experience for all users, the engineer needs to perform a site survey using the most appropriate client device.
Which client device should the engineer use during the survey to ensure a consistent wireless experience for all clients in the network?
A. The client that has the highest RF properties
B. The client that is used most by the company
C. The client that is used least by the company
D. The client with the worst RF characteristics
Correct Answer:
D. The client with the worst RF characteristics
When designing a wireless network, it’s critical to ensure that all types of devices can connect seamlessly and maintain optimal performance, regardless of their specific technical characteristics. To achieve this, the site survey becomes a key step in validating the network design. During the site survey, engineers must consider how well the network will perform for every client device, including those that might have less favorable characteristics for connecting to the wireless network.
Ensuring Coverage for the Worst-Performing Clients:
During a wireless survey, focusing on the client with the worst RF characteristics is crucial because it represents the device that will likely have the most trouble connecting to the network. This could be due to factors like lower quality wireless adapters, older technology (e.g., 802.11b/g devices), or limited antennas. By using this device during the survey, the engineer can ensure that the network is designed to meet the needs of all users, even those with less optimal equipment. This helps to avoid areas of poor coverage or weak signal strength that may impact the performance of certain devices.
Ensuring Consistent User Experience:
By focusing on the worst-performing client, the engineer can ensure that weaker signals or interference issues do not degrade the user experience. Clients with better RF characteristics (e.g., newer or higher-end devices) will naturally perform better, but the real challenge lies in ensuring a consistent experience for devices that might otherwise struggle to maintain a stable connection.
Future-Proofing the Network:
Newer and more powerful client devices will likely be added over time. Ensuring that the weakest devices have reliable connections guarantees that the network can handle the future diversity of wireless clients, from older laptops to newer smartphones or IoT devices.
A. The Client with the Highest RF Properties:
Using the best-performing device in terms of RF characteristics would give you a false sense of confidence. This device would likely connect well in most locations, but it doesn’t ensure that the network will work well for clients with weaker RF characteristics.
B. The Client Used Most by the Company:
While popular client devices should be considered, they may not represent the challenges posed by older or lower-end devices that still exist in the environment.
C. The Client Used Least by the Company:
Using a less frequently used client may not be representative of the overall client base. The focus should be on ensuring consistent performance for all devices, especially the ones that may have less favorable characteristics.
By using the client with the worst RF characteristics during the site survey, the engineer ensures that the network is designed to deliver consistent performance for all types of wireless clients, including those with lower technical specifications. This approach helps in creating a robust and reliable wireless network that can handle a wide range of devices and user needs, providing optimal coverage and performance across the entire network.
Question No 3:
An engineer is designing a Voice over WLAN (VoWLAN) network for high-speed data and voice services in an indoor office environment. The engineer has performed a predictive site survey and is working to ensure optimal performance for both data and voice traffic. The goal is to establish the best data rate that ensures a reliable signal and performance for VoWLAN.
Given a signal level of -67 dBm, which data rate is recommended for optimal VoWLAN performance?
A. 6 Mbps on 802.11 bgn
B. 24 Mbps on 802.11 bgn
C. 12 Mbps on 802.11 an
D. 24 Mbps on 802.11 an
Correct Answer:
D. 24 Mbps on 802.11 an
In a predictive site survey, the engineer aims to determine the network coverage and ensure that the wireless network will meet the performance requirements for both data and Voice over WLAN (VoWLAN) services. VoWLAN requires a reliable, low-latency connection to ensure call quality, which is heavily influenced by the data rate, signal strength, and the standard being used.
A signal level of -67 dBm is generally considered a good signal for VoWLAN because it falls within the acceptable range for clear communication without excessive packet loss or interference. At this signal strength, the network should be able to support data and voice traffic effectively. However, choosing the appropriate data rate is crucial to optimizing the network's performance.
Higher Throughput for VoWLAN:
For a network supporting VoWLAN, it's essential to prioritize higher data rates to support both voice and data traffic simultaneously without sacrificing quality. 802.11an offers a higher maximum data rate compared to 802.11bgn. A data rate of 24 Mbps is considered a sweet spot for 802.11an in environments with good signal strength, ensuring that both voice calls and high-speed data will perform optimally. This data rate balances performance and signal stability, especially in indoor office environments.
802.11an Standard:
The 802.11an (Wi-Fi 4) standard supports higher throughput than the older 802.11bgn standards, especially in the 5 GHz band. 802.11an can provide up to 600 Mbps theoretically, with a reliable data rate achievable at lower signal strengths like -67 dBm. This makes it suitable for supporting both data and voice over IP (VoIP) calls, ensuring minimal delay and packet loss, which are crucial for maintaining the quality of voice calls.
A. 6 Mbps on 802.11 bgn:
This is a very low data rate for modern environments, and while it might work for voice in some cases, it’s insufficient for high-speed data traffic, especially in a mixed-use network where both data and VoWLAN are required. It would likely lead to congestion and poor performance in the network.
B. 24 Mbps on 802.11 bgn:
802.11bgn (Wi-Fi 3) supports lower data rates compared to 802.11an, particularly on the 2.4 GHz band. While 24 Mbps might be achievable under optimal conditions on 802.11gn, it does not provide the same level of throughput and efficiency as 802.11an in the 5 GHz band. Therefore, it’s not the best choice for high-speed data and voice.
C. 12 Mbps on 802.11 an:
While this data rate is achievable on 802.11an, it’s lower than the 24 Mbps option and would not be ideal for a network designed to handle high-speed data and VoWLAN traffic. A higher data rate ensures better performance and quality, particularly for voice calls that require low latency and stable throughput.
For optimal VoWLAN performance in an indoor office environment with a -67 dBm signal level, the best data rate is 24 Mbps on 802.11an. This combination offers high throughput and ensures both data and voice can be transmitted reliably without sacrificing call quality. By using 802.11an with a sufficient data rate, the network will deliver the necessary performance for high-speed applications and low-latency VoWLAN services.
Question No 4:
A customer is setting up a mesh network and is concerned about the security of the backhaul links used for communication between mesh nodes. These backhaul links are critical as they transmit data across the network, and the customer needs to know what type of encryption is employed to ensure data security over these links.
Which level of encryption is used for securing the backhaul link in a mesh network?
A. Hash
B. AES
C. WEP
D. 3DES
Correct Answer:
B. AES
In a mesh network, nodes (usually wireless access points or routers) communicate with each other to form a network infrastructure that can cover a large area, providing a robust and flexible wireless connection. Backhaul links are the communication paths between these mesh nodes, typically used to transfer data between the nodes and to the internet or other connected devices. Since mesh networks often transmit sensitive or critical data, securing these backhaul links is essential to prevent unauthorized access or data breaches.
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is the most widely used encryption standard for securing wireless communication, including the backhaul links in mesh networks. It offers robust encryption that is resistant to many types of attacks and is considered highly secure. AES operates with key sizes of 128, 192, or 256 bits, providing a strong level of encryption and ensuring that data transmitted over the backhaul links is protected against eavesdropping and unauthorized access.
Industry Standard: AES is the default encryption standard for modern wireless networks, including Wi-Fi and mesh backhaul communication. It is widely used in Wi-Fi Protected Access 2 (WPA2) and Wi-Fi Protected Access 3 (WPA3), which are the security protocols for wireless networks, ensuring that the backhaul links between mesh nodes are encrypted with this advanced standard.
A. Hash:
Hashing is used for ensuring data integrity and verifying authenticity, but it does not provide encryption. Hashing algorithms like SHA (Secure Hash Algorithm) are used to create fixed-size representations (hashes) of data but do not protect the data from being read by unauthorized users.
C. WEP (Wired Equivalent Privacy):
WEP is an outdated encryption protocol that was once used in early wireless networks. However, WEP is considered insecure and has been deprecated for many years due to its weaknesses, including vulnerabilities to attacks like the FMS attack. It is no longer recommended for any modern network, including mesh backhaul links.
D. 3DES (Triple DES):
3DES is a symmetric encryption algorithm that was an improvement over the older DES (Data Encryption Standard). While more secure than DES, 3DES is still considered less secure and slower than modern encryption methods like AES. AES has largely replaced 3DES due to its higher efficiency and stronger security.
To ensure the security of backhaul links in a mesh network, AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) is the preferred encryption method due to its high level of security, efficiency, and widespread adoption in modern wireless technologies. By using AES encryption, the mesh network can safeguard data transmission between nodes, providing a secure communication channel that is resistant to unauthorized access and attacks.
Question No 5:
An engineer is conducting a wireless site survey in a hospital to ensure optimal wireless network performance. During the survey, the engineer needs to identify potential Layer 1 interferers, particularly sources of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz RF noise that may degrade the quality of the wireless signal.
In which two areas is the engineer most likely to find sources of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz RF noise? (Choose two.)
A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
B. Kitchen
C. Gamma Knife radiation treatment
D. X-ray radiography
E. Patient room
Correct Answers:
A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
B. Kitchen
In a hospital environment, wireless site surveys are essential to ensure uninterrupted connectivity for medical staff and devices. RF (Radio Frequency) noise can severely affect wireless network performance, especially in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, which are commonly used for Wi-Fi communication. Identifying potential Layer 1 interferers is crucial for mitigating the impact of RF noise.
A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI):
MRI machines are a known source of RF interference, especially in the 2.4 GHz band. MRI machines operate using powerful magnetic fields and radio frequency signals to generate images of the inside of the body. These magnetic and RF signals can extend into the wireless spectrum, creating significant RF noise that can interfere with the performance of nearby wireless networks. Engineers should expect potential disruptions in the area surrounding MRI machines, particularly in the vicinity of the scanning equipment itself.
B. Kitchen:
Kitchens in hospitals or medical facilities often contain multiple electrical appliances such as microwaves, which are another major source of 2.4 GHz RF interference. Microwaves operate within the same frequency range as many wireless networks (2.4 GHz), and when they are in use, they can cause disruptions in the wireless signal. RF interference from microwaves can lead to significant degradation in Wi-Fi signal quality, especially if the microwave is in close proximity to access points or client devices.
C. Gamma Knife Radiation Treatment:
Gamma Knife treatment involves using focused radiation to treat certain medical conditions, such as brain tumors. While the radiation is intense, it is not known to interfere with RF signals in the 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz ranges. The treatment's focus on ionizing radiation does not typically generate significant electromagnetic interference in the wireless spectrum used by Wi-Fi networks.
D. X-ray Radiography:
X-ray machines use ionizing radiation for imaging purposes, but they do not directly contribute to RF interference in the 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz bands. While the equipment generates electromagnetic energy, this energy operates at different frequencies, typically much higher than those used by wireless networks, so it is unlikely to be a source of interference for the Wi-Fi spectrum.
E. Patient Room:
A patient room is unlikely to be a direct source of RF interference, unless specific medical devices in the room are emitting interference. While medical devices like electronic patient monitoring equipment can occasionally cause RF interference, they typically do not operate in the same frequency range as wireless networks (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz). Furthermore, patient rooms usually have fewer sources of RF noise compared to areas with heavy medical equipment.
For engineers conducting wireless site surveys in hospitals, the primary sources of 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz RF noise are likely to be Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machines and kitchens, where appliances like microwaves generate interference. Understanding these sources allows the engineer to plan wireless network placements effectively, ensuring reliable performance throughout the facility.
Question No 6:
You are preparing to conduct a fully measured wireless site survey for a building with multiple floors. To ensure accurate results, you need to gather the right tools and equipment. The survey will include measuring signal strength, signal-to-noise ratio, and coverage area, among other factors.
Which three pieces of equipment are needed to conduct a fully measured wireless survey? (Choose three.)
A. PoE battery
B. Spirit level
C. Access point
D. Tall tripod
E. Goggles
F. Ladder
Correct Answers:
B. Spirit level
C. Access point
F. Ladder
When performing a fully measured wireless site survey, you need the proper equipment to measure various parameters, including signal strength, coverage area, and interference. Here’s why each piece of equipment is necessary for conducting an accurate and effective survey:
B. Spirit Level: A spirit level (or bubble level) is used to ensure that your access points (APs) or any surveying equipment are mounted in a perfectly horizontal or vertical position. Accurate measurements are essential in a wireless site survey, and any tilt in the equipment can lead to distorted signal strength readings, which can affect your overall results. Ensuring that the access points are level guarantees that your survey reflects true performance across the space.
C. Access Point: An access point (AP) is critical for conducting a wireless survey, as it is used to simulate a live network connection. By using an actual AP (or a temporary survey AP), you can measure the network's signal strength and coverage area from the AP’s perspective. Without an access point, you cannot accurately assess the wireless network’s performance or identify weak spots and areas requiring additional coverage.
F. Ladder: A ladder is needed to safely place the access point at the correct height during the survey. Many surveys require placing the AP at an optimal height to measure coverage effectively, typically on the ceiling or high up on walls. The ladder allows you to safely reach high locations and position the AP for accurate measurements. Without it, the survey would be limited to low-lying areas, leading to skewed results and incomplete coverage assessment.
A. PoE Battery:
While PoE (Power over Ethernet) is important for powering your access point during the survey, the PoE battery is not an essential piece of equipment for the survey itself. You can use PoE injectors or PoE switches to power the AP during the survey, so a PoE battery is not strictly necessary.
D. Tall Tripod:
A tall tripod is typically used for mounting cameras or other equipment, but it is not usually required for conducting a wireless survey. A ladder is much more practical for mounting access points at the proper height and doesn’t add unnecessary complexity to the survey.
E. Goggles:
Goggles are not required for a typical wireless site survey. While they might be used for personal safety in certain environments, they are not directly related to the tools needed for measuring and assessing wireless signal coverage and performance.
To conduct a fully measured wireless site survey, you need a spirit level to ensure accurate placement of equipment, an access point to measure the wireless network’s coverage, and a ladder to position the access point at an optimal height for accurate measurements. These three pieces of equipment are essential for obtaining reliable survey results and ensuring your wireless network deployment is well-optimized.
Question No 7:
You are conducting a site survey for real-time traffic over a wireless network, specifically focusing on the devices that will connect to it. As part of the survey, you need to consider the design and performance characteristics of smartphones and tablets, as these devices will be a significant part of the user base. These devices are expected to handle real-time traffic, such as video calls, VoIP, and other bandwidth-sensitive applications.
Which two design capabilities of smartphones and tablets must be considered when conducting this type of survey? (Choose two.)
A. No support for 802.11ac
B. Higher data rates than laptops
C. Fewer antennas than laptops
D. No support for 802.11r
E. Lower data rates than laptops
Correct Answers:
C. Fewer antennas than laptops
E. Lower data rates than laptops
When conducting a site survey for real-time traffic over a wireless network, it's important to consider the specific characteristics of the smartphones and tablets that will connect to the network. These devices have certain limitations and differences compared to laptops, which can affect their performance on the network, especially when it comes to real-time services like VoIP or video streaming.
C. Fewer antennas than laptops: Smartphones and tablets typically have fewer antennas than laptops. Laptops often have multiple internal antennas (sometimes three or more) for better MIMO (Multiple Input, Multiple Output) support, which enables them to take advantage of higher throughput and better coverage. In contrast, smartphones and tablets may have only one or two antennas, which can limit their ability to support high-speed connections or robust signal reception. This limitation should be considered during a site survey because it may impact the performance of real-time traffic, especially in high-interference or low-signal areas. You may need to plan for more access points or stronger signals to compensate for this.
E. Lower data rates than laptops: Smartphones and tablets generally have lower data rates compared to laptops. While laptops often support higher Wi-Fi standards (like 802.11ac or 802.11ax) with multiple antennas and can handle higher throughput, smartphones and tablets may be limited by smaller antennas and older Wi-Fi standards (such as 802.11n or 802.11g). This can affect their ability to transmit and receive large amounts of data quickly, especially in environments with high network traffic. Real-time applications like video conferencing and VoIP calls are sensitive to latency and packet loss, so ensuring that the network design can accommodate the lower data rates of these devices is crucial.
A. No support for 802.11ac:
Many modern smartphones and tablets do support 802.11ac or 802.11ax, which are advanced Wi-Fi standards capable of handling high-speed data transmission. It's not necessarily true that smartphones and tablets lack support for this standard. However, the number of antennas and device-specific limitations can still affect their ability to use these standards effectively.
B. Higher data rates than laptops:
While smartphones and tablets may be designed for high mobility, they typically do not have higher data rates than laptops. Laptops generally support higher-speed connections due to their larger antennas, better processing power, and support for MIMO technology.
D. No support for 802.11r:
802.11r is a roaming standard that improves the performance of devices as they move between access points, particularly in environments with real-time traffic. While it is true that some older smartphones and tablets might not support 802.11r, many modern devices do support it. However, for the purpose of this survey, lower data rates and fewer antennas are more likely to be relevant factors that affect the design and performance of real-time traffic.
When designing a wireless network to support real-time traffic for smartphones and tablets, it's essential to account for their fewer antennas and lower data rates compared to laptops. These factors can significantly affect the performance and coverage of the network, especially in environments requiring high bandwidth, such as for VoIP or video calls. Ensuring that the network design accommodates these limitations will help deliver a better overall user experience for real-time applications.
Question No 8:
You are preparing to conduct an outdoor bridge site survey for a wireless network installation that will connect two distant locations. The goal of this survey is to ensure that the wireless bridge link will operate efficiently and without interference. The survey is critical in identifying and mitigating potential obstacles that could negatively impact the performance of the wireless link.
Which two factors must be considered when conducting an outdoor bridge site survey? (Choose two.)
A. Near-far effect
B. Weather
C. Traffic lights
D. Power lines
E. Fresnel zone
Correct Answers:
B. Weather
E. Fresnel zone
When conducting an outdoor bridge site survey for a wireless network, several critical factors need to be considered to ensure a reliable and high-performing link between two locations. This survey will focus on identifying potential obstacles and interferences that can impact the wireless signal, especially in outdoor environments where line-of-sight (LOS) is crucial.
B. Weather: Weather is a significant factor in the performance of wireless communication, particularly for outdoor bridge links. Rain, snow, fog, and high winds can all cause signal degradation. Heavy precipitation (like rain or snow) can absorb or scatter radio waves, leading to a loss of signal strength or higher latency. Therefore, it’s essential to account for typical weather patterns in the area where the wireless link will be installed. In regions prone to adverse weather conditions, such as snowstorms or rain, it may be necessary to use higher-powered equipment or higher frequencies that are less susceptible to these effects, or position the antennas to minimize exposure to weather elements.
E. Fresnel zone: The Fresnel zone is the area around the line-of-sight between two antennas that is critical for maintaining a clear signal path. Obstructions within the Fresnel zone can cause signal reflection, diffraction, or attenuation, which may lead to signal loss or reduced link quality. During a site survey, the Fresnel zone should be carefully evaluated to ensure there are no large objects (e.g., buildings, trees, or hills) within the zone that could block or degrade the signal. It's essential to ensure that there is clear line-of-sight and that no obstructions fall within 80-90% of the Fresnel zone's area.
A. Near-far effect:
While the near-far effect can be a concern in wireless communication, it is more relevant to systems where multiple transmitters are communicating with a receiver, such as in multi-point or mesh networks, rather than in a point-to-point bridge link. The near-far effect causes signals from closer transmitters to drown out the signals from farther ones, but it is not a primary concern for outdoor bridge surveys.
C. Traffic lights:
Traffic lights generally do not impact the performance of a wireless bridge. While they may cause minimal electromagnetic interference in very specific circumstances, they are not typically a concern for long-range outdoor wireless links, especially compared to weather and Fresnel zone issues.
D. Power lines:
Power lines can indeed interfere with wireless signals, especially if the link passes near high-voltage power transmission lines. However, they are typically a concern in scenarios where the wireless link passes through or near power infrastructure. While power lines may be an issue to consider, they are not as directly impactful to an outdoor bridge site survey as weather or the Fresnel zone.
When conducting an outdoor bridge site survey, it is essential to consider factors such as weather and the Fresnel zone to ensure the wireless link performs optimally. Weather conditions can affect the integrity of the signal, and a clear Fresnel zone is necessary to maintain signal quality and minimize interference. These two factors are crucial for maintaining a stable and reliable wireless bridge connection over long distances.
Question No 9:
An engineer is tasked with performing a predictive wireless design for a medical treatment environment that will support both data and voice services. The medical environment must ensure reliable connectivity for critical applications, including voice communication (VoWLAN) and data services, to maintain uninterrupted medical workflows and patient care.
What is the minimum wireless coverage requirement that the engineer should aim for in this design to meet the needs of both data and voice services?
A. Overlapping -72 dBm coverage from two access points
B. Continuous -67 dBm coverage from one access point
C. Continuous -72 dBm coverage from one access point
D. Overlapping -67 dBm coverage from two access points
Correct Answer:
D. Overlapping -67 dBm coverage from two access points
When designing a wireless network in a medical treatment environment, particularly one that will support both data and voice services, several key factors need to be considered to ensure the network meets the performance and reliability requirements of the environment. This includes taking into account both the coverage area and the quality of service (QoS) for critical applications like voice over WLAN (VoWLAN) and medical data exchange.
Voice and Data Services:
Voice communication is typically more sensitive to signal strength and latency than data communication. For high-quality VoWLAN services, maintaining a consistent, strong signal across the entire coverage area is crucial to ensure clear and uninterrupted voice calls. Data services, while also important, tend to be less sensitive to signal fluctuations.
Signal Strength and Coverage: In general, to provide reliable connectivity for real-time voice and data services, a minimum signal strength of -67 dBm is considered necessary. Signal strength below this threshold could lead to poor voice quality or packet loss, especially in an environment where devices may be in motion or have a high demand for network resources.
D. Overlapping -67 dBm coverage from two access points:
This answer provides the most reliable coverage for both voice and data services in the medical treatment environment. Overlapping coverage ensures that there are no dead spots or areas of weak signal strength. Having two access points providing coverage ensures that if one access point experiences interference or failure, the other can take over, thus improving network redundancy and reliability.
The -67 dBm signal strength is the minimum required for high-quality voice services like VoWLAN, which is critical in a medical environment for real-time communication. Overlapping coverage ensures that clients in the area can maintain a steady signal strength, even as they move around, minimizing disruptions to both data and voice communication.
A. Overlapping -72 dBm coverage from two access points:
While -72 dBm is acceptable for general data use, it is too low for high-quality voice services. The signal strength may not provide the necessary reliability for VoWLAN services, leading to poor voice quality and potential dropped calls in a medical environment, where consistent communication is essential.
B. Continuous -67 dBm coverage from one access point:
Continuous -67 dBm coverage from one access point might seem sufficient, but this approach lacks the redundancy and overlap provided by multiple access points. Relying on only one access point could result in coverage gaps or signal loss if the device moves too far from the access point, leading to dropped connections or poor performance.
C. Continuous -72 dBm coverage from one access point:
-72 dBm is generally too weak to provide reliable voice communication, especially for VoWLAN in a medical environment. While it might be adequate for data applications, it is insufficient for voice quality, making it unsuitable for this scenario where voice communication reliability is a priority.
For a predictive wireless design in a medical treatment environment, where both voice and data services are critical, the minimum requirement is to provide overlapping coverage at -67 dBm signal strength from at least two access points. This ensures network reliability, redundancy, and high-quality VoWLAN and data services to support the hospital’s operations.
Question No 10:
An engineer is using Metageek Chanalyzer to conduct a site survey in a wireless network environment. Metageek Chanalyzer is a popular tool for analyzing RF spectrum to help identify and troubleshoot sources of interference that might affect the performance of wireless networks.
Which non-Wi-Fi interferer can be identified using Metageek Chanalyzer?
A. PDAs
B. Jammers
C. Smartphones
D. Printers
Correct Answer:
B. Jammers
Metageek Chanalyzer is a powerful tool used for RF spectrum analysis, particularly designed to help Wi-Fi professionals identify and troubleshoot interference that could disrupt wireless networks. It works by providing detailed views of the radio frequency spectrum to visualize sources of interference and their potential impact on wireless communication. By using Metageek Chanalyzer, engineers can pinpoint non-Wi-Fi interferers that might be impacting the performance of Wi-Fi networks.
Metageek Chanalyzer helps network engineers and wireless professionals by visualizing the RF spectrum and analyzing the channels in use. It displays signals in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands, which are the common bands for Wi-Fi communications. Through this analysis, users can:
Identify Wi-Fi signals and assess channel usage.
Detect non-Wi-Fi signals that could cause interference.
Diagnose performance issues caused by interference from various sources.
Pinpoint sources of radio frequency interference (RFI) in the network environment.
There are many non-Wi-Fi interferers that can disrupt wireless communication in a network. These include microwave ovens, Bluetooth devices, cordless phones, and even jammers. These devices operate on similar frequencies as Wi-Fi networks and can create signal interference, leading to network slowdowns, drops, and performance degradation.
Jammers are devices designed to interfere with communication by emitting RF signals that overpower or block other signals on the same frequency.
Metageek Chanalyzer can detect jammers by visualizing their disruptive RF patterns, as they usually cause wide and intense signal spikes in specific areas of the spectrum.
Unlike Wi-Fi signals, jammers generally do not carry any usable data, but they occupy large sections of the spectrum, making it easy for Chanalyzer to identify their presence through spectrum analysis.
A. PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants):
PDAs, such as older models of handheld computers, are not likely to be sources of RF interference that Metageek Chanalyzer would typically detect. These devices don't emit significant RF interference that would disrupt wireless networks in a way that would be visible on a spectrum analyzer.
C. Smartphones:
While smartphones can create interference due to their use of Bluetooth, cellular data, or Wi-Fi, Chanalyzer is primarily designed to detect interference from external sources. Smartphones themselves are not typically analyzed unless they are emitting significant RF signals in the nearby spectrum (e.g., on an unlicensed band or due to malfunction).
D. Printers:
Printers, especially older models, can sometimes cause interference (e.g., laser printers emitting RF noise), but they are not typically identified by Metageek Chanalyzer as major sources of interference unless the printer has a specific issue. Chanalyzer would not usually focus on common household or office devices unless they are emitting significant interference.
The correct answer is B. Jammers, as Metageek Chanalyzer is most effective at identifying interference from devices like jammers, which generate RF noise that can block or disrupt Wi-Fi signals. By using the tool to monitor the spectrum and pinpoint these jammers, engineers can mitigate the impact of such interference on the wireless network and improve overall performance.
Top Training Courses
LIMITED OFFER: GET 30% Discount
This is ONE TIME OFFER
A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login. *We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.
Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator
Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.
Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.