• Home
• Cisco Exams
• 300-610 - Designing Cisco Data Center Infrastructure (DCID)

300-610 Cisco Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question No 1:

What is one key advantage of using Overlay Transport Virtualization (OTV) over Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) for data center redundancy?

A. Prevents loops on point-to-point links
B. Provides head-end replication
C. Uses proactive MAC advertisement
D. Provides full-mesh connectivity

Answer: B. Provides head-end replication

Explanation:

When comparing Overlay Transport Virtualization (OTV) and Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) for data center redundancy, one of the key advantages of OTV lies in its approach to data redundancy and replication. The correct answer here is B. Provides head-end replication.

Let’s break this down:

1. OTV Overview: Overlay Transport Virtualization (OTV) is a technology primarily used to extend Layer 2 domains across geographically dispersed data centers. OTV encapsulates Ethernet frames in an IP packet to transport them over an IP network, making it possible to extend a data center’s LAN to remote locations without the need for a complex, traditional Layer 2 link.

2. VPLS Overview: Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) is a multipoint-to-multipoint Layer 2 VPN technology. It allows the extension of Ethernet services over wide-area networks (WANs) to connect multiple sites. VPLS creates a virtual bridge across all participating sites, which can be advantageous for certain scenarios where full mesh connectivity is required.

3. Head-End Replication in OTV: One of the critical advantages of OTV, when compared to VPLS, is head-end replication. In OTV, the replication of multicast and broadcast traffic is performed at the originating site (the head-end), where the traffic is replicated and sent to other data centers. This means that only the head-end router is responsible for replicating and forwarding the traffic across the WAN, preventing unnecessary replication in the core network. This reduces the bandwidth usage and enhances the overall efficiency of the network. As a result, it improves scalability, making OTV a more efficient option in large-scale, multi-site data center environments.

4. VPLS Limitations in Redundancy: VPLS, while providing full-mesh connectivity and supporting redundancy, tends to replicate broadcast, multicast, and unknown unicast traffic across all participating sites. This can lead to higher bandwidth consumption, especially in large-scale environments with many endpoints. Additionally, VPLS doesn’t have the same centralized replication model as OTV, making it less efficient in terms of WAN bandwidth utilization.

5. Why Head-End Replication is Better for Redundancy: The primary advantage of head-end replication in OTV is that it centralizes the multicast/broadcast replication process at a single point, making the WAN network more efficient. By doing so, OTV limits the impact of redundant data transfers across the network, improving overall performance, especially in scenarios where traffic volume and redundancy are high.

While VPLS offers full-mesh connectivity and is widely used for creating large-scale Layer 2 VPNs, OTV’s ability to provide head-end replication stands out as a clear advantage, especially for data center redundancy. By efficiently managing broadcast and multicast traffic, OTV reduces bandwidth consumption and increases the scalability of the network, making it a preferred choice for many modern data center environments.

Question No 2:

Which multicast rendezvous point (RP) redundancy mode is valid for Bidirectional PIM (Protocol Independent Multicast)?

A. Embedded RP
B. Phantom RP
C. MSDP
D. PIM Anycast RP

Answer:

The correct answer is D. PIM Anycast RP.

Explanation:

In the context of multicast routing, a Rendezvous Point (RP) serves as the central point for multicast sources and receivers to meet in protocols like PIM-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM) or Bidirectional PIM (BIDIR-PIM). When multicast traffic needs to be forwarded, the RP plays an essential role in managing the distribution tree. However, redundancy of the RP is critical for preventing a single point of failure in multicast networks.

Bidirectional PIM Overview:
Bidirectional PIM (BIDIR-PIM) is a multicast routing protocol that simplifies the distribution of multicast traffic by supporting a shared bidirectional distribution tree. In contrast to traditional PIM-SM, where a source-specific tree (SPT) is built, BIDIR-PIM always uses a shared tree between sources and receivers. One key feature of BIDIR-PIM is that it requires the use of an RP, just like PIM-SM, but the RP is part of the shared tree, meaning it handles traffic from both sources and receivers bidirectionally.

PIM Anycast RP:
PIM Anycast RP (Answer D) is the correct redundancy mode for BIDIR-PIM. In this mode, multiple RPs can be configured to share the same IP address (i.e., anycast address), but the physical location of the RP is not fixed. The PIM routers automatically choose the "closest" RP based on network distance (using routing protocols like OSPF or BGP). This redundancy mechanism ensures that if one RP fails, another RP with the same anycast address can take over without disrupting multicast traffic. The use of Anycast RP is critical in ensuring that the shared tree in BIDIR-PIM can still function without a single point of failure, making it highly resilient and scalable.

Other Options:

• A. Embedded RP:
  Embedded RP is a technique used primarily in PIM-SM where the RP is embedded within the multicast group address range. It is not applicable for BIDIR-PIM, as it is designed for unidirectional multicast traffic, where receivers only join the multicast group but do not send data back to the source.

• B. Phantom RP:
  Phantom RP is an extension of Embedded RP but is still not suitable for BIDIR-PIM. It provides a mechanism to hide the physical location of the RP in certain scenarios but doesn’t inherently offer the redundancy or anycast capabilities needed in BIDIR-PIM.

• C. MSDP (Multicast Source Discovery Protocol):
  MSDP is a protocol used to exchange information about multicast sources across different multicast domains. It is not a redundancy mechanism for RPs in PIM, and it does not provide the direct RP redundancy that BIDIR-PIM requires.

The most valid and efficient RP redundancy mode for BIDIR-PIM is PIM Anycast RP, which ensures that multiple RP instances can exist for redundancy, providing high availability and load balancing for multicast traffic. This redundancy model prevents any single failure from disrupting multicast service, which is crucial in large-scale multicast networks.

Question No 3:

An engineer is deploying LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol) VM (Virtual Machine) mobility within a network. Which feature must be configured on the interfaces to support VM mobility?

A. IP Redirects
B. Flow Control
C. Proxy ARP
D. HSRP

Answer:

The correct answer is C. Proxy ARP.

Explanation:

LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol) is a network architecture protocol designed to separate the endpoint identifier (EID) and routing locator (RLOC) for improved scalability and flexibility in data centers, especially in scenarios involving virtual machines (VMs). One of the primary use cases for LISP is to support VM mobility across data centers or between physical servers. As virtual machines move within a network, maintaining the continuity of communication is crucial, which is where features like Proxy ARP come into play.

When a VM moves between different physical hosts or across different subnets, it might still maintain the same IP address (its Endpoint Identifier or EID). However, the physical location of the VM changes, which means the routing locator (RLOC) associated with that VM also changes. To address this challenge, the system must map the VM’s IP address (EID) to the new RLOC.

Proxy ARP is the feature that helps solve this problem. It enables an interface on a network device (such as a router or switch) to respond to ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) requests for IP addresses that are not directly on that device’s subnet. This is particularly useful in a LISP deployment where the VM’s EID (IP address) might belong to a different subnet or physical location, but the Proxy ARP can make it appear as though the device is locally reachable.

Here’s how Proxy ARP works in the context of LISP VM mobility:

1. VM Mobility: A VM with a specific IP address moves from one host to another, but the IP address remains the same (its EID).

2. Routing Change: The VM’s RLOC changes to reflect the new physical location or subnet of the VM.

3. ARP Request: A device attempting to communicate with the VM sends an ARP request to resolve the IP address (EID) to a MAC address.

4. Proxy ARP Response: The router or switch (configured with Proxy ARP) will respond to the ARP request on behalf of the VM, providing the correct MAC address of the VM's new location.

By using Proxy ARP, the network ensures that devices attempting to communicate with the VM can still reach it, despite its physical relocation. This reduces disruptions in communication and ensures seamless mobility for VMs.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

• A. IP Redirects: IP redirects are typically used to inform hosts of a better route for a destination. While useful for routing optimization, they are not directly related to VM mobility or addressing the challenges that arise from moving VMs within a network.

• B. Flow Control: Flow control is a technique used to manage data flow between devices, especially to prevent network congestion. It does not specifically relate to the challenges of VM mobility or the resolution of EIDs to RLOCs.

• D. HSRP: Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP) is a redundancy protocol used to create a virtual router for fault tolerance. It doesn’t play a role in managing or supporting VM mobility within a LISP deployment.

In summary, Proxy ARP is the correct feature that enables VM mobility by ensuring that devices can communicate with VMs even after they move between different physical locations in the network.

Question No 4:

What are two key advantages of utilizing Cisco Virtual Port Channel (vPC) technology over traditional access layer network designs? (Select two.)

A. Supports Layer 3 port channels
B. Disables Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
C. Eliminates Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) blocked ports
D. Utilizes all available uplink bandwidth
E. Maintains a single control plane

Answer:

The correct answers are:
C. Eliminates Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) blocked ports
D. Utilizes all available uplink bandwidth

Explanation:

Cisco’s Virtual Port Channel (vPC) is a technology that enhances the scalability and redundancy of network designs, particularly in data center and high-availability environments. When comparing vPC to traditional access layer designs, two significant advantages stand out: elimination of STP blocked ports and the ability to utilize all available uplink bandwidth.

1. Eliminates Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) Blocked Ports (Answer C):

In traditional Layer 2 designs, Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) is used to prevent network loops by blocking redundant links. While STP is crucial for network stability, it results in some links being inactive or "blocked" under normal conditions. This means that even if multiple paths exist between switches, only one path is actively used, leaving others underutilized.

With vPC, Cisco creates a logically aggregated link between two switches that appear as a single logical switch to end devices. vPC allows the network to use multiple uplinks simultaneously, thereby eliminating the need for blocked ports. As a result, all available paths between switches can be utilized, increasing overall network efficiency and redundancy without the need to rely on STP to block redundant links.

2. Utilizes All Available Uplink Bandwidth (Answer D):

Another significant advantage of vPC is its ability to utilize all available uplink bandwidth. In traditional access layer designs, only one link is typically active due to the blocking of redundant paths by STP. This means that additional uplinks, even if they are physically connected, are not used unless the primary path fails.

With vPC, both uplinks are actively used for data transmission. The virtual port channel allows traffic to flow simultaneously across both links, thereby maximizing available bandwidth. This leads to better utilization of the network's capacity and higher throughput, making vPC ideal for high-traffic environments where network performance is critical.

Why the Other Options Are Not Correct:

• A. Supports Layer 3 Port Channels:
  vPC primarily operates at Layer 2, enabling multiple switches to appear as one logical switch. While vPC does support Layer 3 functionality, it is not one of the primary advantages compared to traditional designs, which focus on Layer 2 redundancy and performance.

• B. Disables Spanning Tree Protocol (STP):
  While vPC significantly reduces the reliance on STP for preventing loops, it does not fully disable STP. Instead, vPC allows for the creation of loop-free environments by using the concept of vPC peer links and vPC domain. STP still operates at a minimal level to prevent loops in specific circumstances, but the protocol itself is not disabled entirely.

• E. Maintains a Single Control Plane:
  vPC operates by maintaining a control plane between the two vPC peer switches, which is crucial for consistent configuration and state synchronization. However, this is more about redundancy and control consistency rather than a direct advantage over traditional designs, which may also use similar control plane methods for synchronization.

In conclusion, eliminating STP blocked ports and utilizing all available uplink bandwidth are two of the key advantages of Cisco vPC technology. These features make vPC a superior choice for environments that require high availability, redundancy, and optimal network performance.

Question No 5:

What is a key design consideration when implementing Fabric Shortest Path First (FSPF) in a Fibre Channel network?

A. Routes are based on the domain ID.
B. Routes are based on the distance vector protocol.
C. FSPF runs only on F Ports.
D. FSPF runs on a per-chassis basis.

Answer: D. FSPF runs on a per-chassis basis.

Explanation:

Fabric Shortest Path First (FSPF) is a routing protocol used within Fibre Channel networks to manage the paths that data packets take through a fabric of switches. It is specifically designed to ensure efficient routing by dynamically determining the best path for data to travel between devices in a SAN (Storage Area Network). When implementing FSPF, there are several important design considerations to keep in mind.

The Role of FSPF in Fibre Channel Networks:

FSPF operates on a per-chassis basis, which means that each Fibre Channel switch in a network independently calculates its routing table based on the state of the fabric around it. This includes neighboring switches, topology changes, and link status. Each switch in the fabric uses FSPF to communicate with its directly connected neighbors, forming a consistent and optimized routing map of the network. This per-chassis approach helps ensure that routing decisions are localized to each switch, allowing for better scalability and fault tolerance. If one switch fails or is reconfigured, the rest of the fabric can quickly adapt without significant disruptions.

Design Consideration:

FSPF running on a per-chassis basis is important because it helps isolate the potential impacts of network changes. When a switch or port is added, removed, or fails, only the directly affected switch or switches will need to recalculate their routing tables. This minimizes the impact of topology changes and ensures that the fabric can recover more quickly from failures, providing higher availability for the entire storage network.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

• A. Routes are based on the domain ID: While domain IDs are important in Fibre Channel fabrics to uniquely identify switches, FSPF does not base its routing decisions solely on the domain ID. The protocol considers factors such as link state and topology when making routing decisions, not just the domain ID.

• B. Routes are based on the distance vector protocol: FSPF is actually based on a link-state protocol, not a distance-vector protocol. Link-state protocols, like FSPF, require each switch to have a complete view of the network topology, while distance-vector protocols only share distance metrics with neighbors, potentially leading to slower convergence and less optimal paths.

• C. FSPF runs only on F Ports: FSPF is not limited to F Ports (Fabric Ports), which are used to connect devices like host bus adapters (HBAs) and storage devices to a switch. FSPF runs across all ports of the switch, including E Ports (Expansion Ports), and is used for routing between different switches in the fabric.

In summary, FSPF's operation on a per-chassis basis is a crucial design consideration when implementing this protocol. It ensures that each switch independently manages its routing decisions, providing scalability, fault tolerance, and efficient path selection for the entire Fibre Channel network.

Question No 6:

Which two features are enabled by deploying an Out-of-Band (OOB) management network in a Cisco Nexus data center? (Choose two.)

A. A Layer 3 path dedicated to monitoring and management purposes
B. A Layer 2 path for carrying server traffic
C. A Layer 2 path used for the vPC peer link
D. A Layer 3 path specifically for vPC keepalive packets
E. A Layer 3 path used for server traffic communication

Answer:

The correct answers are

A. A Layer 3 path dedicated to monitoring and management purposes and 

D. A Layer 3 path specifically for vPC keepalive packets.

Explanation:

In a Cisco Nexus data center, network management and monitoring play critical roles in ensuring the health, security, and performance of the infrastructure. Deploying an Out-of-Band (OOB) management network allows for a separate physical network dedicated exclusively to management and monitoring tasks, keeping it isolated from the regular data traffic and reducing the impact of any network issues on management operations.

Let’s break down the key features and why the correct answers are what they are:

1. Option A: A Layer 3 path dedicated to monitoring and management purposes
   When you deploy an OOB network, it provides a dedicated Layer 3 (IP-based) network path for management and monitoring tools. This network is isolated from the main production network, ensuring that network administrators can manage and monitor devices even if the main network is down or congested. This is important for maintaining control and visibility over the data center infrastructure without being affected by production traffic.
   
   In this setup, management tasks like configuration, updates, and troubleshooting can be performed independently of the operational network traffic.
   
   

2. Option B: A Layer 2 path for carrying server traffic
   The OOB management network is not used for carrying regular server traffic, so this option is incorrect. The primary purpose of the OOB network is for management, not for the data traffic generated by the servers. Server traffic usually resides on the main network paths that carry production data, and it typically operates at Layer 2 or Layer 3 within the data center.

3. Option C: A Layer 2 path used for the vPC peer link
   The vPC (Virtual Port Channel) peer link is used to connect two Nexus switches for redundancy and load balancing, allowing both switches to appear as one logical switch to downstream devices. This peer link typically operates at Layer 2, but it is not related to the OOB management network. The OOB network is meant for management traffic, not for carrying vPC peer link traffic.

4. Option D: A Layer 3 path specifically for vPC keepalive packets
   The vPC keepalive packets are crucial for maintaining synchronization between the two Nexus switches in a vPC configuration. These keepalive packets are used to monitor the health of the vPC peer link and ensure that both switches are aware of each other's status. When an OOB management network is deployed, it provides a Layer 3 path for these keepalive packets. This ensures that if there is a failure in the regular data network or peer link, the OOB network can still carry essential control traffic, including vPC keepalive messages.

5. Option E: A Layer 3 path used for server traffic communication
   This option is incorrect because server traffic typically travels over the regular production network, not the OOB network. The OOB network is only dedicated to management and monitoring tasks, and it does not carry application or server data traffic.

By deploying an OOB management network in a Cisco Nexus data center, the organization ensures the ability to manage, monitor, and troubleshoot the network effectively and securely, even if the main data network encounters issues. Key features provided by the OOB network include a Layer 3 path for management and monitoring purposes (Option A) and a Layer 3 path for vPC keepalive packets (Option D). These features help maintain the health of the network and ensure operational continuity, making OOB an essential part of a robust data center management strategy.

Question No 7:

In a Cisco Nexus switch environment, where Virtual Device Context (VDC) is enabled, out-of-band (OOB) management is provided over an isolated network. 

How is out-of-band management access provided for each VDC in a Cisco Nexus core switch?

A. All the VDCs share the same out-of-band IP address.
B. Each VDC has a dedicated out-of-band Ethernet management port.
C. Each VDC has a unique out-of-band IP address within the same IP subnet.
D. Each VDC has a unique out-of-band IP address from different IP subnets among VDCs.

Correct Answer: C. Each VDC has a unique out-of-band IP address within the same IP subnet.

Explanation:

Out-of-band (OOB) management allows administrators to manage and monitor network devices like switches and routers over a separate, isolated network that is physically or logically distinct from the production or data network. This approach ensures that even if the data network goes down, the network administrators can still access the switch for troubleshooting, configuration, and recovery tasks. In a Cisco Nexus environment, especially with Virtual Device Context (VDC) enabled, the management of each logical device is handled separately, allowing multiple virtual switches to operate within a single physical Nexus chassis.

VDC (Virtual Device Context) Overview:

VDC is a feature available in Cisco Nexus switches that allows the creation of multiple virtual devices within a single physical switch. Each VDC functions as an independent switch with its own configuration, management, and forwarding behavior. Each VDC can have its own out-of-band management access, separate from other VDCs.

How Out-of-Band Management Works with VDCs:

In a Cisco Nexus switch that is configured with VDCs, the out-of-band management access is provided via dedicated management ports. While each VDC operates as a separate logical switch, the management of each VDC is accomplished through unique management IP addresses, which are used to access the switch's command-line interface (CLI) or web-based management tools.

• Option A: All VDCs share the same out-of-band IP address
  This option is incorrect. Cisco Nexus switches with VDCs do not share a single OOB IP address. Each VDC needs to be individually accessible for management, and therefore, it requires a distinct IP address. Sharing an IP address across all VDCs would violate the concept of isolation and independent management for each virtual switch.

• Option B: Each VDC has a dedicated out-of-band Ethernet management port
  This is incorrect because while each VDC requires a unique management IP address, the ports themselves are typically shared. The Nexus switch may have a single physical management port for multiple VDCs, and logically, the system can assign different IP addresses to each VDC. The ports themselves aren't necessarily separate for each VDC, but the IP addresses are.

• Option C: Each VDC has a unique out-of-band IP address within the same IP subnet
  This is the correct answer. In most cases, all VDCs within the same physical Nexus switch can be managed over the same OOB network (subnet). While the IP addresses for each VDC will be unique to prevent overlap, they are typically in the same subnet, making it easier for network administrators to manage and troubleshoot all VDCs using a shared subnet for out-of-band management.

• Option D: Each VDC has a unique out-of-band IP address from different IP subnets among VDCs
  This option is also incorrect. Although each VDC has a unique IP address for management purposes, they do not need to be in different subnets. Keeping all VDCs in the same subnet simplifies the network configuration and ensures the switches can communicate with each other if needed. Having different subnets per VDC would add unnecessary complexity.

In Cisco Nexus switches with VDCs enabled, the management of each VDC is performed over an out-of-band network, where each VDC is assigned a unique IP address. However, these IP addresses typically reside within the same subnet for ease of management and configuration, which is the basis for the correct answer: Option C. This setup provides the flexibility to manage each VDC independently while maintaining simplicity in network design.

Question No 8:

You need to route traffic between two Virtual Device Contexts (VDCs) in a Cisco Nexus switch environment. Which of the following configurations can be used to achieve this? (Choose two.)

A. Connect the VDCs to an external Layer 3 device.
B. Cross-connect the ports between the VDCs.
C. Create VRF-aware software infrastructure interfaces.
D. Create a policy map in the default VDC that routes traffic between the VDCs.
E. Create interfaces in the VDC that can be accessed by another VDC.

Correct Answers:

A. Connect the VDCs to an external Layer 3 device.
E. Create interfaces in the VDC that can be accessed by another VDC.

Explanation:

In a Cisco Nexus switch, Virtual Device Contexts (VDCs) enable the creation of multiple logical switches within a single physical device. Each VDC operates as a separate instance, with its own control plane, forwarding plane, and management plane. However, when you want to route traffic between two VDCs, you need to configure the appropriate mechanisms to enable inter-VDC communication.

Let’s break down the correct answer choices and explain why they work:

1. A. Connect the VDCs to an external Layer 3 device: One common way to route traffic between two VDCs is by connecting the VDCs to an external Layer 3 device, such as a router or Layer 3 switch. In this scenario, each VDC can have its own Layer 3 interface (routed interface), and the external device can serve as the intermediary that routes traffic between the two VDCs. This approach works because the Layer 3 device can handle the routing and direct traffic accordingly. The Nexus switch would need to have a Layer 3 interface or VLAN interfaces configured to allow the traffic between the VDCs to traverse the external device.

2. E. Create interfaces in the VDC that can be accessed by another VDC: You can configure interfaces in each VDC that are designed to be accessed by another VDC. This method allows the two VDCs to communicate by creating dedicated interfaces for the inter-VDC connection, typically using VDC-to-VDC links or inter-VDC routing. In practice, this might involve configuring Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) or similar routing protocols on the interfaces that bridge the VDCs together.

Now, let’s review the incorrect options:

B. Cross-connect the ports between the VDCs: This option is not valid because cross-connecting the ports directly between VDCs would not allow for the necessary routing functionality. Inter-VDC communication requires logical routing configurations rather than simple physical port connections.

C. Create VRF-aware software infrastructure interfaces: While VRF-aware interfaces are useful for isolating traffic within each VDC, they are not specifically designed to route traffic between VDCs. For inter-VDC communication, a different approach, such as using external devices or dedicated interfaces, is needed.

D. Create a policy map in the default VDC that routes traffic between the VDCs: This approach is not correct. A policy map is primarily used to define QoS (Quality of Service) policies, not for routing between VDCs. Routing between VDCs involves configuring network interfaces or using external Layer 3 devices to handle traffic forwarding.

In summary, the most reliable methods to route traffic between two VDCs are to connect the VDCs to an external Layer 3 device (Option A) or create accessible interfaces in each VDC for inter-VDC communication (Option E).