• Home
• Salesforce Exams
• Certified AI Specialist

Certified AI Specialist Salesforce Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question No 1:

An AI Specialist has been assigned to build a custom prompt template for generating sales emails. To ensure the emails are highly personalized and contextually relevant, the template must incorporate specific data such as:

• Products included in the Opportunity

• Events happening near the customer's location

• Tone and voice examples tailored to the customer

What is the best method the AI Specialist should use to retrieve and integrate this diverse set of data into the prompt template?

A. Initiate a prompt-driven flow that collects and grounds the necessary data in real time.
B. Use a standard email template and manually input each of the required data points.
C. Build a flexible (Flex) template that accepts input records for data grounding.

Correct Answer: A. Initiate a prompt-driven flow that collects and grounds the necessary data in real time.

Explanation:

Creating a personalized sales email using generative AI in Salesforce requires grounding the AI model with accurate, real-time contextual data. This includes not only static CRM fields like Opportunity Products but also dynamic or external information such as local events and preferred communication tone or voice.

The best approach in this scenario is Option A: initiating a prompt-initiated flow. A prompt-initiated flow in Salesforce is a powerful mechanism that can dynamically fetch data across different objects and sources. It enables real-time data retrieval—such as looking up nearby events based on the customer's location or pulling tone examples based on prior communication—before feeding this information directly into the prompt for AI generation.

This method ensures the prompt receives fresh, relevant, and complete data, which improves the accuracy and effectiveness of the AI-generated email. The flow acts as an orchestrator, gathering data from related records, performing logic if needed, and grounding the AI prompt with a complete, structured dataset.

• Opportunity Products can be pulled from related records on the Opportunity object.

• Nearby events can be fetched via integration with geolocation services or event APIs using the customer’s location data.

• Tone and voice examples may be stored as custom metadata or derived from previous interactions and fed in accordingly.

Option B—manually inserting data into a standard template—is inefficient, prone to error, and lacks scalability, especially in environments with many dynamic data points.

Option C, using a Flex template, is partially correct. Flex templates allow for adaptable inputs, but without the dynamic data collection capabilities of a flow, they can't fully automate the grounding process when pulling from diverse data sources.

Therefore, Option A provides the best mix of automation, accuracy, and scalability—critical for enterprise-grade generative email systems.

Question No 2:

Universal Containers (UC) recently implemented Einstein Generative AI to help their support agents summarize case records efficiently. As part of this rollout, they created a custom prompt template specifically designed to generate concise summaries of customer cases. However, users have started reporting that the AI-generated summaries are missing important details or are not accurately reflecting the case content.

What could be the most likely cause behind this issue of poor AI-generated output?

A. The Einstein Trust Layer configuration is incorrect and affecting the AI’s behavior.
B. The data used to ground the AI prompt is either incorrect, outdated, or incomplete.
C. The version of the prompt template is not compatible with the large language model (LLM) in use.

Correct Answer:  B. The data used to ground the AI prompt is either incorrect, outdated, or incomplete.

Explanation:

When working with generative AI in Salesforce, especially for use cases like summarizing case records, data grounding is critical. Grounding refers to the process of feeding the AI with contextually relevant and structured data so that the output remains accurate, factual, and tailored to the scenario.

In this case, Option B is the correct answer. If the AI summaries are not providing the appropriate information, it is most likely because the data being used to ground the prompt is either missing key fields, incomplete, or not properly mapped. For example, if fields such as case description, latest customer notes, or resolution steps are not included in the grounding data, the AI won’t have sufficient context to generate a meaningful summary.

Generative AI does not "search" Salesforce on its own—it only uses the information provided to it at runtime. So, if critical case information is excluded or if outdated data is used, the AI will produce poor or irrelevant results.

Option A, regarding the Einstein Trust Layer, pertains to security, data masking, and compliance. While important, misconfiguration here wouldn’t typically affect the actual quality of the AI’s output—it would more likely affect what data is visible to the AI, possibly causing missing or redacted information, but not structural inaccuracy unless masking is over-applied.

Option C, prompt template version compatibility, is rarely a cause unless the model itself is being upgraded or significantly altered. Even then, Salesforce ensures backward compatibility for standard use cases.

Therefore, the most logical and impactful issue here is grounding data quality. Ensuring the right fields are included and up to date is essential for optimal AI performance in summarization tasks.

Question No 3:

An administrator at a company has just finished building a Flex Prompt Template using Salesforce's Prompt Builder. However, when they attempt to preview the output of their template, they notice that the “Preview” button is disabled (greyed out) and cannot be clicked. They want to understand why this is happening so they can properly test the prompt and view the expected AI-generated result.

What is the most likely reason that the preview feature is unavailable?

A. The administrator forgot to insert a merge field in the prompt text.
B. The prompt template is not linked to any relevant Salesforce record.
C. The prompt has not been saved and activated yet.

Correct Answer: B. The prompt template is not linked to any relevant Salesforce record.

Explanation:

When working with Flex Prompt Templates in Salesforce's Prompt Builder, administrators can preview how generative AI will respond based on a specific configuration of inputs and context. However, for the preview functionality to be enabled, certain prerequisites must be met.

The correct answer is Option B: The records related to the prompt have not been selected. Flex prompts rely on Salesforce records to provide the grounding data necessary for the AI to generate accurate and relevant output. Without selecting a record (for example, a Case, Opportunity, Account, or custom object), the system doesn’t know what data to supply to the AI model, so it disables the preview feature altogether.

In the Prompt Builder interface, administrators are prompted to choose a record from the object tied to the template (e.g., a sample Account or Opportunity) to simulate real-world usage. If no record is selected, Salesforce cannot generate a preview, because there’s no data to ground the AI response on. This is particularly important for testing how merge fields and conditional logic will function in actual usage.

Option A, while related to prompt design, is not the cause of the preview button being disabled. You can still preview prompts without merge fields, though they won’t be very meaningful.

Option C, regarding saving and activating the prompt, is also incorrect in this context. A prompt does not need to be activated to be previewed—it simply needs to be saved and linked to a record.

Thus, to resolve the issue, the administrator should select a record from the related object (using the “Choose Record” option in Prompt Builder) so the system has the necessary data context to generate and preview the prompt’s AI output.

Question No 4:

Universal Containers (UC) is looking to enhance their customer service operations by offering personalized service experiences. Their goal is to reduce agent handling time by utilizing AI-generated email responses that are accurately grounded in existing Knowledge Base articles. The solution should allow for quick, consistent, and intelligent replies to customer queries over email.

Which Salesforce AI capability should UC implement to best meet these requirements?

A. Einstein Email Replies – Uses AI to suggest short replies based on case context.
B. Einstein Generative Service Replies for Email – Uses generative AI to compose complete email replies, grounded in Knowledge Base content.
C. Einstein Service Replies for Email – Sends rule-based or predefined responses for common service inquiries.

Correct Answer: B. Einstein Generative Service Replies for Email

Explanation:

To deliver highly personalized customer service and minimize agent workload, UC needs an AI-powered solution that can dynamically generate complete email responses using contextual information and relevant Knowledge Base articles. The ideal tool must not only automate response generation but also ensure the content is accurate, relevant, and trustworthy.

Option B: Einstein Generative Service Replies for Email is the correct choice. This feature leverages Salesforce’s generative AI capabilities to compose full-length, context-aware replies that are grounded in Knowledge Base content. It allows the AI to understand a customer's inquiry and pull precise, informative content from existing articles to formulate a natural, professional email. This ensures both personalization and factual correctness.

Key benefits of this capability include:

• Reduction in agent workload by generating email drafts.

• Consistency in tone, structure, and information across all customer communications.

• Real-time use of the Knowledge Base, ensuring the most current content is referenced.

• High-quality customer experience, as responses are not limited to static templates.

Option A: Einstein Email Replies is more limited in scope. It typically provides short response suggestions for customer service cases based on predefined models. It does not utilize generative AI to create full emails or reference the Knowledge Base in a deep, contextual way.

Option C: Einstein Service Replies for Email is primarily rule-based or uses structured data and templates. It may be effective for repetitive or transactional inquiries, but it lacks the adaptability and natural language generation that UC requires for personalized service at scale.

In summary, for intelligent, scalable, and context-rich AI-generated responses grounded in trusted content, Einstein Generative Service Replies for Email is the most suitable and advanced solution for UC.

Question No 5:

An AI Specialist at Universal Containers has recently implemented Data Masking using the Einstein Trust Layer to ensure that sensitive information (such as PII or financial details) is properly redacted or anonymized before being passed to the AI model. Now, the specialist wants to verify whether the correct fields are being masked in accordance with internal data privacy policies and compliance standards.

What is the appropriate method the AI Specialist should use to begin validating that the masking is working as expected?

A. Use a Flow-based resource in Prompt Builder and debug the field values using Flow Debugger.
B. Enable the option to collect and store Einstein Generative AI Audit Data via the Einstein Feedback setup page.
C. Access the Einstein Generative AI Audit Data by requesting it from the Security section in the Setup menu.

Correct Answer: C. Access the Einstein Generative AI Audit Data by requesting it from the Security section in the Setup menu.

Explanation:

Data Masking within the Einstein Trust Layer is a critical security feature that ensures personally identifiable information (PII), health data, financial data, and other sensitive fields are not exposed to AI models during processing. Once configured, it’s essential to validate and audit the implementation to ensure compliance and security.

The correct answer is Option C: The AI Specialist should access the Einstein Generative AI Audit Data through the Security section of the Salesforce Setup menu. This audit data provides a clear record of what data was masked, what data was passed to the AI model, and how masking rules were applied. It is the most direct and reliable way to confirm whether specific fields are being masked as expected.

This audit data includes:

• Before-and-after views of masked fields

• Timestamps of interactions

• Prompt context and grounding data

• LLM responses

This level of transparency helps validate the system’s behavior, assists with internal audits, and ensures compliance with regulations like GDPR or HIPAA.

Option A, using a Flow Debugger, is a helpful tool for troubleshooting automation logic but does not show how data masking behaves at the Trust Layer level. It’s more suited for field value testing or logic branching, not AI data handling.

Option B, enabling audit data collection on the Einstein Feedback setup page, is a prerequisite step to capture data but does not, by itself, allow you to view or validate masking. It only ensures data is collected. You must still go to the Security section in Setup to request or download that audit data.

In summary, for compliance-grade validation of data masking, Option C provides the proper visibility and audit trail necessary for enterprise security assurance.

Question No 6:

An AI Specialist needs to create a prompt template in Salesforce that will populate a custom field, called Latest Opportunities Summary, on the Account object. This field should be populated with information from the three most recently opened Opportunities associated with that Account. The AI Specialist needs to gather the necessary data to populate this field accurately.

What is the most effective way to gather the required data for the prompt template?

A. Select the Account Opportunity object as a resource when creating the prompt template.
B. Create a Flow to retrieve the Opportunity information.
C. Choose the latest Opportunities related list as a merge field in the template.

Correct Answer: B. Create a Flow to retrieve the Opportunity information.

Explanation:

In this scenario, the AI Specialist needs to design a solution that automatically fills the "Latest Opportunities Summary" field on the Account object with data from the three most recently opened Opportunities. To achieve this, accurate data retrieval and transformation are critical to ensure the prompt template works as intended.

Option B is the correct answer. Creating a Flow to retrieve the Opportunity information is the most effective approach. Salesforce Flows provide powerful automation capabilities and can be configured to query the Opportunity object for records linked to the Account. With Flow, the AI Specialist can:

• Retrieve the three most recently opened Opportunities by sorting them based on the last modified or opened date.

• Retrieve the relevant fields for those Opportunities, such as the Opportunity name, stage, value, or any other information required for the summary.

• Pass this data to the prompt template, ensuring that it is dynamically filled with up-to-date information.

Flows allow for complex data retrieval, transformation, and passing that data into AI prompts, which is essential when working with custom fields and dynamic information like recent Opportunities.

Option A, selecting the Account Opportunity object as a resource, is insufficient. While this can link the Account and Opportunity objects, it does not give you the fine-grained control needed to select specific records (like the three most recent Opportunities) and pass them into the prompt template. The object resource is a more generalized approach and doesn't allow the kind of filtering and sorting required for this task.

Option C, selecting the latest Opportunities related list as a merge field, is also not ideal. While merge fields can pull data from related lists, it doesn’t allow for specifying exactly which three Opportunities you want or for ensuring that only the most recently opened records are used. Merge fields are typically used for static relationships rather than dynamic record selection.

In conclusion, Option B (creating a Flow) is the best solution because it allows for precise data selection, filtering, and dynamic integration with the prompt template.

Question No 7:

An AI Specialist is planning to use a Field Generation prompt template to automatically populate a specific field in Salesforce using generative AI. Before proceeding with the creation of the prompt template, the specialist needs to verify a few prerequisites to ensure the field can be enabled for generative AI.

What should the AI Specialist verify before creating the Field Generation prompt to ensure the field is eligible for use with generative AI?

A. Ensure that the Lightning page layout where the field will be displayed has been upgraded to Dynamic Forms.
B. Confirm that the field selected for the generation must be a rich text field with a minimum of 255 characters.
C. Verify that the org is set to API version 59 or higher.

Correct Answer:A. Ensure that the Lightning page layout where the field will be displayed has been upgraded to Dynamic Forms.

Explanation:

To leverage Field Generation with generative AI in Salesforce, certain prerequisites need to be met to ensure smooth integration and functionality. The process of populating fields with AI-generated content involves configuring fields and templates correctly so that data can be automatically inserted and displayed where needed.

The correct answer is Option A: The Lightning page layout where the field will appear must be upgraded to Dynamic Forms. Dynamic Forms allow Salesforce users to create more flexible and dynamic page layouts, providing advanced customization options for field placements and visibility rules. Importantly, Dynamic Forms are required for certain field-based AI features, such as Field Generation, because they provide the structure needed to make fields editable or viewable under specific conditions.

In Salesforce, without Dynamic Forms, page layouts are more rigid, and certain fields or components cannot be dynamically managed, limiting the scope of functionality for generative AI prompts that need to populate fields.

Option B, confirming that the field must be a rich text field with at least 255 characters, is not accurate in this context. Rich text fields are often useful for formatting content (such as bold or italic text), but generative AI prompts can fill standard text fields as well. The requirement for the field type is not necessarily about rich text or length, but rather its ability to hold dynamically generated content, which is not dependent on the 255-character limit.

Option C, verifying the API version, is also not a critical requirement for enabling Field Generation with generative AI. While API version 59 or higher can enable certain features or enhancements, the functionality for Field Generation specifically requires the Dynamic Forms layout configuration, not the API version.

In conclusion, to successfully use Field Generation prompts, the AI Specialist must ensure that the Lightning page layout is upgraded to Dynamic Forms to ensure flexibility and support for AI-driven data population.

Question No 8:

Universal Containers (UC) wants to send personalized emails to its customers based on two key factors: the customer's lifetime value score and their market segment. UC plans to use AI to determine which of the three different email templates should be sent to each customer. Additionally, UC needs the system to explain why a particular email was chosen for each customer.

Which AI model should UC implement to both select the appropriate email and explain the decision-making process behind the selection?

A. Predictive model and generative model
B. Predictive model
C. Generative model

Correct Answer: A. Predictive model and generative model

Explanation:

UC wants to send personalized emails based on the customer’s lifetime value score and market segment. The solution needs to both determine which email to send and also provide an explanation of why that specific email was selected. To accomplish this, UC should implement both a predictive model and a generative model.

Option A is the correct choice because it combines the strengths of both models:

• The predictive model is ideal for classifying and predicting outcomes based on customer data. It can assess the customer’s lifetime value score and market segment to predict the appropriate email that should be sent. The predictive model uses historical data to learn patterns and make predictions about future customer behavior or responses. In this case, it helps determine which of the three email templates should be sent to each customer.

• The generative model comes into play to explain the reasoning behind the email selection. A generative model can be used to generate natural language explanations that describe why a particular email was chosen for a specific customer, based on their score and segment. For example, the system might generate a response like: "We selected this email because your lifetime value score is high, and you belong to the Premium Market Segment."

By using both models together, UC can achieve a robust solution that not only personalizes the email content but also provides transparency and justification for the selection, ensuring that customers understand why they received the particular message.

Option B (predictive model) would help in predicting which email to send based on customer data but lacks the generative AI capabilities necessary to explain why the email was chosen.

Option C (generative model) is focused on creating content but does not inherently have the capability to make predictions based on customer data. It would not be able to make the decision of which email to send based on customer scores and segments alone.

Thus, the most effective approach is to use a combination of both predictive and generative models (Option A).