HP HPE0-V27 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps

Practice Exams:

View All

HPE0-V27 HP Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question No 1:

Your customer has asked for various UEFI BIOS settings to be preconfigured at the Factory in their new servers. How do you submit the request for these changes to HPE?

A. Add the required settings in the Customer Intent Document.
B. Add the required settings in the Order Checklist.
C. Export the configuration to an XML file, open in Word and add the required settings.
D. Export the configuration to an OCA file, open in Word and add the required settings.

Answer: A

Explanation:

When working with HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise) to request specific BIOS or UEFI settings for servers that are preconfigured at the factory, the correct method to submit these requests is via the Customer Intent Document (CID).

The Customer Intent Document (A) is used to specify all configuration requirements for servers, including BIOS settings, hardware configurations, and other customizations. This document is specifically designed for submitting detailed requests for factory-level customizations, such as the UEFI BIOS settings your customer needs. By filling out this document with the required settings, HPE can ensure that the servers are configured according to your specifications before they are shipped to the customer.

Option B (Order Checklist) is not typically used for submitting custom configurations like UEFI BIOS settings. The order checklist usually covers basic hardware configurations and software selections but does not provide a dedicated method for specifying BIOS-level customizations.
Option C (Export the configuration to an XML file, open in Word and add the required settings) is not the correct method. The XML file might be part of a configuration export, but modifying it in Word is not a standard or recommended procedure for submitting configuration requests to HPE.
Option D (Export the configuration to an OCA file, open in Word and add the required settings) is also incorrect. The OCA (Open Configuration Assistant) file may be used internally for server configuration, but like XML files, it is not meant to be manually edited in Word for submission of requests.

Therefore, Option A, adding the required settings in the Customer Intent Document, is the correct approach to submit the BIOS configuration requests to HPE. This ensures that all the specific settings are documented and can be acted upon by HPE during the factory configuration process.

Question No 2:

A customer has significant growth of large, high-priority data-sets in their datacenter. The data is highly sensitive. What solution should be implemented and why?

A. Traditional, as it is the easiest solution to implement and scale for data growth.
B. Cloud, as it is the simplest solution and simplicity is best for security large data-sets.
C. Hybrid solutions, as they are most common in secure, high-priority implementations.
D. Traditional, as it can be completely isolated from potential external threats.

Answer: D

Explanation:

In this scenario, the customer is dealing with high-priority, sensitive data that is growing rapidly. Given the sensitivity of the data, security and control over the data are paramount, and the solution should ensure that the data is kept safe while supporting growth.

Traditional infrastructure (option D) provides the most control over sensitive data by allowing the customer to completely isolate the data from external threats. This isolation can be a critical aspect of security, especially when dealing with highly sensitive data that requires strict compliance with privacy laws and regulations. The traditional model also allows businesses to implement strong physical security measures within their own data centers, such as restricted access, surveillance, and multi-layered physical protections.

The key advantage of traditional systems is that they can be completely air-gapped (i.e., disconnected from the public internet or external networks), which significantly reduces the risk of cyber-attacks or data breaches from external sources. This level of control is particularly important when dealing with data that is classified as high-priority or sensitive.

Now, let's explore why the other options are less suitable:

A. Traditional, as it is the easiest solution to implement and scale for data growth: While traditional infrastructure can offer more control, it is not necessarily the easiest solution to scale, particularly when dealing with rapidly growing data sets. Scaling in a traditional data center can require significant investment in physical hardware, space, and resources, making it potentially less flexible and cost-effective compared to cloud or hybrid solutions.
B. Cloud, as it is the simplest solution and simplicity is best for security large data-sets: The cloud offers scalability and flexibility but can present security concerns when handling highly sensitive data. Cloud environments are managed by third-party providers, which introduces risks related to data sovereignty, access control, and potential vulnerabilities in multi-tenant environments. Even though cloud providers implement robust security measures, data sensitivity may require more granular control and isolation than a cloud solution typically provides.
C. Hybrid solutions, as they are most common in secure, high-priority implementations: Hybrid solutions combine both on-premise and cloud infrastructure, which can offer a balance between control and scalability. However, the hybrid model still introduces complexity in managing security across different environments. While hybrid solutions can provide flexibility, they may not offer the level of control over sensitive data that a traditional infrastructure solution can provide. Also, integrating cloud services with on-premise data centers may expose the data to additional security risks if not carefully managed.

In conclusion, for a customer with highly sensitive, high-priority data that requires full control, security, and isolation, the traditional solution (option D) is the most appropriate choice, as it offers the highest level of data isolation and protection from external threats.

Question No 3:

Which tool can you or your customer use to demonstrate the easy management and integration of a new HPE SimpliVity solution into other HPE management options?

A. HPE SAN Design Reference Guide
B. HPE Demonstration Portal
C. HPE Product Bulletin
D. HPE Assessment Foundry

Answer: B

Explanation:

When presenting a new HPE SimpliVity solution to a potential customer, demonstrating the ease of management and how it integrates with other HPE management tools is crucial. Let’s break down the tools listed and identify the one that best meets this need.

A. HPE SAN Design Reference Guide:
This guide is primarily focused on helping customers design their storage area networks (SANs) and ensuring that storage infrastructure is correctly designed for scalability, performance, and resilience. While useful for storage planning, it does not specifically address management or integration with HPE SimpliVity. Therefore, this is not the best tool for demonstrating the management and integration aspects of HPE SimpliVity.

B. HPE Demonstration Portal:
The HPE Demonstration Portal is an ideal choice for showcasing how HPE solutions, including HPE SimpliVity, can be managed and integrated with other HPE management tools. This portal provides a hands-on demonstration environment where you can show customers the ease of use, manageability, and integration with HPE’s broader management ecosystem (e.g., HPE OneView, HPE InfoSight). By using this portal, you can give the customer a clear and interactive view of how the HPE SimpliVity solution works within the broader HPE management suite, making it the most appropriate option for this scenario.

C. HPE Product Bulletin:
The HPE Product Bulletin typically provides technical details about a product’s features, specifications, and configurations. It is more of an informational resource and does not offer an interactive or visual demonstration of how products like HPE SimpliVity integrate with other management tools. Therefore, it would not be the best tool for showcasing ease of management and integration.

D. HPE Assessment Foundry:
HPE Assessment Foundry is a tool used for evaluating a customer’s IT environment and assessing the best solutions for their needs, particularly in terms of workloads, infrastructure, and performance. While it can help identify the right solutions, it does not focus on the live demonstration of management features or integration, which is the primary goal here.

In conclusion, B. HPE Demonstration Portal is the correct choice because it provides an interactive environment where you can showcase HPE SimpliVity’s management features and its seamless integration with other HPE management tools, effectively addressing the customer’s needs.

Question No 4:

What differentiated business value does HPE GreenLake provide to a customer that a traditional capital outlay purchasing model does not?

A. Eliminate recurring costs
B. Reduce accounts payable balance
C. Improve liquidity
D. Increased overprovisioning

Answer: C

Explanation:

HPE GreenLake offers a consumption-based IT model that brings significant differentiation compared to a traditional capital outlay purchasing model. In this model, customers only pay for the IT resources they use, rather than purchasing hardware and software upfront with a large capital expenditure. This is a key advantage when compared to the traditional model, which requires significant initial investment for purchasing hardware, software, and infrastructure.

Here’s why Improved liquidity (C) is the correct answer:

Improved liquidity: With HPE GreenLake, businesses shift from a large, upfront capital expenditure to a pay-as-you-go model. This means that they are only paying for what they use, and there are no significant upfront costs, which improves cash flow and liquidity. Companies can spread their IT costs over time, paying for services as needed, which allows them to allocate resources more efficiently. Improved liquidity provides businesses with greater financial flexibility, enabling them to respond more effectively to changing market conditions, make more strategic investments, or manage working capital more efficiently.

Now, let’s analyze why the other options are not correct:

A. Eliminate recurring costs: HPE GreenLake does not eliminate recurring costs; instead, it transforms them. Traditional capital expenditure (CapEx) requires a significant upfront payment, whereas HPE GreenLake shifts that to operational expenditure (OpEx), which is still an ongoing cost but spread out and tied directly to usage. The goal is not to eliminate recurring costs, but to make them more predictable and aligned with actual usage.
B. Reduce accounts payable balance: While the pay-per-use model offered by HPE GreenLake can affect how payments are managed, the primary business value it provides isn’t directly linked to reducing the accounts payable balance. The operational expenditure model means businesses pay for what they use, but they still have accounts payable processes. The improvement is more in cash flow management rather than a direct reduction in accounts payable balances.
D. Increased overprovisioning: Overprovisioning is actually a challenge that traditional IT purchasing models often face, as businesses tend to buy more capacity than needed to avoid running out of resources. With HPE GreenLake, overprovisioning is reduced, not increased, because customers only pay for what they use. HPE GreenLake’s pay-as-you-go approach helps to optimize resources and avoid unnecessary overprovisioning by aligning IT resources directly with demand.

In conclusion, HPE GreenLake provides improved liquidity by enabling businesses to shift from large capital expenditures to more manageable, consumption-based costs, allowing for greater financial flexibility and easier adaptation to changing business needs. This is a key differentiator from traditional purchasing models, which often require large, upfront capital investments.

Question No 5:

You need to include non-GreenLake enabled ISVs in a customer solution. With whom should you engage if you need help with this solution?

A. HPE Pointnext advisory services
B. HPE ProLiant product management
C. HPE Pointnext operational services
D. HPE Complete product management

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

When working on a solution that involves non-GreenLake enabled ISVs (Independent Software Vendors), you need a team that can help integrate these ISVs into your customer's environment. Let's break down each option:

Option A: HPE Pointnext advisory services
HPE Pointnext advisory services focus on providing strategic guidance and consultation regarding IT infrastructure, digital transformation, and technology adoption. While they are instrumental in providing high-level consulting, they do not typically handle the integration of third-party ISVs directly into specific solutions. Thus, they are not the most relevant resource when dealing with non-GreenLake ISVs.
Option B: HPE ProLiant product management
HPE ProLiant product management deals with the management and development of ProLiant servers and related technologies. While they could provide insights into hardware compatibility, this team doesn't specialize in the integration of third-party software solutions, especially non-GreenLake ISVs. Therefore, they are not the right team to engage when dealing with ISV integration.
Option C: HPE Pointnext operational services
HPE Pointnext operational services focuses on managing and optimizing IT operations, including support and maintenance of IT environments. While they are essential for ongoing operations, they are not typically involved in the initial stages of integrating non-GreenLake ISVs into a customer solution.
Option D: HPE Complete product management
HPE Complete is a portfolio of solutions that integrate third-party software (including ISVs) into HPE's offerings. HPE Complete product management is the most relevant team when dealing with non-GreenLake enabled ISVs. They work directly with third-party vendors and HPE solutions to ensure that ISVs can be integrated seamlessly into HPE-based solutions. They manage the integration, compatibility, and delivery of these ISV solutions as part of the overall customer solution.

Therefore, the correct answer is Option D: HPE Complete product management, as they specialize in integrating ISVs into HPE solutions, including those that are not GreenLake enabled.

Question No 6:

Your customer would like to add a backup component to the HPE GreenLake solution that you are preparing for them. Their main requirements are cost-optimized backups, long term data retention, and operational simplicity.

What component should you add to their solution?

A. HPE Backup and Recovery Service
B. HPE Cloud Bank Storage
C. Commvault
D. Zerto

Answer: B

Explanation:

Given the customer's requirements for cost-optimized backups, long-term data retention, and operational simplicity, the best option is HPE Cloud Bank Storage. This solution is designed specifically for backup and archiving, offering low-cost storage with long-term retention capabilities. It allows businesses to offload backup data to a secure cloud repository, providing an easy-to-manage, scalable backup solution with operational simplicity, and also supports integration with various backup tools, enabling customers to keep costs down while maintaining a high level of data availability and compliance.

Why other options are less suitable:

A. HPE Backup and Recovery Service: This service offers comprehensive backup and recovery capabilities for workloads and applications but might not focus specifically on long-term retention in the cost-optimized manner that Cloud Bank Storage does. While it is a strong solution for backup and recovery, HPE Cloud Bank Storage is more aligned with the customer’s specific needs for cost-effective long-term retention.
C. Commvault: Commvault is a well-known data protection and management platform that can certainly meet the customer's backup and data retention needs. However, it can be more complex to set up and manage compared to the simpler, more cost-optimized option of HPE Cloud Bank Storage. Commvault offers excellent features but might be more expensive and operationally involved than what the customer desires for simplicity.
D. Zerto: Zerto is primarily designed for disaster recovery and business continuity rather than focused on long-term backup and cost-optimized storage. While it excels in protecting virtualized environments with fast recovery times, it is not as focused on long-term data retention and cost-effective backup solutions as HPE Cloud Bank Storage.

For a solution that offers cost-effective backups, long-term data retention, and ease of management, HPE Cloud Bank Storage is the best option to add to the HPE GreenLake solution. It aligns with the customer's focus on operational simplicity and cost optimization.

Question No 7:

Which components can be part of HPE’s disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure (dHCI)? (Choose three.)

A. HPE B-series switches
B. HPE Alletra 6000 array with FC HBAs
C. HPE ProLiant DX
D. HPE Alletra 6000 array with iSCSI HBAs
E. HPE Aruba switches
F. HPE ProLiant DL

Answer: C, D, and F

Explanation:

HPE's disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure (dHCI) is a flexible, modular approach to hyperconverged infrastructure that decouples compute and storage resources, allowing for independent scaling of each. The components that can be part of dHCI are specifically designed to integrate seamlessly with both compute and storage, supporting the disaggregated model where both can be scaled independently.

Let’s explore the correct options:

C. HPE ProLiant DX
The HPE ProLiant DX is a compute node that is part of HPE’s disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure. It is a key part of the dHCI architecture, providing the computational resources necessary for running applications while being able to scale independently of the storage components. This makes it a core component of dHCI systems, providing flexibility and scalability to match different workload requirements.

D. HPE Alletra 6000 array with iSCSI HBAs
The HPE Alletra 6000 is a storage solution, and in a disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure setup, storage and compute are often separated. The Alletra 6000 array with iSCSI HBAs is designed to handle block-level storage and communicate with compute resources over the network using iSCSI, making it an ideal storage component in dHCI systems. iSCSI HBAs (Host Bus Adapters) are used to establish a network connection between storage and compute, providing the necessary connectivity in disaggregated architectures.

F. HPE ProLiant DL
The HPE ProLiant DL series is another line of compute nodes that can be integrated into dHCI systems. These servers are part of HPE's traditional compute offerings and are capable of running workloads in a disaggregated architecture. Similar to the ProLiant DX, the ProLiant DL series provides the compute power for a dHCI system, while also being able to scale independently of the storage components.

Now, let’s examine the incorrect options:

A. HPE B-series switches
The HPE B-series switches are typically associated with BladeSystem environments, not specifically with disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure (dHCI). While switches are a crucial part of networking in HPE environments, B-series switches are more aligned with blade-based server infrastructure rather than being a direct component of dHCI.

B. HPE Alletra 6000 array with FC HBAs
While the HPE Alletra 6000 array can be part of a storage solution in dHCI, FC HBAs (Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters) are typically used for Fibre Channel connections, which are not the standard in disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure. In dHCI, network-based protocols like iSCSI or NVMe over Fabrics are more commonly used for storage connectivity, making FC HBAs less likely to be a key component.

E. HPE Aruba switches
HPE Aruba switches are part of HPE's networking portfolio, but in the context of disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure (dHCI), Aruba switches are not typically the direct components that define the storage or compute elements. Aruba switches may be used in the overall network infrastructure, but they are not core components of the disaggregated compute-storage model.

In conclusion, the correct components that can be part of HPE’s disaggregated hyperconverged infrastructure are C. HPE ProLiant DX, D. HPE Alletra 6000 array with iSCSI HBAs, and F. HPE ProLiant DL. These components allow for a scalable and flexible infrastructure where compute and storage resources are independently managed and expanded.

Question No 8:

Compared to OCA, which additional datacenter characteristic is required to configure a solution in SSET?

A. KW per rack
B. Country
C. Input voltage
D. Input phase

Answer: B

Explanation:

In the context of configuring solutions for datacenters, OCA (Optimal Configuration Assistant) and SSET (Site Selection and Evaluation Tool) are tools used to configure and evaluate data center setups for specific needs.

OCA (Optimal Configuration Assistant) typically helps in configuring solutions based on power requirements, cooling, and other parameters but might not need detailed geographical information about the datacenter's location.
SSET (Site Selection and Evaluation Tool), on the other hand, is a more comprehensive tool that considers a broader set of factors when configuring solutions, including the country in which the datacenter is located. The country is important because it helps determine compliance with local regulations, available resources, infrastructure considerations (like power grid characteristics), and regional best practices.

Comparing the two tools, the key difference is that SSET requires the country as an additional characteristic. This is because the country impacts several logistical and regulatory aspects, such as:

Regulatory requirements: Different countries have specific regulations on power usage, security, and data protection that must be taken into account when configuring datacenter solutions.
Local infrastructure: The availability and reliability of power and other resources may vary depending on the country.
Geographical considerations: Location-specific factors like climate, political stability, and environmental factors can influence the configuration process.

The other options, such as KW per rack (A), input voltage (C), and input phase (D), are typically needed for power configurations and infrastructure planning but are already considered in both OCA and SSET for evaluating hardware needs. Therefore, these parameters are not unique to SSET as compared to OCA.

Thus, the additional characteristic required by SSET compared to OCA is the country.

Question No 9:

Your client needs a departmental Storage array to host a VDI workload at a remote office. The networking infrastructure is limited and the client has decided to connect the ESXi host servers with 12Gbps SAS.

Which HPE Storage product will meet their requirements?

A. HPE Alletra 9060
B. HPE Nimble AF20
C. HPE MSA 2062
D. HPE Alletra 6030

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

To determine which HPE Storage product best meets the client's requirements, we need to analyze the key factors involved:

Client needs a departmental storage array: This indicates that the storage solution should be scalable for departmental use, offering a balance between cost and performance.
VDI workload: Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) typically requires good performance in terms of IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) and low latency due to multiple virtual desktops being run on shared infrastructure.
12Gbps SAS connectivity: This specifies the type of interface for connecting the storage array to the ESXi host servers. 12Gbps SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) is a high-performance, reliable interface commonly used in environments requiring fast data access.

Let’s evaluate the options based on these requirements:

A. HPE Alletra 9060: This is a high-performance storage array designed for large-scale, mission-critical workloads and enterprise environments. While it is excellent for larger enterprises and complex workloads, it may be overkill for a departmental use case, especially in a remote office scenario where cost and simpler deployment might be more important. The Alletra 9060 may also be more expensive and have more capabilities than what is needed for the VDI workload in this context.
B. HPE Nimble AF20: The Nimble AF20 is an all-flash storage array designed for workloads needing high performance, low latency, and high availability. While it is a good choice for many use cases, including VDI, it uses iSCSI or FC for connectivity, not 12Gbps SAS, which does not meet the client’s specific requirement for using 12Gbps SAS to connect the servers. Hence, this product is not the right fit.
C. HPE MSA 2062: The HPE MSA 2062 is a departmental-level storage array that supports 12Gbps SAS and is designed for small to medium-sized workloads, such as VDI. It offers excellent performance, reliability, and scalability at a cost-effective price point. The MSA 2062 is a perfect match for the client's requirement for a 12Gbps SAS connection and departmental-scale VDI workload, offering the right balance between performance and price. The MSA 2062 is also easy to deploy and manage, which is crucial in remote office setups.
D. HPE Alletra 6030: Similar to the Alletra 9060, the Alletra 6030 is part of HPE's more advanced storage solutions, designed for medium to large-scale enterprise environments. While it offers excellent performance and scalability, it may not be the best fit for the specific need of departmental VDI workloads in a remote office. The Alletra 6030 may also come with a higher price point and complexity than the MSA 2062, making it less ideal for this use case.

In conclusion, C (HPE MSA 2062) is the correct answer because it directly meets the client’s requirements for a departmental storage array, supports 12Gbps SAS connectivity, and is well-suited for hosting VDI workloads at a remote office. It strikes the right balance between performance, cost, and ease of deployment for this specific scenario.

Question No 10:

Your customer needs a petabyte scale, geo-dispersed object Storage Platform. Which Alliance solution will meet their requirement?

A. HPE Solutions for Scality ARTESCA
B. HPE Solutions for Qumulo
C. HPE Solutions for Scality RING
D. HPE Solutions for Cohesity

Correct answer: C

Explanation:

When considering a petabyte-scale, geo-dispersed object storage platform, the solution needs to be able to scale efficiently, distribute data across different locations, and handle large amounts of unstructured data typically in the form of objects.

Let’s break down each of the options:

A (HPE Solutions for Scality ARTESCA): Scality ARTESCA is a modern object storage solution designed for hybrid cloud environments. While it is a scalable object storage system, it is typically optimized for smaller deployments and more limited use cases, particularly for organizations looking for cloud-native object storage. While ARTESCA can handle scale, it is not typically designed for petabyte-scale, geo-dispersed environments. Therefore, A is not the best fit for this particular requirement.
B (HPE Solutions for Qumulo): Qumulo is a file storage platform designed for managing large-scale data and unstructured workloads. While Qumulo excels at file storage and scale, it is not a dedicated object storage solution, which makes it less suited for a "geo-dispersed object storage platform" as required in this scenario. Therefore, B is also not the best fit.
C (HPE Solutions for Scality RING): Scality RING is a robust, scalable object storage solution designed to handle petabyte-scale data in geo-dispersed environments. Scality RING is specifically built for high availability and scalability, supporting massive data sets and geo-replication across multiple locations, making it an ideal choice for this requirement. It provides the reliability and scalability needed for enterprise-grade object storage at a petabyte scale. C is the correct choice.
D (HPE Solutions for Cohesity): Cohesity is a data management solution designed primarily for backup, recovery, and data consolidation, rather than large-scale object storage. While it can handle significant amounts of data, it does not specialize in geo-dispersed, petabyte-scale object storage in the same way Scality RING does. Cohesity is more appropriate for backup and file data management. Therefore, D is not the best fit.

In conclusion, C (HPE Solutions for Scality RING) is the best fit for a petabyte-scale, geo-dispersed object storage platform, as it is designed specifically for massive scale and geo-replication, meeting the customer's requirement.