Microsoft PL-600 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps

Practice Exams:

View All

PL-600 Microsoft Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question No 1:

A company uses two separate unlinked apps to manage sales leads; a Power Apps app and a third-party application. The client has the following requirements:

Manage all leads by using the Power Apps app.
Create a lead in the Power Apps app when a user creates a lead in the third-party application.
Update leads in the Power Apps app when a user updates a lead in the third-party application.
Connect to the third-party application by using an API.

Which three options can you use to achieve the goal? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

A. Dual-write
B. Custom connector
C. Dataflow
D. Power Automate cloud flow
E. Dataverse connector

Answer: B, D, E

Explanation:

To meet the client’s requirements, we need to enable seamless integration between the Power Apps app and the third-party application, especially when dealing with lead creation and updating leads. Let's look at the options:

A. Dual-write
Dual-write is used for integrating and synchronizing data between Dataverse and Dynamics 365 applications, such as Sales and Customer Service. However, it does not apply to integrating a third-party application and a Power Apps app unless the third-party application is also integrated with Dynamics 365. In this case, it does not seem relevant because the integration is with a third-party app, not a Dynamics 365 app. Hence, A is not correct.
B. Custom connector
A Custom connector allows you to connect to external services that are not natively available as a prebuilt connector in Power Apps. Since the third-party application uses an API, you can build a Custom connector to connect to the third-party application and pull or push the necessary lead data. This will allow you to create and update leads in the Power Apps app based on the actions in the third-party application. Therefore, B is a correct option.
C. Dataflow
Dataflows are primarily used for importing, transforming, and preparing data from different sources to load into Dataverse or other databases. While dataflows can be used to move data, they are not the ideal choice for real-time synchronization (which is required for creating and updating leads). Therefore, C is not the best choice in this scenario.
D. Power Automate cloud flow
Power Automate cloud flow enables you to create workflows that can automate processes across apps and services. You can set up a flow to monitor the third-party app for new leads or updates to leads, and then trigger actions in the Power Apps app to create or update leads based on the changes detected in the third-party app. This fits the client’s requirements perfectly. Therefore, D is a correct option.
E. Dataverse connector
The Dataverse connector allows you to connect to Dataverse from Power Apps, which would be used to store the sales leads. If the Power Apps app is using Dataverse to store lead information, the Dataverse connector will allow seamless integration for both creating and updating leads. Using this connector will facilitate the interaction between the Power Apps app and the third-party application. Therefore, E is a correct option.

Conclusion: The best strategies to achieve the goal of integrating the Power Apps app with the third-party application are:

B. Custom connector to connect with the third-party app via its API.
D. Power Automate cloud flow to automate the process of creating and updating leads between the systems.
E. Dataverse connector to manage lead data within Dataverse, if the Power Apps app is using it to store the information.

Question No 2:

A large company experiences high staff turnover rates. As a result, the company must add or remove multiple system user accounts daily. You need to recommend a security concept which will facilitate complex security profiles to entities for large groups of users across the Power Apps and Dynamics 365 applications. What should you recommend?

A. Hierarchy security
B. Field-level security
C. User access management
D. Team privileges

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

In the context of Power Apps and Dynamics 365, Team privileges provide a robust way to manage and scale security profiles for large groups of users. Given the scenario where a company experiences high staff turnover and needs to frequently add or remove user accounts, this concept is particularly valuable for simplifying security management.

Why D. Team privileges is the correct answer:

Team privileges allow an administrator to group users into teams, each with a set of predefined roles and security permissions. When user accounts are added or removed, they can be easily assigned or removed from teams, which means security profiles (roles, access levels) for multiple users can be managed at once. This greatly simplifies user management, especially when there's a need to adjust security settings for large groups of employees frequently. The roles and permissions defined for the team automatically apply to the users within that team, making it efficient for dynamic organizations like the one described.

For example, if a new batch of users is hired in a specific department, they can be added to a team with the appropriate privileges, and similarly, when employees leave, they can be removed from the team, ensuring security profiles are managed correctly and consistently.

Let's review the other options:

A. Hierarchy security – While hierarchy security in Dynamics 365 is useful for organizations with structured leadership models (e.g., managers having higher levels of access to data of their subordinates), it doesn't scale as effectively when frequently adding or removing users. This model is better suited for cases where the relationship between roles is well-defined, not necessarily for handling daily changes in a high-turnover environment.

B. Field-level security – Field-level security refers to controlling access to specific fields within entities (such as hiding sensitive data from certain users). While it’s valuable for controlling access to particular data within records, it doesn’t address the need to scale and manage large user groups or simplify the process of frequently adding/removing users. It focuses more on data granularity rather than group-level security profiles.

C. User access management – This is a broad term that refers to the overall practice of managing who can access what resources within a system. However, in the context of Dynamics 365 and Power Apps, team-based security provides a more efficient way to manage user roles and permissions for large groups, rather than individually managing user access. User access management by itself does not inherently offer a scalable way to manage complex security profiles across multiple users.

In summary, Team privileges provide a streamlined and scalable approach for handling complex security profiles for large groups of users, which is ideal for a company with high staff turnover rates. This security model enables the company to quickly assign or remove users from teams with predefined roles, facilitating efficient and consistent management of user access across Power Apps and Dynamics 365.

Question No 3:

You are designing a Power Platform solution. The company wants its development team to adopt the construction of repeatable components for its implementation team to reuse on different entities and forms. You need to recommend a technology that meets these requirements.

Which technology would you recommend the developers adopt to assist the implementation team?

A. JavaScript
B. Power Apps Component Framework control
C. Web resource
D. Canvas app

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

When designing a Power Platform solution that requires the construction of repeatable components that can be reused across different entities and forms, the most suitable technology is the Power Apps Component Framework (PCF) control. Let's examine why:

A. JavaScript
While JavaScript can be used to enhance and customize forms, it doesn't provide a standardized, reusable framework for building controls or components that can be easily shared across different implementations. JavaScript is typically used for scripting purposes on specific forms or entities and is not inherently designed for the creation of repeatable, modular components.

B. Power Apps Component Framework control
The Power Apps Component Framework (PCF) is the most suitable technology for creating reusable, repeatable components that can be used across multiple entities and forms in Power Apps. PCF controls allow developers to create custom components with more complex functionality than can be achieved using simple web resources or JavaScript. These controls are reusable and can be deployed across multiple forms, entities, and applications. This makes it the best option for creating components that the implementation team can leverage multiple times in different scenarios.

C. Web resource
A web resource is a way to store static content (like HTML, JavaScript, CSS, or images) in the Power Platform environment, and while web resources are useful for embedding custom scripts or HTML, they do not offer the same level of modularity and reusability as PCF controls. They are more appropriate for smaller, one-off customizations, not for building large reusable components.

D. Canvas app
A Canvas app is a type of app built on the Power Apps platform that allows for highly customized interfaces using a drag-and-drop approach. However, while canvas apps are great for building custom applications, they are not typically used for creating components that can be reused on forms and entities across a broader implementation. Canvas apps are generally standalone and not intended for embedding into other solutions as reusable components.

Conclusion:
For building repeatable, reusable components that can be easily used across different entities and forms, Power Apps Component Framework controls (PCF) are the ideal solution. They are designed to create custom controls that can be shared across different environments and leveraged by implementation teams, making them the best choice for this scenario.

Question No 4:

Which three components should you recommend to meet the company's requirements for improving productivity through Power Platform?

A. Dynamics 365 Virtual Agents chatbots
B. Customer self-service portal
C. Dynamics 365 Field Service
D. Business process flows
E. Omnichannel for Customer Service

Answer: A, B, E

Explanation:

To meet the company's requirements for improving productivity and enabling better customer interactions, the following Power Platform components should be used:

Dynamics 365 Virtual Agents chatbots (A):

Dynamics 365 Virtual Agents enables the creation of intelligent chatbots that can handle customer queries automatically. These chatbots can be integrated into the company's online portal, providing an easy way for customers to engage in conversations without waiting for a human representative.
Chatbots can handle initial interactions, direct customers to the right resources, and even escalate more complex issues to a customer service representative. This would directly address the requirement for providing customers with a chat service.

Customer self-service portal (B):

A Customer Self-Service Portal enables customers to submit and track their own cases, providing an online platform to interact with the company without needing to call or email customer support. This feature directly addresses the company's goal of providing customers with a portal where they can submit and review cases.
Self-service portals often integrate with Dynamics 365, making it easier to manage customer interactions and provide a centralized location for case tracking.

Omnichannel for Customer Service (E):

Omnichannel for Customer Service enables the routing of customer inquiries across multiple channels (including chat, email, and phone) and allows you to route chats to customer service representatives based on skill and availability.It integrates directly with Dynamics 365 Customer Service, providing routing, queuing, and escalation features to ensure that customers are connected with the right person at the right time. This meets the requirement to ensure that chats are routed to the right customer service representative based on skill and availability.

Why the other options are not recommended:

C. Dynamics 365 Field Service is primarily designed to manage field service operations, such as scheduling and dispatching technicians for on-site visits. It is not a suitable option for managing online customer interactions or chat services.
D. Business process flows are used to guide users through stages in a process (e.g., case management). While they can be helpful for structured workflows, they are not the primary tool for providing an online portal or routing chat interactions, which are the main requirements here.

Conclusion: To meet the company’s goals of providing a customer self-service portal, enabling live chat, and routing chats based on skill and availability, the best solution would be a combination of Dynamics 365 Virtual Agents chatbots, a Customer self-service portal, and Omnichannel for Customer Service.

Question No 5:

A client uses Dynamics 365 Sales, Power BI datasets, and Power BI dataflows. The Dynamics 365 Sales implementation has security roles that restrict data export. You need to ensure that data has the same restrictions in Power BI as it does in Dynamics 365 Sales. You need to design the security to avoid sensitive data from being seen.

Which two actions should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

A. Use Microsoft Dataverse restrictions before setting up the Power BI reports.
B. Limit the role in Dynamics 365 Sales to only data allowed so it cannot be exported to Microsoft Excel.
C. Limit the role and ensure that exporting to Microsoft Excel is not allowed in both Dynamics 365 Sales and Power BI.
D. Share Power BI dashboards only with users who are supported to see this data.

Correct answers: A and C

Explanation:

In this case, ensuring that sensitive data from Dynamics 365 Sales is appropriately restricted in Power BI is critical. Let’s look at each option:

Option A: "Use Microsoft Dataverse restrictions before setting up the Power BI reports."

This is correct. Microsoft Dataverse is the underlying data platform for Dynamics 365 and Power BI, and it supports security features to control access to data. By using Dataverse security restrictions, you can ensure that the data pulled into Power BI is filtered based on the same security roles and permissions defined in Dynamics 365 Sales. This means users who have restricted access to certain data in Dynamics 365 Sales will also have restricted access in Power BI, ensuring the security of sensitive data is consistent across platforms.

Option B: "Limit the role in Dynamics 365 Sales to only data allowed so it cannot be exported to Microsoft Excel."

This is incorrect. While limiting the role in Dynamics 365 Sales to allow only specific data is a good practice, it doesn’t directly address the issue of ensuring data security in Power BI. The challenge here is about ensuring the same level of data restrictions in both Dynamics 365 Sales and Power BI. Restricting export capabilities to Excel in Dynamics 365 is helpful for preventing manual data export, but it does not ensure that the same data security rules are applied once data is pulled into Power BI.

Option C: "Limit the role and ensure that exporting to Microsoft Excel is not allowed in both Dynamics 365 Sales and Power BI."

This is correct. Limiting export functionality both in Dynamics 365 Sales and Power BI ensures that users cannot download sensitive data into an unprotected format (like Excel). This is a critical security control. While this doesn’t directly enforce the same role-based security between the two platforms, it prevents unauthorized access to the data once it’s in Power BI, as users would be unable to extract or export data in unregulated ways.

Option D: "Share Power BI dashboards only with users who are supported to see this data."

This is partially correct but does not fully address the security problem. Sharing Power BI dashboards only with authorized users is a useful approach to limit access to the reports. However, it doesn't address the underlying problem of data security in Power BI itself. The recommendation to apply Dataverse restrictions and limit export capabilities ensures the data remains protected, even for those who may have access to the Power BI reports. This should be complemented by restricting sharing of dashboards, but it is not sufficient on its own.

Conclusion:

The two correct recommendations are:

A: Using Microsoft Dataverse restrictions to enforce data security.
C: Limiting export functionality to protect data from unauthorized access once it's in Power BI.

These actions ensure that data security in Dynamics 365 Sales is respected in Power BI, both by controlling access and restricting the ability to export sensitive data.

Question No 6:

You are a Power Platform consultant for an internet support company. The company lacks a budget to buy third-party ISVs or add-ons. The company requires a new system that achieves the following:

All support issues must come in by email, need to be logged, and assigned to the support group.
Accounts must synchronize with the parent company Oracle database.
Reports must be sent to the executives on a weekly basis.
No custom code will be used in the system.

Which two components should you recommend? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

A. Power Virtual Agents
B. Microsoft Dataverse
C. Server-side synchronization
D. Microsoft Customer Voice

Answer: B, C

Explanation:

Let's evaluate each component based on the company's requirements:

A. Power Virtual Agents
Power Virtual Agents is a tool for building chatbots, which could automate interactions with customers or users. However, in this scenario, there is no mention of needing a chatbot for customer support or interaction, so A is not the best choice. The company requires a system to log support issues, synchronize accounts, and generate reports, none of which directly involve a virtual agent or chatbot.
B. Microsoft Dataverse
Microsoft Dataverse is the foundational data platform for the Microsoft Power Platform. It is the data backbone for storing information such as support issues, account details, and other related entities. Dataverse is ideal for storing and managing support issues in this scenario and ensuring data consistency across different systems. Additionally, it enables the integration of data from external sources like the Oracle database, which is required to synchronize accounts with the parent company. Therefore, B is a correct choice.
C. Server-side synchronization
Server-side synchronization is a feature that allows for the synchronization of email, calendar, and contact data between Microsoft Dataverse (Dynamics 365) and external systems such as an email server or a third-party database like Oracle. It is useful for automating the logging of support issues received via email and assigning them to the support group. This feature ensures that incoming support issues via email are properly captured and logged into the system without manual intervention. Therefore, C is also a correct choice.
D. Microsoft Customer Voice
Microsoft Customer Voice is primarily used to gather feedback from customers through surveys. It’s not suited for logging support issues, synchronizing accounts with an Oracle database, or automating report generation. Since the company's focus is on support issue management and account synchronization, D is not relevant for this solution.

Conclusion: The best components for this solution are:

B. Microsoft Dataverse for managing the data (support issues and account synchronization).
C. Server-side synchronization to automate the process of logging support issues via email and synchronize accounts with the Oracle database.