• Home
• PMI Exams
• PMP - Project Management Professional

PMP PMI Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question No 1: 

A project manager is overseeing a software development project that is being executed in a hybrid environment, combining both agile and traditional project management methodologies. During the planning phase of the project, the project manager proactively identified several risks, one of which was the potential unavailability of a key technical resource required for a task on the project's critical path. This risk was documented in the project's risk register along with a response strategy.

Now, just one week before this technical resource is needed, the assigned engineer notifies the project manager of a personal emergency and takes an unexpected leave of absence. This situation directly impacts the critical path and could delay the overall project timeline. The project manager must respond appropriately to keep the project on track and manage the risk that has now become an issue.

What should the project manager do next?

A. Consult the risk register for an appropriate planned risk response and implement it.
B. Revise the project management plan and reschedule the task based on resource availability.
C. Reassess the business requirements with stakeholders and remove the task from the project scope.
D. Update the lessons learned and the risk log to note that the risk has occurred.

Correct Answer: A. Consult the risk register for an appropriate planned risk response and implement it.

Explanation:

The correct course of action in this situation is for the project manager to refer to the project’s risk register and implement the pre-defined response strategy. This aligns with standard risk management practices outlined in the PMBOK® Guide and other project management frameworks.

During the planning phase, the project manager had already anticipated this risk and proactively documented it, which suggests that an appropriate mitigation or contingency plan should be in place. Since the risk has now materialized and become an actual issue, the project manager should act according to the response strategy already defined, ensuring a timely and structured reaction.

Choosing this option ensures that the project manager uses established procedures rather than making unplanned changes. It allows for continuity and minimizes disruption by relying on previously agreed-upon solutions. For instance, the response plan might include assigning a backup technical resource, outsourcing the task temporarily, or rearranging non-critical tasks to allow more time for the original resource to return.

Options B and C are reactive and may disrupt the project scope or schedule unnecessarily. B might lead to rescheduling key deliverables, which could jeopardize deadlines, while C implies removing a task, which is not advisable without stakeholder approval and re-analysis of the scope. Option D is about documenting what happened, which is important but comes after responding to the issue.

Thus, the most effective and professional response is to follow the planned course of action as recorded in the risk register, demonstrating good foresight, preparedness, and control over project uncertainties.

Question No 2: 

A newly formed team has recently transitioned to using an agile methodology to manage their software development project. As the team begins adopting agile practices, they hold daily stand-up meetings to discuss progress and obstacles. During several stand-ups, team members raise concerns about frequent task delays and lack of clarity regarding feature requirements.

In response, the project leader collaborates with the product owner to gain more clarity on the product features. Instead of addressing the root causes of the delays, the project leader instructs the team to fast-track all product features in order to meet delivery deadlines. As a result, although the team is completing sprints, they are delivering either fewer features than expected or features with compromised quality.

This trend raises concerns about sustainable development and long-term project success.

What should the project leader have done to ensure the team’s success?

A. Asked the team to create an impediment log and keep it updated for use in the next sprint planning
B. Directed teams to possible solutions that help in removing the impediments and contribute to a timely delivery
C. Suggested to the team to add impediments as work items in the product backlog to be fixed in the next sprints
D. Empowered the team to improve their processes, tools, and interactions to be more effective in delivery and removing impediments

Correct Answer: D. Empowered the team to improve their processes, tools, and interactions to be more effective in delivery and removing impediments

Explanation:

In agile environments, especially in newly formed teams, empowering the team to reflect on and improve their own processes is a key principle. Agile encourages self-organization, continuous improvement, and adaptive planning. Rather than dictating rushed delivery, the project leader should have focused on enabling the team to identify root causes and find long-term solutions.

The correct answer is D, which aligns with the agile manifesto's principle of promoting sustainable development through motivated individuals and empowering teams to inspect and adapt. When teams have autonomy to refine their tools, workflows, and communication methods, they become more capable of resolving impediments, increasing velocity, and maintaining quality over time.

By contrast, the project leader’s decision to fast-track delivery may have temporarily pushed progress, but it undermined quality and team morale. It also ignored the principle of delivering a working product at the end of each sprint. Empowerment, rather than pressure, is key to high performance in agile teams.

Option A (creating an impediment log) is useful, but by itself does not solve the problem—it’s a tracking mechanism, not a solution. Option B suggests directing the team to solutions, which contradicts agile values that promote team-led problem-solving. Option C—adding impediments as backlog items—is more of a workaround than a fix.

Therefore, empowering the team to continuously improve is the most sustainable and agile-aligned solution, ensuring long-term delivery success without compromising quality.

Question No 3: 

A project team is working in an Agile environment and is successfully delivering incremental features at the end of each iteration. As per the Agile process, the customer is invited to review the deliverables after each iteration during the iteration review meeting. However, the customer is frequently unavailable for these reviews, causing delays in feedback. As a result, the team often proceeds without timely input, leading to rework and inefficiencies. This recurring issue is affecting productivity and the quality of deliverables.

As the project manager, what is the most effective course of action to ensure timely feedback and reduce rework?

A. Integrate the customer into daily stand-ups and other ongoing activities to obtain continuous guidance.
B. Proactively coordinate with the customer and agree on a structured review process that accommodates their availability.
C. Ask the customer to provide complete and finalized requirements at the beginning of each iteration.
D. Allow the customer to review the work based on their availability, even if it means delaying the review.

Correct Answer:

B. Proactively coordinate with the customer and agree on a structured review process that accommodates their availability.

Explanation:

In Agile project management, continuous customer collaboration and timely feedback are essential to ensure the product evolves in alignment with business needs. Iteration or sprint reviews are key touchpoints where the customer inspects the increment and provides input for the next steps. When these reviews are delayed, it disrupts the Agile feedback loop, resulting in misaligned work, rework, and reduced team efficiency.

Option B—"Proactively coordinate with the customer and agree on a structured review process that accommodates their availability"—is the best approach. It recognizes the root of the problem (the customer's availability) and suggests a practical, forward-looking solution. By planning ahead and establishing a predictable review schedule that works for the customer, the team can secure timely feedback and maintain an effective delivery cadence. This also promotes accountability and ensures that customer input is incorporated without bottlenecks.

Option A might seem collaborative, but including the customer in daily activities may not be realistic or efficient, especially if the customer has limited availability. Option C contradicts Agile principles, which embrace change and continuous refinement rather than expecting complete requirements upfront. Option D accepts the problem without solving it—it perpetuates delays and does not address the impact on the team's workflow.

By adopting a proactive and structured review process, the project manager upholds Agile values while minimizing disruption, reducing rework, and ensuring that customer feedback remains integral to the development process.

Question No 4:

A project manager is leading a team tasked with implementing several critical features in a legacy application to comply with a newly introduced regulation. The project timeline is very tight, with only six weeks until the deadline. During a daily stand-up meeting, a software engineer highlights that work on a crucial feature has been halted, pending a task assigned to a designer. This delay poses a serious risk to the project's on-time completion.

What is the most effective course of action for the project manager to take to address this bottleneck and ensure timely delivery?

A. Escalate the issue by meeting with the design team manager to request an additional designer
B. Instruct the software engineer to proceed without waiting for the critical feature
C. Request the design team manager to reassess and adjust their task priorities
D. Collaborate directly with the designer to understand the delay and find a mutually agreeable solution

Correct Answer: D. Collaborate directly with the designer to understand the delay and find a mutually agreeable solution

Explanation:

In time-sensitive projects, addressing bottlenecks quickly and efficiently is crucial to staying on schedule. When a critical feature's development is blocked due to a pending design task, the project manager must act decisively. While escalation or reprioritization (choices A and C) may eventually help, they add layers of communication and potential delay. Asking the engineer to proceed without a vital feature (choice B) risks delivering an incomplete or non-compliant product, which is unacceptable when regulatory compliance is involved.

The best course of action is Option D — directly engaging with the designer. This promotes real-time problem solving, builds collaboration, and allows for immediate identification of root causes or misunderstandings. It also opens up opportunities to brainstorm feasible workarounds, adjust dependencies, or redistribute workload internally. Direct communication fosters ownership and trust, while also helping the project manager assess whether the delay is a one-time issue or a systemic risk that may require further intervention later.

This approach is also aligned with agile principles, where impediments are handled collaboratively and swiftly to minimize disruption. By working with the designer directly, the project manager can also better inform any necessary escalations or adjustments with more accurate information.

Ultimately, project success depends on the ability to navigate unexpected blockers without losing momentum, and immediate engagement with stakeholders closest to the problem is often the fastest and most effective path to resolution.

Question No 5:

A project manager is initiating a new project in collaboration with a customer’s team. Although the customer wants to begin immediately due to a regulatory delivery deadline, several key product requirements remain undefined. To manage this uncertainty and time constraint, the project manager opts to use a hybrid project management approach instead of a fully predictive or agile methodology.

Why is a hybrid approach the most suitable choice for this project?

A. A hybrid approach allows the team to begin work immediately while requirements are still being defined
B. A hybrid approach gives the project manager flexibility to rewrite the product specifications later
C. A hybrid approach manages both the undefined requirements and the fixed delivery date effectively
D. A hybrid approach ensures the regulatory delivery date is met by removing uncertainty in the requirements

Correct Answer: C. A hybrid approach manages both the undefined requirements and the fixed delivery date effectively

Explanation:

A hybrid project management approach combines elements of both predictive (waterfall) and adaptive (agile) methodologies. It is especially beneficial in projects where some aspects are well-defined and time-sensitive, while others remain fluid and require iterative development.

In this scenario, the customer demands that work begin immediately due to a fixed regulatory deadline. At the same time, many product requirements are still vague. A traditional waterfall approach wouldn’t allow the project to start until all requirements are defined, delaying progress. On the other hand, a purely agile approach may not offer the necessary control to meet a non-negotiable delivery date tied to compliance.

The project manager correctly selects a hybrid approach (Option C) because it provides structure for time-critical components (such as compliance deliverables) using predictive methods, while allowing flexibility to refine undefined requirements iteratively using agile techniques. This dual-track model ensures progress isn’t stalled while still adapting to evolving product definitions.

Options A and B partially address these advantages but don’t fully capture the essence of balancing flexibility with predictability. Option D is incorrect because no methodology can entirely "eliminate" uncertainty; it can only manage it effectively.

In regulated environments, time constraints are rigid, but customer inputs may evolve. A hybrid model enables phased execution — early phases can focus on non-dependent tasks and known deliverables, while later stages accommodate ongoing discovery. This helps mitigate risk and improves stakeholder satisfaction through ongoing feedback loops.

Ultimately, the hybrid method provides the right balance of control and agility, making it ideal for projects facing both evolving requirements and strict deadlines.

Question No 6:

A project manager is overseeing a team in which all members are located within the same time zone. However, some remote team members are reportedly having difficulties collaborating effectively with the rest of the team. This has raised concerns among the project team. Despite being in the same geographic time zone, these remote members are less engaged in collaborative activities, and the project manager is uncertain about the root cause. They suspect that the issue might not be related to time differences but possibly to other overlooked elements of remote collaboration.

As the project manager attempts to resolve this issue and improve team cohesion, what should be the next appropriate step?

A. Implement new options
B. Examine the team's virtual needs
C. Rectify ground rule violations
D. Review performance formally

Correct Answer: B. Examine the team's virtual needs

Explanation:

In today’s increasingly virtual work environment, even teams located in the same time zone can face challenges in collaboration due to factors unrelated to geography—such as communication tools, collaboration platforms, team norms, or digital fatigue. In this scenario, although the team shares a time zone, certain remote members still experience barriers in engaging with the rest of the group. This points to possible inadequacies in the virtual team infrastructure or unclear expectations regarding virtual collaboration.

The project manager’s best course of action is to examine the team’s virtual needs. This involves assessing whether the tools being used (e.g., video conferencing, messaging platforms, file-sharing systems) are sufficient and user-friendly. It may also include evaluating whether team norms for availability, responsiveness, and engagement in virtual meetings are clear and inclusive. Psychological safety and inclusivity in virtual environments can also play a role.

Simply implementing new options (Choice A) without understanding the root cause might not solve the problem and could waste time or resources. Rectifying ground rule violations (Choice C) is premature unless it is established that rules were broken. Reviewing performance formally (Choice D) addresses individual accountability but misses the broader collaboration issue.

By understanding and addressing the team’s virtual needs, the project manager can create a more effective and inclusive virtual environment that promotes collaboration, even among remote members. This proactive approach fosters team cohesion and enhances overall project performance.

Question No 7:

A global organization is executing a project with team members distributed across various countries and time zones. While each team member is meeting their individual performance expectations, the overall team performance is lagging, particularly when it comes to group collaboration and shared tasks. Coordination is lacking, and there is a noticeable drop in team synergy.

To improve team effectiveness and cohesion, what action should the project manager take?

A. Review and reassign team assignments
B. Facilitate communication and team building
C. Negotiate for new team members
D. Review and update the communications management plan

Correct Answer: B. Facilitate communication and team building

Explanation:

When teams are distributed across different geographic regions and time zones, ensuring effective communication and team cohesion becomes a major challenge. In this case, while individuals are performing well, the collective performance is low—this indicates that the issue lies in the team dynamic and collaboration, not in individual competencies.

The best approach for the project manager is to facilitate communication and team building. This involves creating opportunities for the team to interact beyond just task completion—through virtual team-building activities, regular video calls, collaborative platforms, and perhaps synchronized working hours or overlapping time blocks. Improving trust, rapport, and mutual understanding can significantly enhance collaboration and team performance.

Reassigning team roles (Option A) may only redistribute the problem without resolving the core issue of team cohesion. Negotiating for new team members (Option C) is drastic and unjustified when the current team members are individually capable. Updating the communications management plan (Option D) is a strategic step, but it focuses on communication logistics rather than team dynamics, and doesn’t directly address the human aspect of collaboration.

Therefore, Option B is the most effective and people-centered solution. By strengthening team interaction and mutual trust, the project manager can improve performance in group activities and overall project outcomes.

Question No 8:

During the third iteration of an agile project, the product owner introduces another critical feature that they insist must be added. This has occurred in the two previous iterations as well, resulting in missed sprint goals and growing frustration among the development team. The team is concerned about scope creep and the negative impact on morale and delivery timelines.

What is the most appropriate step the project manager should take in this situation?

A. Request the scrum team to prioritize the product backlog
B. Ask the product owner to prioritize the backlog with the project team
C. Call for an internal meeting to discuss the changes and their value
D. Incorporate the changes in the last sprint before the first release

Correct Answer: B. Ask the product owner to prioritize the backlog with the project team

Explanation:

In agile frameworks like Scrum, the product backlog is a living document that should be continuously refined and prioritized based on value and urgency. The product owner (PO) holds responsibility for managing and prioritizing this backlog in collaboration with the development team.

In this scenario, frequent last-minute additions of mandatory features are causing the team to miss sprint goals, which indicates poor backlog grooming and a lack of alignment on priorities. This not only creates scope creep but also diminishes team morale and disrupts velocity.

The most effective and process-aligned solution is to ask the product owner to prioritize the backlog with the team (Option B). This ensures transparency, mutual understanding, and realistic planning for future sprints. Engaging the entire team in backlog prioritization allows the development team to assess feasibility, estimate effort, and commit realistically, helping to avoid frustration and misalignment.

Option A (asking the Scrum team to prioritize the backlog) is incorrect because backlog prioritization is the PO’s responsibility, not the team's. Option C (calling an internal meeting) may help vent frustrations but won’t solve the underlying structural issue. Option D (incorporating the changes into the last sprint) ignores the principles of agile planning and sustainable development, potentially repeating past mistakes.

By reinforcing proper backlog management and collaboration between the product owner and the team, the project manager ensures a more predictable, agile, and value-driven delivery process.

Question No 9:

Five Agile teams have been collaboratively working on a shared product. During the mid-project review, individual teams appeared to be on schedule with their deliverables. However, when all outputs were integrated at the product level, significant integration challenges emerged. This caused overall progress to stall, and forecasts now indicate that the originally committed features may not be delivered on time.

What approach should the project manager have taken to prevent these integration issues and maintain overall project momentum?

A. Conducted regular Scrum of Scrums to help teams address blockers collaboratively
B. Created a dedicated QA team to perform end-of-sprint testing for each team’s output
C. Delivered training sessions on integration strategies and relevant tools to the teams
D. Ensured regular and continuous integration of outputs to catch issues early and promote learning

Correct Answer:
D. Ensured regular and continuous integration of outputs to catch issues early and promote learning

Explanation:

In Agile projects, particularly those involving multiple teams, continuous integration (CI) plays a critical role in maintaining alignment and detecting defects early. While each individual team in this scenario demonstrated good progress independently, the product-level integration revealed that outputs were not syncing well. This is a classic failure of delayed integration.

The key practice to prevent such issues is frequent and continuous integration. By integrating code and features regularly—ideally daily or after every user story—teams can uncover integration issues early, rather than letting them compound until the end. CI allows teams to receive quick feedback, make corrections sooner, and reduce the risk of large-scale problems that could jeopardize the entire release.

Option A (Scrum of Scrums) is a useful communication practice but does not inherently address technical integration. Option B suggests reactive quality assurance at the end, which is contrary to Agile principles that emphasize "built-in quality" and continuous testing. Option C may increase awareness but doesn't replace the actual integration work.

Only Option D aligns directly with Agile best practices and Lean principles by promoting early and frequent validation through integration. This approach also facilitates continuous learning and encourages the teams to think holistically about the product, not just their individual components.

Question No 10: 

A project is facing a potential delay due to a team member struggling to complete their assigned tasks. Upon investigation, the project manager discovers that the issue stems from the team member’s unfamiliarity with a newly implemented system that is critical to the project's progress. The team member is otherwise competent but lacks the specific knowledge or training to work effectively with this system.

What should the project manager do to address the situation while minimizing risk to the project schedule?

A. Ask the team member to learn the new system as on-the-job training
B. Issue a change request to extend the project schedule
C. Escalate the team member's performance to the project sponsor
D. Assign an experienced resource to support the team member

Correct Answer: D. Assign an experienced resource to support the team member

Explanation:

When a team member is struggling due to lack of experience or familiarity with a new system, the project manager’s role is to provide support, resources, and guidance to ensure task completion while keeping the project on track. In this scenario, the most effective and immediate solution is to assign an experienced resource to assist the team member (Option D).

By doing so, the project manager facilitates knowledge transfer, boosts the struggling team member’s confidence, and maintains productivity. This approach balances short-term needs (keeping the project on schedule) with long-term benefits (building team capability). It’s a proactive response that strengthens team cohesion and avoids unnecessary blame or escalation.

Option A (on-the-job learning) may delay progress, as learning a complex system without guidance can be inefficient and demoralizing under time pressure. Option B (requesting a schedule extension) treats the symptom, not the cause, and should only be considered if no reasonable alternative exists. Option C (escalating to the sponsor) is premature and could damage morale without first exploring internal solutions.

Assigning a knowledgeable team member to guide the one who is struggling is consistent with good leadership and project management practices. It demonstrates adaptability and commitment to team development and project success. This decision helps mitigate risk while preserving team integrity and timeline.