• Home
• Microsoft Exams
• SC-100 - Microsoft Cybersecurity Architect

SC-100 Microsoft Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question No 1: 

Your company has a Microsoft 365 Enterprise Subscription (E5), and the Chief Compliance Officer is looking to enhance privacy management within the organization. The goal is to identify and handle personal data more efficiently, while ensuring user awareness and control over their privacy settings. You are tasked with recommending a solution that satisfies the following requirements:

1. Identify unused personal data and provide users with the tools to make informed decisions on data handling.

2. Provide notifications and guidance when a user sends personal data through Microsoft Teams.

3. Offer users proactive recommendations for mitigating privacy risks related to their actions.

Which solution should you recommend to meet these requirements?

A. Communication compliance in Insider Risk Management
B. Microsoft Viva Insights
C. Privacy Risk Management in Microsoft Priva
D. Advanced eDiscovery

Answer: C. Privacy Risk Management in Microsoft Priva

Explanation:

To enhance privacy management within a Microsoft 365 Enterprise Subscription, Microsoft Priva is the most suitable solution. This tool focuses specifically on data privacy and protection, addressing the needs outlined in the question. Let’s break down why option C, Privacy Risk Management in Microsoft Priva, is the best recommendation:

1. Identifying unused personal data and empowering users to make smart data handling decisions:

Microsoft Priva provides organizations with the ability to discover, manage, and govern personal data throughout the Microsoft 365 environment. The solution offers a data discovery feature that helps identify unused, outdated, or irrelevant personal data, allowing the organization to clean up unnecessary data. Additionally, it enables organizations to implement retention policies that align with compliance and privacy standards, ensuring users can make informed decisions about their data.

2. Notifications and guidance for sending personal data in Microsoft Teams:

Microsoft Priva integrates with Microsoft Teams, alerting users when personal data is shared through the platform. This ensures that users are notified whenever they are potentially violating privacy policies, which could lead to unauthorized data sharing. Through privacy risk detection, the system can flag sensitive information in real-time, prompting users with a warning and guidance on how to proceed with caution when sharing such data.

3. Proactive recommendations to mitigate privacy risks:

One of the key features of Microsoft Priva is its ability to provide automated recommendations for mitigating privacy risks. It analyzes user behaviors and suggests privacy-enhancing actions to help organizations comply with data protection laws such as GDPR, ensuring that personal data is handled appropriately across the organization.

In contrast, while other options such as Communication compliance (A) or Advanced eDiscovery (D) focus on data compliance and governance, they do not specifically address privacy management and personal data handling in the same way as Microsoft Priva. Furthermore, Microsoft Viva Insights (B) is primarily geared toward employee well-being and productivity, not privacy management.

Therefore, Microsoft Priva provides the most comprehensive solution to address the privacy concerns raised in the question.

Question No 2: 

Your organization has enabled Microsoft Defender for Cloud and is receiving suspicious authentication activity alerts in the Workload Protection dashboard. You need to recommend a solution that will automatically evaluate and remediate these alerts using workflow automation, with minimal development effort.

Which solution should you recommend to automate this process?

A. Azure Monitor webhooks
B. Azure Event Hubs
C. Azure Functions apps
D. Azure Logic Apps

Answer: D. Azure Logic Apps

Explanation:

In this scenario, Azure Logic Apps is the ideal solution for automating workflows and addressing suspicious activity alerts with minimal development effort. Let’s explain why:

1. Minimizing development effort:

Azure Logic Apps provide a no-code or low-code solution for automating workflows. It is designed for scenarios like this one, where the task is to trigger an action in response to an alert or event. Logic Apps allow you to easily create workflows that can automatically respond to suspicious authentication activity alerts in Defender for Cloud without needing deep programming skills.

2. Integration with Defender for Cloud:

Azure Logic Apps can integrate seamlessly with Microsoft Defender for Cloud through built-in connectors, enabling the automation of responses to security alerts. For example, once an alert is triggered, a Logic App can automatically execute a set of remediation actions, such as notifying the security team, suspending a user account, or initiating an investigation workflow.

3. Versatile and scalable:

Logic Apps can handle complex workflows with conditional logic, approvals, and multiple actions. They are highly scalable, meaning that as your security needs grow, the Logic Apps can easily be modified or expanded.

While Azure Functions (C) can also automate actions, it requires more development effort and might not be as user-friendly for those without a programming background. Azure Monitor Webhooks (A) and Azure Event Hubs (B) are more suited for collecting and analyzing data, but they don't provide the same level of workflow automation that Logic Apps offers.

Question No 3: 

Your company is migrating to Azure, and you plan to use the following storage workloads:

• Azure Storage blob containers

• Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2

• Azure Storage file shares

• Azure Disk Storage
  
  

Which two of these storage workloads support authentication using Azure Active Directory (Azure AD)?

A. Azure Storage file shares
B. Azure Disk Storage
C. Azure Storage blob containers
D. Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2

Answer: C. Azure Storage blob containers, D. Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2

Explanation:

Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) authentication is available for certain Azure storage services. Let’s examine the two selected answers:

1. Azure Storage Blob Containers:

Azure Storage blob containers support authentication via Azure Active Directory (Azure AD). This allows you to manage access to your blob data using Azure AD identities, which is especially useful for implementing fine-grained access control in a secure manner. Azure AD authentication eliminates the need for managing storage keys, making it easier to comply with organizational security policies.

2. Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2:

Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 is built on top of Azure Blob Storage and supports Azure AD authentication. This allows for integration with Azure AD identities for secure access management, making it easier to manage permissions at a granular level. Data Lake Gen2 is optimized for big data analytics workloads and enables access control through Azure AD.
However, Azure Storage file shares (A) and Azure Disk Storage (B) do not natively support Azure AD authentication in the same way as blob storage and Data Lake Storage Gen2. Instead, access to these services is typically managed via storage account keys or shared access signatures (SAS), which might not align with the same level of integration for identity-based authentication as provided by Azure AD.

Thus, Azure Storage blob containers and Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 are the correct answers for supporting Azure AD authentication.

Question No 4:

You are working with a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription and an Azure subscription to design a comprehensive Microsoft deployment. Your task is to recommend a solution that allows the security operations team to create custom views and a dashboard for the analysis of security events. The solution should enable efficient visualization of security data and provide the ability to tailor the dashboard to specific needs. 

Which Microsoft Sentinel feature should you recommend for this scenario?

A. Notebooks
B. Playbooks
C. Workbooks
D. Threat Intelligence

Answer: The correct answer is C. Workbooks.

Explanation:

When designing a solution for security event analysis and visualization in Microsoft Sentinel, it's important to understand the specific capabilities each feature offers. In this case, the solution needs to provide custom views and dashboards for analyzing security events, so let’s break down each option to identify the best fit:

1. Notebooks (A):

Notebooks in Microsoft Sentinel are a tool that can be used for more advanced data analysis and are typically used for conducting investigations. They support both Python and Kusto Query Language (KQL), allowing data scientists and analysts to perform detailed and complex analysis on security data.

While notebooks can be used to analyze data, they are not typically used for creating dashboards or custom views for ongoing monitoring. They are more suited for exploratory and ad-hoc analysis rather than for real-time visualization.

2. Playbooks (B):

Playbooks in Microsoft Sentinel are automated workflows that help respond to security incidents. They can trigger specific actions based on predefined rules or conditions, such as sending alerts or gathering more data about a security incident.

Although playbooks are vital for automation and incident response, they are not designed for creating custom views or dashboards. Playbooks are used to take action in response to security events rather than providing ongoing analysis and visualization of those events.

3. Workbooks (C):

Workbooks in Microsoft Sentinel are the ideal feature for this scenario. Workbooks are used for creating customized views and dashboards that allow security teams to visualize security data, track trends, and analyze events. They support KQL queries to pull in data from various sources within Microsoft Sentinel and Azure Monitor, and they allow users to create visual representations of that data using graphs, tables, maps, and more.

Workbooks provide a flexible, interactive environment where custom dashboards can be built to track security metrics, monitor incidents, and display real-time data. This makes workbooks the best choice for a solution that includes custom views and dashboards.

4. Threat Intelligence (D):

Threat Intelligence in Microsoft Sentinel refers to the integration of external threat intelligence feeds that help security teams identify and respond to known threats. This feature enriches security data with external information about potential threats but does not provide the tools needed to create custom views or dashboards.

While valuable for providing context to security events, Threat Intelligence is not focused on the visualization or dashboarding of security data.

Conclusion: To meet the requirements of creating custom views and dashboards for security event analysis, Workbooks are the most suitable solution. They offer the flexibility and visualization tools needed to design detailed, interactive dashboards tailored to the security team’s needs. By using workbooks, teams can continuously monitor security events, analyze trends, and gain insights from the data in a way that is both informative and actionable.

Question No 5: 

Your company is using Microsoft Defender for Identity as part of your Microsoft 365 subscription. You have been notified of incidents where user identities have been compromised. You need to design a solution to expose several accounts so that attackers can exploit them. When these accounts are targeted, an alert should be triggered.

Which Microsoft Defender for Identity feature should you recommend in this scenario?

A. Sensitivity labels
B. Custom user tags
C. Standalone sensors
D. Honeytoken entity tags

Answer: D. Honeytoken entity tags

Explanation:

In Microsoft Defender for Identity, Honeytoken entity tags are specifically designed to create fake or "bait" accounts that are exposed to potential attackers. When an attacker attempts to exploit or interact with these accounts, an alert is triggered in Defender for Identity. This helps in identifying attackers early in their activities and can serve as an early warning system. Honeytokens are typically not used by legitimate users, and any interaction with these accounts is considered suspicious, triggering alerts to security teams.

This feature is ideal for identifying attackers and malicious behavior by luring them into attempting to exploit accounts that are specifically set up for detection purposes. Honeytokens, when configured properly, help in minimizing false positives and detecting attackers trying to escalate privileges or move laterally within the network.

The other options are not designed for this specific purpose:

• A. Sensitivity labels: These labels are used to classify and protect content based on its sensitivity, such as documents and emails. They are primarily designed for data governance and information protection, not for detecting compromised identities.
  
  

• B. Custom user tags: While custom tags can be used in Defender for Identity to categorize users, they do not function in a way that would allow for the creation of bait accounts or the detection of attackers exploiting these accounts.
  
  

• C. Standalone sensors: Standalone sensors are used for monitoring network traffic and other activities within an on-premises network. While they help in detecting suspicious behavior, they are not specifically meant for creating fake accounts or triggering alerts based on attacks against specific accounts.

Question No 6: 

Your company is migrating all on-premises workloads to Azure and Microsoft 365. You need to design a security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) strategy within Microsoft Sentinel to meet the following requirements:

1. Minimize manual intervention from security operation analysts.

2. Support triaging of alerts within Microsoft Teams channels.

Which feature should you include in your strategy?

A. KQL
B. Playbooks
C. Data connectors
D. Workbooks

Answer: B. Playbooks

Explanation: 

In Microsoft Sentinel, Playbooks are automated workflows designed to streamline security operations tasks, which are crucial for reducing manual intervention. Playbooks are based on Azure Logic Apps and can be triggered in response to specific incidents, alerts, or conditions detected by Sentinel. These workflows can automatically take actions such as sending alerts, initiating investigations, and escalating incidents. Playbooks are essential for orchestrating responses across different security tools and services, allowing for automated actions that help security teams respond quickly and consistently.

In this scenario, the requirement to minimize manual intervention by security analysts is perfectly addressed by playbooks, which can handle tasks such as sending alerts to Microsoft Teams, isolating infected devices, or even performing remediation actions. By integrating with Microsoft Teams, playbooks can automatically post messages in designated channels, ensuring that teams are informed and can quickly triage alerts.

The other options are not as directly suited to this particular use case:

• A. KQL (Kusto Query Language): KQL is the query language used in Microsoft Sentinel for querying and analyzing log data. While KQL is useful for identifying and investigating security threats, it does not provide orchestration or automation capabilities for handling alerts and responding to incidents.

• C. Data connectors: Data connectors are used to ingest data into Microsoft Sentinel from various sources such as firewalls, servers, and applications. While they are necessary for gathering data for analysis, they do not automate responses or help minimize manual intervention in the way that playbooks do.

• D. Workbooks: Workbooks are used for data visualization and reporting in Microsoft Sentinel. While they can provide insightful dashboards and help in visualizing security data, they do not offer automation or alert triage capabilities as required in this scenario.

In summary, Playbooks are the best choice for automating the security response process, minimizing manual intervention, and enabling quick alert triaging within Microsoft Teams.

Question No 7:

You have an Azure subscription that contains multiple resources such as virtual machines, storage accounts, and Azure SQL databases. All resources in your subscription are backed up multiple times a day using Azure Backup. To protect these resources against ransomware attacks, you are tasked with developing a strategy that will allow you to restore the resources in the event of a successful ransomware attack.

What Azure Backup controls would you recommend enabling to ensure that you can successfully restore your resources after a ransomware attack? 

Which two controls must be enabled to achieve this? Select two options that provide a complete solution.

A. Enable soft delete for backups.
B. Require PINs for critical operations.
C. Encrypt backups by using customer-managed keys (CMKs).
D. Perform offline backups to Azure Data Box.
E. Use Azure Monitor notifications when backup configurations change.

Answer: The correct answers are A. Enable soft delete for backups and B. Require PINs for critical operations.

Explanation:

Ransomware attacks are a significant concern for organizations that rely heavily on data for their operations. These attacks often target data backups to prevent victims from restoring their data after an attack. To protect against such attacks in an Azure environment, several Azure Backup controls can be implemented to ensure that you can recover your data after a ransomware incident. Below is an explanation of the two recommended controls:

1. Enable soft delete for backups (Option A)

Soft delete is a feature in Azure Backup that ensures your backup data is protected even if it is accidentally or maliciously deleted. When soft delete is enabled, any deleted backup data is retained in the backup vault for a specified retention period (14 to 30 additional days), during which time it cannot be permanently removed.

If ransomware attacks your resources and deletes or encrypts backup data, soft delete will allow you to restore the backups even after they are marked as deleted. The soft delete feature helps to ensure that your backup data is not lost or permanently compromised, providing a safety net for recovery after a ransomware attack.

2. Require PINs for critical operations (Option B)

Azure Backup allows organizations to configure an additional layer of security through the use of a PIN (Personal Identification Number) for performing critical operations, such as restoring backups or deleting backup items. This control adds an extra level of protection by ensuring that only authorized personnel can carry out these critical tasks.

In the case of a ransomware attack, it is likely that attackers will attempt to disable or manipulate backups to prevent the recovery of data. By requiring a PIN for critical operations, you ensure that an attacker cannot easily perform sensitive actions on backup data without the necessary authentication. This control adds a significant security measure to safeguard backup integrity and ensures that recovery is possible even in the event of a successful ransomware attack.

Why the Other Options Are Not as Effective:

C. Encrypt backups by using customer-managed keys (CMKs)

While encryption is essential for protecting data at rest, it is not directly related to the restoration of backups in the context of a ransomware attack. Encrypting backups with customer-managed keys (CMKs) adds a layer of control over who can access the data, but it does not provide a specific mechanism to recover data after a ransomware attack. In fact, the issue with ransomware is typically not related to unauthorized access to encrypted backups but rather to the deletion or modification of backup data. Therefore, while CMK encryption is a good practice for data security, it does not directly address the recovery aspect after an attack.

D. Perform offline backups to Azure Data Box

Performing offline backups using an Azure Data Box is a method of storing backup data outside of the Azure cloud environment. While this provides an additional layer of data protection, it is not a solution that directly integrates with Azure Backup for restoration in case of a ransomware attack. Azure Backup already provides robust cloud-based protection, and offline backups may not be practical or necessary for most scenarios. Moreover, offline backups could be time-consuming to restore, especially in the case of ransomware attacks where rapid recovery is needed.

E. Use Azure Monitor notifications when backup configurations change

Azure Monitor is a powerful tool for monitoring and notifying you of changes in your Azure resources, including backup configurations. While this can help track changes in your backup policies or configurations, it does not directly address the need for recovery after a ransomware attack. Notifications will alert you about backup changes, but they will not prevent or mitigate the impact of a ransomware attack or ensure that backups remain intact for restoration.

To ensure that Azure Backup can effectively be used to restore resources after a ransomware attack, enabling soft delete for backups and requiring PINs for critical operations is crucial. These controls provide a robust recovery mechanism, ensuring that backup data cannot be easily deleted or manipulated by attackers.