Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate DEA-C01 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set1 Q1-20

Visit here for our full Amazon AWS Certified Data Engineer – Associate DEA-C01 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 1:

You are designing a data ingestion pipeline for a high-traffic e-commerce website that produces clickstream data. The requirement is to store raw events durably in a data lake for later analysis while minimizing operational overhead. Which solution should you implement?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon DynamoDB
B) Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose and Amazon S3
C) Amazon SNS and Amazon RDS
D) Amazon SQS and Amazon Redshift

Answer: B) Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose and Amazon S3

Explanation:

In this scenario, the main challenges are handling high-velocity streaming data, ensuring durability, and reducing operational complexity. Amazon Kinesis provides two primary options for ingesting streaming data: Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) and Kinesis Data Firehose (KDF). KDS is designed for real-time processing, where developers must manage shards, scaling, checkpointing, and consumer applications. While KDS is powerful for custom processing pipelines, it requires significant operational effort.

Kinesis Data Firehose, on the other hand, is a fully managed service designed for loading streaming data into AWS destinations such as Amazon S3, Redshift, Elasticsearch, or Splunk. Firehose automatically scales, buffers incoming data, compresses records, and retries failed deliveries, reducing operational overhead. It can also perform lightweight transformations using AWS Lambda, such as converting JSON logs to Parquet for efficient storage and querying in a data lake.

For durable storage, Amazon S3 is the most suitable solution. S3 provides virtually unlimited storage with 11 nines of durability, supports encryption at rest and in transit, versioning, and lifecycle policies to manage cost-efficient retention of historical data. By storing raw events in S3, organizations can retain an immutable source of truth, allowing reprocessing or backfilling analytics pipelines at any time.

Alternative options are less suitable. Using Kinesis Data Streams with DynamoDB would require custom logic to persist the events into a data lake and would not scale efficiently for large volumes. Amazon SNS and RDS are not designed for high-throughput streaming ingestion or cost-efficient storage of large, unstructured datasets. SQS with Redshift would require batch processing and does not natively handle streaming data, making it less ideal for real-time ingestion.

By implementing Kinesis Data Firehose and S3, the organization can build a serverless, highly available streaming ingestion pipeline. Data can be further processed downstream using AWS Glue for ETL, Amazon Athena for ad-hoc querying, or Amazon Redshift Spectrum for analytics directly on the S3 data lake. This approach ensures that data is durably stored, cost-effective, and ready for analytics, while minimizing manual operational tasks. Firehose also integrates with CloudWatch for monitoring throughput, delivery success, and failures, providing operational visibility without managing infrastructure.

In practice, this combination is considered a best practice for AWS streaming data pipelines, offering resilience, scalability, and simplicity while ensuring the organization can analyze large-scale clickstream data efficiently.

Question 2:

Your organization needs to run complex analytical queries on structured transactional data at a petabyte scale, with low latency and high concurrency. Which AWS service should you implement?

A) Amazon RDS
B) Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon DynamoDB
D) Amazon S3

Answer: B) Amazon Redshift

Explanation:

Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehouse designed specifically for analytical workloads over large structured datasets. Unlike OLTP databases like RDS or NoSQL databases like DynamoDB, Redshift is optimized for complex queries, joins, aggregations, and large-scale analytics. Redshift uses columnar storage, massively parallel processing (MPP), and sophisticated query optimization, which enables it to process petabytes of data efficiently.

Redshift supports multiple node types and now includes RA3 nodes, which allow compute and storage separation, providing cost-efficient scaling for large datasets. By integrating with S3 via Redshift Spectrum, users can query structured and semi-structured data without moving it into the data warehouse, enabling flexible data lake analytics.

Administrators can optimize performance using distribution keys, sort keys, and compression encodings. Redshift also supports materialized views to speed up frequently run queries. Concurrency scaling ensures that multiple users or BI tools can run queries simultaneously without impacting performance.

Other options are less suitable. Amazon RDS is for transactional workloads and doesn’t scale efficiently for analytics at the petabyte scale. DynamoDB is a key-value and document database and is not intended for complex joins or aggregations. S3 alone stores data but doesn’t provide query processing natively; Athena can query it, but it doesn’t provide a dedicated, high-performance warehouse for structured analytics.

Using Redshift ensures fast, scalable, and secure analytics on structured datasets, supporting business intelligence and reporting tools. It integrates seamlessly with AWS Glue, QuickSight, and ML workflows, enabling organizations to derive insights efficiently from large volumes of data while maintaining security and compliance.

Question 3:

Your team needs to query semi-structured JSON logs stored in S3 without provisioning servers, while paying only for the queries executed. Which AWS service should you implement?

A) Amazon Redshift
B) Amazon Athena
C) Amazon RDS
D) Amazon EMR

Answer: B) Amazon Athena

Explanation:

Amazon Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that enables querying data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL syntax. It is ideal for semi-structured formats such as JSON, Parquet, and ORC, and because it is serverless, there is no infrastructure to provision or manage. Users pay only for the data scanned, making it cost-efficient for ad-hoc or exploratory analytics.

Athena integrates seamlessly with AWS Glue Data Catalog, which maintains metadata about datasets, including schema, partitions, and formats. This enables users to create logical tables over raw S3 data, making querying and reporting easier. Athena also supports partitioned datasets, which allows skipping unnecessary data and reducing query costs.

Alternative solutions are less suitable. Redshift requires provisioning and loading the data into the warehouse, which is not serverless and can be costly for ad-hoc queries. RDS cannot handle petabyte-scale datasets efficiently, and EMR provides a cluster-based solution, which requires management and longer startup times, making it less ideal for on-demand queries.

By implementing Athena, your team can run SQL queries directly on S3, generate reports, join multiple datasets, and integrate results with BI tools such as QuickSight. The serverless model simplifies operational management, reduces costs, and allows rapid exploration of semi-structured or log data, making it ideal for ad-hoc analytics and event-driven insights.

Question 4:

You are designing a real-time streaming analytics pipeline that aggregates data from multiple IoT sensors and delivers results to dashboards within seconds. Which combination of services is the best fit?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Redshift
B) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics
C) Amazon SQS and Amazon Athena
D) Amazon SNS and Amazon RDS

Answer: B) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics

Explanation:

Real-time streaming analytics requires the ability to ingest, process, and analyze data with low latency. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) provides the ingestion layer, allowing multiple producers (IoT sensors) to continuously send data into the stream. KDS automatically scales to handle high throughput and provides durable, ordered storage for streaming records.

Kinesis Data Analytics (KDA) processes streaming data in real time using SQL queries or Apache Flink applications. This enables aggregation, filtering, and transformation before delivering results to dashboards, S3, or other services. Using KDS with KDA allows organizations to build a serverless real-time analytics pipeline without provisioning complex infrastructure.

Alternative solutions like SQS and Athena or SNS and RDS are unsuitable for low-latency analytics. SQS is for message queuing and does not provide stream processing; Athena is batch-oriented. SNS is for pub/sub notifications, and RDS is OLTP-oriented, so they cannot perform real-time aggregations efficiently.

This architecture ensures fast processing, scalability, and integration with visualization tools, enabling dashboards to display near real-time insights from IoT devices while maintaining reliability and fault tolerance.

Question 5:

Your company needs to orchestrate ETL workflows that move data from S3 into Redshift nightly and perform transformations. Which AWS service provides a serverless, scalable orchestration solution?

A) AWS Data Pipeline
B) AWS Glue
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Step Functions

Answer: B) AWS Glue

Explanation:

AWS Glue is a serverless ETL service designed to extract, transform, and load data at scale. It can crawl datasets in S3, infer schema, and catalog metadata in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, making it easier to query data later using Athena or Redshift Spectrum. Glue also provides managed Spark-based ETL jobs, which are scalable and cost-effective, as users pay only for the compute used during job execution.

Glue allows developers to define transformations in Python or Scala, automatically handling job scheduling, retry logic, and provisioning of resources. Integration with Redshift enables ETL pipelines to load transformed data efficiently into the warehouse for analytics. Glue can also trigger jobs based on events (e.g., S3 file arrival), or run on a scheduled basis, supporting complex workflows.

Alternative solutions are less suitable. AWS Data Pipeline is older, requires more setup, and is not fully serverless. EMR is cluster-based and requires management overhead. Step Functions orchestrates workflows but does not provide built-in ETL processing; it would need to integrate with other services to perform actual transformations.

By using AWS Glue, the company can implement serverless, automated ETL pipelines that scale dynamically, integrate with S3 and Redshift, and reduce operational complexity while maintaining flexibility for complex transformations and workflow orchestration.

Question 6:

Your organization wants to ensure that sensitive data in S3 is encrypted and access is restricted only to authorized users. Which combination of AWS features should you implement?

A) Server-Side Encryption with Amazon S3-Managed Keys (SSE-S3) and S3 Bucket Policies
B) Client-Side Encryption and IAM Roles
C) AWS KMS-managed keys (SSE-KMS) and S3 Bucket Policies
D) Public S3 Bucket and VPC Endpoint

Answer: C) AWS KMS-managed keys (SSE-KMS) and S3 Bucket Policies

Explanation:

Protecting sensitive data in S3 requires encryption at rest and fine-grained access control. SSE-KMS provides server-side encryption using AWS Key Management Service (KMS), allowing the organization to manage encryption keys centrally, enforce key rotation, and audit usage. KMS provides detailed CloudTrail logs for key usage, helping meet compliance requirements.

S3 bucket policies complement encryption by providing fine-grained access controls, specifying which IAM users, roles, or external accounts can perform actions such as GetObject or PutObject. Bucket policies can also enforce conditions, such as requiring requests over HTTPS or restricting access to specific IP ranges or VPC endpoints.

Alternatives are less suitable. SSE-S3 encrypts objects but does not provide key management flexibility or auditability. Client-side encryption puts the burden on the client to manage keys securely, which can increase operational risk. Public S3 buckets expose data to everyone and are not secure.

Using SSE-KMS with bucket policies ensures robust data security, centralized key control, compliance auditing, and controlled access to sensitive S3 data, aligning with best practices for enterprise-grade data protection.

Question 7:

You are designing a data lake that will store both structured and unstructured data, support ad-hoc queries, and allow analytics using Redshift and Athena. Which storage solution is best?

A) Amazon RDS
B) Amazon S3
C) Amazon DynamoDB
D) Amazon Redshift

Answer: B) Amazon S3

Explanation:

A data lake must handle large-scale, diverse datasets while supporting analytics. Amazon S3 is ideal because it offers virtually unlimited, highly durable storage for structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. S3 supports multiple storage classes, versioning, lifecycle policies, and encryption, enabling cost-efficient storage management.

Integration with Athena allows serverless SQL queries directly on S3 objects, while Redshift Spectrum enables analytics on S3 data without moving it into Redshift. AWS Glue can catalog datasets, infer schema, and maintain a unified metadata repository, which simplifies analytics and ETL workflows.

Other options are unsuitable. RDS is for transactional relational data and cannot scale efficiently for petabyte-scale data. DynamoDB is a NoSQL database optimized for key-value lookups rather than analytics. Redshift is a warehouse, not an object storage solution, and is not cost-effective for storing raw data of all types.

Using S3 as a data lake provides flexible, cost-efficient storage, seamless integration with analytics tools, and a foundation for building a centralized enterprise data lake that supports multiple workloads and query engines.

Question 8:

You need to process large amounts of historical data stored in S3 using a distributed framework for ETL and machine learning. Which AWS service is most suitable?

A) Amazon Redshift
B) Amazon EMR
C) Amazon Athena
D) AWS Glue

Answer: B) Amazon EMR

Explanation:

Amazon EMR is a managed big data platform for processing massive datasets using Apache Spark, Hadoop, Presto, and Hive. EMR enables distributed ETL, analytics, and machine learning workloads at scale. EMR clusters can read directly from S3, reducing the need to move large datasets.

EMR is highly configurable, supporting different instance types, cluster scaling, and custom applications. Spark on EMR is ideal for ETL transformations, aggregation, and ML feature engineering, while Hadoop MapReduce can handle batch processing at scale. EMR also integrates with AWS Glue Catalog, S3, Redshift, and SageMaker, allowing seamless data flow and ML model development.

Alternatives are less suitable. Redshift is a data warehouse and cannot efficiently process unstructured data. Athena is serverless but intended for ad-hoc SQL queries, not large-scale distributed ETL. Glue is serverless but not optimized for intensive compute workloads like Spark on EMR.

EMR provides a scalable, flexible, and managed environment for processing large historical datasets, enabling organizations to perform complex transformations, aggregations, and ML workflows efficiently.

Question 9:

You want to ingest and store streaming IoT data in real-time and perform time-series analysis. Which AWS services provide the most efficient and scalable solution?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Timestream
B) Amazon SQS and Amazon RDS
C) Amazon SNS and DynamoDB
D) Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose and Amazon Redshift

Answer: A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Timestream

Explanation:

IoT data is high-volume, time-stamped, and continuous, requiring low-latency ingestion and time-series analytics. Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) provides a scalable, durable ingestion pipeline for high-throughput data, ensuring ordered and reliable delivery to downstream consumers.

Amazon Timestream is a purpose-built time-series database optimized for storing and analyzing time-stamped data. It provides features such as automatic data tiering, compression, and built-in time-series functions like smoothing, interpolation, and windowing. Timestream integrates seamlessly with KDS, Lambda, and QuickSight for near real-time analytics and visualization.

Alternative solutions are less suitable. SQS and RDS cannot efficiently handle high-volume streaming data. SNS and DynamoDB lack native time-series capabilities and analytics functions. Firehose and Redshift could work for batch or micro-batch processing, but are less efficient for real-time time-series workloads.

This combination allows real-time ingestion, scalable storage, and optimized time-series queries, making it ideal for IoT analytics, operational monitoring, and predictive maintenance.

Question 10:

Your team needs to transform semi-structured JSON data stored in S3 and load it into Redshift nightly while automating the workflow. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

A) AWS Glue
B) Amazon EMR
C) AWS Data Pipeline
D) Amazon Athena

Answer: A) AWS Glue

Explanation:

AWS Glue is a serverless ETL service that simplifies extract, transform, and load workflows. It can crawl S3 data, infer schemas for semi-structured formats like JSON, and maintain a metadata catalog. Glue ETL jobs can perform complex transformations using Python or Scala, and can load the resulting data into Redshift for analytics.

Glue is serverless, scaling automatically to handle large datasets, and integrates with CloudWatch for monitoring and Glue Workflows for orchestration. Scheduling jobs allows nightly automated ETL, reducing operational overhead. Glue also integrates with Athena, Redshift Spectrum, and SageMaker for analytics and ML workloads.

Alternative solutions are less suitable. EMR requires cluster management and is better for heavy distributed processing. Data Pipeline is older, less flexible, and not fully serverless. Athena is intended for query and analysis, not ETL.

Using AWS Glue ensures serverless, automated ETL pipelines, centralized metadata management, and seamless integration with Redshift and analytics workflows, making it the preferred solution for nightly JSON transformations. One of the standout features of AWS Glue is its serverless architecture, which eliminates the need to provision and manage underlying infrastructure. This means organizations can focus entirely on data processing and transformation logic rather than worrying about scalability, patching, or hardware management. By automatically scaling resources up or down based on workload, Glue provides both cost efficiency and high performance, especially for data-intensive tasks like nightly JSON ingestion and transformation.

Another key advantage of AWS Glue is its automated schema discovery and metadata cataloging. The Glue Data Catalog acts as a centralized repository, storing metadata about various data sources across the organization. This makes it easier to track data lineage, enforce governance policies, and ensure consistency across analytics pipelines. With schema detection capabilities, Glue can automatically infer the structure of JSON files, eliminating manual schema definition and reducing errors. This is particularly beneficial when dealing with semi-structured or evolving JSON datasets, as the platform can adapt to changes without requiring extensive rework.

Integration with other AWS services is another reason Glue is ideal for ETL workflows. Glue seamlessly connects with Amazon Redshift, S3, RDS, and Athena, enabling smooth data ingestion, transformation, and analytics. For instance, after transforming JSON files, Glue can directly load processed data into Redshift tables for immediate use in business intelligence tools or machine learning models. Additionally, Glue supports job scheduling and workflow orchestration, allowing organizations to automate nightly ETL jobs with minimal operational overhead.

Glue also provides support for multiple programming languages, including Python and Scala, giving developers flexibility to write custom transformations. With built-in connectors and transformations, complex tasks such as flattening nested JSON structures, filtering records, or performing joins across datasets can be executed efficiently. This combination of serverless execution, centralized metadata, seamless integration, and automation makes AWS Glue the preferred choice for enterprises aiming to streamline ETL processes, improve data quality, and accelerate analytics-driven decision-making.

Question 11:

You are building a real-time analytics system for processing logs from thousands of web servers. The system must perform aggregation, filtering, and send results to dashboards with minimal latency. Which AWS service combination should you implement?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics
B) Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose and Amazon S3
C) Amazon SQS and Amazon Redshift
D) Amazon SNS and Amazon RDS

Answer: A) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics

Explanation 

Real-time analytics requires low-latency processing, scalability, and the ability to handle high-throughput data streams. Option A, Kinesis Data Streams (KDS) paired with Kinesis Data Analytics (KDA), is designed for exactly this use case. KDS provides a durable, scalable ingestion layer where multiple web servers can push logs continuously. Data is divided into shards, each handling a portion of the traffic, allowing horizontal scaling to accommodate growing workloads.

Kinesis Data Analytics processes the incoming streams in real time using SQL or Apache Flink, enabling filtering, aggregations, windowed computations, and anomaly detection. Processed results can be pushed to dashboards via Amazon CloudWatch, S3, Redshift, or third-party visualization tools. This approach provides sub-second latency and eliminates the need for batch processing, making it ideal for operational dashboards or real-time monitoring.

Option B, Kinesis Data Firehose with S3, is more suited for near-real-time or batch delivery. Firehose buffers data and delivers it to S3 in intervals (e.g., every minute), introducing latency unsuitable for real-time analytics dashboards. While excellent for storing raw logs for long-term analysis, it cannot perform live aggregations or transformations in real time without integrating with additional services such as Lambda.

Option C, SQS with Redshift, is also inappropriate for real-time analytics. SQS is a message queue service that provides at-least-once delivery, but it does not support stream processing or low-latency analytics. Redshift is a data warehouse, excellent for structured queries on large datasets, but ingesting from SQS and querying continuously would result in batch-style delays, failing the real-time requirement.

Option D, SNS with RDS, is unsuitable because SNS is a pub/sub service, which is not optimized for high-throughput streaming logs and does not provide stream processing capabilities. RDS is a transactional relational database designed for OLTP workloads, not for aggregating millions of events per second. Attempting to implement real-time analytics with SNS and RDS would create performance bottlenecks, high operational overhead, and significant latency.

In summary, only Kinesis Data Streams + Kinesis Data Analytics offers a fully managed, scalable, real-time streaming solution capable of aggregating and analyzing high-volume logs with sub-second latency. Firehose, SQS, and SNS are better suited for batch or event-driven workflows but cannot meet low-latency, real-time aggregation requirements on their own. Using KDS and KDA allows developers to focus on analytics logic rather than infrastructure scaling or shard management, while providing seamless integration with visualization and storage layers. This combination is considered a best-practice architecture for real-time operational analytics on AWS.

Question 12:

Your team wants to build a serverless ETL pipeline that transforms JSON logs stored in S3 nightly and loads them into Amazon Redshift. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

A) AWS Glue
B) Amazon EMR
C) AWS Data Pipeline
D) Amazon Athena

Answer: A) AWS Glue

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Glue, is a fully managed serverless ETL service. Glue can crawl S3 data, infer the schema, and maintain a data catalog. ETL jobs can be written in Python or Scala, allowing complex transformations of JSON logs before loading the results into Amazon Redshift. Glue supports job scheduling, monitoring, retry mechanisms, and integration with CloudWatch for logs and metrics, making it an ideal choice for nightly automated pipelines.

Option B, Amazon EMR, is also capable of processing large-scale data using Spark, Hive, or Hadoop. While EMR provides powerful distributed computing, it requires provisioning clusters, managing scaling, and additional configuration. For scheduled nightly ETL, EMR introduces operational overhead compared to a serverless Glue job that automatically scales. It is better suited for ad-hoc, high-performance data processing rather than lightweight nightly transformations.

Option C, AWS Data Pipeline, is an older orchestration service for ETL. While it can move data between S3, Redshift, and RDS, it lacks the serverless execution model and native transformations of Glue. Setting up transformations often requires external scripts or EMR jobs, increasing operational complexity. Glue has effectively replaced Data Pipeline in modern AWS ETL architectures.

Option D, Amazon Athena, is a serverless query engine for S3, allowing SQL queries on semi-structured data. While Athena can perform transformations through SQL queries, it is not designed for scheduled ETL pipelines or data loading into Redshift. Athena is ideal for ad-hoc analytics but lacks robust workflow orchestration and job management for nightly pipelines.

In conclusion, AWS Glue provides a fully serverless, scalable, and managed ETL solution. It minimizes operational overhead, integrates with Redshift seamlessly, supports transformations, and allows scheduled nightly execution. Alternatives like EMR, Data Pipeline, and Athena can process or query the data, but either require more management, lack serverless execution, or do not support automated Redshift loading, making Glue the best choice for this scenario.

Question 13:

Your organization wants to store time-series IoT sensor data and perform analytics on recent and historical trends. Which AWS service is most suitable?

A) Amazon Timestream
B) Amazon DynamoDB
C) Amazon S3
D) Amazon Redshift

Answer: A) Amazon Timestream

Explanation 

Option A, Amazon Timestream, is a purpose-built time-series database optimized for storing and analyzing large-scale IoT or sensor data. Timestream automatically manages data retention policies, tiered storage, and compression, which allows queries on recent, hot data in memory and historical, cold data from disk. It also provides time-series functions like smoothing, interpolation, and aggregations across time windows, ideal for IoT analytics and monitoring.

Option B, DynamoDB, is a fast and scalable NoSQL database, suitable for key-value or document workloads. While it can store time-stamped records, it lacks native time-series functions and built-in retention policies. Querying historical trends efficiently would require additional design patterns (e.g., GSI, TTL, or batch processing), increasing complexity and cost.

Option C, Amazon S3, provides durable object storage for raw sensor data, including JSON, CSV, or Parquet. While S3 is excellent for long-term storage and ad-hoc analytics with Athena or Redshift Spectrum, it cannot perform efficient, real-time time-series queries. Using S3 alone would require additional analytics services, increasing latency.

Option D, Amazon Redshift, is a data warehouse for structured analytics. Redshift can store historical IoT data, but it is not optimized for ingesting high-frequency sensor data or performing time-series functions efficiently. Continuous ingestion at the IoT rate may require batching or micro-batching, adding latency and operational overhead.

Amazon Timestream provides a fully managed, scalable, and cost-effective solution for storing and analyzing time-series data. It enables real-time queries on streaming data, as well as historical trend analysis, with minimal management effort. By automatically handling data lifecycle, compression, and tiering, Timestream simplifies time-series workloads while providing native functions that are otherwise difficult to implement in DynamoDB, S3, or Redshift.

Question 14:

You need to run ad-hoc SQL queries on raw S3 data without provisioning servers and pay only for the data scanned. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

A) Amazon Athena
B) Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Glue

Answer: A) Amazon Athena

Explanation 

Option A, Amazon Athena, is a serverless query service that allows users to run standard SQL queries on data stored in S3. Athena is pay-per-query, eliminating the need to provision or manage servers. It integrates with AWS Glue Data Catalog, enabling schema discovery and metadata management for structured or semi-structured data. Partitioning and columnar formats (Parquet, ORC) further reduce cost and improve query performance.

Option B, Amazon Redshift, is a fully managed data warehouse. Redshift requires loading data into tables, provisioning clusters, and managing storage and compute separately (especially with RA3 nodes). While Redshift provides low-latency queries on large datasets, it is not cost-efficient for ad-hoc queries on raw S3 data because users must maintain the warehouse even if queries are infrequent.

Option C, Amazon EMR, can run Hive or Spark SQL queries on S3, but it requires provisioning clusters, managing resources, and handling job scheduling. EMR is suitable for large-scale batch processing but introduces operational overhead and startup latency for ad-hoc queries, making it less convenient than Athena.

Option D, AWS Glue, is primarily an ETL service. While Glue can transform S3 data and catalog metadata, it does not provide a serverless query engine optimized for ad-hoc analysis. Using Glue for queries would require running ETL jobs, which is slower, more complex, and more expensive than Athena for simple ad-hoc queries.

Athena’s serverless model, integration with Glue, support for standard SQL, and ability to query partitioned and compressed datasets make it the most efficient and cost-effective choice for ad-hoc analytics on raw S3 data. Alternatives like Redshift, EMR, or Glue either require more infrastructure, management, or are not optimized for pay-per-query serverless analytics.

Question 15:

Your team needs to orchestrate a workflow where multiple ETL jobs must run in sequence, handle retries, and trigger downstream jobs. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

A) AWS Step Functions
B) AWS Glue
C) Amazon EMR
D) AWS Data Pipeline

Answer: A) AWS Step Functions

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Step Functions, is a serverless workflow orchestration service that enables coordination of multiple tasks and jobs in sequence or parallel. Step Functions supports error handling, retries, conditional branching, and timeouts, making it ideal for orchestrating ETL pipelines, data validation, or multi-step analytics workflows. It integrates with AWS Lambda, Glue, EMR, and Redshift, enabling automation across multiple services.

Option B, AWS Glue, is primarily an ETL service, not a workflow orchestrator. Glue Workflows allow chaining of jobs to some extent, but for complex logic, conditional paths, or retries, Step Functions is more robust and flexible. Glue is best for data transformations, not generalized orchestration.

Option C, Amazon EMR, is a cluster-based processing service. While EMR jobs can be part of a workflow, EMR itself does not provide task orchestration or retries. Managing dependencies and triggering downstream tasks would require additional tooling or manual scripting.

Option D, AWS Data Pipeline, was designed for workflow orchestration but is older, less flexible, and not serverless. It requires setup, management, and often additional infrastructure, making it less practical than Step Functions for modern ETL orchestration.

Step Functions provides a visual, serverless, and reliable orchestration layer for coordinating multiple jobs with retries, branching, and event-driven triggers. It reduces operational overhead, increases reliability, and integrates seamlessly with modern AWS analytics services. Alternative options either lack orchestration capabilities, require more management, or are focused on data processing rather than workflow management.

Question 16:

You are designing a data lake on AWS that will store structured and unstructured data. You want to automatically discover and catalog new datasets to make them queryable by Athena and Redshift Spectrum. Which service should you implement?

A) AWS Glue
B) Amazon EMR
C) Amazon RDS
D) Amazon Redshift

Answer: A) AWS Glue

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Glue, is the ideal solution for automatically discovering and cataloging datasets. Glue provides a crawler that can scan data stored in S3, infer schema, and populate the Glue Data Catalog, which acts as a central metadata repository. Once datasets are cataloged, they become easily queryable via Amazon Athena, Redshift Spectrum, and EMR. Glue also supports both structured and semi-structured formats such as CSV, JSON, Parquet, and ORC.

Option B, Amazon EMR, is a cluster-based data processing platform. While EMR can read and process data from S3, it does not automatically catalog metadata. Metadata must be manually maintained or integrated with Glue, which adds operational overhead. EMR is better suited for large-scale distributed processing or ETL workloads rather than automatic data discovery.

Option C, Amazon RDS, is a relational database service optimized for transactional workloads. RDS does not provide a data catalog, nor does it automatically crawl or register datasets stored externally. It is unsuitable for building a centralized data lake.

Option D, Amazon Redshift, is a data warehouse designed for structured data analytics. While Redshift Spectrum allows querying S3, Redshift alone does not provide automatic metadata discovery or schema inference. Without Glue, Redshift cannot automatically detect or catalog newly added datasets.

By implementing AWS Glue, you can simplify data lake management, automate ETL workflows, and enable serverless, query-ready access for analytics teams. Glue integrates with multiple AWS analytics services, reducing operational overhead, ensuring consistency, and enabling scalable analytics on heterogeneous datasets.

Question 17:

You want to monitor and analyze streaming application metrics in real-time and trigger alerts if thresholds are breached. Which AWS service combination should you implement?

A) Amazon CloudWatch and Amazon SNS
B) Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena
C) Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue
D) Amazon EMR and Amazon SQS

Answer: A) Amazon CloudWatch and Amazon SNS

Explanation 

Option A, CloudWatch with SNS, is the recommended solution for real-time monitoring and alerting. CloudWatch collects metrics, logs, and events from AWS services and custom applications. You can create alarms based on thresholds and trigger notifications through SNS, which can send emails, SMS, or invoke Lambda functions for automated remediation. This combination supports highly responsive monitoring and alerting with minimal latency.

Option B, S3 with Athena, is better suited for ad-hoc batch analysis rather than real-time monitoring. Data stored in S3 must first be cataloged (via Glue) and queried in Athena, which introduces significant latency, making it unsuitable for triggering immediate alerts.

Option C, Redshift with Glue, provides a data warehouse and ETL solution. While suitable for analytics, Redshift is not optimized for real-time event monitoring. Queries are batch-oriented and would not provide instantaneous alerting.

Option D, EMR with SQS, is primarily for distributed processing or message queuing. While EMR can process large datasets and SQS can store messages, this combination does not natively provide real-time metric evaluation or alerting. Implementing alerting would require additional orchestration and custom logic.

Using CloudWatch with SNS ensures scalable, real-time monitoring, automated notifications, and easy integration with other AWS services. It is fully managed, cost-effective, and requires minimal operational effort, making it the best choice for real-time monitoring and alerting in AWS analytics pipelines.

Question 18:

You are building a serverless streaming pipeline for ingesting high-volume clickstream data. You want the data to be immediately queryable for analytics, without managing servers. Which service should you implement?

A) Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to Amazon S3
B) Amazon Kinesis Data Streams to Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon SQS to Amazon RDS
D) Amazon SNS to Amazon DynamoDB

Answer: A) Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to Amazon S3

Explanation 

Option A, Kinesis Data Firehose delivering to S3, is a fully managed serverless solution for streaming ingestion. Firehose can batch, compress, and transform data on the fly using AWS Lambda. Once data lands in S3, it becomes immediately queryable via Athena or Redshift Spectrum. Firehose automatically scales with incoming data and handles retries, eliminating the need for infrastructure management.

Option B, Kinesis Data Streams to Redshift, allows real-time ingestion but requires additional processing to load data into Redshift. Redshift ingestion is not truly serverless and can incur latency due to batch loading. This makes it less ideal for immediate analytics.

Option C, SQS to RDS, is not suitable for streaming analytics. SQS is a message queue, and RDS is an OLTP database. They do not support high-throughput ingestion, real-time querying, or scalable serverless architecture for analytics workloads.

Option D, SNS to DynamoDB, is also less appropriate. SNS is a pub/sub messaging service, and while DynamoDB can store high-velocity data, it does not natively support analytics queries like SQL. Additional ETL or processing layers would be required, increasing complexity.

Using Kinesis Data Firehose to S3 provides a scalable, serverless ingestion pipeline with immediate query access for analytics, cost-effective storage, and seamless integration with Athena and Redshift Spectrum. This combination represents a best-practice architecture for streaming analytics on AWS.

Question 19:

You want to automate the movement of data between S3, Redshift, and EMR, including retries, scheduling, and dependency management. Which AWS service is most appropriate?

A) AWS Step Functions
B) AWS Glue
C) Amazon Data Pipeline
D) Amazon Athena

Answer: A) AWS Step Functions

Explanation 

Option A, AWS Step Functions, is a serverless orchestration service that enables reliable workflow management across multiple services. Step Functions supports sequencing tasks, branching, error handling, retries, and event triggers. You can integrate it with Glue, EMR, Redshift, and Lambda, providing centralized control for complex ETL and analytics workflows.

Option B, AWS Glue, is primarily an ETL service. Glue workflows can chain jobs but are not as flexible as Step Functions for managing complex dependencies, retries, or conditional logic. Glue is best used for transformations, not general workflow orchestration.

Option C, Amazon Data Pipeline, is an older service for moving and transforming data between AWS services. While it can orchestrate workflows, it is not fully serverless, requires more setup, and lacks the modern features of Step Functions, such as visual workflow design and robust error handling.

Option D, Amazon Athena, is a query engine for S3. While powerful for analytics, Athena does not orchestrate workflows, manage dependencies, or automate multi-step ETL jobs. It is unsuitable for managing a complete workflow across multiple services.

Step Functions provides a flexible, serverless, and reliable orchestration solution, reducing operational complexity and ensuring that ETL and analytics workflows execute in a controlled, repeatable, and error-resilient manner. Alternatives like Glue, Data Pipeline, and Athena either lack orchestration capabilities or are designed for other purposes.

Question 20:

You want to build a cost-efficient, scalable analytics solution for historical and streaming data in a central data lake. You need to support ad-hoc queries, dashboards, and machine learning workflows. Which combination of AWS services is best?

A) Amazon S3, AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and Amazon SageMaker
B) Amazon RDS, Amazon EMR, and Amazon Redshift
C) Amazon DynamoDB, Kinesis Data Streams, and Redshift
D) Amazon SNS, Amazon SQS, and RDS

Answer: A) Amazon S3, AWS Glue, Amazon Athena, and Amazon SageMaker

Explanation 

Option A provides a modern, serverless, scalable analytics architecture. Amazon S3 serves as a central data lake for raw and processed data, supporting both structured and unstructured formats. AWS Glue provides ETL and data cataloging, enabling schema inference, metadata management, and transformation workflows. Athena allows ad-hoc SQL queries on S3 without provisioning infrastructure, making it cost-effective and scalable. Amazon SageMaker integrates with the data lake, enabling machine learning workflows on historical or streaming data.

Option B, RDS, EMR, and Redshift, is suitable for batch processing or warehouse analytics but requires provisioning clusters, scaling resources, and managing storage, increasing operational overhead and cost. It also lacks the serverless flexibility for ad-hoc queries on large unstructured datasets.

Option C, DynamoDB, Kinesis Data Streams, and Redshift, provides real-time ingestion and key-value storage but is less suited for historical data analytics and ad-hoc queries. DynamoDB is not optimized for analytics; Redshift requires loading and managing data. This architecture also introduces higher cost and operational overhead.

Option D, SNS, SQS, and RDS are oriented toward messaging and transactional workloads rather than analytics. SNS and SQS can handle event-driven ingestion, and RDS stores structured data, but this combination cannot provide scalable, ad-hoc query capabilities or integration with ML workflows.

Option A provides a serverless, cost-efficient, and scalable solution for a modern analytics architecture. It allows centralized data storage, transformation, querying, and integration with machine learning, making it the best practice for a full-featured data lake architecture on AWS.