Microsoft SC-300  Microsoft Identity and Access Administrator Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions Set 4 Q61-80

Visit here for our full Microsoft SC-300 exam dumps and practice test questions.

Question 61:

Your organization wants to automatically block sign-ins from users flagged as high-risk by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy blocking high-risk users
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy blocking high-risk users

Explanation 

Azure AD Identity Protection uses risk detection algorithms to identify compromised or potentially compromised accounts. Users can be flagged as high-risk due to unusual sign-ins, malware, or leaked credentials.

Option A) is correct because a Conditional Access policy can:

Target high-risk users identified by Azure AD Identity Protection.

Automatically block access or require remediation actions like password reset.

Provide audit logs for monitoring and compliance.

Integrate with MFA or other access controls for additional security.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot selectively block high-risk users.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not handle risk-based blocking.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce risk-based blocking.

Benefits:

Proactively mitigates account compromise.

Reduces risk exposure by automatically blocking risky sign-ins.

Provides audit logs for compliance and incident response.

For example, consider a scenario where a user attempts to sign in from a location that is flagged as suspicious or unusual based on prior login patterns. Azure AD Identity Protection evaluates the sign-in risk and classifies it as high. In this situation, a Conditional Access policy automatically blocks access, preventing the user from reaching organizational resources. To regain access, the user is required to reset their password and complete Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). This ensures that any potential account compromise is mitigated before the user can access sensitive data, protecting the organization from unauthorized activity and reducing the risk of breaches caused by credential theft or malicious actors.

In conclusion, implementing a Conditional Access policy that blocks high-risk users is the recommended approach for securing accounts flagged by Azure AD Identity Protection. This method provides an automated, risk-aware defense that evaluates contextual signals—such as sign-in location, device compliance, and behavioral anomalies—to determine whether access should be allowed. By combining risk-based detection with enforced remediation steps like password reset and MFA, organizations can proactively prevent unauthorized access while maintaining accountability and auditability. This approach aligns with zero-trust principles by continuously validating each access attempt based on risk, rather than relying solely on static credentials. Overall, Conditional Access policies targeting high-risk users enhance security posture, protect sensitive resources, and ensure that compromised accounts are remediated promptly before they can be exploited.

Question 62:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA for all privileged roles in Azure AD regardless of device or location. Which solution should you implement?

A) Security Defaults
B) Conditional Access policy
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Security Defaults

Explanation 

Security Defaults is a pre-configured set of security policies in Azure AD designed to enforce baseline protections, including mandatory MFA for all privileged accounts.

Option A) is correct because Security Defaults automatically:

Enforces MFA for all administrative roles.

Blocks legacy authentication for privileged accounts.

Protects against brute-force attacks and credential compromise.

Requires no additional configuration, providing baseline security out-of-the-box.

Option B), Conditional Access, can enforce MFA but requires manual configuration for each policy. Security Defaults provides automatic enforcement without complex setup.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce MFA for internal admins.

Benefits:

Simplifies baseline security setup for organizations.

Ensures privileged accounts are protected against compromise.

Provides audit logs for monitoring.

For example, in an organization using Azure AD, all Global Administrators are required to perform Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) before signing in, regardless of the device they are using or their geographic location. This means that even if an administrator is logging in from a corporate-managed laptop in a trusted location, they must complete an additional verification step, such as approving a push notification, entering a one-time code, or using a hardware token. By enforcing MFA for all privileged accounts, the organization significantly reduces the risk of account compromise, as attackers cannot gain access with just stolen credentials. This consistent enforcement ensures that high-privilege roles are always protected, providing a strong security baseline for critical administrative operations.

In conclusion, enabling Security Defaults in Azure AD is the recommended approach to efficiently enforce MFA for all privileged roles. Security Defaults automatically applies strong security measures, including MFA for administrative accounts, without requiring complex policy configuration. This ensures that every organization, regardless of size or administrative expertise, benefits from essential protections against common attack vectors such as phishing and credential theft. By mandating MFA for all Global Administrators and other high-privilege roles, Security Defaults provides a simple yet effective mechanism to safeguard sensitive resources, enforce zero-trust principles, and reduce the potential impact of compromised accounts. Overall, Security Defaults offers a streamlined, reliable, and enforceable method to protect privileged identities across the organization.

Question 63:

Your organization wants to ensure that only devices enrolled in Intune can access Microsoft 365 apps. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies allow device-based access control, ensuring only Intune-managed and compliant devices access corporate resources. This reduces risk from unmanaged or untrusted devices.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply policies to Microsoft 365 apps.

Require devices to meet Intune compliance standards such as encryption, antivirus, or OS updates.

Audit access attempts for monitoring and compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but does not enforce device compliance.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce device-based restrictions.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce device compliance for internal users.

Benefits:

Reduces risk of data exposure from unmanaged devices: By enforcing device compliance, only devices that meet organizational security standards can access corporate resources, minimizing the likelihood of sensitive data being exposed through personal or unprotected devices.

Ensures corporate compliance policies are enforced consistently: Conditional Access policies provide a centralized mechanism to enforce security standards such as device enrollment, encryption, and patching, ensuring all users adhere to corporate policies before accessing Microsoft 365 applications.

Supports auditing and reporting requirements: Device compliance enforcement generates logs and reports that demonstrate adherence to security policies, aiding regulatory compliance and providing visibility into device access activity.

Example: For instance, when a user attempts to access SharePoint Online from a personal laptop that is not enrolled in Intune, the Conditional Access policy blocks access. The user must first enroll their device in Intune and ensure it meets the compliance requirements, such as having updated security patches and encryption enabled. Only after these conditions are satisfied can access to SharePoint Online be granted, ensuring secure and policy-compliant access.

In conclusion, implementing a Conditional Access policy that requires device compliance is the recommended solution for securing Microsoft 365 access. It enforces organizational security standards, mitigates the risk of data leakage from unmanaged or non-compliant devices, and provides the necessary auditability for regulatory and operational oversight. By combining device compliance checks with access controls, organizations can maintain a secure, consistent, and manageable environment for Microsoft 365 users.

Question 64:

Your company wants to enforce MFA for external guests accessing SharePoint Online. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA

Explanation 

Guest users in Azure AD B2B collaboration can introduce security risks. Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce MFA specifically for guest users, ensuring secure access to sensitive SharePoint data.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target guest users.

Apply policies to specific apps like SharePoint Online.

Require MFA before access.

Audit guest activity for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally but cannot selectively target guest users.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce MFA for guests.

Option D), PIM, manages privileged roles but does not apply to guest access.

Benefits:

Secures external collaboration: By enforcing authentication requirements specifically for guest users, organizations can safely collaborate with external partners, contractors, and vendors without compromising internal resources.

Reduces risk of unauthorized access: Requiring Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) ensures that even if an external user’s credentials are compromised, unauthorized parties cannot gain access to sensitive data.

Provides compliance and auditability: Conditional Access policies generate logs and reports for guest access, helping organizations meet regulatory requirements and maintain visibility into who accessed what resources and when.

Example: For instance, when an external consultant attempts to access a SharePoint library, the Conditional Access policy requires the user to complete MFA. The consultant must verify their identity using a secondary authentication method, such as a mobile authenticator or one-time code, before access is granted. This ensures that only verified external users can access the resource, protecting sensitive organizational data while enabling necessary collaboration.

In conclusion, implementing a Conditional Access policy that targets guest users and requires MFA is the recommended approach for securing external SharePoint access. This policy enforces adaptive security for external collaborators, mitigates the risk of unauthorized access, and supports compliance and auditing needs, all while maintaining a controlled and manageable collaboration environment.

Question 65:

Your organization wants to ensure that only compliant devices can access Exchange Online and OneDrive. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance

Explanation 

Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce device compliance requirements to protect sensitive cloud resources. Only devices meeting Intune compliance policies can access Exchange Online and OneDrive.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply policies to Exchange Online and OneDrive.

Require devices to be compliant with Intune policies.

Monitor and audit access attempts for compliance reporting.

Option B, Security Defaults, provides a baseline security configuration for Azure AD tenants, including the enforcement of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for all users. While Security Defaults is useful for protecting identities against basic credential-based attacks, it does not allow organizations to enforce device-specific policies. This means that even if MFA is enabled, users could potentially access sensitive corporate resources from unmanaged or non-compliant devices, increasing the risk of data leakage. Similarly, option C, Pass-through Authentication, focuses on validating user credentials against on-premises directories and provides seamless single sign-on capabilities. However, it lacks the capability to enforce conditional, device-based access controls, leaving endpoints unverified and potentially insecure. Option D, Azure AD B2B collaboration, enables secure collaboration with external partners and guest users, but it primarily governs guest account management and access rights. It does not provide mechanisms to enforce compliance on internal devices, which are critical for protecting corporate data and maintaining adherence to regulatory requirements.

By contrast, a Conditional Access policy that enforces device compliance addresses these gaps. Device compliance ensures that only endpoints meeting organizational security standards—such as being enrolled in Intune, having up-to-date operating systems, enabled encryption, and active endpoint protection—can access corporate resources. This approach significantly reduces the risk of data leakage, as unmanaged or non-compliant devices are prevented from accessing sensitive cloud applications like OneDrive, SharePoint Online, or Teams. Furthermore, Conditional Access allows policies to be granularly targeted, meaning they can apply to specific users, groups, or applications, creating a balance between security and usability. Employees using compliant corporate devices can access resources seamlessly without unnecessary authentication friction, while access from risky endpoints is blocked until compliance criteria are met.

The benefits of enforcing device compliance through Conditional Access are multi-fold. First, it reduces the risk of data leakage from untrusted devices, as only verified endpoints are permitted to connect. This is critical for organizations handling sensitive or regulated data, including intellectual property, financial records, or personal information protected under GDPR, HIPAA, or other compliance frameworks. Second, it ensures consistent enforcement of compliance policies across the organization. By using Intune or other device management solutions, administrators can centrally define security configurations, patching requirements, and device health criteria, which are automatically verified during each access attempt. This eliminates reliance on manual processes or user adherence and reduces the possibility of human error compromising security. Third, it supports auditing and regulatory compliance. Conditional Access generates logs of access attempts, including whether devices were compliant, blocked, or granted access. These logs provide organizations with the necessary evidence to demonstrate adherence to internal policies and regulatory mandates, facilitating audits and risk assessments.

For example, consider a scenario where a user attempts to access OneDrive from a personal laptop that is not enrolled in Intune or lacks compliance settings. The Conditional Access policy immediately blocks the attempt and notifies the user that device enrollment is required. The user then enrolls the device in Intune, ensures it meets compliance standards, and retries access. Only after the device passes all compliance checks is access granted. This workflow guarantees that all devices accessing sensitive corporate resources are secure, reducing the potential for accidental data exposure or malicious compromise.

Conditional Access policies enforcing device compliance also integrate seamlessly with other security measures, such as MFA, location-based restrictions, and risk-based access. This layered approach allows organizations to implement a zero-trust security model, which assumes that no device, user, or network is inherently trusted. Every access request is evaluated based on multiple factors, including device health, user risk profile, and network location, ensuring that security measures adapt dynamically to the current context.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance is the most effective method for ensuring that only trusted and secure devices can access sensitive cloud applications. Unlike Security Defaults, Pass-through Authentication, or B2B collaboration features, device compliance enforcement directly addresses the risk of data leakage from unmanaged endpoints, provides consistent application of security policies, and supports auditing and regulatory requirements. By combining device compliance with additional security layers, organizations can protect corporate data, maintain regulatory adherence, and provide a seamless, secure experience for users accessing cloud resources. This approach ensures a modern, adaptive, and scalable security posture that aligns with zero-trust principles and the growing need to secure remote and hybrid work environments.

Question 66:

Your organization wants to block sign-ins from legacy authentication protocols to improve security across all users. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy blocking legacy authentication

Explanation 

Legacy authentication protocols such as IMAP, POP3, and SMTP do not support modern security controls like MFA or Conditional Access. Attackers commonly exploit these protocols using stolen credentials. Blocking legacy authentication reduces exposure to these risks.

Option A) is correct because a Conditional Access policy allows administrators to:

Target all users or specific groups.

Block legacy authentication protocols while allowing modern authentication.

Apply MFA and compliance policies only to supported protocols.

Audit sign-ins and blocked attempts for compliance reporting.

Option B), Security Defaults, blocks legacy authentication only for privileged accounts and does not provide granular control for all users or applications.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce blocking legacy authentication protocols.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but cannot block legacy authentication for internal users.

Benefits of blocking legacy authentication:

Reduces the risk of credential compromise.

Encourages users to adopt modern authentication methods.

Provides audit logs for monitoring and compliance.

For example, consider a scenario where a user attempts to connect to Exchange Online using POP3, a legacy authentication protocol that does not support modern security features such as Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Conditional Access checks. In this case, a Conditional Access policy can be configured to block access via POP3 immediately. At the same time, users connecting through modern clients, such as Outlook with OAuth 2.0-based authentication, are allowed to proceed without interruption. This ensures that legitimate users can continue accessing their mail securely while preventing high-risk connections from legacy protocols that are more susceptible to credential compromise, phishing, and brute-force attacks.

Legacy authentication protocols, including POP3, IMAP, and SMTP Basic Authentication, present significant security risks because they do not enforce MFA, support conditional access, or provide granular session controls. Attackers often target these protocols to bypass strong authentication policies, leveraging stolen credentials to gain unauthorized access. By implementing a Conditional Access policy that blocks legacy authentication, organizations can proactively mitigate these risks while ensuring that modern, secure clients retain uninterrupted access.

In conclusion, enforcing a Conditional Access policy to block legacy authentication is the recommended approach for securing cloud resources and reducing exposure to security threats. This policy ensures that only modern, compliant authentication methods are used, minimizing the risk of account compromise. It aligns with zero-trust security principles by continuously validating the context of each sign-in attempt, applying stricter controls for unsupported protocols, and providing visibility into potentially risky access attempts. Overall, blocking legacy authentication strengthens the security posture of the organization, protects sensitive data, and ensures that users adopt secure access methods without disrupting legitimate workflows.

Question 67:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA for all guest users accessing Microsoft Teams. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA

Explanation 

Guest users accessing Microsoft Teams may have access to sensitive collaboration data. Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce MFA specifically for guest users, securing external access while minimizing friction for internal users.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target guest users in Azure AD B2B collaboration.

Apply the policy specifically to Microsoft Teams.

Require MFA before granting access.

Monitor and audit guest sign-ins for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally for risky sign-ins but cannot selectively target guest users.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA for guest users.

Option D), PIM, manages privileged roles but does not apply to guest access.

Benefits:

Secures sensitive Team collaboration for external users.

Reduces risk of unauthorized access or data leakage.

Provides audit trails for compliance reporting.

For example, an external consultant trying to access a Teams channel must complete MFA before gaining access. Without MFA, access is blocked.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA is the best practice for securing Teams collaboration with external users.

Question 68:

Your organization wants to enforce that only devices compliant with Intune policies can access Microsoft 365 applications from unmanaged devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance

Explanation 

Conditional Access enables organizations to enforce device compliance requirements. By restricting access to compliant devices, organizations protect corporate data from unmanaged or untrusted devices.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or groups accessing Microsoft 365 apps.

Apply conditions for device state – compliant vs. unmanaged.

Require MFA if a device is unmanaged or enforce access only for compliant devices.

Audit all access attempts to monitor policy effectiveness.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot enforce device compliance.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce device compliance for access.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce compliance for internal devices.

Benefits:

Protects sensitive corporate data from untrusted devices.

Ensures consistent compliance enforcement across Microsoft 365 apps.

Supports auditing and regulatory compliance.

For example, a user trying to access SharePoint Online from a personal laptop will be blocked until the device is enrolled in Intune and compliant.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance is the recommended solution for secure access from unmanaged devices.

Question 69:

Your organization wants to require MFA for users accessing Microsoft 365 apps from high-risk countries. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location

Explanation 

Conditional Access supports adaptive MFA enforcement based on geographic location. Users signing in from high-risk countries are prompted for MFA, reducing risk while minimizing disruption for low-risk regions.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or groups.

Define location conditions, specifying high-risk countries or IP ranges.

Require MFA only when users sign in from these locations.

Audit sign-ins to track compliance and monitor unusual access.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot apply location-specific MFA policies.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA based on geographic location.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but cannot enforce location-based MFA for internal users.

Benefits:

Protects resources from high-risk sign-ins.

Reduces MFA prompts for trusted locations, improving usability.

Provides compliance audit trails.

For example, a user accessing Exchange Online from a country where the organization has no operations will be prompted for MFA, while users from corporate offices are not challenged.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location provides adaptive security for users in high-risk areas.

Question 70:

Your organization wants to require approval before granting temporary access to privileged roles. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Explanation 

Azure AD PIM enables just-in-time privileged access, ensuring that administrative roles are granted temporarily and require justification and optional approval before activation.

Option A) is correct because PIM allows administrators to:

Require approval before activating privileged roles.

Set time-bound access to reduce standing privileges.

Require MFA and justification for activation.

Maintain audit logs of all activations for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but cannot manage temporary role activation or approval workflows.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot manage privileged roles.

Option D), Conditional Access, enforces access conditions but does not manage role activation or approvals.

Benefits:

Reduces risk from standing administrative privileges.

Supports least-privilege principles.

Provides audit trails for compliance and security reviews.

For example, a user requesting temporary Global Administrator access must provide justification and receive approval. PIM grants access for a limited duration, automatically revoking it afterward.

In conclusion, Azure AD PIM is the recommended solution for temporary, approved access to privileged roles.

Question 71:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA for all users when accessing cloud applications from unmanaged devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices

Explanation 

Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce adaptive security policies based on device management state. By requiring MFA for unmanaged devices, organizations protect corporate data while maintaining usability for trusted, compliant devices.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply conditions based on device state, such as unmanaged or non-compliant devices.

Require MFA for access to cloud applications from these devices.

Audit all access attempts and MFA prompts for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot distinguish between managed and unmanaged devices.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce device-based MFA policies.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but cannot enforce MFA for internal users based on device state.

Benefits include:

Protects sensitive corporate resources from untrusted devices.

Supports regulatory compliance and auditing requirements.

Reduces friction for users on compliant, corporate-managed devices.

For example, a user attempting to access SharePoint Online from a personal laptop will be prompted for MFA, whereas a corporate-managed laptop can access the application without additional prompts.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices ensures secure access while maintaining usability.

Question 72:

Your organization wants to require MFA for all privileged roles in Azure AD regardless of location or device. Which solution should you implement?

A) Security Defaults
B) Conditional Access policy
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Security Defaults

Explanation 

Security Defaults provides a pre-configured set of baseline security protections in Azure AD, including mandatory MFA for all administrative roles. It is designed for organizations seeking default security without complex configuration.

Option A) is correct because Security Defaults automatically:

Enforces MFA for all privileged accounts.

Blocks legacy authentication for privileged accounts.

Protects against brute-force attacks and common credential compromise scenarios.

Requires no additional configuration, providing out-of-the-box security.

Option B), Conditional Access, can also enforce MFA, but it requires manual creation and configuration of policies. Security Defaults simplifies deployment.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce MFA for internal privileged roles.

Benefits:

Simplifies baseline security setup.

Protects administrative accounts from compromise.

Provides audit logs for compliance and security monitoring.

For example, all Global Administrators will be required to perform MFA before accessing Azure AD, regardless of device or network location.

In conclusion, Security Defaults is the recommended solution for enforcing MFA on privileged roles with minimal configuration.

Question 73:

Your organization wants to ensure guest users’ access is periodically reviewed and unnecessary access is removed automatically. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Access Reviews
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Access Reviews

Explanation 

Azure AD Access Reviews allow organizations to regularly assess user access, including external guest accounts, ensuring that access remains appropriate over time. This reduces the risk of over-privileged accounts.

Option A) is correct because Access Reviews enable administrators to:

Schedule periodic reviews for guest users.

Assign reviewers (e.g., managers or resource owners) to approve or remove access.

Automate actions, such as removing inactive or unnecessary guest accounts.

Maintain audit logs of review outcomes for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but does not provide periodic access review capabilities.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot monitor or review access over time.

Option D), Conditional Access, controls access based on conditions but does not automate periodic access reviews.

Benefits:

Reduces risk of guest users retaining unnecessary access.

Supports regulatory and internal compliance requirements.

Minimizes administrative overhead through automation.

For example, a consultant who no longer requires access to SharePoint will be flagged during the Access Review. Their access is then automatically revoked, improving security.

In conclusion, Azure AD Access Reviews is the recommended solution for managing and auditing guest user access.

Question 74:

Your organization wants to require MFA for all users signing in from high-risk countries. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location

Explanation 

Conditional Access allows organizations to enforce adaptive MFA based on sign-in location. Users signing in from high-risk countries are prompted for MFA, reducing risk while minimizing unnecessary prompts for trusted regions.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Define location-based conditions, specifying high-risk countries or IP ranges.

Require MFA for users signing in from these locations.

Audit sign-ins to track compliance and unusual activity.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot apply location-specific MFA policies.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce location-based MFA.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce location-based MFA for internal users.

Benefits:

Reduces exposure to high-risk sign-ins.

Enhances usability by not challenging trusted locations.

Supports audit and compliance reporting.

For example, a user accessing Exchange Online from a high-risk country is prompted for MFA, while a sign-in from a corporate office proceeds without extra verification.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA based on location provides adaptive security and reduces risk from high-risk regions.

Question 75:

Your organization wants to require temporary, just-in-time activation of privileged roles with approval. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Explanation 

Azure AD PIM enables just-in-time privileged access, reducing standing administrative privileges and supporting least-privilege principles. PIM allows temporary role activation with optional approval and justification.

Option A) is correct because PIM provides:

Time-bound role activation for privileged accounts.

Requirement for approval before role activation.

Optional justification for activation.

Detailed audit logs for compliance and monitoring.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but cannot manage temporary or approved role activations.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not manage privileged roles.

Option D), Conditional Access, enforces access conditions but cannot manage role activation workflows.

Benefits:

Reduces risk from misuse of administrative privileges.

Supports least-privilege access policies.

Provides audit trails for security and compliance purposes.

For example, a user requests temporary Global Administrator access to perform maintenance. PIM requires approval and justification. Access is granted for a limited duration and automatically removed afterward.

In conclusion, Azure AD PIM is the recommended solution for temporary, approved access to privileged roles.

Question 76:

Your organization wants to enforce that only devices compliant with Intune policies can access Microsoft Teams and SharePoint Online. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies provide adaptive security based on device compliance. Organizations can restrict access to cloud applications like Teams and SharePoint to only devices that meet Intune compliance policies.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Apply policies to specific applications such as Microsoft Teams and SharePoint Online.

Require devices to meet Intune compliance standards including encryption, antivirus, and OS updates.

Monitor and audit access attempts for compliance and security reporting.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot enforce device compliance for specific applications.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce device compliance.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce device compliance for internal users.

Benefits:

Protects sensitive data from untrusted devices.

Ensures consistent enforcement of corporate compliance policies.

Supports auditing and regulatory compliance.

For example, a user attempting to access Teams from a personal laptop will be blocked until the device is enrolled in Intune and compliant.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring device compliance is the recommended solution for securing Microsoft Teams and SharePoint Online.

Question 77:

Your company wants to enforce MFA for guest users accessing Microsoft 365 apps. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA

Explanation 

Guest users accessing Microsoft 365 apps may pose security risks. Conditional Access allows organizations to require MFA specifically for guest accounts, ensuring secure access without impacting internal users.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target guest users in Azure AD B2B collaboration.

Apply policies to specific applications, such as SharePoint Online, Teams, or OneDrive.

Require MFA before granting access.

Audit guest activity for compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally for admins and risky sign-ins but cannot selectively target guest users.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not enforce MFA for guests.

Option D), PIM, manages privileged roles but does not apply to guest access.

Benefits:

Secures collaboration with external users.

Reduces risk of unauthorized access or data exposure.

Provides audit logs for compliance reporting.

For example, an external consultant trying to access SharePoint must complete MFA before gaining access.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy targeting guest users requiring MFA is the recommended solution for secure external collaboration.

Question 78:

Your organization wants to block sign-ins from high-risk users detected by Azure AD Identity Protection. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy blocking high-risk users
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy blocking high-risk users

Explanation 

Azure AD Identity Protection identifies users flagged as high-risk due to suspicious sign-ins or potential compromise. Blocking these users automatically improves security posture.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target users flagged as high-risk by Identity Protection.

Automatically block access or require remediation such as password reset.

Integrate with MFA or other Conditional Access controls for enhanced security.

Maintain audit logs for monitoring and compliance.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but cannot block users based on risk levels.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce risk-based blocking.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest accounts but cannot block high-risk internal users.

Benefits:

Prevents potentially compromised accounts from accessing corporate resources.

Provides automated mitigation to reduce risk exposure.

Supports audit and compliance reporting.

For example, a user flagged as high-risk due to unusual sign-in locations will be blocked from accessing Microsoft 365 apps until remediation steps are completed.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy blocking high-risk users is the recommended solution to proactively secure accounts flagged by Identity Protection.

Question 79:

Your organization wants to enforce that privileged roles are only activated temporarily and require approval with justification. Which solution should you implement?

A) Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Conditional Access policy

Answer: A) – Azure AD Privileged Identity Management (PIM)

Explanation 

Privileged Identity Management (PIM) provides just-in-time access to privileged roles, reducing standing administrative privileges and supporting least-privilege principles. It allows temporary activation with approval and justification.

Option A) is correct because PIM enables administrators to:

Set time-bound access for privileged roles.

Require approval before role activation.

Require justification for activation.

Maintain detailed audit logs for compliance and security monitoring.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA but cannot manage temporary activation of roles.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but does not manage privileged roles.

Option D), Conditional Access, enforces access policies but cannot implement approval workflows for privileged roles.

Benefits:

Reduces security risks associated with permanent administrative access.

Supports least-privilege access principles.

Provides audit trails for compliance reporting.

For example, a user requesting temporary Global Administrator access must provide justification and receive approval. The access is automatically revoked after the defined time.

In conclusion, Azure AD PIM is the recommended solution for managing temporary, approved privileged access.

Question 80:

Your organization wants to enforce MFA for all users accessing Microsoft 365 applications from unmanaged devices. Which solution should you implement?

A) Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices
B) Security Defaults
C) Pass-through Authentication
D) Azure AD B2B collaboration

Answer: A) – Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices

Explanation 

Conditional Access policies allow adaptive MFA enforcement based on device state. By requiring MFA for unmanaged devices, organizations protect sensitive resources without impacting trusted devices.

Option A) is correct because administrators can:

Target all users or specific groups.

Define conditions based on device compliance, requiring MFA for unmanaged or non-compliant devices.

Audit all MFA prompts and access attempts for security and compliance.

Integrate MFA with other access controls for additional security.

Option B), Security Defaults, enforces MFA globally for risky sign-ins but cannot distinguish managed vs. unmanaged devices.

Option C), Pass-through Authentication, validates credentials but cannot enforce device-based MFA.

Option D), Azure AD B2B collaboration, manages guest access but does not enforce MFA based on device state.

Benefits:

Protects corporate resources from access by untrusted devices.

Supports compliance and auditing requirements.

Reduces user friction for managed devices while enforcing security on unmanaged devices.

For example, a user attempting to access SharePoint Online from a personal laptop is prompted for MFA, while a corporate-managed device can access without additional verification.

In conclusion, a Conditional Access policy requiring MFA for unmanaged devices is the recommended solution for secure access to Microsoft 365 applications.