• Home
• BACB Exams
• BCBA - Board Certified Behavior Analyst

BCBA BACB Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question 1
When a behavior analyst performs multiple tests of her treatment before officially documenting it in a formal behavior program, which core assumption of behavior analysis is she following?

A. Determinism
B. Law of parsimony
C. Empiricism
D. None of the above

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

This question focuses on identifying which foundational principle of behavior analysis is demonstrated when a practitioner systematically tests an intervention before formally implementing or recording it. The scenario describes a behavior analyst who performs several tests of her treatment plan. This indicates she is relying on observation and experience—rather than assumptions or theoretical reasoning—before finalizing her program. Let’s examine the options to determine which principle this reflects most accurately.

Option A, determinism, is the belief that the universe is a lawful and orderly place in which phenomena occur as a result of other events. In other words, behavior doesn’t occur randomly but as a consequence of identifiable factors. While determinism is indeed a foundational assumption in behavior analysis, it does not directly relate to how the analyst tests or validates her treatment through direct observation. It is more about the underlying belief that behavior is predictable and governed by cause-and-effect relationships.

Option B, the law of parsimony, states that when faced with competing explanations for a phenomenon, one should select the simplest explanation that still accounts for all the facts. Although this principle influences how explanations for behavior are selected, it does not directly account for the act of conducting multiple tests to validate the treatment. Parsimony would come into play when analyzing data or choosing between potential interventions, not during the empirical testing process itself.

Option C, empiricism, refers to the practice of objective observation and measurement of phenomena of interest. It emphasizes data collection through experience, experimentation, and sensory evidence, rather than through theory or speculation. The behavior analyst’s act of conducting multiple tests of her treatment aligns directly with this principle. She is gathering data from real-life tests, making observations, and using this information to refine her program. This is a textbook example of empiricism in action.

Option D, none of the above, is incorrect because one of the principles—specifically, empiricism—clearly fits the described behavior.

Therefore, the analyst’s repeated testing and reliance on observed outcomes before finalizing her behavior plan demonstrate a commitment to empiricism, which is central to evidence-based practices in behavior analysis. This approach ensures that interventions are not based on assumptions or tradition, but on tested and verifiable results.

Question 2
When a researcher gives a full and detailed account of their procedures in a behavior analytic study focused on classroom management techniques, which dimension of behavior analysis are they demonstrating?

A. Conceptually systematic
B. Applied
C. Technological
D. Analytic

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

This question asks which dimension of behavior analysis is reflected when a practitioner or researcher offers a complete description of the procedures used in a study. Each of the seven dimensions of behavior analysis, outlined by Baer, Wolf, and Risley (1968), plays a distinct role in ensuring the quality, rigor, and utility of behavior-analytic work. Let’s break down each option and see which best fits the behavior described in the question.

Option A, conceptually systematic, refers to the requirement that procedures and interpretations used in behavior analysis should be grounded in the basic principles of behavior. A conceptually systematic approach ensures that behavior analysts don't just apply interventions because they work but also because they are tied directly to the theoretical and empirical foundations of the science. While this is an essential dimension, it doesn't emphasize detailed procedural descriptions—so it's not the best match for the situation described.

Option B, applied, focuses on the relevance of the behavior being studied to real-life concerns—typically behaviors that are socially significant. For example, reducing classroom disruptions or increasing engagement would fall under applied work. Although the scenario is about classroom management (which is applied content), the question is not about the type of behavior but about the documentation and description of procedures. Therefore, "applied" is not the most accurate answer.

Option C, technological, is the dimension that directly matches the scenario. A behavior-analytic study is considered technological when all procedures are described in sufficient detail and clarity that another practitioner could replicate them with fidelity. This dimension emphasizes transparency and reproducibility. Providing a complete description of procedures, as mentioned in the question, is the hallmark of the technological dimension. This ensures that others can replicate the study and achieve similar results—an essential part of scientific rigor.

Option D, analytic, refers to the demonstration of a functional relationship between behavior and the environment. A study is analytic when the researcher can show that the behavior changes because of the intervention and not due to some uncontrolled factor. This is about experimental control and data interpretation, not about how thoroughly procedures are described.

So, while several dimensions of behavior analysis are crucial in different contexts, the one specifically connected to providing a complete, detailed, and replicable description of procedures is the technological dimension.

Question 3
When a behavior analyst explains the procedures of a behavior program using the foundational principles of behavior analysis, which dimension of behavior analysis is being demonstrated?

A. Conceptually systematic
B. Applied
C. Technological
D. Analytic

Correct Answer: A

Explanation:

This question focuses on identifying the specific dimension of behavior analysis that involves aligning procedural descriptions with the foundational principles of the field. The scenario involves a behavior analyst who is explicitly grounding their intervention in the basic principles of behavior—such as reinforcement, punishment, stimulus control, and motivating operations. Let’s evaluate each of the answer choices to determine the most appropriate one.

Option A, conceptually systematic, is the most accurate and relevant dimension here. This dimension ensures that all procedures and strategies used in behavior analysis are not just effective, but also consistent with the underlying behavioral principles. When interventions are conceptually systematic, they are explained in terms of established theories—like operant or respondent conditioning. This dimension helps promote clarity, theoretical coherence, and scientific advancement by ensuring that applied procedures are grounded in the core concepts of behaviorism. So, when a behavior analyst describes their procedures using principles such as positive reinforcement, extinction, or stimulus control, they are being conceptually systematic.

Option B, applied, refers to focusing on socially significant behavior—that is, behavior that is important and meaningful to the client and their environment. Applied behavior analysis must always address real-world issues that have value to the individual. While describing procedures in a conceptually systematic way may often be part of applied work, simply being applied does not require explanation in terms of behavior principles. Therefore, "applied" is not the best fit for what the question is asking.

Option C, technological, refers to the clarity and completeness of procedural descriptions so that they can be reliably replicated. A technological approach ensures that someone reading a behavior plan can follow the exact steps and produce similar outcomes. While closely related to how procedures are written, it does not require that those procedures be connected to behavioral theory or principles. So, technological is about replicability, not theoretical alignment.

Option D, analytic, relates to demonstrating a functional relationship between an intervention and a change in behavior. The analyst must show through data that it was the treatment—not chance—that caused the behavioral improvement. The analytic dimension is more about establishing experimental control, not about how procedures are described or whether they’re grounded in theory.

In conclusion, the dimension that specifically requires procedures to be tied to behavior analytic theory and core principles is conceptually systematic. This dimension strengthens the scientific integrity of behavior analysis and ensures that interventions are not only effective but also logically and theoretically consistent with the discipline’s foundations.

Question 4
A behavior analyst responds to a question about why a behavior occurred by saying it “came out of nowhere.” Assuming he meant this literally, which fundamental assumption of behavior analysis is he violating?

A. Philosophical doubt
B. Determinism
C. Technological
D. Being conceptually systematic

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

This question addresses the core philosophical foundations of behavior analysis, particularly the assumptions that guide how analysts understand and interpret behavior. The statement that a behavior "came out of nowhere" implies that the behavior was spontaneous, without cause, or random. This contradicts a specific foundational belief within behavior analysis.

Option A, philosophical doubt, refers to the idea that behavior analysts should maintain a skeptical, questioning attitude, always looking to re-examine conclusions and be open to new evidence. While philosophical doubt encourages critical thinking and cautious interpretation, it is not directly about whether behavior has a cause. Therefore, while this principle might encourage someone to question the “came out of nowhere” claim, it is not the specific assumption being violated in this scenario.

Option B, determinism, is the correct answer. Determinism is the assumption that the universe is a lawful and orderly place, where all events, including behavior, occur as the result of other events. In behavior analysis, this means that all behavior has a cause—even if that cause is not immediately apparent. When a behavior analyst says that a behavior "came out of nowhere," and genuinely believes it, they are rejecting the deterministic worldview. They are implying that the behavior occurred without any environmental trigger or historical reason, which violates the assumption that all behavior is lawful and determined by specific variables.

Option C, technological, refers to the clarity and detail with which procedures are described so that others can replicate them. It has nothing to do with how one interprets or attributes cause to behavior, so this is not relevant to the scenario.

Option D, being conceptually systematic, means that behavior analytic procedures should be described and justified in terms of established principles of behavior. While this is important for designing and explaining interventions, it doesn’t directly address whether one believes that behavior is lawful or random. Therefore, this option is not the one being violated.

In summary, the behavior analyst’s comment reflects a belief that the behavior happened spontaneously, without cause. This contradicts the assumption of determinism, which is central to behavior analysis. Without determinism, the science of behavior would lack the foundational belief that behavior can be studied, predicted, and influenced through environmental variables.

Question 5
Which of the following choices is NOT considered one of the official dimensions of applied behavior analysis as outlined by Baer, Wolf, and Risley (1968)?

A. Effective
B. Technological
C. Applied
D. Empirical

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

This question tests your understanding of the seven dimensions of applied behavior analysis (ABA), which were introduced by Baer, Wolf, and Risley in their seminal 1968 paper. These dimensions serve as the defining features of ABA and help differentiate it from other disciplines or approaches to behavior change.

Let’s begin by reviewing the seven dimensions of ABA:

1. Applied – focuses on behaviors that are socially significant and important to the individual or society.

2. Behavioral – targets observable and measurable behavior.

3. Analytic – demonstrates a clear, functional relationship between intervention and behavior change.

4. Technological – procedures are written clearly and in enough detail that others can replicate them.

5. Conceptually Systematic – interventions are based on the principles of behavior.

6. Effective – interventions produce meaningful, significant improvements in behavior.

7. Generality – behavior change lasts over time, appears in other environments, and spreads to other behaviors.

Now, let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Effective
This is one of the seven official dimensions. It refers to the idea that interventions should result in meaningful improvements in behavior. If a program does not produce significant and socially valid changes, it is not considered effective, even if other dimensions are met.

Option B: Technological
This is also one of the official dimensions. A technological intervention is described in such clear detail that others can replicate it without needing to guess or infer any steps. This ensures transparency and reproducibility.

Option C: Applied
This is another official dimension. "Applied" refers to selecting goals and behaviors that are of importance to the individual or community, rather than academic or theoretical interests. It emphasizes social significance and practical benefit.

Option D: Empirical
While being empirical (based on observation and data) is a critical value in behavior analysis and science in general, "empirical" is not one of the seven named dimensions of ABA. It is closely related to several dimensions, such as analytic and behavioral, but it is not listed as one of the core dimensions in Baer, Wolf, and Risley’s framework.

Therefore, although being empirical is important and closely aligned with behavior analysis practices, it is not officially listed among the seven defining dimensions of applied behavior analysis.

Question 6
A behavior analyst records how long it takes for a client to respond with “You’re welcome” after a staff member says “Thank you.” What type of behavioral measurement is the analyst using?

A. Frequency
B. Duration
C. Inter-response time
D. Latency

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

This question focuses on identifying the correct type of temporal behavioral measurement based on the situation provided. The key detail is that the behavior analyst is measuring the time between the presentation of a prompt (“Thank you”) and the initiation of the target response (“You’re welcome”).

Let’s examine each of the response options to determine which one fits this situation best.

Option A: Frequency
Frequency refers to the number of times a behavior occurs within a given period of time. For example, if the client said “You’re welcome” ten times during a one-hour session, that would be a measure of frequency. However, frequency tells us how often a behavior happens, not how long it takes for it to start. Since this question is about the time between a prompt and the client’s response, frequency is not the right measurement.

Option B: Duration
Duration is the total length of time a behavior lasts from beginning to end. For instance, if a child screamed for 30 seconds, that 30 seconds would be the duration of the behavior. In the scenario given, the analyst is not interested in how long the response “You’re welcome” lasts, but rather how long it takes for the response to begin after a cue is given. Therefore, duration is also not correct.

Option C: Inter-response time (IRT)
Inter-response time measures the amount of time between two instances of the same behavior. For example, if a student claps, then claps again 5 seconds later, that 5-second gap is the inter-response time. In this scenario, we are not measuring time between two instances of the same behavior (e.g., saying “You’re welcome” twice), so IRT does not apply here either.

Option D: Latency
Latency is the amount of time between a given stimulus or prompt and the initiation of the response. In this question, the staff saying “Thank you” is the stimulus, and the client saying “You’re welcome” is the response. The time it takes for the client to start saying “You’re welcome” after hearing “Thank you” is exactly what latency measures. Therefore, latency is the correct type of measurement for this scenario.

To summarize, latency is used when we want to know how long it takes for a behavior to begin after an antecedent event. In behavior analysis, latency data helps practitioners assess the promptness or delay of a response, which can be critical when targeting improvements in social behavior, compliance, or response speed.

Question 7
What is likely the most appropriate way to measure the behavior of crying?

A. Frequency
B. Duration
C. Percentage
D. Latency

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

This question is asking which measurement system best fits a behavior like crying, which is typically defined by how long it continues once it begins. Choosing the correct measurement method in behavior analysis depends on the nature of the behavior—whether it is discrete or continuous, and whether timing, intensity, or count is the primary concern.

Let’s evaluate the options one by one.

Option A: Frequency
Frequency refers to how many times a behavior occurs. This is ideal for behaviors that are discrete and countable, such as hitting, clapping, or vocal tics—those that have a clear start and end point and occur in countable episodes. While crying can sometimes be broken into separate episodes, it is generally a continuous behavior that lasts for an extended time once it begins. Counting each crying episode may not provide a complete picture of how distressing or severe the behavior is. For example, crying once for 20 minutes is not equivalent in severity to crying five times for 10 seconds each. Therefore, frequency is not the best fit for measuring crying.

Option B: Duration
Duration refers to the total amount of time a behavior occurs. This measurement is best suited for behaviors that last over a period of time, such as tantrums, engagement in tasks, and, importantly, crying. When crying occurs, it often varies in how long it lasts, which makes duration the most sensitive and accurate way to capture its intensity and impact. Measuring how many minutes a client spends crying can provide useful data for tracking trends, assessing triggers, and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing emotional distress.

Option C: Percentage
Percentage is a derivative measure that involves calculating the proportion of opportunities in which a behavior occurs. For example, if a child follows instructions 8 out of 10 times, that’s 80% compliance. While percentages can be used for some behaviors—particularly when analyzing correct responses or compliance—they’re not particularly effective for ongoing emotional behaviors like crying. There is no natural denominator or “total opportunities” for crying in most cases, which makes percentage a poor fit.

Option D: Latency
Latency measures the time between a prompt or stimulus and the initiation of a behavior. For example, the time between a teacher’s instruction and a student starting the task. Crying is not typically preceded by a clearly defined external cue that can be consistently measured, and even when it is, the timing to start is usually not the focus. We care more about how long the crying lasts, not how quickly it starts after a specific event. Therefore, latency is also not the best choice.

In conclusion, while crying could technically be measured using several methods depending on the context, duration provides the most complete and meaningful data for ongoing, continuous behaviors like crying. It allows behavior analysts to evaluate not just whether crying occurs, but how intense or prolonged the behavior is, which is often more clinically relevant.

Question 8
When a behavior analyst says, “It took four attempts, but Johnny completed the puzzle,” what measurement system is being used?

A. Whole interval
B. Percent of occurrence
C. Trials to criterion
D. Frequency

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

This question asks you to identify the type of measurement being used when tracking how many attempts it took for a client to successfully complete a task. The statement focuses on the number of trials required before achieving a specific performance level, which is a key hint in determining the correct answer.

Let’s evaluate each option carefully:

Option A: Whole interval
Whole interval recording is a time sampling method used to measure whether a behavior occurred throughout an entire interval. It’s often used to record behaviors that are expected to occur continuously, such as staying on-task. This type of recording does not measure success across multiple trials, and it does not apply when the analyst is focused on how many attempts it took to reach a goal. So, this option is not correct.

Option B: Percent of occurrence
Percentage is a derivative measure that reflects the proportion of opportunities in which a behavior occurred correctly. For example, if a client followed directions 8 out of 10 times, that would be recorded as 80%. However, the question specifically states that the child completed the task after four attempts, which reflects the number of trials it took to reach a certain level of competence—not the percentage of correct responses. Therefore, this measure does not match the scenario.

Option C: Trials to criterion
This is the correct answer. Trials to criterion is a measurement method that records the number of responses or practice opportunities needed for a person to reach a predefined level of performance. In the given example, Johnny needed four attempts to successfully complete the puzzle, which clearly reflects how many trials were required before achieving success. This type of measurement is especially useful when assessing how quickly a person can acquire a new skill, as it directly ties progress to performance standards. It is commonly used in educational and therapeutic settings to track learning efficiency.

Option D: Frequency
Frequency refers to the count of how many times a behavior occurs. While it may seem similar to trials to criterion, frequency alone does not necessarily indicate whether a goal was achieved or how long it took to get there. For instance, frequency would only tell us how many times the child attempted the puzzle—not that it took four attempts to reach success. Thus, while frequency is a basic and useful measure, it doesn’t fully capture the context of performance being described here.

To summarize, when a behavior analyst notes how many tries or attempts were needed for a client to meet a learning objective or criterion, they are specifically using trials to criterion. This measure provides valuable data on how quickly or efficiently someone acquires a new behavior or skill and is particularly helpful in skill acquisition programs within applied behavior analysis.

Question 9
Jody engaged in a tantrum that lasted 14 minutes and began 3 seconds after being told "No." It had been 2 days since the last tantrum. What is the latency of this behavior?

A. Unknown
B. 2 days
C. 14 minutes
D. 3 seconds

Correct Answer: D

Explanation:

This question tests your understanding of the concept of latency in behavior analysis, specifically in relation to the timing of behavioral responses following a given stimulus or prompt. In this scenario, there are three time-related data points provided:

1. The tantrum lasted 14 minutes – this relates to duration.

2. The tantrum occurred 3 seconds after she was told "No" – this relates to latency.

3. It had been 2 days since the last tantrum – this would relate to inter-response time, not latency.

Let’s go through the definitions and each option to determine the correct one.

Option A: Unknown
This would only be correct if we did not have the necessary information to calculate latency. However, the question clearly states that the tantrum started 3 seconds after she was told “No.” Since this gives us an explicit measurement of the time between the antecedent (being told “No”) and the behavior (the tantrum), we do know the latency. Therefore, this answer is incorrect.

Option B: 2 days
Two days refers to the time between this tantrum and the previous one. In behavioral measurement, this is known as the inter-response time (IRT), not latency. IRT tracks the time between two occurrences of the same behavior, such as the time between two tantrums. While IRT is an important metric, it's not what we're being asked for here.

Option C: 14 minutes
Fourteen minutes refers to the duration of the tantrum—that is, how long the behavior lasted once it began. Duration is a different kind of temporal measurement. While useful in understanding the severity or intensity of a behavior, it does not indicate latency, which is focused solely on how quickly the behavior began after a specific stimulus.

Option D: 3 seconds
This is the correct answer. Latency is defined as the amount of time between the presentation of an antecedent stimulus and the initiation of a response. In this case, the antecedent is the verbal instruction “No,” and the behavior is the tantrum. Since the tantrum began 3 seconds after the instruction was given, the latency is clearly 3 seconds. This is exactly the definition and use of latency in behavior analysis: measuring how quickly a behavior is initiated following an environmental cue.

In practice, measuring latency can be very important for evaluating how effectively a person is responding to prompts, especially in areas such as task compliance, communication, or behavior reduction programs. For example, a decreasing latency to comply with instructions might indicate learning or behavioral improvement.

Question 10
Changing a student's seat in the classroom to reduce distractions from a window is an example of manipulating which type of variable?

A. Context variable
B. Antecedent variable
C. Confounding variable
D. Ecological variable

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

This question asks you to identify the type of variable that is being manipulated when a behavior analyst or teacher alters the environment before a behavior occurs—specifically, moving a student’s chair to avoid distraction. The key concept here is that the change is made prior to the behavior in order to influence how the student behaves, which strongly suggests the involvement of an antecedent.

Let’s analyze each option to determine which is the most accurate.

Option A: Context variable
A context variable refers to broader environmental or situational factors that surround behavior, such as classroom culture, instructional style, or peer influence. These are often indirect influences on behavior. While seating arrangement might play a role in context, this option is too broad and not specific enough for what is being described in the question. The question is about a deliberate manipulation, not just a background condition.

Option B: Antecedent variable
This is the correct answer. In behavior analysis, antecedent variables are environmental events or conditions that occur immediately before a behavior and influence its occurrence. By moving the student's seat to reduce distractions from the window, the teacher is altering the stimulus conditions that exist before the student engages in classroom behavior. The goal is to prevent or reduce off-task or distracted behavior by modifying something in the environment. This is a classic example of an antecedent intervention: changing the setting or stimuli in order to promote desirable behavior or decrease problematic behavior.

Option C: Confounding variable
Confounding variables are uncontrolled factors that can interfere with the interpretation of experimental results. They threaten the internal validity of a study by making it unclear whether observed changes in behavior were due to the independent variable or some other, uncontrolled influence. In the scenario provided, the change (moving the chair) is intentional and controlled, not something that’s muddying the results. Therefore, this is not the right choice.

Option D: Ecological variable
Ecological variables pertain to aspects of the physical or social environment—such as classroom size, lighting, seating arrangements, or peer proximity. Although the chair position may seem ecological in nature, the intentional manipulation of the seat position to influence behavior makes it more accurately described as an antecedent variable. Ecological variables are typically described when analyzing overall environmental structure, rather than specific manipulations designed to change behavior.

In summary, the teacher’s action—moving the chair to prevent distraction—reflects a deliberate change to the antecedent conditions affecting the student’s behavior. It is a proactive strategy aimed at preventing problem behavior by addressing stimuli that exist prior to the behavior. This aligns precisely with the definition of an antecedent variable.