• Home
• PMI Exams
• PMI-RMP - PMI Risk Management Professional

PMI-RMP PMI Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps

Question No 1:

What are typical methods used to express the likelihood and potential effects of risks during project management?

A. Risk checklist, risk assessment, regression analysis, and assumption and constraint analysis
B. Monitor Risks process, multi-dimensional risk assessment, control chart, and Monte Carlo simulation
C. Probability distributions, sensitivity analysis, modeling and simulation, and probability and impact matrix
D. Monitor Risks process, assumption and constraint analysis, modeling and simulation, and risk register

Correct Answer: C

Explanation:

In project risk management, understanding both the likelihood (or probability) of a risk occurring and the impact it could have on a project’s objectives is essential for effective planning and response. Several tools and techniques are commonly used to communicate this critical information. Among the options given, the most appropriate set that directly addresses the representation and communication of risk probability and impact is found in option C: probability distributions, sensitivity analysis, modeling and simulation, and probability and impact matrix.

A probability distribution is used in quantitative risk analysis to describe the range of possible values for uncertain project variables and the likelihood of each value. For instance, when estimating task duration or cost, a distribution (like normal, triangular, or beta) may be used to model uncertainty. This directly contributes to communicating the probability side of risk.

Sensitivity analysis helps identify which project uncertainties have the most potential impact on outcomes, allowing project managers to prioritize risk responses. It shows how changes in input variables (like time, cost, or scope) affect key project metrics, thereby supporting the understanding of impact.

Modeling and simulation, particularly Monte Carlo simulation, uses the probability distributions of inputs to model project behavior across thousands of iterations. The output provides a comprehensive view of potential outcomes and their probabilities. This technique supports decision-making by quantifying the combined effect of multiple uncertainties on the project, addressing both probability and impact.

The probability and impact matrix is a visual representation used in qualitative risk analysis to categorize and prioritize risks. Risks are plotted on a grid according to their assessed likelihood and consequence, allowing for a quick and intuitive assessment of which risks require attention.

Option A includes useful techniques like risk assessment and assumption analysis, but these are more general in nature and not all directly tied to expressing probability and impact. For instance, regression analysis is more aligned with statistical forecasting than risk communication.

Option B mixes valid techniques but includes "Monitor Risks process," which is a risk monitoring activity rather than a communication tool. Control charts are used in quality control rather than risk assessment, and "multi-dimensional risk assessment" is too vague without specifying methods used to assess those dimensions.

Option D similarly includes a mix of risk tools and processes, such as the "risk register," which is a documentation tool, and "Monitor Risks," which is a process—not a communication method for probability and impact.

Therefore, option C offers the most directly relevant and complete examples of tools that are specifically designed to quantify and communicate the probability and impact of risks in a project setting.

Question No 2:

When applying the risk register for cost risk analysis, which method helps account for how correlation develops naturally, eliminating the need to directly estimate correlation coefficients?

A. Risk Monte Carlo analysis
B. Risk driver method
C. Risk scatter diagram
D. Risk RACI matrix

Correct answer: B

Explanation:

In the context of project risk management, particularly when assessing cost risk, understanding the correlation between different cost components is vital. Often, risks are not isolated; a single risk can influence multiple areas of a project, leading to cost fluctuations that are correlated. For example, a delay in one critical path task might increase costs in several dependent tasks. Estimating the degree of this correlation manually can be subjective and error-prone, particularly when correlation coefficients are involved. That’s where the risk driver method proves especially valuable.

The risk driver method is a structured approach that identifies and models the root causes of risk (or "drivers") and connects these drivers to the project components they impact. Rather than estimating how correlated two variables are, the method lets correlation emerge naturally from the shared relationships to common risk drivers. For instance, if two cost elements are both influenced by the same external market condition, such as fluctuating material prices, the correlation between their cost risks will be a natural byproduct of their shared dependency on that risk driver.

This method bypasses the need to assign numerical correlation coefficients, which are often difficult to validate. Instead, it enhances the realism of cost simulations by aligning cost impacts with actual risk sources. When the risk driver method is used in combination with Monte Carlo simulations, the correlations become embedded in the simulation results without requiring artificial estimations.

Looking at the other choices:

A. Risk Monte Carlo analysis is a quantitative simulation technique that involves running many iterations of cost or schedule models with input uncertainty. However, by itself, it requires that correlations between variables be input manually if they are to be considered. It doesn't inherently model how correlation arises, which makes it less suited for modeling natural correlation unless combined with something like the risk driver method.

C. Risk scatter diagrams are useful for visualizing the correlation between two variables based on past data. While they help analyze the degree of correlation, they do not generate or model the correlation themselves and certainly do not eliminate the need for estimating correlation coefficients. They’re analytical tools, not modeling methods.

D. Risk RACI matrices clarify roles and responsibilities (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) for managing risks. They are related to governance and do not involve any form of quantitative modeling, let alone correlation modeling. Hence, they are irrelevant in the context of modeling cost risk correlations.

In summary, among the options presented, the risk driver method is the best suited for managing correlated risks in cost analysis without requiring manual estimation of correlation coefficients. It provides a more objective and realistic approach to modeling interdependencies in project cost risks.

Question No 3:

Which of the following characteristics would be typical of a person or group that demonstrates risk tolerance?

A. Adaptable and resourceful; not afraid to take action; thrill seeking
B. Discomfort with uncertainty; low tolerance for ambiguity; seeks security and resolution in the face of risk
C. Risk taking is a price worth paying for future payoffs; seeks strategies and tactics that have high future payoffs; thinks abstractly and creatively envisioning possibilities, and not afraid of change or unknowns
D. Reasonable comfort with most uncertainty; accepts risk as a normal feature of projects and business, and takes uncertainty in stride with no apparent or significant influence on their behavior

Correct answer: C

Explanation:

A person or group that exhibits risk tolerance typically embraces uncertainty and views it as an inherent part of pursuing opportunities or long-term goals. This mindset allows them to navigate situations that others may find too ambiguous or unpredictable. Option C describes individuals who regard risk-taking as a necessary cost for the potential of greater rewards in the future. Such individuals are forward-thinking and not deterred by the unknown. They adopt an imaginative and strategic approach to their decisions, weighing future gains over present safety. These qualities—visionary thinking, openness to change, and acceptance of uncertainty—are hallmarks of risk tolerance.

In contrast, option A describes a person who is thrill-seeking and takes risks for the sake of excitement. While this implies a high risk tolerance, it doesn't necessarily mean the individual is taking calculated or strategic risks for future gain. Instead, it aligns more closely with impulsiveness or sensation-seeking behavior rather than thoughtful risk tolerance grounded in long-term planning.

Option B directly contradicts the characteristics of a risk-tolerant person. It portrays an individual who finds uncertainty uncomfortable and actively avoids it, seeking instead the comfort of clarity and security. This description fits someone who is risk-averse, preferring predictable outcomes and minimal exposure to unknown variables.

Option D is more balanced and could describe a person with a moderate risk tolerance—someone who accepts uncertainty as a part of life or business but may not actively pursue high-risk, high-reward strategies. While they may not be deterred by risk, they don't necessarily seek it out as part of a larger strategic vision. Therefore, it lacks the defining future-oriented and proactive risk-taking nature of someone who is truly risk tolerant in the full sense.

Thus, C most accurately captures the essence of a risk-tolerant individual or group: forward-thinking, creative, and willing to endure uncertainty for the sake of meaningful, long-term rewards. They are not merely tolerating risk—they are leveraging it as a tool to achieve transformative outcomes.

Question No 4:

What should be true of project risk response strategies after a stakeholder meeting organized by the risk manager to obtain agreement on those strategies?

A. Scheduled, budgeted, and easy for project stakeholders to understand
B. Cost-effective, validated by Monte Carlo analysis, and assigned
C. Iterative, scaled to the project, and addressing threats and opportunities
D. Timely, cost-effective, agreed-upon, and accepted

Correct answer: D

Explanation:

When a risk manager convenes a stakeholder meeting to determine and confirm project risk response strategies, the goal is to reach a shared understanding and approval of the selected courses of action. Once the meeting concludes, the risk response strategies should be timely, meaning they are relevant to the current stage of the project and able to be implemented without delay. They must also be cost-effective, ensuring that the cost of addressing the risk is proportionate to the potential impact of the risk itself. Furthermore, these strategies must be agreed upon and accepted by all key stakeholders, including the project team and external parties where relevant. This acceptance is critical to ensure proper implementation and accountability.

Looking at option A, while having strategies that are scheduled, budgeted, and understandable is certainly beneficial, this does not fully capture the necessary outcomes of a stakeholder meeting focused on achieving agreement. Understandability alone does not ensure buy-in or practical feasibility, and although scheduling and budgeting are part of implementation, they come after strategy selection and approval.

Option B includes some valid elements, such as assigning responsibility and ensuring cost-effectiveness. However, requiring validation through Monte Carlo analysis is not universally applicable or necessary for all risk strategies, especially in smaller or less complex projects. Monte Carlo simulations are advanced quantitative tools used to model risk, but they are not always used or required for a strategy to be effective or accepted.

Option C emphasizes the iterative nature of risk management and the importance of scaling strategies to match the project's scope, as well as addressing both threats and opportunities. These are all important principles within risk management, particularly under standards such as PMI’s PMBOK. However, these characteristics are more aligned with the process of risk response development over time, rather than the outcome of a single stakeholder meeting. Moreover, while being iterative and scalable are good practices, they do not directly reflect the required consensus and acceptance that must result from the meeting.

Option D is the most comprehensive and appropriate choice. It reflects the key attributes that should result from a meeting of stakeholders aimed at finalizing risk responses. Risk response strategies must be timely so they can be implemented at the correct point in the project life cycle. They must also be cost-effective to justify their implementation relative to the potential impact of the risks they address. Most importantly, they must be agreed upon and accepted by stakeholders to ensure alignment, responsibility, and commitment, which are essential for the success of any risk mitigation or exploitation strategy. This aligns closely with guidance from the PMI and other risk management frameworks, which emphasize stakeholder involvement and buy-in during the planning of responses.

Therefore, the best answer is D.

Question No 5:

A new team member from a matrix organization joins the project. What is the most effective way for the project's risk manager to ensure the new member becomes familiar with the project's risk management practices?

A. The functional manager is responsible for providing the training.
B. Provide project specific risk training and mentor through the risk process.
C. Send the new team member the risk management plan to read.
D. Provide the new team member with a copy of the risk register and latest status report.

Correct Answer: B

Explanation:

When a new resource is added to a project team—especially in a matrix organization where team members often report to both functional and project managers—it is crucial to onboard them effectively into the project’s unique processes, particularly risk management. Simply giving documentation or relying on functional managers to handle the onboarding may lead to misunderstandings, lack of engagement, or inconsistent practices. Therefore, the risk manager should take an active role in helping the new member understand how the project handles risks.

Option A suggests that the functional manager is responsible for the training. While the functional manager may play a role in general development or functional orientation, they are not the appropriate authority to train someone on project-specific processes like risk management. That responsibility falls to the project team, and more specifically to the risk manager, who owns and executes the risk management processes.

Option C, which proposes sending the risk management plan for reading, assumes that self-study alone is sufficient. While reviewing the risk management plan is important, it is not enough to ensure full understanding or to address nuances and real-time considerations of the risk process being followed in the current project. It also misses the opportunity for two-way interaction, which is crucial for deeper comprehension and alignment with the team’s practices.

Option D recommends sharing the risk register and the latest status report. This provides visibility into ongoing risks but doesn’t explain how the risks were identified, analyzed, or how the process is managed. It’s a passive approach that lacks context and training on how to engage with or contribute to the risk process.

Option B stands out as the most comprehensive and proactive approach. By providing project-specific training and offering mentorship, the risk manager ensures the new team member not only understands the theoretical and documented aspects of the process but also gets practical guidance. This dual approach—training plus mentoring—facilitates real integration into the team and fosters engagement in risk-related activities. It supports consistency, ensures that the team member understands their role in risk identification and response, and contributes to maintaining a robust and dynamic risk culture within the project.

In summary, mentoring and tailored training are essential tools to embed new team members into the project’s unique risk practices. This ensures that the entire team operates with a shared understanding and coordinated approach to risk, which is fundamental to effective risk management in any project.

Question No 6:

A project stakeholder is hesitant to take actions that might lead to unfavorable outcomes for the project. What term best characterizes this stakeholder's perspective on project risks?

A. Risk averse
B. Risk neutral
C. Risk accepting
D. Not enough information available to describe the stakeholder's risk attitude

Answer: A

Explanation:

When analyzing a stakeholder's approach to project risk, it is crucial to consider their willingness to accept the possibility of loss or negative impact. The scenario presents a stakeholder who is reluctant to make decisions that could lead to unfavorable results. This indicates a conservative stance toward uncertainty and potential harm to the project’s success. The correct term for this cautious approach is risk averse.

Being risk averse means the stakeholder prefers to avoid risk whenever possible, especially if the risk might result in negative outcomes. Such individuals or groups are more likely to prioritize safety, certainty, and control over opportunities that carry potential downsides, even if those opportunities might also bring substantial benefits. In project management, risk-averse stakeholders may push for extensive contingency planning, thorough risk mitigation strategies, and decisions that minimize exposure to uncertainty, even if those choices limit potential rewards.

On the other hand, a risk neutral stakeholder (B) treats risks and rewards equally and is primarily focused on the expected value or outcome. They are indifferent to the degree of risk involved, as long as the potential reward is justified statistically. This is not consistent with the described behavior, which involves an unwillingness to face potential negative consequences.

A risk accepting stakeholder (C) is open to taking risks and might even encourage decisions that involve high uncertainty if the potential payoff is worthwhile. Such individuals or teams believe that avoiding all risk can hinder innovation and progress. This contrasts sharply with the scenario, where the stakeholder actively avoids making risky decisions.

Option D, which states "not enough information available to describe the stakeholder's risk attitude," is not appropriate in this case. The scenario explicitly provides clear behavioral indicators—namely, the stakeholder’s resistance to actions that might produce negative consequences. This is a strong signal of a risk-averse attitude, and thus, we have enough information to make a determination.

In summary, the stakeholder’s decision-making behavior demonstrates a clear preference to avoid risks that could potentially harm the project. This conservative posture aligns squarely with the definition of being risk averse, making A the best and most accurate choice.

Question No 7:

A project manager is preparing the risk management approach for a new project and organizes a planning workshop at the outset. A senior stakeholder responds to the invitation by suggesting that a risk management plan is unnecessary due to the project’s small size, and argues that skipping the plan would help save costs. 

What should the project manager do in response?

A. Advise the stakeholder that risk management is a valuable undertaking and must be applied to all projects to some degree.
B. Cancel the workshop, as the stakeholder is senior and risk management is an optional process, especially on smaller projects.
C. Continue with the workshop, but remove the stakeholder from the list of attendees.
D. Review the scope in an attempt to save money in other areas of the project to provide funding for the risk management activities.

Correct answer: A

Explanation:

When managing any project—regardless of its size—risk management is a fundamental discipline that ensures threats and opportunities are identified, assessed, and managed proactively. The scenario presented highlights a common situation in project management where stakeholders, especially those with senior authority, may question the necessity of certain processes due to perceived cost or time savings. However, eliminating risk planning entirely because the project is "small" is misguided. Risks exist in all projects, and failing to plan for them can actually lead to higher costs and delays if issues arise unexpectedly.

Option A represents the most professional and responsible course of action. By advising the stakeholder that risk management is a valuable and scalable process applicable to all projects, the project manager reinforces project governance and the principles of sound project management. The PMBOK® Guide, which outlines best practices in project management, clearly supports the idea that risk management should be tailored to each project but should never be omitted entirely. Even a lightweight or streamlined risk management plan is preferable to none at all.

Option B is not appropriate because it places too much weight on the opinion of a single stakeholder—even a senior one—at the expense of the project’s integrity. While stakeholder concerns should be acknowledged, it is the project manager’s duty to ensure that processes critical to project success are not bypassed. Moreover, risk management is not an optional luxury—it is a core planning component, and its cost is typically a small fraction compared to the potential cost of unmitigated risks.

Option C is also inappropriate and potentially damaging. Removing a senior stakeholder from the process can alienate that individual and reduce stakeholder engagement and support. Instead of exclusion, the project manager should aim for alignment and education, making a case for risk planning and how it can be scaled to fit the project’s size and complexity.

Option D implies that the project manager should try to "trade off" other scope items to retain risk management, which is not necessary here. Risk management does not necessarily require high costs; many activities such as identifying and documenting risks, creating a basic risk register, and assigning owners can be done with minimal budget, especially on small projects. The goal is to ensure thoughtful consideration of potential issues—not to create an elaborate or expensive system.

Ultimately, engaging the stakeholder in a constructive discussion and explaining the value of even basic risk management can build support and improve project outcomes. The project manager should also highlight that risk planning enables smarter decisions, more accurate budgeting, and fewer surprises during execution—making it an investment in success, not an expense to be cut. Thus, the most effective and balanced response is option A.

Question No 8:

What is the definition of a project issue in the context of managing a project environment?

A. A negative effect on a project objective arising from occurrence of a threat
B. A certain event which has a positive or negative impact in the project
C. A risk which has a significant impact on the project
D. An uncertain event which may impact the project

Correct answer: B

Explanation:

In project management, clarity of terms is essential for effective communication and control. A project issue is commonly misunderstood or confused with risks and uncertainties, but each term has a precise meaning in professional project environments, particularly in frameworks such as PRINCE2 or PMI’s PMBOK.

An issue in project management refers to an event or situation that has already occurred or is currently occurring and is impacting the project. It is different from a risk, which is an uncertain future event that may or may not happen. This distinction is crucial because while risks can be planned for and mitigated, issues require immediate action since they are already affecting the project.

Let’s examine each option in light of this understanding:

A describes a threat that causes a negative effect on a project objective, which aligns more closely with the definition of a realized negative risk, or simply the impact of a threat. While a realized risk can become an issue, the description focuses on the threat aspect rather than the fact that it is a current problem, which is the essence of an issue.

B correctly identifies an issue as a certain event that can have either a positive or negative impact on the project. The key phrase here is "certain event," meaning it is not a hypothetical or potential occurrence—it has already happened or is happening now. This makes B the most accurate definition of a project issue. It also leaves room for the possibility that issues are not always negative, though in practice, most issues do present obstacles or challenges. Still, the neutrality of this option allows for comprehensive application.

C defines an issue as a risk with a significant impact. This is a common misunderstanding. A risk is always defined by its uncertainty and potential impact, not by its level of significance. Even a significant risk, unless it has occurred, is still just a risk. Once it happens, it becomes an issue. Thus, the option blurs the line between two different project management terms and is inaccurate as a definition of a project issue.

D refers to an uncertain event, which is the textbook definition of a risk, not an issue. This option represents the classic language used to describe project risks: uncertain events that could affect the project positively or negatively. Again, the key distinction is the uncertainty. Once the event is certain and has occurred, it is categorized as an issue, not a risk.

In conclusion, among the four options, B most accurately describes what constitutes a project issue. It emphasizes that the event is certain and acknowledges its potential to impact the project either positively or negatively, thus aligning well with standard definitions from leading project management frameworks. Project teams need to actively manage issues through issue logs, immediate responses, and escalation processes when necessary, to minimize negative impacts and ensure project objectives remain on track.

Question No 9:

What is the main objective of addressing negative risks during the risk response planning process?

A. To transfer the probability of a risk happening to a third party, and to reduce the severity of the impact
B. To reduce the probability of a risk happening, and/or reduce the severity of the impact
C. To accept the probability of a risk happening to reduce the severity of the impact
D. To increase the probability of a risk happening, but reduce the severity of the impact

Correct answer: B

Explanation:

Mitigating negative risks—also known as threats—is a fundamental strategy within risk response planning in project management. The purpose of this approach is to act proactively to reduce either the likelihood that a risk will occur, the severity of its potential consequences, or ideally, both. This tactic is especially relevant in the context of project execution, where uncertainties can derail timelines, budgets, and scope if not managed appropriately.

When project managers identify potential negative risks, their goal is to assess and address those that could cause the most damage to project objectives. Option B captures this goal most accurately: to reduce the probability of a risk happening and/or reduce the severity of the impact. This dual focus is the essence of mitigation. For example, if a project team anticipates the risk of supplier delays, they might choose to engage multiple suppliers or procure materials earlier in the schedule. These are actions designed to decrease the likelihood of the risk (delays occurring) and limit the impact (project timeline slipping) if the risk does occur.

Option A refers more to the strategy of transferring risk, not mitigating it. Transference involves shifting the impact and/or management of a risk to a third party—typically through insurance, contracts, or outsourcing. While this is a valid risk response strategy, it is distinct from mitigation, which seeks to lower the risk’s occurrence or consequences within the organization’s own efforts.

Option C outlines risk acceptance, another legitimate response strategy, but again, it does not reflect the aim of mitigation. Acceptance means acknowledging a risk without taking proactive steps to prevent or control it—typically reserved for low-impact risks or when mitigation is too costly. This is a passive approach rather than a preventative one.

Option D is incorrect conceptually. Increasing the probability of a risk happening runs counter to any risk management goal, especially for negative risks. It is possible to intentionally increase the probability of positive risks, or opportunities, but this approach would not apply to threats.

Mitigation, therefore, is all about preparation and control. It involves developing contingency plans, implementing safeguards, conducting training, and using risk monitoring tools. The overarching goal is to ensure that the project is resilient against unforeseen challenges by limiting the scope and scale of their potential impact or stopping them from happening altogether. In summary, the correct and complete purpose of mitigating negative risks is to lessen the likelihood of occurrence and the magnitude of consequences if they do occur. That is why option B is the most accurate answer.

Question No 10:

The project team is working in a country where customs regulations are complicated and often change. While identifying risks, they recognize that there is a strong chance equipment might be delayed during customs clearance. These delays could be so severe that they may result in the project's cancellation. 

Based on this situation, how should the likelihood and severity of this risk be assessed?

A. Low probability / low impact
B. High probability / low impact
C. Low probability / high impact
D. High probability / high impact

Correct answer: D

Explanation:

In project risk management, both the probability (likelihood) of a risk occurring and its impact (severity of consequences if it does occur) are used to evaluate and prioritize risks. In this scenario, two critical pieces of information are given: (1) the customs procedures are known to be complex and change frequently, and (2) delays could result in project cancellation. These details are significant and influence how the risk should be assessed.

Let’s first consider the probability. Customs processes in the host country are described as not only complex but also subject to frequent changes. This suggests a volatile regulatory environment with a higher-than-average chance of delays occurring. Since the environment is unstable and the likelihood of disruption is increased, this suggests that the probability of this risk materializing is high. The team is also explicitly identifying it as a likely event during their risk identification process, reinforcing this conclusion.

Now consider the impact. If the equipment is delayed and it could lead to project cancellation, then the impact is not just a minor schedule adjustment or cost increase—it is potentially catastrophic. A project cancellation due to logistical issues like customs delay would have a very high impact on the project's success and could result in a total loss of investment, damage to the organization's reputation, and the failure to meet stakeholder expectations. The effect is so significant that it justifies the highest level of concern in the impact category.

Reviewing the options:

• A (low/low) is inaccurate because both the probability and the consequences are clearly described as significant.

• B (high/low) underestimates the potential severity of the delay, given that cancellation is a possible outcome.

• C (low/high) also fails to capture the true risk because the probability is described as relatively high.

• D (high/high) correctly reflects both the frequency and the seriousness of the risk.

Hence, the risk of equipment delays due to customs issues in this case must be treated with high priority in both dimensions: it's a high-probability, high-impact risk. This combination typically signals that the project team should develop immediate and robust mitigation strategies, such as engaging with customs consultants, pre-clearance processes, or contingency planning. Without careful risk response planning, the project is exposed to a threat that could bring it to a complete halt.