Cisco 200-301 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

The static-route table does not show OSPF neighbor states, their router IDs or the local DR/BDR election result.

These are Layer 2 VLAN and trunk displays and cannot substitute for OSPF neighbor and interface election diagnostics.

NAT and ARP state have no OSPF neighbor adjacency roles or elected DR/BDR fields.

Automatically derived IDs can change across process starts when eligible interface addresses change; explicit router-id fixes the identity.

The local OSPF process number is not a 32-bit router ID and need not match other routers.

Cost affects path selection, not the process-wide identifier placed into OSPF LSAs.

Loopback addresses are preferred over active nonloopback interface addresses, even when a physical interface has a numerically larger IPv4 value.

The ordinary automatic selection uses the highest eligible loopback address, not necessarily the lowest-numbered loopback interface.

The process can automatically derive a router ID from available interface addresses without an explicit configured router-id.

When eligible active physical IPv4 interface addresses exist, IOS can derive a router ID without needing a loopback.

The automatic fallback selects the highest eligible active interface IPv4 address, not the lowest.

Area ID and router ID are distinct fields; being in area 0 does not set a router-specific 32-bit ID.

DR election priority and the 32-bit process router ID are different OSPF settings.

Router IDs are chosen locally; peers do not assign the process identifier to this router.

ARP cache clearing does not recalculate the OSPF process ID that was already selected when the process started.

An explicitly configured OSPF router ID may differ from the interface addresses; process output reports the actual selection.

OSPF routes identify networks and next hops, not the local 32-bit process router ID.

Ethernet STP bridge identities are unrelated to the router’s OSPF process identity.

This is a process-level wildcard network statement affecting a broad set of addresses and does not meet the exact per-interface configuration requirement.

That would place the interface in area 1 rather than the explicitly required backbone area 0.

Passive disables Hello exchange and does not by itself add Gi0/1 to the requested OSPF process and area.

Broadcast mode supports DR/BDR election, which is what the two-router point-to-point design wants to avoid.

High priority influences DR election on a broadcast segment; it does not change the interface network type to point-to-point.

PortFast controls Layer 2 switch edge forwarding, not OSPF routed-interface network type or DR election.

OSPF priority zero controls DR/BDR election eligibility on a multiaccess segment, not SPF interface path cost.

Reference bandwidth is configured per OSPF process and affects auto-calculated interface costs broadly, not just an exact one-interface explicit metric.

A static default route adds a separate candidate forwarding path but does not set the OSPF cost of this link.

The LSDB display lists advertisements and does not directly provide all configured local Gi0/1 timers and network-type information.

The routing table lists installed OSPF routes but does not explain the OSPF interface Hello and dead timing parameters.

A Layer 2 trunk display is irrelevant to OSPF interface network type, timers and area membership.

This reports OSPF routes selected into the RIB; not every LSA in the link-state database becomes a selected installed route.

This reports peers and adjacency states, not the full set of received and originated link-state advertisements.

Ethernet counters are physical and link-layer statistics rather than OSPF LSA contents.