Microsoft AZ-104 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

The two mechanisms are not universally composable. Ignoring their documented restriction can cause the requested configuration to be rejected.

Removing an extension without undoing the guest ADE configuration does not overcome the Azure encryption-at-host compatibility restriction for VMs that have used ADE.

Supported VM size is a separate prerequisite; it does not undo the documented incompatibility for a VM currently or previously configured with Azure Disk Encryption.

Automatic key rotation manages transitions between encryption-key versions. It does not make a key held in another region a supported key source for this East US disk-encryption configuration.

Resource-group ownership is an organizational boundary, not a substitute for regional proximity. The deployment still references a key stored in West US and therefore continues to violate the same-region restriction.

Authorization is essential, so examining role assignments sounds plausible. The case already establishes valid cryptographic permissions, however; adding another role does not remove the separate requirement for regional key-store placement.

Guest disk encryption and host-path encryption are different layers. Encrypting a guest volume does not necessarily specify host handling of transient disk data.

Storage-account infrastructure encryption is a different storage service setting and does not toggle encryption of an Azure VM's host-side data path. Guest BitLocker-based Azure Disk Encryption and supported Encryption at Host must be evaluated as distinct controls.

RBAC Owner does not automatically switch on a VM encryption feature. Encryption settings require supported VM configuration and compatibility verification.

A Key Vault secret or encryption key records available key material, not proof that the intended Linux guest volumes are currently protected by dm-crypt. Confirm the live mapper and ADE extension state inside the guest.

A platform encryption flag does not describe guest filesystem mapping. The VM may have no ADE configuration while its managed disks remain encrypted at rest.

Disk capacities and names do not by themselves establish active dm-crypt mappings. Check the device-mapper encryption type and actual cryptsetup state together with Azure Disk Encryption extension health; size consistency alone is not evidence of encryption.

Incremental snapshots store changed disk blocks, but the encryption-set constraint still binds each snapshot to its associated disk. Giving successive incremental copies different disk encryption set identities is not the supported way to manage encryption in that lineage. Use the same encryption set for the disk and the associated incremental snapshots while controlling key versions through supported key-management behavior.

The disk and key store region restriction is necessary for CMK support, but geographic proximity alone does not make two distinct disk encryption sets interchangeable. Incremental snapshots associated with a disk are required to share its DES. Simply creating the other set in the same region does not satisfy the identity-level consistency rule.

A disk encryption set is an Azure resource with its own identity and key-reference management. Even if two sets refer to the same Key Vault key, they are distinct DES resources. A disk and associated incremental snapshots require the same DES, not merely a matching vault key, so this proposal still violates the supported relationship.

Rebuilding a VM unnecessarily affects uptime and cannot itself configure a disk encryption set to follow successive Key Vault versions. Key rotation is handled in Azure managed disk encryption infrastructure, not by recreating VM operating systems for each new key version.

Guest automatic patching schedules supported operating system updates. It does not manage the disk encryption set activeKey reference or subscribe that set to new Key Vault key versions. The required automation is an encryption-set property, not a VM patch classification.

Manually pointing a disk encryption set at the latest version updates the current reference, but does not ensure future versions are adopted automatically. Configure automatic rotation to latest key version on the disk encryption set for the required continuing lifecycle, subject to supported Key Vault and disk settings.

A disk encryption set changes the key-management model for supported server-side disk encryption. It does not make an unsupported compute SKU/region eligible for Encryption at Host. Choose a supported VM size and the correct reconfiguration flow.

Guest Azure Disk Encryption is a different encryption mechanism and can be incompatible with encryption at host. It cannot make an unsupported VM size suddenly support the host feature.

Disk encryption sets control at-rest key usage; they cannot add hardware or SKU support for the host-encryption feature. Choose a regionally supported VM size and follow the required VM reconfiguration procedure.

Health probes influence load balancing and instance repair decisions, not the encryption state of an existing host. Changing a probe does not carry out the required deallocation and reallocation.

Guest credentials and application processes are unrelated to host encryption being applied at the Azure infrastructure layer. Password rotation does not force existing hosts to adopt the encryption setting.

A disk encryption set manages customer keys for managed disks, not the host-encryption rollout to already-running instances. The original host path would still use its previous setting.

Blob tier settings control object-storage access and cost, not availability of CPU and memory configurations on a VM host cluster.

Network address planning does not alter the underlying hardware SKUs available for a VM resize.

Reader is read-only Azure RBAC and does not grant resizing rights or resolve a target SKU unavailable on the current cluster.

Temporary storage is not durable and may be affected by host placement or deallocation. It must not be relied on as surviving every resize.

Selecting a different management interface does not make the Azure compute resize a live in-process change. Supported Azure VM size changes interrupt a running VM and restart the operating system. Plan the application outage even if a prior deallocation is unnecessary.

Attached managed data disks normally remain with a supported resized VM; deleting them would risk data loss and is not a generic prerequisite.

Moving resources between resource groups changes their management container but not the VM or managed disk deployment region. The workload still runs in the original region; a supported regional migration and dependent-resource cutover are necessary.

A VM's deployed region is not a mutable setting that can be reassigned in place by an incremental template update. Regional relocation must account for actual compute, disk and network resources and application cutover.

Resource Mover can help orchestrate supported resource moves between regions, but a metadata-only move cannot relocate the VM. The plan must migrate the supported VM and associated dependencies, then validate and cut over the application.