Microsoft AZ-900 Practice Test 18

100% Latest & Updated Microsoft AZ-900 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps & Verified Answers!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

Question 170

A bank is concerned cloud services can be provisioned outside approved policy. What should the team configure or perform to implement the correct approach?

Choose the approved redundancy option for the relevant Azure storage account.
Apply appropriate Azure Policy assignments at the required scope.
Provision test stacks from a reviewed deployment template rather than ad hoc clicks.
Distribute eligible application instances across independent failure boundaries.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Apply appropriate Azure Policy assignments at the required scope. The implementation operationalizes this design choice: Establish governance controls in addition to securing individual workloads. Acceptance should demonstrate: Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.

Incorrect Answers

This setup is relevant to another workload: A charity worries data may disappear when a single storage device fails. The current configuration must instead achieve: Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.

This change would be appropriate under a different condition: A nonprofit wants a repeatable way to deploy infrastructure in multiple test environments. Here it would not validate: Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.

This setup is relevant to another workload: A ticketing platform wants uptime after a single VM host fails. The current configuration must instead achieve: Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.

Question 171

A bank is concerned cloud services can be provisioned outside approved policy. Which evidence best confirms the requirement is being met?

User sessions stay within SLO while a subset of instances upgrades.
Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.
Operators can inspect resource health across the intended scope.
Representative users meet latency goals in target markets.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects. That directly tests the stated requirement: A bank is concerned cloud services can be provisioned outside approved policy. It contrasts with the observed failure: Teams deploy unapproved locations despite an internal governance document.

Incorrect Answers

This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A tourism service wants software patches installed without unscheduled customer outages. It does not test the necessary outcome here: Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.

The test is relevant when an IT service provider wants rapid visibility into resource health and resource inventory. It cannot establish the specified acceptance result: Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.

This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A product team needs lower latency for customers spread across distant regions. It does not test the necessary outcome here: Disallowed settings are detected or blocked according to policy effects.

Question 172

A bank is concerned cloud services can be provisioned outside approved policy. The team observes: Teams deploy unapproved locations despite an internal governance document. What is the most likely cause of the observed failure?

The policy standard existed only on paper and was not assigned or enforced.
The architecture had recovery copies but no high-availability design.
All replicas were concentrated in the same availability zone.
The design relied on replication without a tested recovery procedure.

Explanation

Correct Answer

The policy standard existed only on paper and was not assigned or enforced. That explains the symptom: Teams deploy unapproved locations despite an internal governance document. The targeted corrective action is: Apply appropriate Azure Policy assignments at the required scope.

Incorrect Answers

The alternate mechanism would more directly produce this other failure: Every failure requires hours of manual database restoration. The current incident instead involves: Teams deploy unapproved locations despite an internal governance document.

That explanation belongs to a different fault pattern: A zonal failure removes every application instance. It does not explain why teams deploy unapproved locations despite an internal governance document.

This cause is consistent with a different issue: Data is replicated but recovery cannot complete within the promised time. It does not account for the reported symptom here: Teams deploy unapproved locations despite an internal governance document.

Question 173

A startup wants application capacity changes tracked without lengthy hardware purchasing. Which architectural decision meets the described priority?

Recognize self-service provisioning as a cloud manageability benefit.
Use cloud governance and security features to establish accountable permissions.
Interpret service-specific SLA terms and architecture prerequisites.
Design redundancy or availability measures rather than simply increasing CPU capacity.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Recognize self-service provisioning as a cloud manageability benefit. The governing requirement is: A startup wants application capacity changes tracked without lengthy hardware purchasing. This solution specifically supports the outcome that authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

Incorrect Answers

That concept addresses this separate situation: A regulated service needs auditable access across operations teams. It does not by itself establish the result required here: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

This option solves a different planning problem: An engineering firm wants to know which outages are covered by Azure SLAs. The current acceptance criterion is specific: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

This design is appropriate for a different requirement: A ticketing platform wants uptime after a single VM host fails. Here the decisive outcome must instead be: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

Question 174

A startup wants application capacity changes tracked without lengthy hardware purchasing. Which configuration or operating action most directly puts that decision into practice?

Tune autoscale upper and lower bounds and watch charges against a budget.
Stage changes across instances behind appropriate routing and health checks.
Configure health checks and bounded retry behavior for appropriate dependencies.
Grant appropriate resource deployment permissions and enforce quotas.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Grant appropriate resource deployment permissions and enforce quotas. The implementation operationalizes this design choice: Recognize self-service provisioning as a cloud manageability benefit. Acceptance should demonstrate: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

Incorrect Answers

This setup is relevant to another workload: A retail store needs its web service to tolerate unexpected demand while controlling spend. The current configuration must instead achieve: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

That action implements a different requirement: A tourism service wants software patches installed without unscheduled customer outages. It does not establish the required result in this case: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

This change would be appropriate under a different condition: A delivery company wants resilience when one dependency is down for a short period. Here it would not validate: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

Question 175

A startup wants application capacity changes tracked without lengthy hardware purchasing. Which observation is the strongest acceptance test for this scenario?

Equivalent test environments have consistent declared resource settings.
Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.
A recovery exercise meets agreed RTO and RPO measures.
An instance fault triggers availability behavior without waiting for a backup restore.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers. That directly tests the stated requirement: A startup wants application capacity changes tracked without lengthy hardware purchasing. It contrasts with the observed failure: Every instance request still requires buying and racking new equipment.

Incorrect Answers

This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A nonprofit wants a repeatable way to deploy infrastructure in multiple test environments. It does not test the necessary outcome here: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

The test is relevant when a municipal app must recover quickly after a regional disruption. It cannot establish the specified acceptance result: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A school plans a cloud database and assumes backup copies alone deliver high availability. It does not test the necessary outcome here: Authorized users can provision approved resources without ordering physical servers.

Question 176

A startup wants application capacity changes tracked without lengthy hardware purchasing. The team observes: Every instance request still requires buying and racking new equipment. Which planning or configuration error best accounts for this result?

The process kept an on-premises hardware procurement model.
Permissions were overbroad and audit visibility was not configured.
Backups were never tested for usable recovery.
All replicas were concentrated in the same availability zone.

Explanation

Correct Answer

The process kept an on-premises hardware procurement model. That explains the symptom: Every instance request still requires buying and racking new equipment. The targeted corrective action is: Grant appropriate resource deployment permissions and enforce quotas.

Incorrect Answers

The alternate mechanism would more directly produce this other failure: Unknown users can modify production resources without a trace. The current incident instead involves: Every instance request still requires buying and racking new equipment.

That explanation belongs to a different fault pattern: A backup dashboard is green but no test restore succeeds. It does not explain why every instance request still requires buying and racking new equipment.

This cause is consistent with a different issue: A zonal failure removes every application instance. It does not account for the reported symptom here: Every instance request still requires buying and racking new equipment.

Question 177

A delivery company wants resilience when one dependency is down for a short period. Which Azure or cloud concept most directly matches the requirement?

Use a disaster-recovery design with defined recovery time and recovery point targets.
Use centralized management and monitoring capabilities rather than manual per-VM logins.
Design resilient application patterns such as retries and alternate healthy instances.
Interpret service-specific SLA terms and architecture prerequisites.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Design resilient application patterns such as retries and alternate healthy instances. The governing requirement is: A delivery company wants resilience when one dependency is down for a short period. This solution specifically supports the outcome that transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

Incorrect Answers

This design is appropriate for a different requirement: A municipal app must recover quickly after a regional disruption. Here the decisive outcome must instead be: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

That concept addresses this separate situation: An IT service provider wants rapid visibility into resource health and resource inventory. It does not by itself establish the result required here: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

This design is appropriate for a different requirement: An engineering firm wants to know which outages are covered by Azure SLAs. Here the decisive outcome must instead be: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

Question 178

A delivery company wants resilience when one dependency is down for a short period. Which implementation step would best fulfill the stated requirement?

Configure health checks and bounded retry behavior for appropriate dependencies.
Assign scoped roles and retain audit activity records for privileged operations.
Organize resources for portal and monitoring views with appropriate access.
Provision test stacks from a reviewed deployment template rather than ad hoc clicks.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Configure health checks and bounded retry behavior for appropriate dependencies. The implementation operationalizes this design choice: Design resilient application patterns such as retries and alternate healthy instances. Acceptance should demonstrate: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

Incorrect Answers

That action implements a different requirement: A regulated service needs auditable access across operations teams. It does not establish the required result in this case: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

This change would be appropriate under a different condition: An IT service provider wants rapid visibility into resource health and resource inventory. Here it would not validate: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

This setup is relevant to another workload: A nonprofit wants a repeatable way to deploy infrastructure in multiple test environments. The current configuration must instead achieve: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

Question 179

A delivery company wants resilience when one dependency is down for a short period. Which result would best demonstrate successful implementation?

Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.
Observed monthly latency stays within the agreed range under comparable load.
Equivalent test environments have consistent declared resource settings.
A deleted file can be restored to a verified recent recovery point.

Explanation

Correct Answer

Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure. That directly tests the stated requirement: A delivery company wants resilience when one dependency is down for a short period. It contrasts with the observed failure: Requests fail permanently on the first brief network interruption.

Incorrect Answers

That check tests another control: A payroll team wants predictable monthly performance rather than only occasional availability. The decisive result for this workload is: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

The test is relevant when a nonprofit wants a repeatable way to deploy infrastructure in multiple test environments. It cannot establish the specified acceptance result: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A company wants fast restoration of accidentally deleted cloud data. It does not test the necessary outcome here: Transient faults are handled without endless retries or total service failure.

Question 180

A delivery company wants resilience when one dependency is down for a short period. The team observes: Requests fail permanently on the first brief network interruption. What should the team identify as the primary mechanism behind the problem?

Only scalability was tested, not fault tolerance.
The architecture had recovery copies but no high-availability design.
The application lacks failure-handling behavior even though hosted in the cloud.
All replicas were concentrated in the same availability zone.

Explanation

Correct Answer

The application lacks failure-handling behavior even though hosted in the cloud. That explains the symptom: Requests fail permanently on the first brief network interruption. The targeted corrective action is: Configure health checks and bounded retry behavior for appropriate dependencies.

Incorrect Answers

This cause is consistent with a different issue: A system passes load tests but fails on a single-zone outage. It does not account for the reported symptom here: Requests fail permanently on the first brief network interruption.

The alternate mechanism would more directly produce this other failure: Every failure requires hours of manual database restoration. The current incident instead involves: Requests fail permanently on the first brief network interruption.

This cause is consistent with a different issue: A zonal failure removes every application instance. It does not account for the reported symptom here: Requests fail permanently on the first brief network interruption.

Microsoft AZ-900 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

Question 170

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 171

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 172

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 173

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 174

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 175

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 176

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 177

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 178

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 179

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers

Question 180

Explanation

Correct Answer

Incorrect Answers