100% Latest & Updated Microsoft AZ-900 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps & Verified Answers!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!
Question 210
A startup needs complete control of guest OS settings and kernel-level software. Which implementation step would best fulfill the stated requirement?
- Provision a supported Azure VM and manage the guest image and updates.
- Record which API requirements justify OS control before choosing the service model.
- Define runtime execution and customer data access roles separately.
- Assign secure-code, identity and data-policy controls to the application owner.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Provision a supported Azure VM and manage the guest image and updates. The implementation operationalizes this design choice: Choose Azure virtual machines as IaaS for required guest OS control. Acceptance should demonstrate: The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
Incorrect Answers
B:That action implements a different requirement: A company compares VM hosting against managed web hosting for a new API. It does not establish the required result in this case: The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
C:This change would be appropriate under a different condition: A web company uses managed functions but stores data in a customer-controlled database. Here it would not validate: The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
D:This setup is relevant to another workload: A customer expects Azure PaaS to remove all application security duties. The current configuration must instead achieve: The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
Question 211
A startup needs complete control of guest OS settings and kernel-level software. Which result would best demonstrate successful implementation?
- The responsibility matrix leaves provider platform patching separate from app security.
- The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
- The web team patches guests while the database host is provider-operated.
- Lessons are delivered through ready-made application functionality.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software. That directly tests the stated requirement: A startup needs complete control of guest OS settings and kernel-level software. It contrasts with the observed failure: The hosting product does not permit guest OS customization.
Incorrect Answers
A:This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A customer expects Azure PaaS to remove all application security duties. It does not test the necessary outcome here: The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
C:The test is relevant when a data science app needs managed relational storage but keeps its web tier on VMs. It cannot establish the specified acceptance result: The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
D:This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A school wants instructors to access an online learning application without installing server software. It does not test the necessary outcome here: The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
Question 212
A startup needs complete control of guest OS settings and kernel-level software. The team observes: The hosting product does not permit guest OS customization. What should the team identify as the primary mechanism behind the problem?
- The assessment ignored service-model differences in control and responsibility.
- The application was deployed as a tenant-managed VM rather than managed PaaS.
- It selected a development platform instead of an application product.
- A managed application platform was chosen despite a raw-VM requirement.
Explanation
Correct Answer
D:A managed application platform was chosen despite a raw-VM requirement. That explains the symptom: The hosting product does not permit guest OS customization. The targeted corrective action is: Provision a supported Azure VM and manage the guest image and updates.
Incorrect Answers
A:This cause is consistent with a different issue: Developers assume a VM and App Service offer identical guest OS privileges. It does not account for the reported symptom here: The hosting product does not permit guest OS customization.
B:The alternate mechanism would more directly produce this other failure: Engineers keep scheduling host OS patches for the app runtime. The current incident instead involves: The hosting product does not permit guest OS customization.
C:That explanation belongs to a different fault pattern: The school must first create all learning features using a web app runtime. It does not explain why the hosting product does not permit guest OS customization.
Question 213
A small company wants to publish a web API while avoiding OS patch management. Which design choice best fits the stated business constraint?
- Choose a managed SaaS productivity suite rather than custom hosting.
- Use a mixed service-model architecture where each tier has a justified responsibility boundary.
- Use an eligible Azure App Service plan as PaaS for the API.
- Choose Azure virtual machines as IaaS for required guest OS control.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:Use an eligible Azure App Service plan as PaaS for the API. The governing requirement is: A small company wants to publish a web API while avoiding OS patch management. This solution specifically supports the outcome that the API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
Incorrect Answers
A:This design is appropriate for a different requirement: A sales team wants email, calendars, and collaboration without writing a custom application. Here the decisive outcome must instead be: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
B:That concept addresses this separate situation: A data science app needs managed relational storage but keeps its web tier on VMs. It does not by itself establish the result required here: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
D:This design is appropriate for a different requirement: A startup needs complete control of guest OS settings and kernel-level software. Here the decisive outcome must instead be: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
Question 214
A small company wants to publish a web API while avoiding OS patch management. Which Azure setup action best follows from this scenario?
- Deploy the API to an App Service with supported runtime and configuration.
- Record which API requirements justify OS control before choosing the service model.
- Define runtime execution and customer data access roles separately.
- Install the compatible driver inside a managed guest OS on an Azure VM.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Deploy the API to an App Service with supported runtime and configuration. The implementation operationalizes this design choice: Use an eligible Azure App Service plan as PaaS for the API. Acceptance should demonstrate: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
Incorrect Answers
B:That action implements a different requirement: A company compares VM hosting against managed web hosting for a new API. It does not establish the required result in this case: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
C:This change would be appropriate under a different condition: A web company uses managed functions but stores data in a customer-controlled database. Here it would not validate: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
D:This setup is relevant to another workload: A legacy billing server requires an installed third-party kernel driver. The current configuration must instead achieve: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
Question 215
A small company wants to publish a web API while avoiding OS patch management. Which verification outcome should the team expect from the right design?
- Lessons are delivered through ready-made application functionality.
- The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
- The selected model matches driver and patch-management expectations.
- The team can configure its guest OS and runs required software.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration. That directly tests the stated requirement: A small company wants to publish a web API while avoiding OS patch management. It contrasts with the observed failure: The team still patches the Windows/Linux VM operating system for the web API.
Incorrect Answers
A:This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A school wants instructors to access an online learning application without installing server software. It does not test the necessary outcome here: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
C:The test is relevant when a company compares VM hosting against managed web hosting for a new API. It cannot establish the specified acceptance result: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
D:This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A startup needs complete control of guest OS settings and kernel-level software. It does not test the necessary outcome here: The API serves requests without customer guest-OS administration.
Question 216
A small company wants to publish a web API while avoiding OS patch management. The team observes: The team still patches the Windows/Linux VM operating system for the web API. Which underlying mistake most directly explains the reported symptom?
- The workload was hosted on customer-managed IaaS rather than PaaS.
- The service model lacks required guest-level control.
- It selected infrastructure or platform tools instead of the needed SaaS product.
- The assessment ignored service-model differences in control and responsibility.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:The workload was hosted on customer-managed IaaS rather than PaaS. That explains the symptom: The team still patches the Windows/Linux VM operating system for the web API. The targeted corrective action is: Deploy the API to an App Service with supported runtime and configuration.
Incorrect Answers
B:The alternate mechanism would more directly produce this other failure: A managed app runtime rejects the renderer's OS dependencies. The current incident instead involves: The team still patches the Windows/Linux VM operating system for the web API.
C:That explanation belongs to a different fault pattern: The project requires developers to build and operate email services from scratch. It does not explain why the team still patches the Windows/Linux VM operating system for the web API.
D:This cause is consistent with a different issue: Developers assume a VM and App Service offer identical guest OS privileges. It does not account for the reported symptom here: The team still patches the Windows/Linux VM operating system for the web API.
Question 217
A sales team wants email, calendars, and collaboration without writing a custom application. What is the most appropriate cloud concept or service for this need?
- Use a mixed service-model architecture where each tier has a justified responsibility boundary.
- Choose a managed SaaS productivity suite rather than custom hosting.
- Use IaaS VMs where custom image and OS administration are required.
- Separate OS-management flexibility from reduced platform administration in IaaS versus PaaS.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Choose a managed SaaS productivity suite rather than custom hosting. The governing requirement is: A sales team wants email, calendars, and collaboration without writing a custom application. This solution specifically supports the outcome that users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
Incorrect Answers
A:This design is appropriate for a different requirement: A data science app needs managed relational storage but keeps its web tier on VMs. Here the decisive outcome must instead be: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
C:This option solves a different planning problem: A graphic-rendering pipeline must run a specific custom OS image under root administrative control. The current acceptance criterion is specific: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
D:This design is appropriate for a different requirement: A company compares VM hosting against managed web hosting for a new API. Here the decisive outcome must instead be: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
Question 218
A sales team wants email, calendars, and collaboration without writing a custom application. What should the team configure or perform to implement the correct approach?
- Provision user access to the approved Microsoft 365 applications.
- Define runtime execution and customer data access roles separately.
- Deploy the API to an App Service with supported runtime and configuration.
- Deploy the compatible custom image as a VM and secure privileged access.
Explanation
Correct Answer
A:Provision user access to the approved Microsoft 365 applications. The implementation operationalizes this design choice: Choose a managed SaaS productivity suite rather than custom hosting. Acceptance should demonstrate: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
Incorrect Answers
B:That action implements a different requirement: A web company uses managed functions but stores data in a customer-controlled database. It does not establish the required result in this case: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
C:This change would be appropriate under a different condition: A small company wants to publish a web API while avoiding OS patch management. Here it would not validate: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
D:This setup is relevant to another workload: A graphic-rendering pipeline must run a specific custom OS image under root administrative control. The current configuration must instead achieve: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
Question 219
A sales team wants email, calendars, and collaboration without writing a custom application. Which evidence best confirms the requirement is being met?
- The responsibility matrix leaves provider platform patching separate from app security.
- Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
- The service binds to the guest environment as required by its licensing rules.
- The web team patches guests while the database host is provider-operated.
Explanation
Correct Answer
B:Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers. That directly tests the stated requirement: A sales team wants email, calendars, and collaboration without writing a custom application. It contrasts with the observed failure: The project requires developers to build and operate email services from scratch.
Incorrect Answers
A:This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A customer expects Azure PaaS to remove all application security duties. It does not test the necessary outcome here: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
C:The test is relevant when an IT team needs a dedicated Linux server for a hard-coded proprietary licensing service. It cannot establish the specified acceptance result: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
D:This observation is evidence for a separate scenario: A data science app needs managed relational storage but keeps its web tier on VMs. It does not test the necessary outcome here: Users access ready-made business apps without managing source code or app servers.
Question 220
A sales team wants email, calendars, and collaboration without writing a custom application. The team observes: The project requires developers to build and operate email services from scratch. What is the most likely cause of the observed failure?
- The application was deployed as a tenant-managed VM rather than managed PaaS.
- The platform abstraction removed a required guest OS capability.
- It selected infrastructure or platform tools instead of the needed SaaS product.
- The assessment ignored service-model differences in control and responsibility.
Explanation
Correct Answer
C:It selected infrastructure or platform tools instead of the needed SaaS product. That explains the symptom: The project requires developers to build and operate email services from scratch. The targeted corrective action is: Provision user access to the approved Microsoft 365 applications.
Incorrect Answers
A:This cause is consistent with a different issue: Engineers keep scheduling host OS patches for the app runtime. It does not account for the reported symptom here: The project requires developers to build and operate email services from scratch.
B:The alternate mechanism would more directly produce this other failure: The licensing daemon cannot run on the selected managed hosting tier. The current incident instead involves: The project requires developers to build and operate email services from scratch.
D:This cause is consistent with a different issue: Developers assume a VM and App Service offer identical guest OS privileges. It does not account for the reported symptom here: The project requires developers to build and operate email services from scratch.
Microsoft Azure Fundamentals (AZ-900) Practice Tests